Thursday 21 November 2013

Oprah

 Oh, snap - Oprah is now getting the full Cokely treatment...



Mayor Sawyer`s Strange Tolerance

May 03, 1988


Confronted with evidence that one of his longtime aides is a fanatic anti-Semite who regards Christianity as a religion of white racism and the AIDS virus as an attempt by white doctors to kill off blacks, Mayor Sawyer has adopted a posture of magnanimous tolerance.

``He`s indicated to me that he did not mean those things in his heart,``

said Sawyer, who takes solace from his faith: ``I think God forgives.``

Even His mercy may be strained by the behavior of Steve Cokely, a $35,568-a-year ``coordinator of special projects`` for the city. In lectures tape-recorded for followers of Louis Farrakhan`s Nation of Islam, Cokely said that Jews run a global ``secret society`` bent on ruling the world: ``The Jew hopes one day to reign forever.`` The cross, he said, is one of the ``symbols of white supremacy`` that should be ``off limits for people of African heritage.`` The AIDS epidemic ``is a result of doctors, especially Jewish ones, who inject the AIDS virus in blacks.``



But when asked by reporters about these lectures, Cokely suffered an attack of amnesia. He insisted that he doesn`t remember attacking Jews and that he doesn`t believe in ``any uniform Jewish conspiracy.``

The mayor`s press secretary, Monroe Anderson, saw no reason anyone should hold this sort of thing against his boss: ``What Steve Cokely does on his own time, as long as it`s not illegal, is his own business.`` Skeptics may suspect that if Sawyer had a white aide who turned out to be a member of the Ku Klux Klan and ran around town ranting against blacks, the mayor would not be so indulgent.

Ald. Danny Davis likes to portray himself as a model progressive, yet he defended the retention of this neo-Nazi on the grounds that ``he has contacts and relationships that the mayor would not have otherwise.`` Well, let`s hope he wouldn`t.

Fortunately, those are the sorts of contacts and relationships that Mayor Sawyer ought to be able to do without. A mayoral aide who proselytizes for such dangerous lunatic causes is an affront to the groups he slanders and an embarrassment to all Chicago. So is a mayor who tolerates him. If Mayor Sawyer has any conscience or courage, he will fire Steve Cokely without delay. And that means getting him off the public payroll entirely, not just shifting him to a less visible job. A hate-spewing demagogue who panders to other haters and tries to sabotage civic institutions and civic goodwill should not be getting a dime of tax money, whatever his race or religion or ethnic group.


"The AIDS epidemic, he said, is ``a result of doctors, especially Jewish ones, who inject the AIDS virus in the blacks.``"



“He [Irvine California police detective Victor Ray] steered the investigation to Ford’s backyard, where men in Andromeda Strain suits would evacuate a neighborhood and haul away an arsenal of toxins, germs, plastic explosives, and guns. In the process they unearthed a trail that stretched all the way from the CIA to apartheid-era South Africa and Dr. Wouter Basson, the man who ran the country’s clandestine bioweapons program.”

“The question still plaguing federal, state, and local investigators is a simple but urgent one: what was Ford planning to do with his germs and bioweapons expertise? The discovery of militia-movement and racist literature among Ford’s papers has raised the possibility that he offered biological or chemical weapons to terrorist groups. Concerns have also mounted over a patented feature of his Inner Confidence suppository: the microencapsulation of beneficial bacteria. It turns out this architecture could double as an ideal delivery system for bioweapons, allowing otherwise fragile disease organisms to be seeded virtually anywhere. Ford, in essence, had patented the prescription for a perfect microscopic time bomb.”



(“The Medicine Man” by Edward Humes; Los Angeles Magazine; 7/2001; p. 3.)

What Happened in South Africa?







In 1998 South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission held hearings investigating activities of the apartheid-era government. Toward the end of the hearings, the Commission looked into the apartheid regime's Chemical and Biological Warfare (CBW) program and allegations that it developed a sterility vaccine to use on black South Africans, employed toxic and chemical poison weapons for political asssassination, and in the late 1970s provided anthrax and cholera to Rhodesian troops for use against guerrilla rebels in their war to overthrow Rhodesia's white minority rule.
South Africa's CBW program was headed by Dr. Wouter Basson, a former Special Forces Army Brigadier and personal heart specialist to former President P.W. Botha. Basson ran the CBW program during the 1980s and early 1990s. CBW, also known as Project Coast, was initiated in the early 1980s to provide detection and protection capabilities to the South African Defence Force. However, there was an offensive component to the program and the claims are that CBW's offensive program:

Developed lethal chemical and biological weapons that targeted ANC political leaders and their supporters as well as populations living in the black townships. These weapons included an infertility toxin to secretly sterilize the black population; skin-absorbing poisons that could be applied to the clothing of targets; and poison concealed in products such as chocolates and cigarettes. (Read the interviews with former President F.W. de Klerk, and Dr. Daan Goosen, who worked with Basson in the CBW program.)
Released cholera strains into water sources of certain South African villages and provided anthrax and cholera to the government troops of Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe) during the late 1970s to use against the rebel soldiers in the guerrilla war. In 1979 the world's largest outbreak of anthrax took place in Rhodesia where 82 people were killed and thousands became ill. Zimbabwe's current Minister of Health, Dr. Timothy Stamps, has ordered an investigation into whether South Africa was involved in the incident.
South Africa's CBW program underwent drastic changes after F.W. de Klerk became president in the early 1990s. De Klerk appointed General Pierre Steyn to investigate the CBW program and his report, known as the Steyn Report, exposed some of the alleged abuses of the program. De Klerk ordered the firing of numerous CBW scientists and officials and the destruction of all documents pertaining to CBW technology. All of the information was transferred to CD-ROMs to be kept under lock and key by the president. However, the official position of the South African government throughout the 1990s was that the program had been a strictly defensive one.
Basson was pressured to retire and became a consultant who travelled frequently, including trips to Libya which drew attention. Twice during de Klerk's presidency and once during Mandela's, the United States and Britain made démarches to express their concerns about the leaking of knowledge from the CBW program. The South African government re-hired Basson in 1995 in an effort to keep him close and under control. (Read the interview with Ronnie Kasrils, South Africa's current Deputy Defense Minister.)

In 1997 Basson was arrested on charges of selling the drug Ecstasy. During the investigation, authorities found CBW documents, which were supposed to have been destroyed, stored in Basson's home. Basson was pressured to come clean with the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), but he refused to seek amnesty and delayed testifying until July 1998. He was the TRC's last witness and gave limited testimony. People who worked for Basson, however, did testify and have applied for amnesty and qualified for immunity from prosecution.

Efforts continue on uncovering the truth of what happened in the CBW program. Basson is still employed by the government in the military's medical section and South Africa continues to have a CBW program but says it is strictly defensive. The country is now a member of the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention and the Chemical Weapons Convention.


In the context as quoted by the Chicago Tribune in the orchestrated attack on Cokely by the ADL, the JDL, AIPAC and the rump of the Richard Daly Chicago political machine, May 5th, 1988 :

"The AIDS epidemic, he said, is ``a result of doctors, especially Jewish ones, who inject the AIDS virus in the blacks.``"


And yet still, that was the most damaging quote they could cite from an hour long address to the Nation of Islam in Chicago.

The phrasing is unfortunate and blunt, but quantitatively accurate.

Board certified Certified MDs are seven times more likely to self-identify as Jewish and practicing than the average member of the public.

Jews make up 1.9% of the US general population, but 14.1% of the Medical Profession.

To clarify what the numbers refer to - 14.1% of all American physicians stated their religious faith to be "Jewish"; this does not include atheists, agnostics or convertees of a Jewish disaspora background.

I don't know what the relevant statistics are with regard to the Republic of South Africa on May 5th 1988 - but the reality of Project Coast, the South African ethnics weapons program is an established fact testified to on the record by the Truth and Reconciliation Commissions, as is the long and storied history of close cooperation and equal partnership on co-development and co-sponsorship of WMD production programmes and overlapping interests of the two pariah states of Israel and the Republic of South Africa.

There is no smoking gun to directly link the State of Israel and Israeli-sponsored physicians practicing in Sub-Saharan Africa to Project Coast and African Biogenocide;

But that is the ONLY piece of the puzzle not present.

And the only reason the final piece in the puzzle is not present is due solely to the refusal of the former Executive Director of Project Coast to name the State co-sponsor upon direct enquiry, under oath at the Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

And to be absolutely clear about the ground rules and operational dynamics of the truth and reconciliation commission - anything you admitted to, confirmed or confessed to in the record before the Commission, up to, including and beyond premeditated murder, granted that person automatic lifetime immunity from prosecution, full clemency and amnesty.

So, to be clear - this has nothing to do with burden of proof, regret or absolution.

The aim was to get the full record of the apartheid system and it's functioning indelibly etched into the historic record, first hand and without duress, so that in 100 years from now, Apartheid Denial is impossible, and there is absolutely no cleve and no quarter afforded to revisionism in any measure.

They wanted the confessions. Not vengeance, and sure as shit not justice.

If you refused to appear, or denied past crimes, you took your chances through the courts. Refusal to answer a direct question raised by the Commission in open session was taken as evidence of guilt and deception, answering absolved it.

Project Director Dr Larry Ford elected to endure a 30 month criminal murder trial rather than cooperate and answer the Commission's questions.

"Dr. Wouter Basson, the cardiologist who ran Project Coast, said Dr. Ford twice brought biological samples ''in his pocket.'' They were not dangerous, he said, and ''had no military significance.''

After the fall of apartheid, South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission conducted an extensive investigation of Project Coast. In 1998, Project Coast scientists told the commission that they had produced, among other weapons, chocolates and cigarettes infected with anthrax, milk laced with botulism, and enough cholera to cause ''massive outbreaks.''

In a 30-month nonjury trial, the judge, an apartheid-era holdover, dropped six murder charges against Dr. Basson, on the ground that the killings had occurred outside the country. Last spring, Dr. Basson was acquitted of all other charges, including murder conspiracy and drug trafficking.

In a recent interview in South Africa, Dr. Basson said he had invited Dr. Ford to lecture Project Coast scientists in 1987 because the program's Dr. Knobel had described Dr. Ford as an expert on chemical and biological weapons.

''Nothing he could offer was what we could use,'' Dr. Basson said.

Asked why Dr. Ford was later paid through the project's Swiss bank account, Dr. Basson said Dr. Knobel had told him to arrange payments for Dr. Ford's AIDS research. Both officials said they had tried to help Dr. Ford find a South African laboratory for AIDS research.

Ultimately, he was given space in an aerospace medicine laboratory to work on several projects using amniotic fluid collected from thousands of women in South African military hospitals. Why these projects were sponsored by the military, and what became of them, is unclear.

However, a South African military document about AIDS research, found in Dr. Basson's possession by investigators, mentioned ''the acquisition of any relevant C.B.W. literature from Dr. Ford.'' The abbreviation C.B.W. is commonly used to refer to chemical and biological weapons.

Perhaps the deepest fear in the entire affair was that Dr. Ford had been working with anthrax. That trail, too, has run cold.

After Dr. Ford's suicide, the police got tips that he had buried anthrax in a gold mine. They searched fruitlessly in California. Four months later, documents in a Nevada trash dump showed that Dr. Ford had been in touch with people involved in antitax and antigovernment groups. Some of them had tried to use bacteria to extract gold from dirt.

In December 2000, investigators searched a derelict gold milling site outside Henderson, Nev. They found a separator funnel, a white liquid and Dr. Ford's business card. A federal agent said they also found directions for making chemical and biological weapons, including anthrax. But that was all. The site's proprietor had recently died of unrelated causes.

As for the attempted murder case, the gunman remains unknown. The getaway driver, an accountant and friend of Dr. Ford's named Dino D'Saachs, was sentenced to 26 years to life after refusing to identify the shooter in return for leniency.

Mr. Riley, who has recovered but for a faint scar, says he never suspected Dr. Ford. He has rebuilt the company the two of them ran, and he has made a settlement with Dr. Ford's wife, Diane. She has refused requests for interviews.

Even the doctor's suicide notes, scratched out while he was conferring with his lawyer on the last day of his life, offered no clues.

Dr. Ford promised to meet his wife and three children in heaven. ''I was set up by evil,'' he wrote. ''Fear not. I will be with you forever.'' "

Prior to May 3rd 1988, Steve Cokely  had time and again won ringing endorsement both from Chicago Rabbis and other Community organisers and leaders in the Jewish community.

His job was the Community Liason Officer for the Office of the Mayor of Chicago - the most sharply decided and segregated urban community in America, bar none.

The act which placed him on death watch was NOT an act or remark either involving or making reference to the People of the Exodus or members of the Jewish Religion - what triggered the ADL onslaught and his public firing on live television was his refusal to organise City events commemerating Columbus Day in the Black Community in the South Side of Chicago, and his issuance of a press release in the form if a statement outlining his reasons.


In October of 1987, due solely to the actions and consciousness-raising efforts of Steve Cokely acting as Mayor Harold Washington's Community Liason, for the first time since the founding of Chicago, the black community of Chicago did not acquiesce to pay tribute to the Italians of the City, as they symbolically had in every year previously, opting not to recognise the presumed superiority of the Italian Community in the City via an act of submission.

They did not acceptor agree to the claim of the historic achievements and legacy of  Christopher Columbus and his heirs by honouring the holiday.

They began to organise Black History Day (now black history month) as an alternative holiday and point of historical teaching - that's the origin of Black History Month.


Cokely got blacks in Chicago to stop deferring to the Italians - through truth-telling and scholarship.

And the moment he did so, he tipped the balance of the formula: 

Intention + Capability = Threat 

and the ADL forced Mayor Sawyer to fire Steve Cokely on live television, with the prosecutor who jailed the killers of Fred Hampton and Mark Clark standing at his right arm when he did so.

And only the Nation of Islam and Congressman Gus Savage stood by the truth if his research.

And the involvement of NoI enabled the ADL to portray Cokely's position as Anti-Semitic; it wasn't. It was anti- Apartheid and Anti- Mafia; anti- exploitation.

He didn't understand the nature of the attack, and he didn't realise what was happening to him in 1988, because the mechanism of the attack and the metrics of it remained hidden.

Like Brando, his poor choice of words allowed for his remarks to be misconstrued; what is relevant is not the fact that the perpetrators were disproportionately of the Jewish religion by a factor of 7 times, what was relevant was that they were OATHTAKERS, and have a Secret Loyalty, a HIGHER loyalty than to their own or other communities.

Lawyers, for example, take an Oath to Defend the Constitution - the piece of paper that says that a negro is worth 3/5ths of a White Man, that is their highest loyalty.

All medical doctors, be they of the Jewish religion or not, swear the Hippocratic Oath upon entry to the profession - this is their highest loyalty, eclipsing all others, and as of 2006, their highest loyalty is to the following concepts:


"At the time of being admitted as a member of the medical profession:

I solemnly pledge to consecrate my life to the service of humanity;

I will give to my teachers the respect and gratitude that is their due;

I will practice my profession with conscience and dignity;

The health of my patient will be my first consideration;

I will respect the secrets that are confided in me, even after the patient has died;

I will maintain by all the means in my power, the honour and the noble traditions of the medical profession;

My colleagues will be my sisters and brothers;

I will not permit considerations of age, disease or disability, creed, ethnic origin, gender, nationality, political affiliation, race, sexual orientation, social standing or any other factor to intervene between my duty and my patient;

I will maintain the utmost respect for human life;

I will not use my medical knowledge to violate human rights and civil liberties, even under threat;

I make these promises solemnly, freely and upon my honour."

Now: let's pair two otherwise divided loyalties; - 

"I solemnly pledge to consecrate my life to the service of humanity;
The health of my patient will be my first consideration;"

No mention of PRESERVING health - or life - just servicing the needs of the the greater good termed humanity.

The other concept never ONCE referenced is "The Individual".

This oath, therefore, grants license to those pledged to it, to euthanise, chemically castrate, sterilise, tranquilise, medicate and/or lobotomise patients under their care in service to humanity.

That's exactly what it says and that's exactly what it's intended, and very carefully structured to say, and this is what the medical profession is committed to, above any other thing in life.

Even Zionist Jewish Israeli Doctors of the Jewish Religion, whether on or off of the Mossad payroll commit to this - they may swear to defend the Jewish even at the cost of their own life; but their higher loyalty even to the survival of the Jewish State and the Jewish People is the service of "humanity, before setting about anything else.

Other things never mentioned in this oath:

Healing,
Cure,
Wellness, 
Aid,
Care,
Salve,
Balm,
Sickness, 
Disease, 
Infection,
Affliction.



Now consider Magic Johnson, in relation to claimed HIV Status.

If Magic Johnson is indeed HIV+, and is infected and afflicted with the virus that will result in disease and sickness;

No one is committed in any aspect of his care to curing him, or purging his body of the infection.

They are committed to maintaining his best-achievable level of health, and respecting the fact that he is still alive;

There is no attempt being mounted to heal previous injuries to his system or make him well; the desired outcome is that he remains healthy, diseased, infected, alive, and under the best care available to maintain that condition indefinitely.

That's why Magic Johnson hasn't died; that's why AIDS will not be cured.




Why The Reluctance To Denounce Haters?

May 05, 1988|By Donna Leff. Donna Rosene Marx Leff is associate professor of journalism and urban affairs at Northwestern University and a former Tribune reporter.

Something about the Steve Cokely affair is puzzling to me.

It`s not that I find his bigoted invective surprising. It`s not that I`m offended by the lunacy of accusing Jewish doctors of injecting the AIDS virus into black schoolchildren. It`s not that Cokely maliciously slandered the late Mayor Harold Washington when he accused him of consulting Jewish advisers.



The puzzlement is that apparently Cokely has a constituency in the black community-or at least Mayor Eugene Sawyer and some aldermen perceive that he does.

One of Sawyer`s aides was quoted as saying the mayor is ``afraid of a revolt in the black community`` if he fires Cokely. And Ald. Robert Shaw (9th) said he has ``gotten a lot of calls from people in the community, and they`ve all been from folks who certainly seem to be pro-Steve Cokely.``

Even Ald. Danny Davis (29th), a reasonable man by all conventional standards, acknowledges that while Cokely`s statements ``are what one might call extremist,`` Cokely gives the mayor an important link to the ``black activist community.``

This is the same point at which I became confused when supporting Mayor Washington. During his last primary, he spoke to a Sunday morning meeting at K.A.M. Isaiah Israel, a liberal, activist Jewish congregation that counts among its members Ald. Lawrence Bloom (5th) and city planning commissioner Elizabeth Hollander. Much of Washington`s early support came from this Hyde Park Jewish community.

The meeting generally was hospitable, even affectionate. But the one sour note came when a member of the congregation, who lives across the street from Louis Farrakhan, again asked Mayor Washington why he wouldn`t denounce the Nation of Islam minister who dubbed Judaism a gutter religion. Washington mumbled (something he rarely did) that he was mayor of all Chicago, and not in the business of denouncing anyone.

His position hurt me then, and I find Sawyer`s reluctance to dismiss Cokely equally painful.

If Harold Washington and Eugene Sawyer and Danny Davis think there`s a

``black activist`` community whose support they cherish, then Chicago has more racial problems than I thought.

What kind of black activist community thinks it`s okay to spew anti-Semitic invective, to preach religious hatred, to criticize black leaders who have Jews among their advisers?

I became politically aware in the days when a black activist was someone who refused to ride on the back of the bus, who integrated lunch counters, who demanded jobs and equal opportunities for all.

I marched with my black friends in the university when they demanded a program of Afro-American studies, a meeting place for black students, more black faculty and more black admissions.

None of those black activists felt the need to make hate a part of their message of black empowerment.

Many in the Jewish community spoke out early and passionately when the civil rights movement was young. Perhaps the time has come for our black friends to support us, to show their leaders that they can succeed without the support of the haters.










JFK50: Bush Family Alibis



Yesterday afternoon at Arlington National Cemetary, Presidents Obama and Clinton joined members of the Kennedy Family for a brief wreath-laying ceremony marking the half-Centenial of their Favourite Son.

As will come as a surprise to absolutely no-one, the surviving Presidents Bush did not attend - nor, of course, did President Carter, but then he is 937 years old, and currently building houses for the poor somewhere in Tagankia with Roselyn - also, he still hasn't been forgiven for whipping Ted Kennedy's  ass in '80, but then Teddy was asking for it....

No word on whether Vice Presidents Cheney, Gore, Quayle and Mondale were invited.


There is a certain historical symmetry, here - when asked, whilst running for President in 1988, where he had been on 22nd November 1963, Bush found himself completely unable to recall - a memory which not only never returned to him, but infected both his wife and eldest son as well.


President George H.W. Bush can't remember what he was doing when President John Kennedy was killed.

And no one knows where he was on that day.

First Lady Barbara Bush can't remember what she was doing, or where her husband was when President John Kennedy was killed.

And no one knows what they were doing that day.


President George W. Bush can't remember what he was doing when Editor of George Magazine, John Kennedy Jr. was killed.

And no one knows where he was on that day.


The day President Ronald Reagan was shot in Washington, ostensibly by John Warnock Hinkley Jr., Neil Bush DID remember that he was scheduled to have dinner at the home of the son of John Hinkley Sr., the FOLLOWING day, but cancelled following adverse alarm.



George H.W. Bush hasn't been able to remember where he was at the time of John F. Kennedy's murder for more than Twenty Five Years now.


And when asked today for his whereabouts yesterday, every indication currently indicates that he is unable to remember where he was, or what he was doing all that time.


Wednesday 20 November 2013

"...and then, something something something, Timothy Dalton."



"And Rassilon journeyed into the black void with a great fleet. Within the void, no light would shine and nothing of that outer nature continued in being, except that which existed within the Sash of Rassilon. 

Now Rassilon found the Eye of Harmony, which balances all things, that they may neither flux nor wither nor change their state in any measure. 

And he caused the Eye to be brought to the world of Gallifrey wherein he sealed this beneficence with the Great Key. 

Then the people rejoiced." 



"Alright! Then call me Fred!"







JFK50: Did McGeorge Bundy's Betrayal Mark the Formal Start of theRockerfellerisation of American Public Policy...?


I don't know.

But,


Check out who witnessed this letter.

On August 8th 1974 (Lammas Eve, and the anniversary of both the Hiroshima Bomb and the Sharon Tate murders at 10050 Cielo Drive), Frenchman Emmanuel Petit performed a high ritual of performance art, trespass and Grand Larceny and made New Yorkers at last fall in love with the mononolithic Twin monstrosities debasing the built and natural environment of everywhere within view of Battery Park.

He called his private covert action of high vaudeville - "The Coup".

Governor Nelson Rockerfeller issued a blanket formal pardon to the Frenchman on the spot.

Tuesday 19 November 2013

JFK50: The FBI Online History Police




Rethinking John Lennon’s Assassination - The FBI’s War on Rock Stars, by Salvador Astucia


PART II: THE BUREAU


Chapter 4: FBI Surveillance on the Internet

The Internet Police


http://www.jfkmontreal.com/john_lennon/Chapter04.htm






The Internet Police



In the spring of 2003, I began posting my findings about John Lennon’s murder on an Internet discussion forum about the Beatles: rec.music.beatles. A few people responded in a civilized manner, but overall, the response was vitriolic, demented, vulgar, and sadistic. The participants on rec.music.beatles quickly became more interested in learning and publicizing my true identity than responding to my research. Their message was clear and uniform: Stop discussing Lennon’s murder! This reaction was not entirely unexpected. Over the past six years, I have posted political and historical commentary on numerous Internet discussion forums and typically I get similar reactions when posting controversial articles. Having stated that, the loathsome comments I received from individuals on rec.music.beatles in response to my Lennon articles stands out in comparison to other discussion forums. Usually I post to serious, political forums, so a degree of nastiness is expected. Why would I be greeted with such rudeness from an overtly light-hearted forum? It’s the Beatles, after all, so why all the fuss? Because the Beatles’ leader, John Lennon, was one of the most politically active and highly influential voices in the tumultuous Sixties.


Surprisingly, the most viscous and vulgar comments I received from rec.music.beatles dealt with a lapse in Lennon’s security on the night he was killed. The discussion centered around Jose Perdomo, the security guard tasked to protect the iron-gate entrance of the Dakota on the night Lennon was killed. As previously stated, Perdomo was an anti-Castro Cuban, a group with strong ties to the US intelligence community since the failed Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961. On June 17, 2003, I started a discussion thread entitled Jose Perdomo, doorman or security guard? It was a spin-off from another discussion between Derek Larsson and someone named Cromwell. Derek wrote: "There also seems to be a profound lack of security provided by doorman Jose Perdomo - whose job it was to protect all tenants (several of them celebrities) from strangers and hangers-on and who was the only ‘eye-witness’ to the shooting. His background needs to be investigated." Cromwell replied: "He was a doorman NOT A BODYGUARD." I disagreed: "‘Doorman’ is a misleading title," I remarked. "The doorman at the Dakota is a glorified security guard. I know because I've been there. I talked to one of the doormen. He was definitely security…The word ‘doorman’ suggests he is a bellhop. I'm not even sure if doorman is a genuine title or something the media created. The doorman does not stand by a door, he stands at the entrance of the Dakota. The entrance is about 15 feet wide with iron gates on both sides, but the gates are normally open. Derek is correct in stating that Jose Perdomo's job was to protect the tenants."


The Internet police immediately launched an assault to thwart the security-related discussion. Someone using the screen name Tna Yzarc re-titled the thread "Salvatorwriter, asshole, bumboy, neo-nazi or security guard?" I responded by changing it back to the original title and recited the poem If by Rudyard Kipling. Tna Yzarc retitled it "Salvadorwriter, moron or murderer?" I continued changing the title back and reciting If a bit more. Tna Yzarc changed the titled to "Salvadorwriter FUCK OFF AND STOP SPAMMING YOU ASSHOLE." 


Tna Yzarc then wrote the following extremely vulgar comment: "I think you're a pathetic stupid cunt and you should go back to fucking your mom." Someone named Jim sarcastically replied, "Wow - what a CLEVER response!!" Black Monk replied, "You think Sally deserves better?" Charlie Gauger (aka, Mister Charlie) remarked, "Hey, it works for me." Susan added, "A bit crude, but it works." Charlie Gauger (aka, Mister Charlie) added the following insults: "Of course, like a dog returning to its own vomit Sal comes back yet again." Someone called "Ehtue" complimented Charlie Gauger on his word choice: "What a turn of phrase! I'll steal that one for sure some time in the future! Somewhere, somehow." Fourteen sample messages in the cited discussion thread about Jose Perdomo are provided in Appendix K. (See messages 56 through 69.)


This was a thoroughly despicable display, but it was quite revealing. It was not merely a few cranks blowing off steam. The discussion itself was not political or even controversial in nature. It was politically neutral, a discussion about the crime scene where John Lennon was murdered and a probable lapse in security when the crime occurred. This is the type of information prosecutors need to bring guilty parties to justice. The ensuing assault on me was clearly a joint effort by several people, probably sponsored by the FBI, paid for by the American tax payer. To my knowledge, the topic of FBI activity on Internet discussion forums has never been discussed seriously in any book. I shall attempt to do that now, and I shall use my discussions on Beatles newsgroup, rec.music.beatles, as a case study for observing FBI activity across the entire Usenet community."

JFK50: How to Spot a Spy (Cointelpro Agent)




One way to neutralize a potential activist is to get them to be in a group that does all the wrong things. Why?

1) The message doesn't get out.
2) A lot of time is wasted
3) The activist is frustrated and discouraged
4) Nothing good is accomplished.

FBI and Police Informers and Infiltrators will infest any group and they have phoney activist organizations established.

Their purpose is to prevent any real movement for justice or eco-peace from developing in this country.

Agents come in small, medium or large. They can be of any ethnic background. They can be male or female.

The actual size of the group or movement being infiltrated is irrelevant. It is the potential the movement has for becoming large which brings on the spies and saboteurs.

This booklet lists tactics agents use to slow things down, foul things up, destroy the movement and keep tabs on activists.

It is the agent's job to keep the activist from quitting such a group, thus keeping him/her under control.

In some situations, to get control, the agent will tell the activist:

"You're dividing the movement."

[Here, I have added the psychological reasons as to WHY this maneuver works to control people]

This invites guilty feelings. Many people can be controlled by guilt. The agents begin relationships with activists behind a well-developed mask of "dedication to the cause." Because of their often declared dedication, (and actions designed to prove this), when they criticize the activist, he or she - being truly dedicated to the movement - becomes convinced that somehow, any issues are THEIR fault. This is because a truly dedicated person tends to believe that everyone has a conscience and that nobody would dissimulate and lie like that "on purpose." It's amazing how far agents can go in manipulating an activist because the activist will constantly make excuses for the agent who regularly declares their dedication to the cause. Even if they do, occasionally, suspect the agent, they will pull the wool over their own eyes by rationalizing: "they did that unconsciously... they didn't really mean it... I can help them by being forgiving and accepting " and so on and so forth.

The agent will tell the activist:

"You're a leader!"

This is designed to enhance the activist's self-esteem. His or her narcissistic admiration of his/her own activist/altruistic intentions increase as he or she identifies with and consciously admires the altruistic declarations of the agent which are deliberately set up to mirror those of the activist.

This is "malignant pseudoidentification." It is the process by which the agent consciously imitates or simulates a certain behavior to foster the activist's identification with him/her, thus increasing the activist's vulnerability to exploitation. The agent will simulate the more subtle self-concepts of the activist.

Activists and those who have altruistic self-concepts are most vulnerable to malignant pseudoidentification especially during work with the agent when the interaction includes matter relating to their competency, autonomy, or knowledge.

The goal of the agent is to increase the activist's general empathy for the agent through pseudo-identification with the activist's self-concepts.

The most common example of this is the agent who will compliment the activist for his competency or knowledge or value to the movement. On a more subtle level, the agent will simulate affects and mannerisms of the activist which promotes identification via mirroring and feelings of "twinship". It is not unheard of for activists, enamored by the perceived helpfulness and competence of a good agent, to find themselves considering ethical violations and perhaps, even illegal behavior, in the service of their agent/handler.

The activist's "felt quality of perfection" [self-concept] is enhanced, and a strong empathic bond is developed with the agent through his/her imitation and simulation of the victim's own narcissistic investments. [self-concepts] That is, if the activist knows, deep inside, their own dedication to the cause, they will project that onto the agent who is "mirroring" them.

The activist will be deluded into thinking that the agent shares this feeling of identification and bonding. In an activist/social movement setting, the adversarial roles that activists naturally play vis a vis the establishment/government, fosters ongoing processes of intrapsychic splitting so that "twinship alliances" between activist and agent may render whole sectors or reality testing unavailable to the activist. They literally "lose touch with reality."

Activists who deny their own narcissistic investments [do not have a good idea of their own self-concepts and that they ARE concepts] and consciously perceive themselves (accurately, as it were) to be "helpers" endowed with a special amount of altruism are exceedingly vulnerable to the affective (emotional) simulation of the accomplished agent.

Empathy is fostered in the activist through the expression of quite visible affects. The presentation of tearfulness, sadness, longing, fear, remorse, and guilt, may induce in the helper-oriented activist a strong sense of compassion, while unconsciously enhancing the activist's narcissistic investment in self as the embodiment of goodness.

The agent's expresssion of such simulated affects may be quite compelling to the observer and difficult to distinguish from deep emotion.

It can usually be identified by two events, however:

First, the activist who has analyzed his/her own narcissistic roots and is aware of his/her own potential for being "emotionally hooked," will be able to remain cool and unaffected by such emotional outpourings by the agent.

As a result of this unaffected, cool, attitude, the Second event will occur: The agent will recompensate much too quickly following such an affective expression leaving the activist with the impression that "the play has ended, the curtain has fallen," and the imposture, for the moment, has finished. The agent will then move quickly to another activist/victim.

The fact is, the movement doesn't need leaders, it needs MOVERS. "Follow the leader" is a waste of time.

A good agent will want to meet as often as possible. He or she will talk a lot and say little. One can expect an onslaught of long, unresolved discussions.

Some agents take on a pushy, arrogant, or defensive manner:

1) To disrupt the agenda
2) To side-track the discussion
3) To interrupt repeatedly
4) To feign ignorance
5) To make an unfounded accusation against a person.

Calling someone a racist, for example. This tactic is used to discredit a person in the eyes of all other group members.

Saboteurs

Some saboteurs pretend to be activists. She or he will ....

1) Write encyclopedic flyers (in the present day, websites)
2) Print flyers in English only.
3) Have demonstrations in places where no one cares.
4) Solicit funding from rich people instead of grass roots support
5) Display banners with too many words that are confusing.
6) Confuse issues.
7) Make the wrong demands.
Cool Compromise the goal.
9) Have endless discussions that waste everyone's time. The agent may accompany the endless discussions with drinking, pot smoking or other amusement to slow down the activist's work.

Provocateurs

1) Want to establish "leaders" to set them up for a fall in order to stop the movement.
2) Suggest doing foolish, illegal things to get the activists in trouble.
3) Encourage militancy.
4) Want to taunt the authorities.
5) Attempt to make the activist compromise their values.
6) Attempt to instigate violence. Activisim ought to always be non-violent.
7) Attempt to provoke revolt among people who are ill-prepared to deal with the reaction of the authorities to such violence.

Informants

1) Want everyone to sign up and sing in and sign everything.
2) Ask a lot of questions (gathering data).
3) Want to know what events the activist is planning to attend.
4) Attempt to make the activist defend him or herself to identify his or her beliefs, goals, and level of committment.

Recruiting

Legitimate activists do not subject people to hours of persuasive dialog. Their actions, beliefs, and goals speak for themselves.

Groups that DO recruit are missionaries, military, and fake political parties or movements set up by agents.

Surveillance

ALWAYS assume that you are under surveillance.

At this point, if you are NOT under surveillance, you are not a very good activist!

Scare Tactics

They use them.

Such tactics include slander, defamation, threats, getting close to disaffected or minimally committed fellow activists to persuade them (via psychological tactics described above) to turn against the movement and give false testimony against their former compatriots. They will plant illegal substances on the activist and set up an arrest; they will plant false information and set up "exposure," they will send incriminating letters [emails] in the name of the activist; and more; they will do whatever society will allow.

This booklet in no way covers all the ways agents use to sabotage the lives of sincere an dedicated activists.

If an agent is "exposed," he or she will be transferred or replaced.

COINTELPRO is still in operation today under a different code name. It is no longer placed on paper where it can be discovered through the freedom of information act.

The FBI counterintelligence program's stated purpose: To expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, and otherwise neutralize individuals who the FBI categorize as opposed to the National Interests. "National Security" means the FBI's security from the people ever finding out the vicious things it does in violation of people's civil liberties.

______________________________________________________________________________________


JFK50: Eight Traits of the Disinformationalist





Eight Traits of the Disinformationalist


1) Avoidance. They never actually discuss issues head-on or provide constructive input, generally avoiding citation of references or credentials. Rather, they merely imply this, that, and the other. Virtually everything about their presentation implies their authority and expert knowledge in the matter without any further justification for credibility.

2) Selectivity. They tend to pick and choose opponents carefully, either applying the hit-and-run approach against mere commentators supportive of opponents, or focusing heavier attacks on key opponents who are known to directly address issues. Should a commentator become argumentative with any success, the focus will shift to include the commentator as well.

3) Coincidental. They tend to surface suddenly and somewhat coincidentally with a new controversial topic with no clear prior record of participation in general discussions in the particular public arena involved. They likewise tend to vanish once the topic is no longer of general concern. They were likely directed or elected to be there for a reason, and vanish with the reason.

4) Teamwork. They tend to operate in self-congratulatory and complementary packs or teams. Of course, this can happen naturally in any public forum, but there will likely be an ongoing pattern of frequent exchanges of this sort where professionals are involved. Sometimes one of the players will infiltrate the opponent camp to become a source for straw man or other tactics designed to dilute opponent presentation strength.

5) Anti-conspiratorial. They almost always have disdain for 'conspiracy theorists' and, usually, for those who in any way believe JFK was not killed by LHO. Ask yourself why, if they hold such disdain for conspiracy theorists, do they focus on defending a single topic discussed in a NG focusing on conspiracies? One might think they would either be trying to make fools of everyone on every topic, or simply ignore the group they hold in such disdain.Or, one might more rightly conclude they have an ulterior motive for their actions in going out of their way to focus as they do.

6) Artificial Emotions. An odd kind of 'artificial' emotionalism and an unusually thick skin -- an ability to persevere and persist even in the face of overwhelming criticism and unacceptance. This likely stems from intelligence community training that, no matter how condemning the evidence, deny everything, and never become emotionally involved or reactive. The net result for a disinfo artist is that emotions can seem artificial.

Most people, if responding in anger, for instance, will express their animosity throughout their rebuttal. But disinfo types usually have trouble maintaining the 'image' and are hot and cold with respect to pretended emotions and their usually more calm or unemotional communications style. It's just a job, and they often seem unable to 'act their role in character' as well in a communications medium as they might be able in a real face-to-face conversation/confrontation. You might have outright rage and indignation one moment, ho-hum the next, and more anger later -- an emotional yo-yo.

With respect to being thick-skinned, no amount of criticism will deter them from doing their job, and they will generally continue their old disinfo patterns without any adjustments to criticisms of how obvious it is that they play that game -- where a more rational individual who truly cares what others think might seek to improve their communications style, substance, and so forth, or simply give up.

7) Inconsistent. There is also a tendency to make mistakes which betray their true self/motives. This may stem from not really knowing their topic, or it may be somewhat 'freudian', so to speak, in that perhaps they really root for the side of truth deep within.

I have noted that often, they will simply cite contradictory information which neutralizes itself and the author. For instance, one such player claimed to be a Navy pilot, but blamed his poor communicating skills (spelling, grammar, incoherent style) on having only a grade-school education. I'm not aware of too many Navy pilots who don't have a college degree. Another claimed no knowledge of a particular topic/situation but later claimed first-hand knowledge of it.

8) Time Constant. Recently discovered, with respect to News Groups, is the response time factor. There are three ways this can be seen to work, especially when the government or other empowered player is involved in a cover up operation:

a) ANY NG posting by a targeted proponent for truth can result in an IMMEDIATE response. The government and other empowered players can afford to pay people to sit there and watch for an opportunity to do some damage. SINCE DISINFO IN A NG ONLY WORKS IF THE READER SEES IT - FAST RESPONSE IS CALLED FOR, or the visitor may be swayed towards truth.

b) When dealing in more direct ways with a disinformationalist, such as email, DELAY IS CALLED FOR - there will usually be a minimum of a 48-72 hour delay. This allows a sit-down team discussion on response strategy for best effect, and even enough time to 'get permission' or instruction from a formal chain of command.

c) In the NG example 1) above, it will often ALSO be seen that bigger guns are drawn and fired after the same 48-72 hours delay - the team approach in play. This is especially true when the targeted truth seeker or their comments are considered more important with respect to potential to reveal truth. Thus, a serious truth sayer will be attacked twice for the same sin.

______________________________________________________________________________________

JFK50: Twenty-Five Rules of Disinformation




Note: The first rule and last five (or six, depending on situation) rules are generally not directly within the ability of the traditional disinfo artist to apply. These rules are generally used more directly by those at the leadership, key players, or planning level of the criminal conspiracy or conspiracy to cover up.

1. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. Regardless of what you know, don't discuss it -- especially if you are a public figure, news anchor, etc. If it's not reported, it didn't happen, and you never have to deal with the issues.

2. Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the 'How dare you!' gambit.

3. Create rumor mongers. Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method which works especially well with a silent press, because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such 'arguable rumors'. If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a 'wild rumor' from a 'bunch of kids on the Internet' which can have no basis in fact.

4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent's argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.

5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary 'attack the messenger' ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as 'kooks', 'right-wing', 'liberal', 'left-wing', 'terrorists', 'conspiracy buffs', 'radicals', 'militia', 'racists', 'religious fanatics', 'sexual deviates', and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.

6. Hit and Run. In any public forum, make a brief attack of your opponent or the opponent position and then scamper off before an answer can be fielded, or simply ignore any answer. This works extremely well in Internet and letters-to-the-editor environments where a steady stream of new identities can be called upon without having to explain criticism, reasoning -- simply make an accusation or other attack, never discussing issues, and never answering any subsequent response, for that would dignify the opponent's viewpoint.

7. Question motives. Twist or amplify any fact which could be taken to imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive.

8. Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority and present your argument with enough 'jargon' and 'minutia' to illustrate you are 'one who knows', and simply say it isn't so without discussing issues or demonstrating concretely why or citing sources.

9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues except with denials they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.

10. Associate opponent charges with old news. A derivative of the straw man -- usually, in any large-scale matter of high visibility, someone will make charges early on which can be or were already easily dealt with - a kind of investment for the future should the matter not be so easily contained.) Where it can be foreseen, have your own side raise a straw man issue and have it dealt with early on as part of the initial contingency plans. Subsequent charges, regardless of validity or new ground uncovered, can usually then be associated with the original charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without need to address current issues -- so much the better where the opponent is or was involved with the original source.

11. Establish and rely upon fall-back positions. Using a minor matter or element of the facts, take the 'high road' and 'confess' with candor that some innocent mistake, in hindsight, was made -- but that opponents have seized on the opportunity to blow it all out of proportion and imply greater criminalities which, 'just isn't so.' Others can reinforce this on your behalf, later, and even publicly 'call for an end to the nonsense' because you have already 'done the right thing.' Done properly, this can garner sympathy and respect for 'coming clean' and 'owning up' to your mistakes without addressing more serious issues.

12. Enigmas have no solution. Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to lose interest more quickly without having to address the actual issues.

13. Alice in Wonderland Logic. Avoid discussion of the issues by reasoning backwards or with an apparent deductive logic which forbears any actual material fact.

14. Demand complete solutions. Avoid the issues by requiring opponents to solve the crime at hand completely, a ploy which works best with issues qualifying for rule 10.

15. Fit the facts to alternate conclusions. This requires creative thinking unless the crime was planned with contingency conclusions in place.

16. Vanish evidence and witnesses. If it does not exist, it is not fact, and you won't have to address the issue.

17. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can 'argue' with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.

18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can't do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how 'sensitive they are to criticism.'

19. Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the 'play dumb' rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder weapon.) In order to completely avoid discussing issues, it may be required that you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance.

20. False evidence. Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations -- as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications.

21. Call a Grand Jury, Special Prosecutor, or other empowered investigative body. Subvert the (process) to your benefit and effectively neutralize all sensitive issues without open discussion. Once convened, the evidence and testimony are required to be secret when properly handled. For instance, if you own the prosecuting attorney, it can insure a Grand Jury hears no useful evidence and that the evidence is sealed and unavailable to subsequent investigators. Once a favorable verdict is achieved, the matter can be considered officially closed. Usually, this technique is applied to find the guilty innocent, but it can also be used to obtain charges when seeking to frame a victim.

22. Manufacture a new truth. Create your own expert(s), group(s), author(s), leader(s) or influence existing ones willing to forge new ground via scientific, investigative, or social research or testimony which concludes favorably. In this way, if you must actually address issues, you can do so authoritatively.

23. Create bigger distractions. If the above does not seem to be working to distract from sensitive issues, or to prevent unwanted media coverage of unstoppable events such as trials, create bigger news stories (or treat them as such) to distract the multitudes.

24. Silence critics. If the above methods do not prevail, consider removing opponents from circulation by some definitive solution so that the need to address issues is removed entirely. This can be by their death, arrest and detention, blackmail or destruction of their character by release of blackmail information, or merely by destroying them financially, emotionally, or severely damaging their health.

25. Vanish. If you are a key holder of secrets or otherwise overly illuminated and you think the heat is getting too hot, to avoid the issues, vacate the kitchen.
______________________________________________________________________________________

JFK50: COINTELPRO Techniques for Dilution, Misdirection and Control of a Internet Forum




COINTELPRO Techniques for dilution, misdirection and control of a internet forum..

There are several techniques for the control and manipulation of a internet forum no matter what, or who is on it. We will go over each technique and demonstrate that only a minimal number of operatives can be used to eventually and effectively gain a control of a 'uncontrolled forum.'

Technique #1 - 'FORUM SLIDING'

If a very sensitive posting of a critical nature has been posted on a forum - it can be quickly removed from public view by 'forum sliding.' In this technique a number of unrelated posts are quietly prepositioned on the forum and allowed to 'age.' Each of these misdirectional forum postings can then be called upon at will to trigger a 'forum slide.' The second requirement is that several fake accounts exist, which can be called upon, to ensure that this technique is not exposed to the public. To trigger a 'forum slide' and 'flush' the critical post out of public view it is simply a matter of logging into each account both real and fake and then 'replying' to prepositined postings with a simple 1 or 2 line comment. This brings the unrelated postings to the top of the forum list, and the critical posting 'slides' down the front page, and quickly out of public view. Although it is difficult or impossible to censor the posting it is now lost in a sea of unrelated and unuseful postings. By this means it becomes effective to keep the readers of the forum reading unrelated and non-issue items.

Technique #2 - 'CONSENSUS CRACKING'

A second highly effective technique (which you can see in operation all the time atwww.abovetopsecret.com) is 'consensus cracking.' To develop a consensus crack, the following technique is used. Under the guise of a fake account a posting is made which looks legitimate and is towards the truth is made - but the critical point is that it has a VERY WEAK PREMISE without substantive proof to back the posting. Once this is done then under alternative fake accounts a very strong position in your favour is slowly introduced over the life of the posting. It is IMPERATIVE that both sides are initially presented, so the uninformed reader cannot determine which side is the truth. As postings and replies are made the stronger 'evidence' or disinformation in your favour is slowly 'seeded in.' Thus the uninformed reader will most like develop the same position as you, and if their position is against you their opposition to your posting will be most likely dropped. However in some cases where the forum members are highly educated and can counter your disinformation with real facts and linked postings, you can then 'abort' the consensus cracking by initiating a 'forum slide.'

Technique #3 - 'TOPIC DILUTION'

Topic dilution is not only effective in forum sliding it is also very useful in keeping the forum readers on unrelated and non-productive issues. This is a critical and useful technique to cause a 'RESOURCE BURN.' By implementing continual and non-related postings that distract and disrupt (trolling ) the forum readers they are more effectively stopped from anything of any real productivity. If the intensity of gradual dilution is intense enough, the readers will effectively stop researching and simply slip into a 'gossip mode.' In this state they can be more easily misdirected away from facts towards uninformed conjecture and opinion. The less informed they are the more effective and easy it becomes to control the entire group in the direction that you would desire the group to go in. It must be stressed that a proper assessment of the psychological capabilities and levels of education is first determined of the group to determine at what level to 'drive in the wedge.' By being too far off topic too quickly it may trigger censorship by a forum moderator.

Technique #4 - 'INFORMATION COLLECTION'

Information collection is also a very effective method to determine the psychological level of the forum members, and to gather intelligence that can be used against them. In this technique in a light and positive environment a 'show you mine so me yours' posting is initiated. From the number of replies and the answers that are provided much statistical information can be gathered. An example is to post your 'favourite weapon' and then encourage other members of the forum to showcase what they have. In this matter it can be determined by reverse proration what percentage of the forum community owns a firearm, and or a illegal weapon. This same method can be used by posing as one of the form members and posting your favourite 'technique of operation.' From the replies various methods that the group utilizes can be studied and effective methods developed to stop them from their activities.

Technique #5 - 'ANGER TROLLING'

Statistically, there is always a percentage of the forum posters who are more inclined to violence. In order to determine who these individuals are, it is a requirement to present a image to the forum to deliberately incite a strong psychological reaction. From this the most violent in the group can be effectively singled out for reverse IP location and possibly local enforcement tracking. To accomplish this only requires posting a link to a video depicting a local police officer massively abusing his power against a very innocent individual. Statistically of the million or so police officers in America there is always one or two being caught abusing there powers and the taping of the activity can be then used for intelligence gathering purposes - without the requirement to 'stage' a fake abuse video. This method is extremely effective, and the more so the more abusive the video can be made to look. Sometimes it is useful to 'lead' the forum by replying to your own posting with your own statement of violent intent, and that you 'do not care what the authorities think!!' inflammation. By doing this and showing no fear it may be more effective in getting the more silent and self-disciplined violent intent members of the forum to slip and post their real intentions. This can be used later in a court of law during prosecution.

Technique #6 - 'GAINING FULL CONTROL'

It is important to also be harvesting and continually maneuvering for a forum moderator position. Once this position is obtained, the forum can then be effectively and quietly controlled by deleting unfavourable postings - and one can eventually steer the forum into complete failure and lack of interest by the general public. This is the 'ultimate victory' as the forum is no longer participated with by the general public and no longer useful in maintaining their freedoms. Depending on the level of control you can obtain, you can deliberately steer a forum into defeat by censoring postings, deleting memberships, flooding, and or accidentally taking the forum offline. By this method the forum can be quickly killed. However it is not always in the interest to kill a forum as it can be converted into a 'honey pot' gathering center to collect and misdirect newcomers and from this point be completely used for your control for your agenda purposes.

CONCLUSION

Remember these techniques are only effective if the forum participants DO NOT KNOW ABOUT THEM. Once they are aware of these techniques the operation can completely fail, and the forum can become uncontrolled. At this point other avenues must be considered such as initiating a false legal precidence to simply have the forum shut down and taken offline. This is not desirable as it then leaves the enforcement agencies unable to track the percentage of those in the population who always resist attempts for control against them. Many other techniques can be utilized and developed by the individual and as you develop further techniques of infiltration and control it is imperative to share then with HQ.
___________________________________________________________________

JFK50: Bush



I do know this man DeMohrenschildt. 
I first men him in the early 40’3. 
He was an uncle to my Andover roommate. Later he surfaced in Dallas (50’s maybe) . . . Then he surfaced when Oswald shot to prominence. 
He knew Oswald before the assassination of Pres. Kennedy. 
I don’t recall his role in all this.

Director of Central Intelligence, 
George H.W.Bush, 
1976



To:

Director
Bureau of Intelligence and Research
Department of State

[We have been] advised that the Department of State feels some misguided anti-Castro group might capitalize on the present situation and undertake an unauthorized raid against Cuba, believing that the assassination of President John F. Kennedy might herald a change in U.S. policy… 

[Our] sources know of no [such] plans…  

The substance of the foregoing information was orally furnished to Mr. George Bush of the Central Intelligence Agency and Captain William Edwards of the Defense Intelligence Agency.

 FBI Director J.Edgar Hoover,
November 29, 1963



DATE: November 22, 1963]

At 1:45 p.m. Mr. GEORGE H.W. BUSH, President of the Zapata Off-shore Drilling Company, Houston, Texas, residence 5525 Briar, Houston, telephonically furnished the following information to writer by long distance telephone call from Tyler, Texas.

BUSH stated that he wanted to be kept confidential but wanted to furnish hearsay that he recalled hearing in recent weeks, the day and source unknown. He stated that one JAMES PARROTT has been talking of killing the president when he comes to Houston.

BUSH stated that PARROTT is possibly a student at the University of Houston and is active in political matters in this area. He stated that he felt MRS FAWLEY, telephone number SU 2-5239, or ARLENE SMITH, telephone number JA 9-9194 of the Harris County Republican Headquarters would be able to furnish additional information regarding the identity of PARROTT.

BUSH stated that he was proceeding to Dallas, Texas, would remain in the Sheraton-Dallas Hotel and return to his residence on 11-23-63. His office telephone Number is CA 2-0395.

FBI Special Agent Graham W. Kitchel,
November 22nd 1963




Through Mr. Gale Allen . . . I learned that Mr. George Bush, DCI designate has prior knowledge of the now terminated project WUBRINY/LPDICTUM which was involved in proprietary commercial operations in Europe. 

He became aware of this project through Mr. Thomas J. Devine, a former CIA Staff Employee and later, oil-wildcatting associate with Mr. Bush. 

Their joint activities culminated in the establishment of Zapata Oil [in 1953] which they eventually sold. After the sale of Zapata Oil, Mr. Bush went into politics, and Mr. Devine became a member of the investment firm of Train, Cabot and Associates, New York . . . 

The attached memorandum describes the close relationship between Messrs. Devine and Bush in 1967-1968 which, according to Mr. Allen, continued while Mr. Bush was our ambassador to the United Nations.







Mr. A










My name's Steve Ditkovich, and I'm not bitter...