Monday, 29 July 2013

Freikorps




After the First World War former senior officers in the German Army began raising private armies called Freikorps. These were used to defend the German borders against the possibility of invasion from the Red Army. Later they were used against attempts at revolution in Germany.

General Franz Epp led 30,000 soldiers to crush the Bavarian Socialist Republic in March, 1919. It is estimated that Epp's men killed over 600 communists and socialists over the next few weeks.

Herman Ehrhardt, a former naval commander and Wolfgang Kapp, a right-wing journalist, led a group of soldiers to take control of Berlin in March 1920. The Kapp Putsch was defeated by a general strike of trade unionists and Kapp was forced to flee to Sweden.

The Freikorps were dissolved in 1921 and later many of them joined Sturm Abteilung (Storm Section), the private army of Adolf Hitler.








The first segment describes the assassination program which eliminated the democratic leadership of Weimar Germany paving the way for Hitler's rise to power. The second details the formation of the Nazi Party as a front for German military intelligence.












5 comments:

  1. Glad to see you have Jones included.
    What about Icke?
    What about the rest of the false opposition?
    They are nearly done with the Arab world in their Ordo ab Chao. Things have begun in South America. Eurpoe and the US are imminent and the Freikorps have been hard at work bringing you Blavatsky-esque pseudo religion and the "opposition" which is their own final "solution" to the problems they are creating. The NWO is on its way, and they want it to be YOU, dear truther and conspiracy theorist.
    Love to all.
    The future is where we take it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Icke does not advocate armed, suicidal sedition.

      Icke advocates spiritual inner reflection.

      That's not what a Freikorps is.

      A Freikorps is a private army of veterans and "patriots" used conduct mass political assassinations and suppression of leftists and trade unionists on behalf of the Ruling Class in the interests of capital and property,

      The common theme with these people is 1) Guns 2) Property.

      The so-called Founding Fathers convened articles of Confederation and held a Consitutional Convention to draft a Federalist Consitution to protect private property from the "levelling impulses" of democracy and minimise the risk to their interests posed by "faction", by which they meant "class".

      And when they referred to "property", that definition also included within it "people".

      Delete
    2. I don't for one second believe that Icke IS false opposition - he gets frequently smeared and ridiculed by reference to the Lizard thing, but that's peripheral and not primary to his core thesis;

      He has laterly refined his position since The Biggest Secret to something that does appear to be true - there does appear to be a totally irrational pull by genetically inbred, recessive royal and aristocratic dynasties towards the constant, mass abuse (in a ritualised fashion) of young children; it is an irrepressible magnetic draw.

      Now, what Icke attributes this to, and it makes sense, is some kind of extra dimensional entities on a higher or lower dimensional plane akin to inhabiting demons, which gain sustainence in some way from the energies produced by childhood sexual trauma.

      These beings are able to access this resource by using these inbred toffs (for whose genes, they have the best affinity) as sock puppets or actuators to cause the abuse in our perceptual space to Harvest the release of energies into their own plane - when they use these people, they present an extra sensory pressence of a reptilian form around the person, beyond the normal 5 sense conscious sense perception - but it is no longer his position that these people ARE 8 foot lizards or genuinely do shapeshift, in spite of the perceptual shifts within their victims.

      This makes some sense, but is somewhat untestable.

      Delete
  2. It's my further conjecture, and I've received encouraging expressions of reinforcement on this one from people from a variety of backgrounds is that this may likely be the concrete-specific reason for launching the phoney War of Terror Paradigm and War of Civilisations bullshit specifically directed toward Islam.

    Of all the three main Abrahamic religions, Islam is the only one with a practical and matter of fact stance on Demonology.

    Jesus taught ALL his apostles how to cast out inhabiting demons and they all went out and did it prodigiously.

    Now, in Christendom, aside from crazy televangelists, the only branch of the Church that performs exorcisms is the Roman Church; these rites are ONLY accessible via the Clergy, only very specific priests, given special dispensation and granted explicit permission.

    Islam has no clergy, as such - only "Schollars"

    The exorcism rite, (I believe) is quoted verbatim in the Qu'ran and anyone of faith can do it.

    Catholics are (characteristically) warned that their own soul is forfeit if their faith is imperfect, which scares the shit out of most people, including priests.

    If these things exist, and it seems that they may indeed do, Islam represents an existential threat to them in that sense.

    Because Muslims still believe in God.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I see no real objection to the deployment of a Freikorps in the United States, provided they don't engage in assasinations or murders. Enforcing order and serving as a deterrent are very different from killing dissent.

    The Oath Keeper Freikorps' charter is centered around the Oath of Office of various military and civil law enforcement professions. (Please see this: http://www.sheriffs.org/sites/default/files/uploads/Legal%20Meaning%20of%20Oath%20of%20Office.pdf).

    Part of the Oath of state employees and soldiers is to "uphold the Constitution", and though there is evil in every organization, it would be ironic for a Freikorps founded on the creed of their own Oath of Office to do something that violates that office.

    Remember, the main pool from which the OK Freikorps draws from is county police sheriffs. A sheriff is one of the most local servants of the public and, consequently, the most accountable. The OK Freikorps' mission statement is to follow, in an originalist sense, the Constitution that they took an oath to defend, hence the Freikorps' name. They are a group of sheriffs and others who refuse to follow the increasingly leftist orders of the federal government and, as such, will rebel if pushed to do something they interpret as in violation of their Oath of Office.

    The entire point of the OK Freikorps is not to overthrow the government or assasinate leaders. It's to provide a network of rightist resistance to the perceived, ever-growing onslaught of leftism and defiance of an Originalist interpretation of the Constitution of the United States.

    Remember, "the law is the will of he whom the sheriff obeys"...

    ReplyDelete