Jacintha Saldanha
1966 - 2012
Cause of Death:
Suidcided by MI5 Signature "Tragic Wanking Accident"
(Autoerotic Asphyxiation)
Likely Suspects:
MI5 and the Royals
And the Bodyguard of Lies.
These are the emails I nearly sent in to the Blairite vulture Keith Vaz, Westminster Coroner's Office and Private Eye last December, before thinking better of it...
" Detective Chief Inspector James Harman of the Met told the hearing: “Jacintha Saldanha was found by a colleague and a member of security hanging from a scarf attached to a wardrobe. There were also some injuries to her wrists.
“At this time there are no suspicious circumstances. Two notes were found at the scene and another note recovered from her belongings.” "
A Carradine Special?
Finally, the Smoking Gun: That is absolute, complete and utter unmitigated BOLLOCKS.
Was she attempting to end her life or just felt like felt the urge to knock out a potentially lethal wank before work?
And how TALL was this wardrobe, exactly...?
You CANNOT kill yourself by choking/strangulation/asphyxiation just by looping a scarf or other noose around your neck and leaning forward or otherwise just lifting your feet off the floor.
The reason it's such a widely practiced method for (men) to practice autoerotic asphyxiation (aka a posh wank) is that is nearly impossible to accidentally to die whilst attempting it, since your airway is never fully constricted; it's what's known as a blood choke, not a airways choke, and you usually roll back onto your heals the moment you pass out, releasing the tension in the noose and allowing blood flow to return to the brain.
Police and contract hitmen the world over know this damn well and it's a widely practiced method of a) getting away with murder b) getting away with not investigating possible instance of murder or unexplained sudden death and bringing additional shame onto the deceased and discouraging relatives and friends from looking into the matter too closely by making it appear as though they died as the result of a tragic, self-inflicted wanking accident.
Otherwise, if they really want to sell a corpse as being victim of a suicide (despite the psychopathology to support such a finding), they will occasionally leave booze and medications strewn around the room and slash crudely at the wrists, which of course will not cause any significant loss of blood when done to a corpse.
Corpse do not bleed when they have their wrists slashed because they have no blood pressure.
People only bleed while they're alive and their hearts are still beating.
End your life by hanging, either by asphyxiation or strangulation is incredibly difficult to do right, is long, painful, traumatic, involves pretty much the largest degree of suffering imaginable and can go wrong in numerous different highly unpleasant ways.
Suicide by wrist slashing in either a very hot or very cold bath is about as simple, painless and about as free from suffering as it is possible
The Detective Superintendent and all the officers attending the scene all know this damn well.
And therefore they are lying.
A hanging corpse with its feet touching the floor and cuts to the forearms that did not bleed is more than simply suspicious:-
It's de facto, Prima Face evidence of murder with Police collusion after the fact.
And Catholics don't commit suicide.
And I'm sending this to the IPCC, the Coroner's Court, Keith Vaz and Private Eye.
This was murder. Definitively.
And this is not a new or rare occurrence.
The intelligence community in the past has routinely used this method to do anyway with investigative jounrnalists, particularly those persuing links between CIA drug trafficking, the Bush Family and the financing of global terrorism via Saudi oil money routed through places like Pakistan, Panama and the Far East through CIA proprietary banks, shell companies and private offshore financial back channels such as the Nugan-Hand Bank, the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI), many of the more obscure Savings and Loan failures in the 80s, Enron, Bain Capital (not yet proved, but damningly implicated) and (almost certainly, given what we know and what we were able to see of its collapse) Lehman Brothers.
A staggering number of people associated with Bill and Hillary Clinton, up to and including Ambassador Christopher Stevens less than three months ago, but stretching back into the early 1980s during Iran Contra, when Clinton was Governor of Arkansas at a time when Mena Air Force Base was designated for a number of years as the main port-of-entry for Cocaine importation into the United States by Barry Seal and Oliver North's "Private Enterprise" scheme for illegally funding the Contras, working under the Vice-Presidential Taskforce on Counter-Terrorism chaired by George HW Bush and run from inside the White House during the 1980s.
Quite literally several dozen deaths of people who worked closely with Bill and Hillary Clinton, from family friends dating back to college like Vince Foster, key political fixers and popular unifying organisers within the Democratic Party like Ron Brown, John F.Kennedy Jr and Mel Carnahan, influential supporters within the military and intelligence hierarchy like Admiral Boorda and former Director of Central Intelligence William Colby, all the way down to Arkansas State Troopers and Secret Service agents formerly assigned to close protection duty have ALL been killed in plane crashes, freak accidents or completely out of the blue, out of character apparent suicides with a crime scene that does not make sense or relate to the ruling of suicide.
Several dozen more of Clinton's constituents in Arkansas met strange, nonsensical and clearly murderous ends after getting to close to the matter of Mena Air Force Base and all the cocaine; Clinton himself as Governor was coerced or duped into covering up most of these murders in the early years by appointing a tame and obviously corrupt State Medical Examiner named Fahmy Malik; Malik was once presented with a decapitated corpse, still lacking a head and recorded as cause of death after autopsy as being : "ULCER" - the man had been out taking his dog for a walk, Malik concluded, 10 miles out in the woods, when he succumbed to his fight with a stomach ulcer, fell down dead and prior to being found, his dog had gotten hungry and eaten the head in one go.
The assertion by DCI Harman in his Inquest testimony is equally ludicrous , and obviously perjurous in this instance to boot;
No one sets out to kill themselves by slashing at their wrists before opting to change tactics and choke themselves to death when they realise it isn't killing them quickly enough... And *certainly* no one ever sets out to do it the other way around.
Especially not when they spend their entire working day surrounded on every side by quite literally thousands of easily deliverable and painlessly lethal drugs and other chemicals to which she had free and unrestricted access to all day, every day.
You would have to believe that Ms Saldanha was literally a complete moron to even contemplate any other course, had that been her intent and I don't believe for one second that she is either of those things.
The Police are lying to the press, lying to to the public, lying to the coronor's Inquest (under oath, I might add), and encouraging others to lie for them in order to prejudice the findings of the Inquest whilst violating all their own basic rules of conduct and police proceedure and engaging in a blatent cover-up.
The only reason they didn't lied to the IPCC first is because no one has got around to registering a formal complaint about them yet.
Scotland Yard, and specific, named officers are lying under oath, perverting the course of justice to conceal a murder and that makes them accessories after the fact to the individuals that strung up Jacintha's corpse for all to see.
I almost cannot bring myself to comtemplate who or why, but mercifully, it isn't even a matter for speculation, here.... The Met last Friday flew into action last Friday faster than a freshly-scalded cat, spinning and propagandising at a rate 3 or 4 times faster than they do when actually investigating a crime under normal conditions. No politician can put the Fear of God into the and make them snap into damage control that fast, nor could the Royals themselves, in all likelihood;
Jacintha was found "unconscious" (according to some reports) at 9.35am, and pronounced dead at the scene when the ambulance crew arrived and failed to revive her, possibly placing time of death up to an hour later.
By lunchtime, a Scotland Yard Press Officer who was not medically qualified, had not seen the body or the discovery site, nor been in the same room as either was describing her death as "suspected suicide" and "Not Suspicious", when in fact it was profoundly so.
By 3.30pm, less than 6hrs after her death, no less than the National Chairman of the Royal College of Nursing and Lord Collingwood stepped out together onto the front steps of the hospital to read from a precisely worded PREPARED joint statement that emphatically stated for the record, without any question, that this WAS a suicide, and that absolutely, beyond any question of a doubt, the 25 seconds of her life she spent speaking on the phone to a blonde Australian woman pretending to be the Queen IS the reason that she is not now alive.
Watch the statement. It couldn't be clearer.
If she had not picked up the phone to answer that call, she WOULD be alive right now.
Is that right? You'll be telling us she was upset because of a video mocking Muhammed, next.
Pull the other one.
This incident hasn't produced a suicide yet, but it will.
I've seen the interviews given since by Mel Grieg and Michael Christian since the incident - and they are NOT coping with this. They think they caused this, because that's what they've been told and that's the only information they have at this point and are thus forced to accept it must be true, because what other explanation have they got?
I saw the look of complete and total bewhilderment and despair in Mel Greig's eyes, written all over her face, and it made me break down in tears just the same.
The Establishment spoke clearly and emphatically last Friday to place the full blame for this totally, squarely and unambiguously on their two heads.
Let me now be equally plain: Mel Grief CANNOT live with this hanging around her neck.
With things left the way they are, she cannot find her way back from this experience. I wouldn't give her more than a year at the most wracked by borrowed guilt and twisted into psychic agony of the horror of this false reality for her every waking second.
I can't allow that.
Or next, it might just be that a little girl of just 8, taught her whole life to believe that those who reject God's ultimate gift of life are condemned for all eternity, beyond any hope of redemption in any life, under any circumstance to eternal and everlasting hellfire and torment might just decide, when she really wants her Mum more than anything else in the world, there's really only one thing to be done, which will resolve everything at a stroke. Once and for all.
Or it might be one of her boys, or Benedict or one of her cousins back in Mangalore. It doesn't matter who it comes to first, it will be coming.
I will not allow that little girl to be told by anyone that her Mummy is in hell at this moment.
Not for any reason.
And certainly not solely to conceal the fact that an arm of the State, in the Service (such is their presumption) of the Crown has gone out and deliberately murdered a seemingly completely innocent woman in response to a technical and inadvertent breach in security which *could* have resulting in a member of the Royal family being embarrassed or ridiculed as a result.
Not when that arm of the State press-gangs in their little brothers to lie through their teeth about who this woman was in her life and what ended her.
Not when that State actor draggoons in Chairmen of nationally recognised professional bodies along with a Lord of the Realm to lie through their teeth to the world's press corps by reading a prepared statement to divert blame onto more innocent people and away from themselves.
This case involves a slapdash faked suicide scene that even the Dallas county police department in the late 1960s would have been ashamed to put their name to, a breach in Royal security and obvious bullying of Police to rush the cover-up and control the way the story played out in the media.
Which means its MI5. The worst part is that I can't *even* bring myself to be even slightly surprised at this stage, much shocked.
I can't even bring myself to be disappointed in them for doing this, to a certain extent, perhaps just because they seem to have been SO amateurish and obvious in how they went about it.
I just would like to know what the hell they THOUGHT they were they were doing pulling this crap over something so trivial.
I actually feel sorry for them at this point - its almost as though they LITERALLY have nothing better to do with their time anymore, now the Troubles are over and the War of Terror is winding down. It's pathetic....
No use going to the Police or the Press, obviously, they'll stonewall and then destroy anyone they think might expose their dirty laundry.
The politicians are a dead loss on this one too, because they don't respect them and know that the pols think they work for them rather than Queen and Country. I know they don't tell the Prime Minister the truth about what they get up to, but I'm not certain that he knows that, or would particularly concerned to learn they didn't. The only possible exception I can think of off the top of my head really is Lord Ashdown, because he's ex- Special Boat Service (amongst other things) and they won't dare mess him around.
Aside front that, the only real power you can exert over them is their institutional inferiority complex regarding MI6, it dominates nearly everything they do and has for decades.
They can go off and behave like compete idiots with something to prove on their own time and at our expense, I can't change that; they will do whatever they feel like anyway, regardless of what you and I or anyone else thinks of them and what they get up to with our taxes.
I don't care about exposing all their attrocities to the world at this stage, what good would that do? Even if you do bring them all down, there's nothing that you could do to them that they're afraid of or aren't confident they can wriggle out of by cheating or gaming the system, and they'd only be replaced by something even worse.
I'm not interested in some stupid, adolescent quest for revenge, I just want to see some restitution , just this once. I want to see them just admit, even only to themselves, the harm they've caused here and the lives that they've ruined in the process and just make the effort to put it right rather than just pretending they were never there and telling lies about this woman to her family
And I'm not just saying that because I'm paranoid they might be intercepting my emails and will come and kill me for figuring out this one and telling people about it who I think need to know
Devout Roman Catholics believe that if you commit suicide, it is an irredeemable mortal sin. That's why it's so incredibly rare to find they've actually done so.
If you are going to tell an 8 year old girl that Mummy is now in Hell and she will never see her again, it would be nice to know whether you are actually right.
Might be worth checking whether you've dotted all the "i"s and crossed all the "t"s on this one...
It appears that public inquests are not quite so public in practice as they notionally are in practice and in law (even if we long since bothered actually bothering to TELL people that...), so I have found it almost impossible to either attend or to raise or highlight any pertinent concerns or relevant information I may have or can offer about the manner of this woman's death and how it may have occurred before the ruling is in and the matter effectively closed.
They also shut their doors at 3.30pm on weekdays and take a two hour break over lunch, which hardly inspires confidence that they are giving proper consideration to the facts.
I have concerns. Grave ones.
I considered bringing them directly to Mr Bardozza himself, even at the risk of intruding on his grief, I felt it that important that he be made aware of them, but without being certain of my suspicions, it would sure serve only to increase the trauma and endless questions flooding both his and his families minds at this time.
The police, the press, and possibly very soon the Westminster Coroner's Office have failed this woman, her family in India , Mr Bardoza and his three children and - I stress this point most emphatically - the two Australian radio presenters now made global pariahs and the target of death threats and hate mail the world over - who have done nothing wrong. And their lives are now ruined every bit as much as that of Mr Bardozza and his family from this point forward.
I do have profound concerns about this inquest process, beginning from the first instance when I heard this news, and they have not gone away or been allayed. Indeed, they have got worse. Exponentially worse.
The first duty of the Police when attending the scene of an unexpected death is to preserve the condition of the body and the area around it as a potential crime scene until it can be determined whether or not a crime may have been committed. Which was not done.
Not to protect Royalty from embarrassment. Which was.
I have my suspicions about what may or may not have happened in this case, but nothing more than circumstantial evidence either way - the total media blackout had ensured that no-one outside of the Metropolitan Police Force has access or knowledge of such evidence. I would be happy to bring such suspicions to public (and I must insist, public) attention, and had hoped to do so at or prior to the Inquest hearing. If that option is no longer available, I am loathe to do so privately, since I lack the confidence that they would be acted upon and criticising the police in this country without the protection afforded by the complete openness of the public square is sadly no longer limited to being the simple demand for better accountability of public officials and acceptable standards of a taxpayer funded resource as once it was in this country.
What I do have in the meantime is clear and manifest proof of gross misconduct and possible malfeasance in their conduct of what might otherwise be reasonably termed an investigation.
Quite simply there was no investigation into this woman's death, not in any recognised police procedural sense.
She was found (or so we are told, and so that is all that I, myself, know) dead (although some say "unconscious", later pronounced dead by paramedics on arrival) at the Nurses Quarters at 9.35am and pronounced dead at the scene.
About the condition of her body, where it was, what position it was in, what was nearby, how long it had been there, whether there were pill bottles present, rigour mortis setting in, a knife sticking out of her chest, I know nothing and we have been told nothing, so I have no basis for speculation.
Ms. Saldanha was extremely unfortunate in that her death happened to coincide with or follow on from encounter with The Royals; had it not done so, I can only assume, or rather hope, that the sole focus and priority of those charged with officially responding to it might have been her and not one of her patients.
It goes without saying (or at least, it SHOULD go without saying) that any sudden and unnatural death of a person 48hrs after their participation (however tangential) in a phonecall during which a Royal security breach occurs, however minor and inadvertent must presumptively be regarded as suspicious rather than the other way around. Therein lies the first instance of failing to identify the proper focus of a process that was now contaminated by PR concerns from the outset.
Taken in isolation from the Royal angle entirely, the scale of police misconduct and interference seems utterly unprecedented in any case I can remember.
Ms. Saldanha was pronounced dead at the scene sometime shortly after 9.35am, but by lunchtime, a Scotland Yard press release had declared to the world her death was a "suspected suicide" and "not suspicious".
I find this insulting.
A devout Catholic who commits suicide completely without prior warning is prima face suspicious.
A devout Catholic Asian woman over 40 working as a nurse who commits suicide is PROFOUNDLY suspicious - she is the the lowest ranking demographic group in nearly every category when it comes to instances of suicide, she one of the LEAST likely people to ever commit suicide it's possible to think of.
Going purely on demographic trends, if you were going to randomly select from a random cross section of the population of 2000 people and asked the experts which ones they thought would be likely to kill themselves, she would quite literally be the absolute last person they would pick.
So it behooves us to resolve this anomaly as best we can. What we cannot do, however, is merely ignore it.
The damage was done, however. Within three hours, a non-medically qualified Scotland Yard Press Officer who had never met Ms. Saldanha, nor viewed her body, or visited the potential crime scene in which she lay had issued a blanket press release, announcing to the world that her death was suspected to be "suicide", 3 days prior to her post-mortem and almost a full week before the full coroners inquest could convene to consider a ruling.
But I'm sure that did't prejudice or impede the conduct of his investigation in the least.
Just as I am sure that
Devout Roman Catholics believe that if you commit suicide, it is an irredeemable mortal sin. That's why it's so incredibly rare to find they've actually done so.
If you are going to tell an 8 year old girl that Mummy is now in Hell and she will never see her again, it would be nice to know whether you are actually right.
Might be worth checking whether you've dotted all the "i"s and crossed all the "t"s on this one...
It appears that public inquests are not quite so public in practice as they notionally are in practice and in law (even if we long since bothered actually bothering to TELL people that...), so I have found it almost impossible to either attend or to raise or highlight any pertinent concerns or relevant information I may have or can offer about the manner of this woman's death and how it may have occurred before the ruling is in and the matter effectively closed.
They also shut their doors at 3.30pm on weekdays and take a two hour break over lunch, which hardly inspires confidence that they are giving proper consideration to the facts.
I have concerns. Grave ones.
I considered bringing them directly to Mr Bardozza himself, even at the risk of intruding on his grief, I felt it that important that he be made aware of them, but without being certain of my suspicions, it would sure serve only to increase the trauma and endless questions flooding both his and his families minds at this time.
The police, the press, and possibly very soon the Westminster Coroner's Office have failed this woman, her family in India , Mr Bardoza and his three children and - I stress this point most emphatically - the two Australian radio presenters now made global pariahs and the target of death threats and hate mail the world over - who have done nothing wrong. And their lives are now ruined every bit as much as that of Mr Bardozza and his family from this point forward.
I do have profound concerns about this inquest process, beginning from the first instance when I heard this news, and they have not gone away or been allayed. Indeed, they have got worse. Exponentially worse.
The first duty of the Police when attending the scene of an unexpected death is to preserve the condition of the body and the area around it as a potential crime scene until it can be determined whether or not a crime may have been committed. Which was not done.
Not to protect Royalty from embarrassment. Which was.
I have my suspicions about what may or may not have happened in this case, but nothing more than circumstantial evidence either way - the total media blackout had ensured that no-one outside of the Metropolitan Police Force has access or knowledge of such evidence. I would be happy to bring such suspicions to public (and I must insist, public) attention, and had hoped to do so at or prior to the Inquest hearing.
What I do have is clear and manifest proof of gross misconduct and possible malfeasance in their conduct of what might otherwise be reasonably termed an investigation.
Right. That's crossing a line, now.
Send this to everyone you know.
I've gone full Hastings.
"If anything Happens to Me and Yoko, it was not an accident..."
Send this to everyone you know.
I've gone full Hastings.
"If anything Happens to Me and Yoko, it was not an accident..."
John Lennon, 1972
David Icke ~ Jimmy Savile, the Royals and the Vatican from Spike1138 on Vimeo.
Icke's not a nutter - ignore the less than 1% of what he has to say about interstellar lizards, Icke's right.
He's absolutely right. And he's been right for nearly 20 years now and you need to start taking seriously what he has to say.
As well as being a Knight of the Realm, Savile was also created a Knight Commander of the Papal Equestrian Order of Saint Gregory the Great (KCSG).
This is one rank above Rupert Murdoch, an inductee into the same papal order as an ordinary Knight (KSG).
The chvialric rank is granted by the Holy Father as an order of merit to be bestowed (to quote his inaugural brief) on “gentlemen of proven loyalty to the Holy See who, by reason of their nobility of birth and the renown of their deeds or the degree of their munificence, are deemed worthy to be honoured by a public expression of esteem on the part of the Holy See”.
The end of the brief states that they must progressively maintain, by continued meritorious deed, the reputation and trust they had already inspired, and prove themselves worthy of the honor that had been conferred on them, by unswerving fidelity to God and to the sovereign Pontiff.
Rupert Murdoch, the most powerful Media Mogul on Earth, has sworn an oath of "unswerving fidelity" , loyalty and service to the Vatican.
Which explains a lot.
Paul Gambucci Tells the Truth About Jimmy Savile and the Establishment from Spike1138 on Vimeo.
New of the World editor 'spiked paedophilia scoop on Arthur C Clarke for fear of Murdoch'
Ex-reporter claims story never ran because the sci-fi author was the proprietor's friend
MARTIN HICKMAN, The Independent, SATURDAY 07 JULY 2012
The News of the World spiked an exclusive story exposing the science fiction writer Arthur C Clarke as a paedophile, according to a new book about life inside the newspaper whose closure was announced a year ago today.
In Hack, an account of his nerve-shredding days as a reporter on the News of the World and then the Sunday Mirror, Graham Johnson claims that although the NOTW prided itself on outing pederasts, editors made an exception for Mr Clarke because he was a friend of Rupert Murdoch.
Through BSkyB, the tycoon commercially exploited the futurologist's theory that satellites would be ideal for communications and praised him in public. As a result, according to Mr Johnson, who by that time had been sacked by the NOTW and had joined the Sunday Mirror, a story by reporter Roger Insall about Mr Clarke's alleged abuse of adolescent boys was never published for fear of upsetting the proprietor.
Tipped off about the story, the Sunday Mirror sent Mr Johnson to Colombo, where he extracted an confession from the author that he paid boys for sex. "I have never had the slightest interest in children – boys or girls. They should be treated in the same way. But once they have reached the age of puberty, then it is OK," Mr Clarke was quoted as saying in the Sunday Mirror. "If the kids enjoy it and don't mind it doesn't do any harm … there is a hysteria about the whole thing in the West."
Mr Clarke subsequently denied he was a paedophile, saying: "The allegations are wholly denied." But he never sued the Sunday Mirror and died aged 90 at his Sri Lanka home in 2008.
Speaking to The Independent yesterday, Mr Johnson said: "Roger [Insall] said that because Arthur C Clarke was a mate of Rupert Murdoch, the editor wasn't having any of it and despite Roger getting a lot of evidence that Clarke was a paedophile they wouldn't publish it."
Yesterday, Phil Hall, the then editor, said: "I can vaguely remember that story. I do remember that Roger Insall worked on it and I remember it was not published. My only recollection is that the only reason we wouldn't publish it was because of legal reasons."
He said Mr Murdoch never asked him to spike stories. News International, publisher of the NOTW, made no comment.
Savile, Interrupted : When Louis Met Jimmy. from Spike1138 on Vimeo.
Savile: There's nothing I can't get and there's nothing I can't do.
*******
[On the grand tour of Louis' Luxury Penthouse in Leeds, Savile welcomes his guests inot his boudouir where he gestrures over to his double-bed with a flourish]
Saville: "Here we are... The Altar..!"
Louis: "....why do you call it "The Altar"..."
Saville: "Because..."
Louis [Jokingly]: "It's not where you sacrifice people, is it...?
*******
[Louis reaches up to examine a Charles and Di commemerative tea caddy from Savile spartan kitchen cupboard]
Louis: Charles and Diana... Who you know...Can we talk about that...?
Savile: We can talk about anything.
Louis: You,,, don't want to talk about that....?
Savile: You'll find out how tricky I am...!
When Louis Met Jimmy.
Inside the Brotherhood: Masonic Ritual and Lore from Spike1138 on Vimeo.
Freemasonry, Paedophia and Ritual Abuse: The Conspiracy of Silence from Spike1138 on Vimeo.
General Michael Aquino on Oprah - A Credible Accusation of Satanic Ritual Murder from Spike1138 on Vimeo.
McAlpine: Satanic Ritual Abuse and Project Monarch in the UK from Spike1138 on Vimeo.
Monarch Mind Control is a form of mind control which creates a mind control slave by utilizing the human brain's trauma response of dissociation to create a form of Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD) wherein various triggers can cause the slave personality to surface and respond to commands given by the master ("Handler" in Monarch parlance).
Despite the intuitive connection between the Handler and a King or Monarch, the Monarch in this context refers to Monarch Butterflies, not to a Monarchical form of government.
The Monarch Mind Control designation was originally applied by the US Department of Defense to a sub-program under the CIA's MK-Ultra Program. However, the techniques employed in the Monarch programming system extend back further under various names, such as the Nazi marionette programming.
Even further back, the techniques used in Monarch programming can be traced to various generational Satanist families among European royalty. The MPD state created by the Monarch programming techniques were used to isolate the personality involved in Satanic rituals from a public face. Without this alternate personality, the nobles practicing Satanism inevitably went insane, so it's practice spread rapidly through the occult community.
It is unclear who first started practicing the MPD techniques as a way of creating mind control slaves rather than as a defense mechanism, but it is clear that the Nazis were using Electro-shock and binding to create slaves in the 1940s. After World War II, some German and Italian psychologists who were working on Marionette programming were brought to the United States to continue working on their research
