Tuesday 7 May 2013

GADDAFI WAS KILLED BY FRENCH SECRET SERVICEMAN ON ORDERS FROM NICOLAS SARKOZY, SCOURCES SENSATIONALLY CLAIM


GADDAFI WAS KILLED BY FRENCH SECRET SERVICEMAN ON ORDERS FROM NICOLAS SARKOZY, SCOURCES SENSATIONALLY CLAIM (VIDEO)
A French secret serviceman acting on the express orders of Nicolas Sarkozy is suspected of murdering Colonel Gaddafi, it was sensationally claimed today.

He is said to have infiltrated a violent mob mutilating the captured Libyan dictator last year and shot him in the head.
 
The motive, according to well-placed sources in the North African country, was to stop Gaddafi being interrogated about his highly suspicious links with Sarkozy, who was President of France at the time.




Nicolas Sarkozy, France's former president, allegedly ordered the murder of former Libyan dictator Colonel Gaddafi
 
Other former western leaders, including ex British Prime Minister Tony Blair, were also extremely close to Gaddafi, visiting him regularly and helping to facilitate multi-million pounds business deals.
 
Sarkozy, who once welcomed Gaddafi as a 'brother leader' during a state visit to Paris, was said to have received millions from the Libyan despot to fund his election campaign in 2007.
 
The conspiracy theory will be of huge concern to Britain which sent RAF jet to bomb Libya last year with the sole intention of 'saving civilian lives'.


A United Nations mandate which sanctioned the attack expressly stated that the western allies could not interfere in the internal politics of the country.
 
Instead the almost daily bombing runs ended with Gaddafi's overthrow, while both French and British military 'advisors' were said to have assisted on the ground.
 
Now Mahmoud Jibril, who served as interim Prime Minister following Gaddafi's overthrow, told Egyptian TV: 'It was a foreign agent who mixed with the revolutionary brigades to kill Gaddafi.'




Gaddafi was killed on October 20 in a final assault on his hometown Sirte by fighters of the new regime, who said they had cornered the ousted despot in a sewage pipe waving a golden gun. The moment was captured on video


Former Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, covered in blood, is pulled from a truck by NTC fighters in Sirte before he was killed


Revolutionary Libyan fighters inspect a storm drain where Muammar Gaddafi was found wounded in Sirte, Libya, last year



Diplomatic sources in Tripoli, the Libyan capital, meanwhile suggested to the Italian newspaper Corriere della Serra that a foreign assassin was likely to have been French.
 
The paper writes: 'Since the beginning of NATO support for the revolution, strongly backed by the government of Nicolas Sarkozy, Gaddafi openly threatened to reveal details of his relationship with the former president of France, including the millions of dollars paid to finance his candidacy at the 2007 elections.'
 
One Tripoli source said: 'Sarkozy had every reason to try to silence the Colonel and as quickly as possible.'
 
The view is supported by information gathered by investigaters in Benghazi, Libya's second city and the place where the 'Arab Spring' revolution against Gaddafi started in early 2011.
 
Rami El Obeidi, the former head of foreign relations for the Libyan transitional council, said he knew that Gaddafi had been tracked through his satellite telecommunications system as he talked to Bashar Al-Assad, the Syrian dictator.
Nato experts were able to trace the communicatiosn traffic between the two Arab leaders, and so pinpoint Gaddafi to the city of Sirte, where he was murdered on October 20 2011.
 
Nato jets shot up Gaddafi's convoy, before rebels on the ground dragged Gaddafi from a drain where he was hiding and then subjected him to a violent attack which was videod.
 
In another sinister twist to the story, a 22-year-old who was among the group which attacked Gaddafi and who frequently brandished the gun said to have killed him, died in Paris last Monday.
 
Ben Omran Shaaban was said to have been beaten up himself by Gaddafi loyalists in July, before being shot twice.He was flown to France for treatment, but died of his injuries in hospital.
 
Sarkozy, who lost the presidential election in May, has continually denied receiving money from Gaddafi.
 
Today he was unavailable for comment, but is facing a number of enquiries into alleged financial irregularities.

The Tia Sharp Trial: Day 2






The last time anyone saw Tia Sharp was at mid-day on the tenth anniversary of the Soham Double-Event Murder - multiple witnesses, including the next door neighbour saw her leaving her grandmother's house, replying "Yeah, yeah, yeah" to Stuart Hazell's verbal request that she try to be back home for 6pm.

That next door neighbour is currently on bail, having been charged on suspicion of aiding an offender (with exculpatory evidence, presumably).

"A pathologist who examined the body, as well as the photograph, said marks on Tia's body suggested she had been moved after she died, and "posed" into the position seen in the photograph, Mr Edis said."

Why would he bring her back to the house after she was dead and take non-sexual pictures of her corpse on his bed solely for the purpose of fitting himself up with inciminating evidence?

"He told the jury: "The prosecution case is that Stuart Hazell had a sexual attraction for Tia Sharp, that there was some form of sexual assault, something of that kind, and that was the reason he killed her.""

"Some form of sexual assult"...? This all seems rather vague - can't you tell from the state of her body?

In that case, there should be DNA on her or in her - is there?

Of course there isn't.

"The court heard two memory cards were found in the house, one in the kitchen and one, hidden on top of a doorframe, which contained "extensive pornography" featuring young girls."

Who doesn't have ten times that much hidden all over the house?

"Mr Edis said internet history on Mr Hazell's phone showed searches of a website that was popular with paedophiles"

...according to the police, who siezed his computer and could have loaded anything they wanted onto it.

And again, how would they know? And why would that mean anything anyway if they're not specifically kiddie porn sites?

For instance, I may have pages in my history devoted to Landscape Gardening - and it may be the case (although I think it's rather unlikely...) that a disproportionate percentage of paedophiles are in the landscape gardening industry and visit the site for work or pleasure; you know, when they're NOT molesting children...

But that still doesn't mean anything sinister, since how could he be expected to be aware that a particular (totally legal) porn site may or may not be popular with paedophile if (as seems to be obvious), he is not, in fact, a paedophile himself.

I'm going to take a wild stab in the dark here and posit that the basis for that remark by the prosecution was some variation in the phrase "Hot, barely legal teen action" somewhere on or hidden in the code for that site and porn sites like it.

Which would be all of them.

Seriously, every single one.

"Mr Edis told the jury the loft had been inspected by police twice before Tia's body was found.

"They only found it, I am afraid, because it had started to smell," he said.

"It was quite well hidden. It has been moved up and then across within the loft space." "

Indeed. Because the police had already searched the house and the bins from top to bottom, as many as FOUR TIMES the preceeding Week, WITH sniffer dogs and hadn't found her up there. None of the neighbours noticed or complained of a smell, either, despite her decomposing corpse being left upstairs in the August heat for more than a week in the middle of a heatwave, wrapped only in taped up bin-liners.

This isn't rocket science. 

The Police didn't find her in the house and the dogs could smell her in the house because she wasn't in the house during the first four searches.

She wasn't there until the police put her there.

They moved the body, just as they had at Soham, to conceal the fact they have serial killer on the loose and about 5 completely innocent men serving time for it. 

Or worse still, a cult. Potentially a whole team of killers.








Sunday Times Article – ‘Satanic Abuse Claims Doomed Our Girl’



SRA is Real. And those who practice it most often wear the cloak of Christianity or the Bourgeoisie "respectable" Professions, such as law, medicine or chartered accountancy.

They KNOW it does not exist, because they are "experts".

Experts are only expert in the things they are taught, not in what they see.

And they (as I was) are taught "Satanic Ritual Abuse does not exist".

Well, it does exist, and they cannot therefore see it.

This is known as "doing bad science", to steal a phrase from that idiot hypocrite, Goldacre.

‘Satanic Abuse Claims Doomed Our Girl’



A family have described how their daughter’s life went into terminal decline after she was treated by psychiatrists and doctors who fostered false beliefs in her mind that she was the victim of satanic abuse.
Carole Myers was treated for 20 years by experts — including a former head of ethics
for the British Medical Association (BMA) — yet the family say her deluded claims went
unchallenged. She even alleged she had been abused at Conservative Central Office
by two former cabinet ministers.
Myers eventually died at 41 in mysterious circumstances. A report by a Scotland Yard
officer, Detective Sergeant Grant Lander, stated that he found it “quite incredible”
that the satanic abuse claims were taken at face value by experts when they were
demonstrably untrue.
Her case has alarming parallels with the satanic abuse cases of the late 1980s and
early 1990s in Cleveland, Orkney, Rochdale and Nottingham — where parents were
separated from their children on the basis of uncorroborated claims from selfprofessed
victims of ritual exploitation.



Sunday Times Article – ‘Satanic Abuse Claims Doomed Our Girl’



Daniel Foggo – Published: 12 June 2011.  Copyright ‘The Sunday Times‘, 2011.  If you wish to reproduce extracts from it please place the relevant copyright notice with it.   The article is a slightly edited version of the one printed in the first edition of ‘The Sunday Times’ for that day, and has some sentences removed which neither add to nor detract from the story.
Bear in mind when reading the article that no police investigations of the Felstead family ever took place, at any time; no court case ever took place, at any time; and that no series of attacks at the hands of Tory politicians, at Conservative Party Headquarters, ever took place, at any time. Nor was a childhood friend killed in front her, nor was her social worker murdered by an escaped lunatic. Carol’s delusions were unquestionably created by the therapy she received at the hands of callous, unprincipled doctors who projected their fantasies onto her for their own warped ends. It can now be proven without a shadow of a doubt that Carol was perfectly healthy, both physically and mentally, before she received medical treatment, and that the impossible fantasies imposed on her by her treating doctors while under the influence of massively powerful, mind-altering drugs, was nothing less than brainwashing. The end result of which was illness, depression, psychological disturbance, and early death. – Richard Felstead.
A woman whose death in 2005 remains a mystery had her wild beliefs of abuse
nurtured by her doctors, say her family
A family have described how their daughter’s life went into terminal decline after she was treated by psychiatrists and doctors who fostered false beliefs in her mind that she was the victim of satanic abuse.
Carole Myers was treated for 20 years by experts — including a former head of ethics
for the British Medical Association (BMA) — yet the family say her deluded claims went
unchallenged. She even alleged she had been abused at Conservative Central Office
by two former cabinet ministers.
Myers eventually died at 41 in mysterious circumstances. A report by a Scotland Yard
officer, Detective Sergeant Grant Lander, stated that he found it “quite incredible”
that the satanic abuse claims were taken at face value by experts when they were
demonstrably untrue.
Her case has alarming parallels with the satanic abuse cases of the late 1980s and
early 1990s in Cleveland, Orkney, Rochdale and Nottingham — where parents were
separated from their children on the basis of uncorroborated claims from selfprofessed
victims of ritual exploitation.
Since Carole’s death in 2005, her parents and brothers have pieced together much of
her medical history and the murky events surrounding her death.
Carole was registered as mentally ill for the last 13 years of her life, and she first
expressed her claims of ritual abuse only after she was given therapy to recover “lost”
— in reality, false — memories.
Her family are directing much of their ire at Dr Fleur Fisher, 75, head of ethics at the
BMA from 1991 to 1996, who treated Carole for psychological problems in the mid-
1980s. As well as referring her to other experts, Fisher, an expert in healthcare ethics,
struck up a close friendship with her.
It was Fisher who rang 999 on June 29, 2005, while on a train to Manchester, to ask
police to check on Carole’s wellbeing.
An hour and a half later Carole had been pronounced dead. She was found lying naked
from the waist down in her flat in Wandsworth, south London, surrounded by
medication. Questions remain over how she died, because there were no dangerous
levels of drugs in her system.
Fisher began making arrangements for Carole’s cremation. She told police and the
coroner’s office that she was Carole’s next of kin, and handed over a document
purportedly written by her late patient detailing her childhood history of alleged family
abuse.
It claimed Carole had been satanically abused “in every way conceivable or
imaginable” by her family, who had supposedly also killed her sister and placed Carole
on top of the body; set the family house on fire, and also murdered Carole’s own
children by ritual sacrifice. There is no independent evidence that Carole had children.
It is possible that Carole’s account drew on a series of real life family tragedies that
took place before she was born. Her fifth brother was stillborn; her baby sister died a
natural death from a hole in the heart, and there was also a fire at the family home.
Fisher temporarily took Carole’s car after her death, calling the insurers to tell them
she had been her “unofficial daughter” and asking to be insured to drive it so that she
could get to her Devon home as the train system was in chaos. Fisher also cleared
Carole’s flat of her possessions, giving them to the Salvation Army.
Carole’s family have since obtained a tape recording of a call made by Fisher to the
insurers in which she claimed that Carole had been subjected to “brutal family abuse
over many years”. When asked what should be done with the £357 refund on the
policy, Fisher asked it to be sent to her in order to help pay for Carole’s funeral.
Carole’s father, Joseph Felstead, a 68-year-old retired engineer from Stockport, his
wife Joan, and their sons, Kevin, David, Anthony and Richard, heard of her death only
when the coroner’s office rang the day before the planned cremation.
They had no inkling of the gathering crisis that had swallowed up Carole over 20
years. “Carole had been a lively, happy child,” said her father. “She qualified as a
nurse and then left home and eventually moved south to pursue her career.
“Her contact with the rest of the family became less, perhaps twice a year, but we
thought it was because she was so busy.”
Her medical files show that by 1986 Carole was seeing Fisher for “psychosexual
counselling”. A succession of psychiatric professionals, many of whom believed in the
existence of ritual abuse, went on to deal with her.
By 1998, Carole Myers, who had changed her name by deed poll from her birth name
of Carol Felstead, had succumbed to even more extreme delusions.
She talked of her parents as being high priest and high priestess of a satanic cult,
stating that they had stabbed her sister to death at the age of 10. She claimed a friend
she had confided in as a teenager was murdered by the cult in front of her, and that
she had been regularly fed urine and faeces. In 1999 she told one consultant psychologist that two Conservative former cabinet ministers had satanically abused her at party headquarters.
Over the years Fisher remained heavily involved with Carole as a friend, often
accompanying her to medical appointments.
The week before she died, Carole suddenly contacted her younger brother, Richard,
saying she wanted to come back to her family in Stockport. She never made it.
Richard wrote a letter to his sister on June 29, the day she was found dead. This was
found by Fisher and given to the coroner’s office, who called Richard on July 14.
Carole’s parents, who until then had known nothing of Carole’s medical history,
stopped the cremation — she was later buried — and only then found out about the
allegations Carole had made against them. “That led to a great unravelling while we
pieced it all together,” said Joseph Felstead.
To his horror, Felstead found that he and his wife, who died last year, were logged on
the Metropolitan police computer system as having stood trial for satanic abuse in
Manchester in 1990, another of Carole’s unsubstantiated claims.
She had made an allegation that year to police in Manchester about abuse, which
officers had discounted without ever contacting her family.
After a complaint was made against her by Felstead, Fisher was questioned under
caution in 2009 about her attempt to assume control over Carole’s body and estate.
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) decided there was insufficient evidence to
prosecute, as it would have been difficult to show dishonest intent.
However, in a report that was sent to the family, the investigating officer, Lander,
wrote: “I find it quite incredible that Dr Fisher seemed to take everything Carole told
her on face value.
“The reviewing lawyer from the CPS notes that this seems to have had a snowball
effect, and the other professionals seem to have accepted what was said by Carole
and what was recorded in her medical notes.”
Adding that there was no evidence that Carole’s family had ever abused her, he said:
“The relationship Dr Fisher developed with Carole in my opinion was misguided.”
Joseph Felstead said: “We want answers. My late wife did not even know how her
daughter died.”
Fisher said she had acted in good faith. “Carole went to great lengths to distance
herself from her family,” she said, including changing her name. Fisher said that
Carole had “no knowledge” of any ritual abuse when she first saw her.


Spike It


In journalistic parlance, spiking refers to withholding a story from publication for reasons pertaining to its veracity (whether or not it conforms to the facts). Spiking is relatively rare and usually happens late in the editing process (after the assigning editor has signed off on it). It is only required when a simple edit or questioning the reporter or assigning editor cannot fix the problem.
Reasons for spiking include a clear bias (someone on an opposing side of an issue did not respond, despite the fact that said response is central to the story), a major hole (many, if not most, readers will have a question after reading the story) or a sudden change in events (three more people have died, but getting details from officials is impossible on deadline).
In some cases, a story may be spiked if it is deemed to conflict with the commercial interests of the newspaper's publisher: if, for example, it concerns a company with which the publisher has a close relationship. This is more likely at a local level, where small newspapers are dependent on advertising revenue from businesses such as estate agents and recruitment agencies.
Stories are spiked for other reasons, but the decision is not taken lightly, as a valid, usually detailed explanation will be solicited by those further up the chain of command, often at the behest of the reporter.

Benghazi: Mutiny and Sedition


"Why doth Treason never prosper...?

...for if it prospered, none dare call it "Treason"...."


Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)





ART. 94. MUTINY OR SEDITION


(a) Any person subject to this chapter who--

(1) with intent to usurp or override lawful military authority, refuses, in concert with any other person, to obey orders or otherwise do his duty or creates any violence or disturbance is guilty of mutiny;

(2) with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of lawful civil authority, creates, in concert with any other person, revolt, violence, or disturbance against that authority is guilty of sedition;

(3) fails to do his utmost to prevent and suppress a mutiny or sedition being committed in his presence, or fails to take all reasonable means to inform his superior commissioned officer or commanding officer of a mutiny or sedition which he knows or has reason to believe is taking place, is guilty of a failure to suppress or report a mutiny or sedition.

(b) A person who is found guilty of attempted mutiny, mutiny, sedition, or failure to suppress or report a mutiny or sedition shall be punished by death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct.

Note: For specific details concerning this offense, including elements of proof, maximum punishments, and detailed explanation, see  "Punitive Articles of the UCMJ"





Punitive Articles of the UCMJ 


Article 106a—Espionage


(a)

“(1) Any person subject to this chapter who, with intent or reason to believe that it is to be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of a foreign nation, communicates, delivers, or transmits, or attempts to communicate, deliver, or transmit, to any entity described in paragraph (2), either directly or indirectly, anything described in paragraph (3) shall be punished as a court-martial may direct, except that if the accused is found guilty of an offense that directly concerns (A) nuclear weaponry, military spacecraft or satellites, early warning systems, or other means of defense or retaliation against large scale attack, (B) war plans, (C) communications intelligence or cryptographic information, or (D) any other major weapons system or major element of defense strategy, the accused shall be punished by death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct.

 (2) An entity referred to in paragraph (1) is—

(A) a foreign government;

(B) a faction or party or military or naval force within a foreign country, whether recognized or unrecognized by the United States; or

 (C) a representative, officer, agent, employee, subject, or citizen of such a government, faction, party, or force.


(3) A thing referred to in paragraph (1) is a document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, note, instrument, appliance, or information relating to the national defense.

(b)

(1) No person may be sentenced by court-martial to suffer death for an offense under this section (article) unless—

(A) the m bers of the court-martial unanimously find at least one of the aggravating factors set out in subsection (c); and

(B) the members unanimously determine that any extenuating or mitigating circumstances are substantially outweighed by any aggravating circumstances, including the aggravating factors set out under subsection (c).

(2) Findings under this subsection may be based on— (A) evidence introduced on the issue of guilt or innocence; (B) evidence introduced during the sentencing proceeding; or

(C) all such evidence. (3) The accused shall be given broad latitude to present matters in extenuation and mitigation.

(c) A sentence of death may be adjudged by a court-martial for an offense under this section (article) only if the members unanimously find, beyond a reasonable doubt, one or more of the following aggravating factors:

(1) The accused has been convicted of another offense involving espionage or treason for which either a sentence of death or imprisonment for life was authorized by statute.

(2) In the commission of the offense, the accused knowingly created a grave risk of substantial damage to the national security.

(3) In the commission of the offense, the accused knowingly created a grave risk of death to another person.

(4) Any other factor that may be prescribed by the President by regulations under section 836 of this title (Article 36).”


Elements.
 

(1) Espionage.

(a) That the accused communicated, delivered, or transmitted any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, note, instrument, appliance, or information relating to the national defense;
 

(b) That this matter was communicated, delivered, or transmitted to any foreign government, or to any faction or party or military or naval force within a foreign country, whether recognized or unrecognized by the United States, or to any representative, officer, agent, employee, subject or citizen thereof, either directly or indirectly; and

(c) That the accused did so with intent or reason to believe that such matter would be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of a foreign nation.

(2) Attempted espionage.
(a) That the accused did a certain overt act;

(b) That the act was done with the intent to commit the offense of espionage;

(c) That the act amounted to more than mere preparation; and

(d) That the act apparently tended to bring about the offense of espionage.


(3) Espionage as a capital offense.

(a) That the accused committed espionage or attempted espionage; and

(b) That the offense directly concerned (1) nuclear weaponry, military spacecraft or satellites, early warning systems, or other means of defense or retaliation against large scale attack, (2) war plans, (3) communications intelligence or cryptographic information, or (4) any other major weapons system or major element of defense strategy.

Explanation.

(1) Intent. “Intent or reason to believe” that the information “is to be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of a foreign nation” means that the accused acted in bad faith and with-out lawful authority with respect to information that is not lawfully accessible to the public.


(2) National defense information. “Instrument, appliance, or information relating to the national defense” includes the full range of modern technology and matter that may be developed in the future, including chemical or biological agents, computer technology, and other matter related to the national defense.

(3) Espionage as a capital offense. Capital punishment is authorized if the government alleges and proves that the offense directly concerned (1) nuclear weaponry, military spacecraft or satellites, early warning systems, or other means of defense or retaliation against large scale attack, (2) war plans, (3) communications intelligence or cryptographic in-formation, or (4) any other major weapons system or major element of defense strategy. See R.C.M. 1004 concerning sentencing proceedings in capital cases.


Lesser included offense. Although no lesser included offenses are set forth in the Code, federal civilian offenses on this matter may be incorporated through the third clause of Article 134.


Maximum punishment.


(1) Espionage as a capital offense. Death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct. See R.C.M. 1003.


(2) Espionage or attempted espionage. Any punishment, other than death, that a court-martial may direct. See R.C.M. 1003.


Punitive Articles of the UCMJ
Article 94—Mutiny and sedition


a) "Any person subject to this chapter who--

(1) with intent to usurp or override lawful military authority, refuse, in concert with any other person, to obey orders or otherwise do his duty or creates any violence or disturbance is guilty of mutiny;(2) with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of lawful civil authority, creates, in concert with any other person, revolt, violence, or other disturbance against that authority is guilty of sedition;(3) fails to do his utmost to prevent and suppress a mutiny or sedition being committed in his presence, or fails to take all reasonable means to inform his superior commissioned officer or commanding officer of a mutiny or sedition which he knows or has reason to believe is taking place, is guilty of a failure to suppress or report a mutiny or sedition.

(b) A person who is found guilty of attempted mutiny, mutiny, sedition, or failure to suppress or report a mutiny or sedition shall be punished by death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct."


Elements.

(1) Mutiny by creating violence or disturbance.



(a) That the accused created violence or a disturbance; and(b) That the accused created this violence or disturbance with intent to usurp or override lawful military authority.


(2) Mutiny by refusing to obey orders or perform duty.

(a) That the accused refused to obey orders or otherwise do the accused's duty;


(b) That the accused in refusing to obey orders or perform duty acted in concert with another person or persons; and(c) That the accused did so with intent to usurp or override lawful military authority.


(3) Sedition.

(a) That the accused created revolt, violence, or disturbance against lawful civil authority;(b) That the accused acted in concert with another person or persons; and(c) That the accused did so with the intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of that authority.


(4) Failure to prevent and suppress a mutiny or sedition.

(a) That an offense of mutiny or sedition was committed in the presence of the accused; and(b) That the accused failed to do the accused's utmost to prevent and suppress the mutiny or sedition.


(5) Failure to report a mutiny or sedition.

(a) That an offense of mutiny or sedition occurred;(b) That the accused knew or had reason to believe that the offense was taking place; and(c) That the accused failed to take all reasonable means to inform the accused's superior commissioned officer or commander of the offense.


(6) Attempted mutiny.

(a) That the accused committed a certain overt act;(b) That the act was done with specific intent to commit the offense of mutiny;(c) That the act amounted to more than mere preparation; and(d) That the act apparently tended to effect the commission of the offense of mutiny.


Explanation.


(1) Mutiny. Article 94( a)(1) defines two types of mutiny, both requiring an intent to usurp or override military authority.

(a) Mutiny by creating violence or disturbance. Mutiny by creating violence or disturbance may be committed by one person acting alone or by more than one acting together.(b) Mutiny by refusing to obey orders or perform duties. Mutiny by refusing to obey orders or perform duties requires collective insubordination and necessarily includes some combination of two or more persons in resisting lawful military authority. This concert of insubordination need not be preconceived, nor is it necessary that the insubordination be active or violent. It may consist simply of a persistent and concerted refusal or omission to obey orders, or to do duty, with an insubordinate intent, that is, with an intent to usurp or override lawful military authority. The intent may be declared in words or inferred from acts, omissions, or surrounding circumstances.


(2) Sedition. Sedition requires a concert of action in resistance to civil authority. This differs from mutiny by creating violence or disturbance. See subparagraph c(1)( a) above.

(3) Failure to prevent and suppress a mutiny or sedition. "Utmost" means taking those measures to prevent and suppress a mutiny or sedition which may properly be called for by the circumstances, including the rank, responsibilities, or employment of the person concerned. "Utmost" includes the use of such force, including deadly force, as may be reasonably necessary under the circumstances to prevent and suppress a mutiny or sedition.

(4) Failure to report a mutiny or sedition. Failure to "take all reasonable means to inform" includes failure to take the most expeditious means available. When the circumstances known to the accused would have caused a reasonable person in similar circumstances to believe that a mutiny or sedition was occurring, this may establish that the accused had such "reason to believe" that mutiny or sedition was occurring. Failure to report an impending mutiny or sedition is not an offense in violation of Article 94. But see paragraph 16c(3), (dereliction of duty).

(5) Attempted mutiny. For a discussion of attempts, see paragraph 4.


Lesser included offenses.

(1) Mutiny by creating violence or disturbance.
 

(a) Article 90--assault on commissioned officer(b) Article 91--assault on warrant, noncommissioned, or petty officer(c) Article 94--attempted mutiny(d) Article 116--riot; breach of peace(e) Article 128--assault(f) Article 134--disorderly conduct


(2) Mutiny by refusing to obey orders or perform duties.

(a) Article 90--willful disobedience of commissioned officer(b) Article 91--willful disobedience of warrant, noncommissioned, or petty officer(c) Article 92--failure to obey lawful order(d) Article 94--attempted mutiny


(3) Sedition.


(a) Article 116--riot; breach of peace(b) Article 128--assault(c) Article 134--disorderly conduct(d) Article 80--attempts



Maximum punishment. 

For all offenses under Article 94, death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct.











Usama Bin Laden's Last Press Release - 28 September 2001

Usama Bin Laden:

"Neither I had any knowledge of these attacks nor I consider the killing of innocent women, children, and other humans as an appreciable act.

 slam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children, and other people. 

Such a practice is forbidden ever in the course of a battle. ... 

I have already said that we are against the American system, not against its people, whereas in these attacks, the common American people have been killed."

Interview with Karachi Ummat (28 September 2001)





All True Muslims believe is the exact word of the one God (Allah), direct from his lips to his last Prophet on Earth, and the Quran (God (Allah)) says this exactly this (and nothing else) on the subject of war:

“To those against whom war is made, permission is given (to fight), because they are wronged;-
and verily, Allah is most powerful for their aid;-
(They are) those who have been expelled from their homes in defiance of right,
- (for no cause) except that they say, “our Lord is Allah”.
Did not Allah check one set of people by means of another, there would surely have been pulled down monasteries, churches, synagogues, and mosques, in which the name of Allah is commemorated in abundant measure…” 
[Al-Qur’an 22:39-40]

“And why should ye not fight in the cause of God and of those who, being weak, are ill-treated (and oppressed)? 
– Men, women and children, whose cry is: “Our Lord! Rescue us from this town, whose people are oppressors; 
and raise for us from thee one who will protect; 
and raise for us from thee one who will help!” 
[Al-Qur’an 4:75]

“O ye who believe! stand out firmly for Allah, as witnesses to fair dealing, and let not the hatred of others to you make you swerve to wrong and depart from justice. Be just: that is next to piety: and fear Allah. For Allah is well-acquainted with all that ye do.” 
[Al-Qur’an 5:8]

“Let there be no compulsion in religion”
[Al-Qur’an 2:256]

“If it had been thy Lord’s will, they would all have believed,- all who are on earth! wilt thou then compel mankind, against their will, to believe!” 
[Al-Qur’an 10:99]
“But if the enemy incline towards peace, do thou (also) incline towards peace, and trust in Allah: for He is One that heareth and knoweth (all things)” 
[Al-Qur’an 8:61]

And also, by way of clarification in the ancient Haddith, or Sayings of the Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him)   , 
 the instructions of the Prophet are as follows:
“Do not kill any old person, any child or any woman” “Do not kill the monks in monasteries”

or “Do not kill the people who are sitting in places of worship.”

During a war, the Prophet saw the corpse of a woman lying on the ground and observed:

“She was not fighting. How then she came to be killed?”

Thus non-combatants are guaranteed security of life even if their state is at war with an Islamic state.








All True Muslims believe is the exact word of the one God (Allah), direct from his lips to his last Prophet on Earth, and the Quran (God (Allah)) says this exactly this (and nothing else) on the subject of war:
All True Muslims believe is the exact word of the one God (Allah), direct from his lips to his last Prophet on Earth, and the Quran (God (Allah)) says this exactly this (and nothing else) on the subject of war:

“To those against whom war is made, permission is given (to fight), because they are wronged;-
and verily, Allah is most powerful for their aid;-
(They are) those who have been expelled from their homes in defiance of right,
- (for no cause) except that they say, “our Lord is Allah”.
Did not Allah check one set of people by means of another, there would surely have been pulled down monasteries, churches, synagogues, and mosques, in which the name of Allah is commemorated in abundant measure…” 
[Al-Qur’an 22:39-40]
“And why should ye not fight in the cause of God and of those who, being weak, are ill-treated (and oppressed)? 
– Men, women and children, whose cry is: “Our Lord! Rescue us from this town, whose people are oppressors; 
and raise for us from thee one who will protect; 
and raise for us from thee one who will help!” 
[Al-Qur’an 4:75]
“O ye who believe! stand out firmly for Allah, as witnesses to fair dealing, and let not the hatred of others to you make you swerve to wrong and depart from justice. Be just: that is next to piety: and fear Allah. For Allah is well-acquainted with all that ye do.” 
[Al-Qur’an 5:8]
“Let there be no compulsion in religion”
[Al-Qur’an 2:256]
“If it had been thy Lord’s will, they would all have believed,- all who are on earth! wilt thou then compel mankind, against their will, to believe!” 
[Al-Qur’an 10:99]
“But if the enemy incline towards peace, do thou (also) incline towards peace, and trust in Allah: for He is One that heareth and knoweth (all things)” 
[Al-Qur’an 8:61]

And also, by way of clarification in the ancient Haddith, or Sayings of the Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him)   , 
 the instructions of the Prophet are as follows:
“Do not kill any old person, any child or any woman” “Do not kill the monks in monasteries”

or “Do not kill the people who are sitting in places of worship.”

During a war, the Prophet saw the corpse of a woman lying on the ground and observed:

“She was not fighting. How then she came to be killed?”

Thus non-combatants are guaranteed security of life even if their state is at war wit
“To those against whom war is made, permission is given (to fight), because they are wronged;-
and verily, Allah is most powerful for their aid;-
(They are) those who have been expelled from their homes in defiance of right,
- (for no cause) except that they say, “our Lord is Allah”.
Did not Allah check one set of people by means of another, there would surely have been pulled down monasteries, churches, synagogues, and mosques, in which the name of Allah is commemorated in abundant measure…” 
[Al-Qur’an 22:39-40]
“And why should ye not fight in the cause of God and of those who, being weak, are ill-treated (and oppressed)? 
– Men, women and children, whose cry is: “Our Lord! Rescue us from this town, whose people are oppressors; 
and raise for us from thee one who will protect; 
and raise for us from thee one who will help!” 
[Al-Qur’an 4:75]
“O ye who believe! stand out firmly for Allah, as witnesses to fair dealing, and let not the hatred of others to you make you swerve to wrong and depart from justice. Be just: that is next to piety: and fear Allah. For Allah is well-acquainted with all that ye do.” 
[Al-Qur’an 5:8]
“Let there be no compulsion in religion”
[Al-Qur’an 2:256]
“If it had been thy Lord’s will, they would all have believed,- all who are on earth! wilt thou then compel mankind, against their will, to believe!” 
[Al-Qur’an 10:99]
“But if the enemy incline towards peace, do thou (also) incline towards peace, and trust in Allah: for He is One that heareth and knoweth (all things)” 
[Al-Qur’an 8:61]

And also, by way of clarification in the ancient Haddith, or Sayings of the Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him)   , 
 the instructions of the Prophet are as follows:
“Do not kill any old person, any child or any woman” “Do not kill the monks in monasteries”

or “Do not kill the people who are sitting in places of worship.”

During a war, the Prophet saw the corpse of a woman lying on the ground and observed:

“She was not fighting. How then she came to be killed?”

Thus non-combatants are guaranteed security of life even if their state is at war with an Islamic state.

All True Muslims believe is the exact word of the one God (Allah), direct from his lips to his last Prophet on Earth, and the Quran (God (Allah)) says this exactly this (and nothing else) on the subject of war:

“To those against whom war is made, permission is given (to fight), because they are wronged;-
and verily, Allah is most powerful for their aid;-
(They are) those who have been expelled from their homes in defiance of right,
- (for no cause) except that they say, “our Lord is Allah”.
Did not Allah check one set of people by means of another, there would surely have been pulled down monasteries, churches, synagogues, and mosques, in which the name of Allah is commemorated in abundant measure…” 
[Al-Qur’an 22:39-40]
“And why should ye not fight in the cause of God and of those who, being weak, are ill-treated (and oppressed)? 
– Men, women and children, whose cry is: “Our Lord! Rescue us from this town, whose people are oppressors; 
and raise for us from thee one who will protect; 
and raise for us from thee one who will help!” 
[Al-Qur’an 4:75]
“O ye who believe! stand out firmly for Allah, as witnesses to fair dealing, and let not the hatred of others to you make you swerve to wrong and depart from justice. Be just: that is next to piety: and fear Allah. For Allah is well-acquainted with all that ye do.” 
[Al-Qur’an 5:8]
“Let there be no compulsion in religion”
[Al-Qur’an 2:256]
“If it had been thy Lord’s will, they would all have believed,- all who are on earth! wilt thou then compel mankind, against their will, to believe!” 
[Al-Qur’an 10:99]
“But if the enemy incline towards peace, do thou (also) incline towards peace, and trust in Allah: for He is One that heareth and knoweth (all things)” 
[Al-Qur’an 8:61]

And also, by way of clarification in the ancient Haddith, or Sayings of the Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him)   , 
 the instructions of the Prophet are as follows:
“Do not kill any old person, any child or any woman” “Do not kill the monks in monasteries”

or “Do not kill the people who are sitting in places of worship.”

During a war, the Prophet saw the corpse of a woman lying on the ground and observed:

“She was not fighting. How then she came to be killed?”

Thus non-combatants are guaranteed security of life even if their state is at war with an Islamic state.