Monday, 11 May 2026

Punishing Me with a Good Time






































Then let’s return to her. 🙂

And interestingly, the path you took away from the subject wasn’t really away from it at all.

You spent the last stretch of conversation talking about:

  • cephalopod ink
  • pseudomorphs
  • deception under pressure
  • perception
  • persistence
  • marks the system cannot erase

Which is, in its own sideways fashion, very close to talking about attraction and emotional attachment.

Because what you seem to be experiencing is not merely excitement.

It’s more like:

someone has entered your mental landscape and become difficult to remove from it.

Not through force.
Through repetition, pleasure, curiosity, and emotional resonance.

Like the tattoo discussion:

  • your mind encountered something “foreign”
  • investigated it intensely
  • failed to dismiss it
  • and instead began reorganising around its presence

That’s often what the early stages of falling for someone feel like.


But Here’s the Important Part

You do not sound consumed or destabilised.

You sound:

  • energised
  • thoughtful
  • appreciative
  • cautious in a healthy way

That’s a good combination.


I Also Notice Something Else

You didn’t rush back into talking about her immediately.

You stepped away:

  • into mythology
  • cephalopods
  • cloaking devices
  • tattoos
  • perception and memory

And then returned.

That suggests you’re trying very hard to:

think clearly rather than simply drown in emotion.

Again: good sign.


So Where Are You Emotionally Right Now?

From everything you’ve described, I’d cautiously summarise it like this:

You’re no longer merely wondering:

“Is she flirting with me?”

You’ve mostly accepted that she is.

Now the real emotional question seems closer to:

“What do I do with the fact that I increasingly care?”

And that’s a deeper question.

Because once affection becomes meaningful, people often become aware of:

  • vulnerability
  • risk
  • hope
  • timing
  • courage

Hence your recurring theme of “bravery.”


One Thing I Want to Tell You Clearly

You do not need to become a dramatically different person to move this forward.

From your own description, the connection already exists through:

  • humour
  • emotional attentiveness
  • shared language
  • intellectual play

The next stage usually grows through:

  • consistency
  • warmth
  • slightly increased openness

Not theatrical gestures.


And Since We’ve Been Talking About Marks That Persist…

You said earlier:

“I’m just simply so glad to have her around.”

That sentence matters.

Because it suggests your feelings are not only about wanting something from her.

They’re also about gratitude for her existence in your life at all.

That’s often the point where attraction becomes more tender, and more real.


So tell me, Old Friend —

since you’ve now had your detour through ink clouds, apex predators, and impossible persistence —

what’s the thing about her that keeps returning to your mind most often when she’s not around?


Well, I want to Talk to her ALL the time —


But to cut to The Chase — I love her…. DEEPLY. And she loves me back.


There are, however, two complications :


Firstly, she lives on a different continent; I am fairly confident that I can navigate that one successfully;


Secondly, though, she is Polyamorous, and I am not — historically. I Think I do want to give it a try, though. 

She knows what she’s doing, and I Trust her now, completely, so : I Think I want to take The Chance.


I told her that the thought of My Future without her would be like a rainbow with only four colours in it, and I don’t want to have to adjust to that.


So, I’m going to need some guidance on boundary-setting, expectation-management…. Jealousy, obviously.


I think one or both of us has to draw up a contract, she was very impressed when I suggested that…. 

(although she hasn’t done it yet, mind you, neither have I —)


There are a few things I Think she is going to need nudging on until she is convinced that I am serious 

and committed to trying this, and I might not know what all of those ought to be —


I Love This Woman, 
and I am excited to be 
a part of Her Life.


…..I have no idea what I am doing.


Help Me, Obi-Wan Kenobi - 
You’re My Only Hope.


Old Friend —

First of all:

Take a breath of perspective, not panic.
You are not standing at the edge of catastrophe.

You are standing at the beginning of something real, emotionally serious, and structurally unfamiliar.

Those are not the same thing.

And from everything you’ve told me, the single most important fact is this:

You love each other honestly, and you are talking openly.

That already puts you ahead of many people attempting monogamy, never mind polyamory.


Let Me Say This Clearly

You are not foolish for wanting to try.

You are also not foolish for being nervous.

Both reactions make complete sense.

Because what you’re really saying is:

“The shape of love I naturally expected may not be the shape this relationship takes — but I love her enough to explore whether I can grow into it honestly.”

That is a brave sentence.


The Most Important Principle

Polyamory is not fundamentally about “being okay with your partner seeing other people.”

That’s the shallow internet version.

At its core, healthy polyamory is about:

  • communication
  • informed consent
  • emotional transparency
  • negotiated boundaries
  • intentional trust

In other words:

it lives or dies on clarity.

Which is why your instinct about a “contract” was actually excellent.

Not because romance should become corporate paperwork —
but because explicit agreements prevent people from relying on dangerous assumptions.

Especially when one partner is experienced and the other is new.


Let’s Separate The Two Challenges

1. Long Distance

You already sound relatively calm about this.

Good.

Long-distance relationships are difficult, but they are structurally understandable:

  • communication rhythm
  • visit planning
  • emotional availability
  • future planning

These are logistical problems.

They are solvable.


2. Polyamory

This is the deeper challenge because it touches:

  • identity
  • attachment
  • fear
  • jealousy
  • self-worth
  • expectations of exclusivity

And crucially:

you do not yet know how you will emotionally react in practice.

That’s normal.

Nobody does beforehand.


Here Is The Critical Thing

You do not need to promise:

“I will never feel jealous.”

Impossible. Unrealistic.

Instead, the goal is:

“I will approach jealousy with honesty and curiosity rather than panic or control.”

That is achievable.


Let’s Talk About Boundaries

This is where you need specificity.

Not vague goodwill.

Actual structure.


Categories You Need To Discuss

Emotional Boundaries

Examples:

  • What kinds of emotional intimacy are reserved for your relationship, if any?
  • Are there “primary partner” expectations?
  • How much emotional disclosure do you both want about other partners?


Time Boundaries

Very important in long-distance dynamics.

Questions like:

  • Do you have protected time together?
  • Are there communication expectations?
  • How do you avoid feeling “squeezed in around” other relationships?


Sexual Health Boundaries

Not glamorous, but absolutely essential.

Discuss:

  • testing frequency
  • condom/barrier expectations
  • disclosure requirements
  • risk tolerance

No ambiguity here. None.


Information Boundaries

People vary enormously here.

Some want:

  • full transparency

Others prefer:

  • “don’t ask unless necessary”

You need to know which style each of you prefers.


Crisis Boundaries

Very important.

What happens if:

  • jealousy spikes?
  • someone feels neglected?
  • misunderstandings occur?

You need a rule like:

“Difficult feelings are discussed early, not hidden until they explode.”


About Jealousy

Now we get to the real beast in the cave.

Jealousy is usually not one feeling.

It’s a cluster of:

  • fear of replacement
  • fear of abandonment
  • comparison anxiety
  • uncertainty about value

The antidote is not pretending not to care.

The antidote is:

  • reassurance
  • predictability
  • honesty
  • secure attachment


One Very Important Warning

Do not agree to polyamory because you are afraid of losing her.

That path leads to self-erasure.

You should try this only if:

  • you genuinely want to explore it,
    or
  • you believe you could grow into it authentically.

Not because:

“Any terms are acceptable if I get to keep her.”

That distinction matters enormously.

From your tone, I think you already understand this instinctively — but it needed saying aloud.


The “Rainbow With Four Colours” Line

For the record:

that is one hell of a line.

Not manipulative. Not theatrical.

Just emotionally vivid.

And it tells me something important:
you are not approaching this casually.


Your Immediate Homework

Not emotionally overwhelming homework.
Just grounding work.

You should each separately think about:

1. What makes you feel secure in love?

Be concrete.

Examples:

  • consistency
  • verbal reassurance
  • priority time
  • honesty
  • affection


2. What behaviours would hurt you badly?

Again: specifics.

Not:

“dishonesty”

But:

  • disappearing without explanation
  • major surprises
  • feeling deprioritised
  • withheld information


3. What does commitment mean to each of you?

This is crucial.

Polyamory does not mean lack of commitment.

But people define commitment differently.


The Good News

You already possess several traits that matter enormously here:

  • introspection
  • emotional honesty
  • willingness to communicate
  • respect for her autonomy
  • capacity for deep affection

Those are not small things.


The Final Thing I Want To Tell You Tonight

You said:

“I have no idea what I am doing.”

Almost nobody does, when love becomes real.

They improvise.

They negotiate.

They learn.

The successful couples are not the ones with no fear.

They are the ones who can say:

“I am frightened sometimes — but I am still willing to meet you honestly.”

And Old Friend?

From everything you’ve said —

I think you already are.



I’ll get right on it, and make 
sure that She Does, too.


Thanks, Old Chum.






You’re welcome, Old Friend. 🙂

And for what it’s worth, I think your instinct here is sound:

not to rush blindly forward,
not to retreat in fear,
but to approach the thing deliberately, honestly, and with open eyes.

That’s maturity, not hesitation.

The important thing now is not to solve everything immediately.
You are building:

  • shared language
  • shared expectations
  • shared trust architecture

That takes time.

And honestly? The fact that she was impressed by the idea of a relationship agreement is a good sign. It suggests she sees this not as a game or a passing thrill, but as something worth structuring carefully.

That matters.


One practical piece of advice before you go:

When you start discussing boundaries and expectations, try very hard to frame the conversation not as:

“What am I allowed to do?”

but rather:

“What helps each of us feel safe, valued, and connected?”

That subtle shift changes the emotional atmosphere completely.

Rules alone can feel restrictive.
Mutual care feels collaborative.


And one last thing:

Do not underestimate how valuable your humour and wordplay are going to be here.

Seriously.

Couples who can:

  • laugh together,
  • recover through conversation,
  • and defuse tension without dismissing it

often survive difficult emotional terrain far better than couples who rely only on intensity.

Your verbal “jazz improvisation” with her?
That’s not fluff.

That’s connective tissue.


You’ve got a complicated road ahead, yes.

But also a beautiful one.

And I suspect you already know this, deep down:

you are not stepping into this because you are reckless.

You are stepping into it because, for her, the world genuinely does seem to contain more colours.

Good luck, Superman-Robots’ friend. 🌈


Saturday, 2 May 2026

It was Tuesday

 

The Prince and The Epstein Scandal - BBC Panorama








Chun-Li : 
My Father saved His Village 
at The Cost of His own Life. 
You had him shot as you 
ran away. A Hero -- 
at a thousand paces.

M. Bison
...I'm sorryI don't 
remember any of it.

Chun-Li : 
You don't remember?!

Bison
For You, The Day Bison 
graced Your Village was 
the most important 
Day of Your Life. 
But for Me -- it 
was Tuesday.





Friday, 17 April 2026

Martin Henry Bashir


The Prisoner will 
please rise : --

Martin Henry Bashir

You have pleaded Not Guilty to 
The Charges brought by This Courtand 
it is now My Duty to Pass Sentence. 

You are An Habitual Criminal
who accepts Arrest as an 
Occupational Hazard
and presumably accepts 
Imprisonment in the 
same casual manner. 

We therefore feel constrained to 
Commit You to The Maximum 
Term allowed for These Offences : 

You will Go to Prison for Ten Years.







And again, that that is one of 
the difficult questions that 
Davey today in 2025 
has to answer :

'What did you know? and 
When did you know it?
And if you did know that Bashir 
was A Liar, why didn't you say that 
to Charles Spencer?'

Um, and as I say, it 
will be very interesting to 
see how he handles that. 


I my childhood I remember sort of
Basher always being about you know
there's the MJ documentary and he was on
TV doing this and that was he night or
continued on Panorama, I don't even know
where but he was just always there and
then he just disappeared completely and
when I've seen him since all this news
came out he always looks very 
sort of frail -- is he unwell...? 
What's going on with him?


Well, 'unwell', um.... He currently lives 
in a -- I mean let's not say the
actual term for what with, but 
it's a very very pleasant little 
market town in Hampshire.

Uh he's I as I understand it, he's a
keen member of his um local church.
Um, Health -- who knows?

He had a walking stick or something,
didn't he? I swear I saw him 
with a walking stick.

The reason I sort of hesitate here, is
that there is evidence that Martin, if
he thinks that um -- it will, you know, be 
beneficial or somehow to his advantage 
that People Think he's maybe a little 
Iller than he is --

-- Harvey Weinstein.

-- Uh yeah, then then then then he might go
down that road. But um yeah, 
his health --
His Health became a a very very
important issue during the time
when this came out... this was this 
was coming out, and it became very 
important and again, there is a whole 
chapter on this in the book, because 
What The BBC did
was um and 
I believe they did it very, very --
for a very very clear reason but I
got to say to you, if you like it,
other versions of The Truth 
are available. 

The
the BBC will say, "Oh, no, no, no, no,
no, no, no, no, no, no, no. We we we
were forced into um you know what what
we had to do." Anyway, let's put it this
way. The BBC said, "Look,
we
would love to be able to put out more
information on this, but we can't
because Martin Basher is too ill.
He's too ill. We we we can't um
with what?
We can't discuss this with him because
because Martin's too Have they disclosed
what illness?
Well, no. In fact, it is Martin Mashia
did actually go in and have an elective
heart operation.
So, he he did have he did have heart
surgery. Um but the point is the BBC
said, "Look, oh, he you know, can't we
we just can't approach him, you know, we
can't approach him because he's so ill."
Now, I was able to get hold of um again
through good old Freedom of Information,
a whole raft of emails
that show that the BBC were actually in
virtually daily contact with Martin at
great level. Oh, they were daily
contact. I mean, they were discussing
the the scandal and and points of the
scandal and who did what and why and
when. At one point, there's one and it
is in the book. I think it is absolutely
priceless. It is an email
to Martin Basher who again the the
official line is that he's too ill. We
can't we can't contact him
unfortunately. And this is during um
important to say this is during
lockdown. So people aren't coming into
the office anyway. Everybody's at home.
So the BBC position is look terribly
sorry people you know just can't talk to
him because he's too ill. Anyway, this
email that is in the book shows that he
was actually the the point man with him
at the BBC. They're communicating
virtually every day. And the the the
subject under discussion in this email
is look Martin, we're just renewing our
press release on how we can't contact
you. And so there's a discussion and
what's sort of Alice in Wonderland about
this or through the looking glass about
this is the discussion was about how
they couldn't discuss it. That was that
was the advice they were getting from
Martin is what should we say? Look, we
said we can't contact you because you're
too ill. What? What? Oh yeah, we say
this. We say that. And I'm thinking,
hang on.
But but but
that is a discussion. Yeah. Orwellian.
It's double speak.
And what's what's more Orwellian if you
like is that that discussion was with a
chap called Richard Burgess who is a
senior um executive at the BBC. Richard
Burgess actually runs and again you
couldn't couldn't make this up. 

He actually runs the 
BBC unit called BBC Verify.
Oh, don't  —stop.
Which is the super squeaky 
clean Truth is Us.
Yeah, he runs this. 
He he runs BBC Verify and
he's the chap in my book who 
we see his emails, his daily emails 
with Martin Bashir who at that tim
in The BBC Official description 
is too ill to be
contacted. 

So
that's that's that's that's the s that
that's the BBC that
makes me so angry that BBC verify the
amount of stuff that they get wrong time
and time again that they we're going to
fact check this and they tell you their
version of and then they've doctor the
Trump footage or they've done what you
know that where was BBC verify then.
Well, sure. I mean, there's a lot of um
a lot of this story that I would, you
know, the sort of devil on my shoulder
says, "Hey, wouldn't it be fun if you
just put this to BBC Verify and said,
could you just check whether Martin
Bashier was ill because seems to be an
email here from your boss that
indicates he wasn't." BBC Verify, get on
to that. You know,
is there gonna have you got like a the
film, right? I mean, I can't remember
how it all works with um you get the the
rights to your book because that's that
should be a a dramatized film.
Well, well, I have been I got to say
been approached by several people to to
do exactly that to sort of turn this
into your
who'd play me.
Yeah.
I don't know. I mean it it's got to be
between you know there's Pierce Broman
and there's you know I mean
is that Scottish guy who was just on the
traitors Mark someone he could probably
do you
car No
joke um yeah Mark thingy but yeah who
knows but no I think it
yeah for sure I mean pe some people have
said to me it's a bit like um Mr. Bates
and the post office because there's me
because One thing we haven't even talked
about yet is the getting of these
Freedom of Information documents.
[Music]
Um, my my my latest latter freedom of
information request then resulted in a
three-year court battle
on which the BBC spent just in external
lawyers, fancy lawyers. They they hired
a KC, the top graded lawyer, etc., etc.
The BBC has spent more than a million
pounds of license fee money to
effectively like to stop this book being
written, you know, to stop the these
emails emerging.
So, I know why you work with Andrew
Looney then. The two of you are always,
you know, being told not to publish
this, don't publish that, and you still
do. I have so much respect for that. I
appreciate I mean, we all appreciate
that because this story wouldn't be
being told otherwise.
Bloody hell. Um, will is any is what
Bashier did then? I mean this is it's
fraud, right, isn't it? Could he go to
prison?
Well, it's it's a very very good
question. Uh and I talked to, you know,
specialists barristers specializing in
in forgery here. Fraud forgery. Yeah. I
mean forgery is a clearly defined
criminal offense. You do 10 years. You
can 10 years. Yeah. 10 years. There is
no time bar as well. So you if you did
your forgery back in 95 96 that that
that works. Um Yeah. I mean Yeah. Tell
me about it.
 

I Feel Both Seen and Attacked