Philip Zelikow - Sorry, no, that's meant to be Robert Macnamarra
"Strauss believed it was for politicians to assert powerful and inspiring myths that everyone could believe in.
They might not be true - but they were necessary illusions.
One of these was religion; the other was the myth of the nation."
Ernest May
May 2000: Future Authors of 9/11 Report Produce John F. Kennedy Book Riddled with Errors
An eminent historian finds serious flaws in a historical treatise about former President John F. Kennedy. The book, The Kennedy Tapes: Inside the White House During the Cuban Missile Crisis, was written in 1997 by conservative historians Ernest May and Philip D. Zelikow, and purports to be an unprecedentedly accurate representation of the events of 1962’s Cuban Missile Crisis based on transcriptions of recorded meetings, conferences, telephone conversations, and interviews with various participants.
[ATLANTIC MONTHLY, 5/2000]
Zelikow is a former member of George H. W. Bush’s National Security Council and a close adviser to future National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice.
[US DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 8/5/2005]
May is a Harvard professor. Both will participate heavily in the creation of the 2004 report by the 9/11 Commission.
[SHENON, 2008, PP. 387-393]
Almost three years after the Kennedy book’s publication, Sheldon M. Stern, the historian for the John F. Kennedy Library from 1977 through 1999, pores over it and the May/Zelikow transcripts.
In the original edition, May and Zelikow admitted that their final product was not perfect: “The reader has here the best text we can produce, but it is certainly not perfect. We hope that some, perhaps many, will go to the original tapes. If they find an error or make out something we could not, we will enter the corrections in subsequent editions or printings of this volume.”
But when Stern checks the book against the tapes, he finds hundreds of errors in the book, some quite significant. Stern concludes that the errors “significantly undermine [the book’s] reliability for historians, teachers, and general readers.” May and Zelikow have corrected a few of the errors in subsequent editions, but have not publicly acknowledged any errors.
Stern concludes, “Readers deserve to know that even now The Kennedy Tapes cannot be relied on as an accurate historical document.”
[ATLANTIC MONTHLY, 5/2000]
One error has then-Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy talking about the planned “invasion” of Russian ships heading to Cuba, when the tapes actually show Kennedy discussing a far less confrontational “examination” of those vessels.
May and Zelikow imply that the Kennedy administration was discussing just the kind of confrontation that it was actually trying to avoid. Another error has CIA Director John McCone referring to the need to call on former President Dwight D. Eisenhower as a “facilitator,” where McCone actually said “soldier.”
May and Zelikow will be rather dismissive of Stern’s findings, saying that “none of these amendments are very important.”
Stern will express shock over their response, and respond, “When the words are wrong, as they are repeatedly, the historical record is wrong.”
[SHENON, 2008, PP. 42]
No comments:
Post a Comment