Showing posts with label Fascination. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fascination. Show all posts

Sunday, 16 April 2023

Bloom





Okay. Um... But it's not 
only about flowers, right?
You have the crazy plant-nut guy?

He's funny. Right?

"There's not nearly 
enough of him
to fill a book."
So Orlean "digresses 
in long
passages." 
Blah, blah, blah.
"No narrative unites 
these passages." 
— New York Times 
Book Review.

I can't structure this.
It's that sprawling 
New Yorker-shit.

[Not Listening] Oh, man, 
I'd fuck her up the ass….
Sorry

The Book has No Story.

All right. Make one up.
I mean, nobody in this town
can make up a crazy story like you.
You're The KING of that.

No, I didn't want 
to do that this time.
It's someone else's material.
I have a responsibility 
to Susan...

Anyway, I wanted to 
grow as A Writer.
I wanted to do 
something simple.
Show people 
how amazing
flowers are.

….ARE they amazing?

…I don't know
I think they are….
I need you to get me out of this.


All right. Charlie, you've been stringing them along for months.
Not to give them anything at this
point would be a terrible career move.



“Hey, let's not get off The Subject.
This isn't a pissing contest.

The Point is, what's so wonderful 
is that all these flowers have a 
specific relationship with the 
insect that pollinates it.

There's a certain orchid looks 
exactly like a certain insect.

So the insect is drawn to this flower, 
its double, its soul mate, 
and wants nothing more 
than to make love to it.

After the insect flies off, 
it spots another soul-mate flower 
and makes love to it, pollinating it.

And neither The Flower 
nor The Insect will 
ever understand 
the significance of 
their lovemaking.

How could they know that 
because of their little dance, 
The World lives?

But it does.

By simply doing what they're designed to do 
something large
and magnificent happens.

In this sense, they show us
How to Live.

How the only barometer 
you have is Your Heart.

How when you spot Your Flower,
you can't let anything 
get in your way.





"You would have to want something very badly to go looking for it in the Fakahatchee Strand. The Fakahatchee is a preserve of sixty-three thousand coastal lowland acres in the southwestern corner of Florida, about twenty-five miles south of Naples, in that part of Collier County where satiny lawns and golf courses give way to an ocean of saw grass with edges as sharp as scythes. 

Part of the Fakahatchee is deep swamp, part is cypress stands, part is wet woods, part is estuarine tidal marsh, and part is parched prairie. The limestone underneath it is six million years old and is capped with hard rock and sand, silt and shell marls, and a grayish-greenish clay.

Overall, the Fakahatchee is as flat as a cracker. Ditches and dents fill up fast with oozing groundwater. The woods are dense and lightless. In the open stretches the land unrolls like a smooth grass mat and even small bumps and wrinkles are easy to see. Most of the land is at an elevation of only five or ten feet, and it slopes millimeter by millimeter until it is dead even with the sea. 

The Fakahatchee has a particular strange and exceptional beauty. The grass prairies in sunlight look like yards of raw silk. The tall, straight palm trunks and the tall, straight cypress trunks shoot up out of the flat land like geysers. It is beautiful the way a Persian carpet is beautiful—thick, intricate, lush, almost monotonous in its richness. People live in the Fakahatchee and around it, but it is an unmistakably inhospitable place. In 1872 a surveyor made this entry in his field notes: "A pond, surrounded by bay and cypress swamp, impracticable. Pond full of monstrous alligators. Counted fifty and stopped." 

In fact, the hours I spent in the Fakahatchee retracing Laroche's footsteps were probably the most miserable I have spent in my entire life. The swampy part of the Fakahatchee is hot and wet and buggy and full of cottonmouth snakes and diamondback rattlers and alligators and snapping turtles and poisonous plants and wild hogs and things that stick into you and on you and fly into your nose and eyes. Crossing the swamp is a battle. You can walk through about as easily as you could walk through a car wash. The sinkholes are filled with as much as seven feet of standing water, and around them the air has the slack, drapey weight of wet velvet. Sides of trees look sweaty Leaves are slick from the humidity. The mud sucks your feet and tries to keep a hold of them; if it fails it will settle for your shoes. The water in the swamp is stained black with tannin from the bark of cypress trees that is so corrosive it can cure leather. 

Whatever isn't wet in the Fakahatchee is blasted. The sun pounds the treeless prairies. The grass gets so dry that the friction from a car can set it on fire, and the burning grass can engulf the car in flames. The Fakahatchee used to be littered with burned-up cars that had been abandoned by panfried adventurers—a botanist who traveled through in the 1940s recalled in an interview that he was most impressed by the area's variety of squirrels and the number of charred Model T's. The swamp's stillness and darkness and thickness can rattle your nerves. In 1885 a sailor on a plume-collecting expedition wrote in his diary: "The place looked wild and lonely. About three o'clock it seemed to get on Henry's nerves and we saw him crying, he could not tell us why, he was just plain scared." 

Spooky places are usually full of death, but the Fakahatchee is crazy with living things. Birders used to come from as far away as Cuba and leave with enough plumes to decorate thousands of ladies' hats; in the 1800s one group of birders also took home eight tons of birds' eggs. One turn-of-the-century traveler wrote that on his journey he found the swamp's abundance marvelous—he caught two hundred pounds of lobsters, which he ate for breakfasts, and stumbled across a rookery where he gathered "quite a supply of cormorant and blue heron eggs, with which I intend to make omelets." That night he had a dinner of a fried blue heron and a cabbage-palm heart. 

In the Fakahatchee there used to be a carpet of lubber grasshoppers so deep that it made driving hazardous, and so many orchids that visitors described their heavy sweet smell as nauseating. 

On my first walk in the swamp I saw strap lilies and water willows and sumac and bladderwort, and resurrection ferns springing out of a fallen dead tree; I saw oaks and pines and cypress and pop ash and beauty-berry and elderberry and yellow-eyed grass and camphor weed. When I walked in, an owl gave me a lordly look, and when I walked out three tiny alligators skittered across my path. I wandered into a nook in the swamp that was girdled with tall cypress. 

The rangers call this nook The Cathedral

I closed my eyes and stood in the stillness for a moment hardly breathing, and when I opened my eyes and looked up I saw dozens of bromeliad plants roosting in the branches of almost every tree I could see. The bromeliads were bright red and green and shaped like fright wigs. Some were spider-sized and some were as big as me. The sun shooting through the swamp canopy glanced off their sheeny leaves. Hanging up there on the branches the bromeliads looked not quite like plants. They looked more like a crowd of animals, watching everything that passed their way. 

I had decided to go to the Fakahatchee after the hearing because I wanted to see what Laroche had wanted. I asked him to go with me, but because the judge had banned him from the swamp until the case was over I had to look around for someone else. I suppose I could have gone alone, but I had heard the Fakahatchee was a hard place and even a few brave-seeming botanists I'd talked to told me they didn't like to go in by themselves. At last I was introduced to a park ranger named Tony who said he would go with me. I then spent the next several days talking myself into being unafraid. 

A few days before we were supposed to go, Tony called and asked if I was really sure I wanted to make the trip. I said I was. I'm actually pretty tough. I've run a marathon and traveled by myself to weird places and engaged in conversations with a lot of strangers, and when my toughness runs out I can rely on a certain willful obliviousness to keep me going. 

On the other hand, my single most unfavorite thing in life so far has been to touch the mushy bottom of the lake during swimming lessons at summer camp and feel the weedy slime squeeze between my clenched toes, so the idea of walking through the swamp was a little bit extra-horrible to me. 

The next day Tony called and asked again if I was really ready for the Fakahatchee. At that point I gave up trying to be tough and let every moment in the lake at Camp Cardinal ooze back into my memory, and when I finally met Tony at the ranger station I almost started to cry. 

But I was determined to see orchids, so Tony and I went deep into the Fakahatchee to try to find them. 

We walked from morning until late in the afternoon with little luck. The light was hot and the air was airless. My legs ached and my head ached and I couldn't stand the sticky feel of my own skin. I began having the frantic, furtive thoughts of a deserter and started wondering what Tony would do if I suddenly sat down and refused to keep walking. He was a car-length ahead of me; from what I could tell he felt terrific. I mustered myself and caught up. 

As we marched along Tony told me about his life and mentioned that he was an orchid collector himself and that he had a little home orchid lab, where he was trying to produce a hybrid that would have the wraparound lip of an Encyclia but would be the color of a certain Cattleya that is maroon with small lime-green details. He said that he would find out if he had succeeded in seven or eight years, when the hybrid seedlings would bloom. 

I said nothing for the next mile or so. 

When we stopped to rest and Tony tried to figure out what was wrong with his compass, I asked him what he thought it was about orchids that seduced humans so completely that they were compelled to steal them and worship them and try to breed new and specific kinds of them and then be willing to wait for nearly a decade for one of them to flower. 

"Oh, mystery, beauty, unknowability, I suppose," he said, shrugging. "Besides, I think the real reason is that life has no meaning. 

I mean, no obvious meaning. 
You wake up, you go to work, you do stuff. 

I think everybody's always looking for something a little unusual that can preoccupy them and help pass the time." 

The orchid I really wanted to see was Polyrrhiza lindenii, the ghost orchid. Laroche had taken more of other orchid and bromeliad species when he went poaching, but he told me that the ghost orchids were the ones he had wanted the most. 

Polyrrhiza lindenii is the only really pretty orchid in the Fakahatchee. Technically it is an orchid of the Vandaneae tribe, Sarcanthinae subtribe; Polyrrhiza is its genus (the genus is sometimes also called Polyradicion). The ghost is a leafless species named in honor of the Belgian plantsman Jean-Jules Linden, who first discovered it in Cuba in 1844. It was seen for the first time in the United States in 1880 in Collier County 

The ghost orchid usually grows around the trunks of pop ash and pond apple and custard apple trees. It blooms once a year. It has no foliage—it is nothing but roots, a tangle of flat green roots about the width of linguine, wrapped around a tree. The roots are chlorophyllus; that is, they serve as both roots and leaves. The flower is a lovely papery white. It has the intricate lip that is characteristic of all orchids, but its lip is especially pronounced and pouty, and each corner tapers into a long, fluttery tail. In pictures the flower looks like the face of a man with a Fu Manchu mustache. These tails are so delicate that they tremble in a light breeze. The whiteness of the flower is as startling as a spotlight in the grayness and greenness of a swamp. Because the plant has no foliage and its roots are almost invisible against tree bark, the flower looks magically suspended in midair. People say a ghost orchid in bloom looks like a flying white frog — an ethereal and beautiful flying white frog. 

Carlyle Luer, the author of The Native Orchids of Florida, once wrote of the ghost orchid: "Should one be lucky enough to see a flower, all else will seem eclipsed." Near a large sinkhole Tony pointed out some little green straps on a young tree and said they were ghost orchids that were done blooming for the year. We walked for another hour, and he pointed out more green ghost-orchid roots on more trees. 

The light was flattening out and I was muddy and scratched and scorched. Finally we turned around and walked five thousand miles or so back to Tony's Jeep. It had been a hard day and I hadn't seen what I'd come to see. I kept my mind busy as we walked out by wondering if the hard-to-find, briefly seen, irresistibly beautiful, impossible-to-cultivate ghost orchid was just a fable and not a real flower at all. Maybe it really was a ghost. 

There are certainly ghosts in the Fakahatchee — ghosts of rangers who were murdered years ago by illegal plume hunters, and of loggers who were cut to pieces in fights and then left to cool and crumble into dirt, and for years there has been an apparition wandering the swamp, The Swamp Ape, which is said to be seven feet tall and weigh seven hundred pounds and have the physique of a human, the posture of an ape, the body odor of a skunk, and an appetite for lima beans. 

There is also an anonymous, ghostly human being whom the Fakahatchee rangers call the Ghost Grader, who brings real — not imaginary — construction equipment into the swamp every once in a while and clears off the vine-covered roads. 

If the ghost orchid was really only a phantom it was still such a bewitching one that it could seduce people to pursue it year after year and mile after miserable mile. If it was a real flower I wanted to keep coming back to Florida until I could see one. The reason was not that I love orchids. I don't even especially like orchids. What I wanted was to see this thing that people were drawn to in such a singular and powerful way

Everyone I was meeting connected to the orchid poaching had circled their lives around some great desire — Laroche had his crazy inspirations and orchid lovers had their intense devotion to their flowers and the Seminoles had their burning dedication to their history and culture — a desire that then answered questions for them about how to spend their time and their money and who their friends would be and where they would travel and what they did when they got there. It was religion. I wanted to want something as much as people wanted these plants, but it isn't part of my constitution. I think people my age are embarrassed by too much enthusiasm and believe that too much passion about anything is naive. 

I suppose I do have one un-embarrassing passion — I want to know what it feels like to care about something passionately

That night I called Laroche and told him that I had just come back from looking for ghost orchids in the Fakahatchee but that I had seen nothing but bare roots. 

I said that I was wondering whether I had missed this year's flowers or whether perhaps the only place the ghost orchid bloomed was in the imagination of people who'd walked too long in the swamp. 

What I didn't say was that strong feelings always make me skeptical at first. What else I didn't say was that his life seemed to be filled with things that were just like the ghost orchid — wonderful to imagine and easy to fall in love with but a little fantastic and fleeting and out of reach. 

I could hear a soft puckery gulp as he inhaled cigarette smoke. Then he said, "Jesus Christ, of course there are ghost orchids out there! I've stolen them, for Chrissake! I know exactly where they are." The phone was silent for a moment, and then he cleared his throat and said, "You should have gone with me." 

Orchid Fever 

The Orchidaceae is a large, ancient family of perennial plants with one fertile stamen and a three-petaled flower. One petal is unlike the other two. In most orchid species this petal is enlarged into a pouch or lip and is the most conspicuous part of the flower. There are more than sixty thousand known orchid species, and there may be thousands more that haven't yet been discovered and maybe thousands that once lived on earth and are now extinct. 

Humans have created another hundred thousand hybrids by cross-fertilizing one species with another or by crossing different hybrids to one another in plant-breeding labs. 

Orchids are considered the most highly evolved flowering plants on earth.

Tuesday, 27 September 2022

Adopt, Adapt and Improve

 





Orchid hunting is a mortal occupation. 

Victorian-era orchid hunter William Arnold drowned on a collecting expedition. 

Osmers vanished without a trace in Asia. 

Augustus Margary survived toothache, rheumatism, pleurisy and dysentery
only to be murdered when he completed his mission and traveled beyond Bhamo. 

Laroche loved orchids, but I... 
I came to believe he loved the difficulty and fatality of getting them almost as much as he loved the orchids themselves. 

John Laoche, Orchid Hunter :
I've been a professional horticulturist for like 12 years. 
Uh, I owned my own plant nursery
which was destroyed by the hurricane. 
I'm a professional plant lecturer
I've given over, like, 60 lectures 
on the cultivation of plants. 
I'm a published author
both in magazine 
and book form. 
And I have extensive experience with orchids 
and the asexual micropropagation of orchids 
under aseptic cultures. 

That's laboratory work. 
It's not at all like your 
nursery work. 
Um... 
I'm probably the smartest person I know.

Friday, 23 September 2022

Fascinating.



Susan Orlean :
Hi. I'm looking for John Laroche. 


Matthew Osceola :
Hi. 

Susan Orlean :
Hi. I'm writing an article 
on John, and I stopped by. 
Hoped I could see him. 


Matthew Osceola :
John's not here. 

Susan Orlean :
Oh. Well, you were at The Swamp 
with him, weren't you? 
Saw you at the courthouse, 
that's how I know. 

Matthew Osceola :
I'm Matthew Osceola. 

Susan Orlean :
Susan Orlean. Nice to meet you. 
Maybe I could talk to 
you for a second. 
I'm just trying to get a feel 
for the whole operation... 


Matthew Osceola :
You have very beautiful hair. 

Susan Orlean :
…Thank you very much. 
Thank you. I just... 
I just washed it this morning. 
I just used a new conditioner. 


Matthew Osceola :
I can see Your Sadness
It's lovely

Susan Orlean :
....Well, I'm just tired, that's all. 
That's my problem. 
So maybe we could chat a little bit, 
and I could get some background...


Matthew Osceola :
I'm not going to 
talk to you much. 
It's not personal. 
It's The Indian way. 

John Laroche :
Angraecum sesquipedale. Beauty! 
God! Darwin wrote about this one. 
Charles Darwin? 
Evolution guy? Hello
You see that nectary down there? 
Darwin hypothesized a moth 
with a nose 12 inches long 
to pollinate it. 
Everyone thought he was a loon. 

Then, sure enough, they found 
this moth with a 12-inch proboscis. 
"Proboscis" means nose, by the way. 

I know what it means. 

Hey, let's not get off the subject. 
This isn't a pissing contest
The Point is, what's so wonderful is that 
all these flowers have a specific relationship 
with the insect that pollinates it. 

There's a certain orchid looks exactly like a certain insect. 
So The Insect is drawn to This Flower, its double
its soul mate, and wants nothing more 
than to make love to it. 

After The Insect flies off, 
it spots another 
soul-mate flower 
and makes love to it, 
pollinating it. 

And neither The Flower 
nor The Insect 
will ever understand the significance of their lovemaking. 
How could they know that because of 
their little dance, The World lives
But it does. By simply doing 
what they're designed to do 
something large 
and magnificent happens. 

In this sense, They show Us 
How to Live. 
How the only barometer 
you have is Your Heart. 
How when You spot 
Your Flower
You can't let anything 
get in Your Way. 



He's really quite a character. 
No front teeth. 
Doesn't seem to bother him at all. 

Why doesn't he get them fixed? 
It seems almost Sociopathic 
to make everybody look at that. 

Yeah, but he gives a great blowjob, honey. 
He is a fascinating character, though. 
Sounds like a gold mine, Sue. 

Susan Orlean :
It could be. I don't know, you know? 
He's, uh... 

He lives with his dad, he's obsessed 
with his dead mother, and... 

He wears his sunglasses on a little 
dingle-dangle around his neck. 

Loving it. Tell them about the van. 

Okay, the van. The van. 

Susan Orlean :
I can't tell about the van. I gotta pee. 

No, tell us about the van. 

It's amazing. It's... 

What's in it? 

You did it in the van. 

Susan Orlean :
Shut up. David, you tell... 
Don't you tell them. Don't tell them. 

Okay, the van. David! 
This van was filled with junk... 

Susan Orlean :
Shut up! 

Potting soil. Shovels. 
Food wrappers. Fertilizer. 
Susie said she hoped it was fertilizer, anyway. 
Said she couldn't be sure. 

Laroche had a certain aromatic look about him. And she said...
She said perhaps his obsessiveness 
didn't leave room in his schedule 
for personal hygiene. 


Maybe the orchids got all the available water. 

Susan Orlean :
I wanted to want something 
as much as people wanted these plants
But... it isn't part of my constitution. 
I suppose I do have one unembarrassed passion. 
I wanna know what it feels like 
to care about something passionately. 

"Should one be lucky enough to see a ghost orchid, all else will seem eclipsed." 
If the ghost orchid was really a phantom, 
it was such a bewitching one 
that it could seduce people to pursue it 
year after year and mile after miserable mile. 

If it was a real flower, I wanted to see one. 
The reason wasn't that I love orchids. 
I don't even especially like orchids. 
What I wanted was to see this thing 
that people were drawn to in such 
a singular and powerful way. 

Susan Orlean :
So how many turtles did you end up collecting? 

John Laroche :
Oh, I lost interest right after that. 

Susan Orlean :
Oh. 

John Laroche :
I dropped turtles when I fell in love with Ice Age fossils. Collected the shit out of them. 

Fossils were the only thing 
that made sense to me 
in this fucked-up world. 

I ditched fossils for resilvering old mirrors. 
My Mom and I had the largest collection of 19th-century Dutch mirrors on the planet. 
Perhaps you read about us. 
Mirror World, October '88? 
I got a copy here somewhere. 

Susan Orlean :
I guess I'd just like to know 
how you can detach from something that 
you've invested so much of your soul in. 

I mean, didn't you ever miss turtles? 
The only thing that made 
your 10-year-old life 
worth living? 

John Laroche :
Look, I'll tell you A Story, all right? 
I once fell deeply, you know, 
profoundly in love with tropical fish. 
I had 60 goddamn fish tanks in my house. 

I'd skin-dive to find 
just the right ones. 
Anisotremus virginicus, Holacanthus ciliaris, 
Chaetodon capistratus. 
You name it. 

Then one day I say, "Fuck fish.
I renounce fish. 
I vow never to set foot 
in that ocean again.
That's how much "Fuck fish." 
That was 17 years ago, and I have 
never since stuck a toe in that ocean. 
And I love the ocean. 

Susan Orlean :
But.... why

John Laroche :
Done with fish. 

Susan Orlean :
If you'd really loved something
wouldn't a little bit of it linger
Evidently Laroche's finishes 
were downright and absolute. 
He just moved on. 

I sometimes wished 
I could do the same.

Monday, 25 October 2021

Johnny-5










GOD is Love,” says St. John. 


When I first tried to write this book I thought that his maxim would provide me with a very plain highroad through the whole subject. I thought I should be able to say that Human Loves deserved to be called Loves at all just in so far as they resembled that Love which is God. The first distinction I made was therefore between what I called Gift-love and Need-Love. The typical example of Gift-Love would be that love which moves A Man to Work and Plan and Save for The Future well-being of His Family which he will die without sharing or seeing; of the second, that which sends a lonely or frightened Child to its Mother’s Arms.

There was no doubt which was more like Love Himself. Divine Love is Gift-love. The Father gives all He is and has to the Son. The Son gives Himself back to the Father, and gives Himself to the world, and for the world to the Father, and thus gives the world (in Himself) back to the Father too.

And what, on the other hand, can be less like anything we believe of God’s life than Need-Love? He lacks nothing, but our Need-Love, as Plato saw, is “the son of Poverty.” It is the accurate reflection in consciousness of our actual nature. We are born helpless. As soon as we are fully conscious we discover loneliness. We need others physically, emotionally, intellectually; we need them if we are to know anything, even ourselves.


I was looking forward to writing some fairly easy panegyrics on the first sort of love and disparagements of the second. And much of what I was going to say still seems to me to be true. I still think that if all we mean by our love is a craving to be loved, we are in a very deplorable state. But I would not now say (with my master, MacDonald) that if we mean only this craving we are mistaking for love something that is not love at all. I cannot now deny the name love to Need-love. Every time I have tried to think the thing out along those lines I have ended in puzzles and contradictions. The reality is more complicated than I supposed.

First of all, we do violence to most languages, including our own, if we do not call Need-love “love.” Of course language is not an infallible guide, but it contains, with all its defects, a good deal of stored insight and experience. If you begin by flouting it, it has a way of avenging itself later on. We had better not follow Humpty Dumpty in making words mean whatever we please.

Secondly, we must be cautious about calling Need-love “mere selfishness.” Mere is always a dangerous word. No doubt Need-love, like all our impulses, can be selfishly indulged. A tyrannous and gluttonous demand for affection can be a horrible thing. But in ordinary life no one calls a child selfish because it turns for comfort to its mother; nor an adult who turns to his fellow “for company.” Those, whether children or adults, who do so least are not usually the most selfless. Where Need-love is felt there may be reasons for denying or totally mortifying it; but not to feel it is in general the mark of the cold egoist. Since we do in reality need one another (“it is not good for man to be alone”), then the failure of this need to appear as Need-love in .consciousness—in other words, the illusory feeling that it is good for us to be alone—is a bad spiritual symptom; just as lack of appetite is a bad medical symptom because men do really need food.

But thirdly, we come to something far more important. Every Christian would agree that a man’s spiritual health is exactly proportional to his love for God. But Man’s Love for God, from the very nature of the case, must always be very largely, and must often be entirely, a Need-love. 

This is obvious when we implore Forgiveness for our sins or Support in our tribulations. But in the long run it is perhaps even more apparent in our growing — for it ought to be growing — awareness that our whole being by its very nature is one vast need; incomplete, preparatory, empty yet cluttered, crying out for Him who can untie things that are now knotted together and tie up things that are still dangling loose. 


I do not say that Man can never bring to God anything at all but sheer Need-love. Exalted Souls may tell us of a reach beyond that. But they would also, I think, be the first to tell us that those heights would cease to be true Graces, would become Neo-Platonic or finally Diabolical Illusions, the moment a man dared to think that he could live on them and henceforth drop out the element of need

“The Highest,” says the Imitation, “Does Not Stand without The Lowest.” It would be a bold and silly creature that came before its Creator with the boast “I’m no beggar. I love you disinterestedly.” 

Those who come nearest to a Gift-Love for God will next moment, even at the very same moment, be beating their breasts with The Publican and laying their indigence before the only real Giver. And God will have it so. 


He addresses our Need-love: “Come unto me all ye that travail and are heavy-laden,” or, in the Old Testament, “Open your mouth wide and I will fill it.”

Thus one Need-Love, The Greatest of All, either coincides with or at least makes a main ingredient in Man’s Highest, Healthiest, and Most Realistic Spiritual Condition. 


A very strange corollary follows. 


Man approaches God most nearly when he is in one sense least Like God. For what can be more unlike than fullness and need, sovereignty and humility, righteousness and penitence, limitless power and a cry for help?

This paradox staggered me when I first ran into it; it also wrecked all my previous attempts to write about love. When we face it, something like this seems to result.

We must distinguish two things which might both possibly be called “nearness to God.One is likeness to God. God has impressed some sort of likeness to Himself, I suppose, in all that He has made. Space and time, in their own fashion, mirror His greatness; all life, His fecundity; animal life, His activity. Man has a more important likeness than these by being rational. Angels, we believe, have likenesses which Man lacks: immortality and intuitive knowledge. In that way all men, whether good or bad, all angels including those that fell, are more like God than the animals are. Their natures are in this sense “nearer” to the Divine Nature. 

But, secondly, there is what we may call nearness of approach. If this is what we mean, the states in which a man is “nearest” to God are those in which he is most surely and swiftly approaching his final union with God, vision of God and enjoyment of God. And as soon as we distinguish nearness-by-likeness and nearness-of-approach, we see that they do not necessarily coincide. They may or may not.

Perhaps an analogy may help. Let us suppose that we are doing a mountain walk to the village which is our home. At mid-day we come to the top of a cliff where we are, in space, very near it because it is just below us. We could drop a stone into it. But as we are no cragsmen we can’t get down. We must go a long way round; five miles, maybe. At many points during that detour we shall, statically, be farther from the village than we were when we sat above the cliff. But only statically. In terms of progress we shall be far “nearer” our baths and teas.

Since God is blessed, omnipotent, sovereign and creative, there is obviously a sense in which happiness, strength, freedom and fertility (whether of mind 01 body), wherever they appear in human life, constitute likenesses, and in that way proximities, to God. But no one supposes that the possession of these gifts has any necessary connection with our sanctification. No kind of riches is a passport to the Kingdom of Heaven.

At the cliff’s top we are near the village, but however long we sit there we shall never be any nearer to our bath and our tea. So here; the likeness, and in that sense nearness, to Himself which God has conferred upon certain creatures and certain states of those creatures is something finished, built in. Wha1 is near Him by likeness is never, by that fact alone, going to be any nearer. But nearness of approach is. by definition, increasing nearness. And whereas the likeness is given to us—and can be received with or without thanks, can be used or abused—the approach, however initiated and supported by Grace, is something we must do. Creatures are made in their varying ways images of God without their own collaboration or even consent. It is not so that they become sons of God. And the likeness they receive by sonship is not that of images or portraits. It is in one way more than likeness, for it is union or unity with God in will; but this is consistent with all the differences we have been considering. Hence, as a better writer has said, our imitation of God in this life—that is, our willed imitation as distinct from any of the likenesses which He has impressed upon our natures or states—must be an imitation of God incarnate: our model is the Jesus, not only of Calvary, but of the workshop, the roads, the crowds, the clamorous demands and surly oppositions, the lack of all peace and privacy, the interruptions. For this, so strangely unlike anything we can attribute to the Divine life in itself, is apparently not only like, but is, the Divine life operating under human conditions.

I must now explain why I have found this distinction necessary to any treatment of our loves. St. John’s saying that God is love has long been balanced in my mind against the remark of a modern author (M. Denis de Rougemont) that “love ceases to be a demon only when he ceases to be a god”; which of course can be re-statead in the form "begins to be a demon the moment he begins to be a god.” This balance seems to me an indispensable safeguard. If we ignore it the truth that God is love may slyly come to mean for us the converse, that love is God.

I suppose that everyone who has thought about the matter will see what M. de Rougemont meant. Every human love, at its height, has a tendency to claim for itself a divine authority. Its voice tends to sound as if it were the will of God Himself. It tells us not to count the cost, it demands of us a total commitment, it attempts to over-ride all other claims and insinuates that any action which is sincerely done “for love’s sake” is thereby lawful and even meritorious. That erotic love and love of one’s country may thus attempt to “become gods” is generally recognised. But family affection may do the same. So, in a different way, may friendship. I shall not here elaborate the point, for it will meet us again and again in later chapters.

Now it must be noticed that the natural loves make this blasphemous claim not when they are in their worst, but when they are in their best, natural condition; when they are what our grandfathers called “pure” or “noble.” This is especially obvious in the erotic sphere. A faithful and genuinely self-sacrificing passion will speak to us with what seems the voice of God. Merely animal or frivolous lust will not. It will corrupt its addict in a dozen ways, but not in that way; a man may act upon such feelings but he cannot revere them any more than a man who scratches reveres the itch. A silly woman’s temporary indulgence, which is really self-indulgence, to a spoiled child—her living doll while the fit lasts—is much less likely to “become a god” than the deep, narrow devotion of a woman who (quite really) “lives for her son.” And I am inclined to think that the sort of love for a man’s country which is worked up by beer and brass bands will not lead him to do much harm (or much good) for her sake. It will probably be fully discharged by ordering another drink and joining in the chorus.

And this of course is what we ought to expect. Our loves do not make their claim to divinity until the claim becomes plausible. It does not become plausible until there is in them a real resemblance to God, to Love Himself. Let us here make no mistake. Our Gift-loves are really God-like; and among our Gift-loves those are most God-like which are most boundless and unwearied in giving. All the things the poets say about them are true. Their joy, their energy, their patience, their readiness to forgive, their desire for the good of the beloved—all this is a real and all but adorable image of the Divine life. In its presence we are right to thank God “who has given such power to men.” We may say, quite truly and in an intelligible sense, that those who love greatly are “near” to God. But of course it is “nearness by likeness.” It will not of itself produce “nearness of approach.” The likeness has been given us. It has no necessary connection with that slow and painful approach which must be our own (though by no means our unaided) task. Meanwhile, however, the likeness is a splendour. That is why we may mistake Like for Same. We may give our human loves the unconditional allegiance which we owe only to God. Then they become gods: then they become demons. Then they will destroy us, and also destroy themselves. For natural loves that are allowed to become gods do not remain loves. They are still called so, but can become in fact complicated forms of hatred.

Our Need-loves may be greedy and exacting but they do not set up to be gods. They are not near enough (by likeness) to God to attempt that.

It follows from what has been said that we must join neither the idolaters nor the “debunkers” of human love. Idolatry both of erotic love and of “the domestic affections” was the great error of nineteenth-century literature. Browning, Kingsley, and Patmore sometimes talk as if they thought that falling in love was the same thing as sanctification; the novelists habitually oppose to “the World” not the Kingdom of Heaven but the home. We live in the reaction against this. The debunkers stigmatise as slush and sentimentality a very great deal of what their fathers said in praise of love. They are always pulling up and exposing the grubby roots of our natural loves. But I take it we must listen neither “to the over-wise nor to the over-foolish giant.” The highest does not stand without the lowest. A plant must have roots below as well as sunlight above and roots must be grubby. Much of the grubbiness is clean dirt if only you will leave it in the garden and not keep on sprinkling it over the library table. The human loves can be glorious images of Divine love. No less than that: but also no more—proximities of likeness which in one instance may help, and in another may hinder, proximity of approach. Sometimes perhaps they have not very much to do with it either way.


Friday, 22 October 2021

Shiny



Maurice Hurley :
“I get a call from Paramount saying 
Come and meet Roddenberry, 
we want to consider you as a writer 
for Star Trek: The Next Generation’ 
I said that's A Joke, that's a JOKE. 

But I want to meet Roddenberry. 
Who wouldn't wanna meet Roddenberry? 

I was coming off two cop shows. 
I was coming off Miami Vice, very good show. 
Equalizer, very good show. 

So he gives me the first episode to rewrite. 
We pass each other in the hallway four or five times a day, 
he won't look at me.

Dorothy Fortuna
Apparently Gene didn't like 
What He Wrote. 
It was probably the first time 
we heard them battle.

Hurley :
And he raises up behind his desk, 
this great bird-like creature 
and he points his finger at me like this 
and he says, 
"YOU don't know the difference 
between SHIELDS 
and DEFLECTORS!." 

And that went on for weeks.”

Shatner :
What did that say to you about 
What You Were Confronting? 

Hurley :
He didn't want ME,  
Hurley, The Writer. 

He didn't want me to write Me
he wanted me 
to write HIM…








You cannot have 
A Protagonist 
without Desire.

It doesn't make any sense.
Any fucking sense.

You follow? Good.
Anyone else?

Yes?

Kuafman :
What if A Writer is attempting to create 
Story where nothing much happens?

Where people don't change,
they don't have any epiphanies.

They Struggle and are Frustrated,
and nothing is resolved.

More a reflection
of The Real World.


Lektor :
The REAL World?

Kaufman
Yes, sir.

Lektor :
The Real fucking World.

First of all, you write a screenplay
without Conflict or Crisis,
you'll bore your audience to tears.

Secondly, Nothing Happens
in The World?

Are you out of your fucking mind?

People are murdered every day.

There's Genocide, War, Corruption.

Every fucking day,
somewhere in the world,
somebody sacrifices his life
to save somebody.

Every day, someone somewhere
takes a conscious decision
to destroy someone else.

People find love.
People lose it.

A Child watches A Mother beaten
to death on the steps of a church.

Someone goes Hungry.
Somebody Else Betrays His Best Friend 
for a Woman.

If you can't find that stuff in life,
then you, My Friend,
don't know crap about Life!

And why the fuck are you wasting my two precious hours with your movie?

I don't have any use for it!

I don't have any bloody use for it!

Okay, thanks.

Thank you. You're welcome.

No. Thank you.

Thank you so much, Mr. McKee.

This course makes you look at
writing in a whole different way.

Mr. McKee. 

Yes?

I'm the guy you yelled at this morning.

….I need more.

I'm the one who thought
things didn't happen in life.

Ah. Right. Okay.

Nice to see you. 

I need to Talk.

Mr. McKee, my even standing here is very scary.
I don't meet people well.
But what you said this morning
shook me to the bone.

It was bigger than my screenwriting choices.

It was about my choices as 
A Human Being. Please.

Yeah.

Well, you know, I could
sure use a drink, My Friend.

"...but a little fantastic
and fleeting and out of reach."

Then what happens?

Well, that's the end of the book.
I wanted to present it simply without big character arcs or sensationalizing the story.

I wanted to show flowers as God's miracles.

I wanted to show that Orlean never
saw the blooming ghost orchid.

It was about disappointment.

I see. That's not A Movie.

You gotta go back,
put in The Drama.

I can't go back. I've got pages of
false starts and wrong approaches.

I'm way past my deadline.
I'll tell you a secret.

A last act makes a film.

Wow them in the end,
and you got a hit.

You can have flaws, problems,
but wow them in the end
and you've got a hit.

Find an ending. But don't cheat.

And don't you dare bring in
a deus ex machina.

Your characters must change and The Change 
must come from them.

Do that and you'll be fine.

You promise?

Mr. McKee.

Have you taken my course before?


My Brother did.

My Twin brother, Donald.
He's the one who got me to come.

Lektor :
Twin screenwriters? 

Yeah.

Lektor :
Well, Julius and Philip Epstein,
who wrote Casablanca,
they were twins

You mentioned that in class.


Lektor :
Finest screenplay ever written.



Great writers' residence.

Donald.
Hey, how's your trip going?

You getting it on with that
lady journalist, you dog, you?

Yeah.

Listen, I'm just calling to say
congratulations on your script.

Isn't that cool? Marty says he can
get me high-sixes against a mil-five.

That's great, Donald.

I want to thank you
for all your help.

I wasn't any help.

Come on,
you let me stay in your place.

And your integrity
inspired me to even try.

It's been a wild ride.

Catherine says
she wants to play Cassie.

Oh, please! Ha, ha, ha.

Please, Donald?

Catherine Keener?

Catherine Keener's in my house?
Yeah, we're playing Boggle.

She's great. You should really
hang out with her, Charles.

Yeah. Um, look...

I've been thinking.

Maybe you'd be interested in hanging
out for a few days in New York.

Oh, my God, yes.

Yeah?

I was gonna show my script
to some people,

and, well, maybe you could
read it too, you know, if you like.

Of course. I'd be flattered.

Okay.

Thanks, Charles.

Okay, bye.

So, like, what would you do?

The script kind of
makes fun of me, huh?

I'm sorry. I was trying something...
Hey, I don't mind. It's funny.

Good. Okay.

So, what would you do?

You and me are so different,
Charles. We're different talents.

Charlie Kaufman :
I know. Just for fun...
How would the great Donald
end this script?

Heh, heh. Shut up.
"The Great Donald."
I feel like you're missing something.

All right. Like what? 


LookI did a little research
on the airplane.

"Sometimes this kind of story
turns out to be something more, some glimpse of life that expands
like those Japanese paper balls you drop in water and they bloom into flowers and the flower is so marvelous you can't believe there was a time all you saw was a paper ball and a glass of water."

First of all, that's inconsistent.
She said she didn't care about flowers.

For God's sake, it's just a metaphor.

No, it’s NOT, it’s a Similie.

Well, but for what?
What turned that paper ball into a flower?
It's not in the book, Charles.

I don't know. You're reaching.


Maybe.
But I think you actually need to
speak to this woman
To know her.

Charlie Kaufman :
I can't. Really. 

I'll go. I'll pretend I'm you.
I want to do it, Charles.

We'll get to the bottom of this.
We're gonna fix your movie, bro.

Charlie Kaufman :
But you've gotta be exactly me.
I have a reputation to maintain.

You can't be a goofball.
Can't be an asshole.

The Donald :
I'm not an asshole.

Charlie Kaufman :
You know what I mean.
No flirting. No bad jokes.
Don't laugh How You Laugh.

The Donald :
I'm not gonna laugh.
I get to have people think I'm you.
It's an honor.


******
The Donald :
So I guess I'll bring out
the big guns now.

Do you keep in touch with Larouche?
I felt I detected an attraction to him
in the subtext. 
Care to comment?

Uh...

Well, our relationship was strictly reporter-subject.

I mean, certainly an intimacy does
evolve in this kind of relationship.

By definition, I was so interested in everything he had to say.

But the relationship ends
when the book ends.

Mendacious deceit


What?

Nothing.

I just have one more question.
If you could have dinner with one
historical personage, living or dead, who would it be?

Uh, well, I would have to say...
Einstein.
Or Jesus.

Very good.
Interesting Answer.

The Donald :
She's lying. 

Charlie Kaufman :
What do you mean?
What happened?

Nothing. She said everything right.
Too right.

Well, maybe because they're True.
Did you embarrass me?

People who answer questions
Too Right are liars.

Everybody says Jesus and Einstein.
That's a prepackaged answer.

"Jesus and Einstein"?
Listen, Charles, I have an idea.
You'll need to buy me
a pair of binoculars.

What's "Jesus and Einstein"?

Come on.

Sing with me.

What the hell do you need binoculars for?

Let's go, let's go.

She hung up the phone.
She's upset.

Stop watching her.
Leave her alone.

She's crying.
She's at her computer.

This is morally reprehensible.

United to Miami.
Eleven fifty-five a.m. Tomorrow.
Thought she was done with Larouche.

Her parents live in Florida.

That was no parent phone call,
my friend.

Don't say "My Friend."

A guy entering.

Handsome.

Must be her husband.

She's acting weird with him, though, right?

Don't you think?

What's she hiding from him?

Maybe she's a lesbian
and doesn't know how to tell him.

What do you think?

Have you checked out Laroche's porn site?

No. I'm trying to read.

Anyway, I'm gonna look at the porn site. Research.

Don't tell my old lady.

You mean Mom?

No, I don't mean Mom.

Still say we should go
to Miami tomorrow.

Forget it.

Some of these chicks look okay.

Hey, guess what.
We're going to Miami tomorrow.

I said, no.
I said, oh, yeah, baby. Come here.

What I came to understand
is that Change is not A Choice.

Not for a species of plant,
and not for me.

It happens, and you are different.

Maybe the only distinction
between the plant and me
is that afterward,
I lied about my change.

I lied in my book.
I pretended with my husband

that everything was the same.

But something happened
in The Swamp that day.

Hey, look —
I told you I'd find
the jewel of the Fakahatchee.

It's A Fower.
Just A Flower.

Well, might as well grab it.
Long as I'm here.

Oh, man.
Boy, my porn site's gonna be big.

Look, something I didn't tell you that 
I want to tell you about The Ghost. Okay?

I think it might help you.

I'd just started at the nursery.
And I went back one night
to pick up something.

They wanted The Ghost
just to extract the drug.

It had been a ceremonial thing,
but the young guys, you know,
they liked to get stoned.

So Matthew?

He was one of the guys who...?
Sure.

Matthew lived on that shit 
till they ran out.

Because there was this one day
he was fascinated by me.

By my hair and my sadness.

Yeah, well, it does that.
That's what I wanted to tell you.

I mean, I think you'd like it, Susie.
It seems to help people 
be fascinated.

I can extract it for you.
I know how. I watched.

I'm probably 
the only white guy who knows.
I want to do this, Susie.

I'm done with orchids, Larouche.

Hello?

Hi.

It's John.

Did you get my package?

John?

John!

Johnny.

Hey, John? Yeah?

Very happy now.

Well, I'm glad.

Very happy.

Um, John? Hm?

Will you go like this...?

No. Keep going.

No. No.

I'm trying to make a dial tone.
And you have to sustain.

And then I will join you, and together...

See, I can't do it by myself.
Which one do you want me to do?

Yes. Yes. Yes. Okay. Here we go.

That's it. We got it.

We got it. That's fucking amazing.

The Writer, Susan Orlean :
Do you ever get lonely 
sometimes, Johnny?

John Larouche, 
The Orchid Thief :
Well, I was a weird kid.
Nobody liked me.
But I had this idea...
If I waited long enough, someone 
would come around and just,
you know, understand me.

Like my mom.

Except Someone Else.

She'd look at me and
quietly say, "Yes."
Just like that.
And I wouldn't be 
alone anymore.

The Writer, Susan Orlean :
Oh, I wish I were an ant.
Oh, they're so shiny.

John Larouche, 
The Orchid Thief :
You're shinier than 
any ant, darling.

The Writer, Susan Orlean :
That's the sweetest thing
anybody has ever said to me.

John Larouche, 
The Orchid Thief :
Well,
I like you, that's why.