From the front page of The People,
17th October 1943:
The story ran in London and other Allied capitals largely on the strength of reports like this, smuggled via the Polish Underground and the resistance-in-exile:
The Zionists ignored it.
George Soros Interview On 60 Minutes
When the Nazis occupied Budapest in 1944, George Soros' father was a successful lawyer. He lived on an island in the Danube and liked to commute to work in a rowboat. But knowing there were problems ahead for the Jews, he decided to split his family up.
He bought them forged papers and he bribed a government official to take 14-year-old George Soros in and swear that he was his Christian godson.
But survival carried a heavy price tag.
While hundreds of thousands of Hungarian Jews were being shipped off to the death camps, George Soros accompanied his phony godfather on his appointed rounds, confiscating property from the Jews.
(Vintage footage of Jews walking in line; man dragging little boy in line)
KROFT: (Voiceover) These are pictures from 1944 of what happened to George Soros' friends and neighbors.
(Vintage footage of women and men with bags over their shoulders walking; crowd by a train)
KROFT: (Voiceover) You're a Hungarian Jew…
Mr. SOROS: (Voiceover) Mm-hmm.
KROFT: (Voiceover) …who escaped the Holocaust…
(Vintage footage of women walking by train)
Mr. SOROS: (Voiceover) Mm-hmm.
(Vintage footage of people getting on train)
KROFT: (Voiceover) …by–by posing as a Christian.
Mr. SOROS: (Voiceover) Right.
(Vintage footage of women helping each other get on train; train door closing with people in boxcar)
KROFT: (Voiceover) And you watched lots of people get shipped off to the death camps.
Mr. SOROS: Right. I was 14 years old. And I would say that that's when my character was made.
KROFT: In what way?
Mr. SOROS: That one should think ahead. One should understand and–and anticipate events and when–when one is threatened. It was a tremendous threat of evil. I mean, it was a–a very personal experience of evil.
KROFT: My understanding is that you went out with this protector of yours who swore that you were his adopted godson.
Mr. SOROS: Yes. Yes.
KROFT: Went out, in fact, and helped in the confiscation of property from the Jews.
Mr. SOROS: Yes. That's right. Yes.
KROFT: I mean, that's–that sounds like an experience that would send lots of people to the psychiatric couch for many, many years. Was it difficult?
Mr. SOROS: Not–not at all. Not at all. Maybe as a child you don't–you don't see the connection. But it was–it created no–no problem at all.
KROFT: No feeling of guilt?
Mr. SOROS: No.
KROFT: For example that, 'I'm Jewish and here I am, watching these people go. I could just as easily be there. I should be there.' None of that?
Mr. SOROS: Well, of course I c–I could be on the other side or I could be the one from whom the thing is being taken away.
But there was no sense that I shouldn't be there, because that was–well, actually, in a funny way, it's just like in markets–that if I weren't there–of course, I wasn't doing it, but somebody else would–would–would be taking it away anyhow. And it was the–whether I was there or not, I was only a spectator, the property was being taken away. So the–I had no role in taking away that property. So I had no sense of guilt.
Now, This Whole 6,000,000 Thing...
Now, its often claimed that the golden number of "Six Million People" so beloved of both Zionists and Neo-Nazis was an invention, along with many more of the more exotic and outlandish aspects of the historical narrative by Albert Hoss, of three former commandants of Auschwitz at the Nuremberg trials.
And it's true, in any normal court, his testimony would be perjurious and totally inadmissible.
For years, it had been rumoured, corroborated and then finally admitted around 1981 that he had been tortured by the British and worked over so hard by a team of Jewish MI5, OSS or Army Intelligence grunts that he would have confessed to the Sharon Tate murders, had they not been committed 25 years in his future.
He testified to all of the usual narrative colour - 6 million dead by gas chamber, mass graves, lampshade made of skin.... Usual stuff. To the horror of his SS colleagues in the dock, who accused the Americans of torturing him.
Hoss was hung in short order and without complaint, with heavy indications that he had cut a deal and been quietly doubled out by the Allied Authorities and delivered over into the custody of the Bormann Group in South America (whether directly or indirectly), whilst Goering, Himmler, Goebels and the others he testified against got fucked.
It's probably the supreme irony that Goering, probably the least doctrinaire, anti-Semitic and most pragmatic and practical of the Nazi leadership became its most high-profile scapegoat in the dock, along with Hitler's chief spin-doctor Herr Goebels and the failed chicken farmer, Herr Himmler.
Anyone reading the Nuremberg transcripts and his extensive interviews given in his death cell would have a hard time not warming to Goering and for such a prominent politician, he has an outlook and a worldview refreshingly free from bullshit, and his reflections on nature of war provocations and democracies are still valuable to the field of political science to this day.
The point is, Hoss was tortured, but he was confabulating, not conflating; he was confirming stories read back to him for most of his confessional testimony, exaggerating and over-egging, not inventing stories from whole cloth.
These stories then, these anecdotes of Shoah were based on published accounts in the allied press (not publicised or prominent ones, pushed by the War Office or British or US Propaganda instruments for ideological motivation), so they were not originating with Hoss, except in the sense that he is one of the people alleged to have actually been doing most of them.
Hoss' "confession", then is unreliable, but not completely false or worthless. It contains true information, but Hoss himself cannot be considered a credible witness at Nuremberg.
When the Juwes Return to Zion
Following World War I, King Faisal's conquest of Damascus and the glorious victory of the British Empire at Battle of Meggido (in the Valley of Jezreel, NOT witnessed by a man named Bügenhäagen, the possessor of 12 ceremonial daggers - at least as far as I know), the Ottoman Province of Palestine was partitioned amongst the Great Powers by League of Nations mandate.
Britain retained control of Egypt, the Sinai and the lucrative Sinai Canal Zone (built with Anglo-French Capital), the French obtained control of Syria, the Lebanon, the Bakkah Valley and the lucrative land route to India and Central Asia, catering exclusively to the opium trade (operated exclusively up til that point by the British).
It was a fair trade, and trade is exactly what it was.
Unless you happened to live there, or be Jewish and oppressed.
These concerns of the criminal Sykes-Picot lobby drive agendas, and headlines and global geopolitics to this very day - in the brinkmanship of Great Power politics, it is satisfying indeed to see the bloodthirsty warmonger and Vichyssoise, Fabius cower in - at least extreme and measured caution - before the Great Russian Putin Bear.
It really is great to have him back.
Unless to happen to be Polish, in which case I'm very sorry.
So, Zionist Terrorism.
Now, that is a REALLY big bomb - we are talking Oklahoma City big
L'Chaim!
Anyway,
Here are some present-day English Nazis:
Yes, they're enthusiastic Zionists. So was Hitler.
Wait - what...?
You've come a Long, Long Way Together,
Through the Hard Times, and the Good
Hitler wanted a Germany, then a Europe free from Jews.
Palestine is in West Asia. Or, Africa-adjacent, if you prefer.
More precisely, Palestine is in Arabia, and everyone who comes from there is an Arab, even if they are a Christian or a Jew (this is where the EDL rank and file begin to get cross-eyed, and start supporting Spurs...)
The World Zionist Lobby of the 1930s and 40s (and 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s and 90s, 2000s and 2010s) wanted a Palestine - more accurately, a Greater Israel, populated and dominated by Jews and, ideally, racially pure as well, thank you very much.
Which is a real problem, since the Jews are not a race. The Ancient Hebrews were a race, the Israelites (according to the Torah, and the Bible) are a race, the Jews are of many races.
You see how this could become a problem.
But I digress - that's another story for another day.
Hitler sought to achieve a Europe free of Jews;
The World Zionist Movement sought to FILL the sparsely populated partially desertified lands of West Asia with Jews.
These two geostrategic goals are self-evidently not at odds...
Put crudely, in fact, this is far more in sync with Hilter's New World Order rather than Churchill's New Word Order, George Bush's New World Order or Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal.
Following the Capitulation of the Vichyssoise in Summer 1940, the British Empire took de facto control of the French Mandate of Transjordan.
The First Ever IDF Recruitment Poster.
Very interesting to note that even prior to the dissolution of the Krakow Ghetto, the Apartheid State of Israel had conceptually seized control of the Golan.
I haven't been able to solidly verify this, but my information is that long prior to the dissolution of the Warsaw and Krakow ghettos, these posters were everywhere, and street-level Irgun recruitment was everywhere, with at least the tacit approval and consent of the German Occupation Commanders.
Never Again:
The Holocaust, Shoah and The Power of Public Myth
Certain words, and concepts are Shibboleth.
Indeed, the word Shibboleth originates from the Torah as a word of mutual recognition (retained in the Ancient Hebrew Qabbalic ritual and practice of Masonic Lore) by which the people of Israel might recognise one of their own from a Cannanite spy - ask an Ulsterman to repeat the phrase,
"How now, brown cow?", you will get (I'm slightly paraphrasing) "Hrr Nurr, Brruan Crrr?"
Ask a County Antrim Nationalist to repeat the same phrase, and you will get something althougher rather different - ironically, something rather more closely resembling actual English.
Often, too often, persons associating themselves with the cause of 9/11 Truth will approach me and ask
"Do you believe the Holocaust was real?"
Assuming the questioner is not an agent, this is, in every sense a deeply ignorant question.
The Holocaust was a 1978 TV MiniSeries Extravaganza.
There were millions of witness to this event, many hundreds of thousands of them still living and copious surviving contemporary documentation in the form of TV Guide, Neilsen Rating return slips and reams and reams of other standardised forms of testing, as well as artists and technical specialists' contracts, camera scripts and the like.
The Holocaust was most assuredly a real, historical event, if happened, and everyone saw it.
Nearly as many as saw Roots.
(Another 1970s American foundational myth, courtesy of arch-plagiarist, Alex Haley of the Office of Naval Intelligence - "Django Unchained was better than Roots" - Bro. Dick Gregory)
The Holocaust was a condensed, sanitised dramatisation of the key events of Shoah.
Prior to 1978, and amongst survivors and knowledgeable historians, Shoah is the accepted and more accurate term for the Jewish experience of formalised State Repression and Percecution under, and within the German Reich.
As such, it formally begins and ends with passage of the Enabling Act in 1933 and resignation of Adolf Hilter as Reichsfuhrer in favour of non-NASDAP affiliated Grand Admiral Karl Doenitz of the Kreigsmarine on May 1st, 1945.
(The "Illuminati Holiday" as many would have it, or World Labour Day (courtesy of the COMINTERN), or most accurately, day after the final night of Beltane)
Heil Doenitz.
But talk of formalities in the question of Shoah is redundant, as well as inappropriate.
Whereas The Holocaust deals in bold, hard assertions, Shoah is the sum accumulation of the feelings of a people, many of them long since dead.
The Holocaust is digital, Shoah is analogue, uneven, nuanced and imperfect.
In Art Speigelman's Maus, he chronicles unflinchingly his camp survivor father's open racism and intolerance of blacks and immigrants in later life;
"I'm very goddamn angry with some of the Jews...!" - Marlon Brando
Brando on Social Attitudes Towards Violence and Suffering and the Hollywood Studio System from Spike1138 on Vimeo.
It's absolutely impossible (it seems) to get the full April 6th 1996 interview with Larry King on the Internet - only this edited clip, with German subtitling. This is made all the more remarkable by the fact that interviews with Brando are like gold dust and rarer than hen's teeth, and his far less frank 1994 interview with King is readily available in its entirety.
The full quote (with contemporary reporting from the London Independant as to what happened next), is as follows:
"Hollywood is run by Jews. It's owned by Jews and they should have a greater sensitivity about the issue of people who are suffering," he said on the programme.
He listed various negative stereotypes he said had been depicted in cinema. "We've seen the nigger and the greaseball. We've seen the Chink. We've seen the slit-eyed dangerous Jap. We have seen the wily Filipino. We've seen everything. But we never saw the kike, because they knew perfectly well that that's where you draw the wagons around."
Rabbi Harvey Fields, of the Jewish Federation of Los Angeles, retorted:
"Mr Brando's comments about Hollywood being controlled by Jews is about as sloppy an anti-Semitism as saying that Jews control banks."
[No, they don't because the largest banks in the world are German, Swiss and Japanese, financed by Bormann Group Nazi flight capital with the assistance often, collaboration and expertise in London and New York and Hamburg of Bormann Jews - but Jews certainly do not CONTROL banks, and any who tried would be liable to end up like Meyer Lansky - which I suspect the Jewish Federation of Los Angeles is well aware of; the JDL, the ADL and the Simon Wiesenthal Center certainly are...]
The Jewish Defense League responded by sending the actor a letter entitled :
"Message to the Godfather of Hate" -
"You gladly take money from Hollywood producers and then vilify the industry with slanderous accusations of anti-Semitic vulgarities."
[Actually at that point, he hasn't made a mainstream film Hollywood in almost 20 years; and it was legendary Hollywood movie producer Robert Evans who had the revelation when conceiving The Godfather that the reason mob movies never made money in Hollywood and never felt real was by virtue of the fact that all the mobsters were played by Jews, not Italians]
Initially, Brando, 72, who has been active in the civil-rights movement, denied his comments were anti-Semitic.
"I will be the first one who will praise the Jews honestly and say 'Thank God for the Jews.' The Jews are amazing people."
Rabbi Hier, who heads the Simon Wiesenthal Centre Los Angeles, said he was happy with yesterday's meeting, which took place at the home of Brando's friend David Ross.
"I am satisfied, after spending three hours with the man, that Marlon Brando is not an anti-Semite."
[But they still forced him to take a tour of the Museum of Tolerance - a man who sent an Indian Tribeswoman to collect his Accadamy Award to afford her a global stage to speak to the world of the plight of her people's oppression]
To say that Jews own and control the mass media is considered offensive, and the above remark earned Marlon Brando a punitive trip to the Museum of Tolerance in LA for expressing himself so crudely.
(There's also an Ameican Holocaust Museum in Washington DC, which they regularly send prominent African American celebrities and community leaders to as punishment; the idea of having an American Holocaust Museum in DC is of course absurd - it should of course be located on Wall Street)
But were we instead to say "The Jews control vaudeville", or "The Jews control Broadway"...?
No one who has ever heard of Mel Brooks could deny that with a straight face.
Ownership and control does not imply malintent, but it does create a class interest.
One of Jews that Brando was "very goddamn mad" at in 1996 was undoubtably Steven Speilberg, the man who made an epic Holocaust movie, with a happy ending.... In Israel, in Jerusalem, on the Mount of Olives.
As Terry Gilliam correctly critiques him, that isn't the story of the Holocaust - at all.
It's a story of human failure on a massive and societal scale, and there is NO Silver lining to it - in Schiendler's List, the Silver Lining is, explicitly, "Next Year in Jerusalem".
The Process of Greater Israeli Settlement Will Necessarily Be a Long One;
Absent Some Catastrophic and Catalysing Event - Like a New Final Solution.
