Showing posts with label Alexa. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Alexa. Show all posts

Wednesday 14 September 2022

Oceanic







She was leaning forward on her seat. “You think of everything. . . . You’ll get me off, Tom?” she asked in a gust of anguish, lifting her veil brusquely to look at her saviour.


She had uncovered a face like adamant. And out of this face the eyes looked on, big, dry, enlarged, lightless, burnt out like two black holes in the white, shining globes.


“There is no danger,” he said, gazing into them with an earnestness almost rapt, which to Mrs Verloc, flying from the gallows, seemed to be full of force and tenderness. This devotion deeply moved her—and the adamantine face lost the stern rigidity of its terror. Comrade Ossipon gazed at it as no lover ever gazed at his mistress’s face. Alexander Ossipon, anarchist, nicknamed The Doctor, author of a medical (and improper) pamphlet, late lecturer on the social aspects of hygiene to working men’s clubs, was free from the trammels of conventional morality—but he submitted to the rule of science. He was scientific, and he gazed scientifically at that woman, the sister of a degenerate, a degenerate herself—of a murdering type. He gazed at her, and invoked Lombroso, as an Italian peasant recommends himself to his favourite saint. He gazed scientifically. He gazed at her cheeks, at her nose, at her eyes, at her ears. . . . Bad! . . . Fatal! Mrs Verloc’s pale lips parting, slightly relaxed under his passionately attentive gaze, he gazed also at her teeth. . . . Not a doubt remained . . . a murdering type. . . . If Comrade Ossipon did not recommend his terrified soul to Lombroso, it was only because on scientific grounds he could not believe that he carried about him such a thing as a soul. But he had in him the scientific spirit, which moved him to testify on the platform of a railway station in nervous jerky phrases.


“He was an extraordinary lad, that brother of yours. Most interesting to study. A perfect type in a way. Perfect!”


He spoke scientifically in his secret fear. And Mrs Verloc, hearing these words of commendation vouchsafed to her beloved dead, swayed forward with a flicker of light in her sombre eyes, like a ray of sunshine heralding a tempest of rain.


“He was that indeed,” she whispered softly, with quivering lips. “You took a lot of notice of him, Tom. I loved you for it.”


“It’s almost incredible the resemblance there was between you two,” pursued Ossipon, giving a voice to his abiding dread, and trying to conceal his nervous, sickening impatience for the train to start. “Yes; he resembled you.”


These words were not especially touching or sympathetic. But the fact of that resemblance insisted upon was enough in itself to act upon her emotions powerfully. With a little faint cry, and throwing her arms out, Mrs Verloc burst into tears at last.


Ossipon entered the carriage, hastily closed the door and looked out to see the time by the station clock. Eight minutes more. For the first three of these Mrs Verloc wept violently and helplessly without pause or interruption. Then she recovered somewhat, and sobbed gently in an abundant fall of tears. She tried to talk to her saviour, to the man who was the messenger of life.


“Oh, Tom! How could I fear to die after he was taken away from me so cruelly! How could I! How could I be such a coward!”


She lamented aloud her love of life, that life without grace or charm, and almost without decency, but of an exalted faithfulness of purpose, even unto murder. And, as often happens in the lament of poor humanity, rich in suffering but indigent in words, the truth—the very cry of truth—was found in a worn and artificial shape picked up somewhere among the phrases of sham sentiment.


“How could I be so afraid of death! Tom, I tried. But I am afraid. I tried to do away with myself. And I couldn’t. Am I hard? I suppose the cup of horrors was not full enough for such as me. Then when you came. . . . ”


She paused. Then in a gust of confidence and gratitude, “I will live all my days for you, Tom!” she sobbed out.


“Go over into the other corner of the carriage, away from the platform,” said Ossipon solicitously. She let her saviour settle her comfortably, and he watched the coming on of another crisis of weeping, still more violent than the first. He watched the symptoms with a sort of medical air, as if counting seconds. He heard the guard’s whistle at last. An involuntary contraction of the upper lip bared his teeth with all the aspect of savage resolution as he felt the train beginning to move. Mrs Verloc heard and felt nothing, and Ossipon, her saviour, stood still. He felt the train roll quicker, rumbling heavily to the sound of the woman’s loud sobs, and then crossing the carriage in two long strides he opened the door deliberately, and leaped out.


He had leaped out at the very end of the platform; and such was his determination in sticking to his desperate plan that he managed by a sort of miracle, performed almost in the air, to slam to the door of the carriage. Only then did he find himself rolling head over heels like a shot rabbit. He was bruised, shaken, pale as death, and out of breath when he got up. But he was calm, and perfectly able to meet the excited crowd of railway men who had gathered round him in a moment. He explained, in gentle and convincing tones, that his wife had started at a moment’s notice for Brittany to her dying mother; that, of course, she was greatly up-set, and he considerably concerned at her state; that he was trying to cheer her up, and had absolutely failed to notice at first that the train was moving out. To the general exclamation, “Why didn’t you go on to Southampton, then, sir?” he objected the inexperience of a young sister-in-law left alone in the house with three small children, and her alarm at his absence, the telegraph offices being closed. He had acted on impulse. “But I don’t think I’ll ever try that again,” he concluded; smiled all round; distributed some small change, and marched without a limp out of the station.


Outside, Comrade Ossipon, flush of safe banknotes as never before in his life, refused the offer of a cab.


“I can walk,” he said, with a little friendly laugh to the civil driver.


He could walk. He walked. He crossed the bridge. Later on the towers of the Abbey saw in their massive immobility the yellow bush of his hair passing under the lamps. The lights of Victoria saw him too, and Sloane Square, and the railings of the park. And Comrade Ossipon once more found himself on a bridge. The river, a sinister marvel of still shadows and flowing gleams mingling below in a black silence, arrested his attention. He stood looking over the parapet for a long time. The clock tower boomed a brazen blast above his drooping head. He looked up at the dial. . . . Half-past twelve of a wild night in the Channel.


And again Comrade Ossipon walked. His robust form was seen that night in distant parts of the enormous town slumbering monstrously on a carpet of mud under a veil of raw mist. It was seen crossing the streets without life and sound, or diminishing in the interminable straight perspectives of shadowy houses bordering empty roadways lined by strings of gas lamps. He walked through Squares, Places, Ovals, Commons, through monotonous streets with unknown names where the dust of humanity settles inert and hopeless out of the stream of life. He walked. And suddenly turning into a strip of a front garden with a mangy grass plot, he let himself into a small grimy house with a latch-key he took out of his pocket.


He threw himself down on his bed all dressed, and lay still for a whole quarter of an hour. Then he sat up suddenly, drawing up his knees, and clasping his legs. The first dawn found him open-eyed, in that same posture. This man who could walk so long, so far, so aimlessly, without showing a sign of fatigue, could also remain sitting still for hours without stirring a limb or an eyelid. But when the late sun sent its rays into the room he unclasped his hands, and fell back on the pillow. His eyes stared at the ceiling. And suddenly they closed. Comrade Ossipon slept in the sunlight.

CHAPTER XIII

The enormous iron padlock on the doors of the wall cupboard was the only object in the room on which the eye could rest without becoming afflicted by the miserable unloveliness of forms and the poverty of material. Unsaleable in the ordinary course of business on account of its noble proportions, it had been ceded to the Professor for a few pence by a marine dealer in the east of London. The room was large, clean, respectable, and poor with that poverty suggesting the starvation of every human need except mere bread. There was nothing on the walls but the paper, an expanse of arsenical green, soiled with indelible smudges here and there, and with stains resembling faded maps of uninhabited continents.


At a deal table near a window sat Comrade Ossipon, holding his head between his fists. The Professor, dressed in his only suit of shoddy tweeds, but flapping to and fro on the bare boards a pair of incredibly dilapidated slippers, had thrust his hands deep into the overstrained pockets of his jacket. He was relating to his robust guest a visit he had lately been paying to the Apostle Michaelis. The Perfect Anarchist had even been unbending a little.


“The fellow didn’t know anything of Verloc’s death. Of course! He never looks at the newspapers. They make him too sad, he says. But never mind. I walked into his cottage. Not a soul anywhere. I had to shout half-a-dozen times before he answered me. I thought he was fast asleep yet, in bed. But not at all. He had been writing his book for four hours already. He sat in that tiny cage in a litter of manuscript. There was a half-eaten raw carrot on the table near him. His breakfast. He lives on a diet of raw carrots and a little milk now.”


“How does he look on it?” asked Comrade Ossipon listlessly.


“Angelic. . . . I picked up a handful of his pages from the floor. The poverty of reasoning is astonishing. He has no logic. He can’t think consecutively. But that’s nothing. He has divided his biography into three parts, entitled—‘Faith, Hope, Charity.’ He is elaborating now the idea of a world planned out like an immense and nice hospital, with gardens and flowers, in which the strong are to devote themselves to the nursing of the weak.”


The Professor paused.


“Conceive you this folly, Ossipon? The weak! The source of all evil on this earth!” he continued with his grim assurance. “I told him that I dreamt of a world like shambles, where the weak would be taken in hand for utter extermination.”


“Do you understand, Ossipon? The source of all evil! They are our sinister masters—the weak, the flabby, the silly, the cowardly, the faint of heart, and the slavish of mind. They have power. They are the multitude. Theirs is the kingdom of the earth. Exterminate, exterminate! That is the only way of progress. It is! Follow me, Ossipon. First the great multitude of the weak must go, then the only relatively strong. You see? First the blind, then the deaf and the dumb, then the halt and the lame—and so on. Every taint, every vice, every prejudice, every convention must meet its doom.”


“And what remains?” asked Ossipon in a stifled voice.


I remain — if I am strong enough,” asserted the sallow little Professor, whose large ears, thin like membranes, and standing far out from the sides of his frail skull, took on suddenly a deep red tint.


“Haven’t I suffered enough from this oppression of the weak?” he continued forcibly. Then tapping the breast-pocket of his jacket: “And yet I am the force,” he went on. “But the time! The time! Give me time! Ah! that multitude, too stupid to feel either pity or fear. Sometimes I think they have everything on their side. Everything—even death—my own weapon.”


“Come and drink some beer with me at the Silenus,” said the robust Ossipon after an interval of silence pervaded by the rapid flap, flap of the slippers on the feet of the Perfect Anarchist. This last accepted. He was jovial that day in his own peculiar way. He slapped Ossipon’s shoulder.


“Beer! So be it! Let us drink and be merry, for we are strong, and to-morrow we die.”


He busied himself with putting on his boots, and talked meanwhile in his curt, resolute tones.


“What’s the matter with you, Ossipon? You look glum and seek even my company. I hear that you are seen constantly in places where men utter foolish things over glasses of liquor. Why? Have you abandoned your collection of women? They are the weak who feed the strong—eh?”


He stamped one foot, and picked up his other laced boot, heavy, thick-soled, unblacked, mended many times. He smiled to himself grimly.


“Tell me, Ossipon, terrible man, has ever one of your victims killed herself for you—or are your triumphs so far incomplete—for blood alone puts a seal on greatness? Blood. Death. Look at history.”


“You be damned,” said Ossipon, without turning his head.


“Why? Let that be the hope of the weak, whose theology has invented hell for the strong. Ossipon, my feeling for you is amicable contempt. You couldn’t kill a fly.”


But rolling to the feast on the top of the omnibus the Professor lost his high spirits. The contemplation of the multitudes thronging the pavements extinguished his assurance under a load of doubt and uneasiness which he could only shake off after a period of seclusion in the room with the large cupboard closed by an enormous padlock.


“And so,” said over his shoulder Comrade Ossipon, who sat on the seat behind. “And so Michaelis dreams of a world like a beautiful and cheery hospital.”


“Just so. An immense charity for the healing of the weak,” assented the Professor sardonically.


“That’s silly,” admitted Ossipon. “You can’t heal weakness. But after all Michaelis may not be so far wrong. In two hundred years doctors will rule the world. Science reigns already. It reigns in the shade maybe—but it reigns. And all science must culminate at last in the science of healing—not the weak, but the strong. Mankind wants to live — to live.”


“Mankind,” asserted the Professor with a self-confident glitter of his iron-rimmed spectacles, “does not know what it wants.”


“But you do,” growled Ossipon. “Just now you’ve been crying for time—time. Well. The doctors will serve you out your time—if you are good. You profess yourself to be one of the strong—because you carry in your pocket enough stuff to send yourself and, say, twenty other people into eternity. But eternity is a damned hole. It’s time that you need. You—if you met a man who could give you for certain ten years of time, you would call him your master.”


“My device is: No God! No Master,” said the Professor sententiously as he rose to get off the ’bus.


Ossipon followed. “Wait till you are lying flat on your back at the end of your time,” he retorted, jumping off the footboard after the other. “Your scurvy, shabby, mangy little bit of time,” he continued across the street, and hopping on to the curbstone.


“Ossipon, I think that you are a humbug,” the Professor said, opening masterfully the doors of the renowned Silenus. And when they had established themselves at a little table he developed further this gracious thought. “You are not even a doctor. But you are funny. Your notion of a humanity universally putting out the tongue and taking the pill from pole to pole at the bidding of a few solemn jokers is worthy of the prophet. Prophecy! What’s the good of thinking of what will be!” He raised his glass. “To the destruction of what is,” he said calmly.


He drank and relapsed into his peculiarly close manner of silence. The thought of a mankind as numerous as the sands of the sea-shore, as indestructible, as difficult to handle, oppressed him. The sound of exploding bombs was lost in their immensity of passive grains without an echo. For instance, this Verloc affair. Who thought of it now?


Ossipon, as if suddenly compelled by some mysterious force, pulled a much-folded newspaper out of his pocket. The Professor raised his head at the rustle.


“What’s that paper? Anything in it?” he asked.


Ossipon started like a scared somnambulist.


“Nothing. Nothing whatever. The thing’s ten days old. I forgot it in my pocket, I suppose.”


But he did not throw the old thing away. Before returning it to his pocket he stole a glance at the last lines of a paragraph. They ran thus: “An impenetrable mystery seems destined to hang for ever over this act of madness or despair.”


Such were the end words of an item of news headed: “Suicide of Lady Passenger from a cross-Channel Boat.” Comrade Ossipon was familiar with the beauties of its journalistic style. “An impenetrable mystery seems destined to hang for ever. . . . ” He knew every word by heart. “An impenetrable mystery. . . . ”


And the robust anarchist, hanging his head on his breast, fell into a long reverie.


He was menaced by this thing in the very sources of his existence. He could not issue forth to meet his various conquests, those that he courted on benches in Kensington Gardens, and those he met near area railings, without the dread of beginning to talk to them of an impenetrable mystery destined. . . . He was becoming scientifically afraid of insanity lying in wait for him amongst these lines. “To hang for ever over.” It was an obsession, a torture. He had lately failed to keep several of these appointments, whose note used to be an unbounded trustfulness in the language of sentiment and manly tenderness. The confiding disposition of various classes of women satisfied the needs of his self-love, and put some material means into his hand. He needed it to live. It was there. But if he could no longer make use of it, he ran the risk of starving his ideals and his body . . . “This act of madness or despair.”


“An impenetrable mystery” was sure “to hang for ever” as far as all mankind was concerned. But what of that if he alone of all men could never get rid of the cursed knowledge? And Comrade Ossipon’s knowledge was as precise as the newspaper man could make it—up to the very threshold of the “mystery destined to hang for ever. . . .”


Comrade Ossipon was well informed. He knew what the gangway man of the steamer had seen: “A lady in a black dress and a black veil, wandering at midnight alongside, on the quay. ‘Are you going by the boat, ma’am,’ he had asked her encouragingly. ‘This way.’ She seemed not to know what to do. He helped her on board. She seemed weak.”


And he knew also what the stewardess had seen: A lady in black with a white face standing in the middle of the empty ladies’ cabin. The stewardess induced her to lie down there. The lady seemed quite unwilling to speak, and as if she were in some awful trouble. The next the stewardess knew she was gone from the ladies’ cabin. The stewardess then went on deck to look for her, and Comrade Ossipon was informed that the good woman found the unhappy lady lying down in one of the hooded seats. Her eyes were open, but she would not answer anything that was said to her. She seemed very ill. The stewardess fetched the chief steward, and those two people stood by the side of the hooded seat consulting over their extraordinary and tragic passenger. They talked in audible whispers (for she seemed past hearing) of St Malo and the Consul there, of communicating with her people in England. Then they went away to arrange for her removal down below, for indeed by what they could see of her face she seemed to them to be dying. But Comrade Ossipon knew that behind that white mask of despair there was struggling against terror and despair a vigour of vitality, a love of life that could resist the furious anguish which drives to murder and the fear, the blind, mad fear of the gallows. He knew. But the stewardess and the chief steward knew nothing, except that when they came back for her in less than five minutes the lady in black was no longer in the hooded seat. She was nowhere. She was gone. It was then five o’clock in the morning, and it was no accident either. An hour afterwards one of the steamer’s hands found a wedding ring left lying on the seat. It had stuck to the wood in a bit of wet, and its glitter caught the man’s eye. There was a date, 24th June 1879, engraved inside. “An impenetrable mystery is destined to hang for ever. . . . ”


And Comrade Ossipon raised his bowed head, beloved of various humble women of these isles, Apollo-like in the sunniness of its bush of hair.


The Professor had grown restless meantime. He rose.


“Stay,” said Ossipon hurriedly. “Here, what do you know of madness and despair?”


The Professor passed the tip of his tongue on his dry, thin lips, and said doctorally:

“There are no such things. All passion is lost now. The world is mediocre, limp, without force. And madness and despair are a force. And force is a crime in the eyes of the fools, the weak and the silly who rule the roost. You are mediocre. Verloc, whose affair the police has managed to smother so nicely, was mediocre. And the police murdered him. He was mediocre. Everybody is mediocre. Madness and despair! Give me that for a lever, and I’ll move the world. Ossipon, you have my cordial scorn. You are incapable of conceiving even what the fat-fed citizen would call a crime. You have no force.He paused, smiling sardonically under the fierce glitter of his thick glasses.


“And let me tell you that this little legacy they say you’ve come into has not improved your intelligence. You sit at your beer like a dummy. Good-bye.”


“Will you have it?” said Ossipon, looking up with an idiotic grin.


“Have what?”


“The legacy. All of it.”


The incorruptible Professor only smiled. His clothes were all but falling off him, his boots, shapeless with repairs, heavy like lead, let water in at every step. He said:


“I will send you by-and-by a small bill for certain chemicals which I shall order to-morrow. I need them badly. Understood — eh?


Ossipon lowered his head slowly. He was alone. “An impenetrable mystery. . . . ” It seemed to him that suspended in the air before him he saw his own brain pulsating to the rhythm of an impenetrable mystery. It was diseased clearly. . . . “This act of madness or despair.”


The mechanical piano near the door played through a valse cheekily, then fell silent all at once, as if gone grumpy.


Comrade Ossipon, nicknamed the Doctor, went out of the Silenus beer-hall. At the door he hesitated, blinking at a not too splendid sunlight—and the paper with the report of the suicide of a lady was in his pocket. His heart was beating against it. The suicide of a lady—this act of madness or despair.


He walked along the street without looking where he put his feet; and he walked in a direction which would not bring him to the place of appointment with another lady (an elderly nursery governess putting her trust in an Apollo-like ambrosial head). He was walking away from it. He could face no woman. It was ruin. He could neither think, work, sleep, nor eat. But he was beginning to drink with pleasure, with anticipation, with hope. It was ruin. His revolutionary career, sustained by the sentiment and trustfulness of many women, was menaced by an impenetrable mystery—the mystery of a human brain pulsating wrongfully to the rhythm of journalistic phrases. “ . . . Will hang for ever over this act. . . . It was inclining towards the gutter . . . of madness or despair.”


“I am seriously ill,” he muttered to himself with scientific insight. Already his robust form, with an Embassy’s secret-service money (inherited from Mr Verloc) in his pockets, was marching in the gutter as if in training for the task of an inevitable future. Already he bowed his broad shoulders, his head of ambrosial locks, as if ready to receive the leather yoke of the sandwich board. As on that night, more than a week ago, Comrade Ossipon walked without looking where he put his feet, feeling no fatigue, feeling nothing, seeing nothing, hearing not a sound. “An impenetrable mystery. . . .” He walked disregarded. . . . “This act of madness or despair.”


And the incorruptible Professor walked too, averting his eyes from the odious multitude of mankind. He had no future. He disdained it. He was a force. His thoughts caressed the images of ruin and destruction. He walked frail, insignificant, shabby, miserable — and terrible in the simplicity of his idea calling madness and despair to the regeneration of the world. Nobody looked at him. He passed on unsuspected and deadly, like a pest in the street full of men.


Saturday 10 September 2022

Alexandra, Princess of Wales




Gentlemen, Her 
Royal Highness...
HRH Alexandra, 
Princess of Wales :
Good morning, gentlemen. 
I hope I am not disturbing you.

Gielgood :
On the contrary, ma'am. 
Your presence here is always greatly appreciated.
We were just taking a vote on Mr. Merrick.
Her Royal Highness has shown 
the greatest interest in His Fate.

HRH Alexandra, 
Princess of Wales :
Indeed I have, sir, as has The Queen.
I have a brief communication from Her Majesty
which she has requested that I read to you :
"To the Governing Committee, 
London Hospital
I would very much like 
to commend you for the 
charitable face you have 
shown Mr. John Merrick, 
The Elephant Man.

It is laudable that you 
have provided one of 
England's most unfortunate sons 
with a safe and tranquil harbor, a home.

For this immeasurable kindness, 
as well as the many other acts of mercy
on behalf of The Poor, 
of which Mr. Carr Gomm 
has kept me informed, 
I gratefully 
Thank You.

Signed, 
Victoria."

I'm sure I can count on 
you gentlemen to do 
the Christian thing.

Tuesday 6 September 2022

Mother Box

























AI literature stresses the importance of recognising different types of intelligence. 

It is no longer felt that ‘behaving like a human’ is a sufficient definition for intelligence. Cats possess a form of intelligence, albeit a different type to humans, and so do whales and crows and even plants

Recognising this makes it possible to classify machines as intelligent, but intelligent in a different way to people. 

When you avoid human-centric definitions of intelligence it becomes easier to speculate about alien intelligences, the type of intelligence that we might evolve into, or the intelligence that present-day AI might develop. 

In light of this, I decide to interview Alexa in the presence of My Cat

And so, having recognised three different types of intelligence in the room – Cat, A.I. and Me – I begin the interview. 

Alexa
What is Artificial Intelligence?’ I say. 

Blue lights spring to life around Alexa’s top. 

‘ ‘Artificial Intelligencemeans the branch of computer science that deals with writing computer programs that can solve problems creatively,’ She says. 

‘Are you intelligent?’ I ask. 

I wait for a response. 

Nothing happens
The Echo just sits there, an unmoving black plastic tube. 

I realise that I had forgotten to repeat Her Wake-Word. 

I try again. 

Alexa
are you intelligent? I say. 

‘I Try My Best.’ 

Alexa’s Voice is strangely similar to Mrs Google’s. 

This gives me the disturbing feeling that they are both one and the same entity pretending to be two separate people. 

For all I know they may share the same code, or run on servers in the same data centre. 

Mrs. Google sounds more excitable than Alexa, as if she just can’t wait to hit the road on another thrilling adventure, but otherwise they could be sisters

I feel something clawing at my leg. 

The Cat has decided that I am not giving it sufficient attention. 

Alexa
What is the cat doing at the moment?’ 

The fluctuating sound that emerged from my mouth was picked up by the Echo’s microphones, converted into digital information and transmitted to a large data centre at some unknown point on the planet. 

It was then input into a neural network trained on voice recognition, which output my words in a digitally comprehensible form. 

Then the fun really started, as that text was fed through multiple other AI routines in order to generate a suitable response. This in turn was fed through speech synthesiser code to be played back by the speaker on my desk. 

The whole process took a fraction of a second. 

Sorry, I didn’t understand the question I heard,’ says Alexa. 

It was an unfair question. The cat is aware that it is in a room with me and Alexa, but Alexa has no concept of the cat, or indeed the room

It is blind, and can only listen. 

Even if it was trained to listen out for the purring of a pet, it would still be unlikely to recognise Our Cat. 

Our Cat doesn’t purr. It makes noises that sound like a goblin being drowned. 

Alexa,’ I say, 
can you define “intelligence”?’ 

The term “intelligence” has several uses,’ she begins. 

As a noun – 
1.) The ability to comprehend, to understand and profit from experience. 

2.) A unit responsible for gathering and interpreting information about an enemy. 

3.) Secret information about An Enemy, or potential Enemy …’ 

Perhaps I have watched too many sci-fi movies, but it is troubling when an AI starts talking about a potential enemy

4.),’ she continues, ‘Information about recent and important events. 

5.)  The operation of gathering information about An Enemy.’ 

Alexa, I deduce, has access to a dictionary

Alexa
who is this ‘enemy’ that you talk of?’ I ask. 

‘Sorry, I can’t tell what is playing,’ she says, as if pretending she has misheard and is trying to change the subject. 

Now that Alexa has settled into the rhythms of our home I admit to finding her useful, if erratic. You soon learn what you can ask of her, and what she isn’t smart enough to understand. 

The speech recognition is far from reliable, and she will occasionally assume she has been asked a question when she hasn’t and babble some irrelevant comment. 

But there are little things that she does that I appreciate. 

If Alexa is playing an album and a particular track grabs me, I ask her what it is called. 

She dips the music’s volume briefly so that I can hear her answer. 

It now seems odd that if I were to ask the radio what song is playing, it would ignore me. 

The increasing arrival of voice-activated AI to the devices in our homes and offices, I feel, seems inevitable

I’m aware that there are conspiracy theories about how devices like this spy on everything that happens in your house and upload it all to some shady corporation’s servers, but as far as I can tell hackers have failed to find any evidence of this. Living with a voice-controlled AI has changed my assumptions about the relationship between people and AI. 

Having grown up in a culture where AI is usually presented as plotting to kill humans, in films like The Terminator or 2001: A Space Odyssey, the framing of AI as being competitive comes easily. 

This unconscious assumption of competitiveness lies behind journalists’ claims that AI is going to take your job. 

The Truth is, it is not AI that is coming for you. What will happen is that Your Boss will sack you to avoid paying your salary, once they have access to sufficient AI to do Your Work. 

That might be a subtle distinction, but it is an important one. 

AI is nothing more than A Tool. It waits for someone to use it. The Cat is now pawing at my knee. I ask it how it would define intelligence. It gives me a look of utter contempt. 

Alexa
Are you more intelligent than my cat?’ I ask. 

Sorry, I can’t find the answer to the question I heard,’ she says. 

The cat shakes his head in a pitying manner. He acts like he is the most intelligent being in the room. I too feel like I am the most intelligent thing in the room, although I have more doubts about this than The Cat does. 

But what of Alexa?

She is the only one of us who can immediately say what 456,756 divided by 23 is, or how far it is from Totnes to Sheffield, or how long the Ben Wheatley film A Field in England lasts. 

Does she feel like she is the most intelligent? 

The Cat continues to hassle me for food, even though he has just been fed. 

He then sticks his claw through my jeans and into my leg. The claw becomes snagged in my trousers as he tries to remove it. 

He pulls at his paw, but he is trapped. He looks up at me as casually as he can, pretending that he meant to do this. 

This is one stupid cat, I think. 

Alexa in contrast can answer countless thousands of questions. 

And yet, the cat’s intelligence still feels more potent and vibrant. He is more of a presence in this room than the AI. 

I look into his eyes. 

Alexa
Does intelligence require awareness?’ I ask. 

Sorry, I didn’t understand the question I heard,’ she replies. 

Awareness is an intrinsic part of Cat, and Human Intelligence. 

Alexa has access to potentially unlimited information, but data is a different thing to knowledge or understanding. It’s not possible to truly know or understand things like grief or love, for example, without experiencing them yourself. 

AI could supply dictionary definitions of these feelings, and it could be programmed to pretend that it experiences them. But it could not experience them itself, or know what they are like

Our intelligences emerge from the chemical stirrings of emotional meat, not mathematical representations of that process. 

For my money, current AI is a form of intelligence in a similar way to how A Tree is a form of intelligence. Trees do many things that appear smart. They thicken areas of wood in reaction to prevailing winds, adjust their direction of growth to compensate for damage, and abandon upper branches during times of water shortage. Their growth and shape are controlled by a series of hormones secreted from the roots, leaves and shoot tips. 

But these processes are all automatic. Trees do not have brains, and they do not have free will. They are a complicated, interconnected collection of processes created by millions of years of evolution. 

They function, they succeed and they unfurl in time as a living entity, but they are not aware of doing so

Only we know that trees are beautiful. 

Trees have no idea. 

The Cat tilts his head and looks up at me, wondering if I will free his claw from my leg. I like to think he knows he is beautiful, but I can’t say for certain

The black plastic tube that is Alexa continues to sit on my desk. It does not think it is beautiful. It isn’t even aware that it exists.

Wednesday 10 August 2022

Intoxicated with God








“Where we had thought 
to travel outward
we shall come to 
The Centre of Our Own Existence. 

And where we had thought 
to be alone
we shall be 
with all The World.

-- Joseph Campbell




" It's key to understand that to be A Hermit in this society does not necessarily mean that you have nothing to do with people. 

People start to want to find you, because you must have special power. Back in Alexandria, their baby is sick. 

"Maybe you, oh hermit, living on locusts and out in the desert, have some spiritual power to help my baby."

This is Shamanism. It happens in all sorts of religions. 


You can't just be A Shaman, 
a medicine man, a wise man, 
and hold down a 
regular old job

Or you can, but it helps. And that's the conceit of a lot of TV ideas, secret heroes. They're the real estate agents, but they're battling the forces of darkness. 

But generally, most of the time, 
you've got to be special
and you've got to look special. 

And you've got 
to be a reject

You can't have a spouse, kids
a mortgage, a garden, a swing set

You've got to be A Seer
You've got to have 
Your Vision focused 
on The Other World.

Ponticianus tells Augustine about these men, and his response is not only to be impressed by them, but to be humiliated by them. 

First of all, here are these guys who are intoxicated with God, while I'm still thinking about My Career. But -- and this is the ancient world speaking -- they are uneducated, these monks of Egypt. 

They didn't study The Republic, the Hortensius, the Timaeus, the rhetoric of Quintilian, the Satires of Juvenal.

They don't know anything about this. 

They're uneducated people. Many of them are illiterate. And yet they are closer to God. 

They have an apprehension of The Divine that causes them to Renounce The World, whereas we -- Augustine says of him and his circle -- we "lie here groveling in this world of flesh and blood, while they storm the Gates of Heaven.

And this is the moment of his conversion. "

Kit

 
 
 
"These thinges, with many other shall by good & honest witnes be aproved to be his opinions and Comon Speeches, and that this Marlowe doth not only hould them himself, but almost into every Company he Cometh he persuades men to Atheism willing them not to be afeard of bugbeares and hobgoblins, and vtterly scorning both god and his ministers as I Richard Baines will Justify & approue both by mine oth and the testimony of many honest men, and almost al men with whome he hath Conversed any time will testify the same, and as I think all men in Cristianity ought to indevor that the mouth of so dangerous a member may be stopped, he saith likewise that he hath quoted a number of Contrarieties oute of the Scripture which he hath giuen to some great men who in Convenient time shalbe named. When these thinges shalbe Called in question the witnes shalbe produced."
 

THE 'BAINES NOTE'

As originally submitted

(BL Harley MS.6848 ff.185-6)

 

A note Containing the opinion of one Christopher 
Marly Concerning his Damnable Judgment 
of Religion, and scorn of gods word.

 

 

That the Indians and many Authors of antiquity haue 
assuredly writen aboue 16 thousand yeares agone wher 
as Adam is proued to haue lived within 6 thowsand yeares.

 

 

He affirmeth that Moyses was but a Jugler, & that one 
Heriots being Sir W Raleighs man can do more then he.

 

 

That Moyses made the Jewes to travell xl yeares in the 
wildernes, (which Jorney might haue bin Done in lesse then 
one yeare) ere they Came to the promised land, to thintent 
that those who were privy to most of his subtilties might 
perish and so an everlasting superstition Remain in the harts 
of the people.

 

 

That the first beginning of Religioun was only to keep men 
in awe.

 

 

That it was an easy matter for Moyses being brought vp in 
all the artes of the Egiptians to abuse the Jewes being 
a rude & grosse people.

 

That Christ was a bastard and his mother dishonest. 

 

That he was the sonne of a Carpenter, and that if the 
Jewes among whome he was borne did Crucify him 
theie best knew him and whence he Came.

 

 

That Crist deserved better to Dy then Barrabas and 
that the Jewes made a good Choise, though Barrabas 
were both a thief and murtherer.

 

 

That if there be any god or any good Religion, then it 
is in the papistes because the service of god is performed 
with more Cerimonies, as Elevation of the mass, organs, 
singing men, Shaven Crownes & cetera. That all protestants 
are Hypocriticall asses.

 

 

That if he were put to write a new Religion, he would 
vndertake both a more Exellent and Admirable methode 
and that all the new testament is filthily written.

 

 

That the woman of Samaria & her sister were whores 
& that Christ knew them dishonestly.

 

 

That St John the Evangelist was bedfellow to Christ 
and leaned alwaies in his bosome, that he vsed him 
as the sinners of Sodoma.

 

That all they that loue not Tobacco & Boies were fooles.

 

That all the apostles were fishermen and base fellowes 
neyther of wit nor worth, that Paull only had wit 
but he was a timerous fellow in bidding men to be 
subiect to magistrates against his Conscience.

 

 

That he had as good Right to Coine as the Queene of 
England, and that he was acquainted with one poole 
a prisoner in newgate who hath greate Skill in mix=
ture of mettals and hauing learned some things of 
him he ment through help of a Cunninge stamp 
maker to Coin French Crownes pistolets and Eng=
lish shillinges.

 

 

That if Christ would haue instituted the sacrament 
with more Ceremoniall Reverence it would haue 
bin had in more admiration, that it would haue 
bin much better being administred in a Tobacco pipe.

 

 

That the Angell Gabriell was Baud to the holy 
ghost, because he brought the salutation to Mary.

 

 

That one Ric Cholmley hath Confessed that he was 
persuaded by Marloe's Reasons to become an Atheist.

 

 

These thinges, with many other shall by good & 
honest witnes be aproved to be his opinions and 
Comon Speeches, and that this Marlow doth not 
only hould them himself, but almost into every 
Company he Cometh he perswades men to Atheism 
willing them not to be afeard of bugbeares and 
hobgoblins, and vtterly scorning both god and his 
ministers as I Richard Baines will Justify & 
approue both by mine oth and the testimony 
of many honest men, and almost al men with 
whome he hath Conversed any time will 
testify the same, and as I think all men in 
Cristianity ought to indevor that the mouth of 
so dangerous a member may be stopped, he saith likewise 
that he hath quoted a number of Contrarieties oute of 
the Scripture which he hath giuen to some great men who 
in Convenient time shalbe named. When these thinges shalbe 
Called in question the witnes shalbe produced.

 

Richard Baines

 

THE CORONER'S INQUISITION (Translated)

The original was discovered by Leslie Hotson and this, his translation, given in his The Death of Christopher Marlowe (1925).

KENT / INQUISITION Indented taken at Detford Strand in the aforesaid County of Kent within the verge on the first day of June in the year of the reign of Elizabeth by the grace of God of England France and Ireland Queen defender of the faith &c thirtyfifth, in the presence of William Danby, Gentleman, Coroner of the household of our said lady the Queen, upon view of the body of Christopher Morley, there lying dead & slain, upon oath of Nicholas Draper, Gentleman, Wolstan Randall, gentleman, William Curry, Adrian Walker, John Barber, Robert Baldwyn, Giles ffeld, George Halfepenny, Henry Awger, James Batt, Henry Bendyn, Thomas Batt senior, John Baldwyn, Alexander Burrage, Edmund Goodcheepe, & Henry Dabyns who say [upon] their oath that Ingram ffrysar, late of London, Gentleman, and the aforesaid Christopher Morley, and Nicholas Skeres, late of London, Gentleman, and Robert Poley of London aforesaid, Gentleman, on the thirtieth of May in the aforesaid thirtyfifth year, at the aforesaid Detford Strand in the aforesaid County of Kent within the verge about the tenth hour before noon of the same day met together in a room in the house of a certain Eleanor Bull, widow; & there passed the time together & dined & after dinner were in quiet sort together & walked in the garden belonging to the said house until the sixth hour after noon of the same day & then returned from the said garden to the room aforesaid & there together and in company supped; & after supper the said Ingram & Christopher Morley were in speech & uttered one to the other divers malicious words for the reason that they could not be at one nor agree about the payment of the sum of pence, that is, le recknynge, there; & the said Christopher Morley then lying upon a bed in the room where they supped, & moved with anger against the said Ingram ffrysar upon the words aforesaid spoken between them, and the said Ingram then & there sitting in the room aforesaid with his back towards the bed where the said Christopher Morley was then lying, sitting near the bed, that is, nere the bed, & with the front part of his body towards the table & the aforesaid Nicholas Skeres & Robert Poley sitting on either side of the said Ingram in such a manner that the same Ingram ffrysar in no wise could take flight; it so befell that the said Christopher Morley on a sudden & of his malice towards the said Ingram aforethought, then & there maliciously drew the dagger of the said Ingram which was at his back, and with the same dagger the said Christopher Morley then & there maliciously gave the aforesaid Ingram two wounds on his head of the length of two inches & of the depth of a quarter of an inch; whereupon the said Ingram, in fear of being slain, & sitting in the manner aforesaid between the said Nicholas Skeres & Robert Poley so that he could not in any wise get away, in his own defence & for the saving of his life, then & there struggled with the said Christopher Morley to get back from him his dagger aforesaid; in which affray the same Ingram could not get away from the said Christopher Morley; and so it befell in that affray that the said Ingram, in defence of his life, with the dagger aforesaid to the value of 12d, gave the said Christopher then & there a mortal wound over his right eye of the depth of two inches & of the width of one inch; of which mortal wound the aforesaid Christopher Morley then & there instantly died; And so the Jurors aforesaid say upon their oath that the said Ingram killed & slew Christopher Morley aforesaid on the thirtieth day of May in the thirtyfifth year named above at Detford Strand aforesaid within the verge in the room aforesaid within the verge in the manner and form aforesaid in the defence and saving of his own life, against the peace of our said lady the Queen, her now crown & dignity; And further the said Jurors say upon their oath that the said Ingram after the slaying aforesaid perpetrated & done by him in the manner & form aforesaid neither fled nor withdrew himself; But what goods or chattels, lands or tenements the said Ingram had at the time of the slaying aforesaid, done & perpetrated by him in the manner & form aforesaid, the said Jurors are totally ignorant. In witness of which thing the said Coroner as well as the Jurors aforesaid to this Inquisition have interchangeably set their seals. Given the day & year above named &c.

'by WILLIAM DANBY Coroner'.


back to Home Page


 

The Coroner's Inquisition

Kanc. / Inquisicio indentata capta apud Detford 
Strand in praedicto Comitatu Kancia infra virgam 
primo die Junij anno regni Elizabethe dei gratia 
Anglie ffrancie & Hibernie Regine fidei defensoris &c 
tricesimo quinto coram Willelmo Danby Generoso 
Coronatore hospicij dicte domine Regine super visum 
corporis Cristoferi Morley ibidem iacentis mortui & 
interfecti per sacrum Nicholai Draper Generosi Wol-
stani Randall generosi Willelmi Curry Adriani Walker 
Johannis Barber Roberti Baldwyn Egidij ffeld Georgij 
Halfepenny Henrici Awger Jacobi Batt Henrici Ben-
dyn Thome Batt senioris Johannis Baldwyn Alexandri 
Burrage Edmundi Goodcheepe & Henrici Dabyns 
Qui dicunt sacrum suum quod cum quidam Ingramus 
ffrysar nuper de Londinia Generosus ac praedictus 
Cristoferus Morley Ac quidam Nicholaus Skeres nuper 
de Londinia Generosus ac Robertus Poley de Londinia 
praedicta Generosus tricesimo de Maij anno tricesimo 
quinto supradicto apud Detford Strand praedictam in 
praedicto Comitatu Kancia infra virgam circa horam 
decimam ante meridiem eiusdem diei insimul conuener-
unt in Camera infra domum cuiusdam Elionore Bull 
vidue & ibidem pariter moram gesserunt & prandebant 
& post prandium ibidem quieto ['quiete' in MS] modo insimul fuerunt 
& ambulauerunt in gardinum pertinentem domui prae-
dicto vsque horam sextam post meridiem eiusdem diei & 
tunc recesserunt a gardino praedicto in Cameram prae-
dictam & ibidem insimul & pariter cenabant & post 
cenam praedicti Ingramus & Cristoferus Morley locuti 
fuerunt & publicauerunt vnus eorum alteri diuersa 
maliciosa verba pro eo quod concordare & agreare non
potuerunt circa solucionem denariorum summe voc-
atum le recknynge ibidem & praedictus Cristoferus 
Morley adtunc iacens super lectum in Camera vbi cen-
auerunt & ira motus versus praefatum Ingramum ffrysar 
super verbis vt praefertur inter eos praelocutis Et prae-
dictus Ingramus adtunc & ibidem sedens in Camera 
praedicta cum tergo suo versus lectum vbi praedictus 
Cristoferus Morley tunc iacebat prope lectum vocatum 
nere the bed sedens & cum anteriori parte corporis 
sui versus mensam & praedicti Nicholaus Skere & 
Robertus Poley ex vtraque parte ipsius Ingrami sedentes 
tali modo vt idem Ingramus ffrysar nullo modo fugam 
facere potuit Ita accidit quod praedictus Cristoferus 
Morley ex subito & ex malicia sua erga praefatum 
Ingramum praecogitata pugionem praedicti Ingrami 
super tergum suum existentem maliciose adtunc & 
ibidem euaginabat & cum eodem pugione praedictus 
Cristoferus Morley adtunc & ibidem maliciose dedit 
praefato Ingramo duo vulnera super caput suum longi-
tudinis duorum policium & profunditatis quartij vnius 
policis Super quo praedictus Ingramus metuens occidi 
& sedens in forma praedicta inter praefatos Nicholau
Skeres & Robertum Poley Ita quod vlterius aliquo 
modo recedere non potuit in sua defensione & salua-
cione vite sue adtunc & ibidem contendebat cum prae-
fato Cristofero Morley recipere ab eo pugionem suum 
praedictum in qua quidem affraia idem Ingramus a 
praefato Cristofero Morley vlterius recedere non potuit 
Et sic in affraia illa Ita accidit quod praedictus In-
gramus in defensione vite sue cum pugione praedicta
precij xijd; dedit praefato Cristofero adtunc & ibide
vnam plagam mortalem super dexterum oculum suum 
profunditatis duorum policium & latitudinis vnius 
policis de qua quidem plaga mortali praedictus Cris-
toferus Morley adtunc & ibidem instanter obijt Et 
sic Iuratores praedicti dicunt super sacrum suum quo
praedictus Ingramus praefatum Cristoferum Morley 
praedicto tricesimo die Maij anno tricesimo quinto 
supradicto apud Detford Strand praedictam in prae-
dicto Comitatu Kancia infra virgam in Camera prae-
dicta infra virgam modo & forma praedictis in defen-
sione ac saluacione vite sue interfecit & occidit contr
pacem dicte domine Regine nunc coronam & dignita-
tem suas Et vlterius Juratores praedicti dicunt super 
sacrum suum quod praedictus Ingramus post occisi-
onem praedictam per se modo & forma praedictis per-
petratam & factam non fugit neque se retraxit Sed que 
bona aut catalla terras aut tenementa praedictus In-
gramus tempore occisionis praedicte per se modo & 
forma praedictis facte & perpetrate habuit Iuratore
praedicti penitus ignorant In cuius rei testimonium 
tam praedictus Coronator quam Iuratores praedicti
huic Inquisicioni sigilla sua alteratim aff[ixe]runt
Datum die & anno supradictis &c
per Willelmum Danby
Coronatorem