Tuesday, 26 January 2021

THE AEON OF ISIS






The Egyptians and Phoenicians had such a close and warm relationship that the venerable Isis and Osiris legend of Egypt included a trip by their Queen to Byblos in Lebanon to seek help in time of need. It began when her husband -- the god Osiris, who was also the king -- was killed by his brother Seth. The body of Osiris was sealed in a chest and thrown into the Nile River. The rest of the story is told to us by Plutarch, the Greek biographer.

" Isis on [hearing] the news, sheared off one of her tresses, and put on a mourning robe, whence the city, even to the present day has the name of “Copto” (I beat the breast). . . . She learnt by inquiry that the chest had been washed up by the sea at a place called Byblus [Byblos], and that the surf had gently laid it under an Erica [Accacia] tree. This Erica, a most lovely plant, growing up very large in a very short time had enfolded, embraced and concealed the coffer within itself. The King of the place being astonished at the size of the plant, and having cut away the clump that concealed the coffer from sight, set the latter up as a pillar to support his roof.

They tell how Isis having learnt all this by the divine breath of fame, came to Byblus, and sitting down by the side of a spring all dejected and weeping spoke not a word to any other persons, but saluted and made friends of the maid servants of The Queen, by dressing their hair for them, and infusing into their bodies a wonderful perfume out of herself; when The Queen saw her maids again, she fell a longing to see The Stranger, whose hair and whose body breathed of ambrosial perfume; and so she was sent for, [and] becoming intimate with the queen, was made nurse of her infant.  

The King’s name they say was Malacander, herself some call Astarte, others Sooses, others Neinanoë, who is the same with the Greek Athenais.

Isis is said to have suckled the child by putting, instead of her nipple, her finger into his mouth, and by night she singed away the mortal parts of his body. 

She turned herself into a swallow and flew around the pillar until The Queen watched her, and cried out when she saw her child all on fire, and so took away the boy’s immortality. 

Then The Goddess, manifesting Herself, asked for The Pillar of The Roof, and having removed it with the greatest ease, she cut away the Erica that surrounded it. 

This plant she wrapped up in a linen cloth, pouring perfume over it, and gave it in charge of The King; and to this day the people of Byblus venerate the wood, which is preserved in the temple of Isis.

Plutarch

Morals



 

 

 

BILL MOYERS: 
What did you mean, Joe, when you said that the triumph of Tristanís view of Love and Vision of Love, this beginning of Romantic Love in The West was ìLibido over Credoî?

JOSEPH CAMPBELL: 
Well, the credo, ìI Believe,î and I believe not only in the laws, but I believe that these laws were instituted by God, and thereís no arguing with God. I mean, these laws are just a heavy weight on me, and disobeying those is sin, and it has to do with my eternal character.

BILL MOYERS: And The Libido?

JOSEPH CAMPBELL: The Libido is the impulse to life.

BILL MOYERS: Comes from where?

JOSEPH CAMPBELL: Comes from The Heart.

BILL MOYERS: And The Heart is what?

JOSEPH CAMPBELL: The Heart is the organ of opening up to somebody else. Thatís the human quality, as opposed to the animal qualities, which have to do with, primarily with self-interest. Opening up to that which is other is the opening of The Heart, and thatís as the troubadours saw it, it is the opening of The Heart.

BILL MOYERS: I can certainly understand, though, why The Church was threatened by this, because how can you have a church if everyoneís libido is his or her Own God?

JOSEPH CAMPBELL: Why not? Why canít The Church handle that? If you can sanctify a marriage that has been arranged, why canít you sanctify a marriage where two people have joined each other?

BILL MOYERS: So the courage to love became the courage to affirm against Tradition, whatever knowledge stands confirmed in oneís own experience.

JOSEPH CAMPBELL: Yeah.

BILL MOYERS: Why was that important in the evolution of The West?

JOSEPH CAMPBELL: Well, it was important in that it gives The West this accent, as Iíve been saying, on the individual, that he should have faith in his experience, and not simply mouth terms that have come to him from other mouths. I think thatís the great thing in The West. The validity of the individualís experience of what humanity is, what life is, what values are, against the monolithic system.

BILL MOYERS: Was there some of this in the legend of the Holy Grail?

JOSEPH CAMPBELL: Yes. Wolfram has a very interesting statement about the origin of the Grail. He says the Grail was brought from heaven by the neutral angels. There was the war in heaven between God and Lucifer, and the angelic hosts that sided one group with Lucifer, and the other with God. Pair of opposites, good and evil, God and Satan. The Grail was brought down through the middle, the way of the middle, by the neutral angels.

BILL MOYERS: What is the Grail representing, then?

JOSEPH CAMPBELL: Well, the Grail becomes the, what we call it, that which is attained and realized by people who have lived their own lives. So the story very briefly is of this ó Iím giving it now as Wolfram gives it ó but this is just one version. The Grail King was a lovely young man, but he had not earned that position. And the Grail represents the fulfillment of the highest spiritual potentialities of the human consciousness. And he was a lovely young man, and he rode forth from his castle with the war cry, ìAmor!î And as heís riding forth, a Moslem, a pagan warrior, a Mohammedan warrior, comes out of the woods, a knight. And they both level their lances at each other, they drive at each other, and the lance of the grail king kills the Mohammedan, but the Mohammedan lance castrates the Grail King.

What that means is that the Christian separation of matter and spirit, of the dynamism of life and the spiritual, natural grace and supernatural grace, has really castrated nature. And the European mind, the European life, has been as it were, emasculated by this; true spirituality, which would have come from this, has been killed. And then what did the pagan represent? He was a person from the suburbs of Eden. He was regarded as a nature man, and on the head of his lance was written the word, ìGrail.î That is to say, nature intends the grail. Spiritual life is the bouquet of natural life, not a supernatural thing imposed upon it. And so the impulses of nature are what give authenticity to Life, not obeying rules come from a supernatural authority, thatís the sense of The Grail.

BILL MOYERS: 
And The Grail that these romantic legends were searching for is the union once again of what had been divided? The Peace that comes from joining?

JOSEPH CAMPBELL: The grail becomes symbolic of an authentic life that has lived in terms of its own volition, in terms of its own impulse system, which carries it between the pairs of opposites, of good and evil, light and dark. 

Wolfram starts his epic with a short poem saying, 
ìEvery act has both Good and Evil results.î 

Every act in Life yields pairs of opposites in its results. 

The Best We Can Do is lean toward The Light, that is to say, Intend The Light, and What The Light Is, is that of the harmonious relationships that come from compassion, with suffering, understanding of The Other Person. 
This is what The Grail is about.

BILL MOYERS: 
When we say God is Love, does that have anything to do with Romantic Love? Does mythology ever link Romantic love and God?

JOSEPH CAMPBELL: Well, thatís what it did do. 
Love was a divine visitation, and thatís why it was superior to Marriage. 
That was the troubadour idea. 
If God is Love, well, then, Love is God, okay.

BILL MOYERS: 
Thereís that wonderful passage in Corinthians by Paul, where he says 
ìLove beareth all things, endureth all things.î

JOSEPH CAMPBELL: 
Well, thatís the same business. Love Knows No Pain.

BILL MOYERS: 
And yet, one of my favorite stories of mythology is out of Persia, where there is the idea that Lucifer was condemned to hell because he loved God so much.

JOSEPH CAMPBELL: Yeah, and thatís a basic Muslim idea, about Iblis, thatís the Muslim name for Satan, being Godís greatest lover. 
Why was Satan thrown into hell? 
Well, the standard Story is that when God created the angels, he told them to bow to none but himself. 
Then he created Man, whom he regarded as a Higher Form Than The Angels, and he asked The Angels then to serve man. 
And Satan would not bow to Man. 
Now, this is interpreted in the Christian Tradition, as I recall from my boyhood instruction, as being The Egotism of Satan, he would not bow to Man. 
But in this view, he could NOT bow to Ban, because of his Love for God, he could bow ONLY to God. 
And then God says, ìGet out of my sight.î 
Now, the worst of the pains of hell insofar as hell has been described is The Absence of The beloved, which is God. 

So how does Iblis sustain the situation in hell? 
By The MEMORY of The Echo of Godís Voice when God said, 
ìGo to hell.î 

And I think thatís A Great Sign of Love, do you agree?

BILL MOYERS: Well, itís certainly true in life that the greatest hell one can know is to be separated from the one you love.

JOSEPH CAMPBELL: Yeah.

BILL MOYERS: Thatís why Iíve liked the Persian myth for so long. Satan as Godís lover.

JOSEPH CAMPBELL: Yeah. And he is separated from God, and thatís the real pain of Satan.

BILL MOYERS: You once took the saying of Jesus. ìLove your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may be sons of your father who is in heaven, for he makes the sun to rise on the evil and the good and sends rain on the just and the unjust.î You once took that to be the highest, the noblest, the boldest of the Christian teachings. Do you still feel that way?

JOSEPH CAMPBELL: Well, I think the main teaching of Christianity is, ìLove your enemies.î

BILL MOYERS: Hard to do.

JOSEPH CAMPBELL: I know, well, thatís it ó I mean, when Peter drew his sword and cut off the servantís ear there, in the Gethsemane affair, and Jesus said, ìPut up your sword, Peter,î and put the ear back on, Peter has been drawing his sword ever since. And one can speak about Petrine or Christian Christianity in that sense. And I would say that the main doctrine of Christianity is the doctrine of Agape, of true love for he who is yours, him who is your enemy.

BILL MOYERS: How does one love oneís enemy without condoning what the enemy does, accepting his aggression?

JOSEPH CAMPBELL: Well, Iíll tell you how to do that. ìDo not pluck the mole from your enemyís eye, but pluck the beam from your own,î do you know?

Now, I have a friend whom I met by chance, a young Buddhist monk from Tibet. You know, in 1959 the Communists crashed down and bombed the palace of the Dalai Lama, bombarded Lhasa, and people murdered and all that kind of thing. And he escaped, he escaped at the time of the Dalai Lama. And those monasteries, I mean, there were monasteries with 5,000 monks, 6,000 monks, all wiped out, tortured and everything else. I havenít heard one word of incrimination of the Chinese from that young man. There is absolutely no condemnation of the Chinese here. And you hear this from the Dalai Lama himself. You will not hear a word of condemnation. This recognition of the way of life through which that vitality of the spirit is moving in its own way. I mean, these men are sufferers of terrific violence, and thereís no animosity. I learned religion from them.

BILL MOYERS: Do most of the stories of mythology, from whatever culture, say that suffering is intrinsically a part of life and that thereís no way around it?

JOSEPH CAMPBELL: I think Iíd be willing to say that they do. I canít think of anything now that says if youíre going to live, you wonít suffer. Itíll tell you how to understand and bear and interpret suffering, that it will do. And when the Buddha says there is escape from suffering, the escape from sorrow is nirvana. Nirvana is a psychological position where you are untouched by desire and fear.

BILL MOYERS: But is that realistic? Does that happen?

JOSEPH CAMPBELL: Yes, certainly.

BILL MOYERS: And your life becomes what?

JOSEPH CAMPBELL: Harmonious, well-centered and affirmative of life.

BILL MOYERS: Even with suffering.

JOSEPH CAMPBELL: Exactly. Thereís a passage in Paulís Epistle to the Philippians, isnít there? Be as Christ, for Christ did not think godhood something to be hung on to, to be clung to, but let go and came down and took life in the form of a servant, a servant even unto death. Letís say, come in and accept the suffering, and affirm it.

BILL MOYERS: So you would agree with Abelard in the 12th century, who said that Jesusí death on the cross was not as ransom paid, as a penalty applied, but it was an act of atonement, atonement at one with the race.

JOSEPH CAMPBELL: 
Thatís the most sophisticated interpretation of why Christ had to be crucified. 
Abelardís idea was that this Ö oh, this is connected with The Grail King and everything else Ö that The Coming of Christ to be crucified and illustrating thus The Suffering of Life, removes Manís Mind from commitment to the things of This World in compassion. Itís in compassion with Christ that we turn to Christ, and so the injured one becomes the savior. It is the suffering that evokes the humanity of the human heart.

BILL MOYERS: So you would agree with Abelard that mankind yearning for God and God yearning for mankind in compassion met at that cross.

JOSEPH CAMPBELL: Yes. And by contemplating the cross, you are contemplating the true mystery of life. And that love for this experience, no matter how horrific the experience, the love for it

BILL MOYERS: So thereís joy and pain in love.

JOSEPH CAMPBELL: Yeah, there is. Love, you might say, is the burning point of life, and since all life is sorrowful, so is love. And the stronger the love, the more that pain, but love bears all things. Love itself is a pain, you might say, but is the pain of being truly alive.

BILL MOYERS: As Joseph Campbell pursued his quest across Europe for the stories of love and chivalry, he paused often to visit the great cathedrals. They too reflected the glory of love, the love of Mary, mother of God. Reverence for the power of the female is another grand theme in ancient mythology. In the primitive planting cultures, woman contributed importantly to the economic life of the community by participating in the growing and reaping of crops. And as the mother and nourisher of life, she was thought to assist the earth symbolically in its fertility. In fact, some believe there was even a golden age of the goddess until she was driven from the imagination by the emergence of patriarchal authority.

Of late, however, scientists have resurrected the name of an ancient goddess, Gaia, to express the idea of Earth as a living body on which we depend for life. In the last half of this conversation with Joseph Campbell, he takes us back to the time when the love of God meant the love for mother goddess, and he unites these themes in one image, the virgin birth, which to him represents the birth of spirit from matter, the birth of compassion in The Heart.

(interviewing) The Lordís Prayer begins, ìOur Father which art in heaven.î

JOSEPH CAMPBELL: Yes.

BILL MOYERS: Could it have begun, ìOur Motherî?

JOSEPH CAMPBELL: This is a metaphorical image, this is a symbolic image, and to make the point that itís not your father, your physical father, we have ìOur Father who art in heaven.î But heaven again is a symbolic idea, where would it, heaven, be? It is no place. All of the references of religious and mythological images are to planes of consciousness or fields of experience potential in the human spirit, and these are to evoke attitudes and experiences that are appropriate to a meditation on the mystery of the source of your own being, I would say. So there have been systems of religion where the mother is the prime parent, the source, and sheís really a more immediate parent than the father, because one is born from the mother, and then the first experience of any infant is the mother, so that the image of woman is the image of The World. You might say that mythology is simply a translation of The World into a Mother image. We talk of Mother Earth and so forth.

BILL MOYERS: But what happened along the way, Joe, to this reverence that in primitive societies was directed toward the goddess figure, the great goddess, the Mother Earth? What happened to that?

JOSEPH CAMPBELL: That comes in primarily with agriculture and the agricultural societies.

BILL MOYERS: Fertility and all of that?

JOSEPH CAMPBELL: It has to do with the earth, the human woman does give birth as the earth gives birth to the plants. She gives nourishment as the plants do. So woman magic and earth magic are the same, they are related. And the personification, then, of this energy which gives birth to forms and nourishes forms is properly female. And so it is in the agricultural world of ancient Mesopotamia, the Egyptian Nile, but also in the earlier planting culture systems, that the goddess is the mythic form that is dominant.

BILL MOYERS: Because of this obvious perception of creation issue, fertility.

JOSEPH CAMPBELL: Thatís right, and when you have a goddess as the creator, itís her own very body that is the universe. She is identical with the universe. And in Egypt, you have the mother heavens, Nut, the goddess Nut, who is represented as the whole heavenly sphere.

BILL MOYERS: So it would be natural for people trying to explain the wonders of the universe to look to the female figure as the explanation for what they saw in their own lives.

JOSEPH CAMPBELL: Not only that, but then when you move to a philosophical point of view, the female represents what in Kantian terminology we call the forms of sensibility. The female represents time and space itself. She is time and space, and the mystery beyond her is beyond pairs of opposites, so it isnít male and it isnít female. It neither is nor isnít, but everything is within her, so that the gods are her children. Everything you can think of, everything you can see, is the production of the goddess.

Oh, this is a wonderful story. The Vedic gods are together and they see a strange son of amorphous thing down the way, like a kind of smoky fog. And they say, ì Whatís that?î They donít know what it is. And Agni, the god of fire, says, ìIíll go find out who that is.î So he goes up to this smoky thing and he says, ìWho are you?î And from the smoky thing the voice says, ìWho are you?î And he says, ìIím Agni, Iím the lord of fire, I can burn anything.î And out of the fog there comes a piece of straw, it falls on the ground, it says, ìLetís see you burn thatî He canít burn it. He goes back, he says, ìThis is strange.î

Well, Vayu, the lord of winds, says, îIíll try.î So he goes and the same thing, ìI can blow anything around.î Throws it down, ìNow, letís see you blow thatî Well, he canít. He goes back. Then a woman arrives, a beautiful, mysterious, mystic woman. And she instructs the gods and tells them who that is. ìThat is the ultimate mystery of being, from which you boys have received your strength. And he can turn it on or off for you,î you know. And there she comes as the one who illuminates the gods themselves concerning the ultimate ground of their own being.

BILL MOYERS: Itís the female wisdom.

JOSEPH CAMPBELL: 
It's the female as the Giver of Forms. 
She is the one who gave the forms and she knows where they came from.

BILL MOYERS: I wonder what it would have meant to us if somewhere along the way, we had begun the prayer ìOur Mother,î instead of ìOur Father.î What psychological difference would it have made?

JOSEPH CAMPBELL: Well, it makes a psychological difference in the character of the cultures. You have the basic birth of civilization in the Near East with the great river valleys then as the main source areas, the Nile, the Tigris-Euphrates, and then over in India, the Indus valley and later the Ganges. 


This is The World of The Goddess
all these rivers have Goddess names finally.

Then there come the invasions. These fighting people are herding people. 
The Semites are herders of goats and sheep, and the Indo-Europeans of cattle. 

They were formerly the hunters. 
They translate a hunting mythology into a herding mythology, but itís animal oriented. 

And when you have Hunters you have Killers, and when you have Herders, you have Killers, because theyíre always in movement, nomadic, coming into conflict with other people and they have to conquer the area they move into. 
This comes into the Near East, and this brings in the warrior gods, like Zeus, like Yahweh.

BILL MOYERS: 
The sword and death, 
instead of fertility.

Remember Lot's Wife: Diabolical Narcissism, the Overarching Global Patho...

 

 

Ann Barnhardt on "Diabolical Narcissism" - "I strongly encourage mirroring and reproduction of my videos. The intent of my video presentations is solely to educate, and the best way to combat censoring is to reproduce and spread the content." For further reading on Narcissism: www.samvak.tripod.com www.Halcyon.com The book "People of the Lie" by M. Scott Peck "People who are evil attack others instead of facing their own failures. Peck demonstrates the havoc these people of the lie work in the lives of those around them. He presents, from vivid incidents encountered in his psychiatric practice, examples of evil in everyday life." People of the Lie - complete Audiobook by M. Scott Peck (on YouTube) https://youtu.be/IT1qj4pTo0I Ann Barnhardt's website is www.Barnhardt.biz Source Video: https://youtu.be/X4dtcwv5dPM

 

I Got Light

Gran Torino Confession

Those Who Have Swords
and Know How to Use Them
But Keep Them Sheathed
Will Inherit The World.

Jason, Horus and Christ: Power of Mars for New Beginning


Sistar MyRa Moss | Jason, Horus and Christ: Power of Mars for New Beginning

Seven Virtues, Seven Noble Arts, Seven Champions of Justice

Magic lantern slide c. 1880.
Seven.
Albert G. Mackey, in his Encyclopaedia of Freemasonry writes two pages on the number seven, claiming : "Seven is a sacred number in Masonic symbolism."1
But the point must be stressed that The Number 7 is not a "sacred" number in masonic ritual, it is a "significant" number.

The sacredness or importance of the number seven in many belief systems, mythologies and cultures is recognised by knowledgeable freemasons but the number itself is not specifically masonic.
Geometry was considered one of The Seven Noble or Liberal Arts and Sciences, the others being Grammar, Rhetoric, Logic, Arithmetic, Music and Astronomy.

In ancient Kemet, or Egypt, the number seven represented completion.

Creation
took place in seven time periods. There are seven colours in the rainbow, seven notes in a musical scale, seven days in a week, &c.
In Ancient Kemet, there were also Seven Cardinal Principles/Virtues of The Goddess Ma'at to achieve human perfectibility. These principles are Truth, Justice, Balance, Order, Compassion, Harmony, and Reciprocity.
In Freemasonry Seven Brethren are required to Open or Work a Lodge: 3 Master Masons, 2 Fellowcraft and 2 Entered apprentice.

While those fascinated by numerology will make much of the two rows of seven tassels found on most Master Mason aprons, this was an aesthetic choice made by regalia makers and has no masonic significance.


The Number 7 was said to be 'Perfect' because it contained the numbers 3 and 4 — 3 and 4, The Triangle and The Square, the Perfect Figures — and was itself indivisible and could not be created by multiplication.
Some freemasons will claim that together the seven officers represent how human consciousness works. They represent the co-ordinated parts connecting Man's outer nature with his inmost Divine Principle. They provide the necessary channels for the various spiritual and material levels to maintain contact. This, like much hermetic and sacred teachings, is not fundamental to masonic teachings but should be of interest to all students of Freemasonry.

1. See : phoenixmasonry.org for full text.
Image : Magic lantern slide 18 "The Seven Liberal Arts." c. 1880. Unknown provenance.

Monday, 25 January 2021

Whatever The Justice of Their Application






“The NGO workers who are tasked with getting the people off these rickety boats in the middle of the sea have terrible stories to tell. 
 
When a boat is spotted at any time of the day or night and the workers are not on an official vessel, they have an hour or two at most to get down to the harbour. One worker says that when the migrants board the naval vessel at sea, or the harbour on land, they are told ‘You’re in Italy!’ 
 
Then the workers reassure them that they are safe. Again, apart from the Eritreans most are very happy and smile. In the countries they come from, people are suspicious of officials and especially of police, so for third parties to reassure the migrants that here in Europe the police and officials will actually work for them is a very important reassurance. One NGO worker relates that the first thing she says to the migrants when they get onto the naval vessel in the middle of the sea or into the dock at Lampedusa is simply, ‘Welcome to Europe.’ 
 
After what the migrants have been through even before the treacherous crossing from North Africa, it is hardly surprising that many of them arrive at Lampedusa exhausted and traumatised. Some will have lost a family member on the journey. 
 
In 2015 a big Nigerian man sat on the harbour ground weeping like a child and hitting it with his hand. The boat he had come in on had gone down and though he had saved one of his children, his wife and another of his sons had drowned in front of him. 
 
Yet still they come, knowing the risks, because for all the stories of sinking boats and deaths on board, most of those who set out will stay afloat, reach Italian waters and once there become European citizens. Whether they are fleeing political, religious or sectarian persecution, or whether they are after a better life in the Developed World, ALL will claim Asylum. 
 
Many will have legitimate claims and Italy has a duty to give these people asylum: under the Geneva Conventions and the EU Dublin Treaty the first country into which a migrant enters and claims asylum is the country that must assess the claim and offer protection. 

But the bitter Truth is that there is almost no way to find out Who is Who, or What is True. 
 
If the flow of applicants was not at the levels it has been for years then the finger-printing, interviews and everything else that follows could be carefully assessed. Backstories could be cross-checked and followed up on. But with the arrivals coming at this speed and in these numbers there was never any chance of this. 
 
Two other elements make all of this far worse. Many – and sometimes most – of the people arriving deliberately bring no paperwork with them because being unidentified is an advantage. 

[ In a civilised Society, they cannot deport you, repatriate you, try you, jail you or execute you when They don't know Who You Are -- ]

Amid the demands on the time of the agencies people can pretend to be other ages, other people or even from another country. 
 
When it became known that a particular group were being put to the front of the asylum queue – Syrians, for instance – then a large number of people would claim to be Syrians, even though some of those working with the refugees noticed they were neither speaking any Syrian dialect nor knew anything about the country they claimed to be from. 

This phenomenon is at least partly caused by NGOs that advocate for any and all migration into Europe as part of the ‘borderless world’ movement. As the flow of migrants grew in the 2010s, some NGO groups decided to help migrants before they even got to Europe. They provided easily accessible information on the web and on phone apps to guide would-be Europeans through the process. This included advice on where to go and what to say once there. 

Front-line workers notice that as time goes on the awareness of the migrants about what will happen to them and what they should expect becomes ever clearer. In part this is the result of word filtering back to their countries of origin from people who have successfully made the journey. But it is also because a movement exists that seeks to teach migrants how to stay in Europe whatever the justice of their application. All these groups are correct in their assumption that in the twenty-first century Italy has neither the money, time nor will to painstakingly go through every application. 

Of course, there are people who are refused asylum, at which point they can appeal the decision. But even if their appeal is turned down it is rare for anything further to happen. It is hard to find any cases of someone arriving in Italy, being refused the right to remain and then being sent back to their home country. Very occasionally someone who has been convicted of a crime in Italy is repatriated. But even then the bar is set exceptionally high. It is easier to let everyone dissolve into Italy and then into Europe than it is to hold the line of the law. The Truth is that once you survive Lampedusa’s waters you are in Europe for good. 

Of course, even those who may be lying about asylum are looking for an infinitely better life than the one they have left behind. 
 
From Lampedusa it seems easy to imagine schemes to distribute this vast and continual wave of people equitably and harmoniously across the continent. But anybody who knows even just Italy should know better than this. Aside from the tiny number of earlier and better-off migrants, most people who arrive will eventually find themselves sleeping outside the train station in Milan or in a car park in Ravenna. The lucky ones will end up working for gangs or trying to sell imitation luxury goods on the bridges of Venice or down the side streets of Naples. Whenever they see a policeman or the flash of a police car’s lights they will hurriedly gather up their counterfeit bags or wheel away their tray of imitation-brand sunglasses and hurry from the scene. 
 
They may be more protected, free and safe than they were at home, but their future can hardly be said to be bright. 
 
And Lampedusa is only one small island. During recent years boats full of migrants have also come ashore on the islands nearest to Lampedusa, including Malta and Sicily. In 2014 alone – the year before the migrant crisis ‘began’ – 170,000 people arrived this way. 
 
Officials talk of solving the problem by filling Libya’s recent government vacuum. But they forget that the flow of migrants continued even during the period when European governments (including the French) were paying bribes to Gaddafi. And they forget that the boats do not only head out from Libya, but also launch from Egypt, Tunisia and Algeria. 
 
What is more, this is in any case only one route. 
 
Over to the west of the Mediterranean is another route entirely, going up from Morocco and into Spain. Migrants have flowed across this narrowest gap between Africa and Europe, the Straits of Gibraltar, for decades. And despite Morocco having the best relations of any North African government with any European country – and therefore the best chance of doing deals to stop the smugglers – the migration to Spain has not been stopped. 
 
Indeed, during the early 1990s the movement of migrants through this route proved to be a harbinger of what was to come. In those days the going rate for the people-smugglers to traverse 10 miles of sea was $600. Then as now boats set off on a daily basis and the bodies of those who didn’t make it (often because the smugglers make migrants swim the last portion of the journey) washed up on the beaches of Spain. 
 
Then, as now, the movement was not only continuous but diverse. One report from 1992 documented that of 1,547 illegal migrants detained by the Spanish authorities in Tarifa alone over a ten-month period, there were 258 Ethiopians, 193 Liberians and 64 Somalis. 
 
As the report observed, ‘word of the new route had spread far beyond Morocco, with not only Algerians and growing numbers of sub-Saharan Africans, but also Filipinos, Chinese and even the occasional Eastern Europeans among those detained’. Among those who were fleeing, some were escaping oppression while others were simply looking for work or a better quality of life. 
 
As Santiago Varela, Spain’s then Deputy Interior Minister, said, ‘In North Africa, there is a structural problem. We don’t know how its political and economic situation will develop. And the demographic pressure is enormous.’ He was referring to a situation in which even then 70 per cent of the Moroccan population was under the age of 30 and official unemployment figures sat at 17.5 per cent. ‘You can’t yet compare our problem with that of other European countries,’ Varela said. ‘But it’s a warning of what can happen here in the future. Spain has passed very quickly from being a land of emigration to one of immigration.’ 
 
Varela was speaking after a period in which North Africans who had previously headed towards France and Belgium were instead looking to find jobs in Italy and Spain at a time when neither country required visas. The migrants could enter either country as tourists and then travel on to the rest of Europe. And part of the pull factor even then was Europe’s commitment to lower the internal borders between countries, making free movement easy once anyone was in Europe. 
 
In the 1990s efforts to clamp down on illegal entries were hampered by Morocco’s refusal to take back any non-Moroccans who had left the country. Thus, as one Spanish official noted, even if the government did manage to deter boats in his region, ‘They’ll find other ways of getting in. They’ll use bigger boats and land away from here. They’ll try Italy or Portugal. While there’s so much misery over there, they’ll keep coming.’
 
Although efforts to stem the flow of migrants has been more successful in Spain than in Italy or Greece, the flow still continues today. In the 2010s it is concentrated on the Spanish North African enclaves of Melilla and Ceuta, which remain tantalising positions for anyone seeking to make their way into Europe. Regular efforts by migrants to break down the fences and walls surrounding the enclaves mean clashes with police and frequent unrest. At the same time – and powerful though the pressures of those enclaves remain, the migrant boats still continue to head for the Spanish mainland or tiny pieces of territory like the islet of Alboran. In December 2014 in bad seas one boat of more than fifty sub-Saharan Africans headed off from near Nador in northern Morocco to the southern coast of Spain. 
 
The Cameroonian Muslim captain blamed the bad weather on a Nigerian Christian pastor who was praying on board. The captain and crew beat the pastor and threw him overboard before searching the other passengers, identifying the Christians, then beating and throwing them overboard in the same manner. This is only one more major route – one that has existed for years and where once again nothing is new but the scale. It was to this other side of the Mediterranean that the world’s attention turned in the crucial year of the crisis.
 
 

A Man of Many Parts

 .
 
• REMEMBER •









  
 
 
McCOY: 
He's really not dead. 
As long as we remember him.
 
KIRK: 
'It's a far, far better thing I do 
than I have ever done before. 
...A far better resting place 
that I go to than I have ever known'.
 
CAROL: 
Is that a poem?
 
KIRK: 
No, no. 
 
Something Spock was
trying to tell me
 
On my birthday.



 
 
 Buffy blows up The Judge - Buffy the Vampire Slayer
 
 
WILLOW : 
Do you think he's dead?
 
BUFFY,
The Vampire Slayer : 
We can't be sure --
Pick up The Pieces and keep 'em seperate.
 
 
 
 
 ANGEL :
It's a Legend. Way before My Time. 
 
Of a demon brought forth to rid The Earth of The Plague of Humanity. 
To separate The Righteous from The Wicked... 
 
And burn The Righteous Down. 
 
They called him The Judge.
 
 
 GILES : 
The Judge? This is he?
 
 ANGEL :
Not all of him.
 
I'm still needing backstory here.
 
 GILES :
Erm... He...
He couldn't be killed, yes?
Erm... An army was sent against him. Most of them died.
But finally they were able to dismember him,
but... not kill him.
 
 ANGEL :
The pieces were scattered,
buried in every corner of The Earth.
 
 
So all these parts are being brought here?
 
BUFFY,
The Vampire Slayer :
By Drusilla.
The vamps outside were Spike's men.
 
 ANGEL :
She's crazy enough to do it.
 
BUFFY,
The Vampire Slayer :
Do what? Reassemble The Judge?
 
 ANGEL :
Bring forth Armageddon.
 
CORDELIA :
Is anybody else gonna have cake?
 
We need to get this out of town.
Angel.
 
 ANGEL :
What?
 
You're the only one that can protect this thing.
 
BUFFY,
The Vampire Slayer :
What about me?
 
You're gonna skip town for a few months?
 
 ANGEL :
I gotta get this to the remotest region possible.
 
BUFFY,
The Vampire Slayer :
But that's not months.
 
 ANGEL :
I can catch a cargo ship to Asia...
 
BUFFY,
The Vampire Slayer :
You know, flying machines are safer than they used to be.
 
 ANGEL :
I can't fly. There's no sure way to guard against the daylight.
I don't like this any more than you do, Buffy.
But there's no other choice.
 
BUFFY,
The Vampire Slayer :
When?
 
 ANGEL :
Tonight. As soon as possible.
 
BUFFY,
The Vampire Slayer :
But it's my birthday.
 
 
We are assembled here today to pay final respects to our honoured dead. 
 
And yet it should be noted that in the midst of our sorrow, this death takes place in the shadow of new life, the sunrise of a new world, a world that our beloved comrade gave his life to protect and nourish. 
 
He did not feel that sacrifice a vain or empty one... 
and we will not debate his profound wisdom at these proceedings. 
 
Of my friend, I can only say this —
Of all the souls I have encountered in my travels....
 
His was the most 
 
...Human.
 
 
SULU : 
Honours, ...hup!
 
(bagpipes play 'Amazing Grace' as the torpedo coffin is fired)
 
[Kirk's quarters]
 
KIRK: 
Come.
 
DAVID: 
I don't mean to intrude.
 
KIRK: 
No, not at all. ...I should be on the bridge.
 
DAVID: Can I talk to you for a minute?
KIRK: I've poured myself a drink. Would you like it?
DAVID: Lieutenant Saavik was right. You never have faced a death.
KIRK: No, not like this. I haven't faced death. I've cheated death. I tricked my way out of death ...and patted myself on the back for my ingenuity. ...I know nothing.
DAVID: You knew enough to tell Saavik that how we face death is at least as important as how we face life.
KIRK: Just words.
DAVID: But good words. That's where ideas begin. Maybe you should listen to them. I was wrong about you and I'm sorry.
KIRK: Is that what you came here to say?
 
DAVID: 
Mainly. ...And also that I'm ...proud, ...very proud ...to be your son.
 





Captain's log, stardate 8141.6
 
Starship Enterprise departing for Ceti Alpha Five to pick up the crew of the U.S.S. Reliant. 
All is well. 
 
And yet I can't help wondering about the friend I leave behind. 
'There are always possibilities' Spock said. 
 
And if Genesis is indeed 'Life from death', 
I must return to this place again.
 
 
[Enterprise bridge]
 
McCOY: 
He's really not dead. 
As long as we remember him.
 
KIRK: 
'It's a far, far better thing I do 
than I have ever done before. 
...A far better resting place 
that I go to than I have ever known'.
 
CAROL: 
Is that a poem?
 
KIRK: 
No, no. 
 
Something Spock was trying to tell me. 
On my birthday.
 
McCOY: 
You okay, Jim? 
How do you feel?
 
KIRK: 
Young. I feel young.
 
(the torpedo coffin lays in a clearing in the new, verdant forest on the Genesis planet)
 
Spock's Voice :
 
Space — The Final Frontier.
 
These, are the continuing voyages of the Starship ‘Enterprise'.
 
Her ongoing mission, to explore strange new worlds…
to seek out new life-forms and new civilisations...
 
To boldly go
Where no man has gone
Before --

Sunday, 24 January 2021

We Come in Victory

  



They are coming. 

Atom by atom, 
They will coil around us 
and take all that we are. 

There is one way to confront this threat. 

By reuniting the 24 Warring Houses of Our Own Empire. 

We have forgotten The Unforgettable... 
The last to unify Our Tribes: Kahless

Together, under one creed... 
Remain Klingon! 

Remain Klingon! 

That is why we light our beacon this day. 

To assemble Our People. 

To lock arms against those whose fatal greeting is... 

"We come in Victory."




WORF: 
You never told me that your wife was opposed to this marriage.

MARTOK: 
Sirella is a Woman of Strong Convictions.
 
She believes that by bringing aliens into our families we risk losing Our Identity as Klingons.

WORF: 
That is a prejudiced, xenophobic view.

MARTOK: 
We are Klingons, Worf!
 
We don't embrace other cultures, 
we conquer them! 

If someone wishes to join us, they must honour our traditions and prove themselves worthy of wearing The Crest of A Great House.

WORF: 
Jadzia is worthy.

MARTOK: 
Of course she is. 
She is an honourable woman and a formidable warrior.


WORF: 
You should say that to Sirella.


MARTOK: 
That's not such a good idea. 

I don't want her to think that I'm 
interfering in her domain.

WORF: 
Perhaps I should speak with her. 
Coming from me, 
it would not seem like a challenge to her authority.

MARTOK: 
I wouldn't do that if I were you.

WORF: 
Why?

MARTOK: 
Well, the truth is....
She doesn't like you that much either.

WORF: 
Me.

MARTOK: 
Don't let that bother you -- 
I had every right to bring you into The Family 
and she's accepted the fact that there's nothing she can do about it.


WORF: 
How comforting.

MARTOK: 
Ha! And they say that you have no sense of humour!