Mid-September 2000: Bin Laden Message Gives Hint of Upcoming USS Cole Attack
"A videotape message featuring bin Laden calling for more attacks on the US is aired on Al Jazeera. The video ends with al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri [MI6] saying, “Enough of words, it is time to take action against this iniquitous and faithless force [the United States], which has spread troops through Egypt, Yemen and Saudi Arabia.” "
[CNN, 10/20/2000; WASHINGTON TIMES, 8/26/2002]
" Further, bin Laden is wearing a distinctive, curved Yemeni dagger. Lawrence Wright will later mention in the book The Looming Tower that this was a “teasing clue” similar to other clues he had left before other attacks. "
[WRIGHT, 2006, PP. 318]
" DIA analyst Kie Fallis later recalls, “Every time he put out one of these videotapes, it was a signal that action was coming.” He claims that after hearing of the video, he “knew then it would be within a month or two.” But nonetheless, his suggestion to put out a general attack warning will go unheeded (see May 2000-Late September 2000).
An al-Qaeda attack on the USS Cole follows less than a month later (see October 12, 2000). "
[WASHINGTON TIMES, 8/26/2002]
FDR meets with King Ibn Saud, of Saudi Arabia, on board USS Quincy (CA-71) in the Great Bitter Lake, Egypt, on 14 February 1945.
The King is speaking to the interpreter, Colonel William A. Eddy, USMC. Fleet Admiral William D. Leahy, USN, the President's Aide and Chief of Staff, is at left.
Note ornate carpet on the ship's deck, and life raft mounted on the side of the 5"/38 twin gun mount in the background.
"With momentum building in the United States for disclosure of the 28 suppressed pages of the Congressional Joint Inquiry into the 9/11 terrorist attacks, concerning the relationship of the Saudi royal family to those crimes, Charles cannot escape attention to his Saudi connections: Not only did Prince Bandar bin Sultan, Saudi Ambassador to the USA in 2001 and undoubtedly a subject of the 28 pages,
The 28 pages relate to matters sensitive and likely to damage the national security in key U.S./NATO-allied countries, plural, in planning and facilitating the events that comprise the Popular Myth of 9/11, most substantially and most damagingly, the Zionist State of Israel, another vital global security partner to the criminal House of Saud in their project to export Wahabi Revolution and mayhem to every corner of the globe in the service of extending their own, private short-term threats to their stolen class privilage by just more last generation - if still they can.
pour tens of millions of dollars into Charles’s private “charities” and the Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies (known as “Charles’s OCIS,” because of his active patronage), but Charles himself negotiated mega-deals within the Anglo-Saudi arms trade.[1] Bandar’s brother-in-law Prince Turki bin Faisal, who resigned as director of Saudi General Intelligence 10 days before 9/11, is a member of the OCIS Board of Trustees and chairs its Strategy Advisory Committee.
Bin Faisal and numerous of his fellow Saudi princelings were also educated in the most prestigious and elite private prep schools and colleges of the Eastern Establishment that supply the main student intake into the Ivy League schools and their multitude of secret private postgraduate fraternities.
According to the testimony of Kay Griggs, ex-wife to U.S.M.C Col. George Griggs, Head of Special Operations under Admiral Frank Kelso, former Secretary of the Navy, these Saudi Princilings, inexperienced and naive in the ways of alcohol, narcotics and homoeroticism were systematically groomed and Targetted for recruitment at these prep schools and colleges by the same homoerotic cabals as dominate all the Ivy League fraternities from Skull & Bones on down.
Working on the assumption that there is no secret and no bond like a homosexual secret, except for an Arab homosexual secret to secure loyalty on the part of the Saudi princes to the Eastern Establishment's homosexual fraternal cabal.
Prince Turki bin Fasial was specifically mentioned by Griggs in her 1998 video deposition as the target and victim for such abuse by the circle around Kissinger, Haig, Vance, and members of the Great Houses such as Rockefeller and Bundy.
The pair were among only eight foreign royals whom Charles invited to his wedding to Camilla Parker-Bowles in 2005. Both are named in the 4,000-page lawsuit filed on Feb. 4 in New York by the families of 9/11 victims. [See article in National—ed.]
The pair were among only eight foreign royals whom Charles invited to his wedding to Camilla Parker-Bowles in 2005. Both are named in the 4,000-page lawsuit filed on Feb. 4 in New York by the families of 9/11 victims. [See article in National—ed.]
Already in 2005, a book co-authored by British former prisoner of the Saudi regime Sandy Mitchell pointed out that “Prince Charles’s relationships with prominent House of Saud members have created serious problems and obstacles to UK agencies investigating claims of Saudi financing of international terrorism, according to Special Branch sources,” citing how lawyers for 9/11 families encountered such a stone wall on a visit to the UK in 2003.[2]
Outrage at the Windsor-Saud connection is now spreading. Human rights activist Joan Smith, for example, blasted Charles in a Jan. 25 column in The Independent, for “sucking up to the Saudis.” She cited the role of “Saudi Arabia, with its two-faced royal family,” in “the 9/11 attacks, Madrid, the 7/7 bombings, the kidnapping of the Chibok girls [and] the massacre at Charlie Hebdo.”
Charles is feeling the heat. A new biography of the Prince of Wales claims that he “no longer wants to promote UK arms sales in Gulf States,” according to the BBC on Feb. 4.[3]
And with Charles visiting the Persian Gulf, including Saudi Arabia, yet again on Feb. 6-12, Clarence House (his residence) issued a defensive-sounding statement that “the Prince of Wales’s return to the region only one year after his last tour demonstrates the importance that Her Majesty’s Government places on its association with key partners in the area. These connections are underpinned by the long-standing and respectful relationships which exist between the Royal Family and the ruling families in the Gulf.”
The BBC reported that a spokesman followed up with a pre-emptive denial of new arms deals, saying: “The Prince of Wales’ upcoming visit to the Middle East is not about sales of defence equipment.”
No comments:
Post a Comment