Timon of Athens

"...that idea of The Far-Off Man, way, way out there,  but what does The Hermit tell us...?


If you try this get as lonely as you can get, you become visibly aware which you can't get away from it, because when you get very lonely very fast you become extremely thin and everything that goes on is or now ordinarily unnoticed cum spiritum 

First of all, you will find that there is a  Community of Insects.

And they are tremendously interested in You, and not necessarily hostile, in maybe some cases they are so.

But alone in The Forest, when you get really quiet, you'll notice little creatures will come and inspect you look you all over an
they'll go away and tell their friends and they'll come and look to see what it is and you become aware of every single sound and you realize that alone you're in the midst of a vast burning crowd - it may not be human but it's everything else - so
that the the point of being honest the discipline leads you to understand that 
You can't Resign

The lonelier you are, the more you're joined together with everything else. "

" Look at it - from another point of view, supposing I say everybody's playing the game Me First  - now, I'm going to play the game You First, to use the phrase of Bonhoeffer who called Jesus The Man for Others - now, let's see if we could play that game instead of Me First, You First 

Or,

"I'm the one see who's so generous I'm the one who's so loving so self-effacing and all you insolent brats ...."

- Alan Watts

" This controversial play follows the declining fortunes of a man of extravagant contradictions.  

The fabulously rich Timon believes all his friends to be as open-hearted and generous as himself. When his wealth suddenly evaporates, however, he discovers the truth and his altruism turns to a bitter hatred of mankind. Stirred up by the cynical Apemantus, Timon retreats to the woods where he plots the destruction of Athens, the city that had formerly seemed to embody everything pleasurable and civilized. The cosmic scope of his hatred is communicated in a series of powerful and disturbing dramatic tableaux. 

The Curse :

SCENE I. Without the walls of Athens.

Enter TIMON

TIMON

Let me look back upon thee. O thou wall,
That girdlest in those wolves, dive in the earth,
And fence not Athens! Matrons, turn incontinent!
Obedience fail in children! slaves and fools,
Pluck the grave wrinkled senate from the bench,
And minister in their steads! to general filths
Convert o' the instant, green virginity,
Do 't in your parents' eyes! bankrupts, hold fast;
Rather than render back, out with your knives,
And cut your trusters' throats! bound servants, steal!
Large-handed robbers your grave masters are,
And pill by law. Maid, to thy master's bed;
Thy mistress is o' the brothel! Son of sixteen,
pluck the lined crutch from thy old limping sire,
With it beat out his brains! Piety, and fear,
Religion to the gods, peace, justice, truth,
Domestic awe, night-rest, and neighbourhood,
Instruction, manners, mysteries, and trades,
Degrees, observances, customs, and laws,
Decline to your confounding contraries,
And let confusion live! Plagues, incident to men,
Your potent and infectious fevers heap
On Athens, ripe for stroke! Thou cold sciatica,
Cripple our senators, that their limbs may halt
As lamely as their manners. Lust and liberty
Creep in the minds and marrows of our youth,
That 'gainst the stream of virtue they may strive,
And drown themselves in riot! Itches, blains,
Sow all the Athenian bosoms; and their crop
Be general leprosy! Breath infect breath,
at their society, as their friendship, may
merely poison! Nothing I'll bear from thee,
But nakedness, thou detestable town!
Take thou that too, with multiplying bans!
Timon will to the woods; where he shall find
The unkindest beast more kinder than mankind.
The gods confound--hear me, you good gods all--
The Athenians both within and out that wall!
And grant, as Timon grows, his hate may grow
To the whole race of mankind, high and low! Amen.

Exit

The Ride, in fact, is Made Up of Denial

"Today, a Young Man on acid realised that :

• All matter is merely energy condensed to a slow vibration. 

• That we are all OneConsciousness, experiencing itself subjectively. 

• There is no such thing as 'Death', Life is only a Dream and We're The Imagination of Our Selves." 

"Here's Tom with the weather." 

"Wow! Did you see the fuckin news!" By the way that thing I just did about matter is energy condensed to a slow vibration, we are all one conssciousness experiencing itself subjectively, and dadada, that thing I just did? 

Einstein proved that...! 

[Cosmic Manic Joker Laugh]

Not Complete, Even Though Correct.

 It's called Quantum Physics. 

Anyway I was tripping one day with Al, which was really weird, 'cos he's dead.

 And I said 'Al do you notice the walls are fuckin breathing right now?'

"Bill I noticed the same thing, I've got to jot some numbers down real quick, I just had a fuckin idea" 

"I saw your head light up like a fuckin bulb Al, this is unbelievable. 

Its called Quantum Physics, 

its called The 20th Century... 

We'll get there one day. "

You've been fantastic and I hope you enjoyed it.

 There is a point - is there a point to all of this...? 

Let's find a point. 

Is there a point to my act? 

I would say there is. 
I have to.

The World is like a Ride at an amusement park. 

And when you choose to go on it, you think that it's Real because that's how powerful our minds are. 

[Audience member shouts 'bollocks'] 

There is a lot denial in this ride, 

The Ride, in fact, is made up of Denial.

"All things work in Goatboys favour". 

The World is like a ride at an amusement park. It goes up and down and round and round. It has thrills and chills and it's very brightly coloured and it's very loud and it's fun, for a while. 

Some people have been on The Ride for a long time and they begin to question, 

"Is this Real, or is this Just a Ride?" 

And Other People have remembered, and they come back to us, they say, 

"Hey - don't worry, don't be afraid, ever, because, 

This is Just a Ride..." 

And We... 

Kill those people. 

Ha ha !!

"Shut him up!" 

"We have a lot invested in this ride! 

Shut him up! 

Look at my furrows of worry. 

Look at my big bank account and my family. 

This just has to be real." 

Just a ride. 

But we always kill those good guys who try and tell us that, you ever notice that? And let the demons run amok?

Jesus : 

Murdered

Martin Luther King :

Murdered

Malcolm X :

Murdered

Gandhi :

Murdered

John Lennon :

Murdered

Reagan : 

Wounded.

But it doesn't matter because: 

It's Just a Ride. 

And we can change it anytime we want. 

It's only a choice. 

No effort, no work, no job, no savings and money. 

A choice, right now, between Fear and Love.

The Eyes of Fear want you to put bigger locks on your doors, buy guns, close yourself off. 

The Eyes of Love, instead, see All of Us as one. 

Here's what we can do to change The World, right now, to a Better Ride :

Take all that money that we spend on weapons and defences each year and instead spend it feeding and clothing and educating The Poor of The World, which it would many times over, not one human being excluded, and we could explore Space, together, both inner and outer, Forever, in Peace. 

Thank you very much, you've been great. 

[Applause] 

I hope you enjoyed it. 

London, you were fantastic, thank you, thank you very much. 

[bow] [bow] 

[three shots ring out - Bill crumples to the ground] 

So we then move on you see to another possible response, not repentance, but that of resignation :

"I quit The Game, I won't play it." 

There are all sorts of ways of doing this but basically this is an aristocratic posture, 

"You ordinary mortals with all your Desires, and all your Involvements are deluded - You Get attached to Things.

But there are a certain minority of Us, Who are above it all. 

And since We've resigned We're not going to follow This now. " 

This as I say is an artistocratic, [be aware]  that it may be aristocratic in two ways : There's the aristocracy of the Hindu Sannyasi the people outside and above caste and there's also the aristocracy of the actual aristocrat - I get so mixed up with my British and American pronunciation on this - but 

The Aristocrat who comes on with the position of always being bored, who has complete sangfreud who is imperturbable 

Kaiser Ling's study of this mentality is marvelous in his book of Europe the essay on Hungary portrays the rightly he calls the grand signeur. 

He always identified himself as a type disrobe the grand familia cannot be saved,  who could always be always rise to the occasion under any social circumstances whatsoever, without trying to do so or without apparently trying to do so.

In other words if he goes to the Opera wearing blue jeans he will somehow make it apparent that everybody else is improperly dressed.

This is a very interesting type of person you know there was an essay written by someone whose name I can't remember in the Centennial Review which contrasted the Attitude to Time of the

aristocracy, the bourgeoisie and the proletariat; 

It said The Aristocrat lives in The Past because his ancient forbears have achieved everything and his very by the fact of his birth in his existence he has nothing to strive for and he somehow I never need overdo it - he's always cool.

The Bourgeois on the other hand feels that it's necessary to arrive 

and he's always striving for The Future

Whereas the aristocrat lives in  The Past, on the other hand, 
The Proletarian lives in The Present because he doesn't care about his reputation, and he just lives.

And so of the three bourgeois The Sucker 

because the formula is always cheated because, well, it's going to come someday, see, you're going to get it - even your money when you pull it out of your pocket,  there says on it 

"Promise to Pay" 

- watch out for that!

It's poverty and the bourgeoisie use the news on from the whole the whole economy is the United States being the great bourgeois country is in a state of expectancy of feeling happy, not on what you have but on what is going to come 

The Aristocrat is happy on what has happened, these great achievements of the past mean there's nothing left to do except sort of glory in it.

The Proletarian wants it right now, see and they often get it; 

About the poor bourgeois, my uncle once said 

The Poor have it given them 

The Rich have it anyway so 

The Middle Classes do without

So both the aristocrats and the sannyasi have resigned.

Now, the more interesting of the two types is Acosta Sonia who resigns from The World Game, let me review for you the role of the sannyasin in Indian culture you know there are four castes because the priests or Brahmins the caste of warriors and rulers called Kshatriya the caste of merchants called Vasia and the caste of workers called Shudra 

And to belong to a caste means that you are in  the state called grihastha, which is householder that is to say you are One Who is Involved in The World, you are engaged in what is called loca Sandra and loca means The Well, Sandra, upholding, upholding the going on of The Great Illusion and so you are playing for money for position for status, for success and hoping above all that you could win - You can beat The Game.

But it's supposed in the same culture that every man who attains the age of 45 or so, who has now a grown son to take over his work, will quit the game, will resign and so, when you come to be at age you're supposed to move from the state of grihastha, householder to vanaprastha which means forest dweller.

You give away all your possessions to your son, you change your name, you take off your clothes and go more or less naked, because you have abandoned status.

So in spite of the fact that he has no status, he is however respected in the culture for being an upper outcast, whereas the Aborigines of the Indian Peninsula are Untouchables, the lower outcast and the upper outcast always mimics the lower.

For example Buddha had his disciple wear ochre robes because ochre robes were worn by convicts. 

So in the same way if today, in San Quentin, they all wear blue jeans with special kind pants and a kind of a blue denim jacket and this could well become the uniform of a new kind of sannyasi in the

Western world and to some extent this is happening.

So this guy says 

"The Game is not worth the cap, 
the richer I get, the more miserable I get"

You know how this is, you think that your problems may be monitored and you get more money.

What do you do then we've got enough money, you start worrying about your health and you can never never stop worrying about that 

Or if you're not worried about your health you worry about politics, if somebody's going to take your money away from you, worried about taxes, about Who's Cheating You.

And so a person who goes through all that he's finally 

"I don't think The Game's worth it, I'm going to resign."

And so resignation or renunciation the difference from repentance it hasn't it hasn't got the same kind of passion in the resolve that the repentant person feels he's wrong who made a mistake has committed sin and wants to get better about the renounce first didn't concerns of that country he knows that better progress whether moral or material is an illusion and you have to understand this when you approach for example the study of Buddhism I think one of the most withering remarks I ever heard, from an oriental, he was Japanese he said once he was 

"Never forget that whereas Jesus was the Son of a Carpenter, Buddha was the son of a King" 

You know Wow! Take that! 

And it's choose it is something always about about that this is not the this is easy to see which Christianity historically was the protest of the slave class again if the Roman, establishment Buddhism was different it was the abandonment of position by an aristocracy  - That We've done it We've seen it all we've had it so now we check out and we will be therefore we will resign from all games and if you follow this attitude to an extreme you're going to make because it all goes to the center the same discovery that is made by the person who follows repentance to an extreme.

Just as The Repentant Person discovers that his contrition is phoney the person who tries to resign will discover that he can't, that 

There is no way of not playing games 

Let's go a little bit then into this Game Theory there are a lot of games that we play and not only the game of 
Can I get One Up on The Universe,  of Pretending That I'm me This Ego, With Its

Name and Its Role, The Man, 

but also we have what I call meta-games, for example the game 

My Games Better Than Your Game,

or the game 

"I Won't Play With You Because Your Game is Vulgar, Stupid, Banal, Inferior or Whatever." 

One of the most, therefore, effective games in saying My Game is Better Than Your Game is that 

I'm Not Playing Games At All.

You are now at the lowest level we find that in the form of :

You're Not Sincere, I am sincere 

You are Fooling, I'm not Fooling You and Being Honest with You 

Now, that's a great game and of resignation is a form of it as to say you are children claim with toys and you haven't ever really woken up to the important concerns of life you haven't reached the dimension of ultimate sincerity all, that is to say Ultimate Reality, and in order to reach it you have to 

Resign from Distractions 

You hear a great deal in the literature about meditation of getting rid of distractions wandering for well I you might ask when you think about all that what are wandering for what are wrong for what shouldn't I be doing with my mind, well they all say actually every day you think about this and then you think about that in your thoughts run on in an undisciplined way from one association to another and you can't keep your mind fully on the job or whatever so you see, you're supposed to announce that because that's True Reality all those wandering thoughts they're not about the

importance now what's important what should you keep your mind on well, something just as long as you keep your mind on.

In an instruction one of the Buddhist scriptures says about concentration, when they concentrate on a yellow square on the ground, on the burning tip of an incense stick, on your navel, on the tip of your nose on the, center between the eyes, or anything.

And then the footnote the commentator adds 

"But not on any wicked thing." 

As you know that commentators the world over, they never have any [sense of humour].

So anything will do just so long as you keep your mind on it, and don't wander, stick to it, so wandering is involvement in games,

by this kind of definition, so then you try to get out can you now get out can you stop competing with other human beings 

In ancient Greek society there was a place in the center of the community called the argon AG om and this was a place for contests where they had wrestling matches and other athletic events because all the men were constantly trying to show who was the

better and from this were the agonyax which means these the contest itself held in the argon we get our word agony, the struggle and striving to be superior and a lot of people that you meet among you,  you will recognize this among your friends all the time are not happy unless they are involved in the contest it doesn't matter what it is, so long as they're trying to beat something they're  happy 

And you may say over everything :

"You know can't we just sit around and talk instead of having to play a game, or bet or do something to prove who's the stronger...?" 

I was married to a girl who never was happy unless she was engaged in some kind of combat, when of course I had a game, it didn't look like one,  and so it was a very superior game just because it didn't look like one,  but it was a form of the game, my games that renews so you can't really not-play, you may go through the motions of not playing, but you still are. 

The Psychonauts Field Manual by BlueFluke

Renunciation

No two Sannyasins are the same. 

The Meaning of Sanyasa or Renunciation in Hinduism

by Jayaram V

In Hinduism renunciation or sanyasa is the true mark of spiritual life. It is believed to be the simple and straightforward way to achieve moksha or liberation. Truly speaking, in the context of sanyasa or renunciation, the word, "achieve," is not the right word to use because “achieve” denotes materialism, seeking and striving for something, whereas in renunciation one has to give up worldly life and material possessions, and live without aiming for anything in particular, including the goal of salvation, liberation or union with God. Having a purpose is important in worldly life, whereas not having any purpose is the central feature of renunciation or sanyasa in Hinduism.

People who follow the path of sanyasa or renunciation are expected to lead very austere and ascetic lives, setting aside all desires and comforts and acknowledging no relationship whatsoever, including the relationship with God and oneself. One has to forgo all acts of self-preservation and self-advancement and the need to further one's ego and identity.

Some sects of Hinduism encourage their initiates to develop equanimity and selflessness through extreme measures such as engaging in unusual acts of self-abasement to attract public ridicule and criticism or willfully subjecting themselves to self-torture pain and suffering to cultivate equanimity and indifference. It is to keep the ego under check and avoid self-importance. They also practice extreme fasting, self-mortification, staying too close to fire, sleeping upon a bed of thorns, living amidst dangerous animals, and practicing painful asanas such as standing on one leg or keeping one hand immobile. Some also spend their nights in graveyards, desolate places, or abandoned houses to overcome fear of death or hungry ghosts. The ultimate purpose of these methods is to overcome attraction and aversion and stabilize the mind in the contemplation of the Self or God. They are considered extreme and avoided by many.

Sanyasa in Vedic tradition

Sanyasa is also recognized in Hinduism as one of the four ashramas or stages in the life of a human being, the other three being brahmacharya (the life of a celibate), grihastha (the life of a householder) and vanaprastha (the life of retirement or a forest recluse). Sanyasa or the life of renunciation comes in the end. 

Gautama Sutras identifies the third stage as that of ascetic (bhikshu) and the fourth as of the hermit in the woods (vaikhânasa). The householder is the source of the other three because they do not produce offspring. Hence, it is far more important in the practise of Dharma.

After an individual spends his life in acquiring knowledge as a student and becoming a householder to perform his obligatory duties towards himself, his parents, his family and society, he reaches a stage where he thinks he has done his part and fulfilled all his obligations. Then, he may withdraw from active life and spend the rest of his life in search of liberation. According to the Vedas, he has to accomplish it in two stages: first as a Vanaprastha (forest dweller) and later as a Sanyasi (recluse or hermit).

In Vanaprastha he withdraws from active duties and responsibilities by transferring them to his sons. Then, leaving behind his family and household life, he goes to a forest or a hermitage where he leads a contemplative life and prepares himself for the hardships of the next stage, Sanyasa or the life of renunciation and self-negation. During this phase, he is allowed to beg for food and subsist on it, wandering from place to place, except during the rainy season.

Thus, Vanaprastha is the intermediary stage between life as a householder or a lay follower and life as a renunciant or an advanced follower of Dharma. In the phase of Sanyasa, as the name implies the renunciant is expected to forgo all ownership and doership and live as a hermit or a recluse, with the sky as his roof and the earth as his home. He cannot own a home, cook food for himself, or maintain any relationship with anyone. He has to live as life happens, being contended with what comes and goes, renouncing all desires. relationships, attachments and possessions.

Sanyasa is a life of complete hardship, a self-imposed exile from the comforts of life, a total self-abnegation and willful surrender to fate, without complaint, motive or expectation. The renunciant has to embrace uncertainty as way of life to cultivate trust and faith in God with the belief that whatever is willed for him, or whatever happens to him, is for his good only and is part of his instruction. Such an attitude is possible only when one abstains from choosing and accepts both pleasure and pain as gifts from God.

The law books prescribe several rules for the ascetics and renunciants. For example, the ascetics (vanaprasthas) were not allowed to enter villages except for begging. They were to beg late, after people completed their meals, and wear only a rag to cover their bodies. They were also not allowed to change their residence during the rainy season. A hermit (sanyasi) was not allowed to even beg. He had to subsist on roots and tubers or wild growing vegetables. According to the Gautama Sutras he was allowed to eat the flesh of animals, which were killed by carnivorous beasts. 

However, he was not allowed to visit any village or step on a ploughed field, nor eat anything that was stored for more than a  year. The Baudhayana Sutra recognizes two types of hermits (renunciants) who lived in the past, those who cooked food and those who did not. Both were further subdivided into five subgroups according to the types of food they were allowed to eat.

Hindus of today rarely follow the fourfold Varnashrama Dharma. People may retire from their jobs, but they do not retire from their active householder duties. Some may join teacher traditions (guru institutions) and live in Ashrams as lifelong members or temporary residents, doing voluntary work for their gurus or helping the ashrams in upkeep. Some go on long pilgrimages or visit temples. Some go to the Himalayas or mountainous regions and practice meditation in obscure places or caves under the guidance of a master. However, most people remain attached to their homes, families, children and relations until the end. Perhaps, many may not even know what Varnashrama Dharma truly means. For them retirement means withdrawal from active social and professional life, but not from family life. In today's world government regulations in many countries do not permit people to live in the forests, under the trees or subsist on forest produce.

It was not the case in ancient times. Brahmanas and Kshatriyas practised the fourfold Varnashrama Dharma in the Vedic times. The Upanishads mention the names of people like King Janaka and Yajnavalkya who renounced worldly life and retired to forests for liberation. In the past, when a person entered Sanyasa, he had to undertake an oath by performing one last fire sacrifice to give up all attachments and social identities such as his name or family name and not to maintain any active relationship with his family or friends.

It was meant to make a break with his past and begin anew his life as a self-reliant, free soul, on his way to ultimate freedom from the mortal life and rebirth. He was expected to withdraw the sacrificial fire into himself by ritually extinguishing with it so that he would himself become an embodiment of fire and the source of the radiant, spiritual energy (tapas), which would burn the impurities of the mind and body and the latent impressions (Samskaras) of his past lives. He was also forbidden from the use of fire for cooking, heating or ritual purposes. Instead, he had to secure his daily food either by begging or by eating only what the trees shed on their own. He was also expected to reduce his daily intake of food progressively so that his body would lighten up and eventually fall off.

The fourfold Varnashrama Dharma, however, is not compulsory for everyone. It is also not necessary that everyone has to enter Sanyasa in the last phase of their lives after completing the prior three stages. It is the ideal for those who choose to become householders and practise their duties for the order and regularity of the world and the continuation of their families.

A person can take up sanyasa at any age or time in his life. There are no restrictions as such if someone wants to become a renunciant at an early age. In such matters one has to be guided strictly according to one’s inner aspirations. The Buddha and Mahavira became renunciants when they were young. So did Nachiketa. The decision to become a renunciant may arise in a person after an intense spiritual experience, as in case of Ramana Maharshi, or it may happen according to the wishes of an enlightened spiritual master, as in case of Lahari Mahasaya and Yogananda.

Sanyasa as an internal practice

Sanyasa has an outer aspect and an internal aspect. The outer aspect consists of the rules and regulations or the code of conduct which the renunciants have to follow as part of their spiritual discipline (sadhana). The internal aspect consists of the attitude and mental discipline one has to practise to stabilize the mind and suppress its modifications.

The emergence of spiritual practices was a marked development in the history of Vedic religion. Just as the ritual became internalized in the later Vedic period, the practice of sanyasa also underwent profound changes in course of time. The emphasis gradually shifted from the external observances, although they were still important, to internal practices, such as concentration, meditation, mindfulness practices, devotional worship, and self-absorption. They were to be practiced along with detachment, dispassion, renunciation of desires, truthfulness, nonviolence, non-stealing, non-possession, humility, surrender, etc.

Thus in Sanyasa the attitude of renunciation and detachment became far more important than the mere observance of external practices such as wearing marks on the body, putting on orange robes, growing a beard, begging for food or giving discourses. Such observances are still important in many teacher traditions, but the emphasis is more on inner purity, righteous conduct, detachment, inward focus, adherence to the given instructions and allegiance to the teacher and the path or the teacher tradition.

The Bhagavadgita goes a step further and declares that true renunciation (sanyasa) is giving up desires and desire for the fruit of actions rather than giving up actions themselves. In other words, a Sanyasa does not have to live in the forests or in a monastery to achieve liberation. He can live in the world and yet practise sanyasa by living selflessly. He can perform his duties without desires and offer them to God as a sacrifice. By that Karmayoga, he is equally qualified, if not more, for liberation and the life of renunciation.

Sanyasa means

Thus, presently in Hinduism sanyasa means giving up all desires, and thereby freeing the mind from all attachments and expectations. A Sanyasi becomes mentally free from everything that holds him in control, before becoming free from the mortal life itself. Physical and mental freedom precedes spiritual freedom through the act of renunciation. We may define a Sanyasi as the one who lives without intentions and expectations and who makes no deliberate effort to be or to have anything. He puts himself under the control of God, fate or the world rather than under his own control. He becomes like the wind or the water, flowing in whatever direction life pushes him.

Etymologically, Sanyasa (sa+anya+asa) means having no desire or aspiration (asa) other (anya) than liberation or union with God (sa). It also means living with (sa) no (na) intentional striving or effort (ayasa). Sanyasa is effortless and aimless living, or living without purpose, with God as the inner Lord, controller and guide. It is the negation of life to break the habits of the mind and body and set oneself free from the delusion and ignorance caused by the field of Maya.

The word sanyasa may also have been derived from the word, Nyasa, which has several meanings. One of them is, giving up, abandoning, relinquishing, resigning, etc. Another refers to the practice of assigning various parts of the body to different deities or to different parts of the same deity. It is usually done in ritual worship along with prayers and chants. In Sanyasa that offering (nyasa) is made to God along with the Self (sa or saha). Thus, sanyasa means giving up or offering of one's body and soul to God or to the Self.

According to the renunciant traditions of India, a renunciant or an ascetic person who has given up worldly life has to live unconditionally, without desires, without effort, without striving, without preference and without expectations. He has to live and work in a state of total freedom, without any particular identity, status or self-importance, unencumbered by the burdens of the past or the anxieties of the future. Whether he is alone or in the company of others, he should remain free from all attachments, compulsions and entanglements, like a lotus leaf, without taking sides, making judgments or being influenced by any particular faith or belief.

According to the definition, a sanyasi has to remain unattached to himself and to everything here and hereafter, be it an idea, thought, opinion, belief, doctrine, religion, a god or a goddess. He cannot depend upon anyone or anything, has to give up all the urge to control or regulate his life or that of others, and live as if he does not exist and does not matter. In other words, he has to become empty like space and insignificant like a fallen, autumn leaf on the edge of life as if he is already dead and his presence or absence would not cause any observable or noticeable difference to the world.

The attitude and practice of Sanyasa

When a person reaches the culmination in the practice of renunciation, he develops a stable mind and sharp intelligence (sthitha prajna), which give him the supernatural ability to read other people’s minds or anticipate events, even though they do not interest him or trouble him. The presence or absence of anything would not cause in him mental ripples. As he aimlessly wanders in the world, he may come across numerous attractions and distractions, but he will not desire anything, nor avoid anything. Outwardly he may appear to be engaged with the world and people, but inwardly he remains detached, disinterested and selfless, judging none and favoring none in particular. He leads an active life, but remain untouched and untainted by it.

The purpose of sanyasa is to withdraw from the world and look inward so that he may catch a glimpse of the eternal state. For that he has to give up his individuality and identity. A sanyasi may go by a name, but he will not let that name strengthen his ego or bind him to the world. He knows that the name and form are temporary while his Self is eternal, transcendental, pure and indestructible. 

Hence, he does not engage in self-promotion. He may acknowledge his individuality, but he will not feel compelled to protect it promote it or preserve it. He may take care of his mind and body, but does it in deference to God or the Self that resides in him.

He lives in the present, with his mind immersed in the thoughts of God. If at all he looks into future, it is not to plan for his future or to know about it but to see what may be in store for the world or for others so that if necessary he may help them or caution them. As the Bhagavadgita says, the renunciant who has given up worldly life performs his actions without ownership or doership. While engaged in actions, he thinks that he is doing nothing all. Thus, from the perspective of karma it is as if he is not engaged in any action even though he performs actions. Whether it is walking, talking, seeing, hearing, touching, smelling, tasting or breathing, he remains an observer, knowing that his senses are dealing with the sense objects and his body is engaged in actions.

True renunciation is therefore an attitude of indifference, equanimity or sameness. It is a way of life, in which the renunciant sets aside his desires and expectations to let go off all intentional effort and compulsive planning. He lets things happen, identifying himself with his essential nature and true Self. Through austerities, restraints and observances he practises self-transformation to become aware of his inseparable connection with God and his all-pervading nature, whereby he loses all forms of fear and lives freely, according to the divine will, without striving and expectations, willfully surrendering to God and letting him take responsibility and ownership of his actions and his life. Through renunciation, he truly becomes free from the desire to direct his life or the habitual compulsion to exercise his will for his survival or success. Thereby, eventually he experiences the state of being rather than doing. He becomes liberated in human body (jivanmukta) and a true embodiment of divine soul in human form (mahatma).

The Qualities of a Sannyasin

No two sannyasins are the same. 

They each express themselves and attain realisation in a way which depends on their own personality and samskaras. As each sannyasin progresses, his quest becomes clearer and clearer before his mind. He begins to embody higher values and attitudes which reflect a spontaneously growing spiritual awareness and an expanding conception of himself, his aim, and his mission in life.

Aiming high

The sannyasin seeks perfection by doing his best in whatever he is engaged. This is the essence of sannyas life. The sannyasin who is satisfied with second best or who doesn't really try, cannot progress. He has to try to the best of his ability in every activity and under all circumstances, whether adverse or otherwise. He has to seek and aim for perfection, not in others, but in himself.

Perfecting sannyas involves two things: feeling and willpower. It is the whispering voice of inner feeling that tells if one is doing the right thing or the wrong thing, saying the right thing or the wrong thing. It tells the sannyasin when to act and when not to act, when to speak and when not to speak. When the path of right action is known, then all of his energy is thrown into doing and accomplishing what has to be done. This is willpower, which increases according to the degree that he feels, or knows that the actions are correct. Inappropriate actions sap the energy whereas appropriate actions replenish and increase willpower and energy. It is the aim of all sannyasins to become impeccable.

The mission of a sannyasin

The sannyasin is dedicated to self-realization. He seeks to make himself 'real'; to fully accept responsibility and control of his health, his mind and his destiny. For a sannyasin, it is not enough to believe in second-hand dogmas, nor to half-heartedly practice religions or rituals. He seeks direct perception of the truth in his life, without support from any external agency. He seeks to embody the highest state of consciousness, and he will not be satisfied with anything less. He chooses to live in an ashram environment where his mind will be laid bare of all its preconceptions and false beliefs; where he will confront all his inadequacies and problems directly.

He seeks the assistance and guidance of his guru, who has trod the path before him, and has direct perception of the highest reality. For a sannyasin, only the guidance of an enlightened man of knowledge is acceptable. The sannyasins mission is to serve his guru, and the guru's mission is to serve all mankind. He lives a higher life on the earthly plane, not for himself, but for the only self that really exists, the universal self which underlies all of creation and is reflected in every individual. In the guru's service, the sannyasin learns to work with absolute dedication, but without emotional involvement, accepting the limitations of others, while leading an exemplary life amongst them.

The sadhana of a sannyasin

For the sannyasin, the whole of life becomes sadhana. Every event and every incident is an object of awareness, and no special times, places or activities are considered any more beneficial spiritually than any others. For the sannyasin, if God dwells in the temple, then he surely dwells just as much anywhere else. Although he is fully familiar with yoga, the sannyasin himself does not practice a specific yoga sadhana. The practices of yoga are necessary for householders who are living amongst the stresses and strains of worldly life, but not for the sannyasin, who lives in a relaxed ashram environment, free from personal problems.

For sannyasins yoga is not merely a practice, but a dedication of life, which is all fullness in itself. Service is the most important aspect of a sannyasins life, and brings peace and pleasure. Because they have accepted and understood the mind, yoga practices are unnecessary for sannyasins, although they may study and practice yoga in order to teach others.

Because his life is dedicated to the expansion of awareness, to transcending the animal nature and expressing the greatest, noblest, purest and most illumined aspect of spiritual life, a sannyasin seeks not to miss even one moment in indolence, or one breath in carelessness. In a sense, the sannyasin is meditating all day, closely watching his mind and its reactions, even in the midst of duties and responsibilities. He lives above matter and stabilises his awareness, while having every dealing with matter. It is a mistake to try to live the spiritual life exclusively, so in the ashram environment, the spiritual life and the material life are lived together. This is the path of modern sannyas.

The attitude of a sannyasin

A sannyasin lives totally in the present, without regrets for the past or plans for the future. His only expectation is to lose all expectations. The more completely the awareness is maintained in the present, the more powerful the thoughts and actions become. The mind loses its power whenever its attention is drawn away from the task at hand and dwells on past worries or future fears and expectations. The sannyasin attempts to remain totally absorbed in the present activity, to the exclusion of all other thoughts. He is not even concerned with whether he is happy or unhappy. In this way, his mind becomes very powerful and one-pointed.



The sannyasin takes a chance on life, by renouncing all the things that most people find most meaningful. He does not depend on name, fame, money, home or family as the basis for meaning in his life. Many people hold on to their rigid life patterns, possessions and values for fear of discovering that their lives are totally meaningless. The sannyasin releases his conformity and lets go of rigid thinking and living, in an effort to find freedom. He takes a chance, not knowing whether he will lose everything or gain everything. One cannot be a sannyasin without making that jump for the sake of freedom. The essential difference between a sannyasin and a non-sannyasin is that one forsakes all in a bid for freedom, while the other clings to the bondage of false security.