Wednesday 23 March 2016

The Jews From Peru

Adelma Marina Tapia Ruiz, of Pucallpa, Peru

Proudly Afro-Peruvian/Illicitly Azkhenazi-but-Ashmed American George Zimmerman


Elsa Cayat of Charlie Hebdo in Peru 2013


Misinformation.

A Depiction of the Spanish Inquisition - Misinformation.

Closer to the Truth.

Darkest Peru



Suriname - Jonestown v.3.11
(Note the road and inland waterway infrastructure (Lack of))


"Why don't you just go ahead and nationalise the damn oil company?

It's your country. David Rockefeller isn't the government"

Senator Robert F. Kennedy,
Addressing an audience in Peru

Peruvian mum of twins, Belgian law student among Brussels dead

Brussels (AFP) - They came from Peru, Morocco, North America and Europe, and their lives -- whether as a mother, civil servant, student or missionary -- were just as diverse.

This is the picture slowly emerging of those caught up in the airport and metro bomb attacks in Brussels on Tuesday, which killed 31 people and left 300 injured, 61 critically.

Belgian Foreign Minister Didier Reynders said around 40 nationalities were among the dead and wounded, reflecting the cosmopolitan nature of Brussels, Europe's symbolic capital.

They included citizens of Britain, Colombia, Ecuador, France, Germany, Hungary, Portugal, Romania, Spain and the United States.

Among the first fatalities named was Adelma Marina Tapia Ruiz, a 37-year-old woman from Pucallpa in the Peruvian Amazon, who had lived in Belgium for nine years.

She was killed in the two blasts at Brussels airport, where she had been about to travel to New York with her Belgian journalist husband Christophe Delcambe and their three-year-old twin daughters. 

The others survived the blast as the girls had run off and Delcambe had chased after them, though one of the girls was wounded by flying debris.

"They took away everything she wanted to do with her life," her brother Fernando Tapia told Peruvian media, after she was identified by the foreign ministry in Lima.

Tapia had studied as a chef and wanted to open a restaurant in Brussels, the family was quoted as saying. 

Doctor Muriel Brugmans, who treated her in hospital, said on Facebook: "Tonight I'm thinking very much about my patient, mother of two adorable little girls.

"She was... so worried for her daughters."

Who we?

Dr. Tony Martin - 
The Sephardic Jewish Role In The African Slave Trade to the Portuguese, Spanish and Dutch Empires in the New World

CHARLIE HEBDO AND PERU


Peruvian Jews represent an important part of the economics and politics of Peru.

Have the 'dead' Charlie Hebdo staff moved to Peru?

Sandra Barr has exposed: the Charlie Hebdo False Flag

1: If no Charlie Hebdo staff were actually killed in the false flag attack, then where are the alleged victims hiding?

On January 12, 2015, five days after the alleged attack, the UK Independent published a story about one of the alleged victims, Elsa Cayat.

Elsa is a Jewish psychiatrist and psychoanalyst.

Elsa Cayat in Peru 2013

The Independent mentioned that in the summer of 2014, Sophie traveled to Peru with Stephane Charbonnier, and other Charlie Hebdo journalists.


George Wolinski a cartoonist at Charlie Hebdo is Jewish.

According to the Independent:

"Never averse to investigating her own psyche, last summer Cayat flew with Charbonnier and other Charlie Hebdo contributors to Peru, with the intention of ingesting peyote."

Bernard Maris, a top economist, was a journalist at Charlie Hebdo.

Bernard Maris is a member of the Roger Leray freemason lodge in Paris (Grand Orient de France).

He taught microeconomics at the Central Bank of Peru.

Sandra Barr has exposed: the Charlie Hebdo False Flag

2. Addresses given for Charlie Hebdo


Entrance at 10 Rue Nicolas Appert

The address of the Charlie Hebdo office, on the day of the 'shootings', was said to be 10 Rue Nicolas Appert.

Apparently, there have never been any pictures of the Charlie Hebdo staff at 10 Rue Nicolas Appert.


The offices at 44 Rue Turbigo

The Charlie Hebdo staff had an office at 44 Rue Turbigo.

Most of the pictures of the staff were taken at 44 Rue Turbigo.


56-62 Boulevard Davout, after an alleged petrol bomb attack. Full details and photos of this false flag here: Sandra Barr has exposed: the Charlie Hebdo False Flag

Charlie Hebdo allegedly had an office at 56-62 Boulevard Davout.

In 2011, the alleged Charlie Hebdo offices at 56-62 Boulevard Davout were allegedly attacked with a petrol bomb.

Apparently, there have never been any pictures of the Charlie Hebdo staff at 56-62 Boulevard Davout.

26 Rue Serpollet

Reportedly, there was a Charlie Hebdo office at 26 Rue Serpollet.

In June 2014, a French blogger 'Mardi' published a post about Charlie Hebdo sharing the building at 26 Rue Serpollet with offices of the 'Prefecture de Police de Paris'.

Link
On this Paris business directory, the address of Charlie Hebdo (Charlie Hebdo Hara Kiri) was changed on 6 January2015, the day before the 'shootings'.

It would seem that the Charlie Hebdo address was changed, on various Paris business directory sites, on the day before the shooting of 6 January 2015.

The address was changed from Rue Serpollet to Rue Nicolas Appert.

It would appear that Charlie Hebdo was never located at either Boulevard Devout (petrol bombing), or 10 Rue Nicolas Appert (shooting), but, that these addresses were used to stage false flag events.

More documents on addresses here: Sandra Barr: the Charlie Hebdo False Flag

The deeply Satanic and anti-Christian Charlie Hebdo. Jesus sodomizing God.

3: The anti-Christian Charlie Hebdo sold very few copies, was deep in debt, and needed some publicity.

The Charlie Hebdo 'shootings' apparently led to Charlie Hebdo making €21 Million.

The 'non-sheep' have seen through the false-flag attack.

A French website called Panamza reported on (1) the crisis actor girlfriend of Charbonnier, Jeannette Bougrab, and (2) the 'murder' of the Police Inspector on the same day as the alleged attack and (3) the finances of Charlie Hebdo.

Link and Link

The Zionist Bernard Henri Levy reading the 2/11/11 issue of Charlie Hebdo.

4. Charlie Hebdo and the Zionist Agenda

 Charlie Hebdo published nothing that could have been considered offensive to Jews.

Sandra Barr: the Charlie Hebdo False Flag

Philippe Val was one of the creators of Charlie Hebdo.

In 2008 Val sacked the cartoonist Sine for making what he deemed an anti-Semitic comment in his column.



Charlie Hebdo's Charbonnier - mind control symbolism.

5. Je Suis Charlie Manson

An hour after the attack the Charlie Hebdo website went down, it was back up again and the home page displayed "JE SUIS CHARLIE".

Much more here: Sandra Barr has exposed: the Charlie Hebdo False Flag


..

~~~~~



Sword of Creation comments on PARIS PSYOP - INSIDE JOB - MOSSAD ATTACKS CHARLIE 

You're totally correct and here's proof:

1) France had just helped Muslims; as with The Masonic Norway attack this was the trigger! 

2) Hebdo reportedly owned by a Rothschild corp;

3) French investigating police chief suicided;

4) Date/name gematria has JEWISH MASONIC MAFIA written all over!

Cabala Numerology on the "CHARLIE HEBDO ATTACK" on "1/7/2015":

Chaldean: (Jewish-Masonic fingerprint)

Vowels-21(3) Masonic Favorite Number both 2+1(sex magic) and the "3"! 
Total-13(4) Anagram of Pi see:

1) Pi Basis of Judaism 

2) Weapons of Jewish MAFIA

Consonants-10(1) eloHIM 'gods'/phallus their favorite toy.

Pythagorean: (Jewish-Masonic fingerprint)

Vowels-21(3) eloHIM 'gods'/phallus their favorite toy.

Total-74(11) Does not boad well as its one from "Clocks strikes 12" ( Saturn reaper) 

Consonants-10(1) eloHIM 'gods'/phallus their favorite toy.

If you're in the UK or Sweden you'll want to see this video as you're marked with 9/11 style numerology for a 'fall'!

11-"does not boad well as that's one before the Saturn 12 reaper!

UK/Sweden flag falling (See 3 images/half way down blog page)

of the Boston Cabala Bombing Rituals that starred Solomon's Temple at the finish line!



As the murder trial for George Zimmerman begins, his father has released an emotional and highly unusual e-book, publicly opining on all aspects of the case. The book by Robert Zimmerman Sr., called “Florida v. Zimmerman: Uncovering the Malicious Prosecution of my Son, George” was released today on Amazon for $3.99.

The most striking chapter is called “Who Are The True Racists,” an apparent effort to rebut claims that his son’s actions were racially motivated.

Previously, Zimmerman Sr. “believed generally racism was a thing of the past.” He says that, personally, he hadn’t encountered much racism, even though his wife is Hispanic. But after his son shot and killed Trayvon Martin, however, Zimmerman learned that racism is “flourishing at the insistence of some in the African American Community.” He then goes on to list various black leaders and organizations that he believes are racist:
Congressional Black Caucus.“[A] pathetic, self-serving group of racists… advancing their purely racist agenda.” He later adds that “all members of Congress should be ashamed of the Congressional Black Caucus, as should be their constituents.” And finally: “They are truly a disgrace to all Americans.” 

The NAACP. “[S]imply promotes racism and hatred for their own, primarily finical, interests” and “without prejudice and racial divide, the NAACP would simply cease to exist.”

NAACP President Benjamin Jealous. “[W]hat I would expect of a racist.” 

Trayvon Martin’s funeral director. A “racial activist and former head of the local NAACP.”

Benjamin Crump, Natialie Jackson and Darrly Parks, attorneys for Travyon Martin’s family. “The scheme team.”

The National Basketball Players Association.

Black Chamber of Commerce.

National Association of Black Law Enforcement Officers.

National Black United Fund.

United Negro College Fund.

While stopping short of explicitly calling President Obama a racist, Zimmerman Sr. does say that Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder have “shamelessly” sought to exploit his son’s case “to obtain great advantage in the African-American community.

Zimmerman Sr. says that because of Holder’s decision to investigate whether Trayvon Martin’s death violated federal civil rights laws, the FBI did not have “adequate resources to investigate clearly identified potential terrorist [sic] in the Boston area.” 

Now, “tragically, we have suffered the consequences of Mr. Holder’s politically motivated decisions.”

The second statement, certainly,  represents something approaching the absolute truth of the matter, and the day that it ceases any longer to be the case cannot come a day too soon, when it does indeed it does  come, assuming it eventually actually will, given enough time;

The first statement though, were we to accept it to be true, we must first acknowledge the fact that the NAACP was from it's inception a Jewish organisation, founded by Jews, funded by Jews, administereed by Jews and conceived for the purpose of assissting the cause of Jewish acceptance, advancement and assimilation by White Anglo-Saxon American nativist institutions  - so, that being the case, what does that say, exactly...?




"The NAACP wants us all to become white by amalgamation, but they are not honest enough to come out with the truth. To be a Negro is no disgrace, but an honor, and we of the UNIA do not want to become white. We are proud and honorable. We love our race and respect and adore our mothers. We Negroes should be proud of our ancestry. God and Jesus Christ were black. Let us return to Motherland Africa and establish a nation strong enough to lend protection to the members of our race scattered all over the world."

- Marcus Garvey



 Mining the Golden Mountains of Suriname With An Ex-Rebel Leader

 Gold is everywhere in Suriname, from political power to what the locals wear on their fingers, the effects of gold mining seep into all aspects of society. The industry is a necessary source of income for many Surinamese, but it's also destroying the environment, bad for public health, and rife with corruption.

 

The USA / CIA had several plans for an invasion in Suriname to overthrow the Bouterse regime in the period 1982-1984. Lots more details on this can be found at the following link:http://blog.kareldonk.com/researchnot...

In the above video: Surinamese citizens ("Resistance Fighters" led by Roy Bottse) were trained in a secret camp in French Guyana by American Soldiers of Fortune (Dr. John and Boss). According to the US mercenaries, they were "retained by the Council for the Liberation of Suriname last year to prepare military options that would enable the council to regain their country from the dictator Bouterse."

THE BATTLE FOR SURINAME




In 1980, Desi Bouterse took power in Suriname in a military coup. 

He remained in power until about 1988. 

In 1999, a court in the Hague convicted Desi Bouterse in absentia for allegedly leading an international cocaine cartel. 


A photo of an armed woman from a Facebook page belonging to Stephanie Bouterse.

In 2010, Desi Bouterse was elected, by the parliament, to lead Suriname. 

A New York Times report stated that Desi Bouterse's election created "fears of a possible return to the time when Suriname, once a magnet for Western mercenaries and Colombian drug cartels, was renowned for its openness to criminal enterprise."



Suriname is a little country just above Brazil. 
The Dutch brought lots of Indonesians here as a sort of slave labour. 
Suriname exports aluminum, gold and oil
Roughly 70 percent of its population live below the poverty level.


France has a warrant out on Desi Bouterse on international drug smuggling charges, and U.S. diplomatic cables accuse him of narcotics trafficking. 

In Suriname, Desi Bouterse also faces charges for allegedly killing 15 of his political rivals in 1982. That case is still ongoing.
Facebook Photos Seem To Show Violent Life Of Suriname's Ruling ...


Dino Bouterse, reportedly a top drugs gangster. "Bouterse is a significant drug trafficker," says Derek Maltz, special agent-in-charge with the US Drug Enforcement Administration.

Desi has been friends with castro's Cuba.


Chinese President Xi Jinping meets with Surinamese President Desi Bouterse

China is giving Suriname aid and low-interest loans.

New York Times

Suriname has a Chinese population - about 10 percent of the population.


Desi is curently hosting the annual UNASUR summit for leaders of South American countries.

The UNASUR Summit has rejected the proposed U.S. attack on Syria


In late August 2013, Desi Bouterse's son, Dino, was arrested in Panama on US drug and weapon charges, and turned over to US agents.

Dino is the director of Suriname's anti-terrorism unit.

It looks like it's The CIA versus China for control of Suriname's wealth.

The Obama Doctrine : "Don't Do Stupid Shit".


"Who exactly is in the stupid-shit caucus? 
Who is pro–stupid shit?"

"The truth is, actually, Putin, in all of our meetings, is scrupulously polite, very frank. Our meetings are very businesslike. He never keeps me waiting two hours like he does a bunch of these other folks...

He’s constantly interested in being seen as our peer and as working with us, because he’s not completely stupid. He understands that Russia’s overall position in the world is significantly diminished."
Obama’s theory here is simple :
Ukraine is a core Russian interest but not an American one, so Russia will always be able to maintain escalatory dominance there.





Over the past year, John Kerry has visited the White House regularly to ask Obama to violate Syria’s sovereignty. On several occasions, Kerry has asked Obama to launch missiles at specific regime targets, under cover of night, to “send a message” to the regime. The goal, Kerry has said, is not to overthrow Assad but to encourage him, and Iran and Russia, to negotiate peace….Obama has steadfastly resisted Kerry’s requests, and seems to have grown impatient with his lobbying. In recent National Security Council meetings, Obama’s strategy was occasionally referred to as the “Tom Sawyer approach.” Obama’s view was that if Putin wanted to expend his regime’s resources by painting the fence in Syria, the U.S. should let him. By late winter, though, when it appeared that Russia was making advances in its campaign to solidify Assad’s rule, the White House began discussing ways to deepen support for the rebels, though the president’s ambivalence about more-extensive engagement remained.
Obama would say privately that the first task of an American president in the post-Bush international arena was “Don’t do stupid shit.” Obama’s reticence frustrated [Samantha] Power and others on his national-security team who had a preference for action. Hillary Clinton, when she was Obama’s secretary of state, argued for an early and assertive response to Assad’s violence. In 2014, after she left office, Clinton told me that “the failure to help build up a credible fighting force of the people who were the originators of the protests against Assad … left a big vacuum, which the jihadists have now filled.” When The Atlantic published this statement, and also published Clinton’s assessment that “great nations need organizing principles, and ‘Don’t do stupid stuff’ is not an organizing principle,” Obama became “rip-shit angry,” according to one of his senior advisers. The president did not understand how “Don’t do stupid shit” could be considered a controversial slogan. Ben Rhodes recalls that “the questions we were asking in the White House were ‘Who exactly is in the stupid-shit caucus? Who is pro–stupid shit?’?” The Iraq invasion, Obama believed, should have taught Democratic interventionists like Clinton, who had voted for its authorization, the dangers of doing stupid shit. (Clinton quickly apologized to Obama for her comments, and a Clinton spokesman announced that the two would “hug it out” on Martha’s Vineyard when they crossed paths there later.).
‘Friday, August 30, 2013[:] ….While the Pentagon and the White House’s national-security apparatuses were still moving toward war (John Kerry told me he was expecting a strike the day after his speech), the president had come to believe that he was walking into a trap—one laid both by allies and by adversaries, and by conventional expectations of what an American president is supposed to do. In Situation Room meetings that followed the attack on Ghouta, only the White House chief of staff, Denis McDonough, cautioned explicitly about the perils of intervention. John Kerry argued vociferously for action.”
[Samantha] Power sometimes argued with Obama in front of other National Security Council officials, to the point where he could no longer conceal his frustration. “Samantha, enough, I’ve already read your book,” he once snapped. …Biden, who ordinarily shared Obama’s worries about American overreach, argued passionately that “big nations don’t bluff.”
[Cameron of the UK and Saudi Ambassador Jubeir demanded an attack. But Germany’s Merkel was opposed and refused to take part. When the British House of Commons also refused to go along, Obama paused.]
Obama also shared with McDonough a long-standing resentment: He was tired of watching Washington unthinkingly drift toward war in Muslim countries. Four years earlier, the president believed, the Pentagon had “jammed” him on a troop surge for Afghanistan. Now, on Syria, he was beginning to feel jammed again.
The prime minister of France, Manuel Valls, told me that his government was already worried about the consequences of earlier inaction in Syria when word came of the stand-down. “By not intervening early, we have created a monster,” Valls told me. “We were absolutely certain that the U.S. administration would say yes. Working with the Americans, we had already seen the targets. It was a great surprise. If we had bombed as was planned, I think things would be different today.” The crown prince of Abu Dhabi, Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan, who was already upset with Obama for “abandoning” Hosni Mubarak, the former president of Egypt, fumed to American visitors that the U.S. was led by an “untrustworthy” president. The king of Jordan, Abdullah II—already dismayed by what he saw as Obama’s illogical desire to distance the U.S. from its traditional Sunni Arab allies and create a new alliance with Iran, Assad’s Shia sponsor—complained privately, “I think I believe in American power more than Obama does.” The Saudis, too, were infuriated. They had never trusted Obama—he had, long before he became president, referred to them as a “so-called ally” of the U.S. “Iran is the new great power of the Middle East, and the U.S. is the old,” Jubeir, the Saudi ambassador in Washington, told his superiors in Riyadh.
Amid the confusion, a deus ex machina appeared in the form of the Russian president, Vladimir Putin. At the G20 summit in St. Petersburg, which was held the week after the Syria reversal, Obama pulled Putin aside, he recalled to me, and told the Russian president “that if he forced Assad to get rid of the chemical weapons, that that would eliminate the need for us taking a military strike.” Within weeks, Kerry, working with his Russian counterpart, Sergey Lavrov, would engineer the removal of most of Syria’s chemical-weapons arsenal—a program whose existence Assad until then had refused to even acknowledge.
This was the moment the president believes he finally broke with what he calls, derisively, the “Washington playbook.” I have come to believe that, in Obama’s mind, August 30, 2013, was his liberation day, the day he defied not only the foreign-policy establishment and its cruise-missile playbook, but also the demands of America’s frustrating, high-maintenance allies in the Middle East—countries, he complains privately to friends and advisers, that seek to exploit American “muscle” for their own narrow and sectarian ends. By 2013, Obama’s resentments were well developed. He resented military leaders who believed they could fix any problem if the commander in chief would simply give them what they wanted, and he resented the foreign-policy think-tank complex. A widely held sentiment inside the White House is that many of the most prominent foreign-policy think tanks in Washington are doing the bidding of their Arab and pro-Israel funders. I’ve heard one administration official refer to Massachusetts Avenue, the home of many of these think tanks, as “Arab-occupied territory.” [Leon Panetta was another hawk.]
He described a relationship with Putin that doesn’t quite conform to common perceptions. I had been under the impression that Obama viewed Putin as nasty, brutish, and short. But, Obama told me, Putin is not particularly nasty. “The truth is, actually, Putin, in all of our meetings, is scrupulously polite, very frank. Our meetings are very businesslike. He never keeps me waiting two hours like he does a bunch of these other folks.” Obama said that Putin believes his relationship with the U.S. is more important than Americans tend to think. “He’s constantly interested in being seen as our peer and as working with us, because he’s not completely stupid. He understands that Russia’s overall position in the world is significantly diminished. 
Obama’s theory here is simple: Ukraine is a core Russian interest but not an American one, so Russia will always be able to maintain escalatory dominance there.
Right after Obama’s reversal, Hillary Clinton said privately, “If you say you’re going to strike, you have to strike. There’s no choice.”
Here is Prince Turki’s attempted defense of the Kingdom:
‘A top Saudi Arabian intelligence chief said on Monday that President Barack Obama failed to appreciate all that the kingdom has done to stabilize the Middle East, fight terrorism and support American priorities, hitting back after the president called Middle Eastern governments “free riders” on US initiatives. “You accuse us of fomenting sectarian strife in Syria, Yemen and Iraq,” Turki al-Faisal, a Saudi prince and former ambassador to the United States and Britain, wrote in an open letter published Monday in the English-language Arab News. “You add insult to injury by telling us to share our world with Iran, a country that you describe as a supporter of terrorism.” Al-Faisal’s letter was a response to comments Obama made in a much-discussed interview with The Atlantic magazine in which Obama referred to the Saudis and other allies as “free riders” who push the United States to act but contribute little themselves. Obama has long been cooler toward the Saudis and other Arab allies than his predecessor, but his willingness to forcefully criticize them stunned many in Washington’s foreign policy establishment.’