Maudsley

"A rich source of wrong beliefs is the prolific activity of imagination....by filling up voids of knowledge with fictions and theories, its quick and easy working is a striking contrast with the slow and toilsome work of observation and reasoning. Being the productive force in mind, it has, like the productive forces in nature, three marked qualities: it is prolific, it is pleasant, it is prophetic." 

Henry Maudsley (1886) 

Natural Causes and Supernatural Seemings.

" Paranoid schizophrenic Tennyson Obih who was sectioned twice before being released into care in the community went "off the radar" of the health services and murdered a policeman in broad daylight. "

Primarily because the British Oligarchy, centred around patronage of and by the monarchy cares far more about the welfare of animals than it does about human life - the First and Second Opium Wars respectively killed in excess of 70,000 Chinese directly, and only 69 East India Company Troops, with deaths over the next century caused by the collapse of Chinese Society due to Opium Stupor ranging anywhere between Two and Six Million souls;

But the Chinese clearly deserved it because they're unkind to Pandas, so that's all just fine.  

It's all about the Yellow Peril - Gog and Magog Old Boy, don't cha know?

The is the basis for Eugenic Psychiatric techniques as developed by the Tavistock Institute at the Maudsley and St. Thomas' Hospitals.

I only just figured this out last week : do you know why it is that it always seems, demographically, there appear to be a vastly disproportionate number of male, Afro-Caribbean paranoid schizophrenics out is society?

It's simply because the Maudsley is geographically positioned right between Brixton and Peckham - and that's where they make them. 

This is also why there is no single theoretical model for schizophrenic causation - there is a Seratonin model, and a Dopamine model, both with good statistical "evidence" validating both explanations.

The two are mutually exclusive - it can EITHER be dopamine or seatonin, it can't be both; the two ideas are mutually exclusive, and indeed that's exactly what the data - employing two different methodologies and theoretical assumptions, as well as two different experimental populations - that's exactly what the data in both studies, and both schools of thought SAYS.... 

And no-one seeks to resolve this major conflict in the science - the assumptions HAVE be faulty, and someone therefore must be wrong.

But they just agree to disagree in their little private clique, and the public remains oblivious.