Showing posts with label Orion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Orion. Show all posts

Wednesday 31 March 2021

There Was a Fine Young King.

 


There was a Fine Young King. He was vigorous, strong, and a good man in every respect. 

He loved to hunt, and one day he was hunting deer on horseback with his courtiers. 

In Indian mythology, The Call of The Inner World, The Call of The Unconscious, is often portrayed as a deer that is tantalizingly close but eludes being caught. 

The King and his courtiers were galloping along when the King saw a deer just out of bow-and-arrow range. 

He veered off and began following it, but the miraculous deer kept just outside his range. 

The King went plunging further and further into the forest, chasing the deer all day, so intent was he, in his masculine vigor, to catch this prized animal. 

By late afternoon, the King was irretrievably lost, and the deer had vanished. 

What a wonderful deer. 

He gets you where you need to go and then leaves you. 

The King was exhausted and rather frightened, as he was now separated from his courtiers. 

Being a wise young man, he got off his horse and sat down. 

If you don’t know What to Do, 

sit quietly, until your wits come back.

 

Suddenly he heard a beautiful song. A maiden was singing as he had never heard before, and he fell in love with her very voice. He got up, began to walk toward the sound, and soon came upon her. The maiden was as lovely as her voice, and the King, overwhelmed by her beauty, instantly lost his heart to her. 

 

He asked, “Are you married?” and the maiden said, “No.” The King said, “Will you be my queen?” and the maiden replied, “You must ask my father.” So he asked her to take him to her father, and she did. 

 

The father, himself a wise man, was delighted at the prospect of having a king for a son-in-law, but he didn’t let his enthusiasm appear too obvious. So he said, “You may have my daughter as your wife under one condition. She must never see water.” If you replace the word water with the wordreality, you will understand this story easily. The King agreed, and the young couple married. But there was one problem—keeping the Queen from seeing water. 

 

Avoiding Reality The King did his best to arrange for the Queen to see no water, but the task was more difficult than he anticipated. The palace was located right along the river that ran through the royal city. So the King ordered the royal laborers to build a brick wall alongside the river. Before he would take the Queen outdoors or up to the palace roof, he also had to be careful that there was no rain on the horizon. In fact, the King spent almost all his time arranging things so the Queen would not see water, and he did little else. The kingdom was going to seed, as he wasn’t per- forming most of his kingly duties. 

 

Finally, one day, the courtiers cornered him and said, “You never meet with us. You’re not managing the kingdom.” And the King said, “I have no time. Go away.” The head courtier, seeing that the kingdom was in dire straits and that there was no use asking the King again, as he was out of his mind, went to the servants and asked, “How does the palace work? What do you do?” The servants told him, “We spend all our time making sure the Queen does not see water.” 

 

What is this myth telling us? The King is in the throes of the forward-looking possibility, but his newfound love, who would fill his heart and bring him all the legitimate happiness in the world, has a condition laid upon her—that she must never be subjected to reality. Every love affair, every Stardust romance, carries this prohibition. It will work as long as you don’t subject it to reality, as long as it doesn’t come down to ordinary everydayness. If ordinary everydayness— water, in the symbolism of the story—ever douses this fallen-in-love quality, the feeling dis- solves instantly. That is the story of romantic love. 

 

The head courtier came to the King and said, “Sire, let us make a garden on the rooftop. We can plant trees and beautiful plants and put a roof over it, so that even if it rains, there will be no difficulty. You and the Queen can spend time in the gar- den and be happy.” They did, and it was a success.

 

Contact with Reality

One day the courtier asked, “Sire, are you not thirsty for the sight of water?”

 

And the King admitted, “I’m parched, but I don’t dare pursue my wish or The Queen will be in trouble.”

 

So the courtier suggested, “Your Majesty, I can build a fountain in the middle of the garden and surround it with greenery so thick that the Queen will never see it.

You can gaze upon the fountain in private and be refreshed.”

It was done. The King went regularly to the fountain and he was pleased. 

 

Then, one day, inevitably, the Queen happened upon the fountain. She was delighted for an instant, and then she vanished.

Our idealism, our noble motives, our loftiest intuitions perish at their first contact with reality.

The Queen disappeared, and the King was consumed with loneliness. Everything he wanted in The World, and he’d had a touch of it, was gone.

He could not eat or drink. Nothing could assuage his loneliness. 

 

The courtiers tried to cheer him up. They gave him the best of everything.

But when someone is in the throes of that kind of loneliness, he is inconsolable. Nothing anyone can do, no possessions, no amount of money, fame, or entertainment can break through that loneliness.

We have seen something that we are not yet able to encompass, and it is snatched away.

This is the cruelest loneliness of all.

 

The King was in the level of Hell that is frozen over, and no one knew what to do.

It had never happened before, and they didn’t have a cure for it.

Then one wise man observed that when The Queen vanished, a small frog had appeared in the roof garden beside the fountain.

He didn’t know what it meant, but he had seen it.

The King heard about the frog at The Fountain and went up to The Garden and smashed it flat with his own hands.

Then he declared that all the frogs in The Kingdom were to be killed.

For weeks, peasants trudged toward the palace with sacks of dead frogs to collect their bounties. Thousands and thousands of frogs were killed, and The Kingdom was spending all its time and energy killing frogs and carrying them to the royal palace.

The King had all the frogs killed because he thought the frog was, in some way, responsible for the disappearance of His Queen.

That’s a strange symptom of loneliness.

We self-perpetuate our loneliness, killing every frog we see. 

 

Finally, one day, The Frog King came to see The King,

and he said,

“Your Majesty, you are about to exterminate my entire species.

I am The Father of Your Queen.

She returned to the land of the frogs when you broke your vow.”

 

The King listened.

He liked the Frog King and made peace with him.

 

As a result, The Frog King brought his daughter, the little frog by the fountain, back to life.

Here was the Queen in all her splendor. The King embraced her and was happy again.

And the Queen was no longer compelled to stay away from water.

 

Transformation and Redemption

This Myth of the King and His Frog Queen is a story of Transformation and Redemption.

If you’re caught in the kind of loneliness that has no comfort and cannot be assuaged, and you can hear the wisdom of this story, it will help.

 

This is how to get through the second kind of loneliness.

 

If you have touched something of Heaven, something that was given to you miraculously but is not yet ready for contact with reality, when reality touches it — and inevitably it will — The Dream will vanish and your loneliness will return worse than before.

You must touch the inner world and learn to bear the sight of water without going to pieces.

When you restore your connection to the unconscious, to spirit, your beloved will come back cured of her reality phobia. 

 

Both the King and the Queen had learned to live without Water, Reality.

But the King couldn’t stand it, or maybe it was the Queen who couldn’t stand it.

No relationship can survive unless it includes Reality, Water.

Many fine, spiritually evolved people are at the tenuous stage where they’ve had a sublime vision, but if any water gets on it, it vanishes.

The King on his heroic journey, and all heroes, are the ones who suffer most. 

 

At some time in every relationship, every man or woman wonders: When did my partner turn into a frog? Whether you get through this crisis hinges on your ability to see the divine.

At first, we fail.

The King marries the Queen, and you might hope the story will end with them living happily ever after. But they can’t take it. Every marriage replays this scene, and the marriage can dissolve at this point. She turns into a frog. He turns into a boar. They are unable to sustain the heavenly vision that started it all. The frog needs water. 

 

The bliss you experience at the beginning of your marriage is true, but you can- not stand it. If you hang on and go through the dry time — without water — the glory of your first meeting will return, less fragile this time.

But you have to persist to be able to touch the bliss of Heaven and the trials of ordinary life.

 

The Nearness of God

 

The third kind of loneliness is the most subtle and difficult.

It is the loneliness of being dangerously close to God.

The proximity of God is always registered first as extreme pain.

To be near it yet unable to touch the thing you want most is unendurable.

A medieval proverb says, “The only cure for loneliness is aloneness.”

 

In the Western world, loneliness has reached its peak.

The old ways that used to protect us have worn thin.

We’re at the point where The King has killed the frog, and we feel perpetual, incurable loneliness.

When we’re in this kind of pain, we cry out to be freed from our suffering.

But when our understanding deepens, we go off somewhere, sit still, and determine not to move until the dilemma is resolved.

For some time, the journey is hellish.

I don’t know whether it’s possible for us to get through this stage more quickly or if it is a set path we have to traverse at its own pace, not ours. 

 

When we are able to move from solitude to vision, redemption takes place and loneliness vanishes — not because it gets filled, but because it was illusory in the first place.

It could never be filled.

A new kind of consciousness arises that does not find the immanence of God unendurable. There never was anywhere to go outwardly. But there is a lot to do inwardly.

The change of consciousness that turns Loneliness into Solitude is genius.

Each time the handless maiden comes to a crisis, she goes to The Forest in Solitude.

This is especially powerful in a woman’s way. It is the feminine spirit.

 

Solitude and Community

As an intuitive introvert, I rarely feel lonely when I’m alone.

When I was in my early twenties, I took a job in a lookout tower, fire-watching in the forest. I was alone on a mountain peak for four months, and I never felt lonely.

Reality didn’t catch me there. I was not in danger of my Queen leaving me.

But the moment I returned to civilization, loneliness descended on me like a landslide.

How could I be so happy on the mountaintop and then rubbed so raw when I came back down?

I didn’t want to live my whole life on a mountaintop — I’m not a Hermit.

I had to go back and forth, as the King did, until the visionary life could finally stand the impact of The Water of Reality.

 

The Queen in me had to learn to withstand the water. It’s a process. I believe that everyone who has touched the realm of spirit has had to go through this antechamber. 

 

If you’re honest and perceptive, you can tell the difference between regressive loneliness, the first kind, and the ineffable second and third types of loneliness, where you sense and then see what you cannot yet have.

The second and third types of loneliness are nearly indistinguishable.

If you can say exactly what you are lonely for, it will reveal a lot.

Do you want to go back where you came from, to the good old days?

Or have you seen a vision you can’t live without?

They’re as different as backward and forward. 

 

Dr. Jung said that every person who came into his consulting room was either twenty-one or forty-five, no matter their chronological age.

The twenty-one-year-old is looking backward and must conquer it.

The forty-five-year-old is being touched by something he cannot yet endure.

These are the only two subjects of therapy. 

 

Solitude 

 

The Garden of Eden and the heavenly Jerusalem are the same place, depending on whether you are looking backward or forward.

A person touched by loneliness is a holy person.

He is caught in the development of individuation.

Whether it’s a development or a regression depends on what he does with it. Loneliness can destroy you, or it can fire you up for a Dante-like journey through Hell and Purgatory to find paradise.

 

St. John of the Cross called this The Dark Night of the Soul. 

 

The worst suffering I’ve ever experienced has been loneliness, the kind that feels as though it has no cure, that nothing can touch it.

 

One day, at the midpoint in my life — a little like Dante — I got so exhausted from it that I went into my bedroom, lay face down on my bed, and said, “I’m not going to move until this is resolved.”

I stayed a long time, and the loneliness did ease a little.

Dante fell out of Hell, shimmied down the hairy leg of the Devil,

went through The Center of The World, and started up the other side, which was Purgatory.

I felt better, but as soon as I got up and began to do anything, my loneliness returned.

I made many round trips until gradually an indescribable quality began to suffuse my life, and loneliness loosened its grip.

Nothing outside changed. The change was entirely inside

 

Thomas Merton wrote a beautiful treatise on solitude :

 

He said that certain individuals are obliged to bear The Solitude of God.

Solitude is loneliness evolved to the next level of reality. He who is obliged to bear the solitude of God should not be asked to do anything else; it’s such a difficult task.

For monastics, solitude was one of the early descriptions of God. If you can transform your loneliness into solitude, you’re one step away from the most precious of all experiences. 

 

This is The Cure for Loneliness.

Thursday 25 March 2021

The Cowboy



“We are all the beneficiaries 
Of those who've gone before us-- 
Who've worked, who've fought, on occasion who have caredimmensely to the very depth of their soul, to achieve Liberty. 

If we really want to know Her, 
in the beginning should be the question :

"What is Liberty?" 







I was involved with "cowboy diplomacy", as you describe it, 

long before you were born.


-- Ambassador Spock




Commander Geordi LAFORGE :

Captain Scott — I've tried to be patient, I've tried to be polite. 


But I've got a job to do here, and quite frankly — 

you're in the way



Captain Montgomery SCOTT

Scotty : 

I was driving starships 

while your great-grandfather was still in diapers


I'd think you'd be a little grateful for a some help. 


I'll leave ye to work, Mister La Forge


*****


Captain J-L PICARD :

You’re a Starfleet Officer — 

You have a Duty!


Captain James Tiberius Kirk :

I don’t need to be lectured by you — 


I was out Saving The Galaxy 

when Your Grandfather was in Diapers!


And to be honest.... 

The Galaxy owes me one!



The Cowboy


Adam Kesher :
Cowboy! 

The Cowboy :
Howdy! 

Adam Kesher :
Howdy to you. 


The Cowboy :
Beautiful evening. 

Adam Kesher :
Yeah.


The Cowboy :
Sure want to thank ya 
for coming all theway up to see me...
 from that nice hotel Downtown. 

Adam Kesher :
No problem. 
What's on your mind?. 


The Cowboy :
Well now, here's A Man who wants to get right down to it. 
Kinda anxious to get to it are ya? 

Adam Kesher :
Whatever. 


The Cowboy :
A Man's Attitude... 
 
A Man's Attitude, 
goes some ways --
The Way His Life will be.
 
Is that somethin' you might agree with? 

Adam Kesher :
Sure....!


The Cowboy :
Now... 

Did you answer because you thought 
That's What I Wanted to Hear... 
or did you think about What I Said,
and answer 'cause 
You Truly Believe That to be Right

Adam Kesher :
I agree with What You Said... 

Truly


The Cowboy :
What'd I Say..? 

Adam Kesher :
That A Man's Attitude 
Determinesto a Large Extent 
How His Life Will Be. 


The Cowboy :
So, since you agree... 
You must be A Person
Who Does Not Care about The Good Life. 

Adam Kesher :
How's that? 


The Cowboy :
Well, stop for a little second and think about it. 
Can you do that for me? 

Adam Kesher :
Okay, I'm thinking. 


The Cowboy :
No. You're not thinkin'.
 
You're too busy being a smart aleck to be thinkin'.
 
Now I want ya to think, 
and stop bein' a smart aleck. 

Can you try that for me? 

Adam Kesher :
Look ... where's This going? 
What do you want me to do? 


The Cowboy :
There's sometimes A Buggy. 
How many drivers does A Buggy have? 

Adam Kesher :
One. 


The Cowboy :
So let's just say I'm drivin' This Buggy... 
and you, if fix your attitude
You can Ride Along with Me. 

Adam Kesher :
Okay. 


The Cowboy :
I want you to go Back to Work tomorrow.
 
You were re-casting the lead actress anyway... 
audition many girls for the part.
 
When you see The Girl that was shown to you 
earlier today, you will say: 

This is The Girl. 

The rest of the cast can stay. 
That is up to you. 
But that lead girl is not up to you. 

Now, you will see me one more time if you do Good. 
You will see me two more times if you do Bad. 

Adam Kesher :
Good Night. 


"For me, it's about going back to what the hell happened to this guy. 

He gets this ring, he's adopted into 
an interplanetary Police Force, 
and basically all his relationships fall apart and he can't hold down a job.

But he happens to be 
The Greatest Cosmic Cop of All.

We loved the disconnect of that :
the beatnik idea of how Hal Jordan has no home, he sleeps on friends couches, he travels with nothing but 
His Lantern and A Rucksack.

He's like A Cowboy trying to survive in the 21st Century."



"It's freedom to be oneself -- 
To do what one wants to do, 
To remain oneself for as long 
as one chooses to.

And basically, 
that's all

It's not Happiness
it's not Responsibility
it's not Truth

It's just being oneself."




Thursday 21 January 2021

There Was a Fine Young King.



There was a Fine Young King. He was vigorous, strong, and a good man in every respect. 

He loved to hunt, and one day he was hunting deer on horseback with his courtiers. 

In Indian mythology, The Call of The Inner World, The Call of The Unconscious, is often portrayed as a deer that is tantalizingly close but eludes being caught. 

The King and his courtiers were galloping along when the King saw a deer just out of bow-and-arrow range. 

He veered off and began following it, but the miraculous deer kept just outside his range. 

The King went plunging further and further into the forest, chasing the deer all day, so intent was he, in his masculine vigor, to catch this prized animal. 

By late afternoon, the King was irretrievably lost, and the deer had vanished. 

What a wonderful deer. 

He gets you where you need to go and then leaves you. 

The King was exhausted and rather frightened, as he was now separated from his courtiers. 

Being a wise young man, he got off his horse and sat down. 

If you don’t know What to Do, 

sit quietly, until your wits come back.


Suddenly he heard a beautiful song. A maiden was singing as he had never heard before, and he fell in love with her very voice. He got up, began to walk toward the sound, and soon came upon her. The maiden was as lovely as her voice, and the King, overwhelmed by her beauty, instantly lost his heart to her. 


He asked, “Are you married?” and the maiden said, “No.” The King said, “Will you be my queen?” and the maiden replied, “You must ask my father.” So he asked her to take him to her father, and she did. 


The father, himself a wise man, was delighted at the prospect of having a king for a son-in-law, but he didn’t let his enthusiasm appear too obvious. So he said, “You may have my daughter as your wife under one condition. She must never see water.” If you replace the word water with the wordreality, you will understand this story easily. The King agreed, and the young couple married. But there was one problem—keeping the Queen from seeing water. 


Avoiding Reality The King did his best to arrange for the Queen to see no water, but the task was more difficult than he anticipated. The palace was located right along the river that ran through the royal city. So the King ordered the royal laborers to build a brick wall alongside the river. Before he would take the Queen outdoors or up to the palace roof, he also had to be careful that there was no rain on the horizon. In fact, the King spent almost all his time arranging things so the Queen would not see water, and he did little else. The kingdom was going to seed, as he wasn’t per- forming most of his kingly duties. 


Finally, one day, the courtiers cornered him and said, “You never meet with us. You’re not managing the kingdom.” And the King said, “I have no time. Go away.” The head courtier, seeing that the kingdom was in dire straits and that there was no use asking the King again, as he was out of his mind, went to the servants and asked, “How does the palace work? What do you do?” The servants told him, “We spend all our time making sure the Queen does not see water.” 


What is this myth telling us? The King is in the throes of the forward-looking possibility, but his newfound love, who would fill his heart and bring him all the legitimate happiness in the world, has a condition laid upon her—that she must never be subjected to reality. Every love affair, every Stardust romance, carries this prohibition. It will work as long as you don’t subject it to reality, as long as it doesn’t come down to ordinary everydayness. If ordinary everydayness— water, in the symbolism of the story—ever douses this fallen-in-love quality, the feeling dis- solves instantly. That is the story of romantic love. 


The head courtier came to the King and said, “Sire, let us make a garden on the rooftop. We can plant trees and beautiful plants and put a roof over it, so that even if it rains, there will be no difficulty. You and the Queen can spend time in the gar- den and be happy.” They did, and it was a success. Contact with Reality One day the courtier asked, “Sire, are you not thirsty for the sight of water?” And the King admitted, “I’m parched, but I don’t dare pursue my wish or the Queen will be in trouble.” So the courtier suggested, “Your Majesty, I can build a fountain in the middle of the garden and surround it with greenery so thick that the Queen will never see it. You can gaze upon the fountain in private and be refreshed.” It was done. The King went regularly to the fountain and he was pleased. 


Then, one day, inevitably, the Queen happened upon the fountain. She was de- lighted for an instant, and then she vanished. Our idealism, our noble motives, our loftiest intuitions perish at their first contact with reality. The Queen disappeared, and the King was consumed with loneliness. Everything he wanted in the world, and he’d had a touch of it, was gone. He could not eat or drink. Nothing could assuage his loneliness. 


The courtiers tried to cheer him up. They gave him the best of everything. But when someone is in the throes of that kind of loneliness, he is inconsolable. Noth- ing anyone can do, no possessions, no amount of money, fame, or entertainment can break through that loneliness. We have seen something that we are not yet able to encompass, and it is snatched away. This is the cruelest loneliness of all. The King was in the level of Hell that is frozen over, and no one knew what to do. It had never happened before, and they didn’t have a cure for it. Then one wise man observed that when the Queen vanished, a small frog had appeared in the roof garden beside the fountain. He didn’t know what it meant, but he had seen it. The King heard about the frog at the fountain and went up to the garden and smashed it flat with his own hands. Then he declared that all the frogs in the king- dom were to be killed. For weeks, peasants trudged toward the palace with sacks of dead frogs to collect their bounties. Thousands and thousands of frogs were killed, and the kingdom was spending all its time and energy killing frogs and carrying them to the royal palace. The King had all the frogs killed because he thought the frog was, in some way, responsible for the disappearance of his queen. That’s a strange symptom of loneliness. We self-perpetuate our loneliness, killing every frog we see. 


Finally, one day, the Frog King came to see the King, and he said, “Your Majesty, you are about to exterminate my entire species. I am the father of your queen. She returned to the land of the frogs when you broke your vow.” The King listened. He liked the Frog King and made peace with him. As a result, the Frog King brought his daughter, the little frog by the fountain, back to life. Here was the Queen in all her splendor. The King embraced her and was happy again. And the Queen was no longer compelled to stay away from water. Transformation and Redemption This myth of the King and his Frog Queen is a story of transformation and redemp- tion. If you’re caught in the kind of loneliness that has no comfort and cannot be assuaged, and you can hear the wisdom of this story, it will help. This is how to get through the second kind of loneliness. If you have touched something of Heaven, something that was given to you miraculously but is not yet ready for contact with reality, when reality touches it—and inevitably it will—the dream will vanish and your loneliness will return worse than before. You must touch the inner world and learn to bear the sight of water without going to pieces. When you restore your connection to the unconscious, to spirit, your beloved will come back cured of her reality phobia. 


Both the King and the Queen had learned to live without water, reality. But the King couldn’t stand it, or maybe it was the Queen who couldn’t stand it. No rela- tionship can survive unless it includes reality, water. Many fine, spiritually evolved people are at the tenuous stage where they’ve had a sublime vision, but if any water gets on it, it vanishes. The King on his heroic journey, and all heroes, are the ones who suffer most. 


At some time in every relationship, every man or woman wonders: When did my partner turn into a frog? Whether you get through this crisis hinges on your ability to see the divine. At first, we fail. The King marries the Queen, and you might hope the story will end with them living happily ever after. But they can’t take it. Every marriage replays this scene, and the marriage can dissolve at this point. She turns into a frog. He turns into a boar. They are unable to sustain the heavenly vision that started it all. The frog needs water. 


The bliss you experience at the beginning of your marriage is true, but you can- not stand it. If you hang on and go through the dry time— without water— the glory of your first meeting will return, less fragile this time. But you have to persist to be able to touch the bliss of Heaven andthe trials of ordinary life. The Nearness of God The third kind of loneliness is the most subtle and difficult. It is the loneliness of being dangerously close to God. The proximity of God is always registered first as extreme pain. To be near it yet unable to touch the thing you want most is unen- durable. A medieval proverb says, “The only cure for loneliness is aloneness.” In the Western world, loneliness has reached its peak. The old ways that used to protect us have worn thin. We’re at the point where the King has killed the frog, and we feel perpetual, incurable loneliness. When we’re in this kind of pain, we cry out to be freed from our suffering. But when our understanding deepens, we go off somewhere, sit still, and determine not to move until the dilemma is resolved. For some time, the journey is hellish. I don’t know whether it’s possible for us to get through this stage more quickly or if it is a set path we have to traverse at its own pace, not ours. 


When we are able to move from solitude to vision, redemption takes place and loneliness vanishes—not because it gets filled, but because it was illusory in the first place. It could never be filled. A new kind of consciousness arises that does not find the immanence of God unendurable. There never was anywhere to go outwardly. But there is a lot to do inwardly. The change of consciousness that turns loneliness into solitude is genius. Each time the handless maiden comes to a crisis, she goes to the forest in solitude. This is especially powerful in a woman’s way. It is the feminine spirit. Solitude and Community As an intuitive introvert, I rarely feel lonely when I’m alone. When I was in my early twenties, I took a job in a lookout tower, fire-watching in the forest. I was alone on a mountain peak for four months, and I never felt lonely. Reality didn’t catch me there. I was not in danger of my Queen leaving me. But the moment I returned to civilization, loneliness descended on me like a landslide. How could I be so happy on the mountaintop and then rubbed so raw when I came back down? I didn’t want to live my whole life on a mountaintop—I’m not a hermit. I had to go back and forth, as the King did, until the visionary life could finally stand the impact of the water of reality. The Queen in me had to learn to withstand the water. It’s a process. I believe that everyone who has touched the realm of spirit has had to go through this antechamber. 


If you’re honest and perceptive, you can tell the difference between regressive loneliness, the first kind, and the ineffable second and third types of loneliness, where you sense and then see what you cannot yet have. The second and third types of loneliness are nearly indistinguishable. If you can say exactly what you are lonely for, it will reveal a lot. Do you want to go back where you came from, to the good old days? Or have you seen a vision you can’t live without? They’re as different as backward and forward. 


Dr. Jung said that every person who came into his consulting room was either twenty-one or forty-five, no matter their chronological age. The twenty-one-year-old is looking backward and must conquer it. The forty-five-year-old is being touched by something he cannot yet endure. These are the only two subjects of therapy. 


Solitude 


The Garden of Eden and the heavenly Jerusalem are the same place, depending on whether you are looking backward or forward. A person touched by loneliness is a holy person. He is caught in the development of individuation. Whether it’s a development or a regression depends on what he does with it. Loneliness can destroy you, or it can fire you up for a Dante-like journey through Hell and Purgatory to find paradise. St. John of the Cross called this the Dark Night of the Soul. 


The worst suffering I’ve ever experienced has been loneliness, the kind that feels as though it has no cure, that nothing can touch it. One day, at the midpoint in my life—a little like Dante—I got so exhausted from it that I went into my bed- room, lay face down on my bed, and said, “I’m not going to move until this is re- solved.” I stayed a long time, and the loneliness did ease a little. Dante fell out of Hell, shimmied down the hairy leg of the Devil, went through the center of the world, and started up the other side, which was Purgatory. I felt better, but as soon as I got up and began to do anything, my loneliness returned. I made many round trips until gradually an indescribable quality began to suffuse my life, and lone- liness loosened its grip. Nothing outside changed. The change was entirely inside. 


Thomas Merton wrote a beautiful treatise on solitude. He said that certain individuals are obliged to bear the solitude of God. Solitude is loneliness evolved to the next level of reality. He who is obliged to bear the solitude of God should not be asked to do anything else; it’s such a difficult task. For monastics, solitude was one of the early descriptions of God. If you can transform your loneliness into solitude, you’re one step away from the most precious of all experiences. 


This is The Cure for Loneliness.

Monday 11 January 2021

Mental Gender






Emblema XLIX. 
Infans Philosophicus tres agnoscit patres, ut Orion. 
‘Like Orion, the Philosophick Child acknowledges thee fathers.’ 

Mythographers relate that Orion had not one but three fathers

 
  Most accounts tell how Jupiter, Mercury, and Neptune granted the wish of their host Hyrieus to give him a son. 

Accordingly, the gods urinated in the skin of a heifer which was then buried. 
Nine months later, Orion (the name is a pun on the Greek ouron, urine) was born. 

Here, Maier names Orion’s fathers as 
Apollo, Vulcan, and Mercury
but, as usual, circumstances contrary to nature 
must in alchemy be understood to be the cloak of hermetick allegory

The Stone’s first father is Apollo: a celestial occult virtue (of The Sun) which fecundates the Matter of the Philosophers and gives her a son who will, ultimately, grow even more splendid than His Father. 

Vulcan, symbol of Fire, is its second father (or mentor). 

Its third is Mercury, who lends it his own volatile Matter (or Mercury). 

To those three must be added the figure on the left, who is the attentive Artist, 
and as it were the fourth father

Towering above the others is Mars, whose presence is indispensable : 
Without his action, the Body would not be dissolved. 

He is the symbol of the metal which, joined to the mineral Matter, 
attracts the magnetic influence of Phanes: 
Light, Spirit, Fire, personified in Apollo” (p104).








CHAPTER XIV

MENTAL GENDER

Students of psychology who have followed the modern trend of thought along the lines of mental phenomena are struck by the persistence of the dual-mind idea which has manifested itself so strongly during the past ten or fifteen years, and which has given rise to a number of plausible theories regarding the nature and constitution of these "two minds." The late Thomson J. Hudson attained great popularity in 1893 by advancing his well-known theory of the "objective and subjective minds" which he held existed in every individual. Other writers have attracted almost equal attention by the theories regarding the "conscious and subconscious minds"; the "voluntary and involuntary minds"; "the active and passive minds," etc., etc. The theories of the various writers differ from each other, but there remains the underlying principle of "the duality of mind."

The student of the Hermetic Philosophy is tempted to smile when he reads and hears of these many "new theories" regarding the duality of mind, each school adhering tenaciously to its own pet theories, and each claiming to have "discovered the truth." 


The student turns back the pages of occult history, and away back in the dim beginnings of occult teachings he finds references to the ancient Hermetic doctrine of the Principle of Gender on the Mental Plane-the manifestation of Mental Gender. And examining further he finds that the ancient philosophy took cognizance of the phenomenon of the "dual mind," and accounted for it by the theory of Mental Gender. 


This idea of Mental Gender may be explained in a few words to students who are familiar with the modern theories just alluded to. 


The Masculine Principle of Mind corresponds to the so-called Objective Mind; Conscious Mind; Voluntary Mind; Active Mind, etc. And The Feminine Principle of Mind corresponds to the so-called Subjective Mind; Sub-conscious Mind; Involuntary Mind; Passive Mind, etc. 


Of course the Hermetic Teachings do not agree with the many modern theories regarding the nature of the two phases of mind, nor does it admit many of the facts claimed for the two respective aspects—some of the said theories and claims being very far-fetched and incapable of standing the test of experiment and demonstration. We point to the phases of agreement merely for the purpose of helping the student to assimilate his previously acquired knowledge with the teachings of the Hermetic Philosophy. Students of Hudson will notice the statement at the beginning of his second chapter of "The Law of Psychic Phenomena," that: "The mystic jargon of the Hermetic philosophers discloses the same general idea" i.e., the duality of mind. If Dr. Hudson had taken the time and trouble to decipher a little of "the mystic jargon of the Hermetic Philosophy," he might have received much light upon the subject of "the dual mind"—but then, perhaps, his most interesting work might not have been written. Let us now consider the Hermetic Teachings regarding Mental Gender.

The Hermetic Teachers impart their instruction regarding this subject by bidding their students examine the report of their consciousness regarding their Self. The students are bidden to turn their attention inward upon the Self dwelling within each. Each student is led to see that his consciousness gives him first a report of the existence of his Self-the report is "I Am." This at first seems to be the final words from the consciousness, but a little further examination discloses the fact that this "I Am" may be separated or split into two distinct parts, or aspects, which while working in unison and in conjunction, yet, nevertheless, may be separated in consciousness.

While at first there seems to be only an "I" existing, a more careful and closer examination reveals the fact that there exists an "I" and a "Me." These mental twins differ in their characteristics and nature, and an examination of their nature and the phenomena arising from the same will throw much light upon many of the problems of mental influence.

Let us begin with a consideration of the Me, which is usually mistaken for the I by the student, until he presses the inquiry a little further back into the recesses of consciousness. A man thinks of his Self (in its aspect of Me) as being composed of certain feelings, tastes likes, dislikes, habits, peculiar ties, characteristics, etc., all of which go to make up his personality, or the "Self" known to himself and others. He knows that these emotions and feelings change; are born and die away; are subject to the Principle of Rhythm, and the Principle of Polarity, which take him from one extreme of feeling to another. He also thinks of the "Me" as being certain knowledge gathered together in his mind, and thus forming a part of himself. This is the "Me" of a man.

But we have proceeded too hastily. The "Me" of many men may be said to consist largely of their consciousness of the body and their physical appetites, etc. Their consciousness being largely bound up with their bodily nature, they practically "live there." Some men even go so far as to regard their personal apparel as a part of their "Me" and actually seem to consider it a part of themselves. A writer has humorously said that "men consist of three parts—soul, body and clothes." These "clothes conscious" people would lose their personality if divested of their clothing by savages upon the occasion of a shipwreck. But even many who are not so closely bound up with the idea of personal raiment stick closely to the consciousness of their bodies being their "Me" They cannot conceive of a Self independent of the body. Their mind seems to them to be practically "a something belonging to" their body-which in many cases it is indeed.

But as man rises in the scale of consciousness he is able to disentangle his "Me" from his idea of body, and is able to think of his body as "belonging to" the mental part of him. But even then he is very apt to identify the "Me" entirely with the mental states, feelings, etc., which he feels to exist within him. He is very apt to consider these internal states as identical with himself, instead of their being simply "things" produced by some part of his mentality, and existing within him—of him, and in him, but still not "himself." He sees that he may change these internal states of feelings by all effort of will, and that he may produce a feeling or state of an exactly opposite nature, in the same way, and yet the same "Me" exists. And so after a while he is able to set aside these various mental states, emotions, feelings, habits, qualities, characteristics, and other personal mental belongings—he is able to set them aside in the "not-me" collection of curiosities and encumbrances, as well as valuable possessions. This requires much mental concentration and power of mental analysis on the part of the student. But still the task is possible for the advanced student, and even those not so far advanced are able to see, in the imagination, how the process may be performed.

After this laying-aside process has been performed, the student will find himself in conscious possession of a "Self" which may be considered in its "I" and "Me" dual aspects. The "Me" will be felt to be a Something mental in which thoughts, ideas, emotions, feelings, and other mental states may be produced. It may be considered as the "mental womb," as the ancients styled it-capable of generating mental offspring. It reports to the consciousness as a "Me" with latent powers of creation and generation of mental progeny of all sorts and kinds. Its powers of creative energy are felt to be enormous. But still it seems to be conscious that it must receive some form of energy from either its "I" companion, or else from some other "I" ere it is able to bring into being its mental creations. This consciousness brings with it a realization of an enormous capacity for mental work and creative ability.

But the student soon finds that this is not all that he finds within his inner consciousness. He finds that there exists a mental Something which is able to Will that the "Me" act along certain creative lines, and which is also able to stand aside and witness the mental creation. This part of himself he is taught to call his "I." He is able to rest in its consciousness at will. He finds there not a consciousness of an ability to generate and actively create, in the sense of the gradual process attendant upon mental operations, but rather a sense and consciousness of an ability to project an energy from the "I" to the "Me"—a process of "willing" that the mental creation begin and proceed. He also finds that the "I" is able to stand aside and witness the operations of the "Me's" mental creation and generation. There is this dual aspect in the mind of every person. The "I" represents the Masculine Principle of Mental Gender-the "Me" represents the Female Principle. The "I" represents the Aspect of Being; the "Me" the Aspect of Becoming. You will notice that the Principle of Correspondence operates on this plane just as it does upon the great plane upon which the creation of Universes is performed. The two are similar in kind, although vastly different in degree. "As above, so below; as below, so above."

These aspects of mind-the Masculine and Feminine Principles-the "I" and the "Me"-considered in connection with the well-known mental and psychic phenomena, give the master-key to these dimly known regions of mental operation and manifestation. The principle of Mental Gender gives the truth underlying the whole field of the phenomena of mental influence, etc.

The tendency of the Feminine Principle is always in the direction of receiving impressions, while the tendency of the Masculine Principle is always in the direction of giving, out or expressing. The Feminine Principle has much more varied field of operation than has the Masculine Principle. The Feminine Principle conducts the work of generating new thoughts, concepts, ideas, including the work of the imagination. The Masculine Principle contents itself with the work of the "Will" in its varied phases. And yet, without the active aid of the Will of the Masculine Principle, the Feminine Principle is apt to rest content with generating mental images which are the result of impressions received from outside, instead of producing original mental creations.

Persons who can give continued attention and thought to a subject actively employ both of the Mental Principles-the Feminine in the work of the mental generation, and the Masculine Will in stimulating and energizing the creative portion of the mind. The majority of persons really employ the Masculine Principle but little, and are content to live according to the thoughts and ideas instilled into the "Me" from the "I" of other minds. But it is not our purpose to dwell upon this phase of the subject, which may be studied from any good text-book upon psychology, with the key that we have given you regarding Mental Gender.

The student of Psychic Phenomena is aware of the wonderful phenomena classified under the head of Telepathy; Thought Transference; Mental Influence; Suggestion; Hypnotism, etc. Many have sought for an explanation of these varied phases of phenomena under the theories of the various "dual mind" teachers. And in a measure they are right, for there is clearly a manifestation of two distinct phases of mental activity. But if such students will consider these "dual minds" in the light of the Hermetic Teachings regarding Vibrations and Mental Gender, they will see that the long sought for key is at hand.

In the phenomena of Telepathy it is seen how the Vibratory Energy of the Masculine Principle is projected toward the Feminine Principle of another person, and the latter takes the seed-thought and allows it to develop into maturity. In the same way Suggestion and Hypnotism operates. The Masculine Principle of the person giving the suggestions directs a stream of Vibratory Energy or Will-Power toward the Feminine Principle of the other person, and the latter accepting it makes it its own and acts and thinks accordingly. An idea thus lodged in the mind of another person grows and develops, and in time is regarded as the rightful mental offspring of the individual, whereas it is in reality like the cuckoo egg placed in the sparrows nest, where it destroys the rightful offspring and makes itself at home. The normal method is for the Masculine and Feminine Principles in a person's mind to co-ordinate and act harmoniously in conjunction with each other, but, unfortunately, the Masculine Principle in the average person is too lazy to act-the display of Will-Power is too slight-and the consequence is that such persons are ruled almost entirely by the minds and wills of other persons, whom they allow to do their thinking and willing for them. How few original thoughts or original actions are performed by the average person? Are not the majority of persons mere shadows and echoes of others having stronger wills or minds than themselves? The trouble is that the average person dwells almost altogether in his "Me" consciousness and does not realize that he has such a thing as an "I." He is polarized in his Feminine Principle of Mind, and the Masculine Principle, in which is lodged the Will, is allowed to remain inactive and not employed.

The strong men and women of the world invariably manifest the Masculine Principle of Will, and their strength depends materially upon this fact. Instead of living upon the impressions made upon their minds by others, they dominate their own minds by their Will, obtaining the kind of mental images desired, and moreover dominate the minds of others likewise, in the same manner. Look at the strong people, how they manage to implant their seed-thoughts in the minds of the masses of the people, thus causing the latter to think thoughts in accordance with the desires and wills of the strong individuals. This is why the masses of people are such sheeplike creatures, never originating an idea of their own, nor using their own powers of mental activity.

The manifestation of Mental Gender may be noticed all around us in everyday life. The magnetic persons are those who are able to use the Masculine Principle in the way of impressing their ideas upon others. The actor who makes people weep or cry as he wills, is employing this principle. And so is the successful orator, statesman, preacher, writer or other people who are before the public attention. The peculiar influence exerted by some people over others is due to the manifestation of Mental Gender, along the Vibrational lines above indicated. In this principle lies the secret of personal magnetism, personal influence, fascination, etc., as well as the phenomena generally grouped under the name of Hypnotism.

The student who has familiarized himself with the phenomena generally spoken of as "psychic" will have discovered the important part played in the said phenomena by that force which science has styled "Suggestion," by which term is meant the process or method whereby an idea is transferred to, or "impressed upon" the mind of another, causing the second mind to act in accordance therewith. A correct understanding of Suggestion is necessary in order to intelligently comprehend the varied psychical phenomena which Suggestion underlies. But, still more is a knowledge of Vibration and Mental Gender necessary for the student of Suggestion. For the whole principle of Suggestion depends upon the principle of Mental Gender and Vibration.

It is customary for the writers and teachers of Suggestion to explain that it is the "objective or voluntary" mind which make the mental impression, or suggestion, upon the "subjective or involuntary" mind. But they do not describe the process or give us any analogy in nature whereby we may more readily comprehend the idea. But if you will think of the matter in the light of the Hermetic Teachings you will be able to see that the energizing of the Feminine Principle by the Vibratory Energy of the Masculine Principle Is in accordance to the universal laws of nature, and that the natural world affords countless analogies whereby the principle may be understood. In fact, the Hermetic Teachings show that the very creation of the Universe follows the same law, and that in all creative manifestations, upon the planes of the spiritual, the mental, and the physical, there is always in operation this principle of Gender-this manifestation of the Masculine and the Feminine Principles. "As above, so below; as below, so above." And more than this, when the principle of Mental Gender is once grasped and understood, the varied phenomena of psychology at once becomes capable of intelligent classification and study, instead of being very much in the dark. The principle "works out" in practice, because it is based upon the immutable universal laws of life.

We shall not enter into an extended discussion of, or description of, the varied phenomena of mental influence or psychic activity. There are many books, many of them quite good, which have been written and published on this subject of late years. The main facts stated in these various books are correct, although the several writers have attempted to explain the phenomena by various pet theories of their own. The student may acquaint himself with these matters, and by using the theory of Mental Gender he will be able to bring order out of the chaos of conflicting theory and teachings, and may, moreover, readily make himself a master of the subject if he be so inclined. The purpose of this work is not to give an extended account of psychic phenomena but rather to give to the student a master-key whereby He may unlock the many doors leading into the parts of the Temple of Knowledge which he may wish to explore. We feel that in this consideration of the teachings of The Kybalion, one may find an explanation which will serve to clear away many perplexing difficulties—a key that will unlock many doors. What is the use of going into detail regarding all of the many features of psychic phenomena and mental science, provided we place in the hands of the student the means whereby he may acquaint himself fully regarding any phase of the subject which may interest him. With the aid of The Kybalion one may go through any occult library anew, the old Light from Egypt illuminating many dark pages, and obscure subjects. That is the purpose of this book. We do not come expounding a new philosophy, but rather furnishing the outlines of a great world-old teaching which will make clear the teachings of others-which will serve as a Great Reconciler of differing: theories, and opposing doctrines.