Showing posts with label KLF. Show all posts
Showing posts with label KLF. Show all posts

Tuesday 19 August 2014

Cliff






This picture is incredibly rare - that's "The Duchess", or "The Dutch".

That's Savile's MOTHER...

Dead since 1973.


"Cliff Richard, whose home is near to where Madeleine McCann disappeared, with Winston Churchill's close friend Lord Boothby, who reportedly was involved with child sex rings for the elite..."


The Krays were not psychotic (or even violent) prior to their National Service - then they spontaneously developed Multiple Personalities.

They are a product of the Tavistock Institute.

They main criminal racket was not Fruit Machines, it was little boys for the Cliveden Set.



Anonymous commented on the 1967 Tattingstone suitcase murder.

"The Scotland Yard Savile inquiry should extend to Suffolk...

"The Krays had property at Bildeston where they were involved with local youth clubs and giving children donkey rides etc.

"Just across the Essex border lived Ronnie's gay lover Tom Driberg MP."


"Apparently Kray had access to many London care homes and would have boys delivered to parties at DJ Alan ” fluff” Freeman’s large flat over a music shop in East London. 

"There they would meet with show biz types and DJs including Jimmy Saville, Joe Meeks and on occasion Beatles manager Brian Epstein."





"Apparently Kray had access to many London care homes and would have boys delivered to parties at DJ Alan ” fluff” Freeman’s large flat over a music shop in East London. 

"There they would meet with show biz types and DJs including Jimmy Saville, Joe Meeks and on occasion Beatles manager Brian Epstein."


According to this source - Archives - the Krays ran a paedophile ring.

"What was involved was the systematic abuse of ten-to-twelve-year-old boys, one of whom subsequently became fairly well known as a singer. 

"Another, rather less fortunate,wound up in six pieces in two suitcases... 

"The police uncovered a large-scale juvenile pimping operation centred on a house in a Suffolk village (Tattington) owned by Ronnie Kray. 

(The Kray twins had huge property interests in East Anglia). 

"Some of the boys were obtained via a close friend of (Benjamin) Britten's in London, who named him as one of the beneficiaries of the 'service': other'customers' included Lord Boothby (who frequently shared boys with Ronnie Kray himself) and the record producer Joe Meek. 

"At least two other people died in the aftermath of Bernard's murder as the twins sealed up the leaks."


"Joe Meek: addicted to amphetamines and obsessed with séances and the occult.

"He had been questioned by police about the 'Suitcase Murder'...

"The dismembered remains of 17-year-old Bernie Oliver were found in two suitcases in a field in Tattingstone in Suffolk...

"Bernie had lived close to Joe's Holloway Road studio...

"And Joe ... had been arrested for cottaging in 1963...

"Joe committed suicide less than a month after the discovery of the body..."




The Kray twins ran a bodyguard and 'protection' business for Hollywood stars, such as Frank Sinatra, and for Arab princes.


"At a big London railway station in the spring of 1970, a plastic carrier bag was found in the regular search for bombs before the station closed for the night.

"The contents were an odd assortment of letters and photos, which seemed to have been taken at a kinky party attended by some well-known figures in entertainment.

"One in particular showed a pop singer who masquerades under a Christian persona; dressed in women’s underwear he was pictured with young boys.

"The bag was duly taken to the station office and, as a senior rail worker wrote out a report for the lost property office, two MI5 men and a special branch officer arrived and demanded the photos."

T Stokes





THE ABDUCTION OF MADELEINE McCANN - A Modern Fairy Tale



After a gruelling professional year slogging away with nothing but exploitation and degenerating services for a reward, what better way could there be to wind down than a nightmare holiday in Portugal? This was the experience of the British family the Maccans in 2007, when their three year-old daughter Madeleine was abducted while on holiday. The abduction of Madeleine Mccann is like a fairy story, a cautionary tale that encapsulates the depths to which Thatcherism and free capitalism has taken western democracy.

Madeleine Mccann was abducted on the night of May 3rd 2007, while she was asleep in the family's holiday apartment on the Algarve coast of Portugal, in the village of Praia Da Luz. The abduction happened while the parents were dining out with friends a few yards away, and it was discovered when the mother, Kate McCann, slipped away to check on her children at 10 p.m.

There are several important witnesses to the abduction. The first was the father, Gerry McCann, who returned to the apartment at around 9.05 p.m. to check on the children, and when he entered their room he found that the door was open wider than usual, but because it was an unfamiliar door and he had no reason to suppose it, he did not check to see if there was someone hiding in the room. When he left the apartment, he met a friend outside and stopped to talk to him.

While they were talking outside, a second witness, Jane Tanner, who was one of the seven British friends who were dining with the McCanns at the Ocean Club nearby, returned to the apartment building at about 9.15, and as she passed by them, she saw a man with dark, collar-length hair walking across the end of the alley with a small child asleep in his arms. The child had no shoes on and was wrapped in a blanket. The man carrying her looked Mediterranean. He was wearing long trousers and a heavy coat, so he didn’t look like a holiday tourist.
The third witness was George Burke, who saw a small girl with a remarkable resemblance to Madeleine being hauled along by a vicious-looking man and a woman in the area very early the next morning. It was dark, at 6.00 a.m., and no one else was about. The group was hurrying towards the Lagos marina and railway station and they looked very suspicious. Mr Burke informed the police, but they didn't take the incident seriously.

Given the timing of this incident (6.00 a.m.) and the age of the child (a toddler aged under 4), and given the vicious impression created by the man, George Burke's sighting is highly significant, and it cannot reasonably be ignored by any investigation into the abduction.
Four months prior to the abduction of Madeleine McCann, another attempt at an abduction is known to have occurred in this area, involving a girl of the same age and of very similar appearance. She had blonde hair and is said to resemble Madeleine McCann quite closely. Her name was Carolina Santos, and her parents were working in their cafe when their child was taken on Christmas Day. The parents happened by chance to go out and they spotted her with a man of Moroccan appearance 300 yards away. The man ran off. The Santos parents offered to help the Portuguese police after the abduction of Madeleine, but they were never questioned by them.

On May 9th, just five days after the abduction of Madeleine Mccann, a Norwegian tourist, Marie Olli, reported that she believed she had seen Madeleine at a Moroccan petrol station asking a man, "Can I see Mummy soon?" This incident is again significant because it corresponds with the experience of the Santos family and their Moroccan-looking abductor. Being locals in the area, the Santos family are likely to be reliable in their identification of Mediterranean castes.
All these witness accounts have corresponding features that authenticate them, and certainly no investigation into the abduction of Madeleine McCann could discount them.

Yet another abduction had occurred in the area in 2004, some 15 miles from Praia Da Luz, when 8 year-old Joana Cipriano disappeared from her home in Figueira near Portimao. The mother believes that her daughter was taken for a German couple. She claims that the Portuguese police had beaten a confession of murder out of her and she is in jail, retracting the confession.

The McCanns' experience with the Portuguese police supports the claim made by this mother, while her experience clarifies the situation for the McCanns with the Portuguese police.
Given these eyewitnesses, why did the investigation turn out the way it did?

It has been reported that after the abduction, the police investigated the church where Mr and Mrs McCann prayed for their daughter after the abduction. Then they turned their suspicions on to an ex-patriot Briton who lived in the village, Robert Murat, who was harassed with intensive questioning and house-searching, and who, despite there being no evidence to connect him with the incident, was subsequently declared an official suspect by the police. It is reported that Robert Murat had sat in on the police interviews with the friends who had dined with the McCanns when the abduction occurred. The police were using him as an interpreter in these interviews. This shows that he was also being used by the police for their own convenience when they named him as a suspect, and that they didn't have any other grounds to suspect him.
The same applies to the McCanns. They joined him on the list of suspects after they mounted a sustained media campaign to help get their daughter back and revitalize the investigation. The police theory to justify their campaign was that the parents had murdered their daughter in the apartment and had faked the abduction to cover this up. This is clearly not consistent with the McCann's efforts to keep the case awake when the public and the police wished to forget it, and it corresponds with the experience of the mother of Joana Cipriano in jail. If the McCanns had murdered their daughter as proposed, why did they repeatedly return to Portugal to revive the investigation? The police case is illogical and groundless.

In November, the police were willing to absolve the McCanns of responsibility and of murder by using another fantasy, and a very peculiar one it was, which was published in the Portuguese newspaper Publico. This theory was that an intruder had broken into the apartment after all, "to look at her [Madeleine], touch her or smell the fragile little blonde girl with big eyes", that she had screamed, and in his panic, the intruder had suffocated her. Aside from the elaborate perversity of the story and its motive, there has been no attempt by the newspaper or the police to explain why the intruder had carried his accident away with him afterwards.

The behaviour of the McCanns over the loss of their little daughter has been entirely inconsistent with a cover-up of any kind, or with any guilt. Their persistence can only be explained by the parents' desire to keep in touch with the situation and their daughter‘s plight and their need to have their daughter returned to them. Their campaign, and the media circus that went with it, seems to be the reason that they have been listed as suspects in the abduction.

Instead of the compassion and public support that their situation merited, their campaign has unleashed a maelstrom of abuse and accusation and lawyers against them, all of which has exploited the situation. The British press has taken the side of anyone who wished to attack the McCanns, whether it was someone expressing a personal dislike for them, or a lawyer threatening them with a private prosecution, or the attempts of the Portuguese police to implicate them. And, as is typical of Thatcherist public services, the McCanns have had to abandon the official police service and hire their own detectives to find their daughter.
From the beginning, the Portuguese police have acted as though the whole incident was British, and that the jurisdiction for it is properly covered by their own competence, but this was an international incident, and national police services appear to have difficulty in pursuing international cases like this. The McCanns case shows that there is a need for an international police force in Europe, like the American FBI, which is able to investigate freely across national borders while being responsible to the respective national police forces.

In November, when the Portuguese case against the McCanns looked to be floundering, a British lawyer mounted an alternative case against the McCanns of abandonment of their child, which held them responsible for the abduction in a different way. This lawyer's idea of a family holiday seems to consist of the parents standing guard outside their chalet or apartment, armed perhaps with guns and machetes, to protect their children (and themselves) from their species and its society. The lawyer's case accepts child abduction as a way of life, and it gives the parents the responsibility for it, which is another abuse against the family. Why should parents be responsible for the abduction of their children? It should be the responsibility of the State and the public.

In December, when Christmas was approaching, the Portuguese investigators complained that the McCanns were receiving scandalously privileged treatment, and that if they had been Portuguese, they would be in jail. This is confirmed by the claims of the Cipriano mother in jail, and it shows that the only reason the McCanns are not in a Portuguese prison is because of the international trouble that this would cause to their police.

The story of the McCanns is one of innocence (Madeleine) being abducted while on holiday, and innocence (the McCanns) being vilified and abused by their society while trying to get their daughter back. In both cases, innocence is under attack from its society, which is supposed to be innocent itself, and which clearly is not.

Like any fairy story, there must be an Evil Witch in this one, and there is. Surely it is time for the West to reckon the appalling damage that Mrs Thatcher and her free economy has unleashed on western democracy. Our nations are meant to be evolving in talent and experience of self-government, while civilizing itself along the way, but the free capitalism of Thatcherism has liberated the lowest denominator of human values everywhere. These attacks against childhood and children belong to this trend and arise from the same source. It is one of the effects of the anti-talented economy of free capitalism.

Christmas 2007

August 2008: A definite sighting revealed - top secret and ignored since June 2007

In August 2008, when the files of the Portuguese police were released, they were found to contain the report of a clear sighting of Madeleine McCann in Holland just three days after her abduction. A shop employee named Ana Stam had reported to the police an encounter that she'd had with a three or four year-old girl who strongly resembled Madeleine McCann. The child had told her "My name is Maddy." When Stam spoke to her about the woman that she was with, the child said, "She is not my mummy. They took me from my holiday." The child-like clarity and simplicity of these statements clearly look authentic.

The child had entered the Ballonnerie de Ballondrukkerij party shop in Amsterdam accompanied by a couple with two other children, possibly not theirs. The little girl said to the witness, "Do you know where my mummy is?" When Stam told her that her mummy was elsewhere in the shop, the girl replied, "She is not my mummy. She took me from my mummy." When asked where she had last seen her mummy, the child replied, "They took me from my holiday." The child couldn't answer questions about what sort of holiday it was or where. When the girl told Ana Stam that her name was Maddy, Stam assumed she meant Maggie because the name Maddy was unfamiliar to her, and the child repeated that it was Maddy. The child spoke with a clean English accent, while the woman with her spoke English with a French accent and the man apparently Portuguese. The couple acted oddly when Stam asked if she could help.

Stam went to the police in June 2007 when she saw news about the kidnapping.
This report had been in the police files for two months when they named the Mccanns as suspects or 'aguidos' in the assumed murder of their daughter.

The Portuguese police files have also revealed a trail of good sightings across Holland and Belgium in the days following the abduction. In one case the witness was bewildered by the fact that the child and the couple with her did not resemble each other and spoke different languages. None of these sightings was investigated.

Perhaps the difference of languages prevented the Portuguese police from recognizing the authenticity of the Amsterdam sighting.

A sighting in the Caribbean in May 2008

In May 2008 the British captain of a chartered yacht, Trevor Francis, made a sighting of a girl he is convinced was Madeleine McCann on the island of Margarita in the Caribbean. He saw her with three women in a restaurant on a marina which was on a direct shipping route to Portugal. He told British police: "I noticed that the little girl was white with fair hair. There are sometimes white children in Venezuela but not as fair as this child. She really stood out. She was the absolute image of the missing Madeleine McCann. She was very sullen-looking and refused to eat. She looked unhappy and out of place. I shuffled in my seat so I could see 'Madeleine' clearly. I was about four or five feet away from the little girl. Her eyes met mine as I walked past and that's when I saw the little blemish in her right eye - it was like a little fleck."
There have also been several sightings of Madeleine in Brazil which is connected to Portugal by language.







People believe that where there’s smoke there’s fire, but sometimes there is just a smoke machine.

By treating Cliff Richard as though he were a bank robber or a mass murderer, the police from Thames Valley and South Yorkshire, aided and abetted by the BBC and a Sheffield lay justice, have blasted his reputation around the world without giving him the first and most basic right to refute the allegation.

Last year, apparently, a complaint was made to police that the singer had indecently assaulted a youth in Sheffield a quarter of a century ago. The police had a duty to investigate, seek any corroborating evidence, and then – and only if they had reasonable grounds to suspect him of committing an offence – to give him the opportunity to refute those suspicions before a decision to charge is made.

But here, police subverted due process by waiting until Richard had left for vacation, and then orchestrating massive publicity for the raid on his house, before making any request for interview and before any question could arise of arresting or charging him.

Police initially denied “leaking” the raid, but South Yorkshire Police finally confirmed yesterday afternoon that they had been “working with a media outlet” – presumably the BBC – about the investigation. They also claimed “a number of people” had come forward with more information after seeing coverage of the operation – which leads one to suspect that this was the improper purpose behind leaking the operation in the first place.  This alone calls for an independent inquiry.

The BBC and others were present when the five police cars arrived at Richard’s home, and helicopters were already clattering overhead. Police codes require that “searches must be conducted with due consideration for the property and privacy of the occupier and with no more disturbance than necessary” – here, the media were tipped off well ahead of time, and a smug officer read to the cameras a prepared press statement while the search was going on.




Thursday 17 July 2014

MH-17





Pay dirt. 
No flight, no dead people. 
End of.

BTS - Bureau of Traffic Statistics showing Flight 11 never departed from Boston Logan international Airport on 9/11/2001.


"8. It is possible to create an incident which will demonstrate convincingly that a Cuban aircraft has attacked and shot down a chartered civil airliner enroute from the United States to Jamaica, Guatemala, Panama or Venezuela. The destination would be chosen only to cause the flight plan route to cross Cuba. The passengers could be a group of college students off on a holiday or any grouping of persons with a common interest to support chartering a non-scheduled flight.

 a. An aircraft at Eglin AFB would be painted and numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered aircraft belonging to a CIA proprietary organization in the Miami area. At a designated time the duplicate would be subsituted for the actual civil aircraft and would be loaded with the selected passengers, all boarded under carefully prepared aliases. The actual registered aircraft would be converted to a drone. 

 b. Take off times of the drone aircraft and the actual aircraft will be scheduled to allow a rendezvous south of Florida. From the rendezvous point the passenger-carrying aircraft will descend to minimum altitude and go directly into an auxiliary field at Eglin AFB where arrangements will have been made to evacuate the passengers and return the aircraft to its original status. The drone aircraft meanwhile will continue to fly the filed flight plan. When over Cuba the drone will being transmitting on the inter- national distress frequency a "MAY DAY" message stating he is under attack by Cuban MIG aircraft. The transmission will be interrupted by the destruction of aircraft which will be triggered by radio signal. This will allow IACO radio stations in the Western Hemisphere to tell the US what has happened to the aircraft instead of the US trying to "sell" the incident.






Ihor,

Events are moving rapidly in Crimea. Our friends in Washington expect more decisive actions from your network.

I think it's time to implement the plan we discussed lately. Your job is to cause some problems to the transport hubs in the south-east in order to frame-up the neighbor.

It will create favorable conditions for Pentagon and the Company to act.

Do not waste time, my friend.

Respectfully,
JP

Jason P. Gresh
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Assistant Army Attaché
U.S. Embassy, Kyiv
Tankova 4, Kyiv, Ukraine 04112



"In the Church, attacks are often perpetrated through rumour - in the Church, a rumour is a powerful commodity - much more powerful than Fact.

In the Church, "Fact" don't mean nuthhin' : rumour, SPECULATION - "The Pastor sleepin' wi' Billy-Jo Mamma" - can ruin a man instantaneously!

In that area, "Fact" is not an argument ; because, you have Speculation Science..." 
- Bro. Steve Cokely.



Obama is reacting well. He is refusing to take it seriously.

Ignore the War Provocation...

He has already spoken to Putin and promised to provide whatever support and cooperation necessary "to find out what happened".

He knows what this is.

No-one saw a missile. NO-ONE.





"The Young Poland of Lelewel and Worcell demands the re-creation of the Polish state and rollback of the 1772-95 partitions of Poland. But they go much further, laying claim to Poland in its old Jagiellonian borders, stretching from the shores of the Baltic to the shores of the Black Sea. This includes an explicit denial that any Ukrainian nation exists. In the orbit of Young Poland is the poet Adam Mickiewicz, a close friend of Mazzini’s who was with him last year during the Roman Republic. Mickiewicz argues that Poland is special because it has suffered more than any other nation; Poland is “the Christ among nations.” Mickiewicz dreams of uniting all the west and south Slavs against the “tyrant of the north,” the “barbarians of the north.” By this he means Russia, the main target. Young Poland’s program also foreshadows the obvious conflict with Young Germany over Silesia.



Young Russia means the anarchist Mikhail Bakunin and the aristocratic ideologue Aleksandr Herzen. Herzen is an agent of Baron James Rothschild of Paris. Right after the Crimean War, Herzen will start publishing “The Polar Star” and “The Bell,” both leak sheets for British secret intelligence that will build up their readership by divulging Russian state secrets. Herzen’s obvious target is Czar Alexander II, the ally of Lincoln. Herzen prints the ravings of Bakunin, who preaches pan-Slavism, meaning that Russia will take over all the other Slavic nations. “Out of an ocean of blood and fire there will rise in Moscow high in the sky the star of the revolution to become the guide of liberated mankind.” Vintage Bakunin. If Mazzini relies on the stiletto, for Bakunin it is “the peasant’s axe” that will bring down the “German” regime in St. Petersburg.



Herzen is interested in sabotaging Alexander II and his policy of real, anti-British reform in Russia. To block real industrial capitalist development, he preaches reliance on the aboriginal Slavic village, the mir, with “communal ownership of the land” plus the ancient Slavic workshop, the artel. The mir will never build the Trans-Siberian railway. Herzen sees Russia as the “center of crystallization” for the entire Slavic world. Herzen, although he is usually called a “westernizer,” is totally hostile to western civilization. He writes of the need for a “new Attila,” perhaps Russian, perhaps American, perhaps both, who will be able to tear down the old Europe. In the moment when the British will seem so close to winning everything, Herzen will support Palmerston’s Polish insurrection of 1863, and will lose most of his readers. Once the American Civil War is over, the British will have little use for Herzen. By then, London will be betting on the nihilist terrorists of the Narodnaya Volya (People’s Will), who will finally kill Alexander II, plus the Russian legal Marxists, all British agents. But already today we can see the conflicts ahead between Young Poland and Young Russia. In the conflicts among Mazzini’s national chauvinist operations, we can see the roots of the slaughter of World War I."



The Senior Vice President of Malaysian Airlines says that most, but not all, (233 of 295) of the nationalities of the "Victims" have been confirmed; that's ridiculous.

You have a computer and their passport details.

How can you not know..,?




"This dramatic battle between good and evil was precisely the kind of myth that Leo Strauss had taught his students would be necessary to rescue the country from moral decay.

It might not be true, but it was necessary, to re-engage the public in a grand vision of America's destiny, that would give meaning and purpose to their lives.

The Straussians started to create a worldview which is a fiction.

The world is NOT divided into good and evil.

The battle in which we are engaged is NOT a battle between good and evil.

The United States, as anyone who observes understands, has done some good and some bad things.

It's like any great power. This is the way history is.

But they wanted to create a world of moral certainties, so therefore they invent mythologies—fairytales—describing any force in the world that obstructs the United States as somehow Satanic, or associated with evil..."


DETROIT — Vice President Joe Biden said Thursday that the Malaysia Airlines plane that went down over Ukraine earlier in the day “apparently” was “shot down — shot down, not an accident, blown out of the sky.”

He also said there may have been Americans on board the jet.






Putin is the most intelligent and capable world leader on the scene today.



They're exercises. 

Just exercises.




"Screw the [New York] Times, they're our enemies."

President Richard M. Nixon, 1971




"Mr McCain fought in Vietnam. I think that he has enough blood of peaceful citizens on his hands. It must be impossible for him to live without these disgusting scenes anymore. Mr McCain was captured and they kept him not just in prison, but in a pit for several years, anyone would go nuts."

Response to John McCain's tweet: "Dear Vlad, The Arab Spring is coming to a neighbourhood near you."

Ilyas Akhmadov: Indicted Chechen Mass-Murderer
Lives in Virginia on a State Dept. stipend.


Ilyas Akhmadov discusses his book "The Chechen Struggle: Independence Won and Lost." Told from his perspective, the book is a uniquely candid, inside account of Chechnya’s two wars against Russia, its interwar attempt to establish national institutions, and the splintering and eventual radicalization of the resistance. The book captures the predicament of Chechen moderates who unsuccessfully sought to attain international assistance to stop the war and avert its catastrophic consequences: the mass slaughter of Chechens, the spread of the conflict throughout the region, and Russia’s slide into dictatorship.

For more visit:


The problem with nearly all 911 research regarding this issue of the BTS discrepancies of flights 11 & 77 is it all ends here, and no more questions are asked. If you ask the right question, you usually get the right answer. If you ask the wrong question, you usually get the wrong answer. If you ask no more questions at all, you will get no more answers. And thus, it is left there, with no more questions. So lets start asking some of the questions which have never been asked or pursued.

Question # 1. Do we have any evidence that shows the passengers at the airport, boarding terminals or boarding the planes?

Answer: No - Not on any of the "4 flights" of 911 [Is this not a huge red flag already? If such footage existed, and by all means if the governments story is true, there is indeed footage of all the passengers at the airports and boarding terminals. Yet not an inch of footage of this video has ever once been produced.] **The answer why there is no video of any of the passengers at any of the terminals or airports is because it simply does not exist and never did exist. 

Question # 2.
 How does a passenger purchase a ticket for a Flight which will not fly on 9/11?

This is conceivably possible. Flights are canceled all the time and combined with other flights according to the dictates of the airlines and passenger loads any given day. Yet there are no records of any such occurrences on 9/11. The official story is set in stone. The people boarded Flight 11. They boarded AT Flight 11's gate. 

Question #3. How does a passenger fly on a flight which never takes off on 911? 

Now this is impossible. This is where the tougher questions are needed. The passengers all disappeared and that, seamlessly, on 911. This is beyond dispute. And yet they never could have boarded a flight that did not take off. They might have conceivably purchased tickets for these flights, but they could have never actually gotten onto flight 11, boarded and then taken off. Why? Because the BTS database is accurate and also definite. Flight 11 did not depart on 911. Unfortunately this presents a conundrum and a wall of confusion that none stepped over till now.

Question # 4.
 Where did the passengers go, if not onto flight 11? 

Were they herded into rooms at the airports as some theorists have assumed? Were they tricked onto boarding another flight, which they thought was flight 11, a sort of 'patsy plane' if you will? These are all legitimate questions because we do after all have the collective disappearance of of 92 souls. They had to have gone somewhere, because they couldn't have gone nowhere. They didn't board or fly on flight 11. We have no reports of any disturbances at any of the airports, much less Boston Logan, which would likely happen if airport officials tried to sequester 92 people trying to board a flight inside an International airport with hundreds of witnesses all around, and yet they collectively disappeared. Not onto flight 11. And not sequestered at the airports. Then where? 

At this point we are running out of ground to walk on unless we pass over the most difficult bridge of all and ask the most unpleasant of all questions;

Question # 5.
 Were any of the passengers on flight 11 or any of the 4 planes part of the conspiracy of 9/11?

As an investigator, all things need to be considered. Regardless of peoples emotions, and all lines need to be investigated. The fact that there were no disruptions at any of the airports, indicates that the passengers disappeared seamlessly. Without struggle. Without commotion. Without notice. And without video surveillance. The fact the government has not produced a single video showing any of the passengers is likely because if they did so, it would prove upon analysis that the passengers were in a part of the airport they never should have been on 9/11. This is why the government cannot produce the video of any of the passengers on 911 at the airports, with the possible exception of Flight 93 which we will touch on later.

The fact that the passengers disappeared seamlessly would indicate that they were willing participants by and large. It is plausible to believe that some passengers were just regular people, and randomly chosen for death & disappearance on 9/11. The planners after all were doing as much for 3000 people at the World trade Center. A few more is nothing to them. But it is not plausible to believe this is the case for all of the passengers

This item is what I believe is an issue which cannot be answered without more data. Whether or not regular passengers were chosen and incorporated into these flights, or whether or not they were all in one way or another part of the conspiracy. Perhaps it is a mixture of real passengers and conspirators. It is beyond the scope of this article to deal with all of the passengers and possible connections to 911 planning, although there is a mountain of supporting evidence, when there should be none. And for at least 3 of the planes passengers in question, their disappearance at the airports deserve further investigation, for we know that the 3 groups of people from flights 11, 175 and 77 were not passengers on their respective flights. The fact that the passengers from these 3 groups, at 2 airports disappeared so seamlessly is indicative that they were possibly willing participants. Combined with the lack of video the government has released showing any of the passengers at any of the 3 airports, it surely isn't implausible to believe that they are in a position where they cannot produce the video without incriminating themselves. My belief is that they do have video of the 3 groups of people at the 2 airports (93 is not included here) but cannot release it because it will show the passengers in a part of the airport they were never supposed to have been. Which would of curse help citizen investigators come closer to determining how 911 was operationally pulled off regarding the passengers and 4 planes. Why else would they withhold it? 

It should be noted that all of the above, regarding Flight 11 was also repeated at Dulles International Airport. Done twice at 2 airports. The 2 flights which the BTS shows as never having taken off, flight 11 & 77, the two American airlinesplanes. One from Boston, one from Dulles. The passengers for the other ghost flight, 77, the flight which the BTS shows as never having taken off, by and large mirror what is described above with flight 11. All of the passengers of flight 77 disappeared, seamlessly, yet they didn't get onto or take off on flight 77, because the BTS shows it as never having taken off on 9/11. And likewise, no reports of commotion or disruptions at Dulles, as one would expect if an entire plane-load of passengers were being redirected against their wills, in a public International airport. I emphasize, that they disappeared seamlessly. Without notice. Without commotion, & as the passengers on the other ghost flight of 911, flight 11 at Boston Logan, without video surveillance. 

This constitutes our 2nd conundrum regarding the passengers and the 4 flights on 9/11. 2 groups of people, one from flight 11 at Boston and one from flight 77 at Dulles would both seamlessly disappear under similar circumstances. And both groups of people would never board either of the flights, 11 or 77. Because the BTS database tells us this flight never departed. Let the conundrum remain for now, and don't ignore it, because in it lies part of the solution to understanding how they operationally pulled off at least one layer of 911. 

We encounter our third conundrum with the photographic evidence of flight 175. Even from a casual observance of all the evidence of pictures and video we have of flight 175, it is quite obvious it was not a commercial airliner, much less flight 175 which had passengers on board.

Thus if commercial flight 175 did not hit the South Tower as we were all told, our third conundrum now becomes what happened to those passengers on flight 175? A third group of missing people. If they were not aboard that plane, and all evidence tells us they weren't, then where did the passengers from flight 175 go to? Were the planes switched in mid-air? Taken over by remote control and flown into the towers? Where o where did this third group of people, the passengers from flight 175 disappear to? Is anyone starting to see a pattern here? One group after another of the 4 groups of people on 911 have all sorts of difficulties with their stories and the story of their disappearance. 

As we move along to Flight 93 we will find even more issues. Though not quite the same, and as a matter of fact, we will get a glimpse of the key to understanding this mysteries outlined above. Something nobody was ever intended to read or see. It is simply an unintended consequence of 9/11 and something the planners of 911 couldn't ever plan for or forsee.

Flight 93 was boarded twice. By two groups of people at two separate locations at Newark Airport. We know this because of two credible eye-witnesses. This is also more then likely the reason why flight 93 was 41 minutes late in taking off on 9/11. We were never supposed to know or learn of this 2nd boarding for flight 93, this was one of those things they couldn't forsee. After closing it's door at the terminal, Flight 93 reopened the door to the plane, to allow Mark Bingham aboard. Mark Bingham has for all intents and purposes totally messed up and missed his plane. They literally re-opened the door to the airplane at the terminal jet-bridge and allowed him onto the plane.

Quote:
Mark Bingham: Flight 93

One passenger was late. Mark Bingham had overslept and his friend, Matthew Hall, drove madly from Manhattan to Newark. They screeched to a halt outside Terminal A at 7:40. Bingham leapt from the car, lugging the old, blue-and-gold canvas bag he'd used as a rugby player at the University of California at Berkeley a decade earlier.United attendants reopened the door to the boarding ramp and let him on the plane.
 Lucky he was that Flight 93 was 41 minutes late or he might have missed his flight.
After pulling away from the gate, flight 93 goes around the corner to pick up another 'charter' for the days flight, a second group of people. This was never reported on. Nor were you ever intended to so much as get a glimpse of this 2nd boarding. It happened as the result of a planning snafu. 

Quote:
Triton's Clayton White on other side of recruiting

"You might say Clayton White's life has come full circle since February 1996.

White’s career didn’t end there, however. He eventually made the NFL’s New York Giants as a free agent and spent three seasons in the league, the last one in 2002 with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers.

But the most lasting memory of White’s time in New York had nothing to do with football. "We had played a Monday night game in Denver, and flew back home the next morning," White said. "We landed in Newark, N.J., about 6:45 in the morning. We usually get off the plane on the tarmac and board a bus to get to our cars.

"I noticed another plane sitting next to ours because the people were walking to the plane across the tarmac instead of through the jetway.

"Two weeks later, as we’re taking another plane to a game, one of the stewardesses informed us the plane that had been boarding next to us was Flight 93 that crashed in Pennsylvania on 9/11. That was a very eerie feeling." - Fayetteville Observer (01/31/06)
Triton Clayton White saw something he wasn't supposed to see, because the planners of 911 did not take into consideration the possibility of charter flights offloading on the same tarmac they were to pick up this 2nd group of people with Flight 93. Triton Clayton White (New York Giant Football player) saw FLIGHT 93 being boarded on theTarmac at Newark, which is another separate boarding then when they picked people up at the terminal using a jet-bridge. That self same terminal at Newark, to this day, has a flag at it, where the hero's of 9/11 boarded their fateful flight. Make no mistake about it, the first group of people boarded at the terminal, and a 2nd group of people boarded on the Tarmac. All onto flight 93, and all of this at Newark on 9/11. 

But who is this 2nd group of people being boarded onto flight 93, and why the cloak and dagger boarding of a 2nd group of passengers onto Flight 93 on the tarmac, AFTER the boarding at the terminal?

This presents us with our 4th conundrum. There appears to be incredibly serious issues with each of the flights, their boardings, their departures, identities, destinations, and now this? 

STATUS: NO DEPARTURE: NO BOARDING: On flight 11, we have passengers which boarded and disappeared onto a plane which never took off and which video evidence plausibly shows to be a military drone.

STATUS: DEPARTURE & BOARDING: On flight 175, we have a different issue, as the plane which struck the towers was not commercial flight 175, with those passengers aboard, and also all sorts of plausible evidence that shows this plane to be a military drone as well.

STATUS: NO DEPARTURE: NO BOARDING: On flight 77, we have passengers which allegedly board and depart on a flight which never departed that day, according to BTS.

STATUS: DEPARTURE & TWO BOARDINGS: On flight 93, we have an unusual late passenger being let on the plane after missing it, as well as a second boarding on the tarmac after its first initial boarding at the terminal using a jet-bridge.


This is as far as my research has gone, sorry I cannot supply any answers or solutions beyond this, but feel free to chime in with your own research and ideas. Psyche. Just kidding. Actually, if your still with me, we are nearly done with wrapping up all the loose ends and tying it all together and seeing what happened on 911 as well as the most plausible explanation to all of the mysteries regarding the passengers and flights.

From here out, it is actually very simple. At Boston they did a variation of the disappearing coin trick, with an additional coin thrown in, Delta flight 1989, as we will see, and at Dulles, they used the disappearing deck trick. Simply put, the passengers of flight 77 at Dulles are the same group of people who we see on the SECOND BOARDING AT NEWARK AIRPORT. The passengers at Dulles caught an earlier flight which took them to Newark where they were to rendevouz with Flight 93, and did so successfully. Howbeit, there is a witness to this deception, Triton Clayton White, the New york Giant who saw Flight 93 boarding ON THE TARMAC. After its FIRST BOARDING AT THE TERMINAL.

At Boston Logan International Airport, they used a similar deception. Here, the passengers from both flights 11 & 175 are combined into one flight. It would eventually become delta flight 1989 and land at Cleveland International Airport... While flight 93, now having also the passengers from flight 77 from the 2nd boarding at Newark, will head to the same destination; Cleveland International Airport.

Stuart Air Force Base Mystery - Explained

Above Stuart air force base we are told that flight 11 and 175 nearly collided they got so close. We were also given snippets of this through air traffic control tapes. The explanation for this is as plausible as it is logical. This is where the 2 military drones which were to strike to world trade centers took off from. They would replace the flight path of Flight 175 as well as the path of flight 11, which up to this point was provided for by an electronic warfare plane which was one of "4" such aircraft in the air for the War games which were taking place on 9/11/2001. Sometime shortly after this, Flight 175 NOW HAVING BEEN REPLACED BY A MILITARY DRONE ON RADAR will change its transponder to Delta 1989, and make an emergency landing at Cleveland, with reports of a bomb aboard. This plane would contain roughly 200 people, and not only is it plausible that these people were the people from flights 11 & 175, it is highly probable and likely. Another plane, Flight 93, would also land at Cleveland airport. This was confirmed by both the Mayor of Cleveland, and United Airlines who publicly acknowledged on 911 and confirmed flight 93 landed in Cleveland. Flight 93 would end up being sequestered at one end of the airport, at the NASA Glenn hangar, while the other flight containing the other passengers from 11 & 175, now designated as Delta 1989, would be sequestered at the other end of the airport, at the I-X Exposition center. The two flights, Delta 1989 and United flight 93 had roughly 260 some people between them, the same number as the "4" flights, 11, 175, 77 & 93.