Tuesday, 28 April 2015

Brand X : You Know that the Hypnotised Never Lie

Say the right thing,
When electioneering...

Well I come forwards,
You go backwards
And somewhere we will meet...


There's nothing in the streets
Looks any different to me
And the slogans are replaced, by-the-bye
And the parting on the left
Are now parting on the right
And the beards have all grown longer overnight

I'll tip my hat to the new constitution
Take a bow for the new revolution
Smile and grin at the change all around
I'll pick up my guitar and play...
Just like yesterday

Then I'll get on my knees and pray...
We don't get fooled again

Don't get fooled again
No, no!


Meet the new boss
Same as the old boss

- The Who

"LOVE" spoken backwards is "VOLE"

Phone-in Caller, 1984 : 
I was wondering what your opinion was regarding Lyndon H. LaRouche...?

Dave Emory, 1984 :
I know almost nothing about Mr. LaRouche, but I have noticed that he appears to have rather a lot of money.

‘He discredits leftwing thought’: Russell Brand addresses anti-austerity demonstrators at a rally in London in June. Photograph: Rex Features
"The rich can buy anything in Britain, and they have now brought us their own opposition. Russell Brand is the voice of the discontented wealthy. He tells us that money can’t buy you love – which I already knew – and that only the complete overthrow of the existing system and embrace of mysticism can take us from “the shallow pool of the known” to the “great untamable ocean” beyond.
I was prepared to dismiss Revolution as the swollen ramblings of a jaded celeb. Brand leaves you in little doubt that he is trying to escape the ennui that follows trying everything once except incest and folk dancing. “It’s only because I decimated my life by aggressively pursuing eating, wanking, drinking, consuming and getting famous that I was forced to look at spiritual alternatives.” Inspiring a revolution – for such is his ambition – is one of the few thrills to have escaped him. “The revolution cannot be boring,” he says as he encapsulates his thoughtlessness in one phrase. “We’d all be a bit disappointed if utopia and ditching capitalism boiled down to ‘We want to be a bit more like Germany’ – fuck that.”
His writing is atrocious: long-winded, confused and smug; filled with references to books Brand has half read and thinkers he has half understood. At one point, he discusses whether our perception of reality is a mentally constructed illusion (don’t ask me why). “So,” Brand says in a conclusion worthy of a Thought for the Day vicar, “when Elton John said Marilyn Monroe was ‘like a candle in the wind’ he was probably bloody right, and if he wasn’t we’ll never know.” At another, Brand argues that spirituality is the road to revolution, a belief that would have baffled every revolutionary leader in modern European history. 

“We’re all doing the same thing, dreaming the same dream, in the words of Belinda Carlisle,” he announces in a sentence that is so syrupy a Barbie doll might have written it, and worse – much worse – misquotes Ms Carlisle."

This is the exact same thinking behind mindless, suicidal statements like "The Interests of the United States and Israel are one and the same - they are identical", or produces acronymical, pneumonic groupings such as "LGBTQ", as if they political, needs, demand and agenda of Lesbians, Transgender persons and Bi-Curious males teenagers were one and the same, and must unite together in common struggle - just as the greatest enemy and the greatest threat to Judaism and people of the Jewish religion is Zionism, the greatest threat to homosexuals, bisexuals, transgender persons and those who are simply not sure is The Gay Community, radically politicised (mostly male) homosexuals - and one place that politics has no place, is during sex.

Many decades ago, the Zionist Movement, represented by the Zionist International and the World Zionist Congress (in Geneva, right next door to all those Nazi  bank vaults and Allan Dulles' ratline for Der Spinne - doesn't appear to have been an issue, Mein Herr), infiltrated and took effective control of every major Jewish Organisation in existence - they did not bother to inform the Jews.
30 or 40 years ago, political homosexuality infiltrated every university and college campus  where homosexuality is practiced, pondered or considered, and began demanding things - increasingly unreasonable things, with the most radical conservative and fascist elements predominating. Whilst I was at Sheffield University, the LGB (they had not yet added the T or the B) successfully forced the Students' Union to ban the music of Eminem from ALL Union club nights and from all events held on Union premises - all of my gay friends at the time loved Eminem and thought this was both stupid and embarrassing, but were not sufficiently angered or disturbed by it to actually feel the need to correct it; in fact, at that time, I was briefly involved in an abortive attempt, via entryism to infiltrate the LGB, table a reversal motion, and then (potentially) table a secondary motion to disband the LGB for to remainder of the academic year.

It was at that time, I came into contact with those forces who were in effective control of the LGB, the elite Fascist, counter-revolutionary (all White, all super-rich) vanguard.
They did not, and never have, demanded a ban on SkrewDriver (for instance), since SkrewDriver's music is not only racist, sexist and homophobic, it's also awful and not popular. 
Eminem was popular, but also funny, witty, populist and often polemical - M was a great mobiliser, especially of disconnected and disillusioned White Youth - he was investigated and questioned by both the FBI and Secret Service when he brought out Mosh, suggesting that assassinating Bush might be an effective means of either exacting penance or forcing a back down from the ongoing Iraq War in 2004 - something the New Left never would have advocated;  no-one from that camp would have seriously advocated the assassination of Nixon or Reagan, for instance. 
They just refuse to wash and then sing at them.
Another example : Wonder Woman is a feminist icon; Wonder Woman appeared on the front cover of women's liberation rag Ms., edited by Gloria Steinham, who effectively married into the CIA.
But Wonder Woman was created to celebrate and promote female submission.

"Confinement to WW and the Amazons is just a sporting game, an actual enjoyment of being subdued. This, my dear friend, is the one truly great contribution of my Wonder Woman strip to moral education of the young. The only hope for peace is to teach people who are full of pep and unbound force to enjoy being bound. Women are exciting for this one reason – it is the secret of women's allure – women enjoy submission, being bound. This I bring out in the Paradise Island sequences where the girls beg for chains and enjoy wearing them."

“A really efficient totalitarian state would be one in which the all-powerful executive of political bosses and their army of managers control a population of slaves who do not have to be coerced, because they love their servitude.”

― Aldous Huxley, Brave New World

Here, Huxley defines the essence of Utopian culture; and of Utopian Counter-Culture :

"'Even Epsilons are useful'! So am I. And I damned well wish I weren't!"

Lenina was shocked by his blasphemy. "Bernard!" She protested in a voice of amazed distress. "How can you?"

In a different key, "How can I?" he repeated meditatively. "No, the real problem is: How is it that I can't, or rather–because, after all, I know quite well why I can't–what would it be like if I could, if I were free–not enslaved by my conditioning."

"But, Bernard, you're saying the most awful things."

"Don't you wish you were free, Lenina?"

"I don't know what you mean. I am free. Free to have the most wonderful time. Everybody's happy nowadays."

He laughed, "Yes, 'Everybody's happy nowadays.' We begin giving the children that at five."

To rebel against ones conditioning is not enough - Brand X evokes Huxley in that he seeks to have the masses perceive it as a goal in and of itself.

It's intrinsically Oedipal, and so has total, resonant appeal to callow youth, who don't know anything, seeking to find an identity. The Dupe-a-Mob.

Give them some money, some flags and some drugs and you have a colour revolution, based on nothing, corralling mass mobilisation from people who don't believe in anything and don't know what they want, other than to oppose.

The Colour Revolution of 2015

"The hope was that Ron Paul could attract between 10% and 15% of Republican voters, thus making sure that these votes would be taken off the table and put into a deep freeze where they could never benefit a candidate with a serious chance of  winning

Ron Paul would lock up this 10% to 15% and essenially take it off the table.

Ron Paul proved able to fulfil this function."

He's the boyfriend of Princess Diana's sister.

Does he talk about the Royal murder plot?

No, he does not.

He's the former common-law brother-in-law of a Rothschild.

Does he talk about Zionism? Does he talk about British Israelism?

No, he does not.

He's the ex-husband of the Mind Control Pop Princess Queen of the World.

Does he talk about Project Monarch?

No, he does not.

He talks about what Hugo Boss did in the 1930s.

He talks about Transidental Meditation.

He talks about Global Warming. Which isn't happening.

He talks about the poor - he talks about poor whites, he talks about poor blacks.

Does he talk about Imperialism? Does he talk about Churchill?

No, he does not.

He serves the same function as Ron Paul - to take angry young people, pissed off at Capitalism and Imperialism, isolate them and make them politically impotent and cynical.

What you learn from him is "action is futile", "make no demands"and "do not join an organisation, because you will be co-opted".

It's a Rent-a-Mob or a Dupe-a-Mob

You get a bunch of young people, some people that know virtually nothing, and you give them some drugs, some flags - some money, possibly - and they will come into the main square and oppose...


No fewer than twenty debates among the Republican presidential candidates stretched across most of the year 2011. The one constant of all of these debates was that Ron Paul consistently ran interference for Romney.  The basis of Ron Paul's technique was to mn from an evaluation of who the most dangerous adversery for Romney was in a given situation.  A study by Think Progress showed that Ron Paul had attacked Bachman once,  Cain four times, Rick Perry four times, Gingrich  eight times, and Santorum 22 times.   

But Ron Paul had never but never assailed Romney.  

Not reflected in the study was the critical timing of Paul's attacks, which generally came at moments when Romney was already under fire, and his bitter rivals were trying to gang up on the Bishop to administer a knock-out blow. Because of the animus against Romney, there was often a grave risk that the entire Republican pack would join in tearing down the assumed front-runner

For example, in the October 18, 2011 GOP presidential debate, Rick Perry began criticizing Romney for his Massachusetts individual mandate health plan, which he referred to as "Romneycare." Ron
Paul immediately went into action, counterattacking the vexed governor : "First off, you know, the governor of Texas criticized the govenor of Massachusetts for Romneycare, but he wrote a really fancy letter supporting Hillarycare. So we probably ought to ask him about that."

When the actual voting began, Romney's more urgent need was for a wingman on his right flank.

Here, Romney had to make sure that reactionary candidates like Gingrich, Santorum, Bachmann, and Cain could never get more than 40% of the votes and become competitive with Romney.  The ideal choice was still Ron Paul. The hope was that Ron Paul could attract between 10% and 15% of Republican voters, thus making sure that these votes would be taken off the table and put into a deep freeze where they could never benefit a candidate with a serious chance of  winning

Ron Paul would lock up this 10% to 15% and essenially take it off the table.

Ron Paul proved able to fulfil  this function.  In the primaries and caucuses of the early states, Romney racked up slightly less than 41% of the votes.  Ron Paul provided decisive help by attracting a little
over 11% if Republicans. This configuration allowed Romney to win all but four of the contests between the Iowa caucus un January 3 and Washington State on March 3. Romney was significantly helped in the Iowa caucuses by hundreds of thousands of dollars of ads attacking Gingrich that were paid forby Ron Paul.


After the present writer exposed and denounced the Romney-Ron Paul alliance at the time of the Bilderberg meeting in Virginia, on June 8, 2012, Joel Skousen joined Stan Monteith in devoting an
entire radio program to attempt to discredit the present writer. In good JBS-Monnon tradition, they focused on the accusation of "socialism."

Romneys choice of Paul Ryan for Vice President therefore reflects and expresses the role of the John Birch Society in spreading the ideology of right-wing Mormonism far beyond the confines off the
Mormon confession.   In the Romney-Ryan ticket, we see a combination of Mormonisms reactionary mainstream, supplemented by its most robust ideological tentacle. This may explain why commentators repeatedly cited the excellent pelsona1 chemistry between Mitt and the young congressman. They End each other congenial because they both derive from the same ideological


The Republican presidential primary contest effectively ended on April  10 [2012],  when  the  clerical-authoritarian  candidate  Santorum announced that he was dropping out.  It was a case of Santorums
right-wing Jesuit networks being busted by a combination of Mormon and Scottish Rite Southern Jurisdiction freemasons in the form off the Romney and Ron Paul campaigns.  The futurologist Newt Gingrich had run only a token campaign after March 27, when he lost the Louisiana primary, but he too dropped out on May 2 after losing in Delaware.

The Romney forces therefore could have used May and June, the last two months of the Republican primary season, to begin projecting a positive image off their candidate, necessarily including some specific ideas about what a Romney presidency might do for the United States.  But Romneys handlers refused to use this opportunity. They were dominated by the obsessively held idea, repeated ad infinitum by media commentaries over many months, that the 2012 presidential election  will  be exclusively a  referendum on  Obama, with the popularity and policies of the Republican nominee playing no role whatsoever.

Because of this amateurish misconception, the Romney campaign stagnated in May, June, and July of 2012, when Romney backers had hoped to build up an insuperable lead over the feckless Obama.


Ty Romney is an attorney handling property and liability claims for State Farm Mutual in Great Falls, Montana and received his Bachelors of Arts Degree from the University of Utah and his Juris Doctorate Degree from Seattle University School of Law. He is an active member of the Idaho State Bar Association.

Ty said, “Ron Paul is honest. It’s time to take a stand for honesty. It doesn’t matter whether the truth is popular or not, I know that Ron Paul will always maintain a true principle and I endorse that degree of integrity.”

Travis Romney is a chiropractor based in Spokane, Washington, and will be speaking at the Greyhound Park caucus location in Kootenai County. With his dad a second cousin to Mitt Romney, Travis is a second cousin once removed.

“I support Ron Paul because he defends the Constitution, loves America and understands what it means to be an American, including the right to live your life any way you want as long as you respect others,” said Travis. He continued, “I love his foreign policy of maintaining peace and trade while making a strong national defense a top priority, and that you only go to war legally through a declaration by the people through their elected representatives.”

Also sharing common ancestry, Chad Romney resides in the Boise area and will be speaking at the Glenns Ferry caucus location in Elmore County.

Jared Romney, out of Salt Lake City, said his grandfather is a first cousin with former Michigan Governor George Romney, the father of Mitt Romney, and stated, “It really comes down to Ron Paul championing the ideas of the Constitution, in how he lives it, understanding we must return to and follow its guiding principles. He also understands we must reign in the Federal ReserveSystem which is destroying our economy.”

Troy Romney also lives in Salt Lake City and is a University of Utah student, and will be speaking at the Montpelier caucus location in Bear Lake County. Troy’s grandfather and George Romney are cousins as well. Troy said he supports Ron Paul because “he stands for the values and principles America was founded upon.”

These family member endorsements are preceded by an announcement of support for Ron Paul by Rick Santorum’s nephew, John Garver.

Concerning the active “Latter-day Saints for Ron Paul” coalition, this announcement follows the high-profile endorsements of Overstock.com President Jonathan Johnson, prominent author and chair of the Utah Tenth Amendment Center Connor Boyack, and that of Utah Republican Liberty Caucus Chair Darcy Van Orden.

All such announcements help present Ron Paul as the conservative alternative to Mitt Romney and demonstrate that no presidential candidate has a monopoly on this crucial western states voter segment or even, for that matter, the Romney family.

As a function of this announcement, the above-mentioned persons now are members of the “Latter-day Saints for Ron Paul” nationwide coalition.

Dr. Tarpley:  This is called hypocrisy; this is called double standards...

In terms of what to do… right now we have a very interesting possibility that’s opened up in the Congress. We have a Republican Congressman from North Carolina, Walter Jones – fairly obscure backbencher, very conservative, a right winger – but he’s done something useful, he has submitted a resolution to the House of Representatives, which formally warns Obama saying, if you start any other war…

Really he (Obama) escalated Pakistan into a completely new war and he’s also attacked Libya and he’s essentially running wild in the lakes district of Africa in the area around Uganda where we have so much attention…

But the resolution says, “Obama, if you insist on an attack, you will be impeached”. Now, obviously at this point, all eyes turn to Ron Paul the member of the House of Representatives – the only one who is running for president who could really put this resolution on the map since he gets to take part in the nationwide cable television and even broadcast television debates.
So what’s going on right now is a campaign on the internet to force Ron Paul to get over whatever problem he has and come out forcefully – not with a throw away line; not with lip service – but to make the purpose of his presidential campaign from now on to get this Walter Jones resolution passed and send it on to the Senate. But of course once it’s passed the House, that’s enough, because that’s where impeachment occurs.

Ron Paul up to now seems to be more interested in his dirty deal with Romney whereby Ron Paul would give his delegates to Romney and Rand Paul might become – the son of the current candidate and currently a Senator – might become vice president on a Romney ticket.

That’s not good enough. 

The Daily Telegraph, MI6 and The Clintons

Ambrose Evans-Pritchard of The Sunday Telegraph and MI6
Like Rupert Giles - only evil.

"I'll give him his term, then I'm coming back." 
"I'll give him his term, then I'm coming back." 

- Former Director of Central Intelligence George H.W Bush,
Upon arrival in Austin, Tx.
January 20th 1992

"Those fools who will think they are repeating the opinion of a newspaper of their own camp will be repeating our opinion or any opinion that seems desirable for us. 

In the vain belief that they are following the organ of their party they will, in fact, follow the flag which we hang out for them.”

The Grid of Opression 
of the Blue Levels of Police and Freemasonry

One of only two known flags to state the territorial claims and objectives of its movement within the layout of the ensign.

The British Arab Bureau Bernard Lewis-Chaim Weizmann-Yinon Plan
Total Zionist Control between the Nile and the Euphrates.

EIR Volume 24, Number 3, January 10, 1997

The Hollinger role in Clintongate 
The first major "Whitewater" story was published by the New  York Times on March 8, 1992, during the Presidential primary  season. But it wasn't until December 1993, near the end of  President Bill Clinton's first year in the White House, that a serious effort to destroy Clinton, and the institution of the 
U.S. Presidency itself, got under way. 

The impetus for this sustained "Whitewater" assault on the Presidency, which is now continuing into Clinton's second term, did not come from within the United States: It originated in London, from a small but powerful financial group which specializes in economic warfare and control of the news media. This British and Canadian cabal, friends of Henry Kissinger and Margaret Thatcher operating under the name of "Hollinger, Inc.," also has massive ties to the drug trade and offshore banking, and is extensively penetrated into Israeli, as well as into U.S. "neo-conservative" journalistic circles. 

The Whitewater affair 
Whitewater kicked off in late December 1993, with publication of the lurid January "Troopergate" issue of the American Spectator, a relatively insignificant U.S. publication, but one with multiple ties to the British Hollinger Group. "Troopergate" was quickly picked up by Cable News Network and ABC-TV, and burgeoned into a national news story. For months after that, the London Sunday Telegraph ran weekly attacks on Clinton, which were laundered through allied outlets in the United States, particularly the Moonie-financed Washington Times and the Wall Street Journal. Between November 1993 and March 1994, Washington correspondent Ambrose Evans-Pritchard wrote at least 20 stories for the Sunday Telegraph. 

By Jan. 23,1994, Hollinger's Sunday Telegraph had announced its intention to force Clinton out of office before the end of the year. The Telegraph's leading role in Clintongate was proudly acknowledged by Emmett Tyrrell, the Anglophile editor-in-chief of the American Spectator, who lauded 
the Sunday Telegraph's Evans-Pritchard, as having been "particularly tireless in examining those scandals." 

Then, the Sunday Telegraph ran a feature boosting Tyrrell. "There has always been a strong British connection" to the American Spectator, the Sunday Telegraph gushed, pointing out that its Washington bureau chief, Tom Bethell, is English, and that Sir Peregrine Worsthorne, the chief columnist for the Sunday Telegraph, is an active member of the Spectator's editorial board. Worsthorne himself praised his friend "Bob" Tyrrell, whom he described as "masterminding the campaign which is beginning to look like it might do for Clinton what the Washington Post did for Nixon." 

Hollinger's tentacles 
Hollinger founder and current chairman and CEO Conrad Black is a protege of E.P. Taylor, head of Economic Warfare of the British Special Operations Executive (SOE) during World War II. Taylor. among his other credits, wrote the banking law of the Cayman Islands-a center of Hollinger's offshore operations, and a notorious hot-money-laundering center. 

Hollinger's four flagship publications are: the Telegraphthe Jerusalem Post (which has been turned into a mouthpiece for Ariel Sharon), the Financial Post (Canada's equivalent of the Wall Street Journal), and the Caymanian Compass. 

Hollinger owns 80 newspapers in the United States, including three in Arkansas, and the Chicago Sun Times. Hollinger's board of directors includes Conrad Black, R. Donald Fullerton (CEO of Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, the SOE's flagship bank in Canada), and Paul Reichmann (the Canadian who is now running speculator George Soros's real estate empire). Peter Bronfman (chairman of Edper, the Bronfman family's real estate conglomerate), who died in December 1996, was also a Hollinger board member. 

Hollinger's international advisory board includes Baroness Thatcher, Lord Peter Carrington, and Henry Kissinger, as senior advisers; Dwayne Andreas, of the Archer Daniels Midland food conglomerate, a major funder of the AntiDefamation League; David Brinkley; former National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski; William F. Buckley, one of the principal sponsors of Emmett Tyrrell; Sir James Goldsmith; Richard Perle, former Zionist mole in the U.S. Defense Department; Lord Rothschild; former U.S. Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker; and columnist George F. Will. 

Several other leading Bronfman assets, including former Canadian ambassador in Washington Allan E. Gottlieb and Pierre Des Marais II, are also directors of Hollinger. Lord Weidenfeld *, an old crony of Kissinger and the head of the Institute for Jewish Affairs in London (a joint Anti-Defamation League-World Jewish Congress front), is also a director of the Jerusalem Post, along with Perle

[ * Weidenfeld is also the original English language publisher and copyright holderof Hitler's Table Talk, as well as acting as an  intermediary between Harold Wilson and the MI5/Mountbatten coup Faction during the period 1968-1976; according to Wilson, cited in the Pencourt File, it was Widenfeld who acted as a back channel reaching out to the CIA in 1976, carrying messages to DCI George H.W. Bush to call off the hit on 1974-79 Wilson-Callaghan Labour Government.

 David Irving also has stated for the record that George Weidenfeld secretly had to write a cheque in the mid-1950s for a HUGE sum of money, payable to Paula Hitler for the English-Language publishing rights to Hitler's Table Talk] 

Directors of the Telegraph, a wholly owned Hollinger subsidiary, include Rupert Hambro, managing director of Hambro Bank, the main SOE-Iinked bank during World War II and beyond, and Henry Keswick, chairman of Jardine Matheson, the original Dope, Inc. trading company. The Keswick family profile is revealed in Dope, Inc. (Washington, D.C.: Executive Intelligence Review, 1992), and traces back to the nineteenth-century British Opium Wars against China."

  • Subject: Was There A Conspiracy? 
    24 Mar 2002
    Yes, Hillary, there is a conspiracy, a vast right-wing conspiracy, but it goes way beyond the goons who tried to discredit your husband and even beyond Mellon-Scaife and the other funders of the conservative propaganda machine. I saw Brock on C-SPAN today, and was bemused by his shocked recognition, after years of toadying, that these reactionary goons will lie, cheat, steal and smear. But the real conspiracy behind "Monicagate" (around here is was called "Zippergate") was centered in the two women who began the scandal and exposed the affair:
    Linda Tripp (GS-13 Army Intelligence, White House leftover from the Bush years, former personal secretary to Richard Secord and the Delta Force covert operations that led into Contragate), who began taping her calls from Monica.
    Lucianne Goldberg (North American Newspaper Alliance stringer/operative). NANA was a spy operation since it's formation by Ian Fleming's British Intelligence circle, postwar US intelligence figure Ernest Cuneo -- mentor to Drew Pearson and Jack Anderson, the masters of selective declassification -- and Texas oil man Ivor Bryce, when Lucianne's husband Sidney Goldberg was hired by Fleming to be the "Russian desk". Sidney in turn employed Priscilla Johnson (later McMillan) to interview the "defector" Lee Harvey Oswald in Moscow, at the urging of her Office of Naval Intelligence plant at the US Embassy there, Richard Snyder, and also Aline Mosby, who did a similar job establishing ONI "defector" Oswald's credentials. Lucianne continued planting disinformation through NANA, took a job with the Watergate CREEPs, working to dig out dirt on Nixon's political opponents in the 1972 election, and more recently served as a publicity agent for LAPD racist cop Mark Furman in the OJ Simpson spectacle.
    These two are part of the real conspiracy, the assassination by innuendo and scandal of a President, by two experienced intelligence handlers. Monica may have been victim or ally, it remains to be seen. The right wing was more than happy to pick up the trail and send in the bloodhounds, and no doubt were contacted to do just that. But the removal of a President from office is not left to the dogs, they send in the professionals. As always, there is more to the story. But on Clinton's inauguration day, George H W Bush, known as "Poppy" to the family, left town and the White House saying, "I'll give him his term, then I'm coming back." And, here we are.
    Was there a Conspiracy? 
    by Denis Mueller, March 2002 

“8. Literature and journalism are two of the most important educative forces, and therefore our government will become proprietor of the majority of the journals. This will neutralize the injurious influence of the privately-owned press and will put us in possession of a tremendous influence upon the public mind …. If we give permits for ten journals, we shall ourselves found thirty, and so on in the same proportion. 

This, however, must in no wise be suspected by the public. For which reason all journals published by us will be of the most opposite, in appearance, tendencies and opinions, thereby creating confidence in us and bringing over to us quite unsuspicious opponents, who will thus fall into our trap and be rendered harmless.

9. In the front rank will stand organs of an official character. They will always stand guard over our interests, and therefore their influence will be comparatively insignificant.

10. In the second rank will be the semi-official organs, whose part it will be to attack the tepid and indifferent.

11. In the third rank we shall set up our own, to all appearance, opposition, which, in at least one of its organs, will present what looks like the very antipodes to us. Our real opponents at heart will accept this simulated opposition as their own and will show us their cards.

12. All our newspapers will be of all possible complexions — aristocratic, republican, revolutionary, even anarchical – for so long, of course, as the constitution exists …. Like the Indian idol “Vishnu” they will have a hundred hands, and every one of them will have a finger on any one of the public opinions as required. 

When a pulse quickens these hands will lead opinion in the direction of our aims, for an excited patient loses all power of judgment and easily yields to suggestion. 

Those fools who will think they are repeating the opinion of a newspaper of their own camp will be repeating our opinion or any opinion that seems desirable for us. 

In the vain belief that they are following the organ of their party they will, in fact, follow the flag which we hang out for them.”

We Don't Need No Water, 
Let the Motherfucker Burn...