The Bilderbergers: Denis Healy

Q: "Isn't that is some way a conspiracy...?"

A: "Oh, come off it, Dear boy....! 

Look, you 'get on' at the BBC because you suck up to the people who say 'Let's go and talk to Denis Healy... 

This use of the phrase "to get on" as a verb is an explicit reference to the reality of Masonic nepotism within the BBC and other great establishment institutions. 

"But that is the world... 

That is the way it happens in the world, and quite rightly so. 

And what's wrong with that...?"

'Uniting the West' - by Denis Healey (extract)

From his autobiography 'The Time of My Life'.  Published by Penguin, 1989.

[Talking about contradictions in the post-war Labour party]

Before long a benign providence developed another mechanism for assisting impecunious European socialists to learn something of the outside world - the international conference.  

Konigswinter performed this function for Germany. 

The Council of Europe covered Western Europe as a whole.  

The NATO Parliamentarians Conference brought politicians from Europe, the United States, and Canada together once a year.  

Before long there was also an annual meeting in Bermuda of British MP's and members of Congress. 

Then the great American foundations of Ford and Rockefeller took a hand.  

There was a proliferation of cultural conferences in all parts of the world, including the Congress for Cultural Freedom, where I could meet people less directly involved in politics such as the poet Stephen Spender, the philosopher Raymond Aron, and the novelist Mary McCarthy. 

I later discovered that the Congress for Cultural Freedom, like Encounter magazine, was financed by the CIA; both nevertheless made a useful contribution to the quality of Western life at that time.

Of all these meetings, the most valuable to me while I was in opposition were the Bilderberg Conferences - so called after the Bilderberg Hotel near Arnhem, where the first was held in 1954.  

They were the brain-child of Joseph Retinger, a Pole who had settled in England after the Great War, married the daughter of the socialist intellectual, E.D. Morel, and worked as a secretary to Joseph Conrad, another Polish ex-patriate.

Retinger was a small wizened man, with a pince-nez on a wrinkled brown face.  He was crippled by polio. During the war he had been an aide to General Sikorski, and despite his extreme physical disability was parachuted into Poland to make contact with the Home Army.  After the war he organised the Congress of the Hague, which launched the European Movement.  

Convinced of the need for a similar forum to strengthen unity between Europe and North America, he approached Hugh Gaitskell, General Colin Gubbins, who had commanded SOE during the war, and several leading politicians and businessmen who were concerned to strengthen Atlantic cooperation.  

They asked Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands to act as Chairman, because they rightly thought it would be difficult to find a politician whose objectivity would be above suspicion, and who could call Cabinet ministers from any country to order without causing offence.

I was invited to the first meeting and later acted as convener of the British who attended; 

Reggie Maudling and I were the British members of the Steering Committee.  

Retinger and his successor, the Dutch Socialist Ernst van der Beughel, who later became Chairman of KLM, were extraordinarily successful in persuading busy men to give up a weekend for private discussions, though they found it more difficult to attract ministers than politicians out of office.

The Bilderberg conferences inevitably aroused jealousy, because they were exclusive, and suspicion, because they were private. 

In America they were attacked as a left-wing plot to subvert the United States, in Europe as a capitalist plot to undermine socialism

They were neither.  

Immense care was taken to invite a fair balance from all political parties, and to include trade unionists as well as businessmen.

Though the discussions were more carefully prepared than at many such meetings - I myself wrote a paper for most conferences - their real value, as always, was in the personal contacts made outside the conference hall.  

Industrialists like Gianni Agnelli and Otto Wolf von Amerongen had to listen to socialists and trade unionists - and vice versa.  Experience has taught me that lack of understanding is the main cause of all evil in public affairs - as in private life.  

Nothing is more likely to produce understanding than the sort of personal contact which involves people not just as officials or representatives, but also as human beings.  That is why the Commonwealth Scholarships, which bring students from America and the Commonwealth to Britain, have made a contribution to good relations between the Anglo-Saxon democracies out of all proportion to their cost.

Secret Ruler of the World, Bilderberg from Paul Coker on Vimeo.

Denis Winston Healey

Born: 30-Aug-1917

Birthplace: Mottingham, Kent, England

Gender: Male

Race or Ethnicity: White

Sexual orientation: Straight

Occupation: Politician

Nationality: England

Executive summary: Chancellor of the Exchequer, 1974-79

Military service: British Army (Royal Engineers, WWII, Maj., North Africa, Italy)

Wife: Edna May Edmunds (m. 21-Dec-1945, three children)

    High School: Bradford Grammar School

    University: Balliol College, Oxford University

    Chancellor of the Exchequer (1974-79)

    UK Secretary of State for Defence (1964-70)

    UK Member of Parliament for Leeds East (1955-92)

    UK Member of Parliament for Leeds South East (1952-55)

    Communist Party (1937-39)

    Labour Party (UK) Deputy Leader (1980-83)

    Member of the British Empire 

    Life Peerage 29-Jun-1992 as Baron Healey of Riddlesden

Author of books:

Time of My Life (1989, memoir)

When Shrimps Learn to Whistle (1990)

Denis Healey's Yorkshire Dales (1995)

Healey's World (2002)

Tony Benn's Diary - September 30th 1976 - Labour vs the IMF Bankers from Paul Coker on Vimeo.

Mr Denis Healy, MP - Bilderberg Group, Steering Committee; Founder, Charter Member

"They have NO success stories - you DO NOT WANT TO BE IN DEBT TO THESE PEOPLE..." - 

Webster G.Tarpley on the IMF

Denis Healy and the Arms Trade: Bakshi and Influence Peddling by BCAP from Paul Coker on Vimeo.

BCAP = British Commonwealth in the Arabian Peninsula.

See also: 

AQAP (Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula)

NWOAP ( New World Order in the Arabian Peninsula)

Martin Bormann, Nazi In Exile by Paul Manning (1981)

Nazi finance & continuity network - rare book about Hitler's No. 2 whose death was faked in 1972 

A decisively powerful network of corporate entities run by hardened SS veterans, the Bormann group constitutes what one veteran banker termed “the greatest concentration of money power under a single control in history.” 

The foundation of the organization’s clout is money—lots and lots of money. 

Controlling German big business and, through investments, much of the rest of the world’s economy, the organization was the repository for the stolen wealth of Europe, estimated by British intelligence to have totaled more than $180 billion by the end of 1943 (not including the money taken from Greece and the former Soviet Union, nor that taken after 1943.) 

This organization literally constitutes a postwar “Underground Reich” witha governing hierarchy composed of the sons and daughters of SS men, holding military ranks and titles from the Third Reich.

Boston: The Real Bomb

‘Suspicious’ fire at Kennedy Library remains under investigation

By Bill Forry
Apr. 17, 2013

Probe continues into Monday fire: Another view of the damage to the JFK Library. Photo by Bill Forry

Did a fast-moving fire at the John F. Kennedy Library and Museum— which erupted around 3 p.m. Monday afternoon— have any connection to the deadly bomb attacks on Boylston Street that took place just minutes before?

It’s a question to which no definitive answer has been given at this point, but federal and local investigators continue to scour the presidential library for clues, even as much of the nation’s attention remains fixed on the carnage in the Back Bay.

The blaze, which scorched the library’s archival wing and caused significant damage to the structure, is being called “suspicious” by city government sources, who have been pressed to talk about a possible connection to the terror attack.

“It’s a suspicious fire with a particularly strong accelerant,” said one person briefed about the investigation within city government. “Police and fire are not ready to declare that the fire and the bombings are unrelated. Given the timing and the intensity of the fire, it's suspicious.”

JFK Library damage: A closer look.

The fire at the Columbia Point landmark burst out around 3 p.m. and prompted a swift response from Boston Fire crews, which quickly extinguished the blaze. The fire damaged a newer section of the building that is not close to the library’s main exhibit halls and not frequented by tourists. No one was hurt and visitors to the museum were evacuated in an orderly fashion. Eventually, buses were brought in to escort visitors away from the scene.

At the scene of the fire, Reporter staff observed fire crews and interviewed eyewitnesses who gave conflicting information about what they had seen and heard.

Tom Putnam, the director of the JFK Library, said that the incident seemed to have begun in a mechanical room near the archive section of the library. When asked, Putnam said that he did not think a “device” had been used.

Paul Yazbeck, a JFK Library employee, said he saw a small fire and heard what he defined as “definitely an explosion.”

Other people, who were there to tour the library, said they had not heard an explosion.

On Monday afternoon, in the immediate aftermath of the Back Bay attacks, Boston Police Commissioner Edward Davis fueled speculation that the library had indeed been targeted as part of a wider plot when he included the incident as one of three he discussed at a press conference. Almost immediately, Boston Police officials began de-emphasizing the JFK Library fire in Tweets and other statements.

At the day’s second press conference, Davis clarified his earlier statement, saying that reports that it was connected to the marathon explosions "could be premature" and "may not be linked directly" to the Copley Square incidents.

Davis added that the JFK incident was either a fire or "an incendiary device."

On Monday, the Twitter account for the National Archives, which owns the JFK Library, seemed to reinforce the notion that the fire was not connected to the downtown attacks: "Fire at @JFKLibrary today. All people are safe. Fire investigation underway. No info on damage yet. Any tie-in is speculation."

At a Monday press conference with Gov. Deval Patrick, Davis was asked about any victims at the JFK Library incident. "None that we know of," he said.

By Tuesday morning, Gov. Patrick emphasized that there were two— and only two— bombs involved in the Monday incidents. There was no mention of the Kennedy Library at a morning press conference and reporters did not ask about the incident, focusing all attention on the investigation into the deadly blasts in town.

Rachel Flor, the director of communications for the JFK Library, said on Wednesday that the library hoped to have further information about the cause of the fire soon. The library, she said, would remain closed until further notice as the investigation continued. 

She said that there “minimal damage” to the library’s collection, but added that there was "significant" damage to the archival wing, which was attached to the original library building in 2011.

NSA: Forget the B.S. stories about Snowden

"I can't allow the US Government to destroy privacy and basic liberties"

And yet he goes it work for the National Security Agency

- who do literally nothing else...

On the same day that Qusayr fell, the British and French governments hysterically demanded that Obama undertake a total bombing campaign against Syria, whatever the consequences in regard to Russia and other powers. To his credit, Obama is continuing to say no to this lunatic Anglo-French neocolonial adventure. 

On that same June 5, the London-based daily The Guardian, in an article by the expatriate American Glenn Greenwald, hyped a court order from the secret FISA panel of federal judges showing that the US National Security Agency was routinely monitoring the telephone records (including time, locations, call duration, and unique identifiers, but not the contents of the conversations) of possibly unlimited millions of Verizon phone subscribers. Back in the US, reactionary talk show hosts began screaming 

“Obama taps your phones!”

On June 6, again in advance of every other newspaper in the world, The Guardian published another article by Glenn Greenwald and Ewen MacAskill revealing that the National Security Agency, under a program called Prism, had obtained direct access to the servers of Google, Facebook, Yahoo, Apple, Youtube, Skype, AOL, and Microsoft, and was busily monitoring the content of e-mails, file transfers, and live conversations. Back in the US, reactionary talk show hosts began screaming, 

“Obama reads your e-mail!”

Forget the B.S. stories about Snowden, there is only ONE that applies and you will not hear about it in the press, which has protected the NSA with a great big white wash. Snowden worked out at Kunia. He had an extensive training program he had to go through before being allowed in. He HAD TO have been 99th percentile, the story about high school drop out is B.S, and so is the rest of the washing of his background. After hearing his conscience out at Kunia, he left Hawaii, defected, and told the truth.

There is also a rumor that Snowden worked for a contractor for $122,000 a year. I doubt that seriously because the NSA is so secretive it is extremely wary of contractors, and during my time with the NSA, I saw only 2 people EVER that were contractors, and they were never out on the operations floor. So yeah, I buy $122,000 a year, but NOT with a contractor. People who get to see enough to reveal what Snowden did have million dollar background checks, involving interviews with practically everyone in their past, and the interviewers do not identify themselves, they just talk as friends over a beer or whatever. So no one knows when they are being asked questions about someone the NSA intends to hire. These background checks take a year or so to complete and contractors can't afford to do that, the FED does. What Snowden revealed proves through emperical evidence that he was not employed by a contractor, he was just straight up NSA. The entire High School drop out story is pure B.S., because if during one of these checks any of the secret questioners comes up with even a little whiff of something wrong with your past, YOU ARE OUT.

Unlike the CIA, which has over a million spooks, the NSA is so secretive that very few people break the barrier to entry, which limits the size of the NSA to below 50,000 people total, a majority of which are highly talented super geeks. The expense of the background investigations alone seriously limits the number of people the NSA can hire.

Don't expect anything that is now claimed to be said by Snowden as actually coming from him. They are whitewashing this as fast as possible, while making false posts and statements to the web and media that claim to be from him. By now he has been replaced with the public image of someone else. For starters, it is ERIC SNOWDEN, not EDWARD as we are now told and this subtle name change will be used to deflect meaningful search into his past.

My own experience in the NSA is enough to prove what little I have said about Snowden to be true. There is ONE OPTION - Snowden was BRILLIANT, had extensive back ground searches done on him, went through a very difficult school, got assigned to Kunia where he lived in the same location as many other NSA people who have families do, drove to Kunia daily, and finally could not take what he was seeing there anymore and ratted them out. THAT IS THE ONLY STORY. Snowden did not have a girlfriend. He had a wife, and any reference to him "leaving his girlfriend behind" is another lie. You cannot live where Snowden did and have a "girlfriend", the NSA will not put you in the premium government family housing in Waipahu for only a "girlfriend".

Furthermore, stories about the house being sold now are B.S., because Snowden was in government housing the same as all lower level NSA people are given. Unless you are an outside contractor (and those are very few in number), The NSA does not leave it's people to run with the general public, they all get assigned a living area where like minded people are. And from these few mistakes the press made, we can assume that the entire background they are presenting on Snowden is a lie. The house he was in was never owned by him and DID NOT get sold.

To see a long list of B.S. my own experience proves to be lies, just google "where snowden lived"

Furthermore, the "leaked documents from anonymous" are PURE B.S. and are all readily available public documents. I see this as an attempt to muddy the waters with regard to Snowden's legitimate leak.

Watch for story creep in the mainstream and portions of the alternative press regarding what I have said here, since I am former NSA telling it like it is I have noticed that the story keeps getting regular tweaks to counteract what I say here, the latest being "it was his girlfriend's house". Don't buy into the tweaks, what is above is a truthfully rational assessment of HOW IT HAD TO BE, from someone who simply knows how things are. Granted, when I was with the NSA they were not spying on Americans, but their procedures and methods were anchored in stone and for what I have said above to not weigh out now would mean something massive regarding hiring policy, housing policy, contractor policy and other things changed there, which I doubt, especially if this is the first big leak and Kunia is still misrepresented on Google maps, with the real entry obscured by a cloud.

Where Snowden worked (see my comments following this article) and in case you are new here, I am former NSA and have toured this facility. To pull this up on Google maps, type Kunia Oahu into Google.

If there is one thing we have learned from this, it is that if they can do it they will do it, so this report is going to show you what the capabilities have GOT TO be right now and what to expect from the NSA in the future.

1. Recording of all conversations occurring in cars manufactured after 2004 and sold in the United States via an always on cell connection which is built into the engine control computer. Engine control computers are always placed in the passenger compartment where they can hear everything, though in the past they did not have ears. The fact that they do now was mandated by the Federal government and became a legally required component of all cars from year 2005 on. This started in the late 90's with GM's Onstar. You may have seen an onstar commercial where the Onstar representitive is talking to the driver through the radio speakers. ALL new cars have at least one side of this capability - the outgoing microphone -installed in them NOW.

2. Recording of all conversations happening in the vicinity of a computer equipped with an Intel CoreVPro or Sandy Bridge processor, even if it is not "online" and even while "turned off". Intel evidently thought it was a good security choice to have full time cell connectivity built into the heart of every CPU they produce, and I bet you don't know that new Intel laptop you just bought is ALWAYS online, even when turned off. YOU don't get to use that connection though, which leaves the question, WHO DOES?

3. All cell phones have been and will continue to be (this started in 2005) in speech to text mode, where the phone listens to nearby conversations, converts them to text, and loads the text to an NSA server during cell phone tower updates which happen frequently during the day as part of normal cell operation. In the past, whenever they put full time monitoring on cell phones, the batteries would die in a couple of hours and the phone would always be hot. People noticed this, so to circumvent that all cell phones were equipped with speech to text software and though it is not perfect, it still gives pretty good "intelligence" about the user without draining the battery at all. Once again, as it is with the new Intel processors and their always on cell connection, you don't even know that software exists

4. Recording of all conversations in the vicinity of computers that are turned on and have an internet connection even if they have no CoreVPro or Sandy Bridge CPU, but that's old news.

5. Video and sound recording of household activities within view of a Samsung SmartTV, any of the new video gaming consoles, or any smart meter compliant appliance which can communicate with an electrical smart meter. All electrical smart meters have wifi, 3g, and sometimes 4g connectivity for the sole purpose of "receiving daily energy related instructions". Yeah right.

6. Possible now - ALL cell phones which have cameras most likely are, right now, constantly taking a sequence of photos while out in public, and uploading them during cell tower updates to hide battery usage and the cell phone's owner never realizes this.

People need to recognize the importance of what Edward Snowden did. He gave us a fixed reference point for what the NSA was capable of in 2005, and from there we can calculate what they can do NOW

Moore's law, and what it means for the NSA

Most everyone knows about Moore's law which states that computers will double in power once every 18 months as technology advances. Moore was partially right, because in reality computers ended up doubling in power more frequently - once every 13 months. But let's just use 18 months as a reference standard anyone could agree on. If in 2005 the NSA was able to record and permanently store every phone conversation, video chat, internet record for everyone, every text, every e-mail, and store it forever BACK THEN, let's see how many times that capability just went into that NSA data center in Utah.

2013-2005=8 x 12 = 96 / 18 = 5.3 doublings of processing power since 2005. First doubling will be 1 plus 1, then after that x2. So we have 1+1x2x2x2x2, which equals 32 times the processing power available in 2005. If we take 100 percent and divide it by 32, we can see how strong in percent what they had in 2005 will compare to that new data center in Utah. 100/32 = 3.125% Now, I would like to ask you to appeal to your logic - If they were already permanently recording every phone call, financial transaction, video chat, e-mail, text message, and whatever else with a system that was only a little over 3 percent as powerful as what they just put into Utah, WHAT NEW CAPABILITIES DID THEY JUST GET?

How about:

Every vacation picture you take with any Wifi equipped digital camera instantly uploading to an NSA server for permanent storage as possible future evidence? How about every music project you ever worked on with a PC? How about every family video you ever shot, every place your car ever went and everything you said while driving? How about your smart microwave, via your smart meter, sending out all the audio in your house, to corroborate what your cell phone is sending out, to corroborate what your smartTV is sending out, to corroborate what your PC sent out, to corroborate what your land line sent out, to corroborate what your game console sent out and having ALL of those recordings of what went on in your house being permanently stored on the NSA server, just in case the microwave did not hear it clearly? THAT is what 32 times the capability of what they had in 2005 means, and if we learned anything from Edward, it is that If they can do it, they will do it, which is an affirmation of what I have said all along

I got called a wacko by a few when I said ALL phone conversations were being permanently recorded and stored on an NSA server, as well as all texts and e-mails, regardless of who made them and ended up being right, even if I was behind in saying this by 6 or 7 years. Now I am taking that a step farther, and I would like to ask you, do you think I am wrong this time?

The bottom line is that the surveillance state has gotten so powerful that even a creative mind could never dream up what it is really capable of. There is no doubt a lot I missed

UPDATE: ABOUT THE NSA CENTER IN KUNIA, WHERE SNOWDEN WORKED

Kunia is geographically isolated yet ideally located for electronic warfare operations in the Pacific theatre. It was the largest NSA center on American soil prior to Utah, (there are bigger ones elsewhere) and employs approximately 7,000 people. Now here is the kicker

Because Kunia was geographically isolated, the fact that they could record all phone conversations from there means that the NSA center in Utah, which is on what could be argued as the strongest part of the internet back bone in the world, - that added bandwidth potential with no bottlenecks, means that the data center in Utah will dwarf the abilities of Kunia by at least 200:1.

This also has other damning ramifications - that the NSA really did shift missions after 9/11 because if you wanted to spy on the American mainland, your pride and joy system that recorded everything should not be located in Hawaii. Yet it is confirmed - Edward Snowden worked at Kunia, which as young as he was would have been his only facility. This means that the system of compartmentalized clearances would have prevented him from knowing about PRISM if it was NOT LOCATED AT KUNIA.

And on that note, I have this to say to the NSA:

You traitorous bastards, HOW DARE YOU convert a legitimate defense facility for THAT TYPE OF USE. If you don't like me ratting out Kunia, you can * OFF.


Additionally About the NSA - an important note

The NSA has NO GOONS, NO AGENTS, NO ONE working outside of their secret facilities. IF ANYONE CLAIMS TO HAVE BEEN VISITED BY THE NSA, THEY ARE FRAUDS, THAT DOES NOT HAPPEN. The NSA has nothing but geeks at data terminals, that do ONE THING AND ONE THING ONLY - WATCH AND LISTEN. If you have read online about someone who has been visited by the NSA, they are full of B.S., that is the job of the CIA, FBI, or whatever other agencies have active agents working out in public. The NSA is behind closed doors only.

If you have read anything online about someone getting visited by the NSA, throw it straight in the trash. It's an outright lie.

This article was first published on Jimstonefreelance.com.

Forget the B.S. stories about Snowden

Under George Bush, warrantless wiretaps and similar illegal programs were revealed by various media organs. These revelations had minimal impact on Bush, whose base was indifferent to civil liberties. 

Obama’s base, by contrast, cares very much, and has been visibly upset by these new reports. 

While strongly condemning these totalitarian programs, we must also not lose sight of who is putting these reports into circulation, and why. 

Phone taps are bad, but a general war in the Middle East leading to a possible Third World War is far worse.

The British and French defense and intelligence establishment (they have virtually merged) want Obama and the American people to take the lead and shoulder the risk in a perilous attack on Syria, in time to preserve the death squads so they can fight another day in another country. 

London and Paris, of course, see themselves as the principal beneficiaries of the breakup of Syria. 

Since Obama is currently blocking their plans, they are bringing up their big guns of scandal, with the center-left Guardian evidently chosen to take the point, doubtless to obtain more attention among Obama’s leftist supporters. 

http://spikethenews.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/britain-france-prodding-obama-into.html

Petraeus Kills His Own

Thanks for telling me it was a good day until I briefed you. [General Petraeus]—You are only interested in your career and provide no support to your staff—no msn [mission] support and you don’t care. 

I cannot support a msn that leads to corruption, human right abuses and liars. I am sullied—no more. I didn’t volunteer to support corrupt, money grubbing contractors, nor work for commanders only interested in themselves. 

I came to serve honorably and feel dishonored. I trust no Iraqi. I cannot live this way. 

All my love to my family, my wife and my precious children. I love you and trust you only. Death before being dishonored any more. 

Trust is essential—I don’t know who trust anymore. [sic] Why serve when you cannot accomplish the mission, when you no longer believe in the cause, when your every effort and breath to succeed meets with lies, lack of support, and selfishness? 

No more. 

Reevaluate yourselves, cdrs [commanders]. You are not what you think you are and I know it.

COL Ted Westhusing

Life needs trust. Trust is no more for me here in Iraq.

Petraeus Kills His Own: Col. Ted Westhusing's Death in Iraq from Paul Coker on Vimeo.

Two years before Westhusing left for Baghdad, he had finished his doctoral dissertation in philosophy at Emory University in Atlanta. The focus was on honor and the ethics of war. Westhusing wanted to understand arete—the ancient Greek word meaning virtue, skill, and excellence. His quest for understanding the concept was, he believed, a central part of his existence. “Born to be a warrior, I desire these answers not just for philosophical reasons, but for self-knowledge,” he wrote.

Westhusing did not find excellence or virtue in Iraq.

When he was in Iraq, Westhusing worked for one of the most famous generals in the U.S. military, David Petraeus. In January, Petraeus was appointed by President Bush to lead all U.S. forces in Iraq. As the head of counterterrorism and special operations under Petraeus, Westhusing oversaw the single most important task facing the U.S. military in Iraq then and now: training the Iraqi security forces.

Petraeus was impressed with Westhusing. By 2005, Petraeus had become a darling of the U.S. media thanks, in part, to his success in helping stabilize and rebuild northern Iraq. Petraeus liked what he saw in Westhusing and promoted him from lieutenant colonel to full colonel. In a March 2005 e-mail, Petraeus told Westhusing that he had “already exceeded the very lofty expectations that all had for you.”

It appears that shortly after writing the note, at about 1 p.m. Baghdad time, Westhusing took the 9 mm Beretta automatic pistol he’d been issued at Fort Benning five months earlier, placed it behind his left ear, and pulled the trigger.

After Westhusing’s death, there was a great deal of speculation. 

Some family members and friends began wondering if he had been murdered.

Westhusing was supposed to leave for the U.S. on July 7. Yet he killed himself on June 5. 

Why, they asked, couldn’t he stick it out for just one more month?

Much of the speculation focused on USIS and the contractors. 

Did Westhusing have evidence that the contractors wanted to keep quiet?

There were conflicting stories from the contractors about how they discovered Westhusing’s body. One manager said that the first time he went to find Westhusing after lunch on June 5, the door to Westhusing’s room was locked. 

But on a second visit, he said, he found the door unlocked. Further, one of the first people to find Westhusing in his room, a military contractor, moved Westhusing’s pistol from its original position, claiming he had done so for safety reasons. 

That person was never checked for gunpowder residue.

The Most Important Suicide Note You May Ever Read - Col. Ted Westhusing, June 5th, 2005

Spike vs The BBC: - Bilderberg from Paul Coker on Vimeo.

“The big news at this year’s Bilderberg meeting is the arrival of General David Petraeus, who was forced out last November as head of the US Central Intelligence Agency under circumstances which strongly suggested that he had taken part in a Seven Days in May scenario, joining with a shadowy cabal of generals, admirals, politicians, pollsters and defense contractors to oust Obama from the White House regardless of the actual vote count last November, and to install a permanent dictatorship of war and austerity under the figurehead of the Wall Street financier Willard Mitt Romney.

Kennedy's Warning: Obama, Petraeus, Broadwell, Allen and Ham from Paul Coker onVimeo.

"I'll tell you right now, unequivocally; I won't give the reason for your resignations.... If I were to do that, this country would go right down the drain..." 

President Jordan Lyman

"You can't HANDLE the truth!!" 

Colonel Nathan R. Jessep

The best-known public manifestation of that effort has so far been the Benghazi incident of September 11, 2012, an orchestrated pre-election provocation (or “October surprise”) intended to put the Obama campaign on the defensive.

October Surprise Final Report - Casey Family Press Conference from Paul Coker on Vimeo.

From the Bush-Clinton transition, January 1993.

Liars.

 
Romney and Rove's October Surprise Redux: The Smoking Gun from Paul Coker on Vimeo.

Hillary Clinton went on National Television to blame internet video "The Innocence of Muslims" for triggering a spontaneous protest in Libya which killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three others.

Because that's the CIA told her had happened.

That's NOT what they told the Romney/Ryan Campaign - they told THEM it was an Act of Terror.

At 10:08 EST, footage of the raid on the Benghazi compound shot (and EDITED) by the attackers themselves had already begun airing on CNN on Anderson Cooper's AC360 9/11 Special.

A physcial tape of the (first) attack, edited on an offline editing suite had been handed to CNN and was broadcast live on CNN within 5 hrs of the shooting starting - Al-Jazeera did not recieve a copy.

At 10:08 EST (4:08am in Libya), CIA Officers Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods were still alive.
The CIA sponsored ,militia had just (miraculously) located the super-top secret CIA Secruity Annex and unleashed a SECOND, murderous assault, with the clear intent to leave no-one left alive, only withdrawing when friendly Libyan Miilitias loyal to the Government arrived to chase off the CIA Contra under the Command of Director Petreaus in Langley,

David Petreaus tried to murder him own people at Benghazi.

 
The Benghazi Muggers in Their Own Words (Now with Partial Arabic Translation) from Paul Cokeron Vimeo.
The following was written by the original YouTube user who had the (partial) translation done, and I cannot vouch for it, although I do intend to seek out my own translater for the Mahgrebi Arabic being spoken by the frightened looking men with AK's cowering in fear of the one, batsh*t crazy Arab speaking with a Gulf Arabic dialect and accent, because even to Anglophone easrs, the two are really distinct and he's clearly the only out of town "terrorist" taking part in this glorified mugging.

Just one "terrorist", shooter with an asault weapon and home made flash-bangs.

Damn - that's only about 1/6 as many "terrorist" shooters with assault weapons as we involved in carrying out Columbine.... And they had way better pipe bombs, to boot.

Surely it can't just be because he's brown he's classed as a "terrorist" by The White Man in America, now could it...?

"As I listened to the terrorists speaking in loud voices and at times yelling, I wondered where the American Diplomatic Security Special Agents were? 

Perhaps the nine foot block walls cut out the noise or maybe the terrorists were not even at the U.S. Consulate compound 

(as it turns out, they were right outside the compound). 

I thought surely the CIA looked at this video and immediately had it translated and examined to learn what was said and to determine where the terrorists were having their little talk. 

I thought surely all of the major TV networks and of course the NY Times have reporters who have heard this audio.

Surely they all must know what is being said. 

So where is the translation?

After searching for a certified Arabic translator for three weeks, I finally found one who agreed to translate this video into English.

Unfortunately, once he actually saw and listened to the video he became very distressed. He said that these "people" do not truly represent Islam. After listening patiently to a 1½ hour history lesson on Islam and reading parts of an English translation of the Koran with him, I agreed the terrorists did not represent Islam.

Actually I agreed with him immediately, but he didn't believe me I guess [ GEE, I CAN'T IMAGINE WHY...] —because he kept going. I listened patiently as he proved the terrorists did not represent Islam.

Anyway he finally watched and listened to this short video clip for about an hour.

In the end, he was clearly too stressed to share the translation of everything he heard and he implied that the terrorists were speaking in two different Arabic dialects, Libyan (Maghrebi), which he understood, and another one which he could not understand very well.

So I have concluded that I need another Arabic speaking translator for the parts my translator could not understand or refused to translate for me.

If anyone wants to help, please let me know what you hear in the comments section.

Now as to what my certified translator did translate for me. First he concluded that the terrorists did not seem to have a clear leader. Words and phrase that he could clearly understand are as follows: 

00:00-00:05 Announcer: "We are now showing you the first pictures of the attack on the American Consulate in Benghazi."

 

00:21 "I swear to God you did your best."

00:22 "Listen to me."

00:22 "Take pictures, take pictures." 

00:23-24 "Keep it moving."

00:30 "Listen to me."

00:31 "We did something, no need to waste time talking. We can move forward."

00:32 "I'll stay with you and what I am feeling is the same as you."

00:33 "The American."

00:40--00:41 "You do not know what's going on." 

Note: Here the terrorist may be speaking to the young man in the navy *blue* vest. 

I have concluded that he is a frightened *Blue* Mountain security guard who was lucky to escape with his life. 

00:56—00:58 "Try from other (spot, place, side, or direction.)"

 

01:01 "Trying from other direction."

01:11 "Blood." 

01:13 "Blood."

The remaining statements are untimed. My translator said he had another appointment so I did not get to nail down the times and we did not get through timing the video past 1 minute 13 seconds.

Unknown times:

"Keep using the camera to take pictures."

"Need to show what we can do to America."

"Say or remember God."

"Young men, listen to me."

"The window toward the yard."

"Let them bleed." "

The Benghazi incident occurred in the area of command responsibility of General Petraeus as CIA Director, and of General Carter Ham, head of the US Africa Command. 

Petraeus, Allen, Gaouette, Ham The Benghazi Story The Media Isn't Telling You from Paul Coker on Vimeo.

"Why doth Treason never prosper...?

...for if it prospered, none dare call it Treason...."

Both of these officers, along with Afghanistan commander General Allen, NATO commander Admiral Stavridis, and a dozen or more others of flag rank were ousted for various official reasons in a post election purge.

John Bolton and Gretchen FINALLY get it: - "This would be an Incredibly Stupid Cover-up....It makes no sense!" from Paul Coker on Vimeo.

But there is good reason to conclude that the United States had narrowly escaped what might be called a veiled military coup d’état.“

Zen