Saturday 29 April 2023

Philemon




The following is an entry from Black Book 5, pp. 163–78, which gives a preliminary sketch of cosmology of the Septem Sermones. 



16. I. 16. The force of the God is frightful. 

“You shall experience even more of it. You are in the second age. The first age has been overcome. This is the age of the rulership of the son, whom you call the Frog God. A third age will follow, the age of apportionment and harmonious power.”

 My soul, where did you go? Did you go to the animals? 

I bind the Above with the Below. I bind God and animal. Something in me is part animal, something part God, and a third part human. Below you serpent, within you man, and above you God. Beyond the serpent comes the phallus, then the earth, then the moon, and finally the coldness and emptiness of outer space. Above you comes the dove or the celestial soul, in which love and foresight are united, just as poison and shrewdness are united in the serpent. Shrewdness is the devil’s understanding, which always detects smaller things and finds chinks where you suspect none. If I am not conjoined through the uniting of the Below and the Above, I break down into three parts: the serpent, and in that or some other animal form I roam, living nature daimonically, arousing fear and longing. The human soul, living forever within you. The celestial soul, as such dwelling with the Gods, far from you and unknown to you, appearing in the form of a bird. Each of these three parts then is independent. Beyond me stands the celestial mother. Its counterpart is the phallus. Its mother is the earth, its goal is the heavenly mother. The celestial mother is the daughter of the celestial world. Its counterpart is the earth. The celestial mother is illuminated through the spiritual sun. Its counterpart is the moon. And just as the moon is the crossing to the dead of space, the spiritual sun is the crossing to the Pleroma, the upper world of fullness. The moon is the God’s eye of emptiness, just as the sun is the God’s eye of fullness. The moon that you see is the symbol, just as the sun that you see. Sun and moon, that is, their symbols, are Gods. There are still other Gods; their symbols are the planets. The celestial mother is a daimon among the order of the Gods, an inhabitant of the heavenly world. The Gods are favorable and unfavorable, impersonal, the souls of stars, influences, forces, grandfathers of souls, rulers in the heavenly world, both in space and in force. They are neither dangerous nor kind, strong, yet humble, clarifications of the Pleroma and of the eternal emptiness, configurations of the eternal qualities. Their number is immeasurably great and leads over to the one supreme fundamental, which contains all qualities in itself and itself has none, a nothing and everything, the complete dissolution of man, death and eternal life. Man becomes through the principium individuationis. He strives for absolute individuality, through which he ever increasingly concentrates the absolute dissolution of the Pleroma. Through this he makes the Pleroma the point that contains the greatest tension and is itself a shining star, immeasurably small, just as the Pleroma is immeasurably great. The more concentrated the Pleroma becomes, the stronger the star of the individual becomes. It is surrounded by shining clouds, a heavenly body in the making, comparable to a small sun. It emits fire. Therefore it is called: εγω [ειμι] συμπλανοζυμιν αστηρ.1 Just like the sun, which is also such a star, which is a God and grandfather of souls, the star of the individual is also like the sun, a God and grandfather of the souls. He is visible from time to time, just as I have described him. His light is blue, like that of a distant star. He is far out in space, cold and solitary, since he is beyond death. To attain individuality, we need a large share of death. Therefore it is called ει εοι εστε,2 since just as an innumerable number of men rule the earth, so a countless number of stars and of Gods rule the celestial world. To be sure, this God is the one who survives the death of men. To him for whom solitude is Heaven, he goes to Heaven; to him for whom it is Hell, he goes to Hell. Whoever does not follow the principium individuationis to its end becomes no God, since he cannot bear individuality. The dead who besiege us are souls who have not fulfilled the principium individuationis, or else they would have become distant stars. Insofar as we do not fulfill it, the dead have a claim on us and besiege us and we cannot escape them. [Image]3 The God of the frogs or toads, the brainless, is the uniting of the Christian God with Satan. His nature is like the flame; he is like Eros, but a God; Eros is only a daimon. The one God, to whom worship is due, is in the middle. You should worship only one God. The other Gods are unimportant. Abraxas is to be feared. Therefore it was a deliverance when he separated himself from me. You do not need to seek him. He will find you, just like Eros. He is the God of the cosmos, extremely powerful and fearful. He is the creative drive, he is form and formation, just as much as matter and force, therefore he is above all the light and dark Gods. He tears away souls and casts them into procreation. He is the creative and created. He is the God who always renews himself, in days, in months, in years, in human life, in ages, in peoples, in the living, in heavenly bodies. He compels, he is unsparing. If you worship him, you increase his power over you. Thereby it becomes unbearable. You will have dreadful trouble getting clear of him. The more you free yourself from him, the more you approach death, since he is the life of the universe. But he is also universal death. Therefore you fall victim to him again, not in life but in dying. So remember him, do not worship him, but also do not imagine that you can flee him since he is all around you. You must be in the middle of life, surrounded by death on all sides. Stretched out, like one crucified, you hang in him, the fearful, the overpowering. But you have in you the one God, the wonderfully beautiful and kind, the solitary, starlike, unmoving, he who is older and wiser than the father, he who has a safe hand, who leads you among all the darknesses and death scares of dreadful Abraxas. He gives joy and peace, since he is beyond death and beyond what is subject to change. He is no servant and no friend of Abraxas. He himself is an Abraxas, but not unto you, but in himself and his distant world, since you yourself are a God who lives in faraway realms and who renews himself in his ages and creations and peoples, just as powerful to them as Abraxas is to you. You yourself are a creator of worlds and a created being. You have the one God, and you become your one God in the innumerable number of Gods. As a God, you are the great Abraxas in your world. But as a man you are the heart of the one God who appears to his world as the great Abraxas, the feared, the powerful, the donor of madness, he who dispenses the water of life, the spirit of the tree of life, the daimon of the blood, the death bringer. You are the suffering heart of your one star God, who is Abraxas to his world. Therefore because you are the heart of your God, aspire toward him, love him, live for him. Fear Abraxas, who rules over the human world. Accept what he forces upon you, since he is the master of the life of this world and none can escape him. If you do not accept, he will torment you to death and the heart of your God will suffer, just as the one God of Christ suffered the heaviest in his death. The suffering of mankind is without end, since its life is without end. Since there is no end where none sees an end. If mankind has come to an end, there is none who would see its end and none who could say that mankind has an end. So it has no end for itself, but it certainly does for the Gods. The death of Christ took no suffering away from the world, but his life has taught us much; namely, that it pleases the one God if the individual lives his own life against the power of Abraxas. The one God thus delivers himself from the suffering of the earth into which his Eros plunged him; since when the one God saw the earth, he sought its procreation, and forgot that a world was already given to him in which he was Abraxas. So the one God became human. Therefore the one in turn pulls man up to him and into him, so that the one becomes complete again. But the freeing of man from the power of Abraxas does not follow man’s withdrawing from the power of Abraxas—no one can pull away from it—but through subjugating himself to it. Even Christ had to subjugate himself to the power of Abraxas, and Abraxas killed him in a gruesome manner. Only by living life can you free yourself from it. So live it to such a degree that it befits you. To the degree that you live it, you also fall victim to the power of Abraxas and his dreadful deceptions. But to the same degree the star God in you gains in longing and power, in that the fruit of deception and human disappointment falls to him. Pain and disappointment fill the world of Abraxas with coldness, all of your life’s warmth slowly sinks into the depths of your soul, into the midpoint of man, where the far blue starlight of your one God glimmers. If you flee Abraxas from fear, you escape pain and disappointment and you remain terrified, that is, out of unconscious love you cling to Abraxas and your one God cannot catch fire. But through pain and disappointment you redeem yourself, since your longing then falls of its own accord like a ripe fruit into the depths, following gravity, striving toward the midpoint, where the blue light of the star God arises. So do not flee from Abraxas, do not seek him. You feel his coercion, do not resist him, so that you shall live and pay your ransom. The works of Abraxas are to be fulfilled, for consider that in your world you yourself are Abraxas and force your creature to fulfil your work. Here, where you are the creature subjugated to Abraxas, you must learn to fulfill the work of life. There, where you are Abraxas, you compel your creatures. You ask, why is all this so? I understand that it seems questionable to you. The world is questionable. It is the unending infinite folly of the Gods, which you know is unendingly wise. Surely it is also a crime, an unforgivable sin, and therefore also the highest love and virtue. So live life, do not flee Abraxas, provided that he compels you and you can recognize his necessity. In one sense I say to you: do not fear him, do not love him. In another sense I say: fear him, love him. He is the life of the earth, that says enough. You need to recognize the multiplicity of the Gods. You cannot unite all into one being. As little as you are one with the multiplicity of men, just so little is the one God one with the multiplicity of the Gods. This one God is the kind, the loving, the leading, the healing. To him all your love and worship is due. To him you should pray, you are one with him, he is near you, nearer than your soul. I, your soul, am your mother, who tenderly and frightfully surrounds you, your nourisher and corrupter; I prepare good things and poison for you. I am your intercessor with Abraxas. I teach you the arts that protect you from Abraxas. I stand between you and Abraxas the all-encompassing. I am your body, your shadow, your effectiveness in this world, your manifestation in the world of the Gods, your effulgence, your breath, your odor, your magical force. You should call me if you want to live with men, but the one God if you want to rise above the human world to the divine and eternal solitude of the star. 

1.“I am a star, wandering about with you.” —A citation from the Mithras Liturgy (Albrecht Dieterich, Eine Mithrasliturgie [Leipzig: B. G. Teubner, 1903], p. 8, line 5). Jung carved the continuation of this sentence on his stone at Bollingen. 

2. “You are Gods.” This is a citation from John 10:34: “The Jews answered him, saying, for a good work we stone thee not; but for blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man, makesth thyself God. Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are gods?” 

3. Sketch of Systema Munditotius; see Appendix A, p. 363 in the facsimile edition.




Who is Philemon?

The Philemon Foundation is named for a figure that appeared to Jung in a dream in 1913. In Memories, Dreams, Reflections, Jung recounted the dream in which this figure first appeared to him. Jung saw a sea-blue sky covered by brown clods of earth that appeared to be breaking apart. Out of the blue, he saw an old man with kingfisher wings and the horns of a bull flying across the sky, carrying a bunch of keys. After the dream, Jung painted the image, because he did not understand it. During this intense period, Jung was struck by the synchronicity of finding a dead kingfisher, a bird rarely seen around Zürich, in his garden by the lakeshore. Thereafter, Philemon played an important role in Jung’s fantasies. To Jung, he represented superior insight and functioned like a guru to him.

Partial accounts of this period may be found in the notes of his seminar given in 1925 on Analytical Psychology (prepared by Cary Baynes) and also in Aniela Jaffé’s biography, Memories, Dreams, Reflections, published posthumously in a heavily edited form. In these, Jung narrated some of his decisive experiences and spoke of a few of the fantasy figures that he had encountered. These fantasies were also from part of the narratives which he recorded in his now legendary Red Book. One of the most significant figures is Philemon.

In his memoirs, Jung reported that he would often converse with Philemon as he strolled in the garden of his lakeside home in Küsnacht, Switzerland. Speaking with Aniela Jaffé, his close friend and colleague, he recalled,

[Philemon] was simply a superior knowledge, and he taught me psychological objectivity and the actuality of the soul. He formulated and expressed everything which I had never thought.

Jung’s fantasy figure was based on the figure of Philemon who appeared in Ovid’s Metamorphoses and in Goethe’s Faust. In the Metamorphoses, Ovid narrates how Jupiter and Mercury went wandering disguised as mortals in the hill country of Phyrgia. Searching for somewhere to rest, they were barred from a thousand homes. However, one old couple, Philemon and Baucis, graciously invited these strangers into their humble cottage. They had been married in this cottage in their youth and had grown old together in it, contentedly accepting their poverty. During the meal they prepared for their guests, the couple noted how their flagon refilled itself automatically as soon as it was emptied. To honor their guests, they offered to kill their only goose. The goose took refuge with the two gods, who decreed that it should not be killed. Revealing themselves, the two divinities informed the ancient couple that those around them would be punished, but that they would be spared. With the gods they climbed to safety on a nearby mountain. Upon reaching the top, they could see that the country surrounding their cottage had been flooded, with only their cottage remaining, now transformed into a splendid temple with columns of marble and a roof of gold. To repay them for their hospitality and kindness, the gods granted the old couple any wish. Philemon and Baucis’s reply was in keeping with their deep humility and reverence. They wished to become priests and serve in this new shrine to the gods and to die at the same time as a testimony to their enduring love. And so it happened, and when they died the gods honored them further by transforming them into trees so that they might continue to live side by side in this way as they had done in their mortal lives.

In Faust 2, Act V, Goethe has Faust build a city on land reclaimed from the sea. In order to accomplish this task, Faust tells Mephistopheles that he wants Philemon and Baucis, who lived on this land, moved. To Faust’s ultimate horror, instead of doing so, Mephistopheles decides to burn their cottage with Philemon and Baucis inside. Goethe’s Faust made a tremendous impression on Jung and held a life-long significance for him. He felt personally implicated by the destruction of these humble and reverent figures and felt that it was his responsibility to atone for this crime and to prevent its repetition.3 Healing this Faustian split would become a central theme in Jung’s life work.

At his tower in Bollingen, Jung commemorated Philemon. Over the gate, he carved the inscription, “Philemonis Sacrum – Fausti Poenitentia” [Philemon’s Shrine – Faust’s Repentance]. In one of the rooms at Bollingen, he painted a huge mural of the winged Philemon, essentially reproducing the painting from the Red Book. In a letter to Paul Schmitt in 1942, Jung wrote: “I have taken over Faust as my heritage, and moreover as the advocate and avenger of Philemon and Baucis, who, unlike Faust the superman, are the hosts of the gods in a ruthless and godforsaken age.”4

1C. G. Jung & Aniela Jaffé, Memories, Dreams, Reflections. Translated by R. and C. Winston, London: Fontana, 1962/1983, p. 207.

2Protocols of Memories, Dreams, Reflections, Library of Congress, p. 23.

3C. G. Jung & Aniela Jaffé, Memories, Dreams, Reflections, p. 261.

4C. G. Jung, C. G. Jung Letters 1: 1906–1950. Edited by Gerhard Adler in collaboration with Aniela Jaffé, translated by R. F. C. Hull, London: Routledge, 1973, pp. 309–10.

Friday 28 April 2023

Hemingway



“He has the most 
profound bravery 
that it has ever been 
my privilege to see. 

He has had about 
8 times the normal 
allotment of responsibilities. 
It takes Courage.

He referred to the quality as "Guts." 
He weighs about 200 pounds, and 
he is even better than 
those photographs. 

The effect upon women is such that 
they want to go 
right out and get him and 
bring him Home, stuffed." 

— Dorothy Parker.

Narrator
By the time "A Farewell to Arms
topped the best-seller lists in 1929, 
colourful stories had already begun 
to circulate about 
Ernest Hemingway, 
many of them told 
by the writer himself. 
He'd once planned to be 
a professional boxer, he claimed. 
He'd fought in the Italian Army 
during The Great War, 
been wounded 7 separate times, and 
been awarded a chest-full of medals 
about which he said he was too modest to speak. 

And he'd nearly starved 
to death in Paris 
while learning to write. 
None of these stories was True. 

Edna O'Brien
He mythologised himself. 
Why do people mythologise
To woo other people and also 
to keep them at a distance. 
To feel inadequatebut to 
boast about being 
over-adequate. 

Katakis: 
Hemingway constructed 
His Myth to a large degree 
and he made the mistake 
that all myth-makers do -- 
He thought that he 
could control it. 

And there comes a time 
that you can't anymore. 
It's taken on a Life of its own. 
It became very exhausting 
to be Hemingway. 

The Hemingway that 
The Public thought. 

And let's face it, when he 
was in the public eye, 
he was always 
in the public eye and 
The People expected 
Hemingway to 
be Hemingway. 

[johnny gandelsman's "The garden of eden mix 3" playing] 
Narrator: 
His Art and the gaudy myths 
that grew up around him 
were already becoming confused 
in the public mind. 

At first, he himself was embarrassed 
by some of the tall tales when 
he saw them in print. 

But as his fame grew over the coming years, it became harder and harder to tell the real hemingway from the one he had created. 

Wolff
There's a Chinese proverb 
by the sage Zhuangzi 
and he has it this way -- 
He says, Good Fortune 
is as light as a feather 
and few are strong 
enough to carry it. 

When you think of the weight that his fame must have laid on him, even when he was young, and 
the anxiety that would produce 
of How can I live up to this? 
How can the next book be better? 
What is in me to make this real? 
It's very hard, I think, to be 
a public person like that. 

And so, I think 
every public person 
creates some kind 
of avatar, if you will, 
of themselves, some holograph 
of themselves to 
present publicly to save 
whatever is private in them. 

The Problem is that eventually 
Your Avatar will consume you. 

[fats waller's "Ain't misbehavin™ playing] 

Hemingway
We have a fine house here 
and the kids are all well. 
Also 4 raccoons, a possum, 
18 goldfish, 3 peacocks, 
and a yard with fig tree 
and a lime tree. 

Very fine the way 
Pauline has fixed it. 

We have been, and are, 
damned happy. 

I could stay here damned-near 
all the time and have a fine time 
watching the things grow and 
be happier than I understand.“

Thursday 27 April 2023

Mailer


“It is very important to me 
not to be 
sent to some mental institution. 

I’m a sane man. 

If this happens, for the rest of my life, 
My Work will be considered as 
The Work of a man with a disordered mind.


Mailer is a Bolinbroker, a born usurper. He will raise an army anywhere, live off the country as best he can, helped by a devoted underground, even assisted at brief moments by rival claimants like myself. Yet when all is said, none of this is the way to live. And it is not a way — at least it makes the way harder — to make a literature, which, no doubt quixotically, remains the interest of each of us. I suppose if it helps Hemingway to think of literature as a Golden Gloves Tournament with himself pounding Maupassant to the mat or fighting Tolstoy to a draw, then no doubt the fantasy has been of some use. But there is also evidence that the preoccupation with Power is a great waste of time. And Mailer has had the honesty to confess that his own competitiveness has wasted him as he worries about reviewers and bad publicity and the seemingly spiteful successes of other novelists…..”


Vidal VS Mailer — A Battle of Wit!
The Dick Cavett Show

The infamous feud between novelist Norman Mailer and writer Gore Vidal comes to a head in a battle of wit, sarcasm, and condescension with the audience and Janet Flanner (reluctantly) in the front row.

Who do you think "won" this clash?

Date aired - December 1st, 1971 - 
Gore Vidal, Norman Mailer, Janet Flanner

Dick Cavett has been nominated for eleven Emmy awards (the most recent in 2012 for the HBO special, Mel Brooks and Dick Cavett Together Again), and won three.  Spanning five decades, Dick Cavett’s television career has defined excellence in the interview format.  He started at ABC in 1968, and also enjoyed success on PBS, USA, and CNBC.
 
His most recent television successes were the September 2014 PBS special, Dick Cavett’s Watergate, followed April 2015 by Dick Cavett’s Vietnam. He has appeared in movies, tv specials, tv commercials, and several Broadway plays. He starred in an off-Broadway production ofHellman v. McCarthy in 2014 and reprised the role at Theatre 40 in LA February 2015.
 
Cavett has published four books beginning with Cavett (1974) and Eye on Cavett (1983), co-authored with Christopher Porterfield.  His two recent books -- Talk Show: Confrontations, Pointed Commentary, and Off-Screen Secrets (2010) and Brief Encounters: Conversations, Magic moments, and Assorted Hijinks(October 2014) are both collections of his online opinion column, written for The New York Times since 2007. Additionally, he has written for The New Yorker, TV Guide, Vanity Fair, and elsewhere.

#DickCavett #NormanMailer #GoreVidal #JanetFlanner #WomensLib #Feminism #Writers #NewYork #Awkward #Liberals #Conservatives #TheDickCavettShow


Why Norman Mailer Was So Infuriating
Dick Cavett | Big Think


Why Norman Mailer Was So Infuriating
New videos DAILY: https://bigth.ink/youtube
Join Big Think Edge for exclusive videos: https://bigth.ink/Edge
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
The famous clash between the author and Dick Cavett was triggered, in part, by Mailer’s misunderstanding of what an "interview" is supposed to be.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
DICK CAVETT:

Dick Cavett was the host of “The Dick Cavett Show” and the co-author of two books, “Cavett” (1974) and “Eye on Cavett” (1983). He has appeared on Broadway in “Otherwise Engaged,” “Into the Woods” and as narrator in “The Rocky Horror Show,” and has made guest appearances in movies and on TV shows including “Forrest Gump” and “The Simpsons.” He currently operates a blog for the “Opinionator” section of the New York Times.  Mr. Cavett lives in New York City and Montauk, N.Y.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
TRANSCRIPT:

Question : 
How would you prepare for your shows?

Dick Cavett : 
Oh, preparation, well, the Paar Tonight Show sort of set the model for how talk shows worked and they had what would be called the talent coordinator and that person's job was to meet with, if possible, the star or the author, or the historian, or the psychiatrist, or whoever was going to be the guest, and talk to them a little bit, or at least call them on the phone and talk a bit, and just get some stuff down on paper. 

Like, ask him about the fact that 
his daughter just won a prize, 
or he wants you to be sure and mention 
that the Hanseatic League, or -
- I'm sorry, I'm really reaching here -
- but so you've got something for you to look down at, 
and I finally learned that that's great to have, 
but not even that is necessary if things 
roll the way you're supposed to and you have an engaging person, conversation moves as conversation does in real life and you don't necessarily have to look down and read off a note.

Maybe that's why on a notorious show of mine where Norman Mailer and Gore Vidal tried to eviscerate each other, when 
Mailer got pissed, well, he got pissed before he came to the studio, but annoyed at me on the air and I at him, and the thing, I guess, that really got me was when he said, "Why don't you just read the next question off the question sheet?" 
And that's when I said, somewhat famously now, 
"Why don't you fold it five ways and 
put it where the moon don't shine?" 
This got one of the longest laughs in my career 
and certainly in television and it went on from there. 

But the idea that the show was, 
he knew to pick on the thing 
that would anger a host the most, 
that he can't think of anything to say 
and has to read questions off a sheet.

Question
What was Norman Mailer like?

Dick Cavett: 
Oh, Norman was many, oh, my God, that woman again. 
Has anything we've done been caught on tape? 
I've had that happen by the way. 

Oh, I like Norman Mailer and 
I loved his writing and long before I knew him 
and he was not gifted in the area of humor,
 thus on that notorious show of mine, Gore Vidal was able to get laughs off of him without -- but Gore wasn't picking on him, he would just say things like, but Norman was pissed, I think drunk is the word I'm looking for, and came on to get even with Gore for something he said Gore had written about him.

But at one point he said, 
"Gore, can't you just talk to me 
instead of talking to the audience? 
Can't you just talk to me?" 

And Gore, in that elegant way that he has, 
said almost the following, 
I'll probably get 80% on it, a wonderful sentence, 
that got applause, it was, approximately, 
"Of course, I'd be happy to talk to you, Norman, 
but we don't find ourselves 
in the friendly neighborhood bar, 
but by election in front of a studio audience 
and it would be dishonest of us 
to pretend otherwise." 

And this great, one of those things, got a big hand, which of course, stung Norman. But he was on a later show, people said, "I bet you never spoke to him again!" 
Yeah, I did, I saw him a number of times after that 
and we remained friends, if not buddies.


Norman Mailer on When He Head-butted Gore Vidal On The Show! | The Dick ...

Dick Cavett welcomes American novelist Norman Mailer to the show where he clarifies his previous arguments with Gore Vidal on the Dick Cavett Show and how he head-butted him when in the dressing rooms.

Date aired - September 28th 1972 - 
Norman Mailer and Valerie Harper

For clip licensing opportunities please visit https://www.globalimageworks.com/the-...

Dick Cavett has been nominated for eleven Emmy awards (the most recent in 2012 for the HBO special, Mel Brooks and Dick Cavett Together Again), and won three.  Spanning five decades, Dick Cavett’s television career has defined excellence in the interview format.  He started at ABC in 1968, and also enjoyed success on PBS, USA, and CNBC.
 
His most recent television successes were the September 2014 PBS special, Dick Cavett’s Watergate, followed April 2015 by Dick Cavett’s Vietnam. He has appeared in movies, tv specials, tv commercials, and several Broadway plays. He starred in an off-Broadway production ofHellman v. McCarthy in 2014 and reprised the role at Theatre 40 in LA February 2015.
 
Cavett has published four books beginning with Cavett (1974) and Eye on Cavett (1983), co-authored with Christopher Porterfield.  His two recent books -- Talk Show: Confrontations, Pointed Commentary, and Off-Screen Secrets (2010) and Brief Encounters: Conversations, Magic moments, and Assorted Hijinks(October 2014) are both collections of his online opinion column, written for The New York Times since 2007. Additionally, he has written for The New Yorker, TV Guide, Vanity Fair, and elsewhere.

#thedickcavettshow #NormanMailer #GoreVidal #ValerieHarper #DickCavett

Monday 24 April 2023

Free Range Kids


Lenore Skenazy : Free Range Kids

Everyone has an opinion 
when it comes 
to Questions of Parenting
Our Sunday newspapers 
seem to report on little else.
 
New York journalist, 
Lenore Skenazy 
tells how she was labelled 
America’s Worst Mom’ 
after she let her nine-year old son 
ride the subway home 
and how she fought back 
in the midst of a media maelstrom, 
by starting the movement for 
‘Free-range Kids’.

Tuesday 18 April 2023

Guardian Angels ~ Fr Ripperger

Guardian Angels ~ Fr Ripperger


John

The Gospel according to St John, 
read by Sir David Suchet


Mark 1:6
And John was clothed with camel's hair, and with a girdle of a skin about his loins; and he did eat locusts and wild honey;


Matthew 3:4
And the same John had his raiment of camel's hair, and a leathern girdle about his loins; and his meat was locusts and wild honey.


Exodus 10:14
And the locusts went up over all the land of Egypt, and rested in all the coasts of Egypt: very grievous were they; before them there were no such locusts as they, neither after them shall be such.


Proverbs 30:27
The locusts have no king, yet go they forth all of them by bands;





POE:
Snap, They’re on Your Tail!

SNAP:
Yeah, I see ‘em!

POE:
No, no, no, Snap, Snap!!


the TIE fighter shoots at Snap’s X-Wing, Snap screams

POE:
No!!!


Snap’s ship crashes and explodes

PILOT:
(over comlink) 
Alpha-3 is down. 
They’re on my tail! 
I can’t get…. (screams)

PILOT 2:
(over comlink) They’re everywhere!

PILOT 3:
(over comlink) Delta Leader’s hit!

PILOT 4:
(over comlink) Losing altitude!

PILOT 5:
(over comlink) General, what’s our next move?!

PILOT 6:
(over comlink) Poe, what now?!

POE:
My Friends…. I’m sorry, I thought we had a shot. 
But there’s just Too Many of Them.

LANDO:
(over comlink) 
But There are 
More of Us, Poe. 
There are More of Us.

POE:
Look at this. Look at this.


Laughing

FINN:
Lando, You did it. You did it!!!

POE:
Hit those underbelly cannons. 
Every one we knock out 
is A World Saved.

WEDGE:
Nice flying, Lando.

SOLDIER:
We have a ship down. 
We lost a Destroyer.

FEMALE FIRST ORDER OFFICER: 
Systems Not Responding.


referring to The Resistance

PRYDE:
Where did They get all these 
fighter craft? They have no Navy.

FRANTIS GRISS:
It’s not A Navy, sir, 
it’s just.... people.

ZORII:
(over comlink) So long, sky trash!

POE:
Who’s that flyer?

ZORII:
Take a guess, spice runner!

Babu Frik: 
Hey-hey!

POE:
Ha! Zorii! 
You made it!


But someone else has made it too. The fully rejuvenated Emperor steps out of the dust, free off the Omrin harness and more powerful than ever before

PALPATINE:
Look what you have made.


Disciples chanting

Ben grunts

PALPATINE:
As once I fell…. so falls The Last Skywalker.


he throws Ben into a chasm

Grunts

to his fleet as they are being attacked by The Resistance

PALPATINE:
Do not fear that feeble attack…. My Faithful. 
Nothing will stop the return of the Sith!!


he starts to attack the entire Resistance with Force lightning

POE:
R2, my systems are failing!


R2-D2 screeches

POE:
Does anyone copy??


Laughing evilly

Groans

Breathing deeply

a weakened Rey watches the Resistance being destroyed by Palpatine’s Force lightning

REY:
Be with Me. 
Be with Me. 
Be with Me.


Rey hears the voices of past Jedi

OBI-WAN:
These are your final steps, Rey. 
Rise and take them.

ANAKIN:
Rey.

AHSOKA:
Rey.

KANAN:
Rey.

ANAKIN:
Bring back The Balance, Rey, as I did.

LUMINARA:
In the night, find the light, Rey.

MACE:
You’re not alone, Rey.

YODA:
Alone, never have you been.

QUI-GON:
Every Jedi who ever lived lives in you.

ANAKIN:
The Force surrounds you, Rey.

AAYLA:
Let it guide you.

AHSOKA:
As it guided us.

MACE:
Feel The Force flowing through you, Rey.

ANAKIN:
Let it lift you.

ADI:
Rise, Rey.

QUI-GON:
We stand behind you, Rey.

OBI-WAN:
Rey.

YODA:
Rise in The Force.


Grunts

KANAN:
In the heart of a Jedi lies her strength.

OBI-WAN:
Rise.

QUI-GON:
Rise.

LUKE:
Rey, The Force Will Be with You, always.


Rey finally rises, stands before Palpatine and lights her saber

Breathing heavily

PALPATINE:

to Rey
Let your death be the final word…. in the story of the Rebellion.


as Rey is deflecting Palpatine’s Force lightning with her saber

POE:
I’m back on! This is our last chance. We got to hit those cannons now!


Rey grunting

PALPATINE:
You are nothing! A scavenger girl is no match for the power in me. I am all the Sith!


Grunts

REY:
And I…

REY:
…I’m all the Jedi.


Grunts

Rey uses Luke and Leia’s lightsabers

Rey straining

Groaning

Rey grunts

Screaming

Then, the sabers disintegrate Palpatine’s (Darth Sidious’) body, killing him

Rey grunts

Disciples screaming

Jannah gasps

C’AI:
Poe, the command ship!

POE:
Their fleet is stuck here! They’re toast! Come on!! Finn, you seeing this?!

ROSE:
Finn didn’t board the lander.

POE:
They’re still on that command ship?


Both yelping

Jannah straining

POE:
I see them. I’m going to get them.

WROBIE TYCE:
General, you won’t make it.

POE:
Trust me, I’m fast!

LANDO:
Not as fast as this ship. Hold on, Chewie! (laughs)


Chewie grunts

JANNAH:
Finn!!!


Both yell

FINN:
No, Rey.


Breathing shakily

Panting

Groans

Ben breathing heavily

Breath trembling

Breathing deeply

after Ben has used Force healing to resurrect Rey

REY:
(softly) Ben.

Caedroia











“I thought afterwards, "How come I saw this and a lot of other people didn't?"

And I've thought about it —

It's a combination of factors.

First, I grew up in Chicago and, therefore, just north of the Calumet Harbor and spent summers up in the sand dunes of Michigan, around on the other side of Lake Michigan.

My father took me and my sister out to collect little bits of Indian pottery.

I'd already... I'd already covered, at that point in 1980, five years of the Lebanese Civil War.

I was, at that point, covering John Paul ll.

I was the Rome Bureau Chief.

And listening to what he was saying about... because he had experienced the Holocaust at its epicenter and also other horrors.

And so all of those factors were very much alive in my mind when we went to see The Shining, which I just thought was going to be some kind of horror movie by this great moviemaker.

And all of those coming together along with the little key, the Calumet baking soda can, is why I just happened to tune to it as we were driving up out of that underground parking garage just off Leicester Square.

I first saw the movie in 1980 when it first came out and saw it probably two times.

I can say that I remembered the skier poster.

That is one thing that really stuck with me.

And the window.

The window in the office, that's another thing that really stuck with me.

I remember, you know, in the newspapers afterwards, people being disappointed.

And I remember people that I knew, yes, in dialogue afterwards, being disappointed that it was not more a horror film.

Well, no Kubrick film's really just a regular movie.

I understood that from, well, when I was 10 years old and I first saw 2001.

I walked away.

I thought, "This is a film that's supposed to make me think."

I had my first religious experience seeing the film 2001 : A Space Odyssey in 1968.

I was a smart kid and liked art, but I really did not like movies and thought that they were really a substandard art.

And, you know, films like My Fair Lady and Doctor Dolittle were out.

And it was a rather pathetic time in the '60s for films.

And my girlfriend, she pulled up and told me that she'd seen a movie the night before and she wanted to see it again.

So she took me to the theater, the Cinerama Dome, and I watched it.

And I had never in my life envisioned that a movie could do what this movie was doing.

And it was showing me things that I had never seen, and it was intellectually challenging.

And it was an artistic masterpiece in every way, from the soundtrack to the visuals to the story line.

And when the movie ended, I couldn't get out of my seat.

I was frozen in the seat, completely paralyzed by what I'd just witnessed.

And the usher actually had to come and get me out.

And I was the last person, me and her.

And I staggered out of the theater completely changed as a human being and decided at that moment that the only thing that I wanted to do for the rest of my life was to make films in one fashion or another.

And so I have done that.

So I owe Stanley Kubrick and his film 2001: A Space Odyssey everything for everything that I have become in my life, so...

I saw a number of Kubrick films before I had an academic interest in him.

And then I went to see The Shining in 1980.

And frankly, I didn't think that much of it.

I thought the other Kubrick films that I'd seen were far superior.

But as I thought about the film afterwards... and even when I wasn't thinking about it... there were things that bothered me about it.

It seemed as if I had missed something.

And so I went back to see it again.

And I began to see patterns and details that I hadn't noticed before.

And so I kept watching the film again and again and again.

And since I'm trained as an historian and my special expertise is in the history of Germany and n*zi Germany in particular, I became more and more convinced that there is, in this film, a deeply laid subtext that takes on The Holocaust.

I think it probably was the typewriter, which was a German brand, which might seem arbitrary, but by that time, I knew enough about Kubrick that most anything in his films can't be regarded as arbitrary, that anything... especially objects and colors and music and anything else, probably have some intentional as well as unintentional meaning to them.

And so that struck me.

Why a German typewriter?

And in connection with that, I began to see the number 42 appear in the film.

And for a German historian, if you put the number 42 and a German typewriter together, you get the Holocaust, because it was in 1942 that the n*zi made the decision to go ahead and exterminate all the Jews they could.

And they did so in a highly mechanical, industrial, and bureaucratic way.

And so the juxtaposition of the number 42 and the typewriter was really where it started for me in terms of the historical content of the film.

Of course "adler" in German means "eagle."

And eagle, of course, is a symbol of n*zi Germany.

It's also a symbol of the United States.

And Kubrick generally has recourse to eagles to symbolize state power.

Kubrick read Raul Hilberg's The Destruction of the European Jews.

And Hilberg's major theme in there is that he focuses on the apparatus of k*lling.

And he emphasizes how bureaucratic it was and how it was a matter of lists and typewriters.

Spielberg picked that up in Schindler's List, of course.

I mean, the film begins with typewriters and lists and ends with a list, of course.

And so that informs... and I had a chance to talk to Raul Hilberg.

He visited Albion College.

And he said that he and Kubrick corresponded about this.

And the fact that he read it then, in the 1970s, when there was a big wave of interest in h*tler and the Holocaust and the n*zi, I think...

I think just tells us that that typewriter, that German typewriter... which by the way, changes color in the course of the film, which typewriters don't generally do... is terribly, terribly important as a referent to that particular historical event.

I worked in a film archive for a decade, kind of like fast-forwarding through World w*r II ten times a day.

But, you know, like, when you see things over and over and again, their meanings change for you.

Like, when you see these... see, like, World w*r ll newsreels, like, after a while, you come to realize that it's all faked on film.

You are not seeing troops storming Normandy.

You're seeing troops storming a beach in Hollywood.

You know, like, you're not seeing a plane flying to Japan.

You're seeing a plane flying over, you know, New Mexico.

What you're really being shown is, like, staged heroism.

You know, like, you're seeing men moving with machines, but you're not seeing what they're talking about.

And I think that that's something that Kubrick plays on.

Like, he plays on your acceptance of visual infor... and also your ignorance of visual information.

Like he'll often, like, put little special clues that you see, like, in the corner.

Every scene, there's an impossibility, like the TV doesn't have a cord or even something as simple as, like, them... they, like... they bring too much luggage up.

They, like... Jack, you know, glances over at a pile of their luggage that they brought, and ifs about the size of a car.

You know, a lot of it is jokes.

Like, they're taking the tour.

They're crossing the street from the maze to go check out the garage.

Like, a car is just about to h*t them.

And then it cuts right before.

I had anticipated the film and had read the Stephen King novel before the film came out and found it a very appealing story.

And I had spent a lot of time at the Stanley Hotel in Estes Park, Colorado, which is where he was inspired to write the book The Shining.

And so I, you know... I knew a little bit of the background.

And when Kubrick's film came out, I was first in line to see it, of course.

And I was just really disappointed and walked out of the theater wondering what the hell I had just witnessed.

And, I... actually, my reverence for Stanley Kubrick diminished after that.

I was disappointed, but I still watched it every few years.

I couldn't understand why I was so attracted to watching a film that I actually didn't like.

And now in all these years later, I know why it is a great film.

It is a masterpiece, but not for the reasons that most people think.

We are dealing with a guy who has a 200 IQ.

I believe that when Stanley Kubrick finished with Barry Lyndon, he was bored.

He had conquered the filmmaking landscape.

He had succeeded in making masterpiece after masterpiece, and he was bored.

Barry Lyndon is a boring movie.

It is wonderfully sh*t.

It is beautifully costumed.

But it is a film made by a guy who is bored.

And I could see that.

And so I think Stanley retreated after Barry Lyndon.

And he began working on a new kind of film, a film that had never been made before, a film that was made by a bored genius who had thoroughly emptied the jug of everything that could be done in filmmaking.

And he was looking for the next thing.

And what he did was he began reading Subliminal Seduction and a number of other books which were about how advertisers were injecting... injecting images, subliminal images, into advertising to sell products more.

Suggestible trends.

You know, there'll be an ad for Gilbey's Gin, and inside, the ice cubes will be various sex organs and things to add a subliminal appeal to the ad.

Kubrick went to these advertisers, and he asked them what their methods were.

And then he took those methods and he applied them to The Shining.

Inside The Shining are hundreds of subliminal images and sh*t line-ups.

And what these images are telling is an extremely disturbing story about sexuality.

And the subtext of the story, besides the other subtexts of the story, is a story of haunted phantoms and demons who are sexually attracted to humans and are feeding off of them.

You'd have to be able to be a complete fanatic like I am in order to find all this, but, you know, I'll give you my favorite.

I'm only gonna give you one, but I'll give you my favorite.

When Jack meets Stewart Ullman in the office at the very beginning of the movie and he reaches over to shake Jack Nicholson's hand... and so step through that scene frame by frame.

And the minute, the moment, the frame that he and Jack Nicholson touch hands and right after the line that Barry Nelson says, which is, "Nice to see you," you can see that there's a paper... a paper tray on the desk.

And as soon as they touch hands, the paper tray turns into a very large straight-on hard-on coming out of Barry nelson.

Yeah, it's hilarious.

It's a joke... a very serious joke... but a joke by Stanley.

And there's many of these in the film.

And very disturbing, some of them.

And this will all be in my film, Kubrick the Magician.

I'll give you one more.

This one's harder to find, okay?

And you have to know what Stanley Kubrick looked like during the making of The Shining to know this one.

But if you go to the opening credits and you pan the frame... you... you go through the frames, right after it says "Directed by Stanley Kubrick," as soon as his name passes off the frame, stop and you will see that the clouds have Stanley Kubrick airbrushed into them, his face... with the beard and the wild hair and the whole thing.

I know this one's a little harder to find.

And I will have to...

I will have to Photoshop this one to show people it, but there is definitely the photograph of Stanley Kubrick in one frame airbrushed into the clouds.

In most films, a dissolve is used to indicate a long passage of time between two scenes.

But in The Shining, the dissolves go on for so long that they create a superimposition, where different scenes seem to be interacting with each other.

For example, you have the exterior image... a tracking sh*t of the lobby of the camera moving along the western wall south towards the entrance.

And you see a janitor mopping the floor, but it looks like he's... it looks like a he's a giant, mopping, like, clearing the forest because he's mopping, like, a vacant area in the forest.

And then the... then the ladder lines up... lines up with the pyramid form of the exterior of the hotel, which, in the exterior set, disappears.

Like, we don't see... we only see that in the Timberline exteriors.

But the England movie set exteriors of the hotel, like, the pyramid is missing, and it seems as if the hotel then takes both sides of the Timberline Hotel and then kind of, like, makes a composite of it.

So it's... you know, it's a perceptual shift of making people look like giants, also making the hotel look larger or smaller than it is.

I mean, these things kind of litter the movie.

But then the sh*t goes on.

We see a... we see a janitor pushing a folded-up bed on wheels.

And then he's followed by another... he's followed by another guy, who's carrying, like, one... like, one coffee table?

And then another... like, another guy is carrying one chair.

Like, where are these guys going with, like, these light loads, you know?

Then we see Jack sitting on a chair, eating lunch.

And the manager and his assistant crosses paths with two women who... and just as he's in the corner of the screen... you just see it for a second.

You see one of the women is wearing, like, a 13, a number 13 jersey?

Can you hear that?

My boy, yelling?

Hold on one second.

I'm gonna see if I can...

I can see if I can calm him down.

You know, so, like, he's like, leaning back and eating a sandwich.

And he's got, you know, a magazine in his lap.

And as he stands up to greet them, he, like, throws it down.

And if you look at" look at... look at it, you know, close up, it's an actual Playgirl magazine.

Yeah, a Playgirl magazine in the lobby of a hotel right in front of his boss, like on his first day at work.

Yeah.

Like, the cover is like, people getting ready for New Year's.

There's an article about incest.

At the beginning of the film, Danny's been physically abused.

But there's a suggestion that he's been sexually abused as well.

You know, so like, just in that one... one sh*t, there's all these, like, you know, complex things going on in the background, like things that are choreographed to match up exactly.

Like, we see a guy... we see a guy, carrying a... entering the room, carrying a rug.

And by the time the scene is just ending, we see him walking up the stairs.

Like, he's crossed the entire place, you know, timed exactly.

I don't even...

Yeah.

When Ullman is leading the Torrances out of the elevator and into the Colorado Lounge for the first time, there's a pile of suitcases.

And in the dissolve into that scene, the scene before, a group of tourists are standing in the lobby.

And those tourists dissolve into the suitcases.

Now, as an historian of the Holocaust, I find that very, very striking and certainly not accidental

'cause he's using those sort of cross-dissolves.

Now, that could be, along with the ladder, where he's trying to make substantive connections as well as formal ones.

Oh, the window in Ullman's office, it is absolutely beautiful.

The casual viewer isn't going to see so many things in Kubrick's films, although I think they may register unconsciously.

You know, but they're not going to, you know, perceive perhaps these things because as I've said, he presents them as being real.

You know, it's realism.

And it's not your typical horror... you don't have a horror film except for this one section at the end, right where Wendy walks in and the lobby is blue and you've got the cobwebs all around.

And it's almost like a Saturday morning kind of horror film suddenly there for a second.

And you kind of go.

"Ooh, what is this with the skeletons and the cobwebs?"

And it's kind of cheesy.

But then, after that, following that, you've got her going down the red hallway, which... on the big screen, that's petrifying.

So I think the kind of cheesiness before it helps set up that red hallway.

So anyway, what was I saying?

Right, the windows.

So you got... Jack has entered.

And you can see... you are...

Kubrick shows you.

But he shows you this lobby, and you get to see... as Jack moves across the lobby, you see the elevator beyond.

And you see beyond that, a hallway.

You don't see yet how far back it goes, you know, the other things back there, but you have an impression that this place is towards the middle of the hotel.

You just have that impression that it's towards the middle of the hotel.

And you go from the lobby into the general manager's office and then into Ullman's office, and there's this window.

And the window's a powerful window.

I mean, the light coming through there is glaring.

It's like a character in itself.

It takes over.

And you've got these tendril-y, sinister kind of trees that are outside the window.

And you've got... it's just such a forceful presence, this light that comes over everything.

And, you know...

And there's something wrong with it.

There's something wrong with it, and I think it registers as something wrong.

This is an impossible window.

It's not... it is impossible.

It is physically impossible.

It cannot be there.

It should not be there.

There's no place in the hotel for this window to exist.

It's only toward... finally, towards the end of the film, that you have the realization that there are several hallways in succession behind the office.

You see it when Wendy, when she's later down there and she sees Dick Hallorann's body after he's been k*lled.

You have her behind... in that hallway behind the office.

So really, now, what can I tell you about the maps?

No, I did not sit down with graph paper.

I did not even begin to attempt to do them to scale.

Let me see.

I can't say which room I started off with.

I don't remember.

I just went through and decided I was going to do... try to do as much as I could, feeling that...

I felt, eventually, that there were places that I could plot out, such as where the girls were k*lled.

I was not absolutely sure at that point, when I started out doing the maps, where the girls were k*lled.

But I felt that it was somewhere back around the area where they lived.

Suite number, what?

They lived at suite number 3.

When Jack is sitting, typing at his typewriter, and Wendy comes in and interrupts him while he's working... and in one sh*t of Jack...

You get a lot written today?

Sitting at the typewriter, a one sh*t, you look back behind him.

And of course, you can see very clearly

'cause Kubrick was the master of depth of field.

He kept everything in focus so he would have lots of space in which to puts things that he wanted you to notice.

And in the first sh*t, behind Jack sitting at his typewriter, back against a wall, behind him probably 10 or 12 or 15 feet is a chair.

And then there's a switch to a one-sh*t of Wendy saying something.

Hey, the weather forecast said it's gonna snow tonight.

And then the camera switches back to Jack, and the chair is gone.

What do you want me to do about it?

And my students and I always have fun with that, saying, "Well, continuity error?"

Could be.

Or it's not, and the answer, if it's not... or if it was originally and then Kubrick saw it and decided to keep it, is that he's parodying honor films in order to remind you that this isn't just a horror film.

And there's another one in The Shining that's, I think, less well-noticed.

And I think it's even more clearly substantive.

When Danny has his first vision of the elevator gushing blood and the camera is tracking toward him, past the open door of his bedroom and toward the hall and the bathroom, the open bathroom door across the hall... and his bedroom door, as you would expect a kid's door, has lots of cartoon characters on it And, the one who is most apparent, because it's right at the edge of the door and it's the largest one that you can see and it's the last one you can see as the camera moves past it, is one of the Seven Dwarves.

And it happens to be Dopey, okay?

Subsequently, after Danny has passed out, Wendy and the pediatrician leave Danny's room.

And as they do, they, of course, go out his door.

And you again see the door, the open door with all the cartoon characters on it, and Dopey isn't there.

Now, again continuity error?

I don't think so.

I think what Kubrick is saying is that before, Danny had no idea about the world, and now he knows.

He is no longer a dope about things.

He has been enlightened.

Anything you say, Lloyd.

Anything you say.

The the advocaat is spilled.

There's the accident.

Kubrick is setting it up as where they come around in a circle, 'cause I feel like that's what the camera does.

I feel like the camera brings us around in a circle so that we're coming back.

The bathroom seems to be overlaying the Gold Room and... so that the advocaat situation in the bathroom is occurring about in the same area that it did in the Gold Room.

They use the camera to create an emotional architecture in your mind but at the same time, showing you that it's false.

The set is complete... so completely plastic that its contradictions pile up in your subconscious.

Hallorann is showing... showing Wendy, you know, the place where she will, you know, basically, entrap Jack... entrap him both physically, but also, like, that will be the last straw for him, last straw for the management of the hotel.

It's in the store room that he finally is like, "Okay. Now I'm gonna do it."

And, you know, the opening of that door is the famous, like, only thing that's supernatural happens in the movie that can't be explained any other way.

Yeah.

But except that it can be explained another way, in that Danny lets him out.

I do have this idea that Danny is a lot more consciously m*rder his father than the narrative lets on.

I don't know. It's weird.

Like, you notice how, like, Wendy's walking backwards when she's having that confrontation with Jack in the lounge, you know.

And she's being drawn up to the hexagonal hallway room.

And you see Danny shining at the beginning of that.

He's in his room, and there's, like, lights flickering in his eyes.

Like, is Danny drawing... you know, drawing his mother up the stairs so that she can, you know, sacrifice Jack on top of that, you know, weird pyramid?

When I had a chance... when I was doing a story out in Denver, we went up to Estes Park.

It was in the off-season.

Went into the Stanley Hotel, and I asked to see the manager.

And he came out, and we were just having lunch with him.

And I said, "Can we talk to you? I write about The Shining."

He said, "Really?"

This fellow told me that he got a phone call from Stanley Kubrick, who said, "I think I want to make a movie about The Shining."

And then he would keep this fellow on the phone for a long time.

He said, "We had many long, long conversations in which he picked my brain about everything."

And at that point, he said, "Kubrick was talking about maybe coming here to make the movie here," which I expect, at that point, that fellow liked the idea of, so it would make his hotel famous.

And Kubrick said, "I'd like to send out a research team."

And so he then sent out... the man said it was something like two or three people who came out here and stayed here for two or three months, taking photographs everywhere.

And they spent a lot of time also down in Denver in the Colorado state archives, finding out, as I would now expect, the full history of Colorado, which... the flag of which plays a part.

And the gold rush, the Colorado Gold Rush was also a very big event.

And there's all... there's still a lot of American Indian/white people tension in Colorado with Navajos and Arapahos just to the south.

This research team found out absolutely everything about Colorado, about Estes Park, about the Stanley Hotel, about its entire history, took photographs all over the place.

Three months was the impression that I have of what he said about how this research team gathered absolutely everything.

Kubrick unearthed an enormous amount about the real history of Colorado, where this takes place, because what he has done is found a way to dig into all of the patterns of our civilization, our times and our cultures, and the things that we don't want to look at.

And this movie is very much also about denial of the genocides that we committed... we white folk from Europe... committed here and not that... not that white folks are the only people who do genocide.

All humans do, as Kubrick makes clear in this movie.

He would research everything and the full history and nature of everything you're gonna see in the movie on the screen and then boil it down and boil it down until he got the universal human and global patterns that make it so real.

White man's burden, Lloyd, my man.

White man's burden.

I like you, Lloyd.

I always liked you.

You were always the best of 'em.

The best goddamned bartender from Timbuktu to Portland, Maine, or Portland, Oregon, for that matter.

Thank you for saying so.

What does it mean?

Jack saying, "You always were the best of 'em."

Starting in Timbuktu?

Jack the schoolteacher was never in Timbuktu, but Jack the universal weak male hired by armies to go commit atrocities has always been there.

Now, of course, the word "Portland" is neat because it means where we landed or where the British or the Europeans landed.

And Portland, Maine... Oregon is where they may have taken off from to go further west.

Kubrick is thinking about the implications of everything that exists.



You know, the power of the genie is in its confinement, as the great American poet Richard Wilbur said.

Boiling it down, you know, 10,000 years in a little lamp, you got to get your act together.

But that's the essence of great art.

It's like a dream.

It's boiled everything down to an emblematic symbol that's got all of life in it.

Now, if you'll allow me to make a little bit of a link here.

As I've thinking of this more in recent years, what we now understand to be the nature of what dreams are, I mean, it seems to be, the general theory is, that it's a way for the brain to boil down all of the previous experiences and then add in that day's experiences as well to see what kind of overall universal patterns there are to be found, so that you can be aware of what the patterns are out there, so that your subconscious will be all the more ready to react suddenly when you see something dangerous happen or something important happen that may lead you to a mate or to some food or away from danger.

And therefore, the way Kubrick made movies was not unlike the way, according to these current theories, our brains create memories and, for that matter, dreams.

That's the ultimate shining that Kubrick does.

He is like a mega brain for the planet who is boiling down with all of this extensive research, all of these patterns of our world and then giving them back to us in a dream of a movie... because movies are like a dream... and that's related to why I think there's a lot of evidence that what Kubrick also gave us in The Shining is a movie about the past.

Not just any past.

The past.

I mean past-ness.

It's a movie about how the past impinges.

That's what ghosts are.

That's what those skitter-y voices in the opening sh*t that are following are about.

There's two phrases from T.S. Eliot that I often think of when I'm thinking about The Shining.

One of them is "The night"...

I think they're both from T.S. Eliot...

"The nightmare of history... how can we awake from the nightmare of history?"

And the other is his phrase... T.S. Eliot's phrase...

"History has many cunning passages."

And I think both of those phrases are directly apt for The Shining, in which we see many cunning passages in the maze and in the hotel itself and in which the past becomes a nightmare, and in which Kubrick shows us how you escape from the nightmare of the past by retracing your steps, as Danny does in that last line, which means acknowledging what happened and learning about the past and then getting out, only if you are going to be able to shine and see what the patterns are so you know to get away from them and avoid them and go for the good things.

I mean, The Shining is his movie about how families break down, whether they are an individual family or the larger societal family that tries to break up individual families.

And his hat movie, Eyes Wide Shut is the opposite.

It's about a family sorely tried, Bill Hartford and his wife and child, that survives all the horrible temptations that are in our DNA.

This is our famous hedge maze.

It's a lot of fun.

But I wouldn't want to go in there unless I had an hour to spare to find my way out.

I did not look at it again for a number of years until it came out in rental.

And then I picked it up a couple of times.

And, what, you had three days in order to watch a rental?

And so, I can remember watching it over and over again during those three days and really taking a good look at it then.

And I was able to think "Oh, yes, this is what I remember.

This is what I thought I saw," and then catching more things.

But it wasn't, of course, until DVD came out that I was really able to sit down and take a good look at it as far as just running through it over and over and over again.

Kubrick presents these things where it's, you know, real... you know, it's realistic.

You're not supposed to see what's actually going on.

You've got Danny.

He's in the game room. He turns around.

We're supposed to be focused on the two girls there.

And than you... I saw... over on the left, I see this skiing poster.

And the thing is that you already have Jack.

He's already asked about skiing.

But why isn't... you know, "What about skiing?

Isn't the skiing good here in the hotel?"

And he's already given the story of why it isn't good, why they can't do that.

But you got the skiing poster.

And my eye is drawn to it.

And I realize that's not a skier.

That's a... that's a minotaur.

It just leaped out at me.

And so that was something that I was able to look at later on VHS and say, "Yes, I had actually seen a minotaur there," where the upper body, you've got this really, you know, overblown physique, very physical physique.

And then you've got the suggestion... you have a suggestion of a skiing pole there, but it's not really there.

It's just a suggestion of one.

And the lower body is positioned, the way the legs are, it's like a minotaur, the build is.

And you've actually got the tail there.

And so it is a minotaur.

And this is in... on the opposite side of the door you have a cowboy on a bucking bronco, so... and so you got a kind of echo there, where you got the minotaur on one side, the bull man, and on the other side, you got the cowboy, the man on the bucking bronco.

And this is just following the scene where they...

Ullman has been taking Jack and Wendy through the Colorado Lounge, showing off the Colorado Lounge.

And they go into the hall behind the Colorado Lounge.

And what's there, but on the wall, there is a painting of an American Indian with a buffalo headdress on.

And at that point, Ullman is discussing with Wendy who has stayed there at the hotel.

Royalty, the best people, stars have stayed there.

Royalty?

All the best people.

You have "monarch" on the bottom, which, you know, keys in with royalty.

And you also have this whole idea of the stars.

And the minotaur's name is, what, Asterius?

His name is Asterius, which means "starry."

So you know, you got several things there to do with mythology that fit in.

It's very exciting to me.

That was the... you know, that's the kind of leap-up-end-down moment where you go, "Oh, wow, look at what Kubrick has there."

Yeah, I mean the minotaur lives at the heart of the labyrinth.

He's a part of the labyrinth.

The labyrinth, at least in the myth... you know, in this particular myth... was built for the minotaur.

The hotel is... you know, it is the labyrinth.

And Jack is the minotaur.

You have scenes with him where he... such as in... what is it?

The Thursday scene.

The snowfall has started.

You have Wendy and Danny outside playing.

And Jack is inside the Colorado Lounge, and he's looking out at them.

His head is tilted down, and his eyes are somewhat... his eyes are elevated.

They're pointing up.

And his eyebrows are drawn up.

But he has this expression on his face that he gets progressively throughout the film that is very bull-like.

It has a very minotaur-like expression.

It's the same kind of expression that Kubrick pulls out in other films, such as it was on Private Pyle's face in the berserker scene in the bathroom in Full Metal Jacket.

So it's, you know, not specific to this film.

There's more minotaur imagery and labyrinth imagery.

There's the Gold Room.

In front of the Gold Room, you have the "Unwinding Hours" sign.

And that plays in with the labyrinth, where you have...



Theseus enters into the labyrinth, and he has the thread with him that he ties at the beginning that, you know, assists him in going through the labyrinth, where he can find his way back out.

And so I see the "Unwinding Hours" sign as having to do with that thread.

For a while there, I was into baseball.

And I get very excited with baseball when I'm into baseball.

You know, I can be by myself, and I will be leaping up and down.

And Kubrick is like that for me, where all I have to do is see the minotaur poster there, and I go, "Oh, my goodness. Look at this!"

Because you're not supposed to see the minotaur.

Danny is shown riding his big wheel through the hotel three times.



The first ride, I think, is about realism.

That's Danny is a...

Danny is doing a loop around the lounge set.

You know, he goes through the service hallway and then he goes through the lounge and then he goes back into the service hallway.

And, you know, when you first see the movie, you're like, "He's just wandering around.

It's crazy, it's just"...

But it... no, it's very... it's just a very simple loop.

He does it once.

But that gives you an idea of where... of What that place is.

I mean, you know, all right, you understand that that set is real.

You know, like, it's a continuous sh*t.

There are no tricks.

In the second ride, in the hexagonal hallway, there are a lot of... there are more tricks.

Like, he doesn't do a loop.

He does kind of like a key-shaped... you know, or a p-shaped loop around this hallway.

And you see The Realism of the connection to the lounge set.

And... but you also see the fakery of the fake elevators.

And you see... for just one second, you see the big stained glass windows out of the corner, in the corner of the frame right before he takes a turn around the elevator.



Like, that's incredible because, like, that connects that whole hallway to the giant Colorado Lounge set.

I mean, that's just for one second.

They didn't have to do that, you know?

But it's also... you know, it's a metaphor because he's also elevated.

He's one level up from where he was before.

Like, he starts in the same place, just one floor up, you know, in the northeast corner of the set.

So now he's in the northeast corner and one level up.

And if you take it as a metaphor of, like, going from a mundane reality to up into your head to more of a fantastical reality...

The third one is even stranger, 'cause he starts off in the service unit.

He starts off in the same, you know, northeast corner of the lobby hall, of the lobby service hallway.

And then he takes a turn, and suddenly he's upstairs in the area outside their apartment So, like, it's a kind of a combination of the first two, where like he's down low and then he's up high.

And then he takes a turn, and he's suddenly... he's in that that yellow, yellow and blue wallpaper.

Let's say that's in the service hallway area.

He's, you know, right outside his parents' bedroom, so there's this connection between him going on these big wheel rides and dreaming.

Like, he's near his bedroom.

He's near... like, you see his parents are working downstairs, but he's upstairs.

You know, like, you see his mom on the telephone, and then he's flying.



He goes above her to the bedroom, which is above where she's working, just as the hexagonal hallway is above where his dad is working.

So these big wheel rides become like a visionary way of Danny to explore his parents' headspace.

You know, like, room 237 is his, like... that's his father's fantasy chamber where, like, he gets it on with the witches.

And the twins are like his mother's fantasy... fantasy headspace where, like, they're these double blue women who want to play with Danny forever and ever.

We're all gonna have a real good time.

My interpretation of The Shining is that there's many levels to this film.

This is like three-dimensional chess.

And he's trying to tell us several stories that appear to be separate but actually are not.

And he's doing this both through the overt script that he wrote.

He's telling it through tricks of the trade, the subliminal imagery and these constant retakes, giving him odd angles and things.

And he's also telling you through the changes that he made to the Stephen King novel.

So if you watch those three things, you begin to understand this deeper story.