Thursday 25 July 2013

The Royal Changeling: 1688 and All That....



Away with us he's going,
The bright, but solemn eyed -
He'll hear no more the lowing
Of the calves on the warm hillside
Or the kettle on the hob
Sing peace into his breast,
Or see the brown mice bob
Round and round the oatmeal chest

For he comes, the human child
To the waters and the wild
With a faery, hand in hand
From a world more full of weeping than he can understand




I quote The Enemy (at length) :

The Duke of York, an avowed Catholic, was twenty-five years older than his bride, scarred by smallpox and afflicted with a stutter.

He had secretly converted to Catholicism around 1668.

Mary first saw her husband on 23 November 1673 OS, on the day of their second marriage ceremony.

James was pleased with his bride.

Mary, however, at first disliked him, and burst into tears each time she saw him.

Nonetheless, she soon warmed to James.

From his first marriage to the commoner Anne Hyde, who had died in 1671, James had two daughters: Lady Mary and Lady Anne.

They were introduced to Mary by James with the words, "I have brought you a new play-fellow".

Unlike Lady Mary, Lady Anne disliked her father's new wife.

 Mary played games with Anne, to win her affection.


The Duchess of York annually received £5,000 spending money and her own household, headed by Carey Fraser, Countess of Peterborough; it was frequented by ladies of her husband's selection: Frances Stewart, Duchess of Richmond—Charles II's discarded mistress—and Anne Scott, 1st Duchess of Buccleuch.

That the Duchess of York loathed gambling did not stop her ladies compelling her to do so almost every day.

They believed that "if she refrained, it might be taken ill".

Consequently, Mary incurred minor gambling debts.


The birth of the Duchess of York's first child, Catherine Laura, named after Queen Catherine, on 10 January 1675 OS represented the beginning of a string of children that would die in infancy.

At this time she was on excellent terms with Lady Mary and she visited her in The Hague after the younger Mary had married William of Orange. She travelled incognito and took Anne with her.


Separated from Lady Isabella once again, Mary sank into a state of sadness, exacerbated by the passing of the Exclusion bill in the Commons.

Lady Isabella, thus far the only one of Mary's children to survive infancy, died in February 1681.

Isabella's death plunged Mary into a religious mania, worrying her physician.





At the same time as news reached Holyrood of Isabella's death, Mary's mother was falsely accused of offering £10,000 for the murder of the King.

The accuser, a pamphleteer, was executed by order of the King.


The Exclusionist reaction that followed the Popish plot had died down by May 1682.

Exclusionist-dominated Parliament, suspended since March 1681, never again met in the reign of Charles II.

Therefore, the Duke and Duchess of York returned to England, and the Duchess gave birth to Princess Charlotte Mary in August 1682; Charlotte Mary's death three weeks later, according to the French ambassador, robbed James of "hope that any child of his can live"—all James's sons by Anne Hyde, his first wife, died in infancy.




 James's sadness was dispelled by his revival in popularity following the discovery of a plot to kill the King and him.

The objective of the plot, known as the Rye House Plot, was to have Monmouth placed on the throne as Lord Protector.

The revival was so strong that, in 1684, James was re-admitted to the Privy Council, after an absence of eleven years.


Despite all the furore over Exclusionism, James ascended to his brother's thrones easily upon the latter's death, which occurred on 6 February 1685 OS, possibly because the said alternative could provoke another civil war.



Queen Mary's health had still not recovered after the death of Lady Isabella. So much so, in fact, that the Tuscan envoy reported to Florence that "general opinion turns [for Mary's successor] in the direction of the Princess, Your Highness's daughter".




France, too, was preparing for the Queen's imminent demise, putting forward as its candidate for James's new wife the Duke of Enghien's daughter.


The Queen was then trying to make her brother, the Duke of Modena, marry the former, Anna Maria Luisa de' Medici.


In February 1687, the Queen, at the time irritated by the King's affair with Catherine Sedley, Countess of Dorchester, moved into new apartments in Whitehall; Whitehall had been home to a Catholic chapel since December 1686.


Her apartments were designed by Christopher Wren at the cost of £13,000. Because the palace's renovation was thus far unfinished, the King received ambassadors in her rooms, much to the Queen's chagrin.

Five months later, shortly after the marriage talks with Tuscany collapsed, the Queen's mother, Duchess Laura, died.

Therefore, the whole English court went into mourning.

Duchess Laura left Mary "a considerable sum of cash" and some jewellery.

William III of Orange, James's son-in-law, sensed popular discontent with James's government; he used the death of Mary's mother as a guise to send his half-uncle, Count Zuylestein, to England, ostensibly to condole Queen Mary, but really to spy.


Having visited Bath, in the hope its waters would aid conception, Queen Mary became pregnant in late 1687.

When the pregnancy became public knowledge shortly before Christmas, Catholics rejoiced.




Protestants, who had tolerated James's Catholic government because he had no Catholic heir, were concerned.

The Protestant disillusion came to a head after the child's male sex became known, when many Protestants chose to believe the child was illegitimate.

They did this to prevent the perpetuation of James II's Catholic dynasty...




In April 1688, James re-issued the Declaration of Indulgence, subsequently ordering Anglican clergymen to read it in their churches.

When seven Bishops, including the Archbishop of Canterbury, submitted a petition requesting the reconsideration of the King's religious policies, they were arrested and tried for seditious libel.

Public alarm increased when Queen Mary gave birth to a Roman Catholic son and heir, James Francis Edward on 10 June of that year.

When James's only possible successors were his two Protestant daughters, Anglicans could see his pro-Catholic policies as a temporary phenomenon, but when the Prince's birth opened the possibility of a permanent Catholic dynasty, such men had to reconsider their position.

Threatened by a Catholic dynasty, several influential Protestants claimed the child was "supposititious" and had been smuggled into the Queen's bedchamber in a warming pan.


They had already entered into negotiations with William, Prince of Orange, when it became known the Queen was pregnant, and the birth of James's son reinforced their convictions.




Popular opinion alleged that the child, named James Francis Edward, was sneaked into the birth chamber as a substitute to the Queen's real but stillborn child.

This rumour was widely accepted as fact by Protestants, despite the fact the birth-chamber was intentionally packed full of 200 witnesses, both Protestant and Catholic.





Princess Anne of Denmark, later to be Queen Anne, answered a memorandum of 18 questions regarding James Francis Edward's birth for her sister, the Princess of Orange.

Anne's answers, biased and unreliable, convinced the Princess of Orange that her father had thrust a changeling upon the nation.

Count Zuylestein, returning to the Netherlands shortly after the birth, agreed with Anne's findings.

From the moment of his birth, on 10 June 1688, at St. James's Palace, the prince was the subject of controversy. He was born to the reigning king, James II of England (and VII of Scotland), and his Roman Catholic second wife, Mary of Modena, and as such was automatically Duke of Cornwall and Duke of Rothesay among other titles.


The Wars of Religion were fresh in the minds of the populace, and many British feared a revived Catholic dominance of the government. James II had two adult daughters from his first marriage, the future queens Princess Mary and Princess Anne, who had been raised as Protestants. As long as there was a possibility of one of them succeeding him, his opponents saw his rule as only a temporary aberration. When people began to fear that James's second wife, Mary, would produce a Catholic son and heir, a movement grew to replace him with his elder daughter Princess Mary and his son-in-law/nephew, William of Orange.


King James's policies of religious tolerance after 1685 had met with increasing opposition by members of leading political circles, who were troubled by the king's Catholicism and his close ties with France. The crisis facing the king came to a head in 1688, with the birth of the King's son, James Francis Edward Stuart, on 10 June (Julian calendar).

This changed the existing line of succession by displacing the heir presumptive, his daughter Mary, a Protestant and the wife of William of Orange, with young James as heir apparent. 

The establishment of a Roman Catholic dynasty in the kingdoms now seemed likely. 

Some of the most influential leaders of the Tories united with members of the opposition Whigs and set out to resolve the crisis by inviting William of Orange to England,which the stadtholder, who feared an Anglo-French alliance, had indicated as a condition for a military intervention.


After consolidating political and financial support, William crossed the North Sea and English Channel with a large invasion fleet in November 1688, landing at Torbay. After only two minor clashes between the two opposing armies in England, and anti-Catholic riots in several towns, James's regime collapsed, largely because of a lack of resolve shown by the king. However, this was followed by the protracted Williamite War in Ireland and Dundee's rising in Scotland.

In England's geographically-distant American colonies, the revolution led to the collapse of the Dominion of New England and the overthrow of the Province of Maryland's government. Following a defeat of his forces at the Battle of Reading on 9 December, James and his wife fled England; James, however, returned to London for a two-week period that culminated in his final departure for France on 23 December. By threatening to withdraw his troops, William in February 1689 convinced a newly chosen Convention Parliament to make him and his wife joint monarchs.

The Revolution permanently ended any chance of Catholicism becoming re-established in England. For British Catholics its effects were disastrous both socially and politically: Catholics were denied the right to vote and sit in the Westminster Parliament for over a century; they were also denied commissions in the army, and the monarch was forbidden to be Catholic or to marry a Catholic, this latter prohibition remaining in force until the UK's Succession to the Crown Act 2013 removes it once it comes into effect. 

The Revolution led to limited toleration for Nonconformist Protestants, although it would be some time before they had full political rights. 

It has been argued that James's overthrow began modern English parliamentary democracy: the Bill of Rights of 1689 has become one of the most important documents in the political history of Britain and never since has the monarch held absolute power.

Internationally, the Revolution was related to the War of the Grand Alliance on mainland Europe. It has been seen as the last successful invasion of England.

It ended all attempts by England in the Anglo-Dutch Wars of the 17th century to subdue the Dutch Republic by military force. However, the resulting economic integration and military co-operation between the English and Dutch Navies shifted the dominance in world trade from the Dutch Republic to England and later to Great Britain.

The expression "Glorious Revolution" was first used by John Hampden in late 1689,and is an expression that is still used by the British Parliament.

 The Glorious Revolution is also occasionally termed the Bloodless Revolution, albeit inaccurately. 

The English Civil War (also known as the Great Rebellion) was still within living memory for most of the major English participants in the events of 1688, and for them, in comparison to that war (or even the Monmouth Rebellion of 1685) the deaths in the conflict of 1688 were mercifully few.




English Bill of Rights 1689

An Act Declaring the Rights and Liberties of the Subject and Settling the Succession of the Crown

Whereas the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons assembled at Westminster, lawfully, fully and freely representing all the estates of the people of this realm, did upon the thirteenth day of February in the year of our Lord one thousand six hundred eighty-eight [old style date] present unto their Majesties, then called and known by the names and style of William and Mary, prince and princess of Orange, being present in their proper persons, a certain declaration in writing made by the said Lords and Commons in the words following, viz.:

Whereas the late King James the Second, by the assistance of divers evil counsellors, judges and ministers employed by him, did endeavour to subvert and extirpate the Protestant religion and the laws and liberties of this kingdom;

By assuming and exercising a power of dispensing with and suspending of laws and the execution of laws without consent of Parliament;

By committing and prosecuting divers worthy prelates for humbly petitioning to be excused from concurring to the said assumed power;

By issuing and causing to be executed a commission under the great seal for erecting a court called the Court of Commissioners for Ecclesiastical Causes;

By levying money for and to the use of the Crown by pretence of prerogative for other time and in other manner than the same was granted by Parliament;

By raising and keeping a standing army within this kingdom in time of peace without consent of Parliament, and quartering soldiers contrary to law;

By causing several good subjects being Protestants to be disarmed at the same time when papists were both armed and employed contrary to law;

By violating the freedom of election of members to serve in Parliament;

By prosecutions in the Court of King's Bench for matters and causes cognizable only in Parliament, and by divers other arbitrary and illegal courses;

And whereas of late years partial corrupt and unqualified persons have been returned and served on juries in trials, and particularly divers jurors in trials for high treason which were not freeholders;

And excessive bail hath been required of persons committed in criminal cases to elude the benefit of the laws made for the liberty of the subjects;

And excessive fines have been imposed;

And illegal and cruel punishments inflicted;

And several grants and promises made of fines and forfeitures before any conviction or judgment against the persons upon whom the same were to be levied;

All which are utterly and directly contrary to the known laws and statutes and freedom of this realm;
And whereas the said late King James the Second having abdicated the government and the throne being thereby vacant, his Highness the prince of Orange (whom it hath pleased Almighty God to make the glorious instrument of delivering this kingdom from popery and arbitrary power) did (by the advice of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and divers principal persons of the Commons) cause letters to be written to the Lords Spiritual and Temporal being Protestants, and other letters to the several counties, cities, universities, boroughs and cinque ports, for the choosing of such persons to represent them as were of right to be sent to Parliament, to meet and sit at Westminster upon the two and twentieth day of January in this year one thousand six hundred eighty and eight [old style date], in order to such an establishment as that their religion, laws and liberties might not again be in danger of being subverted, upon which letters elections having been accordingly made;

And thereupon the said Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons, pursuant to their respective letters and elections, being now assembled in a full and free representative of this nation, taking into their most serious consideration the best means for attaining the ends aforesaid, do in the first place (as their ancestors in like case have usually done) for the vindicating and asserting their ancient rights and liberties declare

That the pretended power of suspending the laws or the execution of laws by regal authority without consent of Parliament is illegal;

That the pretended power of dispensing with laws or the execution of laws by regal authority, as it hath been assumed and exercised of late, is illegal;

That the commission for erecting the late Court of Commissioners for Ecclesiastical Causes, and all other commissions and courts of like nature, are illegal and pernicious;

That levying money for or to the use of the Crown by pretence of prerogative, without grant of Parliament, for longer time, or in other manner than the same is or shall be granted, is illegal;

That it is the right of the subjects to petition the king, and all commitments and prosecutions for such petitioning are illegal;




That the raising or keeping a standing army within the kingdom in time of peace, unless it be with consent of Parliament, is against law;



That the subjects which are Protestants may have arms for their defence suitable to their conditions and as allowed by law;



That election of members of Parliament ought to be free;

That the freedom of speech and debates or proceedings in Parliament ought not to be impeached or questioned in any court or place out of Parliament;

That excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted;

That jurors ought to be duly impanelled and returned, and jurors which pass upon men in trials for high treason ought to be freeholders;

That all grants and promises of fines and forfeitures of particular persons before conviction are illegal and void;

And that for redress of all grievances, and for the amending, strengthening and preserving of the laws, Parliaments ought to be held frequently.

And they do claim, demand and insist upon all and singular the premises as their undoubted rights and liberties, and that no declarations, judgments, doings or proceedings to the prejudice of the people in any of the said premises ought in any wise to be drawn hereafter into consequence or example; to which demand of their rights they are particularly encouraged by the declaration of his Highness the prince of Orange as being the only means for obtaining a full redress and remedy therein. Having therefore an entire confidence that his said Highness the prince of Orange will perfect the deliverance so far advanced by him, and will still preserve them from the violation of their rights which they have here asserted, and from all other attempts upon their religion, rights and liberties, the said Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons assembled at Westminster do resolve that Williamand Mary, prince and princess of Orange, be and be declared king and queen of England, France and Ireland and the dominions thereunto belonging, to hold the crown and royal dignity of the said kingdoms and dominions to them, the said prince and princess, during their lives and the life of the survivor to them, and that the sole and full exercise of the regal power be only in and executed by the said prince of Orange in the names of the said prince and princess during their joint lives, and after their deceases the said crown and royal dignity of the same kingdoms and dominions to be to the heirs of the body of the said princess, and for default of such issue to the Princess Anne of Denmark and the heirs of her body, and for default of such issue to the heirs of the body of the said prince of Orange. And the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons do pray the said prince and princess to accept the same accordingly.
And that the oaths hereafter mentioned be taken by all persons of whom the oaths have allegiance and supremacy might be required by law, instead of them; and that the said oaths of allegiance and supremacy be abrogated.

I, A.B., do sincerely promise and swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to their Majesties King William and Queen Mary. So help me God.
I, A.B., do swear that I do from my heart abhor, detest and abjure as impious and heretical this damnable doctrine and position, that princes excommunicated or deprived by the Pope or any authority of the see of Rome may be deposed or murdered by their subjects or any other whatsoever. And I do declare that no foreign prince, person, prelate, state or potentate hath or ought to have any jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence or authority, ecclesiastical or spiritual, within this realm. So help me God.
Upon which their said Majesties did accept the crown and royal dignity of the kingdoms of England, France and Ireland, and the dominions thereunto belonging, according to the resolution and desire of the said Lords and Commons contained in the said declaration. And thereupon their Majesties were pleased that the said Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons, being the two Houses of Parliament, should continue to sit, and with their Majesties' royal concurrence make effectual provision for the settlement of the religion, laws and liberties of this kingdom, so that the same for the future might not be in danger again of being subverted, to which the said Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons did agree, and proceed to act accordingly. Now in pursuance of the premises the said Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons in Parliament assembled, for the ratifying, confirming and establishing the said declaration and the articles, clauses, matters and things therein contained by the force of law made in due form by authority of Parliament, do pray that it may be declared and enacted that all and singular the rights and liberties asserted and claimed in the said declaration are the true, ancient and indubitable rights and liberties of the people of this kingdom, and so shall be esteemed, allowed, adjudged, deemed and taken to be; and that all and every the particulars aforesaid shall be firmly and strictly holden and observed as they are expressed in the said declaration, and all officers and ministers whatsoever shall serve their Majesties and their successors according to the same in all time to come. And the said Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons, seriously considering how it hath pleased Almighty God in his marvellous providence and merciful goodness to this nation to provide and preserve their said Majesties' royal persons most happily to reign over us upon the throne of their ancestors, for which they render unto him from the bottom of their hearts their humblest thanks and praises, do truly, firmly, assuredly and in the sincerity of their hearts think, and do hereby recognize, acknowledge and declare, that King James the Second having abdicated the government, and their Majesties having accepted the crown and royal dignity as aforesaid, their said Majesties did become, were, are and of right ought to be by the laws of this realm our sovereign liege lord and lady, king and queen of England, France and Ireland and the dominions thereunto belonging, in and to whose princely persons the royal state, crown and dignity of the said realms with all honours, styles, titles, regalities, prerogatives, powers, jurisdictions and authorities to the same belonging and appertaining are most fully, rightfully and entirely invested and incorporated, united and annexed. And for preventing all questions and divisions in this realm by reason of any pretended titles to the crown, and for preserving a certainty in the succession thereof, in and upon which the unity, peace, tranquility and safety of this nation doth under God wholly consist and depend, the said Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons do beseech their Majesties that it may be enacted, established and declared, that the crown and regal government of the said kingdoms and dominions, with all and singular the premises thereunto belonging and appertaining, shall be and continue to their said Majesties and the survivor of them during their lives and the life of the survivor of them, and that the entire, perfect and full exercise of the regal power and government be only in and executed by his Majesty in the names of both their Majesties during their joint lives; and after their deceases the said crown and premises shall be and remain to the heirs of the body of her Majesty, and for default of such issue to her Royal Highness the Princess Anne of Denmark and the heirs of the body of his said Majesty; and thereunto the said Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons do in the name of all the people aforesaid most humbly and faithfully submit themselves, their heirs and posterities for ever, and do faithfully promise that they will stand to, maintain and defend their said Majesties, and also the limitation and succession of the crown herein specified and contained, to the utmost of their powers with their lives and estates against all persons whatsoever that shall attempt anything to the contrary. And whereas it hath been found by experience that it is inconsistent with the safety and welfare of this Protestant kingdom to be governed by a popish prince, or by any king or queen marrying a papist, the said Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons do further pray that it may be enacted, that all and every person and persons that is, are or shall be reconciled to or shall hold communion with the see or Church of Rome, or shall profess the popish religion, or shall marry a papist, shall be excluded and be for ever incapable to inherit, possess or enjoy the crown and government of this realm and Ireland and the dominions thereunto belonging or any part of the same, or to have, use or exercise any regal power, authority or jurisdiction within the same; and in all and every such case or cases the people of these realms shall be and are hereby absolved of their allegiance; and the said crown and government shall from time to time descend to and be enjoyed by such person or persons being Protestants as should have inherited and enjoyed the same in case the said person or persons so reconciled, holding communion or professing or marrying as aforesaid were naturally dead; and that every king and queen of this realm who at any time hereafter shall come to and succeed in the imperial crown of this kingdom shall on the first day of the meeting of the first Parliament next after his or her coming to the crown, sitting in his or her throne in the House of Peers in the presence of the Lords and Commons therein assembled, or at his or her coronation before such person or persons who shall administer the coronation oath to him or her at the time of his or her taking the said oath (which shall first happen), make, subscribe and audibly repeat the declaration mentioned in the statute made in the thirtieth year of the reign of King Charles the Second entitled, _An Act for the more effectual preserving the king's person and government by disabling papists from sitting in either House of Parliament._ But if it shall happen that such king or queen upon his or her succession to the crown of this realm shall be under the age of twelve years, then every such king or queen shall make, subscribe and audibly repeat the same declaration at his or her coronation or the first day of the meeting of the first Parliament as aforesaid which shall first happen after such king or queen shall have attained the said age of twelve years. All which their Majesties are contented and pleased shall be declared, enacted and established by authority of this present Parliament, and shall stand, remain and be the law of this realm for ever; and the same are by their said Majesties, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons in Parliament assembled and by the authority of the same, declared, enacted and established accordingly.

II. And be it further declared and enacted by the authority aforesaid, that from and after this present session of Parliament no dispensation by _non obstante_ of or to any statute or any part thereof shall be allowed, but that the same shall be held void and of no effect, except a dispensation be allowed of in such statute, and except in such cases as shall be specially provided for by one or more bill or bills to be passed during this present session of Parliament.

III. Provided that no charter or grant or pardon granted before the three and twentieth day of October in the year of our Lord one thousand six hundred eighty-nine shall be any ways impeached or invalidated by this Act, but that the same shall be and remain of the same force and effect in law and no other than as if this Act had never been made.



David Cameron and The Junior Anti-Sex League (ANTISEC)



"She had been a troop-leader in the Spies and a branch secretary in the Youth League before joining the Junior Anti-Sex League. She had always borne an excellent character. She had even (an infallible mark of good reputation) been picked out to work in Pornosec, the sub-section of the Fiction Department which turned out cheap pornography for distribution among the proles. 

It was nicknamed Muck House by the people who worked in it, she remarked. There she had remained for a year, helping to produce booklets in sealed packets with titles like Spanking Stories or One Night in a Girls' School, to be bought furtively by proletarian youths who were under the impression that they were buying something illegal."















Perhaps the brought him to term in a Bacta Tank.

Warm nutrient bath, anyone?


On the same day as the "Royal Birth" Prime Minister Dave Cameron announced legislation requiring ISPs to institute an "opt-in" policy for adult content rather than an "opt-out" policy, as is currently the case. 

"To protect Children"

If anyone can think of anything more injurious to free speech and civil liberties, I'd like to hear it.

Because I can't.




'What are these books like?' said Winston curiously.


'Oh, ghastly rubbish. They're boring, really. They only have six plots, but they swap them round a bit. Of course I was only on the kaleidoscopes. I was never in the Rewrite Squad. I'm not literary, dear -- not even enough for that.'

He learned with astonishment that all the workers in Pornosec, except the heads of the departments, were girls. The theory was that men, whose sex instincts were less controllable than those of women, were in greater danger of being corrupted by the filth they handled.



To most of those people, sober minded, intellectuals, slapping a cock against a woman's face is a degrading and violent act of sexual sadism.

But all porn is emotional fiction, fantasy, transferrance and wish fulfilment.

It's a performance - just like Titus Andronicus, Romeo and Julliet (who were both 13 at the time of the story), the Song of Esther or 50 Shades of Grey.

50 Shades of Grey is "Extreme Pornography".


Remember the mail (male) fraud scam in LS2SB?

The Superdildo manufacturer issuing refunds from "Arse-Ticklers Faggots Fanclub Inc."?

When BT say they are going to make people opt in to receiving porn, who do you think is going to tick that box on the form?

And who gets that information?

And what happens when they start introducing other opt-ins? Like 9/11 Truth?

Life as she saw it was quite simple. 

You wanted a good time; 

'they', meaning the Party, wanted to stop you having it; 

you broke the rules as best you could. 

She seemed to think it just as natural that 'they' should want to rob you of your pleasures as that you should want to avoid being caught....



Wednesday 24 July 2013

Blood Oath: The Conspiracy to Murder Nicole Brown Simpson




For The Record #10 - 
Blood Oath (1996)
Dave Emory

These segments are excerpted directly from the text of Blood Oath: The Conspiracy to Murder Nicole Brown Simpson by Stephen Worth and Carl Jaspers (soft cover edition: Rainbow Books, copyright 1996) and cover the events set forth in the book. In addition to the points of information outlined in the description of the above interview with Stephen Worth, the series contains a chilling description of the actual killing of Ron and Nicole, as related by an anonymous informant who maintains he was a member of the strike team. (Recorded in July of 1996.)

Kate Middleton's Doctor Wanted to Buy a New Front Door in 1999 - His Mrs. Was Dead Against it


[All credit to Elaine's mate Matt for the joke that led to that title - strange what you remember sometimes....]










Royal Baby Scam : Jill Dando’s Murder link and Fiance : In charge of the Scam : All you need to know : Kate was and has not been pregnant : Why did they kill the nurse : What a Right Royal Scam:


THE FULL MOON BABY STORY WITH A DIFFERENCE: A Royal twist that deserves closer scrutiny:

Remember if “they cover it up” it does not mean we cannot “find the real truth”:

It all started with the Murder of Jacintha Saldahna back in December 2012. 

The palace couldn’t risk a leak to the media that Kate and Britain’s future King rented the womb of a surrogate(s) and faked Kate’s pregnancy. That news would have been disastrous for the reputation of the heartless royals and their future King.

Jacintha Saldanha’s death was blamed by the media on the prank call in order to put a stop to any murder investigation. A murder investigation might have proved that an MI6 agent snuck into her flat, forced her to write a suicide note, then strangled her with a scarf and hung her inside her wardrobe closet.

In one of three letters that Jacintha may have been forced to write, she said, “Please accept my apologies. I am truly sorry. Thank you for all your support.” Another note said, “I hold the Radio Australians Mel Greig and Michael Christian responsible for this act. Please make them pay my mortgage. I am sorry. Jacintha.” Does this sound authentic?

Jacintha’s body “bore injury marks on the wrist, a medical report, based on her autopsy, stated.” The unexplained body injury marks on her wrist were possbly the result of being apprehended by her murderer who made her death appear to be a suicide.

Fake baby _n

Get the whole of Part One here : http://www.helpfreetheearth.com/news825_kate.html

BUT Please ask yourself one question, is the lady in this Photo Below Pregnant ?

Has she got the swollen lobes, hands, fingers, ankles that all ladies get when they haveto provide for a baby?

My Tiny thin Japanese Wife had a swollen Forehead too:

SO just how is it possibly all faked?

ALL YOU GIRLS KNOW THE ANSWER:

KateBelly_3

Here in Part 2: Jill Dando’s Murder exposes the Doctors who are in on the cover up and why it is all staged:

REAL VERSUS FAKE DUE DATE

If Kate and William’s baby was conceived “in vitrio” during Kate’s hospital stay between December 3 and December 6, 2012, the baby is not due to be delivered by the surrogate until early September, 2013.

Since the public has been deceived into believing that Kate was 4 to 8 weeks pregnant during her “fake” morning sickness stay in the hospital, the public expects her to give birth in July.

That means the “July” birth will have to be faked and a substitute “photo op” baby or babies if it is “twins” will be used for publicity purposes until Kate and William’s “real” baby or babies (twins) arrives in early September.

   

The first person to be officially notified of the “fake” birth(s) will be the Queen, who is expected to be told in person.

It is unknown which members, if any, of the Middleton-Goldsmith family will be at the hospital when the Duchess goes into (fake) labour.

In other words, the only scammers involved in the royal birth deception are William, Kate, the royal family, Kate’s parents and the two baby doctors.

Kate’s baby doctors are Alan Farthing and Marcus Setchell.

BABY DOCTOR #1 – MURDER SUSPECT

Kate’s baby doctor, Alan Farthing, is at the center of one of Britain’s most notorious murder scandals. Jill Dando was Dr. Farthing’s fiance and she was also a popular BBC news anchor and host when she was shot dead in 1999.

According to police reports, Jill Dando, left Dr. Farthing’s home in the morning to go shopping. When she returned to her London home, she was fatally shot on the front steps. A scream was heard by witnesses but no shots were heard.

Rumors started circulating that Dr. Farthing may have had a hand in his fiance’s murder…but they were ignored.
 Instead of investigating Dr. Farthing for the murder, the police focused their investigation on another man, Barry George, who was falsely convicted of the murder and sentenced to life in prison. In 2008, his conviction was overturned on appeal and Barry George was acquitted after spending seven years in jail for a murder he didn’t commit.

 One of Britain’s most notorious murder cases – the murder of Dr. Farthing’s fiance – is once again an “unsolved” murder. It is a well known fact that 80% of killers are known to their victim.

BLACKMAIL

What could Dr. Farthing’s motive have been for murdering his fiance, Jill Dando? Dr. Farthing became engaged to the popular TV host who was like the “British Katie Couric”. Just five months before the planned wedding, Jill was shot dead in broad daylight.

Jill Dando was allegedly investigating a paedophile ring linked to Jimmy Savile, to the BBC and to other VIP’s including politicians, judges, royals and doctors. One of Jill’s friends was named and after she asked him about it, she was shot. Was that friend Dr. Alan Farthing? Did Jill Dando confront her fiance about his connection to the paedophile ring?

The trail leads to the Elm House child sexual abuse scandal in Rocks Lane and to another death. The one-time owner, Carole Kasir, who couldn’t “keep her trap shut”, was also silenced under suspicious circumstances.

According to a royal insider, the royal family is aware of Dr. Farthing’s questionable past. He became Queen Elizabeth’s personal gynecologist in 2008 around the same time that the man convicted of murdering Farthing’s fiance was acquitted.

Farthing will never face murder charges or life in prison for the unsolved murder. Why? Because he will do and say whatever he is told to do and say so that the fictitious royal birth in mid-July is sold to the public without a glitch.

But what about Kate’s other baby doctor – Marcus Setchell? Would he be willing to cooperate with the royal birth charade?

There is stacks more proof here: http://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2013/07/09/barry-george-jill-dando-jimmy-savile-bbc-paedophiles-cliff-richard-alan-farthing-nick-ross-and-britains-dirty-secrets/

  

BABY DOCTOR #2 – SUED FOR NEGLIGENCE

Marcus Setchell took over as the Queen’s surgeon-gynaecologist in 1990. In 2005, the Queen made him the Knight Commander of the Royal Victorian Order.

The British Royal family have always been steeped in Freemasonry through their own orders like the Knights of the Garter, the Order of the Thistle, the Order of St John of Jerusalem (Knights of Malta) and the Royal Victorian Order. All of them interlock with the Freemasonic networks.

THE “PHOTO OP” BABY OR BABIES (TWINS)

Kate has told her friends she will be living with her parents for a least six weeks after giving (false) birth at the hospital, the Daily Mail reports. The Duchess has also decided not to hire a maternity nurse. What? No maternity nurse? Of course not. Why? Because there’s no need for one!

William and Kate’s plans to move into their apartment at Kensington Palace came to a halt because of a lame excuse about finding asbestos in the home. As multi-millionaire Prince William pretends to return to work as a helicopter rescue pilot, Kate will need a place to stay withtons a privacy while raising their “photo op”baby or twins…and awaiting the birth of their “real” baby or babies by surrogate(s).

Kate will be staying with her parents in the family’s new 7 million dollar home that they bought with their savings from their children’s party business. Uh huh. Kate wants to be around people that she can trust (with her surrogate secret).

A source told the Daily Mail that ”Kate just feels safest and most secure when she’s with her family.” But, isn’t William her family? What’s she doing moving back in with her parents? Why isn’t William around to participate as a parent?

TOO POSH TO PUSH – OTHER ROYAL SURROGATES

The Queen’s mother, Elizabeth Bowes Lyon, was the born from a surrogate. The surrogate was the family’s French cook – Marguerite Rodiere. This explains the unflattering nickname ‘Cookie’given to the Queen Mother.

The Queen Mother’s exact date of birth in August 1900 as the fourth daughter of Lord Glamis has always been disputed. It remains unclear whether she was born in the back of a London ambulance or the family home. 

Another puzzle is why the Queen Mother, born the Honourable Elizabeth Angela Marguerite Bowes Lyon, was given a French middle name. Elizabeth’s secret was not so secret in aristocratic and royal circles.

http://theflowofperceptions.blogspot.ca/2012/03/british-royal-surrogate-mothers.html

Once you know this you can enjoy the Mainstream slobbering all over this fairy tale.

This story is as true as Kate being involved with the Killing Kittens Club in London on previous posts where satanic peadofilia rituals are taken place on children unwhittingly gobbled up by the social services who are a service provided by the Royal Family.

The Killing Kittens club is a favourate jaunt for all the Royals and incidentally Kate’s Dad too.

Such a cosy relationship thay all have in the Royals huh?

So please enjoy the fake birth and more sidestepping the real issues at hand.

By design this fake birth is a massive distraction form the real news.

They are going down. THE EVENT is upon them all.

Namaste 

Dave


Mirrored from:

http://lightworkersxm.wordpress.com/2013/07/23/royal-baby-scam-jill-dandos-murder-link-and-fiance-in-charge-of-the-scam-all-you-need-to-know-kate-was-and-has-not-been-pregnant-why-did-they-kill-the-nurse-what-a-right-royal-scam/