Showing posts with label 9/11. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 9/11. Show all posts

Tuesday 26 July 2016

Queen of the Damned


Singer Mary J Blige would always mention how Aaliyah’s death totally changed her life. After reading interviews with Mary J about the singers death, it makes one wonder…
Interview with Oprah Magazine:
Oprah: What brought you to that point? I know 9/11 was traumatic for you.
Mary: Yes. And Aaliyah had just died. [Recording artist Aaliyah's plane crashed on August 25, 2001.] My life was her life. She was surrounded by people who weren’t telling her the real deal. We weren’t close friends, but I’d talked with her a couple of times. I very well could’ve been the woman on that plane.
Oprah: It was your wake-up call.
Mary: Yes. I was doing a show at the Apollo Theater in Harlem. Kendu and I weren’t married yet, and I overheard him say, “If Mary comes in this house drunk tonight, I’m gonna leave her.” So during the performance, “I kept thinking, I’m going to go home sober and tell him I’m not gonna drink anymore.” After the show, I received a call from the girl who always got the drinks and drugs. When I went to her house, she had the biggest bottle of wine she could find on the table. I took off all my makeup and just sat there. “You want a glass of wine?” she asked. I said no. I got up and left for home at 10 o’clock that night. Normally, I’d be stepping in the house at 4 in the morning. When I came in without alcohol on my breath, Kendu said, “I’m so proud of you.” That same night, we got the call: Aaliyah was dead.
Oprah: Has your transformation compelled you toward a greater responsibility in your artistry and lyrics?
Mary: Absolutely. One reason I turned my life around is that I realized millions of fans were following my example. I don’t want to be responsible for killing us. I want to be responsible for uplifting us. In the song “Family Affair,” I sing about getting drunk….
A different interview:
“MARY J BLIGE gave up her drink and drug-fueled lifestyle after experiencing the shock of fellow R+B star AALIYAH’s untimely death.
The 34-year-old singer became paranoid about her own demise after hearing the ROMEO MUST DIE beauty had been killed in a plane crash in the Bahamas in 2001.
Blige explains, “She (Aaliyah) wasn’t a close friend. It was just that when I saw her die, that’s when I discovered the fact that I’m next.I don’t know how or when, but I’m next.
“I don’t know what kind of freak accident they’re going to put me in, or what kind of overdose of heroin they’re going to sort out, but at the end of the day, I knew I was next. “I just thought, I’m scared.”
“…I don’t even know what to say. Uh. I just know that, that was a murder. You know what I’m saying? That was a spiritual murder whether people know it or not because God don’t kill people. You know what I’m saying? Whether people know it or not. I could go deeper. For a lot of people I would really have to bring proof. You know what I’m saying? from what I learned. She was cut down from the prime of her life. It’s so unfair…I believe it wasn’t her time because from what I know, it ain’t suppose to go down like that. Simple obedience like, your gut always warns you. Your gut never lies to you. Something like luggage, clothes and jewelry and all this madness that we worship, it’s called false idols. We really need to look at the bigger picture right now and how honey could be here right now…”




'Movie vampire told me to kill'
Allan Menzies said he was visited by a vampire
A man accused of murdering his friend has told a court how he "wanted to go out and murder people" after watching a vampire film about 100 times.

Allan Menzies, 22, claimed that he was ordered to kill Thomas McKendrick by a character in the movie Queen Of The Damned.

He said at the High Court in Edinburgh that he was told he would be rewarded with immortality and become a vampire "in the next life".

Mr Menzies said he was visited in his West Lothian home by the female vampire Akasha, who was played in the film by the late US singer Aaliyah.

He was giving evidence on the sixth day of his trial.

Bedroom visits

Mr Menzies denies killing Mr McKendrick, who he had known since he was four years old, on 11 December last year and attempting to defeat the ends of justice.

The jury has been told that his offer to plead guilty to culpable homicide on the grounds of diminished responsibility was rejected by the Crown.

Mr Menzies, from Fauldhouse, said Akasha visited him in his bedroom.

"In general terms, she started off having conversations with me and it ended up that I had basically agreed with her that if I murdered people I would be rewarded in the next life," he said.

" I heard it in my mind, basically, that the two of them were plotting to kill me  "
Allan Menzies
"I would be made immortal in the next life - a vampire, basically."

He said that he believed Mr McKendrick and another friend, Stuart Unwin, wanted to kill him.

"I heard it in my mind, basically, that the two of them were plotting to kill me," he said.

Mr Menzies told the court he had killed Mr McKendrick using a bowie knife, a kitchen knife and a hammer.

But he said his father Thomas and Mr Unwin had been responsible for disposing of the body.

He said he had not told the police about this to protect his father.

State hospital

Mr Menzies told the court that Akasha had continued to visit him after the killing, but he rejected demands that he kill more people.

He also said the film character had visited him at Carstairs, where he has been a patient for five months.

Mr Menzies said he was "disappointed" that there were no other vampires in the state hospital.

Earlier, two psychiatrists said that Menzies was not suffering from a severe mental illness at the time of the attack.

Personality disorder

Defence counsel Donald MacLeod suggested his client suffered from paranoid schizophrenia.

However, that was rejected by consultant forensic psychiatrists Derek Chiswick and Colin Gray.

Dr Chiswick, 58, said he believed Mr Menzies suffered from an "anti-social personality disorder".

But he said it was "extremely unlikely" that he was a paranoid schizophrenic.

Friday 22 July 2016

Anthropomorphic Dummies

This is NOT a Human Being


I remember things happening on 9/11 I know DID NOT HAPPEN.

That has nothing to do with Parallel Universes and everything to do with The Big Lie.

I never saw any jumpers on 9/11 and anyone who says they did is a damn liar.

But I still remember it. 

Even though I KNOW it didn't happen.





And the same people who say "That isn't true", will tell you, if you ask them about Roswell will say

"Those were anthropomorphic dummies".


Tuesday 19 July 2016

Salt the Earth


"It was an experiment. The Initiative represented the Government's interests in not only controlling the otherworldly menace, but harnessing its power for our own military purposes. 

The considered opinion of this counsel is that this experiment has failed. 

Once the prototype took control of the complex, our soldiers suffered a 40% casualty rate. 

Only through the actions of the deserter and a group of civilian insurrectionists that our losses were not total. I trust the irony of that is not lost on any of us. 

Maggie Walsh's vision was brilliant, but ultimately unsupportable. 
The demons cannot be harnessed. 

The end result cannot be controlled. 

It is therefore our recommendation that this project be terminated and all records concerning it expunged. 
Our soldiers'll be debriefed. 
Standard confidentiality clause. 
We will monitor the civilians and usual measures prepared should they try to go public. 
I don't think they will. 

The Initiative itself will be filled in with concrete. 

Burn it down, gentlemen. 
Burn it down, and salt the Earth."


"Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam."

"Furthermore, Carthage must be destroyed."

- Cato the Elder

"I have run the plough over it, like the ancient Carthage of Africa, and I have had salt sown upon it...."

- Bonniface VIII

"Why are those who emulate Bin Laden called terrorists and the people who kill children, rebels? Where is the logic?

Because certain political circles in the West want to weaken Russia just like the Romans wanted to destroy Carthage.

But we will not allow this scenario to come to pass."
- Vladimir Putin



Address by President Vladimir Putin

PRESIDENT VLADIMIR PUTIN: 

Speaking is hard. It is painful. 

A terrible tragedy has taken place in our world. Over these last few days each and every one of us has suffered greatly and taken deeply to heart all that was happening in the Russian town of Beslan. There, we found ourselves confronting not just murderers, but people who turned their weapons against helpless children. 
I would like now, first of all, to address words of support and condolence to those people who have lost what we treasure most in this life – our children, our loved and dear ones.

I ask that we all remember those who lost their lives at the hands of terrorists over these last days.

*      *      *

Russia has lived through many tragic events and terrible ordeals over the course of its history. Today, we live in a time that follows the collapse of a vast and great state, a state that, unfortunately, proved unable to survive in a rapidly changing world. But despite all the difficulties, we were able to preserve the core of what was once the vast Soviet Union, and we named this new country the Russian Federation.  

We all hoped for change, change for the better. But  many of the changes that took place in our lives found us unprepared. Why ? 

We are living at a time of an economy in transition, of a political system  that does not yet correspond to the state and level of our society’s development. 
We are living through a time when internal conflicts and interethnic divisions that were once firmly suppressed by the ruling ideology have now flared up.   

We stopped paying the required attention to defence and security issues and we allowed corruption to undermine our judicial and law enforcement system.

Furthermore, our country, formerly protected by the most powerful defence system along the length of its external frontiers overnight found itself   defenceless both from the east and the west. 
It will take many years and billions of roubles to create new, modern and genuinely protected borders.
But even so, we could have been more effective if we had acted professionally and at the right moment.
In general, we need to admit that we did not fully understand the complexity and the dangers of the processes at work in our own country and in the world. In any case, we proved unable to react adequately. We showed ourselves to be weak. And the weak get beaten.

Some would like to tear from us a “juicy piece of pie”. Others help them. They help, reasoning that Russia still remains one of the world’s major nuclear powers, and as such still represents a threat to them. And so they reason that this threat should be removed.

Terrorism, of course, is just an instrument  to achieve these aims. 
As I have said many times already, we have found ourselves confronting crises, revolts and terrorist acts on more than one occasion. But what has happened now, this crime committed by terrorists, is unprecedented in its inhumanness and cruelty. This is not a challenge to the President, parliament or government. It is a challenge to all of Russia, to our entire people. Our country is under attack.

*         *         *

The terrorists think they are stronger than us. They think they can frighten us with their cruelty, paralyse our will and sow disintegration in our society. It would seem that we have a choice - either to resist them or to agree to their demands. To give in, to let them destroy and plunder Russia in the hope that they will finally leave us in peace.

As the President, the head of the Russian state, as someone who swore an oath to defend this country and its territorial integrity, and simply as a citizen of Russia, I am convinced that in reality we have no choice at all. Because to allow ourselves to be blackmailed and succumb to panic would be to immediately condemn millions of people to an endless series of bloody conflicts like those of Nagorny Karabakh, Trans-Dniester and other similar tragedies. We should not turn away from this obvious fact.  
What we are dealing with are not isolated acts intended to frighten us, not isolated terrorist attacks. What we are facing is direct intervention of international terror directed against Russia. This is a total, cruel and full-scale war that again and again is taking the lives of our fellow citizens.
World experience shows us that, unfortunately, such wars do not end quickly. In this situation we simply cannot and should not live in as carefree a manner as previously. We must create a much more effective security system and we must demand from our law enforcement agencies action that corresponds to the level and scale of the new threats that have emerged.  

But most important is to mobilise the entire nation in the face of this common danger. Events in other countries have shown that terrorists meet the most effective resistance in places where they not only encounter the state’s power but also find themselves facing an organised and united civil society.

*         *         *

Dear fellow citizens,
Those who sent these bandits to carry out this dreadful crime made it their aim to set our peoples against each other, put fear into the hearts of Russian citizens and unleash bloody interethnic strife in the North Caucasus. In this connection I have the following words to say.

First, a series of measures aimed at strengthening our country’s unity will soon be prepared.

Second, I think it is necessary to create a new system of coordinating the forces and means responsible for exercising control over the situation in the North Caucasus. Third, we need to create an effective anti-crisis management system including entirely new approaches to the way the law enforcement agencies work.

I want to stress that all of these measures will be implemented in full accordance with our country’s Constitution.

Dear friends,

We are living through very difficult and painful days. I would like now to thank all those who showed endurance and responsibility as citizens.

We were and always will be stronger than them, stronger through our morals, our courage and our sense of solidarity.

I saw this again last night.

In Beslan, which is literally soaked with grief and pain, people were showing care and support for each other more than ever.

They were not afraid to risk their own lives in the name of the lives and peace of others.

Even in the most inhuman conditions they remained human beings.

It is impossible to accept the pain caused by such loss, but these trials have brought us even closer together and have forced us to re-evaluate a lot of things.

Today we must be together, for it is only together that we will vanquish the enemy.









Russians Blast US-UK
Sponsorship Of Chechen Terror
By Webster Griffin Tarpley
tarpley@radix.net
9-17-4








Washington DC, September 14 -- In the wake of the terrorist atrocity at a school in Beslan, North Ossetia, in the Russian Federation, Russian President Vladimir Putin has made remarks to the western press which expose the key role of the US and British governments in backing Chechen terrorism. Whatever Putin's previous role in events regarding Chechnya, his current political posture is one which sharply undercuts the legitimacy of the supposed Anglo-American "war on terror," and which points up the hypocrisy of the Bush regime's pledge that it will make no distinction between the terrorists and those who harbor them -- since Washington and London are currently harboring Chechens implicated in terrorism. All in all, Putin's response to Chechen events has, with the third anniversary of 9/11, brought the collapse of the official 9/11 myth measurably closer. The hypocritical terror demagogy of Bush and Blair has now been undercut by the head of state of another permanent member of the UN Security Council...

On Monday September 6, Putin spoke for three and one half hours with a group of some 30 western correspondents and Russia experts at his dacha near Novo Ogarevo outside Moscow. There is no official transcript so far, but accounts have been published in The Guardian, The Independent, and Le Monde. The Washington Post waited until Friday, September 10 to publish an article, but left out the most significant remarks. There are now signs that the Anglo-American press is beginning a new campaign against Putin as a dictator, stressing the obvious in order to silence his attacks on the US-UK sponsorship of Chechen terror.

Putin, a KGB veteran who knows whereof he speaks, told the gathering that the school massacre showed that "certain western circles would like to weaken Russia, just as the Romans wanted to destroy Carthage." He thus suggested that the US and UK, not content with having bested Russia in the Cold War, now wanted to proceed to the dismemberment and total destruction of Russia a Carthaginian peace like the one the Romans finally imposed at the end of the Punic Wars in 146 BC, when they poured salt into the land of Carthage so nothing would every grow there again. (Le Monde, September 8, 2004)

"There is no link between Russian policy in Chechnya and the hostage-taking in Beslan," said Putin, meaning that the terrorists were using the Chechen situation as a pretext to attack Russia. According to a paraphrase in Le Monde: "The aim of that international terrorism, supported more or less openly by foreign states, whose names the Russian president didn't want to name, is to weaken Russia from the inside, by criminalizing its economy, by provoking its disintegration through propagating separatism in the Caucasus and the transformation of the region into a staging ground for actions directed against the Russian Federation."

"Mr. Putin," continues Le Monde, "reiterated the accusation he had launched in a veiled form against western countries which appear to use double-talk. On the one side, their leaders assure the Russian President of their solidarity in the fight against terrorism. On the other hand, the intelligence services and the military 'who have not abandoned their Cold War prejudices,' in Putin's words -- entertain contacts with those the international press calls the 'rebels.' 'Why are those who emulate Bin Laden called terrorists and the people who kill children, rebels? Where is the logic?' asked Vladimir Putin, and then gave the answer: 'Because certain political circles in the West want to weaken Russia just like the Romans wanted to destroy Carthage.' 'But, continued Putin, "we will not allow this scenario to come to pass.'"

Le Monde continues: "This is, according to [Putin] a bad calculation, because Russia is a factor of stability. By weakening it, the Cold War nostalgics are clearly acting against the interests of their own country." In Putin's words: "We are the sincere champions of this cooperation [against terrorism], we are open and loyal partners. But if foreign services have contacts with the 'rebels,' they cannot be treated as reliable allies, as Russia is for them." (Le Monde, September 8, 2004)

In Guardian correspondent Jonathan Steele's account of the meeting with Putin, this is the Russian President's response to the US and UK on the question of negotiating with the Chechen guerrillas of Aslan Maskhadov: "Why don't you meet Osama bin Laden, invite him to Brussels or to the White House and engage in talks, ask him what he wants and give it to him so he leaves you in peace? You find it possible to set some limitations in your dealings with these bastards, so why should we talk to people who are child-killers?" (London Guardian, September 7, 2004)

As Michel Chossudovsky pointed out some years back, the Chechen leaders Basayev and Al Khattab were trained in the CIA-run camps for Islamic fighters in Afghanistan. In 1999, Putin rode to power on a backlash against Chechen terror which he had in all probability staged himself thus judoing a long-standing US-UK capability. The key point is that the Russian press is now openly denouncing London and Washington as centers for terrorist control. This can blow the lid off the 9-11 hoax.

On Saturday, September 4, Putin had delivered a national television address to the Russian people on the Beslan tragedy, which had left more than 300 dead, over half of them children. The main thrust was that terrorism constitutes international proxy warfare against Russia. Among other things Putin said: "In general, we need to admit that we did not fully understand the complexity and the dangers of the processes at work in our own country and in the world. In any case, we proved unable to react adequately. We showed ourselves to be weak, and the weak get beaten."

"Some people would like to tear from us a tasty morsel. Others are helping them. They are helping, reasoning that Russia still remains one of the world's major nuclear powers, and as such still represents a threat to them. And so they reason that this threat should be removed. Terrorism, of course, is just an instrument to achieve these gains."

"What we are dealing with, are not isolated acts intended to frighten us, not isolated terrorist attacks. What we are facing is direct intervention of international terror directed against Russia. This is a total, cruel and full-scale war that again and again is taking the lives of our fellow citizens." (Kremlin.ru, September 6, 2004)

Around the time of 9/11, Putin had pointed to open recruitment of Chechen terrorists going on in London, telling a German interviewer: "In London, there is a recruitment station for people wanting to join combat in Chechnya. Today -- not officially, but effectively in the open -- they are talking there about recruiting volunteers to go to Afghanistan." (Focus -- German weekly newsmagazine, September 2001) In addition, it is generally known in well-informed European circles that the leaders of the Chechen rebels were trained by the CIA, and that the Chechens were backed by US-sponsored anti-Russian fighters from Afghanistan. In recent months, US-UK backed Chechens have destroyed two Russian airliners and attacked a Moscow subway station, in addition to the school atrocity.

Some aspects of Putin's thinking were further explained by a press interview given by Aslambek Aslakhanov, the Chechen politician who is one of Putin's official advisors. A dispatch from RIA Novosti reported Aslakhanov's comments as follows: "The terrorists who seized the school in Beslan, North Ossetia, took their orders from abroad. 'They were talking with people not from Russia, but from abroad. They were being directed,' said Aslambek Aslakhanov, advisor to the President of the Russian Federation. 'It is the desire of our "friends" in quotation marks -- who have probably for more than a decade been carrying out enormous, titanic work, aimed at dismembering Russia. These people have worked very hard, and the fact that the financing comes from there and that they are the puppet masters, is also clear." Aslakhanov, who was named by the terrorists as one of the people they were going to hold talks with, also told RIA Novosti that the bid for such "talks" was completely phony. He said that the hostage-takers were not Chechens. When he talked to them, by phone, in Chechen, they demanded that he talk Russian, and the ones he spoke with had the accents of other North Caucasus ethnic groups. (RIA Novosti, September 6, 2004)

On September 7, RIA Novosti reported on the demand of the Russian Foreign Ministry that two leading Chechen figures be extradited from London and Washington to stand trial in Russia. A statement from the Russia Foreign Ministry's Department of Information and Press indicated that Russia will put the United States and Britain on the spot about extraditing two top Chechen separatist officials, who have been given asylum in Washington and London, respectively. They are Akhmad Zakayev, known as a "special representative" of Aslan Maskhadov (currently enjoying asylum in London), and Ilyas Akhmadov, the "Foreign Minister" of the unrecognized "Chechen Republic-Ichkeria" (now residing in the USA). (RIA Novosti, September 7, 2004)

"SCHOOL SEIZURE WAS PLANNED IN WASHINGTON AND LONDON"

This was the headline of an even more explicit unsigned commentary by the Russian news agency KMNews.ru. This analysis blames the Beslan school massacre squarely on the U.S. and British intelligence agencies. The point of departure here is that Shamil Basayev, the brutal Chechen field commander, has been linked to the attack (something that Putin advisor Aslambek Aslakhanov yesterday said was known to the Russian FSB, successor of the KGB). The article highlights the recent rapprochement of London and Washington with key representatives of Aslan Maskhadov: Britain's giving asylum to Akhmad Zakayev (December 2003) and the USA welcoming Ilyas Akhmadov (August 2004).

KMNews: CHECHEN TERROR BOSS ON US STATE DEPARTMENT PAYROLL KMNews writes: "In early August, ... 'Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Chechen Republic-Ichkeria' Ilyas Akhmadov received political asylum in the USA. And for his 'outstanding services,' Akhmadov received a Reagan-Fascell grant," including a monthly stipend, medical insurance, and a well-equipped office with all necessary support services, including the possibility of meetings with political circles and leading U.S. media...."What about our partners in the 'anti-terrorist coalition,' who provided asylum, offices and money to Maskhadov's representatives?" asks the Russian press agency. Citing the official expressions of sympathy and offers of help from President Bush, National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, and State Department spokesman Richard Boucher, KMNews warns: "But let's not shed tears of gratitude just yet. First we should ask: were 'Special Representative of the President of CRI' Zakayev or 'Minister of Foreign Affairs of the CRI' Akhmadov, located in Great Britain and the USA, aware of the terrorist acts that were in preparation? Beyond a doubt. And let's also find out, how Akhmadov is spending the money provided by the Reagan-Fascell Foundation. We note: this Foundation is financed by the U.S. Congress through the budget of the State Department! "Thus, the conclusion is obvious. Willingly or not, Downing Street and the White House provoked the guerrillas to these latest attacks. Willingly or not, Great Britain and the USA have nurtured the separatists with material, information and diplomatic resources. Willingly or not, the policy of London and Washington fostered the current terrorist acts." "As the ancients said, cui bono? Perhaps we are too hasty with such sweeping accusations against our 'friends' and 'partners'? Is there a motive for the Anglo-American 'anti-terrorist coalition' to fan the fires of terror in the North Caucasus?" "Alas, there is a motive. It is no secret, that the West is vitally interested in maintaining instability in the Caucasus. That makes it easier to pump out the fossil fuels, extracted in the Caspian region, and it makes it easier to control Georgia and Azerbaijan, and to exert influence on Armenia. Finally, it makes it easier to drive Russia out of the Caspian and the Caucasus. Divide et impera! - the leaders of the Roman Empire already introduced this simple formula for subjugation."

KMNews: TERROR SUPPORTERS "ON THE BANKS OF THE THAMES AND THE POTOMAC" KMNews continues: "Alas, it must be recognized that the co-authors of the current tragic events are to be found not in the Arab countries of the Middle East, but on the banks of the Thames and the Potomac. Will the leadership of Russia be able to make decisions, in this situation?" "Yes - if there is the political will. The first thing is that black must be called black, and white, white. It is time to admit that no "antiterrorist coalition" exists, that the West is pursuing its egotistical interests (spreading its political influence, seizing fossil fuels deposits, etc.). Our own coalition needs to be formed, with nations that are genuinely interested in eliminating terror in the North Caucasus. Finally, it is time to change the entire tactics and strategy of counterterrorism measures. It is obvious that catching female suicide bombers on the streets of Moscow or carrying out operations to free children who are taken hostage, are, so to speak, the 'last line of defense.' It is time to learn to make preemptive strikes against the enemy, and it's time to carry combat onto the territory of the enemy. Otherwise, we shall be defeated." (Source: KMNews.ru, September 7, 2004)

Izvestia stresses the probable ethnic composition of the terrorist death squad, and its likely role in exacerbating tensions in the ethnic labyrinth of the Caucasus. Izvestia finds the targeting of North Ossetia in the Beslan incident "not accidental," pointing to the danger of "irreversible consequences" for interethnic relations between Ossetians, Ingushis and Chechens. "Russia is now facing multi-vectored threats along the entire Caucasus," the paper writes. (Izvestia, September 3, 2004)

In the wake of Putin's speech, prominent Russian commentators discussed the recent terror campaign against Russia in terms of a possible "casus belli" for a new East-West conflict. Several commentaries have reaffirmed Putin's key statement, that international terrorism has no independent existence, but functions only as "an instrument," wielded by powerful international circles committed (in part) to the early destruction of Russia as a nuclear-armed power.

A commentary in the widely read Russian business news service RosBusinessConsult (RBC) was entitled "The West is unleashing Jihads against Russia." In language seldom heard since the end of the Cold War, RBC charges that the recent wave of terror attacks against Russia, beginning with the sabotage of two airplanes and a terror bombing at a Moscow subway station, and culminating so far in the Beslan attack, was immediately preceded by what RBC calls "an ultimatum from the West," for Russia to turn over the Caucasus region to "Anglo-Saxon control." height="140"> ANGLO-SAXON TERROR ULTIMATUM TO RUSSIA FROM THE LONDON ECONOMIST "Some days prior to the onset of the series of acts of terrorism in Russia, which has cost hundreds of lives, a number of extremely influential Western mass-media, expressing establishment positions, issued a personal warning to Vladimir Putin, that Russia should get out of the Caucasus, or else his political career would come to an end. Therefore, when the President on Saturday spoke of a declaration of war having been made against Russia, this was not just a matter of so-called 'international terrorism'... One week prior to the first acts of terrorism, the authoritative British magazine, the Economist, which expresses the positions of Great Britain's establishment, formulated the Western position concerning the Caucasus, and above all the policy of the Anglo-Saxon elite, in a very precise manner," RBC writes.

CZECH NGO BLOWS UP RUSSIAN TANK; BRITISH EXPERTS TRAIN CHECHEN GANGS

The RBC commentary goes on to cite the Economist of August 19, which contained what RBC characterizes as a virtual ultimatum to Russia. RBC notes that "the carrying out of such a series of coordinated, highly professional terrorist attacks, would be impossible without the help of qualified 'specialists'." RBC notes that at the end of August one such "specialist," working for an NGO based in the Czech republic, was arrested for blowing up a Russian armed personnel carrier. Also, British "experts" have been found instructing Chechen gangs in how to lay mines. "It cannot be excluded, that also in Beslan, the logistics of the operation were provided by just such 'specialists'," notes RBC.

The RBC editorial concludes: "Apparently, by having recourse to large-scale terrorist actions, the forces behind that terrorism, have now acted directly to force a 'change' in the political situation in the Caucasus, propagating interethnic wars into Russia. "The only way to resist this, would be for Moscow to make it known, that we are ready to fight a new war, according to new rules and new methods -- not with mythical 'international terrorists', who do not and never existed, but with the controllers of the 'insurgents and freedom fighters'; a war against the geopolitical puppet-masters, who are ready to destroy thousands of Russians for the sake of achieving their new division of the world." (RBC, September 7, 2004)

In a related comment, the Chairman of the Duma Foreign Affairs Committee, Dmitri Rogozin, declared in an interview on Sunday September 5: "I think [those behind the terrorism] are those who would like to see Russia totally discredited as a power.... I think that the aim is to destabilize the political situation in the country and plunge Russia into total chaos." (Ekho Moskvy, September 6, 2004)

Western press organs have responded to the school massacre with a campaign to blame, not the terrorists, but the Putin regime and Russian society. This disingenuous policy has further stoked Russian resentment. On September 6, Strana.ru headlined, "Western Press: The Tragedy Is Russia's Own Fault," commenting that "unlike official politicians, journalists do not want to admit that the bombings and hostage-takings in our country are acts of international terrorism." Another example of this Putin-bashing was the article by Masha Lippman in the Washington Post of September 9.

A basic reason for the US-UK surrogate warfare against Russia is the great Anglo-Saxon fear of a continental bloc of the type which emerged during the run up to Bush's Iraq aggression. The centerpiece of the continental bloc is the German-Russian relationship. Washington and London fear that Russia will soon agree to accept euros in payment for its oil deliveries. This would not just prevent the Anglo-Americans from further skimming off oil transactions between Russia and Europe. It would represent the beginning of the end of the dollar as the reserve currency of the world, a role which the battered greenback, weakened by Bush's $500 billion yearly trade deficit and Bush's $750 billion budget deficit, can no longer fulfill. If Russia moves to the euro, it is expected that the Eurasian giant may be quickly followed by Iran, Indonesia, Venezuela, and other countries. This could put an end to the ability of the US to run astronomical foreign trade deficits, and would place the question of a US return to a production-based economy on the agenda. The oil-euro question is expected to be discussed at the upcoming Russian-German economic summit.

RUSSIA TO PAY FOR OIL WITH EUROS? In a half-page article published in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung and headlined "Realizing the Strategic Partnership," Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov predicted key progress in the energy sector. Lavrov said that numerous proposals by Moscow on how to expand cooperation in the sphere of future-shaping high-tech branches of the economy will be put on the agenda of the September 11-12 German-Russian economic summit in Hamburg. Russia calls for the development of "mutually beneficial cooperation in aerospace, information technology, telecom, biotechnology, development of new materials, laser technology, and nanotechnology. Lavrov wrote that Russia expects a breakthrough at the Hamburg talks -- which will also deal with the energy sector. (Frankfurter Allgemeine, September 3, 2004)

Sunday 10 July 2016

The So-Called New Black Panther Party

And so on, and so on, and so on..










NOTE: This article was syndicated nationwide from the Washington City Paper, a freesheet that ran an extra edition by Mark Cohen, cover story Black Power.

This nationally syndicated, freely distributed article ran 1 week after the George W. Bush Counter-Innaugural in January 2001, 2 week prior to the death by exploding Brain Aneyrism in Meriat, Georgia of Khalid Abdul Muhammad, 8 months prior to 9/11 and 8 months following the death by Exploding Brain Anureysm in Meriat, Georgia of the Senior Senator from Georgia.



On July 19, 2000, Coverdell, having returned to Georgia from Washington for a weekend of speaking engagements and service to his constituents, died in Atlanta of a brain aneurysm. His papers are housed at the Ina Dillard Russell Library of Georgia College and State University in Milledgeville.








Jan. 19-25, 2001
BLACK POWER
The New Black Panther Party looks at whites and sees red.

by

Mark Francis Cohen

For Sharon Roach, the crusade began with a rally on Thursday, Sept. 28, at the Prince Hall Masonic Temple on U Street NW. She walked into the large auditorium crammed with more than 1,000 people, threaded her way to one of the back rows, and took an open seat. It was about 6:30 p.m., and the place was crowded, hot, and thrilling, like some urban tent revival. People fanned themselves with folded pieces of paper titled "Exposing and Countering the Conspiracy to Destroy Black Washington, D.C." The event, sponsored and heavily promoted by the nascent D.C. branch of the New Black Panther Party for Self Defense, had been billed in fliers and posters around the city as an "Emergency Black Unity Town Hall Meeting" on "the State of Black D.C."


Things got off to an inauspicious start, according to journalists who were there. The meeting started late, and the first few speakers rambled almost incoherently. One man recited a meandering poem; another prayed for the audience for what seemed like 15 minutes. The long evening would eventually stretch to more than three hours, and by the time the New Black Panthers passed a hat for contributions, more than half their audience had evaporated.

Roach, though, stayed for the whole thing. An office worker from nearby Shaw, she sat in the rear of the room, listening quietly, absorbing everything. And she found herself thoroughly mesmerized by the evening's main attraction: Malik Zulu Shabazz, the charismatic 34-year-old leader of the New Black Panthers, D.C. Division.

"As packed as it is...make way for your brother and sister tonight," Shabazz thundered from the podium. "We were stacked and packed like sardines on the slave ships coming over here. So you can sit next to your brother and sister tonight. We have endured much worse."

Tall, handsome, and a gifted speaker, Shabazz declared that "the city is right now under an outright taking, and what you once knew as Chocolate City, and what you once hoped for as a chocolate state, is now in serious jeopardy. Serious jeopardy.

"Most of our leadership is in the hip pocket of our enemy," Shabazz continued. "We are losing ground in Chocolate City economically, landwise, politically, socially....We are not paranoid. We have seen white people in U Street corridor. We have seen white people running around everywhere....Can't we have something for ourselves?"

At this point came Roach's favorite part of the evening. Shabazz began singling out Mayor Anthony A. Williams for particular ridicule, and now an assistant propped an easel with a pad of paper next to the New Black Panther leader. Shabazz theatrically declared it time to "grade" Williams' performance and issue "the white man in black skin" a report card. He polled the audience on seven subjects, asking them to raise their hands for the grade they thought the mayor deserved.

Shabazz declared himself open to all possible grades ("Do I see any hands for an A?") and dutifully scribbled the answers down. By the end of the exercise, the pad read:

Stopping White Flight Return (gentrification) (F)
Healthcare (F)
D.C. Schools (F)
Housing (F)
Black Youth support (F)
The audience had failed the mayor in all the "subjects." But in two additional categories, which Shabazz wrote on another sheet—"Accountability to Whites" and "Carrying Out the White Elite Agenda"—the audience gave him A's.

Riveted by all she heard, Roach, a woman in her mid-30s, enlisted in the Panthers that night. "What really touched me was the report card on the mayor," she explained later. "That really motivated me to join." Roach said she had not been involved in any political organizations before. "I went to the meeting, and they were saying things that I never heard leaders say before. They confronted issues straight on. They didn't sugarcoat them."

Not hardly. The New Black Panther Party for Self Defense scarcely shies from extremist black-separatist rhetoric. The D.C. chapter started only last summer and is guided by the simple goal of reasserting black dominance in the city. In Shabazz, the group has a leader who is a practicing attorney, a two-time council candidate, a former Howard University law student, an aspiring rap artist (sample lyrics: "Stand up black man, march on black man....Just be a man"), and a self-proclaimed disciple of Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan. Shabazz is occasionally referred to as the D.C. Panthers' minister of justice. Some critics consider him an outspoken racist and anti-Semite. 

Shabazz's ultimate dream, he says, is a black utopia in which black people don't interact with other races.

The September rally was a coming-out party of sorts for the Panthers' new chapter, but since then, the group has attracted wider attention. That's because, in late November, the Panthers led a noisy boycott and protest of a Korean-owned grocery store in Northeast, which grabbed some choice media coverage. The store ended up being vandalized and firebombed in the middle of the night, and although no one claims to know who was responsible for the crime, the incident sent a jolt of fear through the District's Korean-American business community.

The group also participated in Farrakhan's Million Family March in October, and Shabazz is the spokesperson for a Day of Outrage march on Jan. 20 to protest the presidential inauguration of George W. Bush.

As for Roach, she hardly conforms to the image of a radical black freedom fighter. She's soft-spoken, has twinkling eyes, and is a single mother of four. Almost 6 feet tall with straight, bobbed black hair and bangs, she has the confidence of a real estate agent and the easygoing manner of your best friend's mom.

Yet Roach holds some convictions that sound very similar to the Panthers' rhetoric, particularly on the topic of Asian-Americans working in the black community. "They're taking our money," she observes. "Koreans pass their businesses from one to another. They live in luxury off of our black dollars until they're ready to retire, and then they pass their business on to the next generation. That's why black people in the District aren't given any opportunities to open businesses."

ýRoach moved to D.C. from Alabama only two years ago and won't say where she's employed or what she does, other than that it is "office-related." She's a religious woman and a trained Baptist minister, although she's not currently active in that role. Her newfound commitment to the Panthers is a full-time project in itself, consuming up to 30 hours a week, she says.

"I've had to sacrifice time with my children," Roach says. "But it's worth it. It's for them and their future. I believe it's been in God's plan for this to happen. We needed someone to take a stand and take the lead for our community. Our people have been lying back for too long. They've been asleep. We've got to wake our people to what's going on in our community. I honestly believe that's why we're here."

Is Roach right? Are blacks being elbowed out of Chocolate City? Are they unwittingly complying with some kind of master plan to displace them? The numbers do show a racial shift in the District. Blacks are still the majority of the population of 572,059, but that majority has been declining. Current census estimates indicate that the numbers of whites, Latinos, and Asians in Washington are on the rise, while the number of black people is declining. Blacks now account for about 61 percent of D.C.'s residents, down from a 71 percent peak in 1970.

Because of the increase in the number of white residents, two things have occurred: The racial complexion of neighborhoods has changed, and the racial complexion of the city's power structure has changed. Prodded by a strong local economy and a renewed desire among whites to live in the city, communities that had been predominately occupied by blacks have been becoming more racially mixed. Neighborhoods like Adams Morgan, Columbia Heights, Shaw, the U Street corridor, and Capitol Hill are in flux, with more middle-income white residents moving in.

Some black Washingtonians find the expanding white population distressing—a phenomenon that's been dubbed, for lack of a more precise term, "gentrification." It is sometimes called the Plan: the idea being that whites are conspiring to marginalize D.C.'s black population. Gentrification, in its purest sense, is a function of economics, not race: Poorer neighborhoods become attractive to wealthier home buyers, whose purchases, in turn, dramatically increase property values and drive more poor residents out. But because local real estate prices have spiked at the same time that the number of white faces in the city has been increasing, some see the two as linked. And so the term "gentrification" has evolved into a shorthand phrase to describe white migration into the District.
Yet the decrease in the black population is as much a function of black flight out of the city as it is a function of white migration into the District. National fair-housing laws in the '70s pried open the suburbs and city outskirts like a crowbar. Black residents, like whites before them, suddenly fled the city for the distant, quiet streets of bedroom communities. In fact, so many African-Americans moved to rural Prince George's County that the county became heavily developed, majority-black, and mostly middle-class by the '80s.

The Panthers, for their part, interpret black flight and white gentrification as a conspiracy played on unsuspecting blacks by sinister whites. According to this theory, blacks were first brainwashed into abandoning their properties in the District for the white picket fences and green yards of the suburbs. Then, with the District's properties all but forsaken and nearly worthless, the white man came back and began buying everything up, completing the takeover.

As far-fetched as this may sound to some, at least it's a theory, some explanation for what's happening to the city's shrinking black base. And it may be enough to have a theory, even an implausible one, to build a following, says Ronald Walters, the director of the African American Leadership Institute at the University of Maryland. "So many things happen to oppressed people that they can't explain," Walters says. "There are those who want to hear someone give an explanation, no matter how outrageous it may be."

Shabazz and his New Black Panther Party eagerly articulate such an explanation—and offer a clear-cut plan of action. In the space of just a few months, Shabazz has managed to expand his membership swiftly and organize his followers fluently. The appearance of the New Black Panthers in D.C. doesn't surprise Walters, who says there is a vacuum of this type of leadership right now. "A lot of militant organizations in the black community have fallen by the wayside," he says. "And a lot of people want to see a group take a militant stance."

Another factor contributing to the attraction of the Panthers for some black D.C. residents is the recent change in the city's power structure, which Shabazz construes as a transfer of power from blacks to whites. This change grew pronounced with the 1998 District government elections. For the first time in the city's history, more whites than blacks were elected to the 13-member D.C. Council. Also, Williams was voted into office. Although black, the new mayor almost immediately found himself on bad terms with many of the city's black leaders, who had grown used to former Mayor Marion S. Barry's robust pro-black rhetoric. Williams was more conciliatory toward the white community, and when he came into office, he appointed whites to several key administration positions. Williams' African-American bona fides were constantly questioned. An early episode in which Williams reluctantly accepted the resignation of one of these administrators for using the word "niggardly" only contributed to this perception. "Is he black enough?" became his opponents' most devastating refrain, bluntly referring to both the mayor's light skin and his purported lack of allegiance to his fellow African-Americans.
Shabazz extends his conspiracy theory to both the mayor and D.C. Congressional Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton, who is also black. He says they are loyal only to whites and white businesses, and are largely responsible for the demise of Chocolate City. He charges that they have forged their own kind of affirmative-action program, whose purpose has been to suffuse the city with more whites in the name of stabilizing its economic base and achieving D.C. statehood. "The get is on to bring in more whites," Shabazz tells me. "If Washington, D.C., was 70 percent white, it would be made a state overnight." Shabazz interprets the $5,000 tax credit for first-time home buyers, the recent Board of Education overhaul, and the city's move to privatize or shut down D.C. General Hospital, the city's only public hospital, as measures designed to make the city more enticing to whites and to hurt blacks.
As he recruits for the New Black Panthers, Shabazz is plugging in to certain frustrations. The tensions between blacks and whites wrought by gentrification and neighborhood change are often palpable, and the skirmish last year over parking space in Shaw was a keen example. Residents of the neighborhood filed a civil complaint against the Metropolitan Baptist Church for using a D.C. Public Schools–owned field adjacent to Garrison Elementary School as a parking lot on Sunday, rendering the field unusable as a ballfield. The church, in the 1200 block of R Street NW, caters to mostly African-American parishioners from suburban Maryland, and its members had been parking their cars on the lot for nearly a generation. The church's opponents in the field controversy were led by whites.
It looked to a lot of people as if the area's new white residents were trying to muscle out the church, a 125-year-old Washington institution with 600 congregants. The Rev. H. Beecher Hicks Jr., Metropolitan's pastor, was quick to identify the conflict in terms of race. As the dispute heated up in the courts, he unexpectedly called an end to the fighting. He told his members to stop parking on the field and announced that Metropolitan no longer had a home in the neighborhood. He soon announced plans to relocate the church.

From his pulpit, Hicks said: "I refuse to let racism make me a racist. I refuse to let those who hate me cause me to hate them," according to the Washington Post. A few months later, at a forum with the mayor last spring, Hicks issued Williams a warning: "Unless we do something to lessen the conflict between whites and blacks...who are not learning to live with each other, we are doomed for some severe conflict within our own community," according to the Post.

If the mayor heard the message, so did Shabazz. A few months later, he started organizing the New Black Panthers in Washington. And when he's asked to describe what motivates his movement, Shabazz always brings up the Shaw parking battle as an example of the perils facing D.C.'s black community.

As for the mayor's take on the Panthers, his spokesperson, Peggy Armstrong, says the group is too new to assess. "They haven't been on the radar screen long enough to comment one way or another," she says. "We don't know if they are a significant force yet."

"The black population is rapidly decreasing in Washington, D.C.!" Roach's voice resonates from a white megaphone. It is six weeks since she became a Panther, and she's an old hand at this now, pacing in a black beret and black quasi-military outfit in front of an abandoned, trash-filled lot at the corner of 8th and H Streets NE. "Chocolate City is on the verge of complete elimination!"

It's a brisk Saturday afternoon in November, and the sky is gum-ball blue. Behind Roach, the rest of the District's New Black Panthers are holding themselves at attention, ready to fan out along the H Street corridor, a venerable but run-down stretch of businesses that cater to the largely African-American neighborhood. The group of 18 makes a formidable appearance, standing arm's length apart. Knots of onlookers at the bus stop and the other adjacent street corners watch the Panthers and Roach, who has begun reciting the party's "Seven Steps to Saving Our Black City."

"We need to support black businesses," Roach announces, ticking off the measures. "We need to stop throwing trash in the streets! We need to respect the elderly! Don't sell your homes to nonblacks! Stop all black-on-black crime and violence! Black men respect our women and raise our youth! Know your legal rights and stay out of the slave-master's jail!"

Shabazz, meanwhile, faces the line of Panthers and issues them orders for today's outreach and fundraising effort. Today, Shabazz is wearing a black double-breasted suit with shadow stripes, a black shirt, black tie, and a large gray fedora. For the next few hours, some people along H Street will mistake the Panthers for the Guardian Angels—which clearly bugs Shabazz. The misperception may come from the berets and the fact that the Panthers are handing out "WARNING!" fliers as they ask strangers for donations. They drop the money into black plastic buckets. Where is this money going? The Panthers say it's to help build a headquarters and to support a food and clothing drive they are planning.

Once she runs through the flier's seven points, Roach begins ad-libbing: "Throughout the community, they're trying to replace black people with rich white people. Come and hear the truth to save our black community. We need to have faith and save our community. There's too much violence in our community. They would like for us to kill one another, for us to get rid of each other. In five to 10 years, this street will not be as it is today. Black brothers and sisters will not walk around freely as they do today...."

Dexter Johnson, a 35-year-old black man in a brown leather bomber jacket and eyeglasses, listens to Roach with evident interest. "I think it's good," he says. "Before, Georgetown was black. Whites came in and bought up the homes. Now, older blacks are saying, ‘I shouldn't have sold.' We need organizations like this to bring our community together. Whites, Chinese, Orientals are together. We aren't, because we've been divided since slavery. It's happening. You look around and you see whites."

A few minutes later, the Panthers are crossing the street, with Shabazz chanting, "Black Power!" and the group echoing it right back to him. They stop at a stuccoed shopping center on H Street where Joy, a member who declines to give her last name, leads two others on an expedition for donations. She is carrying a bucket and a stack of fliers.

Joy is a stick-thin woman with long dreadlocks cascading down from under her beret. She has a purposeful walk, and she swings her hips with the sort of exaggeration you might expect from an aspiring runway model. She, like many Panthers, is nice to me. She bothers to point out when the laces of my shoes are untied and asks if I'm cold, or just how I'm doing.

Then, she saunters into Freddy's Subs & Fries, which is, despite its name, a fried-chicken joint, and she glides past the line of customers, who are all black, toward the counter, behind which an Asian man is taking orders.

"Hello, my queen, how are you? Hello, my brother, how are you?" she says to the black patrons with a smile as she makes her way forward. The man behind the counter looks past Joy, gazing directly at the customer at the front of the line.

"Yes?" he says to the customer.

"Would you like to give a donation?" Joy interjects.

The counter man continues looking past her.

"Would you like to give a donation?" she repeats. "All you have in here is black people. American black people. Would you like to give something?"

He continues ignoring her.

"No?" she asks.

Finally, he says: "My manager outside."

The people in line start laughing and talking among themselves. One woman says, "He knows what she's saying."

"Mr. Korean, sir. Do you want these people to pay for their food?" Joy prods. To no one in particular she says: "He understands what I'm saying. All you have in here is black people. He understands pretty well. I'm not going to beg him."

Then, with the bucket hanging from her arm, she walks out of the store and up to Shabazz. "Brother Shabazz," Joy says, "all they have is black people in the store, and he wouldn't give any money."

"I'll show you how to do that," Shabazz retorts, and he marches into Freddy's, followed by Joy and two other members. Looking at the people in line, he says: "Hello, my brothers and sisters. This is the New Black Panther Party—"

"Oh," a woman waiting interrupts, "you're not collecting for a party? I thought all this was for a dancing party."

"No," Shabazz booms impatiently. Then he gathers the three other Panthers into a huddle. "Black Power!" they start chanting, "Black Power! Black Power! Black Power!"

After getting sufficiently motivated, Shabazz walks up to the counter. "How are you doing?" he says to the counter man. "We're trying to clean up the neighborhood. Can we get some help? We're here trying to feed 1,000 people." At that, the man hands Shabazz some cash.

Almost immediately, Joy exclaims to me with triumph: "He gave him money! He gave it to him!"
The scene nearly repeats itself at New York Fashions, a clothing store next door to Freddy's Subs, although the Asian woman inside defies Shabazz to the end.

"Would you like to give a small donation?" Shabazz asks the worker, who is wearing glasses and has short, curly, red-colored hair. "We really need you to give back to the community that supports you."

"No one supports me," she says, raising her voice. "I'm just trying to make a living, and you disrespect me."

"I'm not trying to—" Shabazz replies.

"I have a certain budget—" the woman says.

"I'm not trying to show you disrespect," Shabazz interrupts, "but I'm asking for a donation, just a donation—"

"That's not what you say."

"Look," Shabazz says, "there are many of your kind here that are taking wagon-loads of money out of our community and giving nothing back."

"I'm working here, and I'm trying to make a living," the woman insists.

"Are you going to give us money or not?" Shabazz says. "I don't have time to argue about this."

The woman busies herself behind the counter without responding.

"Then we'll be back and boycott this place. We're going to grind that cash register to a halt. To a halt. Mark my words."

"Now you're not asking me," she says. "You're threatening me."

"I'm asking you nicely," Shabazz says finally. "Are you going to help me?"

Silence.

"Thanks," Shabazz says, walking out of the store. "We'll be back to boycott you. We'll be back to grind that cash register to a halt. We'll be back to stop the bloodsuckers of our community."

Outside, Shabazz instructs Chris Stewart, a short young man with unruly sideburns, to "put them on our list."

"You've got to take note of everybody that robs and sucks the blood of your community and hold them accountable," Stewart says as he jots "New York Fashions" into a notebook, which will be used later, I'm told, to guide the Panthers' boycott of Korean-owned stores.

Weeks later, however, the store manager reports that the Panthers have never returned.

Malik Zulu Shabazz (born Paris Lewis) is tall, about 6-foot-2, charming, reflective, and even rather gentle. You may develop a different impression of Shabazz, of course, if you catch him when he's calling Korean-Americans "bloodsuckers" or white people "slave-masters." But if you set aside the demagoguery, Shabazz comes across as a likable guy, with warm brown eyes and a generous laugh.
 He's a great dresser.

My first encounter with Shabazz's Panthers begins on a cool October evening at Howard University. The Panthers are sponsoring a panel discussion at the campus's Founders Library. When I arrive at the library, though, I find two security officers standing guard at the entrance, turning people away. The group hadn't secured the room for the event, I am told.

Apparently, given the Panthers' already burgeoning reputation and Shabazz's history as an inflammatory student at Howard, it isn't going to be easy for the group to host get-togethers at the university. Standing outside the building in the dark, Brandi Brown, the 18-year-old Howard freshman and newly minted Panther member who organized the discussion, is obviously disappointed. The event was supposed to be a rather benign talk on male-female relations in the black community. "We're going to have to reschedule it," Brown says.

Every Sunday, the Panthers convene a routine public meeting in a small grocery store on H Street NE. It's a gathering that the members publicize by word of mouth and on fliers. "Join the Black Power movement," they implore people. A few days after the failed Howard event, I decide to check one of the meetings out.

I enter Ahmed's Market at 2:30 p.m., the time the meeting is scheduled to begin. About a dozen people are milling about somewhere in between the potato chips stand and the metal juice maker. Most are wearing the Panthers' standard outfit—black parachute pants, black shirt, and black headgear, more often than not a beret.

There are a dozen or so plastic chairs running up the middle aisle of Ahmed's to a microphone, and I begin to make my way to a seat. But before I can get there, I am approached by Stewart, who wants to know how in the world I found out about the event. I explain that I saw one of the fliers, and to prove it, I show him a copy. With that, almost as if I have just uttered the wrong password, he asks me to go wait outside on the sidewalk.

As I stand there on the practically deserted street, I can hear what is happening during the proceedings; the Panthers have deposited two speakers on the sidewalk, from which they blare the goings-on inside. Presumably, the idea behind the outdoor speakers is to lure passers-by into the store to see what all the hubbub is about, although I don't think it's working. There is no one else around.

"Black Power!" a female speaker yells into the microphone. "Black Power!" the attendees reply.

After 20 minutes of call-and-response, ("Black Power! Black Power! I am great! I am great!"), Shabazz emerges from the store. He is wearing a beret and a black suit. This is our first in-person encounter, and he strides into the sunlight gracefully, pointedly avoiding eye contact. He turns on his heel away from me and begins walking down the street. As he moves away, however, he begins quietly speaking to me, so, naturally and gamely, I follow. We stroll down the street together, and I explain why I'm there—to learn more about the Panthers. He listens and then tells me I have to leave.

"You can't stay," Shabazz says firmly. "The party does not allow Caucasians to witness their meetings."

The nexus between Shabazz and the New Black Panthers lies with Khallid Abdul Muhammad, the notorious anti-Semite and black supremacist. Four years ago, Muhammad started the New Black Panther Party for Self Defense in New York. Muhammad was looking around for a political group with which to affiliate, and revivifying the Panthers—arguably the most prominent black militant organization during its heyday in the late '60s and early '70s—seemed a good enough idea.

The original Black Panther Party for Self Defense was started by Huey Newton and Bobby Seale in October 1966. The party sought racial equity and advocated a 10-point program that included fighting for full employment and an end to police brutality. Members wore all-black outfits and often armed themselves with rifles. The underpinnings of the Black Panthers were Malcolm X's teachings and the black-is-beautiful movement. Party members touted self-reliance and direct confrontation.

Unlike moderate civil rights groups, the Panthers advocated active self-defense in the face of police aggression; their philosophy was viewed, by some, as an antidote to the mainstream approach adopted by Martin Luther King Jr. The group grew significantly after Newton was arrested and convicted for the 1967 murder of a police officer. The Panthers ran "Free Huey" protests. In 1970, Newton's conviction was overturned because of procedural errors during his trial. By then, the Panthers were a major political force, with chapters nationwide, coffers filled with cash, and a stash of weapons.

With racial conflicts, protests, and riots simmering across the country, the FBI largely blamed the Panthers. The police made attempts to infiltrate the group with undercover officers. In 1973, Seale ran for mayor of Oakland, Calif. He lost but received almost 40 percent of the vote. From 1974 to 1977, Elaine Brown ran the organization. Soon after, the Panthers all but folded as they endured external attacks, legal challenges, and internal divisions.

Muhammad hasn't made much of the revivified party as of yet, although Shabazz says there are about 80 chapters in various cities nationwide. Muhammad has instead done a superior job of promoting himself. In 1993, he burst on the scene as the national spokesman for Farrakhan, giving an inflammatory speech at New Jersey's Keane College. In his remarks, Muhammad labeled Jews the "bloodsuckers" of the black community, branded the pope a "no-good cracker," and called on black South Africans to kill whites.

After months of public pressure, Farrakhan fired Muhammad. At the same time, however, Muhammad became a hero to extremists, a speak-truth-to-power kind of guy. None were more impressed than a 27-year-old Howard University Law School student and campus activist named Malik Zulu Shabazz.
Shabazz, as an undergraduate at Howard a few years earlier, had started Unity Nation, a Nation of Islam offshoot, and he was still the group's president. Unity Nation was known for attracting high-profile speakers and antagonizing Asian-run businesses. In addition to bringing a solid roster of rhetoricians to campus, Shabazz led university buy-black campaigns, which he dubbed "Black Fridays."
Shabazz wasted no time in inviting Muhammad to speak at the school. And as soon as the event was set for Feb. 23, 1994, a swarm of media attention followed, and the university was put on high alert. Muhammad drew a standing-room-only crowd, yet his speech turned out to be relatively tame. Shabazz, on the other hand, detonated a set of explosive messages.
Shabazz led the audience in an anti-Semitic refrain. News video of the speech shows that he proffered a series of questions, to which he had instructed the crowd to respond, "Jews."
Shabazz: "Who is it that controls the media and Hollywood in America?"
Crowd: "Jews!"
Shabazz: "Who is it that has our entertainers in a vise grip and our athletes in their vise grip?"
Crowd: "Jews!"
Shabazz: "Who is it that has been spying on black leaders and spying on Martin Luther King and set up his death?"
Crowd: "Jews!"
äShabazz was roundly assailed for this performance, but just as it had done for his mentor, Muhammad, all the negative attention had a positive effect: Shabazz was suddenly noticed, and he became an established black demagogue. Washington Post columnist Richard Cohen helped make Shabazz a man of lasting celebrity by deriding the rabble-rouser a few times in his space.

That same year, Barry was re-elected mayor. In the election, part of his public resurrection following his crack-cocaine bust, Barry ran as a reborn black father figure. Shabazz was drawn to his cause, and, as it happened, the young firebrand could be seen onstage behind the mayor the night of Barry's victory speech in the primary.

In his Sept. 15, 1994, column, Cohen outed Shabazz. "Looming behind the former mayor as he declared his victory was a tall Howard University law student, Malik Zulu Shabazz," Cohen wrote. "He is the head of a minuscule campus organization which twice this year mounted campus hate rallies."
Running for political cover, Barry within days publicly slammed the law student in largely white Ward 3. "There is a young man hanging onto my camp, Malik Shabazz, I've been trying to get out of the way for a long time," Barry said.

These were tough words for Shabazz to hear, he says now, while we're sitting in the back of Ben's Chili Bowl on U Street NW ("Black owned and operated since 1958") one Friday afternoon. Sure, the experience taught him something about the expedient nature of politicians. But more important, it revealed—in Shabazz's mind at least—the extent to which whites in the city had come to control D.C.'s leaders. Now, Shabazz concluded, blacks seeking power had to court and win over the white constituency if they wanted to rule.

"After Richard Cohen attacked me," Shabazz says, "Marion Barry went to Ward 3 and denounced me in five minutes. He denounced me to people who didn't support him." Barry, for his part, now refuses to comment on Shabazz or the New Black Panther Party.

Shabazz speaks dryly about the former mayor. "Marion absolutely fell victim to the conspiracy," he says.

After his falling out with Barry, Shabazz ran for the D.C. Council in 1995 and 1998 as an independent. The Rev. Al Sharpton campaigned on his behalf. Still, he lost badly both times. Since 1998, he has been working as a lawyer, mostly on discrimination cases.

One of his clients has been Muhammad, who has been a source of controversy in New York as the organizer of three Million Youth Marches in Harlem. Shabazz has, among other things, acted as Muhammad's spokesperson for the marches. And it was under Muhammad's direction that Shabazz began organizing a chapter of the New Black Panthers in D.C. last year, just in time for Farrakhan's Million Family March. During that rally on the National Mall, both Shabazz and Muhammad were prominent speakers.

Nine days after the Panthers visit the Asian store clerks on H Street, they're at it again. In front of A-1 Grocery, a Korean-owned market near the Maryland border on Division Street NE, a demonstration involving Panther members and neighborhood residents is brewing.

A few days earlier, according to D.C. police, three African-American teenage girls cut school and entered A-1 Grocery. They milled about until one began walking out without paying the full amount for a 65-cent ice cream cone. A fracas between the owner and the girls ensued. The Panthers say the owner attacked the girls with a paddle and locks. The owner says the girls and some of their friends attacked him. Two of the girls went to the hospital to treat their injuries.

(Ultimately, the Metropolitan Police Department recommended that the U.S. attorney not prosecute the case, saying the videotape of the brawl was inconclusive.)

Shabazz heard about the incident from an advisory neighborhood commissioner, and today, Nov. 27, he has brought the Black Panthers to lead a demonstration against the store on the girls' behalf. Television crews and newspaper reporters have followed.

Stewart, who is now being called the Panthers' field marshal, has the megaphone, and he energizes the crowd, which is almost 50 strong and four rows deep. Several are holding signs that read, "Shut Em' Down!"

As Stewart chants, the crowd echoes his every word. "Death to these bloodsuckers!" he hollers. "Shut 'em down!...No respect!...No business!...No respect!...No business!"

The media-savvy Shabazz does everything possible to make the most of the media interest. When the camera crews close in, Shabazz whispers to his lieutenants, who whip the crowd into a lather. When asked, Shabazz produces the teenagers for interviews.

As the cold afternoon fades into a frigid evening, the Panthers and the locals continue their demonstration. Panther members declare, "Death to the yellow slave-master!" and they shoo prospective A-1 customers away. All the while, the police orbit the area to make sure nothing gets out of hand, and the evening of protests along this blighted block—which is also home to two liquor stores and a Chinese takeout—ends on a high note for the Panthers. They have found a juicy issue to capitalize on, and they're getting reels of attention.

Three days later, things do get out of hand. The protests and boycott have continued, though not at the same intensity. But sometime on the night of Nov. 30, a pipe bomb is detonated outside the store, which is also spray-painted with ethnic slurs and these words: "Burn them down, Shut them down, Black Power!"

Shabazz says the Panthers had nothing to do with the attack. But it doesn't matter; his group's agenda is discussed because of it. Radio talk shows and editorial pages begin weighing in on a citywide conflict between Asians and blacks. Water cooler conversation around the city homes in on the subject. Most important, the Panthers' membership grows—to about 60 people, according to some of its leaders.

After a few days, Shabazz ends the protest and boycott when the girls and the store owner agree to try to settle the dispute on their own.

"He has a constituency," says Sang Park, the attorney for the Korean American Grocers Association, who has been meeting with Shabazz to try to broker peace between his group and the black community. "People follow him. We realized this after the A-1 Grocery store matter."

Tiffany Ford is a small, tired-looking 20-year-old, with thick-as-a-thumb eyeglasses and tight tapered jeans. She works at Giant, has a 1-year-old daughter, lives in Southeast, and can't stand how blacks are faring these days. As we listen to Shabazz, on H Street NE, talk about her people's problems, she hears things I don't.

While Shabazz is expostulating on the demise of Chocolate City and the white takeover, here's what Ford observes: "Everything they're saying is the truth. We need to keep our community strong. Why are so many black people in jail? Why do women have babies that they don't want to have? I don't get it. It's terrible the way things are going. I'm a young black woman, and I got a young black daughter. I'd do anything for my daughter. But I wouldn't break the law. I work at Giant, and I work my butt off. It's happening. Everything they are saying is right."

Shabazz isn't talking about out-of-wedlock births or the number of black people in jail. Yet Ford interprets it that way. It's something Walters pointed out: People often hear what they want to. He also notes that I, as a white man, may not always understand the subtleties of black militant oratory.
I ask about a fundamental point Shabazz is clearly making: Does she agree with the idea that blacks should never sell their homes to whites?

"Well, I'm not a racist," Ford says. "I don't know about that. In some instances, people do try to take advantage of black people." She pauses, and then adds: "But black people take advantage of black people, too. It's a two-way street."

Would she join the Panthers?

"No," she says. "I don't have the time."

Shabazz uses muscular rhetoric in complex ways. His words are, at once, comforting and stirring. What's more, like his mentors Farrakhan and Muhammad, he knows how to keep himself relevant to his audience.

"There's a leadership transformation in the black community here," says Donald Temple, an activist attorney associated with black causes who shared the podium with Shabazz at the September Black Panther rally. "The old guard's getting older, and a new gýoup is coming in. Shabazz, for good, bad, or ugly, represents a certain segment of the black-empowerment movement. He has a constituency, he's active, and he's committed. He is going to be raising issues that afflict the black community. And that is good."

With the New Black Panthers, Shabazz has clearly found at least a few people willing to make the Panthers' cause their life's work.

"I can absolutely do more for black people as the leader of this organization than I could if I were an elected official," Shabazz says. "I don't know if the city is entirely ready for a talk about black power. But I'm much more effective this way. I do have influence over people in the city, believe me." CP


Copyright © 2001 Washington Free Weekly Inc.