Tuesday 29 August 2023

Draw





Will Tenneray and Abe Cross are 
two famous gunfighters who are 
getting old and need Money. 
Cross tried his luck at gold prospecting but failed. 
Tenneray works at the local saloon where he 
capitalises on his past fame to 
"sucker fools into 
buying drinks". 
The Town expects them to 
become enemies and kill each 
other in A Gunfight but the two 
aging gunfighters start 
liking one another. 
Desperate for Money, 
Tenneray suggests to Cross to 
put on a show for the townsfolk 
and fight in an arena for money. 
The proceeds from 
the ticket-sales would 
go to The Winner of 
The Gunfight. 

Both men like the idea of a paid 
show but hate the possibility of 
one of them killing The Other.




Thursday 24 August 2023

The Horror




The Horror….

The Horror….





horror (n.)
early 14c., "feeling of disgust;" late 14c., "emotion of horror or dread," also "thing which excites horror," from Old French horror (12c., Modern French horreur) and directly from Latin horror "dread, veneration, religious awe," a figurative use, literally "a shaking, trembling (as with cold or fear), shudder, chill," from horrere "to bristle with fear, shudder," from PIE root *ghers- "to bristle" (source also of Sanskrit harsate "bristles," Avestan zarshayamna- "ruffling one's feathers," Latin eris (genitive) "hedgehog," Welsh garw "rough").

Also formerly in English "a shivering," especially as a symptom of disease or in reaction to a sour or bitter taste (1530s); "erection of the hairs on the skin" (1650s); "a ruffling as of water surface" (1630s). As a genre in film, 1934. Chamber of horrors originally (1849) was a gallery of notorious criminals in Madame Tussaud's wax exhibition. Other noun forms are horribility (14c., now rare or disused), horribleness (late 14c.), horridity (1620s), horridness (1610s).
also from early 14c.

Entries linking to horror

abhor (v.)
c. 1400, "to loathe, regard with repugnance, dislike intensely," literally "to shrink back with horror or dread," from Latin abhorrere "shrink back from, have an aversion for, shudder at," from ab "off, away from" (see ab-) + horrere "tremble at, shudder," literally "to bristle, be shaggy" (from PIE *ghers- "start out, stand out, rise to a point, bristle;" see horror).

Formerly also "fill (someone) with horror or loathing" (16c.). In Latin it was less intense: "be remote from, vary from, differ from, be out of harmony with." Related: Abhorred; abhorring.

arugula (n.)
edible cruciform plant (Eruca sativa) used originally in the Mediterranean region as a salad, 1967, the American English and Australian form of the name (via Italian immigrants), from a dialectal variant of Italian ruchetta, a diminutive form of ruca-, from Latin eruca, a name of some cabbage-like plant (from PIE *gher(s)-uka-, from root *ghers- "to bristle;" for which see horror).

In England, the usual name is rocket (see rocket (n.1)), which is from Italian ruchetta via French roquette. It also sometimes is called hedge mustard.
Chersonese
gorse
hair
hirsute
horrendous
horrible
horrid
horrific
horrify
horripilation
rocket
urchin
See all related words (14) >
Trends of horror

adapted from books.google.com/ngrams/. Ngrams are probably unreliable.
Others are reading

shiver (v.1)
tremble or quiver, shake suddenly," especially with cold, c. 1400, an alteration of chiveren "to shiver" (with cold, chills, horror...Related: Shivered; shivering.We shiver with cold or a sensation like that of cold ; we quake with fear ; we shudder with horror...
Moloch 
from Hebrew molekh, from melekh "king," altered by the Jews with the vowel points from basheth "shame" to express their horror...
curdle (v.)
To curdle (one's) blood, in the figurative sense of "inspire horror" is from c. 1600....
shocking (adj.)
It is attested by 1704 in a stronger sense of "causing a jolt of indignation, horror, etc."...
hideous (adj.)
.; Modern French hideux), from hisda "horror, fear," perhaps of Germanic origin....
electrocution (n.)
preliminary arrangements: the shaving of the head, the cutting of the clothing, the strapping in a chair, add much to the horror...
gruesome (adj.)
1560s, with -some (1) + grue, from Middle English gruen "feel horror, shudder" (c. 1300); not recorded in Old English or...
barmaid (n.)
woman who tends a bar," 1650s, from bar (n.2) + maid.The one employment from which Americans turn their faces in righteous horror...
abomination (n.)
., "feeling of disgust, hatred, loathing," from Old French abominacion "abomination, horror, repugnance, disgust" (13c.)...
phobia (n.)
"irrational fear, horror, or aversion; fear of an imaginary evil or undue fear of a real one," 1786, perhaps based on a similar...
Open in app
Advertisement

Trending words

1. hangover
2. queen
3. quean
4. verve
5. travesty
6. king
7. leman
8. economy
9. magma
10. brother
Dictionary entries near horror

horribly
horrid
horrific
horrify
horripilation
horror
hors d'oeuvre
hors de combat
horse
horse sense
horseback
updated on September 06, 2015
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
Etymonline - Online Etymology Dictionary
Full List of Sources
Links
iOS App
Android App
Introduction and Explanation
Who Did This
Follow on Facebook
Donate with PayPal
Ye Olde Swag Shoppe
Support on Patreon
© 2001-2023 Douglas Harper | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
English (English) 

Wednesday 23 August 2023

In Search of The Rainbow’s End







“All of a sudden, Heather snapped into gear and I saw a forceful side to her I had never seen before. We had known each other about a year, during which time she played a major part in helping my understanding of Bambs’s condition. Having seen her own Mother consumed by similar problems, her knowledge of Psychology and Family Dynamics often made me feel very uncomfortable

Although outwardly soft and gentle, her quiet conviction that Bambs might just drown in a sea of Other People’s beliefs about her, including my own, was definitely not what I wanted to hear. She could also see me struggling with Thoughts of pulling Bambs back into the comparative safety of my own somewhat water-logged environment. 

In my endeavours 
to sort all this out
both Women 
had become invisible.”





“Leading psychologist Alice Miller speaks about the need for all children to have an adult witness to the hurts or injustices of their lives. Without this support, the unbearable loneliness compels us to put a lid on our feelings, repress all memory of the trauma and idealise those who inflicted the abuse; like all children, we need to look up to and have the respect of those who care for us. Thus dissociated from the original cause, feelings of anger, helplessness and despair eventually find expression in destructive acts against others (Dr Miller cites criminal behaviour, mass murder and rape as typical), or against themselves (alcoholism, drug addiction, prostitution, psychic disorders and suicide).

She then goes on to say that if mistreated children are not to become like this, it is essential that at least once in their life they come in contact with someone who knows, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that the environment - not the helpless child - is at fault.

'In this regard,' she said, 'knowledge or ignorance on the part of Society can be instrumental in either saving or destroying a life.’



“Over the months, there had been a number of occasions when I seriously considered shelving the whole book idea; it was proving far too painful at times. But after the somewhat unusual encouragement that concluded the last chapter, I no longer had any real choice. I had to continue. It had also occurred to me that either Betty or Herbie could be the real source of such a message, but it didn't really matter : living or dead, I was being given genuine encouragement by people who cared.

Well, the book, like many aspects of this strange journey, took a long time to find its present form and the light of day. I now stand as a very different person to the one who walked out of Betty's house towards a murder trial. And like the book, which has existed in numerous forms, I have gone through many transitions since then. I had also reached a point in the journey where I was to discover there were many different tunnels to explore, all of them in my own psyche; tunnels that interlinked in strange and diverse ways.

But like Theseus with Ariadne's 'magical thread', there was still only one route to follow : the one which led to the centre of the Labyrinth, to the monster that lurked therein; to my own Shadow, as Carl Jung described it. I didn't know, then, where I was heading, but something in me knew that if I didn't go in to meet that unknown creature, 'It' would eventually come out to find me.

This was brought to the fore, I realise now, by my impending confrontation with Jeremy at his trial - not that I was required to speak to him, but I still had no wish to see him.

I was afraid of the feelings it might bring up in me. I was still very much in denial on very many levels: denial about the deaths and the brutal reality of them, but also of my own murderous feelings, especially towards Jeremy. As 'a nice guy' this did not sit too well with my own self-image: he, Jeremy, did things like that, not me!


In Chetwynd's Dictionary of Symbols, The Shadow, which is the opposite unconscious counterpart of the Ego (what I have described as 'my own self-image), is defined as the 'modern psychological name for an ancient symbolic figure, the embodiment and epitome of all that is most vicious, brutal and vile in the human character. It is also made up of all those parts of ourselves that we would much rather not know about, or indeed want others to see; all those parts that cause us to feel embarrassed, uncomfortable or ashamed. In that sense The Shadow is not necessarily bad. It only gets in the way if it is ignored.

For example, the very serious person, who has never been allowed to have fun or be reckless, may have a very joyful Shadow; one which, if ignored, might come out as The Trickster another Shadow character) and tip that person into situations where they suffer an attack of uncontrollable giggles when absolute seriousness is required. That is The Shadow at work. Another symbolic example might be the fairy-tale queen who is no longer considered the most beautiful and becomes, instead, the witch. Snow White comes to mind as a perfect metaphor for the drama between Bambs and her adoptive mother. They seemed to be a direct manifestation of each other's Shadow.

In its more dangerous aspect, the Shadow might become manifest in the gentle person who has never been allowed to show their anger, has been shamed by any display of it; the person who, pushed or prodded once too often, loses control and explodes with terrible consequences. Prisons, I have since discovered, are full of them. That was the danger with me.

In Jeremy's case, there was something else in action, something slightly different, connected to morality - or rather, to its negative counterpart - as well as anger. His justifiable hatred of moralistic chastisement, amongst other things, had gone so deep it would seem to have invoked the very embodiment of Darkness-Itself. From his perspective, The Family would represent to him everything alien to his survival; his own Shadow.

Monday 21 August 2023

Younglings





youngster (n.)
1580s, from young (adj.) + -ster. Earlier was youngling, from Old English geongling.
also from 1580s
Advertisement

Entries linking to youngster

-ster 
Old English -istre, from Proto-Germanic *-istrijon, feminine agent suffix used as the equivalent of masculine -ere (see -er (1)). Also used in Middle English to form nouns of action (meaning "a person who ...") without regard for gender.
The genderless agent noun use apparently was a broader application of the original feminine suffix, beginning in the north of England, but linguists disagree over whether this indicates female domination of weaving and baking trades, as represented in surnames such as Webster, Baxter, Brewster, etc. (though modern spinster probably carries an originally female ending).
Also compare whitester "one who bleaches cloth;" kempster (c. 1400; Halliwell has it as kembster) "woman who cleans wool." Chaucer ("Merchant's Tale") has chidester "an angry woman" (the 17c. had scoldster). Also compare Middle English shepster (late 14c.) "dressmaker, female cutter-out," literally "shapester," sleestere (mid-15c.) "murderess, female killer" ("slay-ster"). Sewster "seamstress" (Middle English seuestre, late 13c. as a surname, also used of men) is still in Jonson but was obsolete or provincial after 17c. In Modern English, the suffix has been productive in forming derivative nouns (gamester, roadster, punster, rodster "angler," etc.). Thackeray (1850) has jocular spokester "female speaker or spokesman."
young (adj.)
Old English geong "youthful, young; recent, new, fresh," from Proto-Germanic *junga- (source also of Old Saxon and Old Frisian jung, Old Norse ungr, Middle Dutch jonc, Dutch jong, Old High German and German jung, Gothic juggs), from PIE *yuwn-ko-, suffixed form of root *yeu- "vital force, youthful vigor" (source also of Sanskrit yuvan- "young; young man;" Avestan yuuanem, yunam "youth," yoista- "youngest;" Latin juvenis "young," iunior "younger, more young;" Lithuanian jaunas, Old Church Slavonic junu, Russian junyj "young," Old Irish oac, Welsh ieuanc "young").

From c. 1830-1850, Young France, Young Italy, etc., were loosely applied to "republican agitators" in various monarchies; also, especially in Young England, Young America, used generally for "typical young person of the nation." For Young Turk, see Turk.

oldster (n.)
"old or oldish person, man past middle life," 1818, colloquial, originally nautical, from old + -ster, on analogy of youngster.

Monday 14 August 2023

Forever Avon

  









 
 
 
[Exterior of Liberator]
 
[Teleport section]
 
AVON 
If I go alone, can I pilot 
The Liberator indefinitely?
 
ORAC 
With the help of the automatics,
of course you can.
 
AVON 
I know that.
 
ORAC 
Then why did you ask 
The Question?
 
AVON [Smiles]
 I didn't. How long can 
I maintain myself?
 
ORAC 
Is that A Question?
 
AVON 
Yes.
 
ORAC 
We have concentrated food for one 
person for a thousand years.
 
AVON 
And Our Power is 
self-regenerating.
 
ORAC 
Affirmative.
 
AVON 
Can you plot courses to keep out of
the range of any known spaceship 
manned by The Federation?
 
ORAC 
The battle and navigation computers 
can handle that perfectly adequately.
 
AVON 
I asked if YOU could.
 
ORAC 
Of course, should 
it be necessary.
 
AVON 
Failing that, we are powerful enough 
to resist all but an attack by three 
Federation pursuit ships at once.
 
ORAC 
Is that A Question?
 
AVON 
No. If we go now, we can sail The Universe
for as long as we like in reasonable safety,
provided we keep out of everybody's way
and we do not do anything rash.
 
ORAC 
No data available to answer The Question --
if it was A Question.
 
AVON
I put it to you as a possibility :
I request The Odds.
 
ORAC
The odds would be 3.5:1 on Survival.
 
AVON
Therefore I do not need Blake,
I do not need any of the others ...
 
ORAC
Is that A Question?
 
AVON
... I do not need anybody at all.
 
ORAC
Is that A Question?
I -- I --
I must ask you to
be more specific.
 
AVON
Shut up, Orac.
 

Brighton Rock

Brighton Rock Movie Clip - Cliffs

We hope to return to the North Way, carrying home the oriental treasures from the Silk Lands in the east, but the dark curse follows our dragon ship.

Black fog turned day into night, and the fingers of death reached out from the waters to reclaim the treasure we have stolen.

I carve these stones in memory of Asmund, Grimvald, Torkal, Halfdan, brave Viking warriors slain by the curse.

We sought haven in Northumbria, and took refuge at a place called Maidens' Bay, but The Curse of The Treasure has followed us to this place. 

Maidens Bay? 

WAINWRIGHT: 
That's Maidens Point. 

Time’s Champion: 
But I've just left ACE! there. 

ACE!: 
Yep, but I'm here now, aren't I? What've you got there Professor? 

Time’s Champion : 
It's a translation of the Viking inscriptions. Look — 

And there's something I've just noticed. 

ACE! : 
What's that? 

Time’s Champion : 
Look. “We hope to return to the North Way, carrying home the oriental treasure.

NOW, listen to THIS. 

(The Doctor takes out Sorin's Sealed Orders.) 

Time’s Champion : 
“Vozravschayetes ve Norwegious sakrovisichem.”

ACE!: 
….I only did French O level. 

Time’s Champion : 
We return to Norway, 
the NORTH WAY, 
bearing The Treasure.

Now, let's see how Doctor Judson is getting along, shall we?

Adapted from Graham Greene's iconic 1939 novel, BRIGHTON ROCK charts the headlong fall of Pinkie, a razor-wielding disadvantaged teenager hell bent on clawing his way up through the ranks of organized crime. At the heart of the story is the anti-hero Pinkie's relationship with Rose - an apparently innocent young waitress who stumbles on evidence linking Pinkie and his gang to a revenge killing that Pinkie commits. 
After the murder, Pinkie seduces 
Rose, first in an effort to find out 
how much she knows and latterly to 
ensure she will not talk to the police. 

A love story between a murderer and a witness; can Pinkie trust Rose or 
should he kill her before 
she talks to the police? 
Can Rose trust Pinkie 
or is she next in line? 
Brighton Rock stars a remarkable cast including Sam Riley (Control) as Pinkie, Andrea Riseborough (BAFTA nominee for Margaret Thatcher: the Long Walk to Finchley) as Rose, Oscar winner Helen Mirren (The Queen) as Ida and John Hurt (1984, The Proposition) as Phil Corkery.

Monday 7 August 2023

The Seven Eternal Story Plots






According to the journalist Christopher Booker, the plots of all stories fall into seven basic categories. 

The names he gives to these seven plots are Overcoming the Monster, Rags to Riches, The Quest, Voyage and Return, Comedy, Tragedy, and Rebirth. 

The circumambient mythos, being A Story itself, must always fall into one of these categories. 

In the medieval Christian West, for example, the overriding plot structure of our culture was Voyage and Return. We had come from God, and it was back to God we would return. This narrative explained a relatively stable society with little in the way of technological change or economic expansion, and it remained the plot of our culture for many centuries. If there was a better world somewhere, then this was understood to be the Classical civilisations of the past. The idea that a better earthly world resided in the future was not part of the story. 

Around 500 years ago we slowly started to move to a different plot. As the insights of The Renaissance led to The Enlightenment, our focus moved from waiting for The Afterlife to actively working to materially improve our time on Earth. Our Story was now one of progress. This circumambient mythos is the reason why we automatically speak of ‘technological advancement’ instead of the more accurate ‘technological change’, even when we know that new technology does not necessarily make our society better

The name of this new plot, according to Booker’s list, was The Quest

We were on A Journey to a better place, provided we could overcome all the obstacles that the journey tests us with

If Hollywood is to be believed, we’ve now stopped using The Plot of The Quest, and the idea of progress, to understand ourselves. 

As the sociologist Robert Nisbet has written, ‘The skepticism regarding Western progress that was once confined to a very small number of intellectuals in the nineteenth century has grown and spread to not merely the large majority of intellectuals in this final quarter of the [twentieth] century, but to many millions of other people in The West.’ 

The story structure which Western culture adopted to replace The Quest is Tragedy

Tragedy, Booker tells us, is the story form that always ends in Defeat. According to Aristotle, the downfall of a character in a tragedy is not caused by outside forces, such as the gods or fate. Nor is it the result of vice or moral deficiency. Instead, there is a central character flaw in the heart of the hero which cannot be resolved. Aristotle used the word hamartia to describe this flaw, which translates as to miss the mark or to err. To possess hamartia is not to be a bad person, for there is no moral judgement involved. But it compels you to act in a way that causes events to evade your control, and these actions inevitably result in destruction. 

Booker, in the spirit of literary theorists since Aristotle, defines Tragedy in a particular way. Tragedy ‘shows a hero being tempted or impelled into a course of action which is in some way dark or forbidden’, he wrote. 

For a time, as The Hero embarks on a course, he enjoys almost unbelievable, dreamlike success,’ he continued. ‘But somehow it is in the nature of the course he is pursuing that he cannot achieve satisfaction. His mood is increasingly chequered by a sense of frustration. As he still pursues his dream, vainly trying to make his position secure, he begins to feel more and more threatened – things have got out of control. The original dream has soured into a nightmare and everything is going more and more wrong. This eventually culminates in the hero’s violent destruction.’ 

This is not, I think, a million miles away from how we see ourselves today

But there is also a narrative plot which, for the characters living it, appears to be identical to Tragedy. That plot is Comedy

Nowadays, we think of Comedy as something funny which has jokes in it. For this reason, schoolchildren often complain that the Greek or Elizabethan ‘Comedy’ they study is not funny. But, technically, Comedy is not defined by laughs. 

A Comedy is A Story that uses a plot structure similar to Tragedy, except that the character flaw or hamartia at the heart of The Story is not fatal. It can be resolved. In doing so this leads to a happy ending or a loving union. Traditional comedies are about people who don’t see themselves as who they truly are. They tell of peasants who have no idea that they are really royalty, or lovers who are blind to who their true love is. They are stories full of mistaken identities, cross-dressing and delusions. Yet those delusions can be overcome, and characters can gain a glimpse of The World as it appears through the audience’s eyes. 

As Booker describes comedy, ‘the essence of The Story is always that : 

(1) We see A World in which people have passed under a shadow of confusion, uncertainty and frustration, and are shut off from one another; 
(2) the confusion gets worse until the pressure of Darkness is at its most acute and everyone is in a nightmarish tangle; 
(3) Finally, with the coming to light of things not previously recognised, perceptions are dramatically changed. The shadows are dispelled, the situation is miraculously transformed and the little world is brought together in a state of joyful union.’ 

We think that The Plot we are enacting is Tragedy, but it could equally be the second part of Booker’s definition of Comedy. If there is a shift in perception coming that would reveal the plot as comedy, we would, by definition, be blind to it. 

Comedy is a clash of perspectives. 

Characters like Basil Fawlty or Alan Partridge do not know that their behaviour is outside that of the social norm, although the watching audience see this clearly. While Charlie Chaplin thinks that he is walking proudly into a happy future, the watching audience know that he is walking towards a banana skin. In order for Chaplin slipping on the banana skin to be funny, it is necessary for The Audience to know in advance that it is there, and for Chaplin to remain blissfully ignorant until the final moment. 

At this point, his view of The World collides with, and is destroyed by, the perspective of the watching audience. Even with surrealist humour or simple pratfalls, there is a clash between what should happen and what actually occurs. It is this collision of perspectives that causes laughter. The difference of awareness between the characters inside The Comedy and those outside means that it is not possible for those characters to know if they are in A Comedy. 

To them, it appears that they are in a Tragedy. The events that befall them are only funny from a higher perspective, and they remain ignorant of the bigger picture. They don’t know about the banana skin until the last moment.

Baby, It’s Cold Outside




In The Past
Politicians promised 
to create A Better World. 

They had Different Ways of achieving this, but
Their Power and Authority came 
from the optimistic Visions 
they offered to Their People. 

Those Dreams FAILED. 

And Today, People have 
Lost Faith in Ideologies. 

Increasingly, 
Politicians are seen simply 
as Managers of Public Life. 

But now, They have Discovered 
A NEW Role that restores 
Their Power and Authority. 

Instead of Delivering Dreams, Politicians now promise 
to Protect Us from  NIGHTMARES

They Say that 
They will rescue Us,
from dreadful Dangers 
that We cannot See and 
DO Not Understand. 

And The Great Danger of All — is

INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM.







The story begins in the summer of 1949... 

When a middle-aged school inspector from Egypt arrived at the small town of Greeley, in Colorado. His name was Sayyed Qutb

Qutb had been sent to the U.S. to study its educational system, and he enrolled in the local state college. His photographs appear in the college yearbook. 

But Qutb was destined to become much more than a school inspector. Out of his experiences of America that summer, Qutb was going to develop a powerful set of ideas that would directly inspire those who flew the planes on the attack of September the 11th

As he had traveled across the country, Qutb had become increasingly disenchanted with America. The very things that, on the surface, made the country look prosperous and happy, Qutb saw as signs of an inner corruption and decay.


JOHN CALVERT, Islamist historian: This was Truman’s America, and many Americans today regard it as a golden age of their civilization. But for Qutb, he saw a sinister side in this. All around him was crassness, corruption, vulgarity—talk centered on movie stars and automobile prices. 

He was also very concerned that the inhabitants of Greeley spent a lot of time in lawn care. Pruning their hedges, cutting their lawns. 

This, for Qutb, was indicative of the selfish and materialistic aspect of American life. Americans lived these isolated lives surrounded by their lawns. They lusted after material goods. And this, says Qutb quite succinctly, is the taste of America.

VO: What Qutb believed he was seeing was a hidden and dangerous reality underneath the surface of ordinary American life. One summer night, he went to a dance at a local church hall. He later wrote that what he saw that night crystallized his vision.

CALVERT: He talks about how the pastor played on the gramophone one of the big- band hits of the day, Baby, It’s Cold Outside.” 

He dimmed the lights so as to create a dreamy, romantic effect. 

And then, Qutb says that “chests met chests, arms circled waists, and the hall was full of lust and love.”

VO: To most people watching this dance, it would have been an innocent picture of youthful happiness. 

But Qutb saw something else : the dancers in front of him were tragic lost souls. They believed that they were free. But in reality, they were trapped by their own selfish and greedy desires. American society was not going forwards; it was taking people backwards. 

They were becoming isolated beings, driven by primitive animal forces. Such creatures, Qutb believed, could corrode the very bonds that held society together. And he became determined that night to prevent this culture of selfish Individualism taking over his own country.

Blake’s Heaven


What The actual FUCK 
Does THAT
Mean?


“In 1975, Terry Nation attended a meeting with Ronnie Marsh, the BBC's Head of Serials, to discuss ideas for new television series. Marsh was looking for formats for co-productions with American television channels. 

Nation suggested a number of ideas, mostly for crime dramas, none of which appealed to Marsh. 

According to Nation, "...the interview was drawing to a close when I surprised myself by starting to detail a new science fiction adventure.

Have you got a title?' someone asked. 

Blake's 7” I replied without hesitation."

Nation left the meeting with a commission for a pilot script and "...the bewildered feeling that
I could not trace The SOURCE of The Idea".


“The QuestWe were on a journey to a better place, provided we could overcome all the obstacles that the journey tests us withIf Hollywood is to be believed, we’ve now stopped using the plot of The Quest, and the idea of progress, to understand ourselves. 

As the sociologist Robert Nisbet has written, ‘The skepticism regarding Western Progress that was once confined to a very small number of intellectuals in the nineteenth century has grown and spread to not merely the large majority of intellectuals in this final quarter of the [twentieth] century, but to many millions of other people in The West.’ 

The Story Structure which Western culture adopted to replace The Quest is Tragedy

Tragedy, Booker tells us, is the story form that always ends in Defeat

According to Aristotle, The Downfall of a character in a Tragedy is not caused by outside forces, such as The Gods or Fate. Nor is it the result of vice or moral deficiency. Instead, there is a central character flaw in The Heart of The Hero which cannot be resolved. 

Aristotle used the word hamartia to describe this flaw, which translates as To Miss The Mark or To Err. To possess hamartia is not to be a “bad person”, for there is no moral Judgement involved. 

But it compels You to act in a way that causes events to evade Your Control, and these actions inevitably result in Destruction

Booker, in the spirit of literary theorists since Aristotle, defines Tragedy in a particular way. Tragedyshows A Hero being tempted or impelled into a course of action which is in some way dark or forbidden’, he wrote. 

For a Time, as The Hero embarks on a course, he enjoys almost unbelievable, dreamlike success,’ he continued. 

But somehow it is in The Nature of The Course he is pursuing that he cannot achieve satisfaction. 

His mood is increasingly chequered by a sense of frustration

As he still pursues His Dream, vainly trying to make his position secure, he begins to feel more and more threatened – things have got out of Control

The Original Dream has soured into a nightmare and everything is going more and more Wrong

This eventually culminates in The Hero’s violent destruction.’ 

This is not, I Think, a million miles away from How We see ourselves Today



The secondary character of Avon seemed to me to be a far more attractive and dominant character than Blake himself.

"Aaah. He (Paul Darrow) took hold of the part and made it his own. It could have been a very dull role, but this particular actor took hold of it and gave it much better dimensions than I’d ever put on paper. He is an enormously popular character. He is incredibly popular – and rightly so. He’s a good actor. I think he’s terrific. I enjoy watching him all the time. This is how stars emerge, I suppose : it’s the actor’s doing."

Sunday 6 August 2023

Parallax

Here is The Problem :


In a contemporary play, someone says : 

"Hey, you. Go over there, get that 

thing and bring it to me." 


That would be the line


Shakespeare says it : 

"Be Mercury, set feathers 

to thy heels,

and fly like Thought

 from them to me again." 


Al Pachino :

You can do something from Shakespeare,

think that you're feeling it or whatever. 

Mm-hm. You love it. You think 

You're communicating it --


And the person you said it to… has 

not understood a word you said. 

You can't believe they didn't. 


"Thoust" and, you know...

just the way it's worded, 

that confuses the people of,

 you know... ...this time period. 

Shakespeare used a lot 

of fancy words. You know? 

And it's hard to understand, 

to grasp them. 


Al Pachino :

Excuse me -- They're 

not ‘fancy words.’ 

That's where we get confused

But they're poetry

It's hard to grab hold 

of some rap slang, too. 

It's hard to get hold of it 

until your ear gets tuned. 

You have to tune-up












  “I would like to try my hand at explaining The Meaning of the illustration, based on an ancient alchemical woodcut, that opens this chapter. Describing What it Signifies reveals how much information can be contained within an image without the viewer possessing any explicit understanding of its contents (such a picture is in fact better considered an early stage in The Process by which such explicit understanding develops). The ancient alchemist* who produced The Picture was Dreaming, in a very real sense, while doing so —

Dreaming about what a person could be, and How that might come about.


  At the very base of the image is a winged sphere. Atop that perches a dragon. Standing on The Dragon is a two-headed human figure — one head male, the other female. The male head is associated with an image of the Sun; the female, with the Moon. In between but also above the two heads is the symbol for Mercury : God, Planet, and Metal, simultaneously. A variety of additional symbols round out the picture. Everything portrayed is enveloped in an egg-shaped container. This arrangement indicates that the image is of many things inside one thing — a multiplicity in a unity — just as an unhatched chick is encapsulated within a single container but is many increasingly differentiated and complex biological parts, particularly in its later stages of development. In its entirety, the image is labeled materia prima—Latin for the “primal element.


  The alchemists regarded the materia prima as the fundamental substance from which everything else — matter and spirit included, equally — emerged, or was derived. You can profitably consider that primal element the potential we face when we confront The Future, including Our Future Selvesor the potential we cannot help upbraiding ourselves and others for wasting. It can also be usefully conceptualised as The Information from which We Build Ourselves and The World, instead of the matter out of which we generally consider reality composed. Each interpretation —Potential and Information — has its advantages.


  What does it mean that The world can be usefully considered as potential or information? Think about what happens, for example, when you stop by the mailbox and pick up your mail. Consider, as well, what that mail is “made of.” Materially speaking, it is merely paper and ink. But that material substrate is essentially irrelevant. It would not matter if the message was delivered by email or voice — or in Morse code, for that matter. What is relevant is the content. And that means that each piece of mail is a container of content — of Potential or Information, positive, neutral, or negative. Maybe, for example, it is a notification of investigation from your country’s tax department. This means that, despite its apparently harmless presence in your hand, the letter is tightly and inextricably connected to a gigantic, complex and oft-arbitrary structure that may well not have your best interests in mind. Alternatively, perhaps it is something joyful, such as an unexpected letter from someone loved or a long-awaited check. From such a perspective, an envelope is a container — a mysterious container, at least in potential — from which an entire new world might emerge.


  Everyone understands this idea, even if they do not know it. If you have been having trouble with the tax authorities, for example, and you receive an official piece of mail from their agency, your blood pressure will increase (or drop precipitously), your heart will pound, your palms will sweat, and a feeling of intense fear, even doom, may sweep over you. That is the instinctive response, associated with preparation for action, that accompanies exposure to danger. And now you will have to decide : are you going to open the letter and face what is “inside”? And, having done so, are you going to think your way through The Problem, terrible as that might be, and begin to address it? Or are you going to ignore what you now know, pretend that everything is all right (even though you know, emotionally — as a consequence of your anxiety — that it is not), and pay the inevitable psychological and physical price? It is the former route that will require you to voluntarily confront what you are afraid of — the terrible, abstract monster — and, hypothetically, to become stronger and more integrated as a result. It is the latter route that will leave The Problem in its monstrous form and force you to suffer like a scared animal confronted by a predator’s vicious eyes in the pitch of night.


  A winged sphere, inscribed with a square, a triangle, and the numerals 3 and 4 occupies the bottom third of the image in question.* This singular entity or object was known by the alchemists as the “round chaos.3 It is a containerthe initial container of the primordial elementthe container of what The World, and The Psyche, consists of before it becomes differentiated. This is The Potential, or Information. This is what attracts your attention unconsciously and compels you to attend to something before you know why it has gripped your interest. This is when and where what is new makes its entrance into what is predictable and certain (for better or worse); what flits about you, with little voluntary control—as if it is something winged—as your imagination and your attention move unpredictably but meaningfully from association to association; and it is what you are looking at when you have no idea what it is you are confronting. Finally, it is what you cannot look away from when you are possessed by horror, even as such potential for horror simultaneously adds vital interest to life.


  Strangely, the round chaos may be familiar to modern audiences (again, even if they do not know it), because of the Harry Potter series of books and films. J. K. Rowling, the series author, takes some pains to describe a sporting event, Quidditch, which helps to define and unify Hogwarts. The point of Quidditch is to drive a ball (the Quaffle) through one of the three hoops guarded by the opposing team, while flying about the playing pitch on enchanted brooms. Success in doing so gains the scorer’s team 10 points. Simultaneously, two separate players (one from each team) play another game—a game within the game. Chosen for their exceptional skill in attention and flight, these two competitors—known as Seekers—attempt to locate, chase, and capture a winged ball, the Snitch, which is identical in appearance to the round chaos that sits at the bottom of the alchemist’s image. The Snitch is golden — indicating its exceptional value and purity* — and zips around chaotically, at a very fast rate, darting, weaving, bobbing, and racing the Seekers as they pursue it astride their brooms. If a Seeker captures the Snitch, his or her team gains 150 points (typically enough to ensure victory) and the entire game comes to an end. This indicates that chasing and capturing whatever is represented by the Snitch—and, by implication, the round chaos—is a goal whose importance supersedes any other.* Why is Rowling’s game, conjured up for us by her deep imagination, structured in that manner? What does her narrative idea signify? There are two ways of answering these questions (although both answers relate importantly to each other) :


  First: In Rule I, we discussed the idea that the true winner of any game is the person who plays fair. This is because playing fair, despite the particularities of any given game, is a higher-order accomplishment than mere victory. Striving to play fair, in the ultimate sense—following the spirit of the rules, as well as the letter—is an indication of true personality development, predicated as it is on concern for true reciprocity. The Seekers of the Snitch must ignore the details of the game of Quidditch, of which they are still a part, while attempting to find and seize the Snitch, just as the player of a real-world game must ignore the particularities of that game while attending to what constitutes truly ethical play, regardless of what is happening on the playing field. Thus, the ethical player, like the Seeker, indomitably pursues what is most valuable in the midst of complex, competing obligations.


  Second : Among the alchemists, the round chaos was associated with the winged god Mercury, who served as messenger from the realm of the divine, guide of souls to the underworld, and bringer of good fortune. It is for this reason that the ancient symbol for Mercury is located at the very pinnacle (the most important location) of the image in question. It is an attempt to indicate what guides the process that the picture represents. Centuries ago, prior to the dawn of modern chemistry, the god Mercury represented what inspires or attracts interest involuntarily. He was the spirit who possessed a person when his or her attention was drawn irresistibly to some person, situation, or event. Imagine that there are very complex processes going on in your mind unconsciously, highlighting events of potential worth and distinguishing them from everything else constantly unfolding around you. Imagine that those processes that distinguish value are alive, which is certainly the case, and that they are complex and integrated enough to be conceptualized as a personality. That is Mercury. The draw he exerts on our attention reveals itself in a sense of significance—in the sense that something happening around you is worth attending to, or contains something of value. The Seeker—in real life, as well as in Rowling’s Potter series and its Quidditch game—is he or she who takes that sense of significance more seriously than anything else. The Seeker is therefore the person who is playing the game that everyone else is playing (and who is disciplined and expert at the game), but who is also playing an additional, higher-order game: the pursuit of what is of primary significance. The Snitch (like the round chaos) can therefore be considered the “container” of that primary significance—that meaning—and, therefore, something revelatory when pursued and caught. We might in this context remember what has come to be known as the Golden Rule: “And as ye would that men should do to you, do ye also to them likewise” (Luke 6:31). There is nothing more important than learning to strive under difficult and frustrating circumstances to play fair. This is what should be chased, so to speak, during any game (even though it is also important to try to obtain victory in the game).*


  Each of us, when fortunate, is compelled forward by something that grips our attention—love of a person; a sport; a political, sociological, or economic problem, or a scientific question; a passion for art, literature, or drama—something that calls to us for reasons we can neither control nor understand (try to make yourself interested in something you just do not care about and see how well that works). The phenomena that grip us (phenomena: from the Greek word phainesthai, “to appear, or to be brought to light”) are like lamps along a dark path: they are part of the unconscious processes devoted to integrating and furthering the development of our spirits, the furtherance of our psychological development. You do not choose what interests you. It chooses you. Something manifests itself out of the darkness as compelling, as worth living for; following that, something moves us further down the road, to the next meaningful manifestation—and so it goes, as we continue to seek, develop, grow, and thrive. It is a perilous journey, but it is also the adventure of our lives. Think of pursuing someone you love: catch them or not, you change in the process. Think, as well, of the traveling you have done, or of the work you have undertaken, whether for pleasure or necessity. In all these cases you experience what is new. Sometimes that is painful; sometimes it is better than anything else that has ever happened to you. Either way, it is deeply informative. It is all part of the potential of the world, calling you into Being, changing you forever—for better or worse—in consequence of your pursuit.


  Atop the round chaos perches a dragon. This is because what is interesting and meaningful (and novel and unexpected, as those all go together) manifests itself in a form that is both dangerous and promising, particularly when its grip is intense and irresistible. The danger is, of course, signified by the presence of the immortal, predatory reptile; the promise is hinted at, as a dragon archetypally guards a great treasure. Thus, the drawing represents a psychological progression. First, you find yourself interested in something. That something (the round chaos) contains or is composed of potential, or information. If it is pursued and caught, it releases that information. Out of that information We build The world we perceive, and We build ourselves as Perceivers. Thus, the round chaos is the container from which both matter (the world) and spirit (our psyches) emerge. There is some numerological indication of this on the spherical body of the round chaos itself : the number 3, accompanied by a triangle, which is traditionally associated with spirit (because of its association with the Holy Trinity), and the number 4, associated with the world of matter (because of its association with the four traditional elements: earth, water, wind, and fire). The Dragon, in turn, perched on top of the round chaos, represents the danger and possibility of the information within.


  Atop The Dragon stands a figure known as a Rebis, a single body with two heads, one male, one female. The Rebis is a symbol of the fully developed personality that can emerge from forthright and courageous pursuit of What is Meaningful (the round chaos) and Dangerous and Promising (the dragon). It has a symbolically masculine aspect, which typically stands for exploration, order, and rationality (indicated by the Sun, which can be seen to the left of the male head), and a symbolically feminine aspect, which stands for chaos, promise, care, renewal, and emotion (indicated by the Moon, to the right of the female). In the course of normal socialization, it is typical for one of these aspects to become more developed than the other (as males are socialized in the male manner, to which they are also inclined biologically, and females in the female manner). Nonetheless, it is possible—with enough exploration, enough exposure to the round chaos and the dragon—to develop both elements. That constitutes an ideal—or so goes the alchemical intuition.


  Out of The Unknown — The Potential that makes up The World — comes the terrible but promising form of the dragon, peril and promise united. It is an eternal dichotomy echoed by the presence of the two remaining symbols to the right and above the dragon’s tail: Jupiter, representing the positive, and Saturn, the negative. Out of the confrontation with peril and promise emerges the masculine and feminine aspects of the psyche, working together in harmony. Guiding The Process is the spirit Mercurius, manifesting itself as Meaning in The World, working through unconscious means to attract exploration to what will unite the various discordant and warring elements of The Personality. This can all be read, appropriately, as A Story of the development of The Ideal Personality — an attempt, in image, to describe what each of us could be.”