NATO Fighters Down German Passenger Plane

"The autopilot on the doomed Germanwings plane that crashed into the Alps was abruptly switched to descend to 100 feet, according to a new report Thursday.

FlightRadar24, an online tracking service that uses satellite data, found evidence the autopilot was adjusted to its lowest setting before the plane started its steady fall from the sky, Reuters reported.

FlightRadar said its review of data showed the autopilot was manually changed from 38,000 feet to 100 feet and 9 seconds later the aircraft started to descend, probably with the “open descent” autopilot setting, the firm’s CEO Fredrik Lindahl said. The plane slammed into a mountain at 6,000 feet, killing 150 people."

schizophrenia

ˌskɪtsə(ʊ)ˈfriːnɪə/

noun

1. a long-term mental disorder of a type involving a breakdown in the relation between thought, emotion, and behaviour, leading to faulty perception, inappropriate actions and feelings, withdrawal from reality and personal relationships into fantasy and delusion, and a sense of mental fragmentation.

   • (in general use) a mentality or approach characterized by inconsistent or contradictory elements.

     "Gibraltar's schizophrenia continues to be fed by colonial pride"

     Webster Tarpley on the Charlie Hebdo Killings in their Geopolitical Context from Spike EP on Vimeo.

     "There were, what? Thirty-five attempts on the life of General DeGaulle...? Standing up for the dignity of France, and standing in defiance of being the battlefield for a Limited Nuclear War... He was therefore targetted by, in effect, the NATO Establishment, and the same can be said of the Aldo Moro case in Italy...." - Tarpley

     
     

http://www.jimstone.is/a320crash.html

HERE WE HAVE THE EDITED REPORT, WITH THE FIGHTER JETS REMOVED. If they get put back into the story and lies are hatched for damage control it is TOO LATE, the fact they chose to expunge this information irrevocably proves they never wanted these fighter jets to be mentioned, and THAT SAYS IT ALL. TOO LATE, BUSTED:

So now we have:

1. Plane took forever to crash and pilots never contacted the tower. That is a huge mystery, even according to the tower. 

2. An Airbus with a remote control option.
3. Fighter jet escorts, along with a very good description about how they appeared (they were not UFO's)
4. A redaction of the fighter jet escorts.
LOGICAL OUTPUT: 
1. The pilots never contacted the tower because 
2. The fighter jets prevented it by either jamming communications off or 
3. turning them off via remote control, and then crashing the jet via remote. 
4. Expungement of the fighter jets from the news reports NAILS IT ALL, THIS ONE IS SHOT DEAD AND SERVED COLD.
5. REMOTE CONTROL WAS USED TO ELIMINATE A SEPARATE DEBRIS FIELD WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY A SHOOT DOWN AND RAISED QUESTIONS.

AND NOW THE BIG QUESTION IS: WHO WAS ON THAT PLANE?

GERMAN AIRBUS CRASH IN FRANCE - Last Message of "EMERGENCY, EMERGENCY" from Spike EP on Vimeo.

• WHITE HOUSE: NO INDICATION OF TERRORISM IN AIRPLANE CRASH

" The A320 that crashed on Tuesday was operated by Germanwings, a low-cost carrier operated by Lufthansa, and had 150 people on board. The French president said there were probably no survivors.

The aircraft had been in service for 24 years. Airbus said that it had accumulated more than 58,000 flight hours over more than 46,000 flights. A Germanwings official told reporters that the last routine maintenance check was performed on Monday.

The A320 is sophisticated, one of the first highly computerized, or fly-by-wire, planes in service. Because the crash did not happen on takeoff or landing, whatever happened was probably sudden and catastrophic, air safety experts said. "

NBC

The Airbus A320 is now equipped with a full Autoland system as standard.

I quote an airline pilot :

" Autoland is a function that uses the whole autoflight system to automatically land the aircraft. Rollout is a ground directional control mode that lives within the autoflight system. There are autoland systems that disconnect at touchdown and don’t have a rollout mode, so they don’t have to go together.

Autoland is the whole function…it’s going to include ILS tracking during the approach (lateral-directional and pitch control), x-wind compensation and flare on final, potentially rollout after touchdown, and maybe assorted automatic stopping function (autospoilers, autobrakes, brake-to-vacate, etc.) depending on the aircraft. Rollout is the specific control mode that’s used to control direction (centerline) after touchdown.

To summarize: you can have autoland with no rollout capability, but you can’t have rollout without an autoland. Rollout, therefore, is a control mode of the autoland system, which is a function of the autoflight system.The idea is to continue keeping the Aircraft aligned to the runway after touchdown. "

Autopilot on doomed German plane reportedly set to crash

New details on co-pilot accused of crashing Germanwings jet

The autopilot on the doomed Germanwings plane that crashed into the Alps was abruptly switched to descend to 100 feet, according to a new report Thursday.

FlightRadar24, an online tracking service that uses satellite data, found evidence the autopilot was adjusted to its lowest setting before the plane started its steady fall from the sky, Reuters reported.

French prosecutors said Andreas Lubitz, the 28-year-old who officials locked the pilot out of the Germanwings cockpit and then calmly slammed the plane into a mountainside at 430 miles per hour. He reportedly battled burnout and depression in 2009, while training to realize his dream of flying.

FlightRadar said its review of data showed the autopilot was manually changed from 38,000 feet to 100 feet and 9 seconds later the aircraft started to descend, probably with the “open descent” autopilot setting, the firm’s CEO Fredrik Lindahl said. The plane slammed into a mountain at 6,000 feet, killing 150 people.

Lindahl said FlightRadar24 shared its findings with French crash investigators.

With no apparent ties to terrorism, authorities were focusing Thursday on the mental state of the German co-pilot believed to have intentionally crashed a plane into the French Alps Tuesday, killing all 150 aboard.

It was not known if Lubitz' mental issues continued to plague him years later, but new clues could emerge from searches that took place Thursday at a Dusseldorf apartment Libitz maintained as well as at his parents' home in Montabaur, a small town in western Germany.

French prosecutor Robin Brice insisted Thursday that Lubitz had no known ties to terrorism that could explain the act.

"A terrorist?" he said in response to a question. "Absolutely not."

Three Americans were among those killed, including Yvonne and Emily Selke, a mother and daughter from Virginia, and Robert Oliver, whose name, but no further details, was released Thursday by the State Department.

Clues from the Airbus 320's cockpit voice recorder painted a partial picture of a calm and calculated effort by Lubitz. As the plane left Barcelona, Lubitz and Capt. Patrick Sonderheimer chatted amiably. But as the plane neared cruising altitude of 38,000 feet, Lubitz's replies became more clipped. And when Sonderheimer rose to leave the cockpit, likely to use the restroom, Lubitz appeared to put his deadly plan into action.

"I'm leaving you in charge," Sonderheimer said.

Robin said in a Paris that the evidence from the cockpit voice recorder, one of two "black boxes" and the only one recovered so far, indicates Lubitz refused to open the cabin door when Sonderheimer returned, beginning the 8-minute descent "manually and intentionally."

Robin said the commander of the plane knocked several times "without response." He said the door could only be blocked manually.

The information was pulled from the black box cockpit voice recorder, but Robin said the co-pilot did not say a word after the commanding pilot left the cockpit.

"It was absolute silence in the cockpit," he said.

Screams can be heard from passengers in the final seconds of their lives, officials said. 

It was the co-pilot's "intention to destroy this plane," Robin said. The recorder captured his normal breathing patterns, suggesting Lubitz was not incapacitated.

"It wasn't the breath of somebody who was struggling,” the prosecutor said. “He didn't say a single word. Total silence."

Asked when passengers realized their fate, Robin said, "We only hear screams at the very end. Death was instant.”

During the final minutes of the flight's descent, pounding could be heard on the cockpit door as plane alarms sounded, but the co-pilot's breathing was normal throughout the whole time, Robin said.

"It's obvious this co-pilot took advantage of the commander's absence. Could he have known he would leave? It is too early to say," he said.

Lufthansa CEO Carsten Spohr said the airline was already "appalled" by what happened in its low-cost subsidiary.

"I could not have imagined that becoming even worse," Spohr said in Cologne. "We choose our cockpit staff very, very carefully."

In the German town of Montabaur, acquaintances told The Associated Press that Lubitz showed no signs of depression when they saw him last fall as he renewed his glider pilot's license.

"He was happy he had the job with Germanwings and he was doing well," said a member of the glider club, Peter Ruecker, who watched Lubitz learn to fly. "He gave off a good feeling."

Lubitz, 28, joined Germanwings in September 2013, directly after training which included a stint at a facility near Phoenix, Aiz., and had flown 630 hours. Lufthansa chief executive Carsten Spohr described both pilots as "experienced and trained."

Robin said the Germanwings plane's second black box still had not been found but remains of the victims were being collected and DNA identification had begun.

The plane was about halfway through its flight when it descended from a cruising altitude of 38,000 feet to around 6,000 feet in approximately eight minutes. During that time, the co-pilot did not respond to radio calls from French air traffic controllers, who alerted authorities when the plane disappeared from their radar screens.

The Wall Street Journal, citing Airbus training materials, reported that many Airbus jets are fitted with crew-controlled locks designed to prevent unauthorized access to the flight deck. In some planes, the cockpit can be accessed through a keypad code, but pilots can also lock out external access for five minutes or longer by flipping a certain switch in the cockpit.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Lufthansa Airbus crash in the Alps. Same pattern as the others.

It seems a switch can be flipped, power to the aircraft gets cut off, and without power, the plane inevitably crashes.  Is this the standard method of country control now?  Aircraft all have a kill switch, operable by the CIA/Mossad.  It gets used as  a way to pressure the nations into line.  I feel for the families who lost so many children today.

While the White House, seemingly an expert in determining airplane crashes causes within hours if not minutes of the accident (see flight MH-17)  has already opined on the tragic crash of the Lufthansa Germanwings airplane:

• WHITE HOUSE: NO INDICATION OF TERRORISM IN AIRPLANE CRASH

This will hardly be comfort to the families of the 148 people who lost their lives the crash which took place in the south Franch alps, and where the first images of the debris have just been released, via Airlive.net

Further evidence that the airplane crash was not a midair disintegration is that while the vertical airspeed was susbtantial, it wasn’t freefall, and it took the airplane about 10 minutes to drop from a height of 11.5 to its final resting place some 2 kilometers high in the alps (via Zeit).

And here are all the latest crash developments from AP:

A local lawmaker says the debris from the plane crash in the French Alps that killed all 150 people on board is spread over 100-200 meters (110-220 yards).

Gilbert Sauvan, president of the general council of the Alpes-de-Haute-Provence, told the AP that “everything is pulverized.”

He said the largest pieces of debris are the size of a small car.

Sauvan said no one can access the site from the ground, but that helicopters are circling the area to get information and 500 firefighters and gendarmes are in the area.

The boss of airline Germanwings says the plane went into a long descent before it crashed into the French Alps, likely killing all 150 people on board.

Germanwings CEO Thomas Winkelmann said the plane began descending again shortly after it reached its cruising height following takeoff from Barcelona Airport. The descent lasted eight minutes, he told reporters in Cologne. Radar and air traffic control contact broke off at 10:53 a.m.

He said the pilot had more than 10 years’ experience working for Germanwings and its parent airline Lufthansa. Airbus said the A320 was delivered to Lufthansa in 1991.

Germanwings said the passenger manifest included two babies. Officials believe there were 67 German nationals on board.

JIM STONE EXTRACT –

To the idiots out there who might say “Oh, the conspiracy crowd solved this before a single investigator arrived at the crash scene:” There are only a few things you need to know to solve this one, the rest is just scammery:

1. The plane descended for 10 minutes, and NO WORD FROM THE PILOTS. How can that happen? Jamming of communications. Who could have jammed communications?

2. The fighter jets, which were following this Airbus. THEY could have jammed the communications with ease, AND shot it down. They probably did not shoot it down OR EVEN NEED TO JAM COMMUNICATIONS because:

3. The plane was equipped with remote control (for “hijack recovery”) AS A STANDARD FEATURE. That level of external control would make switching off communications via remote control a NO BRAINER.

NO CONTACT WITH THE TOWER SAYS IT ALL, A REMOTE CONTROLLED CRASH REALLY IS THE OVERWHELMING ANSWER.

Why would fighter jets be following at just the right time anyway? That alone CINCHES IT. We really do need to figure out who was on that plane.

BUSTED: CENSORSHIP OF NEWS PROVES THE FIGHTER JETS DID INDEED DOWN THIS GERMAN AIRCRAFT, IF THEY DID NOT, WHY EXPUNGE THE NEWS OF THEIR PRESENCE?

TAP – Jim explains the plane crashed at full throttle doing 600 mph, which suggests control of the aircraft from outside the plane.

Also There Was A US Spook On Board 

The mother, Yvonne Selke of Nokesville, Virginia, had worked for Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. in Washington for 23 years, and her daughter Emily Selke was a 2013 graduate of Drexel University in Philadelphia. According to the AP, Yvonne Selke worked under contract with the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, the satellite mapping office for the Department of Defense.

“Yvonne was a wonderful co-worker and a dedicated employee who spent her career with the firm,” Booz Allen’s chief personnel officer, Betty Thompson, told the AP.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/03/french-alps-crash-victims-yvonne-selke-emily-selke-116389.html

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/03/french-alps-crash-victims-yvonne-selke-emily-selke-116389.html

The Murdoch NYT reports – PARIS — As officials struggled Wednesday to explain why a jet with 150 people on board crashed amid a relatively clear sky, an investigator said evidence from a cockpit voice recorder indicated one pilot left the cockpit before the plane’s descent and was unable to get back in.

A senior military official involved in the investigation described “very smooth, very cool” conversation between the pilots during the early part of the flight from Barcelona, Spain, to Düsseldorf, Germany. Then the audio indicated that one of the pilots left the cockpit and could not re-enter.

“The guy outside is knocking lightly on the door, and there is no answer,” the investigator said. “And then he hits the door stronger, and no answer. There is never an answer.”

He said, “You can hear he is trying to smash the door down.”

While the audio seemed to give some insight into the circumstances leading to the Germanwings crash on Tuesday morning, it also left many questions unanswered.

David Cameron and the Telescreen State

David Cameron and the Telescreen State

from Spike EP on Vimeo.

David Cameron claims the absolute right of the British State to know and overhear absolutely everything about you, under any circumstances, through a system of bureaucratic oversight and administrative self-regulation.

Because, Charlie Hebdo.

THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF OLIGARCHICAL COLLECTIVISM
by Emmanuel Goldstein

Throughout recorded time, and probably since the end of the Neolithic Age, there have been three kinds of people in the world, the High, the Middle, and the Low. They have been subdivided in many ways, they have borne countless different names, and their relative numbers, as well as their attitude towards one another, have varied from age to age: but the essential structure of society has never altered. Even after enormous upheavals and seemingly irrevocable changes, the same pattern has always reasserted itself, just as a gyroscope will always return to equilibrium, however far it is pushed one way or the other.

The aims of these groups are entirely irreconcilable . . .


‘Julia, are you awake?’

No answer. She was asleep. He shut the book, put it carefully on the floor, lay down, and pulled the coverlet over both of them.

He had still, he reflected, not learned the ultimate secret. He understood HOW; he did not understand WHY.

Chapter I, like Chapter III, had not actually told him anything that he did not know, it had merely systematized the knowledge that he possessed already.

But after reading it he knew better than before that he was not mad.

Being in a minority, even a minority of one, did not make you mad.

There was truth and there was untruth, and if you clung to the truth even against the whole world, you were not mad.

A yellow beam from the sinking sun slanted in through the window and fell across the pillow. He shut his eyes. The sun on his face and the girl’s smooth body touching his own gave him a strong, sleepy, confident feeling. He was safe, everything was all right.

He fell asleep murmuring ‘Sanity is not statistical,’ with the feeling that this remark contained in it a profound wisdom.

The Illusion of Free Speech

"[Anti-Semitism] maintains conspiracy theories that spread without limits. Conspiracy theories that have, in the past, led to the worst "(...)" [The] answer is to realize that conspiracy theories are disseminated through the Internet and social networks. Moreover, we must remember that it is words that have in the past prepared extermination. 

We need to act at the European level, and even internationally, so that a legal framework can be defined, and so that Internet platforms that manage social networks are held to account and that sanctions be imposed for failure to enforce" 

President François Hollande

Remarks at the Shoah Memorial

January 27 2015 

"The Bardic tradition of magick would place a bard as being much higher and more fearsome than a magician.  A magician might curse you.  That might make your hands lay funny or you might have a child born with a club foot.  

If a Bard were to place not a curse upon you, but a satire, then that could destroy you.  

If it was a clever satire, it might not just destroy you in the eyes of your associates; it would destroy you in the eyes of your family.  It would destroy you in your own eyes.  

And if it was a finely worded and clever satire that might survive and be remembered for decades, even centuries.  

Then years after you were dead people still might be reading it and laughing at you and your wretchedness and your absurdity.  

Writers and people who had command of words were respected and feared as people who manipulated magic. "

- Alan Moore

French President François Hollande has condemned the violence, calling France’s commitment to freedom of expression "non-negotiable".

“There are tensions abroad where people don’t understand our attachment to freedom of speech,” Hollande said.

Image of a French police officer wearing a kepi at the Pithiviers deportation camp. 

This shot was censored in the original version of the film, Night and Fog (1955)

Image of a French police officer at the Pithiviers deportation camp. 

His kepi has been obscured by a wooden beam, at the behest of the French film censors. 

This shot appeared in the original version of the film Night and Fog (1955)

I Quote The Enemy:

"After the film was complete, producer Dauman told Resnais that he was "delighted to have produced the film", but that he guaranteed that "It will never see a theatrical release".

In December 1955, French censors wanted some scenes cut from Night and Fog.

The end of the film shows scenes of bodies being bulldozed into mass graves. These were considered too violent to be allowed in the film. Another point of contention was that Resnais had included photographs of French officers guarding a detention center, operated by the Vichy government and located in central France, where Jews were gathered before Deportation. 

This scene prompted a call demanding that the shot be cut because it "might be offensive in the eyes of the present-day military".

Resnais resisted this censorship, insisting that images of collaboration were important for the public to see.

When Resnais refused to cut the scene with the officer, the censors pressured that they would cut off the last ten minutes of his film.

Finally, to compromise, Resnais stated that obscuring the scene wouldn't change the meaning of the film to him, and he painted a beam that obscured the képi the officer was wearing.

In exchange, Resnais would be allowed to show the bodies at the end of the film, which was restored to its original form for a 2003 DVD release.

The second act of censorship in the film was a huge scandal with the German embassy in France asking for the film to be withdrawn from the Cannes Film Festival.

The French press reacted against the proposed withdrawal, noting that Cayrol and Resnais were very cautious in defining the difference between the Nazi criminals and the German people.

Articles were written in French magazines including Libération and L'Humanité, protesting any censorship of the film at Cannes.

One of the few writers who supported the withdrawal, Jean Dutourd, felt that Auschwitz and other concentration camps should be forgotten."

Dieudonne is living under daily threat of death from the French Branch of the Jewish Defence League (JDL) - recognised as so fascist that they are banned in the United States, and in Israel, following a failed assassination attempt on Congressman Darryl Issa (R-Ca.) in 2002.

But not in France.

Goddamn Vichyssoises...

LAW No 90-615 to repress acts of racism, anti-semitism and xenophobia (1990)

MODIFICATIONS OF THE LAW OF JULY 29, 1881 ON THE FREEDOM OF THE PRESS Art 8. - Article 24 of the Law on the Freedom of the Press of 29 July 1881 is supplemented by the following provisions: In the event of judgment for one of the facts envisaged by the preceding subparagraph, the court will be able moreover to order: Except when the responsibility for the author of the infringement is retained on the base for article 42 and the first subparagraph for article 43 for this law or the first three subparagraphs for article 93-3 for the law No 82-652 for July 29, 1982 on the audio-visual communication, the deprivation of the rights enumerated to the 2o and 3o of article 42 of the penal code for imprisonment of five years maximum;

Art 9. – As an amendment to Article 24 of the law of July 29, 1881 on the freedom of the press, article 24 (a) is as follows written: <<Art. 24 (a). - those who have disputed the existence of one or more crimes against humanitysuch as they are defined by Article 6 of the statute of the international tribunal military annexed in the agreement of London of August 8, 1945 and which were a carried out either by the members of an organization declared criminal pursuant to Article 9 of the aforementioned statute, or by a person found guilty such crimes by a French or international jurisdiction shall be punished by one month to one year's imprisonment or a fine.

Art 13. - It is inserted, after article 48-1 of the law of July 29, 1881 on the freedom of the press, article 48-2 thus written: <<Art. 48-2. - publication or publicly expressed opinion encouraging those to whom it is addressed to pass a favourable moral judgment on one or more crimes against humanity and tending to justify these crimes (including collaboration) or vindicate their perpetrators shall be punished by one to five years' imprisonment or a fine.

In France, the Gayssot Act, voted for on July 13, 1990, makes it illegal to question the existence of crimes that fall in the category of crimes against humanity as defined in the London Charter of 1945, on the basis of which Nazi leaders were convicted by the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg in 1945-46. 

When the act was challenged by Robert Faurisson, the Human Rights Committee upheld it as a necessary means to counter possible antisemitism. 

In 2012, the Constitutional Council of France ruled that to extend the Gayssot Act to the Armenian Genocide denial was unconstitutional because it violated the freedom of speech.

Interesting that the court ruled that Armenian Genocide Denial is an issue of "personal expression" (I.e. "Art"), rather than "freedom of speech" (dissemination of information) - the clear implication being that if you are conscious that you are MASSIVELY LYING about something that matters to relatively few people, that's protected speech and cannot be messed with, whereas telling the uncomfortable truth about an unpalatable truth that daily impacts on millions of lives in the Middle East and beyond assumes the mantle of State Secrecy.

Who understands The French, after all...?

On 23 December 2013, French President François Hollande said "We will act, with the government led by prime minister Jean-Marc Ayrault, to shake the tranquility which, under the cover of anonymity, facilitates shameful actions online. But also we will fight against the sarcasm of those who purport to be humorists but are actually professional anti-Semites."

In a statement on 27 December 2013, France's Interior Minister Manuel Valls said he would consider "all legal means" to ban Dieudonné's "public meetings," given that he "addresses in an obvious and insufferable manner the memory of victims of the Shoah."

JORF n° 0162 du 14 juillet 1990 page 8333 

LOI 

Loi n° 90-615 du 13 juillet 1990 tendant à réprimer tout acte raciste, antisémite ou xénophobe 

NOR: JUSX9010223L

ELI: Non disponible 

L'Assemblée nationale et le Sénat ont délibéré,
L'Assemblée nationale a adopté,
Le Président de la République promulgue la loi dont la teneur suit:

Art. 1er. - Toute discrimination fondée sur l'appartenance ou la non-appartenance à une ethnie, une nation, une race ou une religion est interdite.
L'Etat assure le respect de ce principe dans le cadre des lois en vigueur.

Art. 2. - Le 21 mars de chaque année, date retenue par l'Organisation des Nations Unies pour la Journée internationale pour l'élimination de toutes les formes de discrimination raciale, la Commission nationale consultative des droits de l'homme remet au Gouvernement un rapport sur la lutte contre le racisme. Ce rapport est immédiatement rendu public.

TITRE Ier

MODIFICATIONS DU CODE PENAL

Art. 3. - Il est inséré, après l'article 51 du code pénal, un article 51-1 ainsi rédigé:
<<Art. 51-1. - Dans les cas prévus par la loi, le tribunal pourra ordonner, aux frais du condamné, soit la publication intégrale ou partielle de sa décision, soit l'insertion d'un communiqué informant le public des motifs et du dispositif de celle-ci dans le Journal officiel de la République française ou dans un ou plusieurs journaux ou écrits périodiques qu'il désignera.
<<Le tribunal déterminera, le cas échéant, les extraits de la décision qui devront être publiés; il fixera les termes du communiqué à insérer.>>  

Art. 4. - Il est inséré, après l'article 187-2 du code pénal, un article 187-3 ainsi rédigé:
<<Art. 187-3. - En cas de condamnation prononcée en application des articles 187-1 ou 187-2, le tribunal pourra ordonner:

<<1o La privation des droits mentionnés aux 2o et 3o de l'article 42, pour une durée de cinq ans au plus;
<<2o L'affichage de sa décision dans les conditions prévues par l'article 51;
<<3o La publication de celle-ci ou l'insertion d'un communiqué dans les conditions prévues par l'article 51-1, sans que les frais de publication ou d'insertion puissent excéder le maximum de l'amende encourue.>>  

Art. 5. - Le dernier alinéa de l'article 416 du code pénal est abrogé.

Art. 6. - Il est inséré, après l'article 416-1 du code pénal, un article 416-2 ainsi rédigé:
<<Art. 416-2. - En cas de condamnation prononcée en application des articles 416 et 416-1, le tribunal pourra ordonner:
<<1o La privation des droits mentionnés aux 2o et 3o de l'article 42, pour une durée de cinq ans au plus;
<<2o L'affichage de sa décision dans les conditions prévues par l'article 51;
<<3o La publication de celle-ci ou l'insertion d'un communiqué dans les conditions prévues par l'article 51-1, sans que les frais de publication ou d'insertion puissent excéder le maximum de l'amende encourue.
<<Toutefois, en cas de condamnation en application des dispositions de l'article 416 relatives à l'état de santé ou au handicap, l'affichage ou la publication de la décision, ou l'insertion d'un communiqué, ne pourront comporter l'identité de la victime qu'avec son accord ou celui de son représentant légal.>> 

TITRE II

MODIFICATIONS DE LA LOI DU 29 JUILLET 1881

SUR LA LIBERTE DE LA PRESSE

Art. 7. - Il est inséré, après l'article 13 de la loi du 29 juillet 1881 sur la liberté de la presse, un article 13-1 ainsi rédigé:
<<Art. 13-1. - Le droit de réponse prévu par l'article 13 pourra être exercé par les associations remplissant les conditions prévues par l'article 48-1, lorsqu'une personne ou un groupe de personnes auront, dans un journal ou écrit périodique, fait l'objet d'imputations susceptibles de porter atteinte à leur honneur ou à leur réputation à raison de leur origine ou de leur appartenance ou de leur non-appartenance à une ethnie, une nation, une race ou une religion déterminée.
<<Toutefois, quand la mise en cause concernera des personnes considérées individuellement, l'association ne pourra exercer le droit de réponse que si elle justifie avoir reçu leur accord.
<<Aucune association ne pourra requérir l'insertion d'une réponse en application du présent article dès lors qu'aura été publiée une réponse à la demande d'une des associations remplissant les conditions prévues par l'article 48-1.>>  

Art. 8. - L'article 24 de la loi du 29 juillet 1881 sur la liberté de la presse est complété par les dispositions suivantes:
<<En cas de condamnation pour l'un des faits prévus par l'alinéa précédent, le tribunal pourra en outre ordonner:
<<1o Sauf lorsque la responsabilité de l'auteur de l'infraction est retenue sur le fondement de l'article 42 et du premier alinéa de l'article 43 de la présente loi ou des trois premiers alinéas de l'article 93-3 de la loi no 82-652 du 29 juillet 1982 sur la communication audiovisuelle, la privation des droits énumérés aux 2o et 3o de l'article 42 du code pénal pour une durée de cinq ans au plus;

<<2o L'affichage de sa décision dans les conditions prévues par l'article 51 du code pénal;
<<3o La publication de sa décision ou l'insertion d'un communiqué dans les conditions prévues par l'article 51-1 du code pénal, sans que les frais de publication ou d'insertion puissent excéder le maximum de l'amende encourue.>>  

Art. 9. - Il est inséré, après l'article 24 de la loi du 29 juillet 1881 sur la liberté de la presse, un article 24 bis ainsi rédigé:
<<Art. 24 bis. - Seront punis des peines prévues par le sixième alinéa de l'article 24 ceux qui auront contesté, par un des moyens énoncés à l'article 23, l'existence d'un ou plusieurs crimes contre l'humanité tels qu'ils sont définis par l'article 6 du statut du tribunal militaire international annexé à l'accord de Londres du 8 août 1945 et qui ont été commis soit par les membres d'une organisation déclarée criminelle en application de l'article 9 dudit statut, soit par une personne reconnue coupable de tels crimes par une juridiction française ou internationale.
<<Le tribunal pourra en outre ordonner:
<<1o L'affichage de sa décision dans les conditions prévues par l'article 51 du code pénal;
<<2o La publication de celle-ci ou l'insertion d'un communiqué dans les conditions prévues par l'article 51-1 du code pénal, sans que les frais de publication ou d'insertion puissent excéder le maximum de l'amende encourue.>>  

Art. 10. - L'article 32 de la loi du 29 juillet 1881 sur la liberté de la presse est complété par les dispositions suivantes:
<<En cas de condamnation pour l'un des faits prévus par l'alinéa précédent, le tribunal pourra en outre ordonner:
<<1o L'affichage de sa décision dans les conditions prévues par l'article 51 du code pénal;
<<2o La publication de celle-ci on l'insertion d'un communiqué dans les conditions prévues par l'article 51-1 du code pénal, sans que les frais de publication ou d'insertion puissent excéder le maximum de l'amende encourue.>>  

Art. 11. - L'article 33 de la loi du 29 juillet 1881 sur la liberté de la presse est complété par les dispositions suivantes:
<<En cas de condamnation pour l'un des faits prévus par l'alinéa précédent, le tribunal pourra en outre ordonner:
<<1o L'affichage de sa décision dans les conditions prévues par l'article 51 du code pénal;
<<2o La publication de celle-ci ou l'insertion d'un communiqué dans les conditions prévues par l'article 51-1 du code pénal, sans que les frais de publication ou d'insertion puissent excéder le maximum de l'amende encourue.>>  

Art. 12. - Dans le premier alinéa de l'article 48-1 de la loi du 29 juillet 1881 sur la liberté de la presse, après les mots: <<de combattre le racisme>> sont insérés les mots: <<ou d'assister les victimes de discrimination fondée sur leur origine nationale, ethnique, raciale ou religieuse>>.

Art. 13. - Il est inséré, après l'article 48-1 de la loi du 29 juillet 1881 sur la liberté de la presse, un article 48-2 ainsi rédigé:
<<Art. 48-2. - Toute association régulièrement déclarée depuis au moins cinq ans à la date des faits, qui se propose, par ses statuts, de défendre les intérêts moraux et l'honneur de la Résistance ou des déportés peut exercer les droits reconnus à la partie civile en ce qui concerne l'apologie des crimes de guerre, des crimes contre l'humanité ou des crimes ou délits de collaboration avec l'ennemi et en ce qui concerne l'infraction prévue par l'article 24 bis.>>  

TITRE III

DISPOSITIONS DIVERSES

Art. 14. - L'article 6 de la loi no 82-652 du 29 juillet 1982 sur la communication audiovisuelle est complété par un paragraphe II ainsi rédigé:
<<II. - Les associations remplissant les conditions fixées par l'article 48-1 de la loi du 29 juillet 1881 sur la liberté de la presse peuvent également exercer le droit de réponse prévu par le présent article dans le cas où des imputations susceptibles de porter atteinte à l'honneur ou à la réputation d'une personne ou d'un groupe de personnes à raison de leur origine, de leur appartenance ou de leur non-appartenance à une ethnie, une nation, une race ou une religion déterminée auraient été diffusées dans le cadre d'une activité de communication audiovisuelle.
<<Toutefois, quand les imputations concerneront des personnes considérées individuellement, l'association ne pourra exercer le droit de réponse que si elle justifie avoir reçu leur accord.
<<Aucune association ne pourra requérir la diffusion d'une réponse en application du présent article dès lors qu'aura été diffusée une réponse à la demande d'une des associations remplissant les conditions prévues par l'article 48-1 précité.>> 

Art. 15. - I. - Le deuxième alinéa de l'article 8 de la loi no 85-699 du 11 juillet 1985 tendant à la constitution d'archives audiovisuelles de la justice est complété par la phrase suivante:
<<Toutefois, la reproduction ou la diffusion, intégrale ou partielle, de l'enregistrement des audiences d'un procès pour crime contre l'humanité peut être autorisée dès que ce procès a pris fin par une décision devenue définitive.>> II. - Les procès dont l'enregistrement aura été autorisé au jour de la promulgation de la présente loi pourront être reproduits ou diffusés en suivant la procédure prévue par l'article 8 modifié de la loi no 85-699 du 11 juillet 1985 précitée.

La présente loi sera exécutée comme loi de l'Etat.

Fait à Paris, le 13 juillet 1990.

FRANCOIS MITTERRAND

Par le Président de la République:

Le Premier ministre,
MICHEL ROCARD

Le ministre d'Etat, ministre des affaires étrangères,

ROLAND DUMAS

Le garde des sceaux, ministre de la justice,
PIERRE ARPAILLANGE

Le ministre de la défense,

JEAN-PIERRE CHEVENEMENT

Le ministre de l'intérieur,
PIERRE JOXE

Le ministre de la culture, de la communication,

des grands travaux et du Bicentenaire,

JACK LANG

Le ministre délégué auprès du ministre de la culture,
de la communication, des grands travaux
et du Bicentenaire, chargé de la communication,

CATHERINE TASCA

(1) Travaux préparatoires: loi no 90-615.



Assemblée nationale:



Proposition de loi no 43;

Rapport de M. François Asensi, au nom de la commission des lois, no 1296;

Discussion et adoption le 2 mai 1990.



Sénat:



Proposition de loi, adoptée par l'Assemblée nationale, no 278 (1989-1990);

Rapport de M. Charles Lederman, au nom de la commission des lois, no 337 (1989-1990);

Discussion et rejet le 11 juin 1990.



Assemblée nationale:



Proposition de loi, rejetée par le Sénat, no 1433;

Rapport de M. François Asensi, au nom de la commission des lois, no 1488;

Discussion et adoption le 28 juin 1990.



Sénat:



Proposition de loi, adoptée par l'Assemblée nationale en deuxième lecture,

no 451 (1989-1990);

Rapport de M. Charles Lederman, au nom de la commission des lois, no 454 (1989-1990);

Discussion et rejet le 29 juin 1990.



Assemblée nationale:



Rapport de M. François Asensi, au nom de la commission mixte paritaire, no 1571.



Sénat:



Rapport de M. Charles Lederman, au nom de la commission mixte paritaire, no 456 (1989-1990).



Assemblée nationale:



Proposition de loi, rejetée par le Sénat en deuxième lecture, no 1570;

Rapport de M. François Asensi no 1572;

Discussion et adoption le 29 juin 1990.



Sénat:



Proposition de loi, adoptée avec modifications par l'Assemblée nationale en nouvelle lecture, no 458 (1989-1990);

Rapport de M. Charles Lederman, au nom de la commission des lois, no 459 (1989-1990);

Discussion et rejet le 30 juin 1990.



Assemblée nationale:

Proposition de loi, rejetée par le Sénat en nouvelle lecture, no 1574;

Rapport de M. François Asensi, au nom de la commission des lois, no 1575;

Discussion et adoption le 30 juin 1990.