Sunday, 15 February 2026

Wife-in-Laws





While in The City I looked up Sweet. 


I was careful because all the heat in the neighborhood knew me. Sweet insisted I give him all the details of My Escape. He shook his skull in awe when he heard them. 


Miss Peaches had died of old age. His eyes were sad when he told me about it. Glass Top was still out West in Seattle. Patch Eye did a little bookie business for him. Sweet had lost His Glory. He looked a hundred years old. His backbone was the old white broad who owned the building. 


Sweet had just beat a murder rap. He had killed some pretty jerk from St Louis who had insulted him in the Roost. The poor chump had called Sweet an ugly, gray-ass bastard. 


Sweet had drawn his pistol on him. He prodded him into an alley. He made him kneel and then he pissed on him. This was too much to take, so The Kid lost his temper. Sweet shot him through the top of the head. Sweet was laughing, in a good mood as he told me about it. It had cost him five grand to beat it. He told me he got a wire that Red Eye got life for croaking a whore in Pittsburgh. Sweet had a complete answer to my problem. He said that since Serena hadn’t beefed I should go back into Ohio. No state was better at the time for house or street. 


Before I left I went to his john. 

The door had a padlock on the outside


He looked at me grinned, 

and said, ‛Pal, my crapper is out of order.’ 


I went downstairs to the john in the bookie joint. 

On the way out I asked Patch Eye why 

Sweet didn’t get his toilet fixed. 


The old ex-pimp, without looking up answered, 

‛Shit, ain’t nothing wrong with the crapper. 


That cold bastard has his two whores 

locked in there for fucking with his scratch. 


They been in there three days.’ 



I walked toward my car. I wondered how long Sweet would keep them there and how long the whores could live with just water. I got back from The City. I stopped downtown at Rachel’s suite. I stayed for the night. I outlined The Move. 


The next morning I was looking out the window down on The Street. There was a stooped white-haired joker dumping barrels of hotel garbage into a huge truck. It was Steve. I’d know him in hell! 


A hot-flash shot through me. I don’t know what happened after that. Rachel told me I snatched my thirty-two from my coat pocket in the closet. I ran to the service elevator in my pajamas. She followed me all the way to The Street. I didn’t say a word. The truck had pulled away when we reached the sidewalk. She got me back upstairs. 


It had been A Sucker Play for A Fugitive. Lucky for me no rollers showed on the scene. I dressed and told Rachel I’d be back later and I wanted the rest of The Stable in her joint. 


I stopped at a leather-goods shop and bought a small valise. It was about the size that A Doctor carries. I stopped at several banks and cracked some of my big bills into enough singles to fill the bag. 


I went to Mama’s to prepare The Flash. I filled it almost to the brim with singles. I put the remaining big bills on top


I was getting ready to ship My Stable. 

With my plan I could ship them without a strong fix. 


Even new whores Think twice before leaving A Rich Pimp. That afternoon they were all in Rachel’s plush suite. She was The Boss bitch. They had twenty-five dollar a day, neat rooms on the same floor. I walked in. They were smoking gangster and eager for My Speech. They were anxious to get back on The Track


I had loosened the catch on The Bag. I casually hurled it onto The Table before them. A bale of hundred-dollar bills jumped from the bag. Reefer enhances what you see. I saw on those whores’ faces that they were seeing every dollar of the mountain of greenbacks they had given me for the years I had been Their Man. Confidence flooded their eyes. I finished My Briefing and My Instructions. I had built my shining castles in the air. Brother, I could have sent those whores to Siberia, in bikinis, in The Wintertime


Keeping her wife-in-laws and my scratch straight up there in Toledo was the first acid test for Rachel as a Bottom-Woman


I stayed around Mama’s for a week. She was bugging me to embrace The Holy Ghost and The Fire. She begged me to square up and repent my sins. No, it was a little late for that. I moved on to Ohio again. Cleveland was only a short hop to Toledo. I set up a mad apartment in the larger city. Cleveland was jumping. I was ready for the best pimping of my career. Kim ran off with a wealthy white trick. I didn’t miss her. Both towns were crawling with young fine whores. The name of the game was still cop and blow. Within four months I had the three girls in Toledo and five in Cleveland. I was pimping good. I had a connection for stuff. All was perfect except for one thing. Rachel’s Name was ringing. Every pimp, con man and rich dope-peddler was shooting for her. They offered soft, irresistible propositions. Her head was getting as big as a pumpkin. 


I didn’t want to lose her. I had another more serious reason for wanting to hold her. If I blew her, she might pull a Runt on me and Go to The FBI


I got it through the wire that a slick con-man out of New York was using his beautiful jasper white girl as bait to cop Rachel. The same wire said that Rachel was getting weak for The Broad. I went to Toledo one early morning to Rachel’s. Sure enough there they were, the three of them in Rachel’s bed. Believe me they hadn’t gotten in there to recite bedtime stories. 


I was cool, icy as always. I let her con me that it was A Party, all business of course. That wire had described that bastard con player and his freak woman. 


I was in Trouble. If it had been any other bitch in the stable except Rachel it wouldn’t have been worth a fleeting thought. I couldn’t lose Rachel, my bottom woman, in this shitty fashion to some ass-hole con player. It could kill my career as a pimp. The news would flash in a dozen states. No, I couldn’t afford to lose her. I still had that expensive friend riding with me, that monkey on my back. Sweet would have had The Solution to this tough problem right off the top of his head. 


Sweet, the week before, had shot himself in the temple. 


He left a bitter note, ‛Good-bye squares! Kiss my pimping ass!’ 


I felt nothing when I got the wire

I left her apartment and drove out into the country. 

I spun The Wheels in My Skull. 


I got The Key to The Riddle. 


It was cruel but perfect

If it worked I’d never have to worry 

that she’d blow or cross me with The FBI. 


Rachel called me the next day. She told me she had just sent me three bills. She got them for The Party I had crashed. When she cracked, I knew I had to go through with The Cross. The three bills she was sending had to be scratch she had been holding out. That con bastard was too pretty and slick to spend three fat-ones with a whore. I had to make an honest whore of her from now on


I faked excitement when I told her about a sucker who was visiting Akron. It’s a small town, thirty miles from Cleveland. 


I told her I got a wire that The Sucker had hit The Numbers for twenty Gs. He had it all with him in his hotel room. 


I sold her that she could take it off Smooth and Easy. 

She said she would be down the next day to get briefed in detail


I had already driven to Akron and set The Stage for her. I had rented a hotel room in a fair hotel. I contacted a dignified looking old ex-slum hustler down on his luck. He spruced up a wino friend of his for The Play. 


The whole arrangement – clothes, room, and a bill apiece for the actors – came to a half-grand


The slum hustler was to wait in a pool room 

nearby for my call. Rachel got to my apartment at three P.M. 

We got to Akron around six. I told her one of the bellhops had told the sucker she would be there before seven. He was waiting for her. I slipped a small vial of mineral oil into her palm. 


I told her it was Chloral Hydrate.

Only two drops would knock The Sucker out


I told her I would be waiting in the hotel bar for her. She stopped at the desk. Sure enough he was expecting her. She went up. She came down within an hour nervous and jumpy. The sucker was out cold. She had searched the room. She couldn’t find the scratch. I went back to the room with her. 


I went through another search. 

The wino was lying there motionless. We gave up searching. 


We moved toward the door. I looked back at the wino. 

I said, ‛Say Baby, he looks bad to me.’ 


I knelt beside him blocking her view with My Back. I wiped My Brow and turned My Face toward her. My eyes were wide in alarm. I said, ‛Baby, He’s Dead I think.’ 


Most women, even whores, are terrified of dead bodies. She stood there paralysed


I said, ‛Don’t get panicky. Shut that door. I’ve got it! 


I know an underworld croaker here in town. Maybe he can bring him to. I know he will keep Hisouth shut for A  Price, even if.’ 


She knew we couldn’t leave a murdered man here. She had stopped at The Desk first before coming up. She was painfully aware of the big gap between Theft and Murder. I picked up the phone and got the pool room. 


I gave the fake doctor the hotel and room number. He came within five minutes carrying his empty bag. She couldn’t see into it. I had told her to Hide in The Closet. Too many people had seen her already. 


He stooped down beside the wino. He fumbled with his pulse, his eyelids. 


Finally he stood up and said, ‛He’s Dead. I can’t help him. 


I’ll have to call The Police.’ I could almost hear Rachel’s heart booming in The Closet. We haggled for her benefit for ten minutes. Finally we had A Deal. For five bills, he would keep his mouth shut. He would also contact a hoodlum who would get the body out of there and dispose of it. He left. Rachel and I got out of there fast. 


Driving back to Cleveland, Rachel was in a trance. She squeezed tightly against me. I kept telling her she had nothing to worry about. 


After all we were together for life and Her Secret would always be safe with Me


She found out about The Hoax years later. 


Rachel straightened up with that Murder pressure on her. Toledo was on fire and in one month my three girls got nine cases between them. I pulled them out into Cleveland. Cleveland was lousy with pimps and whores and boosters from all over the country. The mob of hustlers set the torch to Cleveland. 


By nineteen fifty-three the streets were so hot a whore was lucky to stand up a week between falls. I was a fugitive. For almost a year I never left my apartment. I couldn’t risk arrest and a fingerprint check. I was down to four girls. That year in The Apartment was cramping My Style. 


Mama had hit a romantic and financial jack-pot. She had moved to Los Angeles. She called me every week pleading with me to visit her. She wanted me to meet my new stepfather, and stay for a while. 


I kept stalling her. I had heard that the smack in California was only six percent. The Pimps out there were only half serious. This makes for bad pimping conditions. Several Eastern pimps had gone to The Coast in good shape. They had returned torn down


They said The Western whores were lazy and were satisfied with making chump change. The Western pimps had spoiled them. I gave myself logical arguments against the move to California. Why should I expose my well-trained whores to that dangerous half-ass scene out West?


What if I blew My Family out there in the hinterlands? 


I was thirty-four now. In any square profession I would have been in My Prime. As a pimp I was getting elderly. I was stern and strict on My Women. 


Rachel wired me that a stud with a stable of boosters was in town with a load of wild Lilli Anne suits and Petrocelli vines at twenty percent of retail. She got me his number the next day. 


I called him and got an appointment to look his stock over. I only left the apartment for important reasons. I decided I would cop a piece of stuff and a fresh outfit before seeing him. He was staying at a crummy hotel on the East Side. He let me into a cracker-box three-room apartment. He sounded me down to make sure of my pedigree. ‛So, you’re Iceberg, huh? I was in your town not long ago. Philly sure is hot.’ 


He knew me by reputation and that I was from Chicago. I said, ‛Yes, I’m Iceberg from the Windy.’ 


He said, ‛Say Jim, how ’bout old Red Eye? I saw him in New York last month. He’s pimping a zillion. Surely you know him.


I gave him that look, like I had caught him frenching a sissy. 


I said, ‛Listen carefully, Jack. I don’t have time for bull-shit. I knew Red Eye. 


You saw him last month, Jack? You better see a head-shrinker. You’re flipping your top. 


Red Eye caught the big one in Pittsburgh five years ago. He’s doing it all.’ 


He gave me a grin like he had swallowed a bottle of snot. 


He got the sizes from me. He said to cool it in his pad. He had to go to his stash across the street to get the merchandise. I glanced into the tiny bedroom. There was a naked broad lying on the bed. I said to myself, ‛I wonder what kind of dog that is.’ 


I went to the bed and looked down at her. She was drunk, stoned. It looked like The Runt. This broad was buxom, almost fat. I knew one way to be sure. I had lashed the blood out of her with that hanger whipping years ago. She would still have the scars. I flipped her over on her belly. They were there. I stood there looking down at her. I remembered that tough bit in Leavenworth. 


Here at my mercy was that stinking bitch, Phyllis. Just the sight of her made me crazy. I grabbed a cologne bottle off the dresser. I jerked the big top off. I got My Bag out. I dumped enough of the twenty percent stuff into the top to croak a sick junkie. She was clean. I spotted a bottle of mixer water on the floor. I filled the top and struck a match. I held it beneath the top. I rammed my gun into it. I drew up her reckoning. I stabbed the outfit into a vein just back of her knees. Her red blood streaked up into the joint. 


I was just about to press the pacifier bulb. I looked out the window. I caught a glimpse of The Joker darting across the street. He had a steamer trunk headed toward the front door of The Hotel. I froze, jerked the spike out of her. I thrust the loaded outfit inside my shoe underneath my instep. I pinned the bag to my shorts between my legs. 


I collapsed into the living-room chair just as he came through the door. I was sweating like hell. He was suspicious. He kept looking from the corner of his eye at his broad. He thought I had been riding her in his absence. I wondered how long he’d had her. 


He was a wrongdoer. He’d cut her loose when he got hip to what he had. Sooner or later someone would pull his coat. He’d find out The Runt had sent me to The Joint. I was getting what I wanted from the merchandise. 


He slipped into the bedroom and checked her cat out. I left with the dozen items I had bought. I knew I had bought going-to-California clothes. I had quizzed him about his plans. He was going to stay in Cleveland for weeks. I had to leave town. Now. Phyllis was sure to get the wire from him that I was in town. I knew she wouldn’t hesitate to drop a dime in the phone to The Heat. She had to know about The Escape. I drove away. I tried to picture the expression on her face when her man cracked to her that Iceberg had been up there alone with her while she was stoned. 


I got a flight that night for L.A. It’s fabulous when a pimp’s bottom girl can be trusted to handle his scratch and his whores. She was welded to Me by that Murder Cross. The stable would drive out later in the Hog. 


Mama was radiantly happy out there and my stepfather was a wonderful square. They lived in a big house. L.A. was worse than the reports I had gotten. I got around in Mama’s Coupe de Ville. After the second night I went into the whore and pimp stomping grounds. 


I stayed around Mama for another week then went up to Seattle. Glass Top’s name wasn’t ringing. In fact he was almost unknown. One stud told me Glass Top had croaked. 


I copped a gorgeous hash-slinger up there. I turned her out that week. Lucky I did. I lost a girl back in Cleveland. Her appendix burst. I pulled the three left into Seattle. 


After I had been in town six months, Fate dealt me one off the top for a change. My bag was empty and the stuff in town was around six percent. I had to shoot three spoons to stay well. The girls were humping up a storm, I was getting no inside grief. 


I was sitting in the Hog one day. An old withered stud walked past me. He came back and stooped down looking at me. He shouted, ‛Ice, my old pimping buddy.’ 


I took a close look. It was Glass Top. He got in. He patted the scraggly processed hair on his nearly-bald head. He’d done a long bit in the state joint. He wasn’t pimping. An old square broad was feeding him. He was a drunk. Until I left town I bought him bottles and rapped with him. 


He croaked two days after I left town. 


I ran into the croaker who aborted Helen. He had lost his license and done a short bit back East for an abortion. We started rapping a lot to each other. He knew most of the hustlers I knew so we had much in common. 


He kept telling me how bad I looked. He told me how handsome I’d been when I brought Helen to him. He needled me. He expressed doubt that I had the guts to kick


He was Game to help me kick if I was Game to kick. I decided to let him help me. He warned me I would have to follow his every instruction. He had a house in town. He still took a fast buck from his old hustle. Rachel was the only girl in The Family who knew I was hooked. None of the rest knew. I was going to stay at the Doc’s to kick. They thought I was out of town. 


He used the system of reduction. We reached the tearing, puking, none-at-all stage. Let me tell you that beautiful croaker bastard was immune and rock-hard. I tried the raving, crying con on him. He would jab a needle into me to tranquilize me, so he couldn’t hear my bleating. 


I tell you, if you have ever had the flu real bad, just multiply the misery, the aching torture by a thousand. That’s what it’s like to kick a habit. It took two weeks. I was weak, but with an appetite like a horse. In another two weeks I was Stronger than I’d been in years


The Doc will always be My Man. If he hadn’t come to My Rescue, and I had kept that habit until nineteen sixty, I would have been a corpse within a week in that steel casket waiting for me.


The Principle of Suspicion






Suspicion : 
Um, and uh just apply this 
to The Lucy Letby case. 

Um so The Principle of Suspicion is animated 
by an internal kind of personal conviction 
uh that Your Suspicion is correct 
and because it's correct you can 
proceed and act on that basis. 

Now when People with Power 
hold to This Principle then 
becoming A Suspect is enough 
for you to then be punished

Uh once you've been identified,
essentially, Your Fate is sealed

Now that principle, 
The Principle of Suspicion, 
it's it's irrational with respect 
to basing actions on evidence
but it is an effective way of 
Projecting Domineering Power

And so it strikes fear or even terror into people. 
And that's useful for getting compliance
And the principle of suspicion can also 
make for very persuasive sophistry 
because it it appeals to very 
common ways of thinking. 

You know, we all tend to think that 
our suspicions are correct and so on. 
So there's there's an appeal 
behind this principle as well. 


Um and so I take the principle of suspicion from Hegel. Um and Hegel identifies three eras when the principle of suspicion is is the kind of the defining principle of of the era. Um so he talks about the the period of Rome under the emperors. Uh he talks about the witch hunt mania in the 16th and 17th century. And and he has a brief period as well. the period of a terror uh in the French Revolution. Now reading Hegel, Hegel seems to be optimistic and thinks well we've kind of gone beyond uh operating on this principle now. But unfortunately of course the principle of suspicion uh is not is not a thing of the past. It's something that uh we still have to engage with. And so let's see how the principle of suspicion operates in practice. Um so we there's two ways it operates. You either go straight from suspicion to punishment or you have suspicion and then trial and punishment. So suspicion punishment is very simple. Uh go back to the Roman emperors. You know if the Ptorian guard are out to get you, they get you. Essentially there there's no intermediate stage. Um if you're a boat in the Gulf of Mexico and the American government are out to get you, they get you. You know, again, it's just suspicion straight to punishment. Um so so then there's the there's the three-step process has the the intermediate trial. And if you say, you know, you say a trial, well that that then you might seem that isn't a principle of suspicion because of course in a in a trial these suspicions are tested and and and that of course is correct. So in in a rational trial uh suspicions are indeed tested against the evidence. However, there are also irrational trials in which suspicions are simply fitted to the evidence. I then think that there are there are what we can call hybrid trials where there is an element of rationality in the trial and rationality and the principle of suspicion are in conflict. So as in many other witch hunt trials uh Miss Leeppley's trials I think were hybrid ones where the prosecution uh was based on the principle of suspicion and the defense was based uh on rationality. Let me then move on to Lucy Let's case. Um so the foundation of the case against Lucy Leby I think was one of pure suspicion and the form it took was one of turning an unknown into a kind of a known inner certainty. So it started out if you think about the doctors they think we do not know why the babies collapsed or died. We only know why they didn't. And therefore we do know we know that Lucy Leby did it. And I think that was the essential way in which which they fought. I think that encapsulates it reasonably well. And to justify um the the transition then from not knowing how these babies died or to knowing the persecutors of misle created so-called evidence to fit the suspicion and then refused or only pretended to test the evidence that they'd concocted. This was the evidence then that got Miss Leby convicted and she then went to the court of appeal with her plea to be appeal to to to try and be able to appeal. So let's move on then to the court of appeal uh and look at what the the judges did. So the court of appeal judgment rejecting this plea to be allowed to appeal was was thoroughly irrational I think. Um, and we can ask in penning this judgment, were Dane Victoria Sharp and Lord Justice Horoid and Mrs. Justice Lambert DBE, were they animated by the principle of suspicion? Um, I'm not sure. The idea that these judges might have been so biased is is is, you know, is is a terrible prospect. Uh but the principle of suspicion at least involves an element of sincerity um and alternative explanations of the conduct of these judges such as sort of treating the case as some kind of game or something like that. I think alternative explanations are perhaps even worse. Anyway, whatever the state of their inner consciousness of these judges, uh the court of appeal not only endorsed the irrational arguments of the prosecution, but they added more irrational arguments of their own. Um so so to show this I'm going to critically examine how the judges responded to the defense submission that with respect to intravenous uh injection of air to cause air embolism there was no case to answer that's one of the things the defense said when they wanted said you know we wanted to appeal and that submission of course was correct um this business about introvenous injection of air was founded entirely on suspicion there wasn't ever any evidence but the judges said No, there was there was a strong prosecution case uh for introvenous air injection and they argued this by fitting the expert evidence of both professor Owen Arthur and Dr. Daryry Evans to the suspicions against Miss Leby and also manipulating the evidence that the defense have put forward with defense the evidence of Professor Shulie to make this evidence appear to be quote irrelevant. I'll turn to Dr. Evans is first and and look at what the court of appeals said. So the court of appeal presented what they said was a a hypothetical account of expert witnesses reasoning that Miss Leby made introvenous air injections uh based only on suspicion and you can see it there on the the right hand side of the screen. So the court of appeal said if you know if any witness had given evidence to the effect that he or she could must identify any other possible cause of the baby's collapse and therefore assumed on that basis alone that the baby's collapse must have been due to an embolis that evidence might well be criticized as mere conjecture and that isn't in fact a hypothetical uh account. It's exactly how the expert witnesses reasoned and we can compare it with Dr. Evans when he was interviewed by Dr. Raj Prasad on intravenous air injection shortly after the trial and Dr. Evans identifies as you can see cases where your diagnosis is made by ruling out other factors and you end up with the diagnosis where this is the only explanation. You've ruled everything out. What's left is the diagnosis. However, we should add that Dr. Evans said that sometimes you had what he called a full house a full house of evidence of air embolism and that included evidence of coming from the x-rays and it included evidence with regard to skin discoration and the court of appeal made a similar claim and by dropping Dr. Revans's observation that you only sometimes have a full house, it justified its description of mere conjecture as being merely hypothetical. So according to the court of appeal, the suspicion that Miss Leby made introvenous injections are always supported by a full house of evidence. although their preferred metaphor was a constellation a constellation of factors which was kind of the suggestion that there were kind of countless pieces of evidence there. So we want to then look at how this mere conjecture that the port using portfield's term then was turned into a constellation of factors and two of the ways in which this is done uh was by having the images of gas observed in X-rays of some of the babies being said to form a basis for a diagnosis of their embulus. Again that's a direct quote from the court of appeal. And second, their argument that the skin discoloration uh seen on the babies was said to be consistent with their embolism. So I'll turn first to the x-rays. Uh and uh this is where the the court of appeals supported a pseudo test that was conducted by professor arth. So, Professor Arers, uh, a consultant radiologist at Great Orman Street Hospital and a witness for the prosecution, uh, conducted research in preparation for Mr. Leby's trial and his findings supported the defense. Uh, but he twisted them to support the prosecution. Uh, and instead of criticizing this twisting of the evidence, uh, the court of appeal reinforced it. Um, let me go on to Professor Arthur's what I call professor Arthur's real test. So, so, so Professor Arthur did a I think you know actually a very helpful and genuine test. He he he looked at the pertinent x-rays of at least seven of the babies where Lucille was alleged to have attacked them by means of intravenous injection of air. If he looked at the least seven of these babies or the X-ray images of at least seven of these babies and in imaging of three of the babies he could see gas in the great vessels meaning the blood vessels around the heart. Um what professor aras then did is he reviewed the x-rays of 500 babies who had died at great Orman Street Hospital and where there was no suspicion of intravenous air injection. Uh and he did this as the court of appeal judges put it to to satisfy himself that seeing gas was unusual as as it would be for example if uh imagine if he he'd looked at the 500 cases and he'd only seen in one or two occasions that there was uh uh there was imaging of gas in the great vessels you know only one or two times out of 500 then certainly that would be unusual but in fact professor Al's assumption was refuted because far from being unusual he saw gas in the great vessels in about a quarter of the cases in about 125 cases out of 500. So he saw it about a quarter of a time. So if gas can be seen in the great vessels about a quarter of a time about 125 times out of 500 when intravenous injection is not suspected then is seeing gas three times out of seven is that unusual? Is that suspicious? Obviously the answer is no. It isn't. Um, so as I say with with this review of 500 babies, I think professor Arthus had conducted a real test uh and one that one that showed the jurers who perhaps you know contrary to their intuition um that that seeing gas in the great vessels uh is common place and it wasn't a suspicious society at all. And what what do the judges say about this? They say nothing. um be completely silent on the implications of this finding and then they undertake what philosophers of science call a degenerative problems shift and we try again with 38 of the youngest babies and find that eight of them show gas um is that significantly different from 125 out of 500 or indeed three out of seven no it's not at this point um professor rather and the court of appeal judges run a pseudo test. There's a kind of a roof slate. They take these eight of the youngest babies uh where gas has been found and they don't ask is this unusual? We know that it's not. They ask instead is it unusual for these eight cases to have been unexplained? And and then Arthur says, well, all of these cases at Great Orman Street, we explained all of them. We exp, you know, we we knew why these babies had died. Um so it was indeed unusual for them to be unexplained and and and it was that unusualness that was then used uh by the prosecution to say well what's going on in these three cases where where Lucy Letby was said to be involved. Now there is some inconvenient facts in a sense you know who Arer has done when he's gone down to this test of eight babies. And the first thing which which I find strange is that on the face of things at least even amongst these eight babies at Great Orman Street at least one of these deaths and perhaps several of them um was unexplained because it was classified as sudden unexpected death in infancy. So that's that's a classification of death for sure but it's not an explanation is it? Um and so it's a bit odd to say that none of these eight cases were unexplained. Uh but but still that's that's just what that's what we said. Um and then another inconvenient fact is that and we've already heard about the postmortm reports. And so two of the these uh counters of Chester babies, they had postmortem reports that identified the cause of death as being result of natural causes. And again, that's ignored and they just say, "Well, it's all unexplained. It's unusual. It's suspicious." It is a basis of diagnosis of embolism, but it's not a rational basis, is it? Um so we've got these problems. We've got the fact that there is a sudden unexpected death in industry. Uh we've got a difficulty in that it is not comparing like with like. So if the doctors at the counters of Chester hospital insist on saying they do not know how babies died and if they reject postmortem findings that say that babies die from natural causes um then of course the deaths by their account are going to be unexplained. 

You can't then draw a comparison 
with doctors at another hospital 
who do not hold this kind of suspicious attitude and have accepted postmortem explanations of deaths of eight babies. You just not comparing with you can't draw any kind of comparative conclusion from that. There's also no comparative data on the babies where gas is not observed. So that no figures at all are given for any of the other 492 babies in the original test. I mean we we just don't know uh about how many of their deaths were explained or unexplained. But however we can we can assume I think that unexplained deaths were also going to have been unusual amongst these babies including the approximately 375 babies who didn't have gas uh observed in the vessels around the hut. 

Um and if we assume that that they that they also had deaths that were by and large explained all that professor Arthur has shown is this firstly shown that baby deaths or collapses at countis of Chester hospital in cases where this leby stands accused are unexplained in the eyes of the doctors there and he's shown then second that it's unusual for baby deaths at great orman street hospital to be unexplained. pain. That's all he's show. That's it. Um, let's move on to skin discoloration and making Professor Lee's evidence um irrelevant. The defense had tried to introduce the evidence of Professor Lee who argued that the skin discolorations observed on the babies were not consistent with what was known of introvenous air embolism in the medical literature. And the judges said that Dr. Lee's evidence came too late. However, although they refused formally to consider the evidence, they preserved the appearance of fairness by uh seeming to test Dr. Lee's evidence anyway and finding it. I say we found it irrelevant. Um so the court of appeal um said that Dr. Lee had missed the point and he was insisting that only one specific form of skin discoloration is sufficient to diagnose air embolism. uh but they said you know the kind of the localized transient significant skin discolorations that were so often seen in these babies um that was consistent with their embolism that's what Dr. Lee had found in his own report uh they said and that was all that that mattered. Well, of course it was in fact the judges who had missed a point when Professor Lee reviewed the medical literature uh he found there are no reported cases of localized transient skin discoloration in cases where air has been in accidentally injected into the veins. The judges discussed Dr. Lee's so-called irrelevant elements over 24 paragraphs in their judgment. Uh but they didn't mention that finding. Um they weren't really testing uh Dr. Lee's evidence at all. They were fitting it to the prosecution case by selectively citing and emitting things to make it appear that Dr. Lee was arguing one thing when in fact he was arguing something quite different. Um the court of appeal had another argument against Dr. Liam. was that even if he did have a point, it was still irrelevant as the evidence as a whole showed that Miss Letby killed or attacked babies in one way or another. And if the prosecution was wrong about intraggina's injection or anything else, this meant only that she killed or attacked the babies by some other method. 

So if we if we we remind ourselves about 
the original suspicion of The Countess 
of Chester hHospital doctors, it was 
"We Do not Know why the babies collapsed 
or died only why they didn't

Therefore, we do know 
Lucy Letby did it. 

Well, when they dismissed Dr. Lee's evidence, 
The Court of Appeal draws out, I think, 
what This Suspicion really means

The Suspicion really means 
Lucy Letby Did it and 
it doesn't matter how

Um that kind of approach, 
that suspicious approach 
is one that is unfalsifiable

Um The Argument that Miss Letby 
is Guilty because of the whole thing 
makes it impossible ever 
to acquit Miss Letby -- because 
any kind of supposed evidence 
could be fitted to A Suspicion. 

None of the evidence which 
has been made up to convict : 
None of it can withstand testing
It all comes down to cherrypicking 
or something along those lines. 
It's all meaningless

But for the very reason that it's meaningless
they can always come up with more

You know, it is literally infinite

The amount of evidence that the misled persecutors 
can bring to bear against her has no limit. 

And we've seen that again at the Fewell inquiry 
always about 40% of tubes dislodged and so on. 

So in in this way the the the the suspicion that has got Miss Leeppby imprisoned for life has become totally unassalable. Unless you can actually prove that it's impossible for Miss Ley to have carried out the attacks, it cannot be falsified. Whatever evidence is shown to be wrong, there is a ready answer. It doesn't matter she's guilty. It's the whole thing. Thank you. [Applause]

Thursday, 12 February 2026

The Psychology of Women Who ALWAYS Get What They Want



YOU MUST KEEP MOVING OR 
THE MINOTAUR WILL GET YOU

The Psychology of Women Who ALWAYS Get What They Want


DEAD END




once upon a time there was 
a girl with no dreams

she lived in the right now

then she met a boy
and his dream 
became hers

expect what he didn't realise was
she already had a dream

and that dream
was 
to be

care

free


We Bought Them



If I wanted to Lie -- or, 
if We wanted to Lie or 
wanted to exaggerate
wouldn't use, uh, 
My Daughter to Do so --

I could easily buy 
other people to Do it. 


 

The video news release, the High-tech PR blurb, Hill & Nolton generated an audio-video feast of images for the media. And one of the most compelling was Nayirah

Nayirah Al-Saud Al-Sabah :
".....I could not help but think of 
my nephew, who if born premature might, 
have died that day as well --" sniffle

She seemed to be alone before The Congressional Human Rights Caucus
identified only as “A Kuwaiti Escapee”. 

But we've discovered she wasn't alone at all. 
And she wasn't just a simple Kuwaiti escapee. 
In fact, just a few seats away was her father, 
Kuwait's Ambassador to the United States and Canada. For my people, Naara quickly slipped out of the caucus hearing back into the protective folds of her family, the extended royal family of Kuwait, headed by the Amir Jabir al- Sabah. I have to ask why she was not identified as your daughter when she gave that testimony to the House committee house caucus. Well, for security reasons, I didn't believe it was um uh just for to for her safety. Did uh the human rights caucus members and the chair people know who she was? They knew her identity. They knew her identity and they knew exactly what what the girl was telling them was the truth. How many people knew that she was the ambassador's daughter? 

....I didn't. 
I don't know who who knew --
Uh I I did not know she 
was The Ambassador's Daughter. 

When did you find out she was the ambassador's daughter? 

Uh not uh this is the first allegation 
I've had that she was 
The Ambassador's Daughter. 

Does it affect her credibility in your mind? 

I think uh it certainly should have been known uh at the time of the hearing. 

Uh it would have had bearing 
on what uh she might have said --

Yes, I think people members of Congress certainly and members of the public uh were entitled to know uh uh the source of of uh her testimony, therefore who she was --

If it became known that um it was somebody who was closely associated with obviously putting across a Kuwaiti Government position at a particular time when public opinion was very sensibly balanced in the United States at least about whether or not one should be going to war. 

It was it was a evenly balanced issue. 

Then it could well have tipped the balance one way that this was an entire show that was being arranged. 

Kuwaiti Ambassador Sheikh 
Saud Nasser Al-Saud Al-Sabah :
Whether she was My Daughter
my friendor she was somebody else -- 
I could much more easily...

If I wanted to Lie -- or, 
if We wanted to Lie 
or wanted to exaggerate
I wouldn't use, uh, 
My Daughter to Do so --

I could easily buy 
other people to Do it. 

Did you think it would affect her credibility if people knew that that she was your daughter that she was part of the 

I had no problem with credibility. 
I think the girl came and spoke and told them what she actually saw with her own eyes. That wasn't just one person. There were a series of people who saw this whole thing happening. When we went back to Kuwait and we were we we interviewed many of the people who were there, they all all the testimony corroborated each each other. They're also the same thing. There weren't any incubators left behind in Kuwait anyway. We had to buy everything. Now, they ship it. 

Now, some of the human rights groups that that raised this in the first place, notably Amnesty, Middle East Watch, say that they went back there, they that when they investigated on the ground, first of all, all the incubators were accounted for. There was no incubators gone. 

And secondly, they could the only person who had who could claim to be an eyewitness to the atrocity was your daughter. 

I'm sorry about The Report, but what they saw is the new ones we bought, because we bought them and we had them airlifted to Kuwait immediately after Liberation. 


It's a very interesting story!

Pediatrician Ian Pollock. 

Well, it's an absurdity. The the amount of I mean, as we left on the third week, they still weren't getting water and food in properly, let alone medical supplies. I mean, it was the place.. the organization was very, very poor. 


Dr. David Chu found there was equipment missing from Kuwait hospitals, things like dentists chairs and very little had been replaced, especially not incubators because they were never taken in the first place. When I asked the engineer, one of the engineers about the story and he told me that uh they should not have had such a story because if the world had known about it later on, it would have come back to haunt them. These are some of the controversial incubators. When the Iraqi occupiers heard the story that they'd stolen them and killed babies in the process, they invited journalists into Kuwait hospitals to see for themselves. But the story persisted until independent investigators arrived on the scene. Then the picture started changing. The doctor who gave amnesty the information that babies died revised the number down to It finally settled at , of which died before the Iraqis arrived. The story evaporated. The number of people who you could find who had seen premature babies who had died unnecessarily was zero. It was horrifying. But what of Na's story that as a volunteer in one of the hospitals, she saw the atrocity? Would you let us talk to the one eyewitness we've been able to find? Who's your daughter? Would you let her tell her story to us about what she saw? I believe there is no reason why she told it to the whole world. So what she has told the whole world, I think there is no reason why she'd be telling you. I mean part of the whole system. But what the world didn't know at the time was that the witnesses appearing before the Congressional Human Rights Caucus that day were carefully coached by Hilland Nolton. There was training with these individuals to help them get more comfortable with the setting, the circumstances, the questions so that they could focus on their story. You know, that was clearly one of the roles that uh that Hill Nolton was able to help them with. A cynic might suspect that a $ million public relations campaign conducted by a major sophisticated agency like Hill and Nolton may have led uh to some excesses bordering on disinformation. That's um I think an exaggeration of of the views here. There wasn't a public relations media drive to to win the the emotions of the world with the Kuwaiti people because the facts spoke for themselves. Why was it necessary to to spend $ million? Who spent $ million? I don't know. You've been trying to drive this point. Well, no, it's it's on the record. Citizens for free Kuwait paid that much money to Hill and Nolton in a period of five or six months. Well, they paid um that much money to public relation firm because they are concerned citizens who are happen to be in this country when the invasion took place and they need people to help them. But we didn't need to do so as a government as an embassy. But Hill and Nolton documents disclose that the committee for a free Kuwait includes members of the Kuwaiti government. And the PR firm provided services to the ambassador himself, including daily assessments of his public performances and image. And as the weeks went by, even his appearance changed. Now, this is the situation we're facing is how are we going to put an end to this? So, we would get uh like the Kuwaiti ambassador and things that he would say and we would be able to go back to him the next day and say out of the out of your uh things that you said in a halfhour speech, here are the three things that work really well that really hit a responsive cord in the American public. 
It's terrifyingly effective public relations and a fantastic, incredible subversion of democracy. When you begin allowing public relations firms to set the agenda to make the decision on whether in a s in a sense to to organize the debate about whether whether or not we're going to go to war. 
That's the view of John Richard MacArthur, publisher of Harper's Magazine. He's investigated the role of propaganda in selling the Gulf War and he's written a book about it coming out this spring. He's also explored the impact of that congressional hearing and a startling conflict of interest at the highest level.
 The at the time Congressman Porter and Lantis chaired the hearing on Kuwait, they also headed a private group, the Congressional Human Rights Foundation. 
MacArthur discovered a disturbing link between the Human Rights Foundation and the PR firm that was selling the war. 
The Congressional Human Rights Foundation literally operates out of Hill and Nolton's offices uh on the second floor of an an office complex called Washington Harbor in Georgetown. 
Hill and Nolton provides a $3000, in-kind charitable contribution to the Congressional Human Rights Foundation in the form of a rent reduction for the office space. The link between Hill and Nolton and the Human Rights Foundation doesn't end there. Frank Manowitz, vice chairman of Hill and Nolton, became a director of the Human Rights Foundation. And there are other interconnections. Citizens for a free Free Kuwait, donated $50,000 to the Congressional Human Rights Foundation after Iraq invaded Kuwait. a dramatic Congressman 
John Porter, co-chair of the Human Rights Caucus and now honorary co-chair of the Human Rights Foundation. the contributions that uh that uh came later from Citizens for Free Kuwait, I think were were uh given because uh they felt we had uh by holding the hearing and and allowing the American people to hear uh some of the atrocities going on in Kuwait uh were were helpful toward their goal of of ultimately freeing their country from the Iraqi invaders. 
And Hill and Nolton's connections don't just lead to the Human Rights Foundation, but straight into the White House, handling the Kuwaiti account for Hill and Nolton was Craig Fuller, chief of staff for George Bush when he was the vice president. 
Fuller attends domestic meetings, lunch meetings at the at the White House in the fall, at least one meeting where where policy uh in the Gulf is discussed. in fact, public relations policy because the meeting that Fuller goes to is all about how Bush can sell the war more effectively. 
Hill and Nolton Washington has circulated this material as the International Communications Council for Citizens for a Free Kuwait. 
To help sell the war, America's largest PR company entered the news business. Serve in in Congress in the There were daily newscasts and tempting sound bites. 
Adam is saying is uh better be worried that if he starts something we're going to finish it. 
Diplomacy alone rings hollow. 
Prayers that we pray for the peoples of Kuwait who are suffering very bitterly. 
Reports from the front. 
This is Ahmed Hammuda reporting from Saudi Arabia. 
Brought to the heartland by Hill and Nolton. 
Saddam Hussein was probably defeated in Kuwait before the American troops got there by the public relations campaign that persuaded the American people to send them. 
And I do hope that through you and through our friends in the United States, we can all find somehow any measures for rescuing my people.
 took the incubators and left the children to die on the cold floor. 
When you look back in retrospect, the things that stand out in your mind are some of those pictures, some of those images, some of those stories, and you think that in fact there was uh uh uh the kind of outcome we wanted to happen happened. 

She was a 15-year-old school girl and her story shocked an audience that extended far beyond the hearing room. 

"While I was there, I saw the Iraqi soldiers come into the hospital with guns. They took the babies out of the incubators, took the incubators, and left the children to die on the cold floor." 

Q. : Would you let us talk to the one eyewitness we've been able to find was your daughter? Would you let her tell her story to us about what she saw? 

I believe there is no reason why, 
she told it to the whole world.

Wednesday, 11 February 2026

.....We'd Better Dematerialise, First --






ring, ring --

Hello, I.T. --

Yeah, Have You Tried Turning 
it off and Turning it on again?

....Yeah, okay, bye.

(You're Welcome.)














Tuesday, 10 February 2026

My Machine can’t Think









OCTOPUS : When Legend Becomes Fact

OCTOPUS : When Legend Becomes Fact



Ostension -- 
is a term borrowed from 
The Discipline of Semiotics.
The Term We use, when 
Legend, becomes Fact --

Because People like 
to PLAY with Legends.

They'd like to Help Make 
them Become Real.

(Deny, deny, deny, die, die.)

Hundreds of stories circulate 
among millions of people —
In most cases, The Story 
simply gets passed on. 

But sometimes
The RIGHT Story contacts 
The Right Person; maybe 
The WRONG Person. 

And then The Legend is like 
A Seed that starts to GROW 
in that person's Mind, or like 
A TUNE he can't get out of his head. 

These are the people that might 
be compelled to act-out The Legend story. 

Pets HAVE been cooked in microwaves, 
for a variety of reasons.

Several people who are 
HIV-positive have DELIBERATELY slept 
with new partners, with the INTENTION 
of passing The Disease on. 

All these events happened AFTER 
The Legends describing similar events 
had become popular

Consider the 1974 
Trick-or-Treat Murder 
in Houston, Texas
An 8-year-old boy really 
WAS poisoned through 
Trick-or-Treat Candy;

His Father had taken out 
Life Insurance on 
The Boy previouslyso 
he was the one accused

His Defence was, that he'd seen 
A Hairy-handed Stranger PUT 
The Candy in the boy's bag.

The Father was convicted. 
The Judge set the following Halloween 
as the date for his execution. 

Murder by LEGEND. 
Defense by LEGEND. 
A Judge set on creating 
his OWN Halloween Legend.

We as Folklorists must acknowledge that 
so-called Urban Myths or contemporary Legends 
exist not simply as Verbal Texts  to be collected, 
transcribed, and tucked into The Archives. 

They are also Maps for Action, 
sometimes VIOLENT Action.

I mean, that's what Ostension should Teach You :

Folklore, can KILL You..!”