VERY Important story: InfoWars has a "former" Stratfor/CIA-front staffer employed as a "researcher".
Confirmed, proven, documented. And officially denied by AJ, who disavows all knowledge.
Alex Jones is a conduit for disinformation from the US intelligence community, furthering the causes of the military industrial complex and global arms manufacturers by mobilising ordinary people to fight against their own interest to further their corporate bottom line.
AJ may have always been an intelligence asset, he may have been corrupted, compromised or blackmailed or he may just be a useful idiot whose right-wing biases make him laughably gullible and exploitable.
I've been saying this forever: huge elements of his far-right ranting are blatantly and verifiably untrue, in particular all the bullshit about the UN Small Arms Treaty being a threat to the Second Ammedment and private gun ownership which is, if you have ever read the US Constitution or know anything about the UN or how International multilateral treaties work or where they apply - they do not over-ride domestic laws or the Constituions signatory nations.
The UN Small Arms Treaty has no impact whatsoever on personal or individual rights to gun ownership and makes absolutely no reference to them, even if it had the power to enforce any changes, which it doesn't.
It DOES threaten corporations who's share price and annual turnover is largely dependent on the manufacture, sale and export of guns, ammo and other weapons systems to (exact quote from the treaty) "known human rights abusers".
The UN Treaty merely suggests, in plain language, that this is not a good thing and recommends that national governments work together to try to stop it happening so much in future.
Since before Theatre 8 in Aurora, AJ and InforWars have been aggressively astroturfing for the other side of the arguement.
http://hatrickpenry.wordpress.com/2012/12/08/a-case-study-in-disinformation-infowars-responds-to-molly-gate/
Also: Alex's chief sponsor, by the way, is Natural News.
Natural News is owned by "Former" Army/CIA Head of Psychological Warfare (and author of "The Mind War") General Albert Stubblebine.
So, InfoWars is almost entirely funded, gets it's whole operating budget from a company owned by a CIA General who PERSONALLY crafted their entire modern (and current) PsyOps doctrine.
But Cesar is an honourable man. And it's unthinkable that AJ could EVER be corrupted, used or subject to undue influence as a result of that relationship. Don't be absurd.
Whereas, AJ is quite happy to freely and repeatedly assert that because President Obama spent much of his childhood growing up in the Philippines in an English Language school his mother emigrated to teach at, at a time when CIA were paying special attention to Suharto's military rule and their anti-Communist efforts, Barack HAS to be CIA. And a closet Communist.
Really. Seriously, that doesn't make a lick of sense.
A childhood CIA anti-communist agitator who grew up to be a committed revolutionary Marxist Muslim infiltrator running Jihadist Soviet cell inside the Oval Office...?
Because Marxism, Fascist Anti-Communism and Militant Islamism are all totally compatible and complementary political ideologies.
Just for the record, Alex, Thomas Jefferson wasn't a Natural Born US citizen when he was President, either; and he intervened and went to war in Libya without first informing Congress, either.
In fact, verifiably, the first 8 US Presidents, up to and including Martin Van Burren were none of them Natural Born US citizens; how could they possibly be? There was no United States in existence prior to 1776, and the Declaration of Independence certainly was not retroactive.
They were all Natural Born Subjects of the British Crown, so was everyone who lived there.
All of them (well, give or take).
That's actually not quite true, because prior to the passage of the Thirteenth Amendment, no one actually knew or could firmly define exactly who was and was not a US citizen; to this day, there is still no legal definition of what a "Natural Born" citizen might be, rendering the use of the term in Article 1 completely meaningless.
There was, however, general consensus prior to 1865 that *whatever* it meant to be a Natural Born Citizen of the United States, Barack Obama most certainly did not qualify.
You just had to take one look at him to know that.
Which remains the key crux of all this race-baiting hysteria to this day, unfortunately....
No comments:
Post a Comment