Saturday 24 June 2017

Agents of Chaos



Oh, our government and the press generally won't tell us these things. 

But God told me to tell you this morning. 


The Truth must be told.

God has a way of standing before the nations with judgment, and it seems that I can hear God saying to America, 

"You're too arrogant

And if you don't change your ways, I will rise up and break the backbone of your power! 

And I'll place it in the hands of a nation that doesn't even know my name. 

Be still and know that 

I am God.

We, Worshipping God, have destroyed the Whole Earth, from The East to The West, in The Power of God.


And if this were not The Power of God, what could Men have done..?

I'm an Agent of Chaos.

I'm a Dog Chasing Cars.

I am The Warfare of Genghis Khan.



"We give You this for Our Answer : 

Because You did not obey The Word of God and Obey the Command of Genghis Khan, but took counsel to slay Our envoys - Therefore, God ordered Us to destroy Them, and gave Them up into Our hands.

For otherwise, if God had not done this, what could Man do to Man...?

But You Men of The West believe that you alone are Christians, and despise Others - but how can you know who God deigns to confer His Grace....?

But We, Worshipping God, have destroyed the WHOLE EARTH, from The East to The West, in The Power of God.

And if this were not The Power of God, what could Men have done..?

Therefore, if You accept Peace, and are willing to render your fortresses to Us, You, Pope, and Christian Princes in no way delay coming to Me, to conclude Peace, and then We shall know that you wish to have Peace with Us, but if You should not believe Our letters, and the Command of God, nor harken to Our counsel, then We shall know for certain that You wish to have War, and after that, We do no know what will happen.

God Alone Knows.

You must say with a sincere heart: 

"We Will be your subjects; We Will give You Our strength". 



You must in person come with your Kings, all together, without exception, to render Us service and pay Us homage. Only then Will We acknowledge Your SUBMISSION. And if You Do Not follow the Order of God, and go against Our orders, We Will know You as Our Enemy."

— Letter from Güyük to Pope Innocent IV, 1246



As I have walked among the desperate, rejected, and angry young men, I have told them that Molotov cocktails and rifles would not solve their problems. I have tried to offer them my deepest compassion while maintaining my conviction that social change comes most meaningfully through non-violent action; for they ask and write me, "So what about Vietnam?" 

They ask if our nation wasn't using massive doses of violence to solve its problems to bring about the changes it wanted. 

Their questions hit home, and I knew that I could never again raise my voice against the violence of the oppressed in the ghettos without first having spoken clearly to the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today: 


My Own Government. 



For the sake of those boys, for the sake of this government, for the sake of the hundreds of thousands trembling under our violence I cannot be silent. Been a lot of applauding over the last few years. They applauded our total movement; they've applauded me. America and most of its newspapers applauded me in Montgomery. And I stood before thousands of Negroes getting ready to riot when my home was bombed and said, we can't do it this way. They applauded us in the sit-in movement--we non-violently decided to sit in at lunch counters. The applauded us on the Freedom Rides when we accepted blows without retaliation. They praised us in Albany and Birmingham and Selma, Alabama. Oh, the press was so noble in its applause, and so noble in its praise when I was saying, Be non-violent toward Bull Connor;when I was saying, Be non-violent toward [Selma, Alabama segregationist sheriff] Jim Clark. There's something strangely inconsistent about a nation and a press that will praise you when you say, Be non-violent toward Jim Clark, but will curse and damn you when you say, "Be non-violent toward little brown Vietnamese children. There's something wrong with that press!

As if the weight of such a commitment to the life and health of America were not enough, another burden of responsibility was placed upon me in 1964. And I cannot forget that the Nobel Peace Prize was not just something taking place, but it was a commission--a commission to work harder than I had ever worked before for the brotherhood of Man. This is a calling that takes me beyond national allegiances. But even if it were not present, I would yet have to live with the meaning of my commitment to the ministry of Jesus Christ. To me, the relationship of this ministry to the making of peace is so obvious that I sometimes marvel at those who ask me why I am speaking against the war. Could it be that they do not know that the Good News was meant for all men, for communists and capitalists, for their children and ours, for black and white, for revolutionary and conservative. Have they forgotten that my ministry is in obedience to the One who loved His enemies so fully that he died for them? What, then, can I say to the Vietcong, or to Castro, or to Mao, as a faithful minister to Jesus Christ? Can I threaten them with death, or must I not share with them my life? Finally, I must be true to my conviction that I share with all men the calling to be the son of the Living God. Beyond the calling of race or nation or creed is this vocation of sonship and brotherhood. And because I believe that the Father is deeply concerned, especially for His suffering and helpless and outcast children, I come today to speak for them. And as I ponder the madness of Vietnam and search within myself for ways to understand and respond in compassion, my mind goes constantly to the people of that peninsula. I speak not now of the soldiers of each side, not of the military government of Saigon, but simply of the people who have been under the curse of war for almost three continuous decades now. I think of them, too, because it is clear to me that there will be no meaningful solution until some attempt is made to know these people and hear their broken cries.

Now, let me tell you the truth about it. They must see Americans as strange liberators. Do you realize that the Vietnamese people proclaimed their own independence in 1945 after a combined French and Japanese occupation. And incidentally, this was before the Communist revolution in China. They were led by Ho Chi Minh. And this is a little-known fact, and these people declared themselves independent in 1945. They quoted our Declaration of Independence in their document of freedom, and yet our government refused to recognize them. President Truman said they were not ready for independence. So we fell victim as a nation at that time of the same deadly arrogance that has poisoned the international situation for all of these years. France then set out to reconquer its former colony. And they fought eight long, hard, brutal years trying to re-conquer Vietnam. You know who helped France? It was the United States of America. It came to the point that we were meeting more than eighty percent of the war costs. And even when France started despairing of its reckless action, we did not. And in 1954, a conference was called at Geneva, and an agreement was reached, because France had been defeated at Dien Bien Phu. But even after that, and after the Geneva Accord, we did not stop. We must face the sad fact that our government sought, in a real sense, to sabotage the Geneva Accord. Well, after the French were defeated, it looked as if independence and land reform would come through the Geneva agreement. But instead the United States came and started supporting a man named Diem who turned out to be one of the most ruthless dictators in the history of the world. He set out to silence all opposition. People were brutally murdered because they raised their voices against the brutal policies of Diem. And the peasants watched and cringed as Diem ruthlessly rooted out all opposition. The peasants watched as all this was presided over by United States influence and by increasing numbers of United States troops who came to help quell the insurgency that Diem's methods had aroused. When Diem was overthrown, they may have been happy, but the long line of military dictatorships seemed to offer no real change, especially in terms of their need for land and peace. And who are we supporting in Vietnam today? It's a man by the name of general Ky [Air Vice Marshal Nguyen Cao Ky] who fought with the French against his own people, and who said on one occasion that the greatest hero of his life is Hitler. This is who we are supporting in Vietnam today. 


Oh, our government and the press generally won't tell us these things. 

But God told me to tell you this morning. 

The Truth must be told.

The only change came from America as we increased our troop commitments in support of governments which were singularly corrupt, inept, and without popular support and all the while the people read our leaflets and received regular promises of peace and democracy and land reform. Now they languish under our bombs and consider us, not their fellow Vietnamese, the real enemy. They move sadly and apathetically as we herd them off the land of their fathers into concentration camps, where minimal social needs are rarely met. They know they must move or be destroyed by our bombs. So they go, primarily women, and children and the aged. They watch as we poison their water, as we kill a million acres of their crops. They must weep as the bulldozers roar through their areas preparing to destroy the precious trees. They wander into the towns and see thousands of thousands of the children, homeless, without clothes, running in packs on the streets like animals. They see the children degraded by our soldiers as they beg for food. They see the children selling their sisters to our soldiers, soliciting for their mothers. We have destroyed their two most cherished institutions: the family and the village. We have destroyed their land and their crops. We have cooperated in the crushing of the nation's only noncommunist revolutionary political force, the United Buddhist Church. This is a role our nation has taken, the role of those who make peaceful revolutions impossible but refusing to give up the privileges and the pleasures that comes from the immense profits of overseas investments. I'm convinced that if we are to get on the right side of the world revolution, we as a nation must undergo a radical revolution of values. We must rapidly begin the shift from a thing-oriented society to a person-oriented society. When machines and computers, profit motives and property rights are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, militarism and economic exploitation are incapable of being conquered.

A true revolution of values will soon cause us to question the fairness and justice of many of our present policies. On the one hand, we are called to play the Good Samaritan on life's roadside, but that will be only an initial act. One day we must come to see that the whole Jericho Road must be changed so that men and women will not be constantly beaten and robbed as they make their journey on life's highway. True compassion is more than flinging a coin to a beggar. A true revolution of values will soon look uneasily on the glaring contrast of poverty and wealth with righteous indignation. It will look across the seas and see individual capitalists of the West investing huge sums of money in Asia, Africa, and South America, only to take the profits out with no concern for the social betterment of the countries, and say, "This is not just." It will look at our alliance with the landed gentry of Latin America and say, "This is not just." The Western arrogance of feeling that it has everything to teach others and nothing to learn from them is not just. A true revolution of values will lay hands on the world order and say of war, "This way of settling differences is not just." This business of burning human beings with napalm, of filling our nation's homes with orphans and widows, of injecting poisonous drugs of hate into the veins of peoples normally humane, of sending men home from dark and bloody battlefields physically handicapped and psychologically deranged, cannot be reconciled with wisdom, justice, and love. A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death.

Oh, my friends, if there is any one thing that we must see today is that these are revolutionary times. All over the globe men are revolting against old systems of exploitation and oppression, and out of the wounds of a frail world, new systems of justice and equality are being born. The shirtless and barefoot people of the land are rising up as never before. The people who sat in darkness have seen a great light. They are saying, unconsciously, as we say in one of our freedom songs, "Ain't gonna let nobody turn me around!" It is a sad fact that because of comfort, complacency, a morbid fear of communism, our proneness to adjust to injustice, the Western nations that initiated so much of the revolutionary spirit of the modern world have now become the arch anti-revolutionaries. This has driven many to feel that only Marxism has a revolutionary spirit. Therefore, communism is a judgment against our failure to make democracy real and follow through on the revolutions that we initiated. Our only hope today lies in our ability to recapture the revolutionary spirit and go out into a sometimes hostile world declaring eternal hostility to poverty, racism, and militarism. With this powerful commitment we shall boldly challenge the status quo, we shall boldly challenge unjust mores, and thereby speed up the day when "every valley shall be exalted, and every mountain and hill shall be made low, and the rough places shall be made plain, and the crooked places straight. And the glory of the Lord shall be revealed, and all flesh shall see it together."

A genuine revolution of values means in the final analysis that our loyalties must become ecumenical rather than sectional. Every nation must now develop an overriding loyalty to mankind as a whole in order to preserve the best in their individual societies. This call for a worldwide fellowship that lifts neighborly concern beyond one's tribe, race, class, and nation is in reality a call for an all-embracing, unconditional love for all men. This oft misunderstood and misinterpreted concept, so readily dismissed by the Nietzsches of the world as a weak and cowardly force, has now become an absolute necessity for the survival of mankind. And when I speak of love I'm not speaking of some sentimental and weak response. I am speaking of that force which all of the great religions have seen as the supreme unifying principle of life. Love is somehow the key that unlocks the door which leads to ultimate reality. This Hindu-Muslim-Christian-Jewish-Buddhist belief about ultimate reality is beautifully summed up in the first epistle of John: "Let us love one another, for God is love. And every one that loveth is born of God and knoweth God. He that loveth not knoweth not God, for God is love. If we love one another, God dwelleth in us and his love is perfected in us."

Let me say finally that I oppose the war in Vietnam because I love America. I speak out against this war, not in anger, but with anxiety and sorrow in my heart, and, above all, with a passionate desire to see our beloved country stand as the moral example of the world. I speak out against this war because I am disappointed with America. And there can be no great disappointment where there is not great love. I am disappointed with our failure to deal positively and forthrightly with the triple evils of racism, economic exploitation, and militarism. We are presently moving down a dead-end road that can lead to national disaster. America has strayed to the far country of racism and militarism. The home that all too many Americans left was solidly structured idealistically; its pillars were solidly grounded in the insights of our Judeo-Christian heritage. All men are made in the image of God. All men are bothers. All men are created equal. Every man is an heir to a legacy of dignity and worth. Every man has rights that are neither conferred by, nor derived from the State--they are God-given. Out of one blood, God made all men to dwell upon the face of the earth. What a marvelous foundation for any home! What a glorious and healthy place to inhabit. But America's strayed away, and this unnatural excursion has brought only confusion and bewilderment. It has left hearts aching with guilt and minds distorted with irrationality.

It is time for all people of conscience to call upon America to come back home. Come home, America. Omar Khayyam is right: "The moving finger writes, and having writ moves on." I call on Washington today. I call on every man and woman of good will all over America today. I call on the young men of America who must make a choice today to take a stand on this issue. Tomorrow may be too late. The book may close.


"I call on the young men of America who must make a choice today to take a stand on this issue. Tomorrow may be too late. The book may close. And don't let anybody make you think that God chose America as his divine, messianic force to be a sort of policeman of the whole world. God has a way of standing before the nations with judgment, and it seems that I can hear God saying to America, 

"You're too arrogant! 

And if you don't change your ways, I will rise up and break the backbone of your power! 

And I'll place it in the hands of a nation that doesn't even know my name. 

Be still and know that 

I am God.


Martin Luther King Jr.: 
"Why I Am Opposed to the War in Vietnam"

Sermon at the Ebenezer Baptist Church on April 30, 1967

SOLVE ET COAGULA

THE DEVIL IS A LIAR




 Especially important is the warning to avoid conversations with The Demon. 

We may ask what is relevant but anything beyond that is dangerous. 

He is a Liar. 

The Demon is a Liar. 

He will lie to confuse us. 

But he will also mix lies with the truth to attack us. 

The attack is psychological, Damien, and powerful. 

So don't listen to him. 


Remember that - Do Not Listen.

The Crusader and The Knave


CHAOS + DISORDER

SOLVE ET COAGULAR

Through him [Melko] has pain and misery been made in the clash of overwhelming musics; and with confusion of sound have cruelty, and ravening, and darknes, loathly mire and all putrescence of thought and thing, foul mists and violent flame, cold without mercy, been born, and death without hope. Yet is this through him an not by him; and he shall see, and ye all likewise, and even shall those beings, who must now dwell among his evil and endure through Melko misery and sorrow, terror and wickedness, declare in the end that it redoundeth only to my great glory, and doth but make the theme more worth the hearing, Life more worth the living, and the World so much the more wonderful and marvellous, that of all the deeds of Iluvatar it shall be alled his mightiest and is loveliest. 

(p.55, emphasis mine)

Batman's entire existence, Bruce Wayne's whole life is predicated upon the absolute and strict (delusional) adhearance to his OWN Code of Law - The Law in Gotham ("The System") does not function, and so he defines his own law, applies it, and uses the application of his Law to bring Outlaws Within The System.

He sees himself as a necessary and essential bridging function between the limits and the shortcomings, and the weakness born of corruption of The Law of The System, and he sees him Self and defines his boundaries and moral code as existing only in the space between Expectation and Results.

He's like Captain Picard - he orientates his personality around a fixed point, marking a boundary beyond which (he tells himself) he may never cross and still be True to his cause and his Mission and not stray into the very realm of corruption that forced the need for his existence in the first place - 
The Line in the Sand, 
THIS Far, and No Further.

Beyond that Line, I stop being me, and this stops being what I was put here on this Earth to do.

And he BELIEVES THAT..!!! 
That's hilarious..!!!

How many times in the average week, in the course of his nightly assaults, does he beat a man half to death without so much as a second thought, and leave them bleeding and broken in a filthy alleyway, propped up against a grimy, piss-reek wall, WITHOUT calling them an ambulance...? Three, four time per week...? At the minimum, I would say.

Now - on an average spread of probable outcomes, all else being equal, how many times in a row, consecutively, would you have to beat a man half to death and leave him lying in a gutter without receiving any first aid or medical attention of any kind before one of them develops complications, or bleeds out internally, or suffers a fatal brain haemorrhage as a direct consequence of the sound beating he just took...?

I would guesstimate two or three at the very most.

And Batman, is the one that they say is the SANE one...?!










SARAH
What are you waiting for? 

Tom
Just touch these two strands together 
and The Daleks are finished

Have I that right

SARAH
To destroy the Daleks?
 You can't doubt it. 

Tom
Well, I do

You see, some things 
could be better with The Daleks. 

Many future worlds will 
become allies just because of 
their fear of the Daleks. 

SARAH
But it isn't like that...!

Tom
But The Final Responsibility is mine - and mine alone

Listen, if someone who knew The Future 
pointed out a child to you 
and told you that that child would grow up totally evil
to be a ruthless dictator 
who would destroy millions of lives - 
could you then kill that child..? 


SARAH
...we're talking about The Daleks
the most evil creatures ever invented. 

You must Destroy Them. 

You must complete Your Mission 
for The Time Lords. 


Tom
Do I Have The Right

Simply touch one wire 
against the other and that's it

The Daleks cease to exist. 

Hundreds of millions of people, 
thousands of generations 
can live without fear, in peace, 
and never even know the word 
'Dalek'. 


SARAH: 
Then why wait? 
If it was a disease or some sort of bacteria 
you were destroying, you wouldn't hesitate

DOCTOR: 
But if I kill, wipe out a whole intelligent lifeform - 
then I become Like Them. 

I'd be no better than the Daleks. 

SARAH: 
Think of all the suffering there'll be 
if you don't do it. 

GHARMAN: 
Doctor! Doctor, I've been looking everywhere for you. 
Davros has agreed to our terms. 

HARRY: 
He submitted? 

GHARMAN: 
He did, but he asked only one thing —
That he might be allowed to address 
a meeting of all The Elite, 
Scientific and Military. 

DOCTOR: 
He's going to put a case?

GHARMAN: 
Yes, but a vote will be taken. 
It's a foregone conclusion. 
There'll be a complete landslide 
against any further development of the Daleks. 

We've won


DOCTOR: 
I'm grateful to you, Gharman. 

More grateful than I can tell you...

******

SARAH: 
You don't seem too disappointed - 
We've failed, haven't we? 


DOCTOR :
Failed? No, not really —
You see, I know that although the Daleks will create havoc and destruction for millions of years, 
I know also that out of their Evil 
must come Something Good.

Friday 23 June 2017

The End of White America


"White America will  fall, because it Failed to Rule in a Fair & Equitable Manner,"





There actually, is a Law involved with alla' this, which is higher than Man Law.



All of Them are Anti-God Forces.

"If there's anyway that you can understand what I do for Our Community, in whatever form, I can have a chance to clarify -









Iam Responsible for finding, what we call

The Core of Negativity





 For the people that are in this Core of Negativity,

We have accepted responsibility to put pressure on Them. 


...that maybe They perceive themselves to be Goliath, but We are always reminding Them that David is within their reach -

We don't ever want Them to think that what They regard as so absolute, so evil, so grand, so royal, that can never be defeated contradicts The Law of what goes on.



And in every form, if We were to accept the principle of

You Reap What You Sow "

and if "Reap What You Sow" is True;
And one compiles years of ugly sowing...

Then, somewhere, The Seed gonna come due -

Now, 
Through Whom? " and " When? " will it manifest..?

And if you believe that it will never happen, then What You Believe has a crack in it.

Do you have faith, that when people fail in their opportunity to rule fairly and equitably that They will be robbed of that opportunity, when others who seek to be  - 

(It's a dangerous word) 


Responsible 

arise to accept this responsibility, to replace Those Who Lost Their Right to Rule..?

The Muslims say 
An Eye for an Eye "

And the principle is sound.

Even an atheist say,
What Go Around, Come Around "

Every Spoke on The Wheel has it's Day at The Top






There's a Law invoked with alla' this, that actually is higher than Man Law.





Now, Men will try to take The Weak - and make them think that's all that matters.





We consider Ourselves ABOVE Law - because :





Under White [Corporate Marine/Anglo-Saxon/Gothic/Napoleonic] Law, 





you can rob a Man LEGALLY.





So We don't use "law" as a measure of someone's value, where "law" will give some people an advantage over others.





So, c'mon now




We Do Not Say That MAN's Law is THE Law -

but Men will try to make you think it so...






You were warned that Something Would Rise -





but nobody wanted to explain




IN WHAT FORM.




And then, if it be The Response, nobody would ever make you think that it was The Little People's job, and not those that we call :

HAVE-A-LITTLE-WANT-SOME-MORE

Because 




The Have-a-Little-Want-Some-More 



have NO TERMS.




They'll use a term they used to call in Politics : "Cut Us In, or Cut It Out"





Part of what enhances Our ability to be EFFECTIVE with The Victims is that We are





UNDERESTIMATED





And We Accept That.




WE ACCEPT THAT.




as,




Why It Is That We Will Win.

Wednesday 21 June 2017

The Vic-Sims of Grendel : Isn't It Possible...?







T'LARA: 
Captain Sisko? 



SISKO: 
Admiral, I apologise for interrupting your deliberations, but I have some new evidence I'd like to present. 



T'LARA: 
Very well. 



SISKO: 
I'd like Advocate Ch'Pok to evaluate the evidence as an expert witness on the Klingon Empire. 



T'LARA: 
I will not compel you to testify, Advocate. 



SISKO: 
Care to step onto my battlefield? 



(Ch'Pok takes the stand.



SISKO: 
Advocate, how would you describe the current relationship between the Federation and the Klingon Empire? 



CH'POK: 
There is no formal relationship between our two governments. 



SISKO:
What would you call us? Informal friends? Informal enemies? 



CH'POK: 
I would say there is potential for either label, but at the moment neither is entirely accurate. 



SISKO: 
Hmm. Interesting. 
Would you agree that at the moment, it is difficult for us to trust each other? 



CH'POK: 
Difficult, but not impossible. There are things that transcend our differences. For example, we trust that this case can be decided fairly. We have faith in Admiral T'Lara's judgement. 



SISKO: 
I'm glad to hear you have such a profound respect for the Admiral. But would it be fair to say that outside this hearing you do not entirely trust us? 



CH'POK: 
Well, it is only prudent that we question your motives now that we are no longer allies. 



SISKO: 
Of course. And it is only prudent of us to question your motives. After all, aren't there times when you feel it's in your best interest to deceive us? 



CH'POK: 
I object to the question. It is vague and hypothetical. 



SISKO: 
Well, can you imagine any circumstance in which the Empire would deceive the Federation? 



CH'POK: 
I have a poor imagination. 



SISKO: 
Let's see what we can do to spark it. 




(Sisko gives Ch'Pok a PADD) 


SISKO: 
Do you recognise these names? 

CH'POK: 
These are the people who were killed on board the transport. 

SISKO: 
You're positive? There are four hundred and forty one of them. 



CH'POK: 
The names and faces of these people are seared into my heart. This is a list of heroes who died at the hands of a coward. It is a list I can never forget. 


SISKO: 
They are an interesting group of people aren't they? 
From every walk of life. 
Merchants, soldiers, artists, shopkeepers. 

CH'POK: 
Children. 

SISKO: 
Children. 
We've done some checking in their backgrounds, and in our opinion they all appear to be a random group of people who shared only one thing in common. 

They travelled on the same ship. 

Is that your conclusion as well? 

CH'POK: 
Yes. 




SISKO:
 And it was just fate that led these particular people to board a doomed ship? 



CH'POK: 
Fate is a human concept. 
They simply boarded the wrong ship at the wrong time. 


SISKO: 
And then they did it again. 



CH'POK: 
I don't think I understand your line of 



SISKO: 
Three months ago a Klingon transport ship crashed in the mountains of Galorda Prime. Of course, everyone assumed the worst, that the passengers and crew had all been killed. But then, miraculously, everyone survived. Do you know anyone who was on that ship? 



CH'POK: 
No. 



SISKO: 
Are you sure? You have the names of the survivors right there. I can understand your confusion. The names in front of you are identical to the names on this list. The people who were killed in the Defiant incident. So, what does this mean? Four hundred and forty one people somehow survived a crash on Galorda Prime and then a few weeks later they all decide to take another trip, on the same day, on the same transport ship, under the same captain and crew, and then that ship is destroyed, too. This is a very unlucky group of people, wouldn't you say? 



CH'POK: 
I am not an expert on luck. 



SISKO: 
No. You are an expert on the Klingon Empire. 
So, tell me, Advocate. 

Isn't it possible that there were no civilians on the transport Worf destroyed? 

Isn't it possible that the ship he saw was sending out false sensor images and that this whole affair was staged so that the only Klingon officer in Starfleet would be accused of a massacre and the Federation would be forced to stop escorting the convoys? 

Tell me, Advocate, isn't it possible? 



CH'POK: 
Yes.