Sunday 19 January 2014

Drum Majors and Gatekeepers

"Wait, hold up... My Preacher-sense is tinglin'..."

Ernestine Campbell along with her husband owned the Trumpet Hotel located by the Lorraine Motel. Moments before and after Dr. King was shot she made the following observation… 

No one had ever talked to her or asked her about what she saw on that fateful afternoon. 

Ernestine said she left the hotel and started for home just before 6 p.m., driving her gold-bronze Cadillac up Butler and turning right on Mulberry. As she passed the Lorraine driveway on Butler, she saw Dr. King standing on the balcony. 

She didn’t hear anything because she had the car windows up and the radio on. 

As she turned the corner on Mulberry she looked up and saw Dr. King lying on the balcony. She thought he’d had a heart attack. 

She stopped for a minute or two at the driveway, wondering why people weren’t racing to the balcony. Possibly she had arrived at the driveway when everyone was still in a state of shock.

Her attention was in particular drawn to Jesse Jackson who she said had one foot on the first step of the stairway looking up to the balcony while bent over …putting something into a suit bag.” 

Jesse Jackson looked startled when Ernestine Campbell noticed him putting something in a suit bag.

What item could Jesse possibly be placing in the suit bag? Was the suit bag noticed by Ernestine the same tote bag Don Rose noticed Jesse carrying around Chicago shortly after Dr. King’s assassination? 

Jesse’s startled appearance suggests that he was placing something in the suit bag that he did not want anyone to notice.
A Drum Major may look as though he is leading from the front, but in reality, he always is marching to the beat of somebody else's tune.





"Where are all our 'responsible' black leaders...?"

Translation: "Where are all the Negroes we pay to come and attack this fool?"

Ah, yes...

On the evening of April 4th 1968, Memphis, Tn. was a City on lockdown, amidst the largest federal manhunt in history.

(Made necessary by James Earl Ray's street smarts when hearing news of the assassination over the gas-station radio in driving his White Mustang quickly AWAY from the rooming-house above Jim's Grill, rather than back towards it, where he would have been immediately arrested by the Memphis cops laying in wait for him there.)

All bridges, tunnels, roads, freeways, trucks, trains, planes and automobile exits from Shelby County were closed and subject to Police roadblocks and searches.

All plane flights grounded until the following day.

Except for one plane, carrying one negro man aboard, back to Chicago, released by the Control Tower at the direct request of the FBI.

Meanwhile, the rest of the King entourage and senior leadership of SCLC were stuck right where they had been at 6.03 pm, where circumstances forced them into wearing the clothes they had the night before:


NOTE: Instructions given to the back-up 111th Airbourne Sniper Team, stationed on the roof of the firehouse adjacent to the Lorraine Motel, at their 4pm final briefing, April 4th 1968:

"Friendlies will not be wearing ties."

Jackson was long gone from Memphis whilst Abernathy and Young, the only two men senior to him in the national SCLC hierarchy were held incommunicado and subject to a Federal Investigation, ironically under the terms of the 1965 Civil Rights Act... 

But before he left, he spoke to The Press:


 [April 4, 1968]
JESSE JACKSONI need to see Dr. King. Can I get a ride to see Dr. King?

[Everyone else in the entourage was driven, under police escort, in a motorcade to the hospital - "getting a ride to see Dr. King" was not his immediate concern]


REPORTER: Say, Reverend...



JESSE JACKSON: Can you excuse us, Jack?



REPORTER: Will you tell me just what happened, please?



JESSE JACKSON: Can it wait a little while?



REPORTER: Would you tell me just what happened so can get this film in, please?



CALVIN MORRIS

Jesse always senses the moment, and it was an epochal moment, and he was there.

[Because he got away from the others - and the Memphis Police - by ducking out of riding in the ambulance or travelling in the convoy to the hospital by saying he was sick.]


JESSE JACKSON

The black people's leader, our Moses, the once in a 400 or 500-year leader has been taken from us by hatred and bitterness. 



Even as I stand at this hour, I - I cannot even allow hate to enter my heart at this time, for it was sickness, not meanness, that killed him.



People were_ some were in pandemonium, some were in shock, some were crying, hollering, 


"Oh, God!" 



And I immediately started running upstairs to where he was and I caught his head and I tried to feel his head and I asked him, I said, 



"Dr. King, do you hear me? Dr. King, do you hear me?" 



And he didn't say anything and I tried to hold his head. And by that time...






"When I see you here, so much alive, asking what to do, where to turn - I am available now. 



I am more convinced than ever that every time that there is a crucifixion in right and righteousness, that inevitably and universally there is a resurrection."


JESSE JACKSON
[April 12, 1968] 


Nice watch, Jesse.


MARSHALL FRADY
King aides, long resentful of Jackson, saw his behavior as brazen opportunism. They were already angry that he had spoken to the press in the hours after the assassination and furious that he had so dramatically inflated his own part in the story of King's final moments.

ANDREW YOUNG
A lot of those resentments that had been buried in the movement, and that allowed us to work alongside each other, but never expressed, got expressed in the emotion and frustration of Martin's assassination.

MARSHALL FRADY
Some began retailing the story of the last meeting at Ebenezer just days before the assassination. 

As their story went, King had exploded at Jackson, told him to go do his own thing and leave him alone. 

Andy Young was standing next to Jackson when the exchange took place. 


At that meeting, in a study at Ebenzer church, King “just jumped on everybody,” says Young. 


“He said we’d let him down. That we all had our own agendas and constantly left everything up to him. "

He said, ‘I can’t take all of this on by myself. I need you to take your share of the load.’” 

Finally came his outburst of exasperation, far more widely retold, with Jackson, who had kept pressing for alterations of the Poor People’s Campaign: King had fumed out of the room, with Jackson trailing after him, along with Young. Jackson called from the top of the stairs as King and Abernathy were turning on the landing below, “Doc?Doc?” 

Young recalls, “Jesse tried to encourage him, but it was sort of a glib thing, you know, ‘Don’t worry, everything’s going to be all right.’” 

At that, King wheeled and pointed a finger up at Jackson: 

“Jesse, everything’s not going to be all right. If things keep going the way they’re going now, it’s not SCLC but the whole country that’s in trouble. I’m not asking, Support me. I don’t need this. But if you’re so interested in doing your own thing, that you can’t do what this organization’s structured to do, if you want to carve out your own niche in society, go ahead. But for God’s sake don’t bother me!” 

Jackson was left with a blasted and desolate stare. 

Young remembers, 


“It was shocking in a sense that he never talked to anybody like that. Though he’d often been mad at me, nobody had ever seen him mad like that before.”

…That challenge turned out to be the last substantive words King ever passed on to Jackson.

He remembers King's message to Jesse was much deeper than a simple rebuke.

ANDREW YOUNG
It was shocking, in the sense that he never talked to anybody like that. 

And the thing that happened was that Jesse tried to encourage him - you know, 

"Don't worry. Everything's going to be all right." 

And he turned and said, 

"Everything is not going to be all right" 

and he saw the problems that we were going into not as his problem, not as Jesse's personal problem or my personal problem, but America's problem. But he felt that the only thing that could save us was us working together to try to really and truly redeem the soul of America.

MARSHALL FRADY
That angry challenge was the last substantive thing Martin Luther King said to Jesse Jackson.

ANDREW YOUNG
No, it - and he's never forgotten it.


Senator Bulworth: You know who Huey Newton was?

Nina: (slowly she nods her head) Yes.

Senator Bulworth: You know a lotta people I talk to, the blacks your age, they have no idea who he was. 

(long pause) 

Huey. 

(long pause) 

Why do you think there are no more black leaders?

Nina: Some people think it's because they all got killed. 

But I think it's got more to do with the decimation of the manufacturing base in the urban centers. 

Senator, an optimistic population throws up optimistic, energized leaders. And when you shift manufacturing to the Sun Belt in the Third World, you destroy the blue-collar core of the black activist population.

Some people would say that problem is purely cultural. 

The power of the media that is continually controlled by fewer and fewer people, add to that the monopoly of the media, a consumer culture based on self-gratification, and you're not likely to have a population that want's leadership that calls for self-sacrifice.

But the fact is, I'm just a materialist at heart. 

But if I look at the economic base, higher domestic employment means jobs for African Americans. World War II meant lots of jobs for black folks. That is what energized the community for the civil rights movement of the 50's and the 60's. 

An energized, hopeful community will not only produce leaders but more importantly it'll produce leaders they'll respond to. 

Now what do you think, Senator?


Bulworth: Maybe it's because they just all got killed.



"You can kill my body, and you can take my life but you can never kill my soul. My soul will live forever!"
Last words of Huey P. Newton, 1989

"When I was a young boy, 
My father took me into the city, 
To see a marching band.

He said, 'Son, when you grow up, 
Will you be the saviour of the broken? 
The beaten and the damned...?'

He said, 'Will you defeat them?
Your demons and and the non-believers?
The plans that they've made....'"



Welcome to The Black Parade.





The March on Washington represented a coalition of several civil rights organizations, all of which generally had different approaches and different agendas. 

The "Big Six" organizers were: 

James Farmer, of the Congress of Racial Equality (CORE); 

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC); 

John Lewis, of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC); 

A. Philip Randolph, of the Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters; 

Roy Wilkins, of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP); 

and Whitney Young, Jr., of the National Urban League.




Gerard Way was working as an intern for Cartoon Network in New York City during the September 11, 2001 attacks. Seeing the effects of the attacks first-hand prompted Way to change his views on life in the following weeks. 



He told Spin magazine, 

"I literally said to myself, 'Fuck art. I’ve gotta get out of the basement. I’ve gotta see the world. I’ve gotta make a difference.'"

To help deal with the emotional effects the attacks had on him, Way wrote the lyrics to the song "Skylines and Turnstiles".



In many interviews, Way has stated that music turned out to be an effective outlet to deal with his longtime battles against depression, alcoholism and prescription drug abuse







On 4 February 1968, Martin Luther King, Jr. preached ‘‘The Drum Major Instinct’’ from the pulpit of Ebenezer Baptist Church. 



Ironically, two months before his assassination on 4 April 1968, he told his congregation what he would like said at his funeral: 


‘‘I’d like for somebody to say that day that Martin Luther King, Jr., tried to love somebody’’ 


(King, ‘‘The Drum Major,’’ 185). 


Excerpts were played at King’s nationally televised funeral service, held at Ebenezer on 9 April 1968.



This morning I would like to use as a subject from which to preach: "The Drum Major Instinct." "The Drum Major Instinct." And our text for the morning is taken from a very familiar passage in the tenth chapter as recorded by Saint Mark. Beginning with the thirty-fifth verse of that chapter, we read these words: "And James and John, the sons of Zebedee, came unto him saying, ‘Master, we would that thou shouldest do for us whatsoever we shall desire.’ And he said unto them, ‘What would ye that I should do for you?’ And they said unto him, ‘Grant unto us that we may sit, one on thy right hand, and the other on thy left hand, in thy glory.’ But Jesus said unto them, ‘Ye know not what ye ask: Can ye drink of the cup that I drink of? and be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with?’ And they said unto him, ‘We can.’ And Jesus said unto them, ‘Ye shall indeed drink of the cup that I drink of, and with the baptism that I am baptized withal shall ye be baptized: but to sit on my right hand and on my left hand is not mine to give; but it shall be given to them for whom it is prepared.’" And then Jesus goes on toward the end of that passage to say, "But so shall it not be among you: but whosoever will be great among you, shall be your servant: and whosoever of you will be the chiefest, shall be servant of all."


The setting is clear. James and John are making a specific request of the master. They had dreamed, as most of the Hebrews dreamed, of a coming king of Israel who would set Jerusalem free and establish his kingdom on Mount Zion, and in righteousness rule the world. And they thought of Jesus as this kind of king. And they were thinking of that day when Jesus would reign supreme as this new king of Israel. And they were saying, "Now when you establish your kingdom, let one of us sit on the right hand and the other on the left hand of your throne."



Now very quickly, we would automatically condemn James and John, and we would say they were selfish. Why would they make such a selfish request? But before we condemn them too quickly, let us look calmly and honestly at ourselves, and we will discover that we too have those same basic desires for recognition, for importance. That same desire for attention, that same desire to be first. Of course, the other disciples got mad with James and John, and you could understand why, but we must understand that we have some of the same James and John qualities. And there is deep down within all of us an instinct. It's a kind of drum major instinct—a desire to be out front, a desire to lead the parade, a desire to be first. And it is something that runs the whole gamut of life.



And so before we condemn them, let us see that we all have the drum major instinct. We all want to be important, to surpass others, to achieve distinction, to lead the parade. Alfred Adler, the great psychoanalyst, contends that this is the dominant impulse. Sigmund Freud used to contend that sex was the dominant impulse, and Adler came with a new argument saying that this quest for recognition, this desire for attention, this desire for distinction is the basic impulse, the basic drive of human life, this drum major instinct.

And you know, we begin early to ask life to put us first. Our first cry as a baby was a bid for attention. And all through childhood the drum major impulse or instinct is a major obsession. Children ask life to grant them first place. They are a little bundle of ego. And they have innately the drum major impulse or the drum major instinct.


Now in adult life, we still have it, and we really never get by it. We like to do something good. And you know, we like to be praised for it. Now if you don't believe that, you just go on living life, and you will discover very soon that you like to be praised. Everybody likes it, as a matter of fact. And somehow this warm glow we feel when we are praised or when our name is in print is something of the vitamin A to our ego. Nobody is unhappy when they are praised, even if they know they don't deserve it and even if they don't believe it. The only unhappy people about praise is when that praise is going too much toward somebody else. (That’s right) But everybody likes to be praised because of this real drum major instinct.



Now the presence of the drum major instinct is why so many people are "joiners." You know, there are some people who just join everything. And it's really a quest for attention and recognition and importance. And they get names that give them that impression. So you get your groups, and they become the "Grand Patron," and the little fellow who is henpecked at home needs a chance to be the "Most Worthy of the Most Worthy" of something. It is the drum major impulse and longing that runs the gamut of human life. And so we see it everywhere, this quest for recognition. And we join things, overjoin really, that we think that we will find that recognition in.



Now the presence of this instinct explains why we are so often taken by advertisers. You know, those gentlemen of massive verbal persuasion. And they have a way of saying things to you that kind of gets you into buying. In order to be a man of distinction, you must drink this whiskey. In order to make your neighbors envious, you must drive this type of car. (Make it plain) In order to be lovely to love you must wear this kind of lipstick or this kind of perfume. And you know, before you know it, you're just buying that stuff. (Yes) That's the way the advertisers do it.



I got a letter the other day, and it was a new magazine coming out. And it opened up, "Dear Dr. King: As you know, you are on many mailing lists. And you are categorized as highly intelligent, progressive, a lover of the arts and the sciences, and I know you will want to read what I have to say." Of course I did. After you said all of that and explained me so exactly, of course I wanted to read it. [laughter]

But very seriously, it goes through life; the drum major instinct is real. (Yes) And you know what else it causes to happen? It often causes us to live above our means. (Make it plain) It's nothing but the drum major instinct. Do you ever see people buy cars that they can't even begin to buy in terms of their income? (Amen) [laughter] You've seen people riding around in Cadillacs and Chryslers who don't earn enough to have a good T-Model Ford. (Make it plain) But it feeds a repressed ego.


You know, economists tell us that your automobile should not cost more than half of your annual income. So if you make an income of five thousand dollars, your car shouldn't cost more than about twenty-five hundred. That's just good economics. And if it's a family of two, and both members of the family make ten thousand dollars, they would have to make out with one car. That would be good economics, although it's often inconvenient. But so often, haven't you seen people making five thousand dollars a year and driving a car that costs six thousand? And they wonder why their ends never meet. [laughter] That's a fact.



Now the economists also say that your house shouldn't cost—if you're buying a house, it shouldn't cost more than twice your income. That's based on the economy and how you would make ends meet. So, if you have an income of five thousand dollars, it's kind of difficult in this society. But say it's a family with an income of ten thousand dollars, the house shouldn't cost much more than twenty thousand. Well, I've seen folk making ten thousand dollars, living in a forty- and fifty-thousand-dollar house. And you know they just barely make it. They get a check every month somewhere, and they owe all of that out before it comes in. Never have anything to put away for rainy days.



But now the problem is, it is the drum major instinct. And you know, you see people over and over again with the drum major instinct taking them over. And they just live their lives trying to outdo the Joneses. (Amen) They got to get this coat because this particular coat is a little better and a little better-looking than Mary's coat. And I got to drive this car because it's something about this car that makes my car a little better than my neighbor's car. (Amen) I know a man who used to live in a thirty-five-thousand-dollar house. And other people started building thirty-five-thousand-dollar houses, so he built a seventy-five-thousand-dollar house. And then somebody else built a seventy-five-thousand-dollar house, and he built a hundred-thousand-dollar house. And I don't know where he's going to end up if he's going to live his life trying to keep up with the Joneses.



There comes a time that the drum major instinct can become destructive. (Make it plain) And that's where I want to move now. I want to move to the point of saying that if this instinct is not harnessed, it becomes a very dangerous, pernicious instinct. For instance, if it isn’t harnessed, it causes one's personality to become distorted. I guess that's the most damaging aspect of it: what it does to the personality. If it isn't harnessed, you will end up day in and day out trying to deal with your ego problem by boasting. Have you ever heard people that—you know, and I'm sure you've met them—that really become sickening because they just sit up all the time talking about themselves. (Amen) And they just boast and boast and boast, and that's the person who has not harnessed the drum major instinct.



And then it does other things to the personality. It causes you to lie about who you know sometimes. (Amen, Make it plain) There are some people who are influence peddlers. And in their attempt to deal with the drum major instinct, they have to try to identify with the so-called big-name people. (Yeah, Make it plain) And if you're not careful, they will make you think they know somebody that they don't really know. (Amen) They know them well, they sip tea with them, and they this-and-that. That happens to people.



And the other thing is that it causes one to engage ultimately in activities that are merely used to get attention. Criminologists tell us that some people are driven to crime because of this drum major instinct. They don't feel that they are getting enough attention through the normal channels of social behavior, and so they turn to anti-social behavior in order to get attention, in order to feel important. (Yeah) And so they get that gun, and before they know it they robbed a bank in a quest for recognition, in a quest for importance.



And then the final great tragedy of the distorted personality is the fact that when one fails to harness this instinct, (Glory to God) he ends up trying to push others down in order to push himself up. (Amen) And whenever you do that, you engage in some of the most vicious activities. You will spread evil, vicious, lying gossip on people, because you are trying to pull them down in order to push yourself up. (Make it plain) And the great issue of life is to harness the drum major instinct.



Now the other problem is, when you don't harness the drum major instinct—this uncontrolled aspect of it—is that it leads to snobbish exclusivism. It leads to snobbish exclusivism. (Make it plain) And you know, this is the danger of social clubs and fraternities—I'm in a fraternity; I'm in two or three—for sororities and all of these, I'm not talking against them. I'm saying it's the danger. The danger is that they can become forces of classism and exclusivism where somehow you get a degree of satisfaction because you are in something exclusive. And that's fulfilling something, you know—that I'm in this fraternity, and it's the best fraternity in the world, and everybody can't get in this fraternity. So it ends up, you know, a very exclusive kind of thing.



And you know, that can happen with the church; I know churches get in that bind sometimes. (Amen, Make it plain) I've been to churches, you know, and they say, "We have so many doctors, and so many school teachers, and so many lawyers, and so many businessmen in our church." And that's fine, because doctors need to go to church, and lawyers, and businessmen, teachers—they ought to be in church. But they say that—even the preacher sometimes will go all through that—they say that as if the other people don't count. 



(Amen)



And the church is the one place where a doctor ought to forget that he's a doctor. The church is the one place where a Ph.D. ought to forget that he's a Ph.D. (Yes) The church is the one place that the school teacher ought to forget the degree she has behind her name. The church is the one place where the lawyer ought to forget that he's a lawyer. And any church that violates the "whosoever will, let him come" doctrine is a dead, cold church, (Yes) and nothing but a little social club with a thin veneer of religiosity.



When the church is true to its nature, (Whoo) it says, "Whosoever will, let him come." (Yes) And it does not supposed to satisfy the perverted uses of the drum major instinct. It's the one place where everybody should be the same, standing before a common master and savior. (Yes, sir) And a recognition grows out of this—that all men are brothers because they are children (Yes) of a common father.



The drum major instinct can lead to exclusivism in one's thinking and can lead one to feel that because he has some training, he's a little better than that person who doesn't have it. Or because he has some economic security, that he's a little better than that person who doesn't have it. And that's the uncontrolled, perverted use of the drum major instinct.



Now the other thing is, that it leads to tragic—and we've seen it happen so often—tragic race prejudice. Many who have written about this problem—Lillian Smith used to say it beautifully in some of her books. 



And she would say it to the point of getting men and women to see the source of the problem. Do you know that a lot of the race problem grows out of the drum major instinct? A need that some people have to feel superior. A need that some people have to feel that they are first, and to feel that their white skin ordained them to be first. (Make it plain, today, ‘cause I’m against it, so help me God) And they have said over and over again in ways that we see with our own eyes. In fact, not too long ago, a man down in Mississippi said that God was a charter member of the White Citizens Council. And so God being the charter member means that everybody who's in that has a kind of divinity, a kind of superiority. And think of what has happened in history as a result of this perverted use of the drum major instinct. It has led to the most tragic prejudice, the most tragic expressions of man's inhumanity to man.



The other day I was saying, I always try to do a little converting when I'm in jail. And when we were in jail in Birmingham the other day, the white wardens and all enjoyed coming around the cell to talk about the race problem. And they were showing us where we were so wrong demonstrating. And they were showing us where segregation was so right. And they were showing us where intermarriage was so wrong. So I would get to preaching, and we would get to talking—calmly, because they wanted to talk about it. And then we got down one day to the point—that was the second or third day—to talk about where they lived, and how much they were earning. And when those brothers told me what they were earning, I said, "Now, you know what? You ought to be marching with us. [laughter] You're just as poor as Negroes." And I said, "You are put in the position of supporting your oppressor, because through prejudice and blindness, you fail to see that the same forces that oppress Negroes in American society oppress poor white people. (Yes) And all you are living on is the satisfaction of your skin being white, and the drum major instinct of thinking that you are somebody big because you are white. And you're so poor you can't send your children to school. You ought to be out here marching with every one of us every time we have a march."



Now that's a fact. That the poor white has been put into this position, where through blindness and prejudice, (Make it plain) he is forced to support his oppressors. And the only thing he has going for him is the false feeling that he’s superior because his skin is white—and can't hardly eat and make his ends meet week in and week out. (Amen)



And not only does this thing go into the racial struggle, it goes into the struggle between nations. And I would submit to you this morning that what is wrong in the world today is that the nations of the world are engaged in a bitter, colossal contest for supremacy. And if something doesn't happen to stop this trend, I'm sorely afraid that we won't be here to talk about Jesus Christ and about God and about brotherhood too many more years. (Yeah) If somebody doesn't bring an end to this suicidal thrust that we see in the world today, none of us are going to be around, because somebody's going to make the mistake through our senseless blunderings of dropping a nuclear bomb somewhere. And then another one is going to drop. And don't let anybody fool you, this can happen within a matter of seconds. (Amen) They have twenty-megaton bombs in Russia right now that can destroy a city as big as New York in three seconds, with everybody wiped away, and every building. And we can do the same thing to Russia and China.



But this is why we are drifting. And we are drifting there because nations are caught up with the drum major instinct. "I must be first." "I must be supreme." "Our nation must rule the world." (Preach it) And I am sad to say that the nation in which we live is the supreme culprit. And I'm going to continue to say it to America, because I love this country too much to see the drift that it has taken.



God didn't call America to do what she's doing in the world now. (Preach it, preach it) God didn't call America to engage in a senseless, unjust war as the war in Vietnam. And we are criminals in that war. We’ve committed more war crimes almost than any nation in the world, and I'm going to continue to say it. And we won't stop it because of our pride and our arrogance as a nation.



But God has a way of even putting nations in their place. (Amen) The God that I worship has a way of saying, "Don't play with me." (Yes) He has a way of saying, as the God of the Old Testament used to say to the Hebrews, "Don’t play with me, Israel. Don't play with me, Babylon. (Yes) Be still and know that I'm God. And if you don't stop your reckless course, I'll rise up and break the backbone of your power." (Yes) And that can happen to America. (Yes) Every now and then I go back and read Gibbons' Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. And when I come and look at America, I say to myself, the parallels are frightening. And we have perverted the drum major instinct.



But let me rush on to my conclusion, because I want you to see what Jesus was really saying. What was the answer that Jesus gave these men? It's very interesting. One would have thought that Jesus would have condemned them. One would have thought that Jesus would have said, "You are out of your place. You are selfish. Why would you raise such a question?"



But that isn't what Jesus did; he did something altogether different. He said in substance, "Oh, I see, you want to be first. You want to be great. You want to be important. You want to be significant. Well, you ought to be. If you're going to be my disciple, you must be." But he reordered priorities. And he said, "Yes, don't give up this instinct. It's a good instinct if you use it right. (Yes) It's a good instinct if you don't distort it and pervert it. Don't give it up. Keep feeling the need for being important. Keep feeling the need for being first. But I want you to be first in love. (Amen) I want you to be first in moral excellence. I want you to be first in generosity. That is what I want you to do."



And he transformed the situation by giving a new definition of greatness. And you know how he said it? He said, "Now brethren, I can't give you greatness. And really, I can't make you first." This is what Jesus said to James and John. "You must earn it. True greatness comes not by favoritism, but by fitness. And the right hand and the left are not mine to give, they belong to those who are prepared." (Amen)


And so Jesus gave us a new norm of greatness. If you want to be important—wonderful. If you want to be recognized—wonderful. If you want to be great—wonderful. But recognize that he who is greatest among you shall be your servant. (Amen) That's a new definition of greatness.


And this morning, the thing that I like about it: by giving that definition of greatness, it means that everybody can be great, (Everybody) because everybody can serve. (Amen) You don't have to have a college degree to serve. (All right) You don't have to make your subject and your verb agree to serve. You don't have to know about Plato and Aristotle to serve. You don't have to know Einstein's theory of relativity to serve. You don't have to know the second theory of thermodynamics in physics to serve. (Amen) You only need a heart full of grace, (Yes, sir, Amen) a soul generated by love. (Yes) And you can be that servant.



I know a man—and I just want to talk about him a minute, and maybe you will discover who I'm talking about as I go down the way (Yeah) because he was a great one. And he just went about serving. He was born in an obscure village, (Yes, sir) the child of a poor peasant woman. And then he grew up in still another obscure village, where he worked as a carpenter until he was thirty years old. (Amen) Then for three years, he just got on his feet, and he was an itinerant preacher. And he went about doing some things. He didn't have much. He never wrote a book. He never held an office. He never had a family. (Yes) He never owned a house. He never went to college. He never visited a big city. He never went two hundred miles from where he was born. He did none of the usual things that the world would associate with greatness. He had no credentials but himself.



He was only thirty-three when the tide of public opinion turned against him. They called him a rabble-rouser. They called him a troublemaker. They said he was an agitator. (Glory to God) He practiced civil disobedience; he broke injunctions. And so he was turned over to his enemies and went through the mockery of a trial. And the irony of it all is that his friends turned him over to them. (Amen) One of his closest friends denied him. Another of his friends turned him over to his enemies. And while he was dying, the people who killed him gambled for his clothing, the only possession that he had in the world. (Lord help him) When he was dead he was buried in a borrowed tomb, through the pity of a friend.



Nineteen centuries have come and gone and today he stands as the most influential figure that ever entered human history. All of the armies that ever marched, all the navies that ever sailed, all the parliaments that ever sat, and all the kings that ever reigned put together (Yes) have not affected the life of man on this earth (Amen) as much as that one solitary life. His name may be a familiar one. (Jesus) But today I can hear them talking about him. Every now and then somebody says, "He's King of Kings." (Yes) And again I can hear somebody saying, "He's Lord of Lords." Somewhere else I can hear somebody saying, "In Christ there is no East nor West." (Yes) And then they go on and talk about, "In Him there's no North and South, but one great Fellowship of Love throughout the whole wide world." He didn't have anything. (Amen) He just went around serving and doing good.



This morning, you can be on his right hand and his left hand if you serve. (Amen) It's the only way in.

Every now and then I guess we all think realistically (Yes, sir) about that day when we will be victimized with what is life's final common denominator—that something that we call death. We all think about it. And every now and then I think about my own death and I think about my own funeral. And I don't think of it in a morbid sense. And every now and then I ask myself, "What is it that I would want said?" And I leave the word to you this morning.


If any of you are around when I have to meet my day, I don’t want a long funeral. And if you get somebody to deliver the eulogy, tell them not to talk too long. (Yes) And every now and then I wonder what I want them to say. Tell them not to mention that I have a Nobel Peace Prize—that isn’t important. Tell them not to mention that I have three or four hundred other awards—that’s not important. Tell them not to mention where I went to school. (Yes)



I'd like somebody to mention that day that Martin Luther King, Jr., tried to give his life serving others. (Yes)

I'd like for somebody to say that day that Martin Luther King, Jr., tried to love somebody.


I want you to say that day that I tried to be right on the war question. (Amen)



I want you to be able to say that day that I did try to feed the hungry. (Yes)



And I want you to be able to say that day that I did try in my life to clothe those who were naked. (Yes)



I want you to say on that day that I did try in my life to visit those who were in prison. (Lord)



I want you to say that I tried to love and serve humanity. (Yes)



Yes, if you want to say that I was a drum major, say that I was a drum major for justice. (Amen) Say that I was a drum major for peace. (Yes) I was a drum major for righteousness. And all of the other shallow things will not matter. (Yes) I won't have any money to leave behind. I won't have the fine and luxurious things of life to leave behind. But I just want to leave a committed life behind. (Amen) And that's all I want to say.

If I can help somebody as I pass along,
If I can cheer somebody with a word or song,
If I can show somebody he's traveling wrong,
Then my living will not be in vain.
If I can do my duty as a Christian ought,
If I can bring salvation to a world once wrought,
If I can spread the message as the master taught,
Then my living will not be in vain.

Yes, Jesus, I want to be on your right or your left side, (Yes) not for any selfish reason. I want to be on your right or your left side, not in terms of some political kingdom or ambition. But I just want to be there in love and in justice and in truth and in commitment to others, so that we can make of this old world a new world.

Saturday 18 January 2014

UK Government Policy Papers of ChemTrails and GeoEngineering




“HAARP is a weapon of mass destruction, capable of destabilising agricultural and ecological systems globally.”

“‘Climatic warfare’ potentially threatens the future of humanity, but has casually been excluded from the reports for which the IPCC received the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize.”

Weather Warfare by Michel Chossudovsky, The Ecologist, December 2007 



Memorandum 152

Submission from John C D Nissen

SUMMARY
    -  Gravity of situation-global warming poses a threat to the survival of human civilisation.
    -  State of denial-few scientists are prepared to admit that there is an issue of survival.
    -  Role of geoengineering-it has the capability to save the day.
    -  Different types of geoengineering-reflecting sunlight and sequestration.
    -  Saving the Arctic sea ice-reflecting sunlight using stratospheric aerosols and reflecting sunlight through tropospheric cloud brightening are most promising.
    -  Removing CO2 from the atmosphere-biochar has great potential.
    -  Geoengineering discipline-understand the climate science.
    -  Research and deployment-need for an engineering mentality and leadership.
    -  Response from government-nobody alert to the dangers.
    -  Conclusion-experimental trials of geoengineering with stratospheric aerosols and cloud brightening are urgently needed.
1.  GRAVITY OF THE SITUATION
  1.  The earth's climate system shows signs of tipping into a new super-hot state (over 6°C warming), with barren lands, sterile seas, mass extinctions, a huge rise in sea level and almost inevitably the collapse of human civilisation. Over the past century, the earth's energy balance has been disturbed by a growing pulse of anthropogenic greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, now more than sufficient to tip the system. Even if one could halt all CO2 emissions overnight, the acceleration of global warming towards the super-hot state would continue.
  2.  On top of this, there are growing positive feedbacks on global warming, acting both directly and indirectly: 
    -  global warming melts snow and ice, allowing greater absorption of sunlight, with the effect of increasing global warming directly;
    -  global warming melts permafrost and frozen bogs, releasing CO2 and methane to increase global warming indirectly; and
    -  global warming warms the oceans, reducing their CO2 absorption capability, thus increasing CO2 lifetime in the atmosphere, to increase global warming indirectly.
  3.  But global warming is not the only problem. If one could halt it overnight, the growing CO2 levels would eventually lead to sterile seas through ocean acidification, already considered a serious problem for shell-forming creatures.
2.  STATE OF DENIAL
  4.  What is not generally appreciated among non-scientists is the seriousness of the situation with global warming. Scientists themselves do not want to believe what they are seeing, and certainly don't want to make others feel as scared as they may feel themselves. They shelter behind a cosy but false consensus, such as set up by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which ignored the strong positive feedback in the climate system, especially the feedback resulting from Arctic sea ice retreat, thus giving us absurdly optimistic forecasts.[15] The real possibility of the Arctic Ocean becoming ice free in summer 2013, or sooner, is still not accepted by the Hadley Centre. Thus the sources of advice for the government are not stressing how immediate the danger is, nor how absolutely catastrophic it would be if we do not successfully counter the threat over the next few years. Martin Parry, ex-chair of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, has said that "survival is not the issue", but that's exactly what it is.
3.  ROLE OF GEOENGINEERING
  5.  We define geoengineering as engineering on a large scale intended to:
    -  halt or reverse the rise in levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere; and
    -  halt or reverse the effects of excess greenhouse gases in the atmosphere: global warming, increased climate variability, sea level rise, and ocean acidification.
  6.  The immediate goal of geoengineering must be to halt the summer retreat of Arctic sea ice, since this cannot be done by emissions reductions alone. The long term goal must be to stabilise the climate and counter ocean acidification. Fortunately at least one geoengineering technique has the capability of success for both goals, and at remarkably low cost.
4.  DIFFERENT TYPES OF GEOENGINEERING
  7.  There are two principle types of geoengineering: 
    -  solar radiation management (SRM) for cooling; and
    -  sequestration methods, including carbon capture and storage (CCS), for removing CO2 from the atmosphere.
  8.  Solar radiation management involves techniques to reflect solar energy back into space, typically using fine particles or aerosols in the atmosphere, but it can include techniques such as painting roofs and covering deserts with reflective material. 
  9.  Sequestration generally involves absorbing CO2 from the atmosphere by photosynthesis of plants or marine creatures and then burying the carbon. This kind of geoengineering can embrace agricultural practice, bioengineering, genetic engineering, chemical engineering, constructional engineering and marine engineering to achieve particular goals.
  Thus geoengineering covers an enormously wide range of disciplines.
5.  SAVING THE ARCTIC SEA ICE
  10.  The halting the summer retreat of Arctic sea ice can be addressed by solar radiation management, but also some other techniques. There is so much at stake (including our own survival) that I believe we should pull out all the stops to restore the sea ice. We should try anything that:
    -  can be scaled up to have a significant positive impact;
    -  can be scaled up within two or three years;
    -  has a low chance of significant negative impact; and
    -  can be stopped before any unexpected negative impact becomes significant.
  11.  So main candidates include:
    (i) creating stratospheric clouds-using precursor injection to generate aerosols;
    (ii creating contrails-using an additive to aircraft fuel; and
    (iii) brightening of marine clouds over the North Sea to cool the surface water entering the Arctic Ocean.
  12.  These all involve solar radiation management. They are all remarkably cheap to deploy, and one might only need a few million pounds to start significant experimental trials. The eventual cost for the stratospheric cloud technique has been estimated as of the order of $1 billion per annum to counter the full effects of global warming over the next few decades.
  13.  Other possibilities for saving the sea ice include:
    (iv) covering of sea ice and adjacent land with reflective material;
    (v) covering of ice and adjacent land with fresh snow to increase reflection;
    (vi) prevention or removal of shrub growth in Siberia;
    (vii) creation of thicker sea ice, using ice breakers;
    (viii) prevention of break-up of ice, and its transport into open water;
    (ix) covering of sea and meltwater with floating reflective material;
    (x) removal of meltwater; and
    (xi) cooling of the sea water by increase thermal radiation into space.
  14.  However, these other possibilities all have practical problems, mainly of being scaled up quickly enough to have a significant impact in saving the Arctic sea ice.
  15.  Concerning the main three candidates, the creation of stratospheric aerosol clouds (to simulate the global cooling effect over several years of a large volcanic eruption such as that of Mount Pinatubo) has the greatest backing among the geoengineering community, and should be a top priority for immediate experimental trials. A seminal paper on this subject by Ken Caldeira et al[16] is included in the recent Royal Society Phil Trans special issue on geoengineering. The scientific aspects are well considered, and much modelling has been done. However no experimental work has been done (eg on obtaining an ideal droplet size), and this is needed as a matter of extreme urgency.
  16.  The creation of contrails can be regarded as simply reversing what has been done by removal of certain constituents ("impurities") of aviation fuel in order to reduce atmospheric pollution. For example, sulphur compounds could be reintroduced into the fuel tanks of fighter aircraft, which would produce a contrail diffusing to a haze. This would have a known net cooling effect (significantly greater for daytime flights). This technique could supplement the abovementioned solar radiation management from aerosol clouds in the stratosphere.
  17.  The brightening of marine clouds is the subject of paper by John Latham et al in the Royal Society special issue. Some early experimentation in the formation of the spray is urgently required. Once this has been mastered, it could be deployed immediately by ordinary ships plying the North Atlantic to start cooling that part of the Gulf Stream entering the Arctic Ocean off the west coast of Norway. This would slow the melting of sea ice in summer, and speed the reformation of sea ice in winter. A significant amount of heat is transported into the Arctic via the Gulf Stream. This transport is implicated in the positive feedback on GW as the mean annual sea ice extent reduces.
6.  REMOVING CO2 FROM THE ATMOSPHERE
  18.  This is just a brief note, to say that Biochar techniques have remarkable potential for application in agriculture all over the world, to the benefit of farmers as well as the environment. Research and deployment should be supported by the government.
7.  GEOENGINEERING DISCIPLINE
  19.  As you will see from section 4, geoengineering covers an enormously wide range of disciplines. It is not clear that geoengineering should be treated as a discipline in its own right. Anyhow it is early days-there are very few people who would call themselves geo-engineers. What is important is that every engineer should understand the climate science that makes geoengineering essential.
8.  RESEARCH AND DEPLOYMENT
  20.  Up till now, nearly all work on the climate has been done by academic scientists, who will want to continue research and modelling. There is a desperate lack of engineers, and an engineering mentality, to take the geoengineering possibilities and turn them into practicalities. And there is an absolute lack of leadership from the government. This has to change, and change dramatically, considering the gravity of the situation we are in (see section 1).
9.  RESPONSE FROM THE GOVERNMENT
  21.  Letters have been sent to ministers by myself, on behalf of stratospheric aerosol engineering, and by Stephen Salter, on behalf of cloud brightening. In every case the letters have been answered by officials from DEFRA who refuse to pass on the letters to politicians, despite the gravity of the situation we have described. These officials have raised many objections to our proposals, which we have been able to counter in every case. Yet still they refuse to accept the situation we describe, and the urgency for experimental trials of the geoengineering techniques we espouse. Not to use geoengineering, when it could rescue the world from the effects of global warming, is surely both stupid and irresponsible.
10.  CONCLUSION
  22.  The most pressing need is for experimental trials of stratospheric aerosols, and cloud brightening techniques. Between them, these geoengineering techniques could save the Arctic sea ice, and thereby prevent a chain reaction of events leading to Armageddon. The same techniques could also be used to halt global warming and avoid the considerable costs of adaptation which have been widely anticipated (and thought inevitable).
September 2008







15   IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change Science http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1-spm.pdf "Sea ice is projected to shrink in both the Arctic and Antarctic under all SRES scenarios. In some projections, Arctic late-summer sea ice disappears almost entirely by the latter part of the 21st century. (10.3)". Back


Memorandum 155
Submission from John Gorman, Chartered Engineer

GEOENGINEERING FOR ZERO SEA LEVEL RISE
Summary
  1.  Sea level will probably rise more quickly and much more than the IPCC estimate of 40 centimetres by 2100. 
  2.  The implications for London are obvious. 
  3.  No reduction in CO2 emissions can avoid or significantly reduce sea level rise this century.
  4.  The only way to control sea level rise is screening of solar radiation (geoengineering).
  5.  There is very little geoengineering research because it is not "politically correct" in the climate academic community.
  6.  There are very practical well-defined research projects in geoengineering that need funding.
  7.  If shown to be technically feasible there are very practical proposals for implementation.
1.  SEA LEVEL RISE
  1.1  In most of the world there is not yet much negative effect of global warming. The danger lies in the Arctic and Antarctic where the temperature rise is about 10 times as great as that at the equator. Currently it is 3 to 4° compared with the global average figure of 0.7° (British Antarctic Survey position statement and IPCC.) The result is very significant summer melting of Greenland and the Antarctic Peninsula (which protrude outside the Arctic and Antarctic Circle respectively.) This summer melting is far greater than has occurred at any time since the end the last ice age. (British Antarctic Survey)
  1.2  Common sense and many anecdotal reports suggest that this will eventually result in the loss of much of these two ice sheets. (Not the main body of Antarctica where there is at present no summer melting.) This would result in a sea level rise of about 16 metres. The question is how quickly this could occur. This is obviously difficult to estimate. The predicted sea level rise in the IPCC report from March 2007 is 40 centimetres by 2100. This was widely publicised as was the fact that this figure had been reduced from that in the previous report.
  1.3  Where does this figure of 40 centimetres come from?
  In a nutshell it is the actual rise in the decade to 2003 multiplied by 10 for the 10 decades to 2100. (Which would give 31 centimetres +7 so 40 is slightly greater.)
  This raises two questions:
    (i) The average rise in the previous three decades was 1.4 centimetres per decade. This rose to 3.1 in the decade to 2003. Is there any reason to believe that subsequent decades in the century will stay at four centimetres per decade? Isn't it far more likely that there will be a rapid escalation as temperatures rise?
    (ii) These are still small rises resulting from an increase in the same mechanisms, such as surface water runoff in summer, which are occurring today. Can we have any confidence that much more dramatic events will not occur such as rapid glacial acceleration following ice shelf breakaway? These are mentioned in the IPCC report but no allowance is made for them in the "executive summary figure" of 40 centimetres.
  1.4  Many such possibilities are considered in the report (chapter five IPCC2007) and the difficulty in prediction is frequently mentioned. This difficulty in prediction is exemplified by the loss of Arctic Sea ice in summer. The IPCC median prediction was only a 22% loss by 2100 in the report published in March 2007. This figure was actually equalled in the summer of 2007! Many are now predicting total loss of Arctic summer sea ice as early as 2013-more than century earlier than the IPCC prediction. This loss of reflectivity (albedo) in the whole of the Arctic Ocean is obviously of enormous importance to the survival of the Greenland ice sheet.
  1.5  It seems irresponsible of the IPCC to allow such credence to be given to the figure of 40 centimetres. It would have been far better to say "we cannot predict sea level rise". The New Scientist suggested in the issue of 10 March 2007 that there was political pressure to stop any alarmist comment or figure being included. (See page 9-Copy of leader page.) 
  1.6  The truth is that, with the summer melting that is occurring in Greenland and the Antarctic Peninsula, and the loss of the Arctic Sea ice we haven't a clue how much or how quickly sea level will rise. If it is a slow and progressive rise, but quicker than we plan or build for, then the problems will always arise with a combination of high tide and exceptional storm as demonstrated in Burma recently. The same combination resulted in the flooding of New Orleans, of the English east coast in 1953 and very nearly of Rotterdam and London only last summer. The flood defences in Rotterdam would have been overwhelmed by another six inches of storm surge.
  1.7  When you look at the man-millennia that went into the evaluation of sea level rise worldwide from 1960 to 2003 it seems to be a bad case of "not seeing the wood for the trees" to allow the results to be extrapolated to 2100.
2.  LONDON
  2.1  It seems unnecessary to point out how susceptible London is to any sea level rise, which is not predicted or which occurs more quickly than new sea defences can be erected. 
  2.2  Sea level rise could be almost instantaneous. The Nobel laureate economist Thomas Schelling, in his lecture to the World Bank, mentions one particular ice shelf in Western Antarctica but there are many such examples. Because this ice shelf is resting on the bottom of the ocean it will result in sea level rise if it breaks away as is happening to so many bits of ice shelf in both Antarctica and the Arctic.
  2.3  In the lecture, Thomas Schelling also points out the danger in looking at the probability of such events. He suggests that the catastrophic nature means that we should prevent them if we possibly can and not apply economic cost benefit analysis.
3.  EMISSIONS REDUCTION
  3.1  It is important to realise that no reduction in CO2 emissions can stop sea level rise. If all CO2 emissions were stopped today we would still have a global warming problem in 100 and even 500 years (Caldera et al Recent paper) and Greenland would almost certainly be green. In fact most economists and those in business and politics see it as obvious that emissions will continue to rise for most of this century. The expected worldwide economic development (plus 500% by 2050-Reith lecture 2007) just can't be stopped.
  3.2  Even if a large emissions reduction could be achieved, the CO2 already in the atmosphere will last more than a century and its net heating effect will persist. Temperatures will therefore continue to rise. This could only be avoided if the CO2 concentration could be reduced now to pre-industrial levels, which is obviously impossible.
  3.3  In addition large-scale removal of CO2 from the atmosphere cannot help quickly because the technology simply doesn't exist yet.
  3.4  If emissions continue to rise, as seems inevitable, the escalating CO2 concentration will have to be controlled by CO2 removal and storage (CRS). This massive volume technology will have to be developed but this is not the subject of this paper.
4.  GEOENGINEERING
  4.1  The only tools that we have available to limit sea level rise come into the category of geoengineering. There are several ideas that could be implemented quickly. Among these is my suggestion of a stratospheric sunscreen created by an aircraft fuel additive. (I now find that this was first suggested by a Russian called Budyeko in 1980) but there are several others including the well researched proposal for Ocean cloud enhancement from Stephen Salter, Professor of Engineering at Edinburgh.
  4.2  Almost all of these geoengineering ideas aim at reflecting a proportion of the sunlight hitting the earth. Several ideas, including my own, are specifically aimed at the Arctic in order to stop sea level rise. Most rely on the "experiments" already done by nature in the form of volcanic eruptions. There have been 13 large volcanic eruptions in the last 250 years, which have given us invaluable information on the global cooling that can be achieved.
  4.3  None of these ideas are yet sufficiently well researched for immediate implementation but some of the ideas, including my own, could be implemented within one or two years. There are scientific voices claiming catastrophic consequences of such implementation but it is difficult to envisage consequences as catastrophic as allowing significant and unpredictable sea level rise.
  4.4  If the possibility of net loss from Arctic and Antarctic ice sheets can be eliminated by local geoengineering, then it should be possible to keep the total rise in sea level to zero.
  4.5  About half of the rise in the last decade (about 3 centimetres total) is attributable to ocean expansion on warming and the ocean cloud enhancement proposal from Professor Salter could stop further warming of the sea water if researched, developed and implemented.
5.  POLITICS
  5.1  Why aren't we hearing these suggestions from the climate experts who should be putting them forward?
  5.2  Any suggestion of geoengineering is very political among climate academics. Roger Pielke, an academic specialising in science policy summed up the situation very well saying:
    "some scientists think that scientists should not discuss the prospects for geoengineering because it will distract from other approaches to dealing with greenhouse gas emissions. Thus, decisions about what research to conduct and what is appropriate to discuss is shaped by the political preferences of scientists. This won't be news to scholars of science in society, but it should be troubling because it is unfortunately characteristic of the climate science community (who)-try to tilt the political playing field by altering what they allow their colleagues to work on or discuss in public. The climate debate has too much of this behavior already."
  5.3  Anyone who looks at the debate quickly comes to the same conclusion. Oliver Morton, news editor of Nature, investigated geoengineering last year and wrote "-the climate community views geoengineering with deep suspicion or outright hostility". He also saw that "climate scientists have shown new willingness to study (geoengineering) although many will do so-to show that all such paths are dead-end streets." 
  5.4  Even the Nobel laureate (for his work on CFCs and the ozone layer) Paul Crutzen couldn't get his geoengineering paper published without the intervention of Ralph Cicerone, the President of the American Academy of Sciences who wrote "many in the climate academic community have opposed the publication of Crutzen's work-for reasons that are not-scientific."
  5.5  Against this background there will need to be a strong political will to get proper, fully funded, research and development for several geoengineering schemes. Then there will need to be international political agreement on implementation. 
6.  GEOENGINEERING RESEARCH PROJECTS
  6.1  There is a tendency, particularly among climate academics, to speak of geoengineering as a last resort to be used "if disaster strikes". I have to describe this as a completely unrealistic attitude to the problem that is developing in Greenland and western Antarctica. The problem is obvious and won't go away. We should therefore set about correcting it now.
  6.2  There are geoengineering schemes, like mirrors in space, which might be interesting in the 22nd century, but at this moment stratospheric aerosols must be top of the list. From the 13 large volcanic eruptions since 1750, particularly from Mount Pinatubo in 1991, we already have masses of experimental data.
  6.3  Most of the research and evaluation papers concentrate on the quantities and the atmospheric and climatic effects of stratospheric aerosols. There are various suggestions for distribution but most of these are not detailed. If it could be shown that aircraft fuel additives could distribute aerosols without the need to develop any new equipment this would have enormous advantages in allowing experimental distribution to be done inexpensively and very soon.
6.4  An Actual Research Project
  6.4.1  I have recently proposed the following research project to Qinetiq (the former Royal Aircraft Establishment) but there is at present no available funding.
  6.4.2  Experiments using only static engine test rigs would go a long way to proving the practicality of the system at limited cost. The two chemicals suggested are di-methyl sulphide to produce sulphur dioxide and tetra ethyl silicate to produce silica. (I have already done some preliminary experiments.) 
  6.4.3  Most of the research on stratospheric aerosols concentrates on sulphur dioxide which produces an aerosol of sulphuric acid droplets. This is because it is sulphur dioxide that is produced from a volcanic eruption and gives us most of the data that we have on the cooling effects. There are various disadvantages to sulphur dioxide in its chemical activity and because of these it is worth investigating the silicon dioxide (silica) alternative. It might have far less chemical effect on the ozone. The particles might be crystalline platelets which would float for much longer in the atmosphere. The particles might be much more reflective requiring far less material to be injected. It might be possible to choose particle size and therefore to select the wavelength of light which is preferentially reflected. (An extra ultraviolet sunscreen!)
  6.4.4  If there is reason to believe that the turbine will be affected by the use of tetra ethyl silicate even in small concentrations then it would be nice to investigate the possibilities of injecting the fuel/additive mixture into an afterburner. It would be a pity to give up on the possibilities of silica particles and it is likely that initial atmospheric experiments would be done with military jets. Fighters using afterburners are well-known for using up the maximum amount of fuel in the minimum time and getting to the highest attitude.
6.5  Other Deserving Projects
  6.5.1  With a developing emergency of the global warming kind it is sensible to develop any feasible project in parallel so that sensible choices can be made at a later stage. One obvious candidate is the well researched proposal by Professor Salter of Edinburgh University to spray sea water into the lower clouds to enhance the reflectivity of ocean clouds and cool the oceans.
  6.5.2  This project would be least feasible in the freezing conditions of the Arctic and is therefore particularly compatible with the proposed use of stratospheric aerosols in the Arctic and Antarctic.
7.  IMPLEMENTATION
  7.1  It does seem sensible to have an application in mind in order to justify the preliminary experiments.
  7.2  Even among those proposing stratospheric aerosols there is scepticism as to whether aircraft fuel additives could be a distribution system. The doubts expressed include: 
    (i) aeroplanes don't fly high enough in the stratosphere;
    (ii) aerosols will fall out of the atmosphere too quickly;
    (iii) sulphur dioxide, which becomes sulphuric acid, will damage the ozone layer;
    (v) acid rain;
    (v) ozone layer damage will be particularly high in winter (Recent Simone Tilmes paper);
    (vi) aerosols will tend to cause high latitude warming in winter because of reflection of outgoing radiation during the longer nights relative to daytime; and
    (vii) damage to the jet engine.
  7.3  The most likely first application of a stratospheric aerosol sunscreen is that proposed by Gregory Benfold, a planetary atmospheric scientist at the University of California. The title was "Saving the Arctic". 
  7.4  Combined with the aircraft distribution system, the proposal would be to spread the aerosol by aircraft flying between 40 and 60,000 feet from the time of first Arctic daylight (April approximately) until late July approximately. 
  7.5  I believe that this would "slip" neatly between the various disadvantages mentioned in the following way:
  7.5.1  Doubts 1 and 2. Ideally for very long stratospheric life, aerosols need to be injected at about 80,000 feet. If they are only injected at 50,000 ft. they will fall out of the atmosphere in about three months. (Ken Caldera's lecture available on U tube). In this case that is exactly what we want so that they would fall out by the end of the Arctic summer and would not be present during the winter-solving 6. The aerosols will probably also be more effective, weight for weight, in the Arctic since there is no night during the summer when the night-time blanketing effect has to be subtracted from the daytime screening. 
  7.5.2  Most of the arguments that aerosols will damage the ozone layer assume that the aerosols are injected high in the stratosphere for long life. In this case most of the injection would not reach the ozone layer. In addition the aerosols would no longer be present in winter when the effect is greatest. (The damage to the ozone layer is not directly caused by the aerosols but by the aerosol droplets or particles forming nuclei on which the remaining CFCs have their chemical effect on the ozone. The level of CFCs in the atmosphere is dropping steadily now that controls are in place.)
  7.5.3  The problem of acid rain, 4 above, has always been a bit of a red herring because the quantity of sulphur dioxide needed is only of the order of one per cent of that produced by industrial processes worldwide. It could however be eliminated if the silica particle version was used.
  7.6  It seems very likely that implementation of this type would succeed in "saving the Arctic". In particular the target would be to eliminate significant melting of the Greenland ice sheet or sudden loss of parts of it. The same principle could then be applied to Antarctica.
  7.7  The target should be zero sea level rise. If this could be achieved the saving in costs of construction, relocating populations and flood disasters would be absolutely enormous.
  References have not been included in this paper. Most can be found in my poster/paper for the American Geophysical Union 2007 at http://www.naturaljointmobility.info/agu.htm 
September 2008




Memorandum 144

Submission from Stephen Salter, Emeritus Professor of Engineering Design, Institute for Energy Systems, University of Edinburgh

1.  SUMMARY
    -  At a recent energy conference Simon Vasey, trading manager of the major electricity provider Eon, said that while profits of billions of Euros had been made from the first round of the European carbon trading scheme not one kilogram of carbon had been abated.
    -  The monthly addition of points to the Keeling curve shows no reduction in the upward acceleration.
    -  Discussions of carbon emissions have used per nation rather than per capita data. A judicious choice of baseline date and the removal of shipping, aviation and the proxy carbon associated with imported goods has allowed at least one country to claim carbon reductions when in fact there has been an increase.
    -  The track record of the IPCC with regard to the timing of predicted events has been poor with several potential positive feed backs, such as the loss of Arctic ice, happening more rapidly than predicted in the earlier reports. People working for the IPCC report privately that there is intense pressure to modify wording from home governments.
    -  Ice core records show that have been many abrupt rises in world temperatures of a size and rate that would be catastrophic to a high world population. People who know a great deal about the problem and who have been studying it from the time when others thought it unimportant, now say that a sudden rise, perhaps at the next el Niño event, is likely and that, because the full effects of emissions lag their release, we may already be too late.
    -  Even if there are strong reasons for not deploying geo-engineering systems there is no case for not supporting vigorous research into every possible technique and for taking all feasible ones to the stage at which they could be rapidly deployed. This view is not yet shared by DEFRA and UK funding bodies.
    -  After 35 years work trying to develop renewable energy systems I now believe that it may not be possible to deploy enough of them quickly enough to prevent very serious consequences of climate change. For the last four years I have been working full time on the engineering design of one of the several possible techniques. The idea, due to John Latham, former Professor of Atmospheric Physics at the University of Manchester and now at the Centre for Atmospheric Research at Boulder Colorado, is to increase the reflection of solar energy from marine stratocumulus clouds by exploiting the well-accepted Twomey effect. Engineering drawings and design equations for a practical system are well advanced and can be made available to your Committee.
    -  Like everyone working in geo-engineering I do so with reluctance in the hope that it will not be needed but fearful that it may be needed with the greatest urgency.
2.  THE TWOMEY EFFECT
  1.  Twomey says that, for the same liquid water content, a large number of small drops will make a cloud reflect more than a small number of large drops. We would expect something like this from calculations of reflecting areas. We can see it with jars of glass balls of different sizes. We talk of dark storm clouds gathering when the drops become large enough to fall.
  2.  Even if the relative humidity goes above 100% a cloud drop cannot form without some form of condensation nucleus on which to grow. Over land there are plenty of suitable nuclei, 1,000 to 5,000 per cubic centimetre of air. But in clean mid ocean air the number is lower, often below 100 and some times as low as 10. In 1990 Latham proposed that the number of condensation nuclei could be increased by spraying sub-micron drops of sea water into the turbulent marine boundary layer. Initially the drops would evaporate quite quickly to leave a salty residue. Turbulence would mix these residues evenly through the marine boundary layer. Those that reached the clouds would provide ideal condensation nuclei and would grow to increase the reflecting area and so the cloud albedo.
  3.  The equations in Twomey's classic 1977 paper can be used to produce the graph below.

  4.  This follows the presentation used by Schwarz and Slingo (1996) and shows cloud top reflectivity for a typical liquid water content of 0.3 gm per cubic metre of air for a range of cloud depths as a function of drop concentration. The vertical bars show the range of drop concentrations suggested by Bennartz (2007) based on satellite observations.
  5.  If we know the initial cloud conditions, most especially the concentration of condensation nuclei, we can calculate how much spray will produce how much cooling. The method needs incoming sunshine, clean air, low cloud and the absence of high level cloud. The position of the best places varies with the seasons so sources should be mobile. Because the ratio of solar energy reflected to the surface-tension energy needed to generate drops is so large, it turns out that the spray quantities are quite practical. In the right conditions a spray source with a power rating of 150 kW can increase solar reflection by 2.3 TW, a ratio of 15 million. This is the sort of energy gain needed if humans are to attempt to influence climate.
3.  HARDWARE
  1.  The need to operate for long periods in mid-ocean and to migrate with the seasons points to a fleet of remotely operated wind-driven spray-vessels. These can obtain the electrical energy needed to make spray by dragging turbines like oversize propellers through the water. Thanks to satellite communications and navigation remote operation is now much easier. 
  2.  Rather than solve the robotic problems of handling ropes and textile sails we propose to use Flettner rotors. Flettner rotors offer much higher lift coefficients and lift drag ratios than sails or aircraft wings but their main attraction is that a computer can control the rotation speed of a cylinder far more easily that it can tie a reef knot. Anton Flettner built a ship, the Baden-Baden, which crossed the Atlantic in 1926. She won a race against a sister ship with a conventional rig and could sail 20 degrees closer to the wind. The weight of rotors was one quarter of the weight of the rig that they replaced. Flettner won orders for six ships and built one, only to have the orders cancelled because of the 1929 depression. Modern bearings with spherical freedom and materials like Kevlar and carbon-fibre would make rotors even more attractive. Enercon, the major German wind turbine maker launched a 10,000 tonne rotor assisted ship on 2 August 2008. The television company Discovery Channel has funded successful trials of a 34 foot yacht conversion. They also carried out an experiment at sea which confirmed expectations of the very high energy gain offered by the Twomey effect.
  3.  Design calculations and general arrangement drawing of the first spray vessel are well advanced. It has a waterline length of 45 metres and a displacement of 300 tonnes. Early vessels have space for a crew as well as the option to transfer control to an auto pilot and from land. Future ones may be a little smaller. All sensitive equipment is in hermetically sealed cylindrical canisters which can be individually and thoroughly tested on land and quickly exchanged. With three spray systems it will be possible to spray 30 kg a second as 0.8 micron drops. A fleet of 50 vessels in well-chosen places could cancel the thermal effects of the present annual increase of greenhouse gases. Work packages and costings for a five-year development programme which would provide a reliable tested design for the ocean going hardware are available. 
  4.  The change of cloud reflectivity necessary to stabilize global temperature despite a doubling of pre-industrial CO2 is about 1.1% globally or 6% if evenly spread in cloudy areas. The contrast-detection threshold for fuzzy irregular patterns is much higher, about 20%. It will be necessary to develop a method to convince non-technical decision makers that anything has changed. The spray generation modules have been designed so that one of them can be fastened to the hull of a conventional ship and can produce spray at 10 kg a second, drawing electrical power from the ship system. The ship would sail to a selected mid-ocean site and then drift to a sea anchor so as to minimize its own exhaust emissions.
  5.  The MODIS AQUA satellite system crosses most of the world at the same local time each day. We would download photographs of the shortwave radiation signals (channels 1, 3 and 4). These would be translated to align the ship positions and then rotated to bring the mean wind directions to be coincident. Multiple images of the cloud system would be added over a period of a few weeks. The random clouds should average to a medium grey with contrast of the wake improving with the square root of the number of photographs. Photographic superposition will allow the measurement of the result of a very small spray release.
4.  POTENTIAL SIDE EFFECTS
  1.  Our understanding of the world's climate system is far from complete because it is so difficult to carry out controlled experiments over the size range from condensation nuclei to continental weather systems. All geo-engineers are anxious about unintended consequences. Early models show that very large spray injections can have effects in either direction at long distances from the injection site in the same way that el Nino events can influence climate far from Chile and Peru. We also know that release from different sites can have quite different results. We therefore must regard the world climate system as having a large number of possible controls set by when and where we choose to release spray. So far, we have no idea about which control does what. However it should be possible to learn by a series of very small experiments using release patterns modulated on and off at the right periods in a known sequence followed by the measurement of the long-term correlation of climate parameters with the known input. This pseudo random binary sequence technique works well with analysis of communication networks without being noticed by users.
  2.  Modern computers do allow increasingly sophisticated analysis and prediction. Recently there has been a great deal of progress on computer simulation of all the effects of albedo control. The leading team is at the National Centre for Atmospheric Research at Boulder Colorado and is led by Philip Rasch using the most advanced fully-coupled air/ocean model. This produces results for nearly 60 atmospheric parameters presented as maps, zonal graphs and mean values. Evenly spread releases are less damaging than large point injections.
  3.  The amount of salt that cloud albedo control will inject into the atmosphere is orders of magnitude below the amount from breaking waves, some of which falls on land. The difference is that albedo control uses a carefully chosen, narrow spread of drop diameters.
  4.  The immediate effect of cloud albedo control will be a reduction of solar energy reaching the sea. The ocean temperatures are the primary driver of world climate but oceans are a very large thermal store so the effect will be slow. Currents and winds are efficient ways of distributing energy and sharing it with the land so the eventual effects will be well distributed. A short term engineering approach to choosing a cooling strategy would be to look at historic data on sea temperatures and attempt to replicate a pattern thought to be good with regard to sea levels, harvests, hurricane frequency, floods and droughts. Rather than thinking of the side-effects of we should really be studying the side effects of NOT doing albedo control and letting sea temperatures rise. We would then decide which of the outcomes was the least damaging.
  5.  A first effect of warmer seas is greater evaporation. Even though it is left out of many diagrams showing the effects of greenhouse gases, water vapour contributes at least an order of magnitude more global warming than carbon dioxide. 
  6.  The second effect of warmer water flowing north is the loss of summer Arctic ice.
  7.  A third effect is that surface water temperatures above 26.5 C increase the probability and severity of tropical cyclones, hurricanes and typhoons.
  8.  Warmer surface water increases the density difference between it and the nutrient-rich cold water below it. If nutrients cannot flow to where there is light there will be no phytoplankton to act as the start of the marine food chain or as the source of dimethyl sulphide and a sink for carbon dioxide. At present dimethyl sulphide accounts for about 90% of the cloud condensation nuclei, (Charlson 1987) and sea warming will reduce the area producing it.
  9.  The sea has been soaking up much of the anthropogenic CO2. Rising temperature will release it.
  10.  Very large amounts of methane are stored in permafrost and even larger amounts as clathrates in the seabed at depths of a few hundred metres. The release of either could be regarded as an extreme side-effect of warmer seas and has been linked to the Permian extinction.
  11.  So far the only suggested negative effect of increasing cloud condensation nuclei is the possibility of reduced rainfall, something that people in Britain and Bihar would greatly welcome. The production of rain is a very complex process. A gross engineering over-simplification is that rain needs quite large drops to fall through deep clouds collecting smaller drops in their path so that they get big enough not to evaporate in the drier air below the cloud before they reach the ground. It is known that too many small drops due to nucleation from smoke from bush fires can reduce rain.
  12.  Clearly we must be cautious about doing albedo control up-wind of a drought-stricken region. However the driest regions are dry because subsiding air prevents winds blowing in from the sea. Perhaps a larger temperature difference between land and sea could produce a stronger monsoon effect to oppose part of the subsiding flow.
  13.  The effects of the nuclei that we produce will fade quickly. The marine stratocumulus clouds we will be treating are usually not deep enough to produce rain. But we could argue that if they were, the immediate effect would be to stop the rain over the sea and coastal regions. This would leave more water vapour in the air to give rain further inland where its value will be greater.
  14.  If we do not yet know enough about the side-effects of albedo control, at least we know more than about those of uncontrolled temperature rise. But the strongest defence is that we can start with small steps, move away from places where problems occur and stop in a week if some natural event, such as a volcanic eruption, should provide unwanted cooling.
5.  POLITICS
  1.  Control of the UK climate is in the hands of DEFRA. Official funding goes to many laboratories who tend repeat the conclusions from the previous funding that the climate problem is even more serious than previously thought and argue that more funding is necessary to find out how much more serious. There is a reluctance to fund any research into technology which is "not yet soundly proven". The present DEFRA policy is that carbon reductions are the best solution to the climate problem and also that they should be the only solution on the grounds that the possibility of alternatives might reduce pressure to reduce emissions. This is strikingly close to the view of senior officers in the RFC in world war I that issuing parachutes to pilots "might impair their fighting spirit". They were not even allowed to buy their own. The geo-engineering community agrees with the rank order of desirability of emission reduction to geo-engineering but asks "what progress in emissions reduction?" 
  2.  People from the vigorous carbon trading market are emphatic that there could be, even should be, no parallel thermal trading equivalent and so it seems that, at present, there is none of the commercial return needed to attract research funding. Many geo-engineers agree that decisions about deployment should not be based on commercial considerations.
References
Bennartz R 2007. Global assessment of marine boundary layer cloud droplet number concentration from satellite. Journal of Geophysical Research, 112, 12, D02201, doi:10.1029/2006JD007547, Fromhttp://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2007/2006JD007547.shtml 
Bower K, Choularton T, Latham J, Sahraei J and Salter S 2006. Computational assessment of a proposed technique for global warming mitigation via albedo-enhancement of marine stratocumulus clouds. Atmospheric Research 82 pp 328-336.
Charlson RJ, Lovelock JE, Andreae MO and Warren, SG April 1987. Oceanic phytoplankton, atmospheric sulphur and climate.Nature 326 pp 655-661.
Latham J 1990. Control of global warming. Nature 347 pp 339-340.
Latham J 2002. Amelioration of global warming by controlled enhancement of the albedo and longevity of low-level maritime clouds. Atmos Sci Letters. 2002 doi:10.1006/Asle.2002.0048. 
Latham J, Rasch P, Chen C-C, Kettles L, Gadian A, Gettleman A, Morrison H, and Bower K, 2008 Global temperature stabilization via controlled albedo enhancement of low-level maritime clouds. Phil. Trans Roy Soc A Special issue October 2008.
Salter SH, Latham J, Sortino G, Seagoing hardware for the cloud albedo control of reversing global warming. Phil Trans Roy Soc A Special issue October 2008.
Schwartz SE and Slingo A 1996. Enhanced shortwave radiative forcing due to anthropogenic aerosols In Clouds Chemistry and Climate (Crutzen and Ramanathan eds.) pp 191-236 Springer Heidelberg.
Websites
Collected papers http://www.see.ed.ac.uk/~shs 
INDOOR DEMONSTRATION OF THE TWOMEY EFFECT 
  The jar on the left is contains 4 mm clear glass balls and has an albedo of about 0.6. The one on the right has glass balls one hundredth of the size and an albedo over 0.9. 
September 2008