Thursday 18 April 2019

OTHERSTIDE EVE


“ My real problem was that while everyone else in the universe could call The Doctor ‘Doctor’ , his own Family would obviously call him by his real name. 

Fortunately The Doctor's disgrace came to the rescue. 

His incensed Family had struck their embarrassing renegade's name from the House's records.

It was just the Law of Irony that brought him neatly home to Lungbarrow on his nameday (some very Russian influences there), which just happened, purely coincidentally, to be the Feast of Otherstide as well. 

Only, The Other doesn't have a name either…

I do like the fact that The Doctor eventually became the very thing he had planned to avoid. 

The Family wanted him to be President of the High Council, but were, of course, otherwise occupied when the event actually happened.

Yet another triumph for the Law of Irony. ”

Excerpt From
Lungbarrow
by Marc Platt



The World as Forum for Action is “composed,” essentially, of three constituent elements, which tend to manifest themselves in typical patterns of metaphoric representation. 



First is unexplored territory – the Great Mother, nature, creative and destructive, source and final resting place of all determinate things.  


Second is explored territory – the Great Father, culture, protective and tyrannical, cumulative ancestral wisdom. 




Third is the process that mediates between unexplored and explored territory – 
The Divine Son, the archetypal individual, creative exploratory “Word” and vengeful adversary. 

We are adapted to this “World of Divine Characters,” much as the “Objective World.” 

The fact of this adaptation implies that the environment is in “reality” a forum for action, as well as a place of things. 

Unprotected exposure to unexplored territory produces FEAR. 

The Individual is protected from such fear as a consequence of “Ritual Imitation of The Great Father” – 
as a consequence of the adoption of group identity, which restricts the Meaning of Things, and confers Predictability on Social Interactions. 




When identification with the group is made absolute, however – when everything has to be controlled, when the unknown is no longer allowed to exist – the creative exploratory process that updates the group can no longer manifest itself. 




This “restriction of adaptive capacity” dramatically increases the probability of social aggression and chaos. 


MISSY’S COLOURS

Rejection of The Unknown is tantamount to “Identification with THE DEVIL,” the mythological counterpart and eternal adversary of the world-creating exploratory hero. 

Such rejection and identification is a consequence of Luciferian Pride, which states: 
All that I know is all that is necessary to know.’ 

This pride is totalitarian assumption of Omniscience – is adoption of “God’s place” by “reason” – is something that inevitably generates a state of personal and social being indistinguishable from HELL. 

This Hell develops because creative exploration – impossible, without (humble) acknowledgment of the unknown – constitutes the process that constructs and maintains the protective adaptive structure that gives Life much of its acceptable meaning. 




“Identification with The Devil” 
amplifies the dangers inherent in group identification, which tends of its own accord towards pathological stultification. Loyalty to personal interest – subjective meaning – can serve as an antidote to the overwhelming temptation constantly posed by the possibility of denying anomaly. 

Personal interest – subjective meaning – reveals itself at the juncture of explored and unexplored territory, and is indicative of participation in the process that ensures continued healthy individual and societal adaptation. 

Loyalty to personal interest is equivalent to identification with the archetypal Hero – 

The “Saviour” 

– who upholds his association with the creative “Word” in the Face of Death, and in spite of Group Pressure to Conform. 

Identification with The Hero serves to decrease the unbearable motivational valence of the unknown; furthermore, provides the individual with a standpoint that simultaneously transcends and maintains the group.”

No comments:

Post a Comment