Greens

Micronesia from Spike EP on Vimeo.
The United States went around in the 1990s with a policy of inventing completely new countries to lobby for a Global Carbon Tax in the UN (and vote with Israel) by stacking the General Assembly with tiny Pacific Island Nations.

The Global Carbon Tax caucus in the UN is the governments of the Maldives, Vanatu, Pilau, Tuvalu, the Marshall Islands and the Federated Republic of Micronesia.

Cold Fusion and The Deconstructionist Attack on Science and Language from Spike EP on Vimeo.
Here's the big news in conservation, energy and sustainable development : Cold Fusion works.

And the Americans are REFUSING to develop it, because it will destroy the oil, coal and nuclear industry.

If the so-called Green Party actually care about these things (and its not just posturing), why aren't they demanding an immediate crash program to develop Cold Fusion energy sources and High Energy Physics...?

This is known to everyone who does their research and keeps pace with these things. 

Oliver Stone even made it the plot of Wall Street 2 and Gordon Gekko destroys his own firm by pulling the plug when he looks at their model for Cold Fusion and says "My God, it's going to work - what about all my oil futures?"

https://vimeo.com/111254495

The Green Party and all radical environmentalists are not interested in sustainable development - they want NO development, deindustrialisation and degrowth, and they HATE the working classes and seek to exterminate and emiserate them.

Instead of looking on something like Clean Coal burning power stations as a technological triumph over the challenge of pollution, they support the wholesale destruction of the British Coal Industry and the destruction of literally thousand of communities in the North, Midlands, Wales and Scotland, along with their complete social and ecconomic breakdown as a wonderful thing.

They pretended that all those coal fired power stations were going to be replaced with windmills - well, they weren't. They just began importing coal from China and India and built more nuclear power stations.

The "Fossil Fuel" hypothesis isn't backed up by science - only money.

The abiotic production of petroleum as an ongoing, natural geological process is backed up by manifest reality and observable fact.

The scientific and intellectual bankruptcy of the Peak Oil scam is belied by the fact that OPEC currently have Price-Fixed the price of Brent Crude so LOW that 80% of their member-States are unable to break even and running at a loss. Even Saudi Arabia!

The Saudis are SO desperate in their efforts to wage ecconomic warfare against Iran and Russia, they are courting bankruptcy for themselves and all their neighbours.

And no-one ever says "Hmm, maybe those "illegal" "ISIS" oil-production facilities in Syria, Libya and Northern Iraq are over-producing and creating a market glut - maybe we should impose sanctions on the people illegally buying their stolen oil...?"

By "Frauds and Charlatans", you mean "Chemists".

It doesn't violate any of the laws of physics, only the professional pride of physicists.

And what's wrong with alchemy anyway? 

This is the entire problem with materialism and the formalism of the Academy in the Anglo-American sphere - current theory says that it does not work and that it cannot work, and so when you see that it DOES work, instead of throwing out your theories and abandoning your preconceptions to come up with a NEW theory that conforms to reality, you say "This is unscientific, so it can't work - this is a fraud".

Which is EXACTLY what happened with Cold Fusion in 1989-1990, the precursor to the Persian Gulf War - the Bush Administration used taxpayer-funded officials to go in and fabricate results demonstrating that the original experiment was non-reproducible and therefore Cold Fusion was a fraud;

What you say makes no sense - if it violates the laws of physics (which it doesn't), why would it matter if it "transcends our current scientific capabilities" - are you contending that human beings, sufficiently technologically advanced, can violate the laws of physics at will?

You need to pick a position and stick to it - either it violates the laws of physics or it doesn't.

And if it does violate the laws of physics, then it isn't a law, and needs to be thrown out.

It's more likely that there are a number of people dedicated to destroying this knowledge every time a man discovers it in his garage.

This is the lesson of history.

Look at General Motors and the Tram system in the United States. 

Look at the Electric Car. 

Look at solar.

When did "Theory" become "Law"?

Around about the time of Isaac Newton, I believe.

(Who was a lifelong and sincere alchemist, by the way - so your Attack on Alchemy is totally fallacious)

And clearly, you CAN do it at room temperature.

The production of excess heat demonstrates that there is more energy being output by these cells than is being put in - that isn't a chemical process, so it has to be a nuclear process.

And there are really only two options - if it was fission, I wager someone might have noticed...

That's Stuckard's interpretation of Alchemy - the strictly allegorical.

That it CLAIMS to be real, but cannot actually possibly be so.

But we know that transmutation of elements occurs all the time in Fission and Fusion reactions - so where does that leave the materialist view of alchemy now...?

If the Green Party EVER lent its support to Real Economic Development with investment in High Energy Physics and other crash programs, I MIGHT come to believe that they were not actually completely full of sh*t.

As it is....

 http://coldfusionnow.org

The BBC - Q : What do you see as the biggest challenges in conservation?

A : The Growing Human Population.

The BBC - Q : And do you have ideas about what ought to be done about that...?

A : Can't you guess...?

The BBC : Durgh...

https://vimeo.com/96695177

And being accused of Nazi sympathies by the Hollande and the Vichysoisse of the French State - I'm sorry, can we have a reality check here, please?

The French deported Jews to Auschwitz and fully collaborated with the Third Reich - they are in NO position to be throwing stones on this question.

That's a French policeman, guarding a French concentration camp in France, containing French Jews, gypsies and Communists - any questions..?

Greenpeace have been committing acts of sabotage, terrorism and piracy on the high seas against State Agencies of the Russian Federation - last time I checked, that was an act of war.

I don't want to be in a war with Russia.

For some reason they have decided that GazProm drilling for oil in the far-polar North of the Arctic Sea is the most urgency ecological crisis in the world today - as opposed to, say, the Tar Sands Canada-US Oil pipeline, which probably IS. They are taking no direct action against that - they sail all the way from Canada to polar international waters to attack Russian oil rigs.

I wasn't the one who invoked Godwins Law, here.

I was falsely/implicitly accused of sympathising with a "Nazi-lover" (which isn't true, or accurate), and that does not stand.

Hitler, by the way, was an extremely enthusiastic environmentalist.

The Green movement (especially in Germany) came directly out of the eugenics movement - this is where you get this whole insane idea that no species should ever be allowed to go extinct, and if it does, it HAS to be because mankind made it so, replacing Natural Selection with Anthropogenic or Unnatural Selection - the Panda will not go extinct because we (humans) do not wish it.

The UNESCO Charter in 1946 by Thomas Huxley openly commits the organisation to an agenda of the actively (and explicitly covert) agenda of Eugenics.

The U.S. actually went around inventing entirely new countries that conceptually would be the most at-risk and under threat by the rising sea levels supposedly implicit in the next 20 years of global warming, to lobby the UN.

If you have ever wondered what is remarkable about the soverign nation states of Tuvalu, Vanatu, Pillau, the Marshall Islands and the Federated Republic of Micronesia, it's two things - Firstly, they were the only nations along with the U.S. and Israel to vote opposing the annual resolution in the UN calling for a peaceful settlement of the Israel-Palestine conflict based on the pre-1967 borders, but they are also the leading lobbyists for the adoption of the Kyoto Accords in the UN.

They are the UN equivalent of Rotten Boroughs.